3618:, that was not my mistake. That is some simple logic under the reasoning containing combination of two reasons. The logic is that if lawyer's websites are not allowed, then those links do not prove anything, because the sole reason why they were initially included was opinion of a lawyer (and, as I said, those links themselves were from one of his videos, I do not remember which one). So, it would not be an OR issue if I had a good reference to use on the page. Without a good reference it is an OR issue. I just did not realize you would not understand this logic, my note was a shortcut to this thorough description. I think nothing to apologize, it was a misunderstanding on your side. I was not resisting attempts to have my OR remove sine I accepted it in September. There were no attempts. JoelWhy? forgot to enforce the policy and I forgot to make a change as well. My rationale has never been anything like revenge. It looks like you are trying to guess on my reasoning, that is what no one should do. I do not think making personal remarks on wikipedia pages is appropriate.
279:
deleted in block and essentially replaced with propaganda from venezeula analysis.com. I recently read the Hugo Chavez bio and was saddened to see how partisan it was in his favor, in some sections subtly and in others blatantly. Some sections, like the one on crime, were almost laughable (if the issue wasn't so serious) to anyone who has spent significant time in
Venezuela over the past several decades. I plan on doing some work on the april 11 article as that is a complete joke at this point, so we'll see how that goes but anyway thanks. Uninformed and curious individuals need to be aware that the Chavez bio has serious POV issues. The quality of wikipedia needs to be defended from armies of propagandists.
413:
like 'Paterno is a hero but a flawed hero.' I state the opinon that a reference would be fine, along with two notable quotes. I don't have a strong opinion about that, but it was weird that you justify including something like "...as many have concluded from the facts that are known" which just adds to the fluff and vagueness of the whole article, on the grounds that it is fluffy and vague. Not to be critical, but does it really justify leaving those 10 words there in the article? Also those 10 words and also the
Jenkins article have a sort of underlying innuendo too which isn't harmful but certainly doesn't justify including both.
4164:
797:. However, virtually every sentence in the article is referenced. There is nothing in it that is "my" opinion; rather it is a summary of factual information and critical (published) reviews of the band and their music. True, most of the cited reviews are fairly positive: I looked for negative reviews to provide a balanced perspective, but I was not able to find any. That doesn't mean they aren't there, but I was not able to locate them. In any case, I don't believe this makes the article non-NPV. The cited critical comments primarily serve to characterize the band's musical style.
3109:
2794:
for over a century, and one of the strongest in all of
Australia in that time. It was in an area nowhere near any recognised earthquake zone. It was magnitude 5.3, small by world standards, but quite big by Australian standards. The location is also close to some very big open cut coal mines and oil and gas drilling. Also, the name of the article bothers me. I live between Melbourne, the state capital, and where the earthquake happened. It doesn't feel right to name the article after a place further from the quake than I am. If it's to stay, I'd rename, maybe to
1322:
provide constructive criticism. What points are you dissatisfied with? What do you think needs to be improved? Please support you statement "the article gets science wrong" with a proof, citing research published in peer reviewed scientific journals. If you are unable to do so, then please delete what you have written about the article, as it is an unsupported statement (opinion) and come back with a more constructive criticism when you are ready.
2947:
1488:
1575:. I am going through this sick cowardly conspiracy only to have a coward intrude to stop the truth from being known. You whites are so determined and proud to prove you are even bigger cowards. I feel great sorrow for your race for you have not a bit of courage. I strongly adivse you to be strong emotionally for it will improve your outlook on cooperating. Go ahead and resort to the cowards way and delete my page (Non Treaty Chippewa Indians).
1641:
4174:
2070:
3205:
1239:
3342:
4305:
4089:
4016:
3870:
2269:
2624:
2543:
3291:
2505:
2698:
2665:
1950:: "Even if misguided, willfully against consensus, or disruptive, any good-faith effort to improve the encyclopedia is not vandalism. Careful consideration may be required to differentiate between edits that are beneficial, detrimental but well-intentioned, and vandalizing. Mislabelling good-faith edits as vandalism can be considered harmful."
1579:
inevitable which will occur from conducting one's self in a crooked manner. You do not get away with abusing power. Those who abuse power always face a fate caused by their crooked actions. You have no right intruding. Intruders are criminals. You know what happens to criminals who intrude. Incredible numbers of innocent people end up killed.
3788:
part of a Wiki workshop, the appropriate response would have been to quickly mention her accomplishments and that would have been the end of the problem.) Anyhow, I really am glad the issue of sexism on
Knowledge (XXG) is being brought to light; but, I just wish I hadn't ended up in the crosshairs! ;)
27:
to you. And, as an aside, as someone who is a fierce supporter of people in the LQBTQ community, I can assure you that your actions are not having the desired outcome. To the contrary, this type of activism just serves to embolden the right wing bigots (and get people like Trump elected into office.)
3767:
as part of a conversation warning a NPPer to be careful, but I'm quite happy to believe this instance was a simple mistake and you are right that we should assume good faith on NPP taggers, not treat them like ogres and batter them with torches and pitchforks. In at least one instance, I challenged a
3747:
In closing, I do hope you continue to pursue stories about online sexism. This is an important topic and it may take a generation or more for many men to truly recognize just how difficult the online realm can be for women. But, I also do not want to be lumped in with these people as I truly am proud
3672:
Well, that's embarrassing and a bit aggravating. Yes, I nominated it for deletion (as I did for 1,000 other articles). But, I did so because it was 1 sentence long and provided zero information to make one think that the person met 'notability' requirements for Wiki purposes. I'm proud to call myself
3486:
Yes. To a conspiracy theorist, anything you say that suggests there may be after all not be a conspiracy just proves that there is one, and you are part of it, because why else would you want to deny that there is a conspiracy? The result is that anything at all that anyone says about the conspiracy
2793:
On a slightly more constructive note... Just commenting on your proposal to delete, I'm interested in some of your thoughts. I don't know whether we should have an article or not, but I've just slightly improved the article by highlighting that it was the strongest earthquake in this
Australian state
3709:
That being said, I must take issue with one point made in the article. In your second-to-last paragraph, you mention that a page was created for Clare Hasse and then quickly nominated for deletion. I am the Wiki editor who nominated it for deletion, but I can assure you that sexism played no roll in
3575:
for several months and were, in fact, actively resisting attempts to have your original research removed, I doubt that you're all that interested in enforcing this now. What this is about is that you're angry that I ensured that your original research was removed from the page and now you're seeking
3352:
case still awaiting comments and replies. If this dispute has been resolved to the satisfaction of the filing editor and all involved parties, please take a moment to add a note about this at the discussion so that a volunteer may close the case as "Resolved". If the dispute is still ongoing, please
2247:
Look buddy, I frankly don't know what the hell you're talking about. I do dozens of new page reviews. If your page was tagged, and you felt it was incorrect, take it to the talk page and present a reasoned explanation rather than coming onto my page to cry about it. As for notifying you, if the page
2150:
Joel, I've unblocked you. The text you were removing was a BLP violation (I'm inclined to call it vandalism as well, but the unblock doesn't hinge on that definition). I suggest in the future asking for admin help earlier in the process; the 5-10 reverts at that page weren't doing anyone any good,
1578:
If an entity looking out for the future of Native
Americans is involved, i hope they kill you and those close to you, in the most gruesome of manners. Where is your courage? Bring forth your courage by deleting my page (Non Treaty Chippewa Indians). That will prove you have the courage to accept the
256:
However, if you think the material could be put back into the article in a more appropriate manner, perhaps you could be the one to do it. The sources are all first rate. All you have to do is figure out a more appropriate way to incorporate their contents into the article, in a way that you believe
252:
I read the articles at the sources that were cited, and the edit in question is a very, highly accurate summation of the contents of the articles in question. There is no good side to food shortages, hoarding, using the military to seize food, taking away incentives, etc. The content was as balanced
2999:. You were the only person who participated in that discussion, which I don't really understand. With the thousands of people who are registered on this website, I would have thought that at least one other person would have an opinion on the subject. In any event, the article is preserved. Thanks.
2579:
I need your help again. Some rather ill-informed new page patrollers have nominated Mu Canis
Majoris for deletion because they did not bother to look up the notability guidelines for stars. Can you help me fight to keep it? Thanks. Really frusterated by new page patrollers who don't know jack about
2434:
about my argument concerning the usage of the CS term. And as you have repeatedly argued that it (the CS term) a negative, perjorative and derogatory term you have a nerve to now claim that YOU YOURSELF were not using it in a negative way about me to influence other editors about the worthiness of
412:
Also, your justification that Noonan's opinion is more valid than an opinion piece is welcome, note that on the talk page of that article I am working to get someone to reduce the amount of pasted in opinion piece from the
Jenkins article in some intelligent way. The theme of the piece is something
136:
Dear JoelWhy! I receive from You a massage on my talk that the article
Soldatenko, Lukashyk and partners was deleted. I wrote the article because of organizations requests about history of foundation of the law firm which make pro-bono support to the ELSA (international student organization), Orden
52:
I believe, with regard to the article, I have added details about him and a few links I could find. Prof. A Satyanarayana
Shastri is a notable person in circles both in India and Abroad. However, he passed away in 2004 and hence was not covered extensively on online media. Please let me know what I
26:
Knowledge (XXG) is not the place for you to try to strike revenge on every celebrity you believe has wronged your community. You have repeatedly demonstrated that you have no interest in learning the rules of editing on Knowledge (XXG). So, I am not going to waste any more time trying to teach them
1321:
Thank you for your comment on Visual Reading article. Although the article is not perfect, like neither of Knowledge (XXG) articles, it is hard for me to see how the link you provided is MORE scientific than sources cited in the article. If you think that the article is not scientific, then please
3787:
Yea, I mean, maybe I jumped the gun and should have given them more time to beef up the article. But, at the time, when all I saw was 'assistant horticulturist and botanist', I think it was fair to assume that this would run into notability problems. (And, rather than responding by saying this is
3713:
Back in 2012, I volunteered as a 'new page patroller,' skimming through new articles to weed out those that did not appear to meet Wiki editorial requirements. Upon finding articles about bands, people, events, etc that did not appear to meet Wiki requirements, I would send to admin to review for
1347:
I'm not stating my opinion; I pointed to an article that summarizes the findings of speed reading courses. But, I will dig up some peer reviewed journals that say the same thing. And, speaking of peer reviewed articles -- you've listed plenty of citations, but do any of them include peer reviewed
1174:
I agree that the text should be rewritten and properly incorporated into the article. It was mostly dumped there as a placeholder. However, I was more concerned with ensuring that there was appropriate attribution than I was about trying to pretend that I synthesized the background of the case so
1039:
Not the road. Sorry, you can't A9 a band. A9's for recordings with no notability of their own whose artists haven't got an article, and as these have an article, their records can't be A9ed either... (Catch 22a.) A7 includes bands, but db-band is personalised for them. Can't make my mind up about
3705:
Before I begin, I would like to thank you for writing about sexism on Knowledge (XXG). This - along with other horrible acts on online sexism (e.g., gamergate) - is a topic that must be addressed. Clearly, far too many men fail to recognize the gender bias and open hostility many women face on a
278:
I Just want to thank you for your work on the Chavez article. Please ensure the POV tag stays on. Several years ago I tried to edit a completely biased article on a (relatively minor) matter relating to modern Venezuela politics and found that all my work was completely futile, as it was often
3739:
Well, it turned out Ms. Hasse truly was special - and, more importantly, quite notable. The article was eventually updated to provide info on some of her great, pioneering work in this field of science. Accordingly, the page was not deleted. And, that's precisely how the Wiki editing process is
3371:
Hey! I don't know what the current status of E-Verify is in the Immigration bill, but even if the requirement that all employers use it has been removed, I don't think the whole chunk should be removed. It's an important criticism of the bill and if it's been removed that's part of the bill's
1366:
Indeed you are stating your opinion, as you openly acknowledge that you do not know much about Shin's method or about scientific research on speed reading. Moreover in your deletion note you call Hyo Sang Shin's work "pseudo scientific garbage" (?!) Being an editor on Knowledge (XXG) and hiding
485:
For the record, I don't really care about Paterno one way or the other. I don't watch college football, and I don't care at all about college rivalries (I couldn't even tell you who Penn State's rival is!) I just thought this article had a heavy Paterno apologist bias which bothered me. The guy
408:
Reason, it doesn't specify who are 'many' and what they have concluded. More crucially, what exactly are the facts that are known? The facts of what McQueary saw are a bit hazy since the grand jury presentment says anal rape, while his prelim perjury testimony says something about body position
3833:
experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a
3462:
Ha, thanks for the laugh! I used to get into lengthy discussions with conspiracy theorists, but ultimately found it to be entirely pointless. It always devolved into their backpedaling, moving the goal posts, and/or accusing me of being a shill for Big Pharma, the government, or shape-shifting
2363:
I just set up a few pages for some authors and their books and they are all being proposed for deletion. You guys move quickly. I was in the middle of writing, got up for a few minutes and by the time I sat back down, everything had been tagged. I'd like to keep these pages up as they are for
479:
Yea, basically, someone made a fairly pedantic argument that we don't know for sure he didn't go to the police, because all of the evidence showed he went to an administrator, but didn't specifically say he never contacted police. There's ample evidence he never went to the police, none of his
3950:"Knowledge (XXG) articles are required to present a neutral point of view. However, reliable sources are not required to be neutral, unbiased, or objective. Sometimes non-neutral sources are the best possible sources for supporting information about the different viewpoints held on a subject."
