168:
your details, you're used to it; obviously that's a good thing, and I respect your dedication. I imagine, though, that the number of people who read French antifascist leaflets is relatively small compared to the number of people using the
Internet – all of whom potentially have access to your details once you put them there. I understand your concern about the negative impact of the practise of using pseudonyms, though I don't believe the consequences are necessarily a problem, and there are benefits. Nobody else here uses the name "Gurch", for example, whereas there is almost certainly someone who shares my real name. In a community the size of Knowledge (XXG)'s, the greater potential for uniqueness that pseudonyms offer is useful. As far as the question of identity is concerned, furthermore, I see no need to make a significant distinction between real name and pseudonym anyway. Essentially, I can consider myself to be "Gurch" every bit as much as consider myself to be my real name; one applies while I am online, the other applies when I am not. If I believe something should be done, I will readily assert that "Gurch" believes it should be done and consider that to refer to me just as my real name would. Certainly I will accept personally any consequences of "Gurch"'s actions. As far as the issue of credibiliity is concerned, then, I think the same principle applies; and level of credibility or reputation attached to my pseudonym is inherently attached to me. It is in fact possible to determine my real name from information available on this website, and so identify me individually (my location and date of birth are readily available) – but I have no intention of making it any easier –
532:). It was about the 1907 strike that you were asking about. In it Formby was portrayed as being in favor of the strike. However, he has also arranged his schedule so that he will be performing in cities in the north (it is stated that it is only the theatres in London that will be affected by the strike) while the strike is on as he feels that he cannot afford to be out of work. Of course one must take this with a grain of salt as the episode may be playing with the facts in the effort to dramatize them. Also, even if they were correct in '72, new information may have come to light since then that would alter this version of events. I can say, for what it is worth, that I have found the other episodes in the series to have been fairly accurate. I hope that this is some use - cheers and happy editing.
573:. While the tone of the content was less than encyclopedic, some of the information there in was relevent and useful, especially in regards to the search. I feel, rather then simply remove it all together, it would be much more productive if the content were reintroduced, in more appropriate language, and then properly cited. I felt it more respectful to put here first, rather then on the general discussion. --
1050:
975:
788:
675:
596:
361:
over the relationship between
Dianetics and RC. I've just completed reading John Atack's excellent book on LRH and there is some useful material there. Lots of points of comparison between the way LRH progressed Scientology post the split with HJ and others. Also lots of room for reflection on how HJ in effect took Dianetics and not only made it work but humanised