520:
I was thinking of more than just thermite, but they did not dismiss thermite either. Saying something is unlikely is not the same as concluding it did not occur, which is what NIST did on the use of explosives. However, NIST only specifically looked at controlled demolition claims and Popular
3743:
To be clear, I sent dozens of new articles for deletion consideration. This process is necessary to try to keep Knowledge (XXG) from being overrun with articles about every neighborhood garage band, local business, or friend who was once mentioned in a new story. I acted in good faith when I
21:
I provided a source that directly called Richard a TERF, and yet it was removed for not being "neutral". What is neutral, then? Only the people you like? And again, all you're gonna do is censor and silence, never your own research? And you expect me to believe you're doing it in good faith?
4028:
is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
1373:
I would kindly request you delete the posts that you added on top of the article's page before you are ready for any constructive discussion. Please also remove your libelous comments about Hyo Sang Shin and his work. If it is not done, I will complain to Knowledge (XXG) administrators.
4101:
is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
3723:
The information provided gave me no reason to think Ms. Hasse was 'notable' (i.e. 'Notability' is a term defined under Wiki editorial rules, and is a threshold that generally must be met for an article to remain included in Knowledge (XXG).)So, I sent it for deletion consideration.
3701:
I would like to refute the implications in your recent article about sexism in Knowledge (XXG) that I attempted to have an article deleted because of some sort of gender bias. I really wish you would have at least checked with me before publishing the article to allow me to respond.
1833:
article has been significantly expanded and improved with sources. Therefore, I'm requesting that you revisit the article and it's AfD discussion. Only people that have contributed to the AfD discussion are receiving this message (no canvassing). Thank you for your consideration.
428:
Yes, very much so. It was tacked on by someone arguing that we don't know for certain whether Paterno ever went to the police (despite the numerous reports that he never went to the police, and the criticism by the Chief of Police criticizing him for never contacting the
1946:, I just wanted to note that your use of the term vandalism in the edit summary is inconsistent with the meaning on Knowledge (XXG). Since 3RR doesn't apply to vandalism, I'd hate to see you sanctioned for multiple reverts of something you thought was vandalism. See
869:
Articles and other Knowledge (XXG) pages may, in accordance with the guideline, use brief verbatim textual excerpts from copyrighted media, properly attributed or cited to its original source or author, and specifically indicated as direct quotations via quotation
3736:" So, maybe I'm missing something here, but 'assistant horticulturist and botanist'? I'm just not understanding how that's notable. There are plenty of people employed by the USDA, and we don't make Wiki pages for all of them. What's so special about Ms. Hasse?"
2289:
in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:
3588:
on the basis that justice.gov, an official government website, cannot by any stretch of the imagination be described as spam for an individual lawyer. If you'd actually given the correct rationale to start with, we could have had a look, so again, that is
2215:
Why did you tag Solution 13?? It meets Music criteria 6, Is an ensemble which contains two or more independently notable musicians, or is a musician who has been a member of two or more independently notable ensembles: Tarmo Kanerva from Poisonblack and
3301:
regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You do not need to participate however, you are invited to help find a resolution. The thread is
1348:
articles finding that Shin's method can improve people's ability to read 1,000+ WPM? I haven't gone through all the cited works, but I'm assuming none of them say that such a feat occurred, at least not without a substantial loss in reading comprehension.
3882:
is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
1115:
In any case, I withdraw my objection to the page. I misread -- I thought it was only notable because the bassist was related to Fogerty. I now see that Fogerty was in the band, and his nephew joined for one album. So, sorry for wasting your time. :)
2364:
best-selling authors in niche genres with large fan bases that have an interest in learning more about them. If there are specific changes I need to make to avoid deletion, please let me know. Otherwise, I'll try to just add more detail asap.
2423:
comment was not an ad hominem. An ad hominem is "an attempt to negate the truth of a claim by pointing out a negative characteristic or belief of the person supporting it." I was stating my perceived opinion about why you support a particular
846:
I see your point about the review excerpts. When I included those quotes, I was really looking for information to characterize their music--but it was almost impossible to find that outside of reviews. As I noted above, the NPOV guidelines
1452:
Please don't say "keep, it just needs work" unless you plan to do the work yourself. I see this all the time. "Keep, it just needs work" gets spammed. Everyone claims that the article can be fixed, but nobody gets around to fixing it. Ever.
651:
About the Shippingsport Bridge... I saw you say it was fake in the deletion talk, I live two miles from it and my uncle owns a hotel 50 feet from it! So if I see that page deleted because it's "fake", I'm gonna rewrite it. No way avoiding.
458:
OK. I understand this. The phrase makes sense, but only to people who have been involved in writing the article. I took it to mean 'he should have contacted the police because the facts of wrongdoing are evident to many unspecified people.'
2690:
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to
3584:. No mention at all of original research, so that's like your claim that I offered to report myself for vandalism or that I added 3 links that hadn't been there previously. Totally false and you should have the decency to apologise. I
2735:
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in
878:
As to your question, I think their most recent album "Nine Lucid Dreams" is their best work so I would recommend starting there. It's very well done, in my opinion. You can hear one of the songs from the album just by going to
856:
I will add quotation marks as you suggest and perhaps attribution; though I think the citation should be sufficient. In these cases, I don't think copyright is an issue because the excerpts are very brief and are covered under
480:
supporters claim he went to the police, and the police say he never contacted them; not even Paterno claimed he went to the police. This was just what I can only assume to be a Paterno supporter trying to make him look better.
3427:
248:
isn't helping matters. The other editors just dismiss you as being a vandal. If you're serious about improving the page (which is heavily pro-Chavez at the moment), please join in the discussion, help provide sources, etc."
2335:. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our
2328:
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on
535:
Would you please stop making snarky remarks about me, especially on the basis of the claim that I am a conspiracy theorist despite me reminding you previously that I have not at any point said I believe the conspiracy
3160:
4348:
4129:
4056:
3910:
3102:
3720:"Clara H. Hasse (1880?-1924) was an assistant horticulturist and botanist in the Bureau of Plant Industry, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C., and later worked at the Florida Experiment Station."
3098:
1731:
1676:
ps- Not sure if this was the right one (was looking for one about keeping a cool head), but its a good fit. Cahnge it if you see fit ;) The Good Humour one could do based on your response on that users talk
3744:
requested the Hasse article be deleted - albeit, I may have been a bit hasty - and I am thrilled that additional information was provided to demonstrate that she truly deserves to be honored for her work.
2636:, which you've sourced to Murthy Law Firm. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.
1178:
It should be simple enough to reconstruct the background information from the publicly available documents (litigant briefs, amici curiae, and the decision itself). Maybe I'll be able to get to it today.
550:"Mainstream" implies that fringe media outlets are the only ones that have not rejected them, but removing that implies all media outlets have done so. Please see my comments on the article talk page.--
76:
article. My case for her notability rests on her successful work to open the Met Police archives to the public, when they were infamously suspected of being secretive on issues such as Jack the Ripper.
4332:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
4113:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
4040:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
3894:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
486:
didn't molest anyone, he's not some evil sociopath. Do I think he should have gone to the cops? Of course. But, all I want is an objective article. Anyhow, thanks for the assistance with the article.
3447:. If I had known about stuff like that before, I probably wouldn't have tried so hard to explain things to the editor, as it is clear that he/she is never going to listen to reasons on such issues.
3167:
1797:
1750:
1055:
Thanks Peridon. I actually posted on the Talk page right after my CSD submission that I meant to do A9, not A7. In any case, I'll leave it up to you to decide whether they warrant deletion or not.
3967:
This was being used to to express a viewpoint, but it was presented as fact. If you'd like to rework the text to show this side's argument, that's fine. But, as it was used, it violated NPOV.
3323:
1544:
Yeah, I happened to stumble into the deletion discussion while patrolling new pages, and I was rather shocked at how the article was being defended. The fact that the article creator actually
3491:, strengthens their conviction that there is one. I learnt years ago to just listen politely for a minute and then change the subject when my sister starts on the great world-wide conspiracy.
1367:
behind JoelWhy nickname does not give you the right to post libelous comments on other people's work. If you do not know or do not understand something, it does not mean that it is wrong.
4318:
409:
and/or unseen fondling. Note I took out the next sentence too and I don't disagree with reverting that, don't care. Do you agree with re-deleting that 10 word phrase above? Think about it.
3540:
Hi, I want to file WP:OR violation case against Valenciano regarding his latest change to the page. You saw my arguments. What do you think about it? What is the best way of doing that?
1823:
202:
page. I know its kind of trivial, but a unified style can make the page look classy. As you are an active editor your input is greatly appreciated. To have your voice heard please go to
2778:
Hi JoelWhy. I live near a construction site, and thought to myself, "That's odd: one of the drivers of the earth-moving equipment must have taken a short-cut past my house..." :-) --
2248:
was marked for deletion, you were notified. Otherwise, you would have it listed on your watchlist. For Christ's sake, this isn't some grave injustice you have to moan on and on about.
104:
Dear JoelWhy I have included references & believe Parlo qualifies to be a notable MMA fighter. I hope you will review the article & consider not removing it. Thank you, Adam
3067:
I am kind of disappointed that you note the 29 quasi-propaganda link backs inside the Huge Chavez article, yet you say that removing them would be wrong. How does that work exactly?
714:. Therefore, please point out the section of article where you find neutrality issue or start a discussion on the Talk page, or consider removing the tag which doesn't comply with
1370:
I suggest you do your research. Prepare a constructive and substantiated critique of the article and only after that tag the article as biased or raise a discussion to delete it.
3376:
it was removed. If civil liberties groups were successful in getting it removed, that's important information about the strength of their criticism. Do you see what I mean?
3045:
article. I'm proposing removing the "Recent Controveries" section, as I don't see its intrinsic value in an encyclopedic page on a city. I'd appreciate your feedback! Cheers,
2798:
or similar, but I bow to your greater experience re these matters on all the above points. So, your thoughts please. Should I bother with the above improvements, or is this a
2401:
1923:
Yeah, I suck at referencing. I would greatly appreciate your assistance. I can find and create the stubs easily enough, but the star boxes and improving them is beyond me. :)
4209:
941:
Frankly that's really scary to be accused of copywrite violation when somebody else copies one's work from Knowledge (XXG). There should be some safeguards against that. --
1494:
1487:
3730:"This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because it is a part of the wikipedia edit-a-thon at the Smithsonian and it is in process."
4245:
1412:
I would like to notify you that I have raised a complaint regarding your libelous and unsubstantiated points on Visual reading article. You can view the complaint here
3327:
1615:
hat said the comment should be struck from the edit histry. Have you thought of petitioning for it? I would support, but i think its common sense to strike it off (
3944:, why would the source not be considered reliable for a relatively unbiased description of how Jallikattu works? Sources don't have to be unbiased to be included.
2556:
2648:
1756:
I'm hoping you might return to the AFd and perhaps offer support for a redirect to the newly created section on the filmmaker's earlier projects to be found at
927:
Decline speedy, looks to me like the remote page copied from Knowledge (XXG), not the other way around. This material was all originally in History of Anatolia.
137:
de Malta etc. If you have any concerns or questions about this article please let me know on my talk page. Please undelete the article. Sincerely Yours, Bohdan
3768:
speedy tag on an article, the tagger agreed with my arguments and helped improve the article to DYK, so it is worth refraining from beating people up over it.
2725:
1069:
You can always change a tag. No probs there. As to notability or significance: No way. I said I can't decide. Anyway, what I came back for was to point you at
4281:
I see that you are a big part of the US project I was wondering if you could help create articles for some of the state courts that are still missing? Thanks
2604:
I just saw that you added your name to the members list of WikiProject United States. Welcome to the project and please let me know if you have any question.
1943:
2322:
179:
page have been wondering about reference format and what style of citation should be used. You are invited to join in the discussion and give your input at
812:
Which is exactly what this article does. So as far as I can tell, the article complies--it is "balanced" to the extent possible and everything is cited.
3349:
3303:
3298:
96:
Happy to talk. do not want to upset you. sorry please explain in English what you believe the problem is, I have NOT even finished editing yet. regards.
3443:
After I posted that message, I decided to have a look at the editor's editing history on other topics. I discovered some truly wonderful stuff, such as
3986:
Ahh, I see you were just using it for the initial, more neutral portion. I suppose that's fine - the aggregious use was in the section on breeding.
3372:
political history. Rather, start a new section ("Removed provisions" maybe?), move the info there, and add sources indicating that it was removed and
729:
Suggestion: Best will be to use {{{{POV-section}}}} to mark the section with neutrality issue, that way editors can find it easy to work on the issue.
2397:
2301:
625:
also Takara can show her dominant side. every time you delete it, i will put it back because im telling the truth. go on cetacean cousins for proof.
2745:
1881:
Hi, the picture is representing the French Marie Sklodowska Curie (she is from Poland!!), who lives in France. Is not this a bug? What do you think?
2822:
Hey, JoelWhy, in the course of looking at the duplicate nomination for the Fed chairman list, I noticed that the talk page link in your sig goes to
2094:
2028:
668:
3838:
3829:
Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most
1973:
Removal of libelous, biased, unsourced, or poorly sourced contentious material that violates the policy on biographies of living persons (BLP)."
3822:
is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group
2753:
2340:
2336:
2286:
2130:
862:
851:
specifically say that it's appropriate in cases such as this to include critical review opinions even though they are obviously not "netural."
4197:
4189:
2447:
as a reason for disregarding their contribution to a topic is a classic ad hominem attack. And as you have made clear the term for you is a
2043:
apply to campaign articles about other politicians. Perhaps some other discussion or arbitration or other <insert Wiki-acronyms here: -->
4370:
4269:
4143:
4070:
3924:
3850:
280:
4216:
2580:
their job. Why contribute to the wikipedia if people are just going to delete what you work on without caring about actually contributing?
4236:
3580:. You file whatever report you like, but remember, your rationale for the removal had nothing to do with original research. You stated:
3395:
Hello, please provide a source for your assertion that a change needs to be filed 6 months before the L-1B petition expires. Thank you.
2672:, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter
2347:
632:
603:
4227:. Participants will claim points for uploading and importing 2D scans of US banknotes, and at the end of the contest all will receive
3260:
3184:
1282:
2964:
2891:
2044:
have judged to the contrary. If so, apologies. If you'd like to continue this discussion, consider moving it to my talk page. Cheers,
1501:
744:
737:
260:
58:
801:
696:
692:
3556:
3529:
3097:(DR) about some of the most important issues, advances, and challenges in the area. You were delivered this update because you are
2833:
2772:
2175:
1332:
1297:
2098:
1530:
is interesting, if you get through the contemporary academese writing. It's readable online at the author's site and other places.
3643:
1659:
restraint on a comment and even death threat one might say and holding your head till it was resolved in the way it needed to be.
3776:
2380:
120:
4224:
2729:
2721:
324:
Yes, sorry, I've been super busy at work and just haven't had a chance to get around to it! I'll try to get to it soon, thanks!!
4366:
4265:
4139:
4066:
3920:
3846:
3027:
2141:
582:
555:
541:
526:
4341:
4163:
4122:
4049:
3903:
3022:
of an article to which you have recently contributed. Any help in addressing the concerns raised in the review are welcome.--
2344:
586:
4228:
4212:, communities, and private companies have issued banknotes that are in the public domain today but are absent from Commons.
3754:
3673:
a feminist, and I'm a bit ticked off that this journalist included this mention with zero investigation into the matter.
3031:
2114:
2090:
1040:
Ruby. I've not heard of them, but they're not in my areas of music so that might mean lower echelon notable or non-notable.
2639:
If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
888:
I appreciate your input. I'm still learning about the Knowledge (XXG) guidelines..... I'll make the edits and remove the
703:
clearly in mind. The explicit statements sufficiently cite 3rd party references. The resource is authentic and legitimate.
521:
Mechanics focused on mainly the Loose Change-type accusations. Neither were looking at questions of criminal culpability.--
4201:
3004:
2715:
2554:
has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath
2513:
1436:
1393:
574:
54:
2749:
2709:
2282:
1166:
decision (and any related documents, I believe) are public domain. The content is clearly marked in a <blockquote: -->
2321:
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject,
1595:
559:
545:
530:
82:
2314:
2077:
4353:
4134:
4061:
3915:
2189:
For your work reverting BLP violations. It might have went a little wrong, but your work is noted and appreciated. :)
1020:
983:
964:
Hello JoelWhy, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of
664:
4220:
3023:
578:
551:
537:
522:
402:
I note that you undid a bit of my work on Paterno, which I more or less agree with. I was trying to cut this phrase
3108:
2486:
808:"it is appropriate to note how an artist or a work has been received by prominent experts and the general public. "
756:
3819:
2895:
2295:
2277:
1416:
http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Wikiquette_assistance#Libelous_and_unsubstantiated_edits_by_a_new_page_patroller
3272:
2795:
1814:
1769:
1252:
1466:
Fair point, TPH. I do solemnly pledge to (at the very least) take out all the PR crap and make the page neutral.
501:
Yeah well you seem to know about Knowledge (XXG) so I'll leave it to your greater expertise on that front, bye.
3818:
In order to better control the quality of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the
3000:
1713:
4329:
4110:
4037:
3891:
2594:
284:
2914:
1528:
The Reptoid Hypothesis: Utopian and Dystopian Representational Motifs in David Icke's Alien Conspiracy Theory
462:
It needs to be made more precise somehow, otherwise seeems to implly some unspecified facts, very confusing.
78:
4223:. The goal of the contest is to increase the number of US banknote images available to content creators on
3582:"Removed references to info from a lawyer's website that could be interpreted as a veiled spam for a lawyer"
3244:
on Seattle-related Knowledge (XXG) articles with Knowledge (XXG) tutorials and Librarian assistance on hand.
3072:
2456:
1739:
636:
607:
506:
469:
449:
418:
264:
3544:
3517:
2368:
1978:
The reverted text seems to be "biased" and "poorly sourced", and is clearly "contentious". I don't think a
1892:
1863:
1583:
1424:
1381:
1336:
1328:
656:
628:
599:
290:
108:
73:
3496:
3452:
3434:
3381:
2632:
2049:
1987:
1830:
1611:
You certainly took the above in the right spirit and sayed level headed, should get a barnsar for that ;)
1015:
978:
660:
622:
Ulises can be seen with Corky and he is indeed dominant for a male. you can read it on cetacean cousins.
444:
Hi, In note you're online now, can you explain in greater length? I'm not conversant with the facts here.
3727:
Shortly after I submitted it for deletion, the editor posted the following on the article's 'Talk' page:
2823:
718:, so editors can re-work on the article and make it better. Otherwise, I as an editor have to remove the
4286:
3957:
3623:
3552:
3525:
2830:
2680:
2585:
2482:
2197:
2156:
1928:
1837:
1511:
1301:
752:
314:
161:
3513:
What is wrong with diversity visa page? I provided all necessary links with references -- AlexanderRa
2644:
203:
180:
3619:
3568:
3548:
3521:
233:
edit, you commented, "You need to put this in an encyclopedic, balanced format if you want it added."
157:
3774:
3602:
3268:
3019:
2981:
2953:
2946:
2910:
2376:
2372:
1807:
1803:
As you've come to agree that a redirect is a suitable option, might you consider placing a <s: -->
1778:
1762:
965:
958:
359:
Yes, I do. Haven't been around this weekend, so I'll have to check the page to see what's going on...
142:
138:
116:
112:
53:
can do to fix this. I would like to retain the page, and I am new to Knowledge (XXG). Please help.
4312:
4097:
4024:
3878:
3860:
2673:
1854:
Hi. I found an error in the article (see photo). Copernicus was not a German, he was from Poland. --
4232:
1784:
I have reworded the article and brought in new references. Is it OK if the tags are removed now? --
1709:
1557:
1217:
1212:
I cleaned up some of the text just now. Thanks for catching this and for keeping me honest. :-) --
1184:
946:
307:
215:
188:
4325:
4244:
If you do not want to receive invitations to future US Banknote Contests, follow the instructions
4106:
4033:
3945:
3887:
2435:
my argument and opinion. Classifying someone with a term that has negative connotations such as a
1947:
1428:
1385:
3594:
3068:
3050:
2565:
2516:
with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going
2452:
1909:
1735:
1587:
1141:
930:
918:
904:
830:
707:
502:
465:
445:
414:
3577:
2996:
2989:
1967:
3644:
http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2015/10/how-wikipedia-is-hostile-to-women/411619/
4205:
3492:
3448:
3430:
3377:
2783:
2761:
2609:
2551:
2045:
1983:
1531:
1432:
1389:
1156:
1092:
1078:
1045:
794:
783:
382:
349:
4337:
4118:
4045:
3899:
2799:
4360:
4282:
3953:
3400:
2827:
2807:
2581:
2527:
2517:
2190:
2152:
2120:
1924:
1886:
1858:
1785:
1706:
The article makes a credible assertion of importance or significance, sufficient to pass A7.
1682:
1664:
1620:
1591:
1255:
710:
regarding the neutrality issue, or why the article is biased, Which is a clear violation of
596:
ive noticed that every time i edited List of captive orcas, stuff i wrote has been deleted
310:
4340:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
4333:
4173:
4121:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
4114:
4048:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
4041:
3902:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
3895:
2102:
2016:
1997:
1979:
1640:
973:
700:
3769:
3659:
3615:
3598:
2972:
2906:
889:
816:
790:
3572:
3094:
2323:
requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license
2281:. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of
2110:
2106:
2086:
2082:
2742:
Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged
2396:
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at
3762:
3717:
When I initially came across the the Clara Hasse article, it consisted of 1 sentence:
3355:
3307:
3204:
2217:
2135:
1701:
1694:
1553:
1415:
1238:
1213:
1180:
1011:
Not all professors are notable enough to survive AFD, but they aren't candidate for A7.
1006:
999:
942:
892:. Please let me know if you think it still needs work. I want to make it "right"! :-)
211:
184:
3046:
2561:
2225:
1905:
1875:
1757:
900:
826:
688:
3341:
2560:
and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!
1904:
Once I finish all the 50m swimmers articles, I will go back and add some more info.
3987:
3968:
3789:
3674:
3464:
3101:, but if you would prefer not to receive any future mailing, just add your name to
2921:
2864:
2843:
2779:
2757:
2605:
2547:
2249:
1467:
1349:
1195:
1117:
1102:
1088:
1074:
1056:
1041:
800:
I'm not sure what else I could do to make the article more "neutral." I did read
767:
723:
715:
711:
487:
430:
378:
360:
345:
325:
245:
28:
4304:
4088:
4015:
3869:
3041:
hi Joel - if you get a chance, please see my recent suggestion for improving the
2473:
Hello JoelWhy. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of
1700:
Hello JoelWhy. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of
1005:
Hello JoelWhy. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of
743:
Hello JoelWhy. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of
3396:
3042:
2803:
2521:
2509:
2497:
2474:
2467:
2001:
1951:
1882:
1855:
1678:
1660:
1616:
241:
199:
176:
4193:
3234:
Meeting Room 1 on Level 4, Central Library, 1000 4th Avenue, Seattle WA, 98104
2728:
justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See
2268:
3649:
2900:] ]. There seems to be an errant link to "(Joelwhy)" instead of to "Joelwhy".
2898:. The code looks like this at the User talk page for A. Satyanarayana Shastri:
2542:
2405:
1281:
198:
You are invited to join a discussion on the citation style to be used for the
1970:, "The following actions are not counted as reverts for the purposes of 3RR:
1171:, which is using a Creative Commons license (albeit the non-commercial one).
815:
Please advise. If I don't hear anything in a few days, I am going to remove
4257:
2894:. The talk-link doesn't link to your actual talkpage, but instead links to
2032:
308:
Talk:Hugo_Chávez#A_general_philosophical_remark_about_.27academic.27_sources
2477:, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern:
1704:, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern:
1405:
Libelous and unsubstantiated comments on Visual Reading article (complaint)
1009:, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern:
968:, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern:
747:, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern:
2658:
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to
2174:
858:
4344:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
4125:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
4052:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
3906:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
3348:
This is a friendly reminder to involved parties that there is a current
2595:
http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Mu_Canis_Majoris
2504:
2400:
regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is
1805:
over your earlier "delete" !vote to avoid possible confusions? Thanks,
4322:
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
2031:. The edit in question tried, yet again, to tie his campaign slogan to
1848:
1070:
3297:
This message is being sent to you let you know of a discussion at the
3290:
2220:, who has his own article. This was established in the article, with
1732:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/List of bus routes in Harleston
1163:
1073:
which you might find interesting. (Peridon getting verbose again...)
925:
I've declined the deletion of this article for the following reason:
4374:
4290:
4261:
4147:
4074:
4000:
3981:
3961:
3928:
3854:
3802:
3778:
3687:
3666:
3627:
3606:
3560:
3533:
3500:
3477:
3456:
3438:
3426:
3404:
3385:
3361:
3331:
3312:
3276:
3256:
3076:
3054:
3008:
2983:
2960:
2934:
2877:
2854:
2836:
2811:
2787:
2765:
2613:
2589:
2569:
2531:
2490:
2460:
2408:
2384:
2350:
2257:
2241:
2202:
2160:
2151:
as it was clear the IP was going to keep reverting until blocked. --
2145:
2053:
2008:
1991:
1958:
1932:
1913:
1896:
1867:
1842:
1817:
1790:
1772:
1743:
1717:
1686:
1668:
1624:
1599:
1561:
1534:
1516:
1475:
1460:
1440:
1397:
1357:
1340:
1305:
1264:
1221:
1203:
1188:
1125:
1110:
1096:
1082:
1064:
1049:
1029:
992:
950:
935:
908:
834:
775:
760:
672:
640:
611:
510:
495:
473:
453:
438:
422:
386:
368:
353:
333:
318:
294:
268:
219:
192:
165:
156:
I wrote a short comment in the talk page of MMR vaccine controversy
146:
124:
86:
62:
41:
3093:. This will be a place to semi-regularly update editors active in
3203:
3107:
1548:
the reference to James Bond after the discussion began almot made
2479:
Being the guitarist of a notable band is enough to meet A7 to me.
4357:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add
3147:: How the newest DR forum has progressed between May and August
2902:
2520:, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. ~
1798:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Patient J (2nd nomination)
1751:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Patient J (2nd nomination)
1552:
think that it had to be a joke, but sadly I don't think it is.
4347:
If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review
4128:
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review
4055:
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review
3909:
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review
1448:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Biotechnology in Maryland
4316:
is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All
2039:
BLP issues would apply to edits to this article, just as they
1071:
http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:Mgoodyear#Classical_Anatolia
377:
It goes without saying that your further input is welcome. --
3340:
3289:
2967:
at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
2945:
2622:
2317:, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.
2267:
2068:
1824:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Pakistani Village Life
1504:
at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
1486:
2686:
to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
2308:
without deleting the original replaceable fair use template
3571:, given that you weren't remotely interested in enforcing
2224:
from reliable sources. Also, thanks for notifying me...
1168:
3193:
Decemmber 8 - Knowledge (XXG) Loves Libraries Seattle -
3161:
Geopolitical, ethnic, and religious conflicts noticeboard
2105:. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek
1194:
You are absolutely correct, my mistake. Sorry about that!
3306:". Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!
3286:
Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.
405:"as many have concluded from the facts that are known."
4328:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
4109:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
4036:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
3941:
3890:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
3837:
Find out more about this exiting new user right now at
3585:
3581:
3444:
3415:
3153:: Checking up on the Wikiquette Assistance close debate
2737:
2331:
2015:
Thanks. I wonder about BLP applicability in this case.
1149:
880:
570:
237:
230:
3845:
and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying.
3231:
3141:: Where DR happened, broken down by the top DR forums
2885:
2732:
for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
2019:
states "Editors must take particular care when adding
4188:
There are an estimated 30,000 different varieties of
2109:, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request
1495:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Five Base Yogas
1482:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Five Base Yogas
3759:
I just used your old diff tagging this article with
2339:. If you have any questions please ask them at the
2285:, but its use in Knowledge (XXG) articles fails our
706:
The question is, you haven't given your view on the
395:
As many have concluded from the facts that are known
72:
I shall endeavour to add further references for the
2752:. If you have any questions please ask them at the
2619:
File permission problem with File:Sheela Murthy.jpg
2508:An article that you have been involved in editing,
4192:, yet only a fraction of these are represented on
3706:daily basis, both online and in the 'real' world.
3135:: Highlights from Steven Zhang's April 2012 survey
257:is more conductive to improving the encyclopedia.
4235:or you just want to have fun, all are invited to
2264:Replaceable fair use File:Sheela Murthy Photo.jpg
680:Issue of Neutrality: on the article Pushpa Basnet
4219:will be running a cross-wiki upload-a-thon, the
3318:I left a message for you on alternative medicine
2402:Requesting another topic ban for User:BruceGrubb
2000:, which the article in discussion is not a BLP.
970:eminent professor is an assertion of importance.
3834:dynamic, supportive environment for your work.
2708:If you believe the media meets the criteria at
2027:Knowledge (XXG) page". The page in question is
3299:Knowledge (XXG):Dispute resolution noticeboard
2886:There's something wrong with your signature...
2748:. You may wish to read the Knowledge (XXG)'s
2113:. If you would like to be unblocked, you may
244:page who aren't overtly pro-Chavez. But, the
8:
3085:: A Dispute Resolution Newsletter (Issue #1)
2722:Knowledge (XXG):File copyright tags#Fair use
2097:. During a dispute, you should first try to
1251:Thanks for helping me improving the article
569:Would you mind providing your opinion about
2430:is about me (ad hominem = against the man)
2398:Knowledge (XXG):Administrators' noticeboard
2129:below this notice, but you should read the
1982:block of this editor would be appropriate.
344:Do you still participate with this page? --
4299:
2952:Hello, JoelWhy. You have new messages at
1493:Hello, JoelWhy. You have new messages at
1101:lol, yes, I keep saying A9, but I mean A7!
976:before tagging further pages. Thank you.
732:Thanks. Salman 04:54, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
2325:, or by taking a picture of it yourself.
1638:
1279:
863:Knowledge (XXG):Non-free_content_criteria
687:I seem to have an issue with the article
4215:In the months of November and December,
4196:in the form of 2D scans. Additionally,
2647:or another acceptable free license (see
2095:Barack Obama presidential campaign, 2012
2029:Barack Obama presidential campaign, 2012
841:Hi, JoelWhy -- thanks for your response.
695:. The final article was drafted putting
240:, "I'd love to have more editors on the
3692:Here is what I eMailed to the Atlantic:
3597:: when you're in a hole, stop digging.
3578:disrupt Knowledge (XXG) to make a point
3414:Not only do I agree with every word of
3185:Knowledge (XXG) Loves Libraries Seattle
3123:: A brief overview of the DR ecosystem.
2842:Thanks! I think it's fixed now. :)
2653:at the site of the original publication
2643:make a note permitting reuse under the
2081:from editing for a short time for your
1087:Hang on, surely you meant A7 not A9...
3949:
3324:2602:306:C518:6C40:D5B6:C1CD:4D8E:9B53
2172:
1296:Thanks for your recent contributions!
802:Knowledge (XXG):Neutral_point_of_view
175:Hey, I know a bunch of people on the
7:
4313:2020 Arbitration Committee elections
4171:
4161:
4098:2018 Arbitration Committee elections
4025:2017 Arbitration Committee elections
3879:2016 Arbitration Committee elections
3820:current system we introduced in 2011
2826:. Might want to fix that. Thanks!
2600:Welcome to WikiProject United States
225:Regarding this edit that you made...
4330:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process
4296:ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
4111:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process
4038:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process
3892:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process
3112:Steven Zhang's Fellowship Slideshow
2920:Thanks! I think it's fixed now.
2730:Knowledge (XXG):File copyright tags
2720:or one of the other tags listed at
4082:ArbCom 2018 election voter message
4009:ArbCom 2017 election voter message
3640:Something you did is in the news.
2892:User talk:A. Satyanarayana Shastri
861:. I looked up the policy, and in
745:Crave (For King and Country album)
738:Crave (For King and Country album)
14:
4231:. Whether you want to claim the
3257:http://wll-seattle.eventbrite.com
3168:Read the entire first edition of
2818:AfD of Fed chairman religion list
2773:Melbourne Earthquake June 19 2012
1420:Kind regards, Natalia (Azbukva)
132:Soldatenko, Lukashyk and partners
4303:
4172:
4162:
4087:
4014:
3868:
3425:
3089:Welcome to the first edition of
3063:Chavez and Venezuelaanalysis.com
2710:Knowledge (XXG):Non-free content
2696:
2663:
2541:
2503:
2302:di-replaceable fair use disputed
2287:first non-free content criterion
2173:
2021:information about living persons
1639:
1280:
1237:
306:Hi! TFD asked you a question at
4351:and submit your choices on the
4132:and submit your choices on the
4059:and submit your choices on the
2191:
1942:While I agree with your revert
4095:Hello, JoelWhy. Voting in the
4022:Hello, JoelWhy. Voting in the
3876:Hello, JoelWhy. Voting in the
3593:, nobody else's. Remember the
3534:18:38, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
3350:Dispute Resolution Noticeboard
3180:19:10, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
2754:Media copyright questions page
2537:DYK nomination of Jill Farrant
2421:You have just said that your "
2341:Media copyright questions page
1:
4375:01:21, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
4291:16:08, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
4148:18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
3929:22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
3855:04:28, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
3648:Second to last paragraph. —
3509:Diversity Immigrant Visa page
2676:. If you take this step, add
2552:Did You Know nominations page
2099:discuss controversial changes
789:Hi, I noticed that you added
334:21:52, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
319:21:42, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
183:. Let the debate begin ... --
4262:23:30, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
4075:18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
4001:17:47, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
3991:
3982:17:45, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
3972:
3962:17:07, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
3811:New deal for page patrollers
3803:18:15, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
3793:
3779:17:27, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
3688:13:51, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
3678:
3667:15:52, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
3501:13:35, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
3478:12:55, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
3468:
3457:21:14, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
3439:21:07, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
3337:Hello, from a DR/N volunteer
3277:03:10, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
2925:
2896:Creating User talk:(JoelWhy)
2868:
2847:
2746:criteria for speedy deletion
2278:File:Sheela Murthy Photo.jpg
974:Criteria for Speedy Deletion
749:A7 does not apply to albums.
560:18:09, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
546:22:01, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
531:06:35, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
511:22:04, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
496:21:46, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
474:21:36, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
454:21:31, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
439:21:29, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
423:21:30, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
387:03:36, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
369:13:13, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
354:00:54, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
32:
3988:
3969:
3913:and submit your choices on
3790:
3748:to call myself a feminist.
3675:
3628:22:26, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
3607:20:37, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
3561:00:27, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
3465:
3405:22:36, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
3250:#wikiloveslib or #glamwiki.
2922:
2865:
2844:
2356:new author & book pages
1567:Non Treaty Chippewa Indians
972:You may wish to review the
269:00:22, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
220:23:42, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
29:
4394:
4367:MediaWiki message delivery
4266:MediaWiki message delivery
4140:MediaWiki message delivery
4067:MediaWiki message delivery
3921:MediaWiki message delivery
3911:the candidates' statements
3847:MediaWiki message delivery
3219:Saturday, December 8, 2012
3077:21:06, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
2995:I just closed your AfD on
2546:Hello! Your submission of
2512:, has been proposed for a
2466:Speedy deletion declined:
2296:the media description page
1773:02:09, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
1744:20:05, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
1718:16:10, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
1693:Speedy deletion declined:
1687:23:26, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
1669:23:26, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
1625:23:15, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
1600:20:47, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
1562:17:33, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
1535:13:49, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
1517:11:48, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
1476:19:25, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
1461:19:00, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
1030:09:37, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
998:Speedy deletion declined:
993:23:13, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
957:Speedy deletion declined:
951:15:20, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
936:22:41, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
909:16:31, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
835:23:11, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
776:21:28, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
761:21:17, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
736:Speedy deletion declined:
673:00:37, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
641:03:47, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
612:22:51, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
587:03:14, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
573:to the 9/11 CT article on
193:20:41, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
55:Discover Lasting Happiness
42:13:05, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
4185:
3386:13:22, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
3192:
3159:: It's time to close the
3145:DR Noticeboard comparison
3129:: The most recent DR data
3009:00:35, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
2984:14:52, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
2961:14:52, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
2935:12:20, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
2915:04:48, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
2878:18:20, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
2855:18:18, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
2837:18:11, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
2812:07:22, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
2796:Gippsland earthquake 2012
2788:12:16, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
2766:23:29, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
2697:
2664:
2315:the image discussion page
2179:
2131:guide to appealing blocks
1645:
1607:Removal from edit history
1441:23:58, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
1398:23:02, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
1358:21:21, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
1341:21:09, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
1306:13:50, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
1286:
1265:01:39, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
1253:Rocket science in finance
1236:
1222:16:46, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
1204:13:20, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
1189:13:03, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
1126:18:52, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
1111:18:49, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
1097:18:39, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
1083:18:38, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
1065:18:10, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
1050:18:05, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
295:04:31, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
206:under the heading titled
63:13:04, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
4365:to your user talk page.
4221:2019 US Banknote Contest
4155:2019 US Banknote Contest
3996:
3977:
3798:
3714:deletion consideration.
3683:
3489:either for or against it
3473:
3362:08:46, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
3332:16:25, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
3313:19:59, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
3055:18:15, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
3032:18:10, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
2930:
2873:
2614:13:20, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
2590:08:24, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
2570:12:29, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
2532:16:53, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
2491:20:31, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
2461:14:00, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
2409:01:15, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
2385:22:13, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
2351:18:27, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
2258:10:02, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
2253:
2242:07:46, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
2203:02:19, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
2161:20:46, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
2146:20:01, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
2054:23:26, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
2009:23:11, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
1992:20:19, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
1959:19:52, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
1933:17:48, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
1914:17:43, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
1897:17:38, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
1868:16:08, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
1804:strikethrough</s: -->
1758:City of Scars#Background
1471:
1353:
1199:
1121:
1106:
1060:
771:
491:
434:
364:
329:
166:07:10, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
147:16:05, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
125:17:06, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
87:09:34, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
37:
17:NPOV Means People I Like
4217:WikiProject Numismatics
4190:United States banknotes
4181:November-December 2019
3576:revenge. You shouldn't
3424:with the edit summary.
2557:your nomination's entry
2337:non-free content policy
1843:02:41, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
1818:19:07, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
1791:17:58, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
1649:The Philosophy Barnstar
1377:Kind regards, Natalia
1325:Kind regards, Natalia
782:Question about NPV for
575:the article's talk page
152:MMR vaccine controversy
4225:all Wikimedia projects
4210:states and territories
3345:
3294:
3232:Seattle Public Library
3209:
3208:Seattle Public Library
3113:
2954:OlYeller21's talk page
2950:
2633:File:Sheela Murthy.jpg
2627:
2272:
2073:
1831:Pakistani village life
1730:You forgot to sign at
1491:
1314:Visual Reading article
1167:tag and it comes from
4326:Arbitration Committee
4310:Hello! Voting in the
4107:Arbitration Committee
4034:Arbitration Committee
3888:Arbitration Committee
3861:ArbCom Elections 2016
3710:my deletion request.
3344:
3293:
3261:on-wiki regsistration
3207:
3163:. Agree or disagree?
3111:
2949:
2863:Err, maybe now...
2630:Thanks for uploading
2626:
2496:Merge discussion for
2275:Thanks for uploading
2271:
2125:Your reason here ~~~~
2089:and violation of the
2072:
1490:
1245:The Editor's Barnstar
74:Maggie Bird (curator)
4169:US Banknote Contest
3024:The Devil's Advocate
2716:non-free fair use in
2712:, use a tag such as
1779:Dandi Adigal Nayanar
1162:is a bit silly. The
881:http://twoloons.com/
766:Thanks for the info!
720:Neutrality Issue Tag
691:you recently tagged
592:List of cative orcas
579:The Devil's Advocate
565:Able Danger material
552:The Devil's Advocate
538:The Devil's Advocate
523:The Devil's Advocate
3740:supposed to work.
3698:Attn: Emma Paling
3391:L-1B to L-1A change
3014:Randi GA nomination
3001:And Adoil Descended
2824:User talk:(JoelWhy)
2298:and edit it to add
2117:by adding the text
1996:That policy is for
1290:The Modest Barnstar
1230:A barnstar for you!
917:Speedy deletion of
571:this attempted edit
4342:arbitration policy
4202:Confederate States
4123:arbitration policy
4050:arbitration policy
3904:arbitration policy
3863:: Voting now open!
3841:New Page Reviewers
3826:has been created.
3733:I responded with:
3595:First law of holes
3586:reverted your edit
3421:even more strongly
3346:
3295:
3210:
3114:
3095:dispute resolution
2965:remove this notice
2951:
2744:, as described on
2628:
2417:Ad hominem attack.
2273:
2107:dispute resolution
2074:
1502:remove this notice
1492:
1273:A barnstar for you
1142:Vartelas v. Holder
919:Classical Anatolia
79:Saint Michael 2010
4381:
4380:
4253:
4252:
4206:Republic of Texas
4194:Wikimedia Commons
3824:New Page Reviewer
3564:
3547:comment added by
3537:
3520:comment added by
3283:
3282:
3151:Discussion update
3139:Activity analysis
3116:In this issue:
3018:I have started a
2428:perceived opinion
2388:
2371:comment added by
2208:
2207:
2201:
2115:appeal this block
2091:three-revert rule
2012:
1962:
1841:
1829:Just a note, the
1674:
1673:
1603:
1586:comment added by
1571:I pity you white
1526:Lewis and Kahn's
1515:
1444:
1427:comment added by
1401:
1384:comment added by
1331:comment added by
1311:
1310:
1270:
1269:
934:
795:Two Loons for Tea
784:Two Loons for Tea
722:in accordance to
676:
661:HappyWheeler4Life
659:comment added by
631:comment added by
602:comment added by
128:
111:comment added by
4385:
4364:
4307:
4300:
4273:
4248:
4198:Colonial America
4176:
4166:
4159:
4158:
4091:
4018:
3993:
3990:
3974:
3971:
3872:
3795:
3792:
3766:
3758:
3680:
3677:
3663:
3658:
3653:
3563:
3541:
3536:
3514:
3470:
3467:
3429:
3360:
3358:
3353:add your input.
3310:
3225:10 a.m. – 3 p.m.
3190:
3189:
3178:The Olive Branch
3170:The Olive Branch
3091:The Olive Branch
3083:The Olive Branch
2978:
2977:
2968:
2927:
2924:
2890:...on this page
2870:
2867:
2849:
2846:
2750:image use policy
2719:
2703:
2701:
2700:
2699:
2685:
2679:
2670:
2668:
2667:
2666:
2625:
2575:Mu Canis Majoris
2545:
2524:
2507:
2483:Martijn Hoekstra
2437:holocaust denier
2426:" C'mon. Your
2387:
2365:
2334:
2305:
2239:
2238:
2235:
2232:
2229:
2200:
2195:
2193:
2183:The BLP Barnstar
2177:
2170:
2169:
2128:
2071:
2006:
2004:
1956:
1954:
1919:Bayer star stubs
1900:
1871:
1840:
1838:Northamerica1000
1835:
1810:
1788:
1765:
1723:Signature needed
1643:
1636:
1635:
1602:
1580:
1514:
1512:Northamerica1000
1509:
1505:
1458:
1456:Ten Pound Hammer
1443:
1421:
1400:
1378:
1343:
1284:
1277:
1276:
1262:
1241:
1234:
1233:
1161:
1155:
1027:
1023:
1018:
990:
986:
981:
943:Michael Goodyear
933:
753:Martijn Hoekstra
675:
653:
643:
614:
298:
253:as it could be.
127:
105:
34:
31:
4393:
4392:
4388:
4387:
4386:
4384:
4383:
4382:
4358:
4298:
4279:
4255:
4243:
4157:
4152:
4151:
4092:
4084:
4079:
4078:
4019:
4011:
3938:
3933:
3932:
3916:the voting page
3873:
3865:
3813:
3760:
3752:
3661:
3656:
3651:
3638:
3636:Congratulations
3542:
3515:
3511:
3412:
3393:
3369:
3356:
3354:
3339:
3320:
3308:
3288:
3269:Maximilianklein
3211:
3188:
3174:
3087:
3065:
3039:
3016:
2997:Hervé Descottes
2993:
2990:Hervé Descottes
2975:
2973:
2969:
2958:
2943:
2888:
2820:
2776:
2738:your upload log
2718:|article name}}
2713:
2695:
2693:
2683:
2677:
2662:
2660:
2623:
2621:
2602:
2577:
2539:
2522:
2501:
2471:
2451:negative one.--
2419:
2404:. Thank you.
2394:
2366:
2358:
2330:
2299:
2266:
2236:
2233:
2230:
2227:
2226:
2213:
2198:Leave a message
2196:
2168:
2148:
2144:
2118:
2111:page protection
2069:
2066:
2002:
1952:
1940:
1921:
1890:
1879:
1861:
1852:
1836:
1827:
1808:
1801:
1786:
1782:
1763:
1754:
1725:
1698:
1634:
1609:
1581:
1569:
1542:
1524:
1522:Lizard men etc.
1510:
1506:
1499:
1484:
1454:
1450:
1422:
1407:
1379:
1326:
1316:
1275:
1256:
1232:
1175:neatly myself.
1159:
1153:
1146:
1037:
1025:
1021:
1016:
1003:
988:
984:
979:
966:Subhasish ghosh
962:
959:Subhasish ghosh
923:
890:Template:Fanpov
817:Template:Fanpov
791:Template:Fanpov
787:
741:
682:
654:
649:
647:Take my word...
644:
626:
620:
597:
594:
567:
518:
516:9/11 CT article
397:
342:
304:
288:
276:
227:
173:
171:Citation Debate
154:
134:
106:
102:
94:
70:
50:
19:
12:
11:
5:
4391:
4389:
4379:
4378:
4349:the candidates
4319:eligible users
4308:
4297:
4294:
4278:
4275:
4251:
4250:
4241:
4186:
4183:
4182:
4178:
4177:
4170:
4167:
4156:
4153:
4130:the candidates
4093:
4086:
4085:
4083:
4080:
4057:the candidates
4020:
4013:
4012:
4010:
4007:
4006:
4005:
4004:
4003:
3937:
3934:
3874:
3867:
3866:
3864:
3858:
3812:
3809:
3808:
3807:
3806:
3805:
3782:
3781:
3696:
3695:
3694:
3693:
3637:
3634:
3633:
3632:
3631:
3630:
3610:
3609:
3510:
3507:
3506:
3505:
3504:
3503:
3481:
3480:
3418:, but I agree
3411:
3408:
3392:
3389:
3368:
3365:
3338:
3335:
3322:Please reply.
3319:
3316:
3287:
3284:
3281:
3280:
3265:
3264:
3251:
3245:
3235:
3226:
3220:
3212:
3202:
3199:
3198:
3197:
3195:You're invited
3187:
3182:
3166:
3165:
3164:
3154:
3148:
3142:
3136:
3133:Survey results
3130:
3124:
3086:
3080:
3064:
3061:
3059:
3038:
3035:
3015:
3012:
2992:
2987:
2959:Message added
2957:
2944:
2942:
2939:
2938:
2937:
2901:
2899:
2887:
2884:
2883:
2882:
2881:
2880:
2858:
2857:
2819:
2816:
2815:
2814:
2775:
2769:
2694:permissions-en
2688:
2687:
2661:permissions-en
2656:
2620:
2617:
2601:
2598:
2576:
2573:
2538:
2535:
2500:
2494:
2470:
2464:
2418:
2415:
2413:
2393:
2390:
2357:
2354:
2343:. Thank you.
2319:
2318:
2311:
2265:
2262:
2261:
2260:
2218:Sami Kukkohovi
2212:
2209:
2206:
2205:
2186:
2185:
2180:
2178:
2167:
2164:
2140:
2075:You have been
2067:
2065:
2062:
2061:
2060:
2059:
2058:
2057:
2056:
1976:
1975:
1974:
1939:
1936:
1920:
1917:
1903:
1895:comment added
1878:
1873:
1866:comment added
1851:
1846:
1826:
1821:
1800:
1794:
1781:
1776:
1753:
1747:
1724:
1721:
1710:Reaper Eternal
1702:Joshua Feldman
1697:
1695:Joshua Feldman
1691:
1672:
1671:
1652:
1651:
1646:
1644:
1633:
1630:
1629:
1628:
1608:
1605:
1568:
1565:
1541:
1538:
1523:
1520:
1498:
1485:
1483:
1480:
1479:
1478:
1449:
1446:
1406:
1403:
1361:
1360:
1315:
1312:
1309:
1308:
1293:
1292:
1287:
1285:
1274:
1271:
1268:
1267:
1248:
1247:
1242:
1231:
1228:
1227:
1226:
1225:
1224:
1207:
1206:
1148:Hi. Regarding
1145:
1138:
1137:
1136:
1135:
1134:
1133:
1132:
1131:
1130:
1129:
1128:
1036:
1033:
1002:
996:
961:
955:
954:
953:
922:
915:
914:
913:
912:
911:
894:
893:
885:
884:
875:
874:
873:
872:
853:
852:
843:
842:
838:
810:
809:
786:
780:
779:
778:
740:
734:
681:
678:
648:
645:
624:
619:
616:
593:
590:
566:
563:
517:
514:
499:
498:
482:
481:
442:
441:
396:
393:
392:
391:
390:
389:
372:
371:
341:
338:
337:
336:
303:
300:
293:comment added
281:173.66.128.156
275:
272:
229:When you made
226:
223:
208:Citation Style
197:
172:
169:
153:
150:
133:
130:
101:
98:
93:
90:
69:
66:
49:
46:
45:
44:
18:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
4390:
4377:
4376:
4372:
4368:
4362:
4356:
4355:
4350:
4345:
4343:
4339:
4335:
4331:
4327:
4321:
4320:
4315:
4314:
4309:
4306:
4302:
4301:
4295:
4293:
4292:
4288:
4284:
4276:
4274:
4271:
4267:
4263:
4259:
4249:
4247:
4240:
4238:
4234:
4230:
4226:
4222:
4218:
4213:
4211:
4207:
4203:
4199:
4195:
4191:
4184:
4180:
4179:
4175:
4168:
4165:
4160:
4154:
4150:
4149:
4145:
4141:
4137:
4136:
4131:
4126:
4124:
4120:
4116:
4112:
4108:
4103:
4100:
4099:
4090:
4081:
4077:
4076:
4072:
4068:
4064:
4063:
4058:
4053:
4051:
4047:
4043:
4039:
4035:
4030:
4027:
4026:
4017:
4008:
4002:
3998:
3994:
3985:
3984:
3983:
3979:
3975:
3966:
3965:
3964:
3963:
3959:
3955:
3951:
3947:
3943:
3940:Hi Joel, re:
3935:
3931:
3930:
3926:
3922:
3918:
3917:
3912:
3907:
3905:
3901:
3897:
3893:
3889:
3884:
3881:
3880:
3871:
3862:
3859:
3857:
3856:
3852:
3848:
3844:
3843:
3842:
3835:
3832:
3827:
3825:
3821:
3816:
3810:
3804:
3800:
3796:
3786:
3785:
3784:
3783:
3780:
3777:
3775:
3773:
3772:
3764:
3756:
3751:
3750:
3749:
3745:
3741:
3737:
3734:
3731:
3728:
3725:
3721:
3718:
3715:
3711:
3707:
3703:
3699:
3691:
3690:
3689:
3685:
3681:
3671:
3670:
3669:
3668:
3665:
3664:
3655:
3654:
3646:
3645:
3641:
3635:
3629:
3625:
3621:
3617:
3614:
3613:
3612:
3611:
3608:
3604:
3600:
3596:
3592:
3587:
3583:
3579:
3574:
3570:
3567:
3566:
3565:
3562:
3558:
3554:
3550:
3546:
3538:
3535:
3531:
3527:
3523:
3519:
3508:
3502:
3498:
3494:
3490:
3485:
3484:
3483:
3482:
3479:
3475:
3471:
3461:
3460:
3459:
3458:
3454:
3450:
3446:
3441:
3440:
3436:
3432:
3428:
3423:
3422:
3417:
3409:
3407:
3406:
3402:
3398:
3390:
3388:
3387:
3383:
3379:
3375:
3366:
3364:
3363:
3359:
3351:
3343:
3336:
3334:
3333:
3329:
3325:
3317:
3315:
3314:
3311:
3305:
3300:
3292:
3285:
3279:
3278:
3274:
3270:
3262:
3258:
3255:
3252:
3249:
3246:
3243:
3239:
3236:
3233:
3230:
3227:
3224:
3221:
3218:
3215:
3214:
3213:
3206:
3201:
3200:
3196:
3191:
3186:
3183:
3181:
3179:
3173:
3171:
3162:
3158:
3155:
3152:
3149:
3146:
3143:
3140:
3137:
3134:
3131:
3128:
3125:
3122:
3119:
3118:
3117:
3110:
3106:
3104:
3100:
3096:
3092:
3084:
3081:
3079:
3078:
3074:
3070:
3069:Blahwiki4ever
3062:
3060:
3057:
3056:
3052:
3048:
3044:
3036:
3034:
3033:
3029:
3025:
3021:
3013:
3011:
3010:
3006:
3002:
2998:
2991:
2988:
2986:
2985:
2982:
2980:
2979:
2966:
2962:
2955:
2948:
2940:
2936:
2932:
2928:
2919:
2918:
2917:
2916:
2912:
2908:
2904:
2897:
2893:
2879:
2875:
2871:
2862:
2861:
2860:
2859:
2856:
2853:
2850:
2841:
2840:
2839:
2838:
2835:
2832:
2829:
2825:
2817:
2813:
2809:
2805:
2801:
2797:
2792:
2791:
2790:
2789:
2785:
2781:
2774:
2770:
2768:
2767:
2763:
2759:
2756:. Thank you.
2755:
2751:
2747:
2743:
2739:
2733:
2731:
2727:
2723:
2717:
2711:
2706:
2704:
2702:wikimedia.org
2682:
2675:
2671:
2669:wikimedia.org
2657:
2654:
2650:
2646:
2642:
2641:
2640:
2637:
2635:
2634:
2618:
2616:
2615:
2611:
2607:
2599:
2597:
2596:
2592:
2591:
2587:
2583:
2574:
2572:
2571:
2567:
2563:
2559:
2558:
2553:
2549:
2544:
2536:
2534:
2533:
2529:
2525:
2519:
2515:
2511:
2506:
2499:
2495:
2493:
2492:
2488:
2484:
2480:
2476:
2469:
2465:
2463:
2462:
2458:
2454:
2453:Mystichumwipe
2450:
2446:
2442:
2438:
2433:
2429:
2425:
2416:
2414:
2411:
2410:
2407:
2403:
2399:
2391:
2389:
2386:
2382:
2378:
2374:
2370:
2361:
2355:
2353:
2352:
2349:
2346:
2342:
2338:
2333:
2326:
2324:
2316:
2312:
2309:
2303:
2297:
2293:
2292:
2291:
2288:
2284:
2280:
2279:
2270:
2263:
2259:
2255:
2251:
2246:
2245:
2244:
2243:
2240:
2223:
2219:
2210:
2204:
2199:
2194:
2188:
2187:
2184:
2181:
2176:
2171:
2165:
2163:
2162:
2158:
2154:
2147:
2143:
2138:
2137:
2132:
2126:
2122:
2116:
2112:
2108:
2104:
2100:
2096:
2092:
2088:
2084:
2080:
2079:
2063:
2055:
2051:
2047:
2042:
2038:
2034:
2030:
2026:
2022:
2018:
2014:
2013:
2011:
2010:
2005:
1999:
1995:
1994:
1993:
1989:
1985:
1981:
1977:
1972:
1971:
1969:
1965:
1964:
1963:
1961:
1960:
1955:
1949:
1945:
1937:
1935:
1934:
1930:
1926:
1918:
1916:
1915:
1911:
1907:
1901:
1898:
1894:
1888:
1884:
1877:
1876:French people
1874:
1872:
1869:
1865:
1860:
1857:
1850:
1847:
1845:
1844:
1839:
1832:
1825:
1822:
1820:
1819:
1816:
1815:
1812:
1811:
1799:
1795:
1793:
1792:
1789:
1780:
1777:
1775:
1774:
1771:
1770:
1767:
1766:
1759:
1752:
1748:
1746:
1745:
1741:
1737:
1733:
1728:
1722:
1720:
1719:
1715:
1711:
1707:
1703:
1696:
1692:
1690:
1688:
1684:
1680:
1670:
1666:
1662:
1658:
1654:
1653:
1650:
1647:
1642:
1637:
1631:
1626:
1622:
1618:
1614:
1613:
1612:
1606:
1604:
1601:
1597:
1593:
1589:
1585:
1576:
1574:
1566:
1564:
1563:
1559:
1555:
1551:
1547:
1539:
1537:
1536:
1533:
1529:
1521:
1519:
1518:
1513:
1503:
1496:
1489:
1481:
1477:
1473:
1469:
1465:
1464:
1463:
1462:
1457:
1447:
1445:
1442:
1438:
1434:
1430:
1426:
1418:
1417:
1413:
1410:
1404:
1402:
1399:
1395:
1391:
1387:
1383:
1375:
1371:
1368:
1364:
1359:
1355:
1351:
1346:
1345:
1344:
1342:
1338:
1334:
1330:
1323:
1319:
1313:
1307:
1303:
1299:
1295:
1294:
1291:
1288:
1283:
1278:
1272:
1266:
1263:
1261:
1260:
1254:
1250:
1249:
1246:
1243:
1240:
1235:
1229:
1223:
1219:
1215:
1211:
1210:
1209:
1208:
1205:
1201:
1197:
1193:
1192:
1191:
1190:
1186:
1182:
1176:
1172:
1170:
1165:
1158:
1151:
1144:
1143:
1139:
1127:
1123:
1119:
1114:
1113:
1112:
1108:
1104:
1100:
1099:
1098:
1094:
1090:
1086:
1085:
1084:
1080:
1076:
1072:
1068:
1067:
1066:
1062:
1058:
1054:
1053:
1052:
1051:
1047:
1043:
1034:
1032:
1031:
1028:
1024:
1019:
1012:
1008:
1001:
997:
995:
994:
991:
987:
982:
975:
971:
967:
960:
956:
952:
948:
944:
940:
939:
938:
937:
932:
931:Seraphimblade
928:
920:
916:
910:
906:
902:
898:
897:
896:
895:
891:
887:
886:
882:
877:
876:
871:
867:
866:
864:
860:
855:
854:
850:
845:
844:
840:
839:
837:
836:
832:
828:
823:
820:
818:
813:
807:
806:
805:
804:and it says
803:
798:
796:
792:
785:
781:
777:
773:
769:
765:
764:
763:
762:
758:
754:
750:
746:
739:
735:
733:
730:
727:
725:
721:
717:
713:
709:
704:
702:
698:
694:
690:
689:Pushpa Basnet
685:
679:
677:
674:
670:
666:
662:
658:
646:
642:
638:
634:
633:72.134.54.239
630:
623:
617:
615:
613:
609:
605:
604:72.134.54.239
601:
591:
589:
588:
584:
580:
576:
572:
564:
562:
561:
557:
553:
548:
547:
543:
539:
533:
532:
528:
524:
515:
513:
512:
508:
504:
503:Createangelos
497:
493:
489:
484:
483:
478:
477:
476:
475:
471:
467:
466:Createangelos
463:
460:
456:
455:
451:
447:
446:Createangelos
440:
436:
432:
427:
426:
425:
424:
420:
416:
415:Createangelos
410:
406:
403:
400:
394:
388:
384:
380:
376:
375:
374:
373:
370:
366:
362:
358:
357:
356:
355:
351:
347:
339:
335:
331:
327:
323:
322:
321:
320:
316:
312:
309:
301:
299:
296:
292:
286:
282:
273:
271:
270:
266:
262:
258:
254:
250:
247:
243:
239:
236:And you also
234:
232:
224:
222:
221:
217:
213:
209:
205:
201:
195:
194:
190:
186:
182:
178:
170:
168:
167:
163:
159:
151:
149:
148:
144:
140:
131:
129:
126:
122:
118:
114:
110:
99:
97:
91:
89:
88:
84:
80:
75:
68:Michael Stead
67:
65:
64:
60:
56:
47:
43:
39:
35:
25:
24:
23:
16:
4352:
4346:
4323:
4317:
4311:
4280:
4254:
4242:
4214:
4187:
4133:
4127:
4104:
4096:
4094:
4060:
4054:
4031:
4023:
4021:
3939:
3914:
3908:
3885:
3877:
3875:
3840:
3839:
3836:
3830:
3828:
3823:
3817:
3815:Hi JoelWhy,
3814:
3770:
3746:
3742:
3738:
3735:
3732:
3729:
3726:
3722:
3719:
3716:
3712:
3708:
3704:
3700:
3697:
3660:
3650:
3647:
3642:
3639:
3591:your mistake
3590:
3543:— Preceding
3539:
3516:— Preceding
3512:
3493:JamesBWatson
3488:
3449:JamesBWatson
3442:
3431:JamesBWatson
3420:
3419:
3413:
3394:
3378:HistoricMN44
3373:
3370:
3347:
3321:
3296:
3266:
3254:Registration
3253:
3247:
3241:
3237:
3228:
3222:
3216:
3194:
3177:
3175:
3169:
3156:
3150:
3144:
3138:
3132:
3126:
3120:
3115:
3099:active in DR
3090:
3088:
3082:
3066:
3058:
3040:
3017:
2994:
2971:
2970:
2889:
2851:
2821:
2777:
2741:
2734:
2724:, and add a
2707:
2692:
2689:
2681:OTRS pending
2659:
2652:
2638:
2631:
2629:
2603:
2593:
2578:
2555:
2548:Jill Farrant
2540:
2510:Rudy Eugene
2502:
2498:Rudy Eugene
2481:Thank you.
2478:
2472:
2448:
2444:
2440:
2436:
2431:
2427:
2422:
2420:
2412:
2395:
2367:— Preceding
2362:
2359:
2327:
2320:
2307:
2276:
2274:
2221:
2214:
2182:
2149:
2134:
2124:
2087:edit warring
2076:
2046:JoeSperrazza
2040:
2036:
2024:
2020:
2007:
1984:JoeSperrazza
1957:
1941:
1922:
1902:
1880:
1853:
1828:
1813:
1806:
1802:
1783:
1768:
1761:
1755:
1729:
1726:
1708:Thank you.
1705:
1699:
1675:
1656:
1655:For showing
1648:
1610:
1582:— Preceding
1577:
1572:
1570:
1549:
1545:
1543:
1540:Pen Clicking
1532:Tom Harrison
1527:
1525:
1507:
1455:
1451:
1423:— Preceding
1419:
1414:
1411:
1408:
1380:— Preceding
1376:
1372:
1369:
1365:
1362:
1327:— Preceding
1324:
1320:
1317:
1289:
1258:
1257:
1244:
1177:
1173:
1147:
1140:
1038:
1014:
1013:Thank you.
1010:
1004:
977:
969:
963:
926:
924:
868:
848:
824:
821:
814:
811:
799:
788:
751:Thank you.
748:
742:
731:
728:
724:Template:POV
719:
716:Template:POV
712:Template:POV
705:
686:
683:
655:— Preceding
650:
627:— Preceding
621:
598:— Preceding
595:
568:
549:
534:
519:
500:
464:
461:
457:
443:
411:
407:
404:
401:
398:
343:
305:
277:
261:72.95.234.23
259:
255:
251:
246:edit warring
235:
228:
207:
196:
174:
155:
135:
107:— Preceding
103:
100:Mikkel Parlo
95:
71:
51:
20:
4354:voting page
4283:Bigmike2346
4237:participate
4208:, multiple
4135:voting page
4062:voting page
3954:Cyphoidbomb
3620:AlexanderRa
3569:AlexanderRa
3549:AlexanderRa
3522:AlexanderRa
3463:aliens.
3043:Sanford, FL
3037:Sanford, FL
2828:Writ Keeper
2802:situation?
2582:Benkenobi18
2475:Ola Englund
2468:Ola Englund
2441:anti-semite
2424:definition.
2360:Hi JoelWhy
2211:Solution 13
2153:Floquenbeam
1925:Benkenobi18
1891:—Preceding
1862:—Preceding
1787:Redtigerxyz
1727:Hi JoelWhy
1333:82.19.3.170
1298:66.87.2.116
1007:Canan Topçu
1000:Canan Topçu
929:Thank you,
684:Dear Joel,
536:theories?--
340:Paterno Bio
311:WhisperToMe
289:—Preceding
242:Hugo Chavez
200:Hugo Chavez
177:Hugo Chavez
158:Trente7cinq
4338:topic bans
4119:topic bans
4046:topic bans
3900:topic bans
3771:Ritchie333
3616:Valenciano
3599:Valenciano
3304:Homeopathy
3121:Background
2963:. You can
2907:Shearonink
2373:Finaledits
2222:references
2085:caused by
2083:disruption
1760:. Thanks,
1657:incredible
139:Bohdan2004
113:Adamkessel
4334:site bans
4233:Gold Wiki
4115:site bans
4042:site bans
3952:Regards,
3946:WP:BIASED
3942:this edit
3896:site bans
3416:this edit
3357:Crashdoom
3309:EarwigBot
3242:editathon
3103:this page
3020:GA review
2726:rationale
2649:this list
2449:PRIMARILY
2345:Fut.Perf.
2332:this link
2136:Jauerback
2103:consensus
2101:and seek
2033:Communism
1948:WP:VANDAL
1938:Vandalism
1554:Rorshacma
1409:Hi Joel,
1363:Hi Joel,
1318:Hi Joel,
1214:MZMcBride
1181:MZMcBride
865:it says:
708:Talk page
274:thank you
238:commented
212:Schwindtd
210:Thanks!--
185:Schwindtd
4256:Sent by
3755:stalking
3557:contribs
3545:unsigned
3530:contribs
3518:unsigned
3487:theory,
3445:this gem
3410:Give up?
3367:E-Verify
3229:Location
3157:Proposal
3127:Research
3047:Ronsword
2976:Yeller21
2941:Talkback
2645:CC-BY-SA
2562:Jpatokal
2445:neo-nazi
2381:contribs
2369:unsigned
2283:fair use
2192:Bunnies!
2166:Barnstar
2123:|reason=
2064:May 2012
1968:WP:3RRNO
1906:Oakley77
1809:Schmidt,
1764:Schmidt,
1677:page ;)(
1632:Barnstar
1596:contribs
1584:unsigned
1500:You can
1437:contribs
1425:unsigned
1394:contribs
1382:unsigned
1329:unsigned
1169:Oyez.org
1157:non-free
1152:, using
1026:Chequers
989:Chequers
921:declined
901:Crandmck
859:Fair use
827:Crandmck
822:Thanks,
669:contribs
657:unsigned
629:unsigned
618:its true
600:unsigned
429:police.)
121:contribs
109:unsigned
4361:NoACEMM
3936:TheWire
3831:current
3267:Yours,
3259:or use
3248:Hashtag
3172:--: -->
2800:WP:SNOW
2780:Shirt58
2758:Stefan2
2606:Kumioko
2550:at the
2250:JoelWhy
2133:first.
2121:unblock
2078:blocked
1893:undated
1864:undated
1859:my talk
1849:Germans
1736:Charles
1573:cowards
1468:JoelWhy
1429:Azbukva
1386:Azbukva
1350:JoelWhy
1259:E. Feld
1196:JoelWhy
1118:JoelWhy
1103:JoelWhy
1089:Peridon
1075:Peridon
1057:JoelWhy
1042:Peridon
768:JoelWhy
697:WP:NPOV
693:WP:NPOV
488:JoelWhy
431:JoelWhy
379:AVR2012
361:JoelWhy
346:AVR2012
326:JoelWhy
291:undated
287:)Rory
48:JoelWhy
4277:Courts
4229:awards
4204:, the
4200:, the
3397:jfeise
2903:Cheers
2804:HiLo48
2771:About
2523:Jedi94
2439:or an
2406:Jayjg
2392:Notice
2294:Go to
2041:should
2017:WP:BLP
2003:Morphh
1998:WP:BLP
1980:WP:3RR
1953:Morphh
1883:Top811
1856:Top811
1679:Lihaas
1661:Lihaas
1617:Lihaas
1588:Poesam
1164:SCOTUS
701:WP:GNG
302:Chavez
204:WT:VEN
181:WT:VEN
92:Tiesto
3763:db-a7
3652:Scott
3573:WP:OR
3238:Event
2514:merge
2443:or a
2142:dude.
2037:think
1796:inre
1749:inre
1546:added
1022:Spiel
985:Spiel
870:marks
4371:talk
4324:The
4287:talk
4270:talk
4264:via
4258:ZLEA
4246:here
4144:talk
4105:The
4071:talk
4032:The
3997:talk
3992:Why?
3989:Joel
3978:talk
3973:Why?
3970:Joel
3958:talk
3925:talk
3886:The
3851:talk
3799:talk
3794:Why?
3791:Joel
3684:talk
3679:Why?
3676:Joel
3662:talk
3624:talk
3603:talk
3553:talk
3526:talk
3497:talk
3474:talk
3469:Why?
3466:Joel
3453:talk
3435:talk
3401:talk
3382:talk
3328:talk
3273:talk
3223:Time
3217:Date
3073:talk
3051:talk
3028:talk
3005:talk
2931:talk
2926:Why?
2923:Joel
2911:talk
2874:talk
2869:Why?
2866:Joel
2852:talk
2848:Why?
2845:Joel
2808:talk
2784:talk
2762:talk
2674:here
2655:; or
2610:talk
2586:talk
2566:talk
2528:talk
2518:here
2487:talk
2457:talk
2377:talk
2254:talk
2157:talk
2050:talk
2035:. I
1988:talk
1966:Per
1944:here
1929:talk
1910:talk
1887:talk
1740:talk
1714:talk
1683:talk
1665:talk
1621:talk
1592:talk
1558:talk
1472:talk
1433:talk
1390:talk
1354:talk
1337:talk
1302:talk
1218:talk
1200:talk
1185:talk
1150:this
1122:talk
1107:talk
1093:talk
1079:talk
1061:talk
1046:talk
1017:Ϣere
980:Ϣere
947:talk
905:talk
831:talk
772:talk
757:talk
699:and
665:talk
637:talk
608:talk
583:talk
556:talk
542:talk
527:talk
507:talk
492:talk
470:talk
450:talk
435:talk
419:talk
399:Hi,
383:talk
365:talk
350:talk
330:talk
315:talk
285:talk
265:talk
231:this
216:talk
189:talk
162:talk
143:talk
117:talk
83:talk
59:talk
38:talk
33:Why?
30:Joel
4260:at
3374:why
3240:An
2705:.
2432:not
2313:On
2237:ve
2231:e S
2093:at
2025:any
2023:to
1889:)
1734:.--
1689:).
1459:•
793:to
577:?--
4373:)
4363:}}
4359:{{
4336:,
4289:)
4239:.
4146:)
4138:.
4117:,
4073:)
4065:.
4044:,
3999:)
3980:)
3960:)
3948::
3927:)
3919:.
3898:,
3853:)
3801:)
3765:}}
3761:{{
3686:)
3626:)
3605:)
3559:)
3555:•
3532:)
3528:•
3499:)
3476:)
3455:)
3437:)
3403:)
3384:)
3330:)
3275:)
3176:--
3105:.
3075:)
3053:)
3030:)
3007:)
2974:Ol
2933:)
2913:)
2905:,
2876:)
2810:)
2786:)
2764:)
2740:.
2714:{{
2684:}}
2678:{{
2651:)
2612:)
2588:)
2568:)
2530:)
2489:)
2459:)
2383:)
2379:•
2306:,
2304:}}
2300:{{
2256:)
2234:te
2228:Th
2159:)
2127:}}
2119:{{
2052:)
1990:)
1931:)
1912:)
1742:)
1716:)
1685:)
1667:)
1627:).
1623:)
1598:)
1594:•
1560:)
1550:me
1474:)
1439:)
1435:•
1396:)
1392:•
1356:)
1339:)
1304:)
1220:)
1202:)
1187:)
1179:--
1160:}}
1154:{{
1124:)
1109:)
1095:)
1081:)
1063:)
1048:)
1035:A9
949:)
907:)
899:--
849:do
833:)
825:--
819:.
774:)
759:)
726:.
671:)
667:•
639:)
610:)
585:)
558:)
544:)
529:)
509:)
494:)
472:)
452:)
437:)
421:)
385:)
367:)
352:)
332:)
317:)
267:)
218:)
191:)
164:)
145:)
123:)
119:•
85:)
61:)
40:)
4369:(
4285:(
4272:)
4268:(
4142:(
4069:(
3995:(
3976:(
3956:(
3923:(
3849:(
3797:(
3757:)
3753:(
3682:(
3657:•
3622:(
3601:(
3551:(
3524:(
3495:(
3472:(
3451:(
3433:(
3399:(
3380:(
3326:(
3302:"
3271:(
3263:.
3071:(
3049:(
3026:(
3003:(
2956:.
2929:(
2909:(
2872:(
2834:♔
2831:⚇
2806:(
2782:(
2760:(
2608:(
2584:(
2564:(
2526:(
2485:(
2455:(
2375:(
2348:☼
2310:.
2252:(
2155:(
2139:/
2048:(
1986:(
1927:(
1908:(
1899:.
1885:(
1870:.
1738:(
1712:(
1681:(
1663:(
1619:(
1590:(
1556:(
1508:—
1497:.
1470:(
1431:(
1388:(
1352:(
1335:(
1300:(
1216:(
1198:(
1183:(
1120:(
1105:(
1091:(
1077:(
1059:(
1044:(
945:(
903:(
883:.
829:(
770:(
755:(
663:(
635:(
606:(
581:(
554:(
540:(
525:(
505:(
490:(
468:(
448:(
433:(
417:(
381:(
363:(
348:(
328:(
313:(
297:.
283:(
263:(
214:(
187:(
160:(
141:(
115:(
81:(
57:(
36:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.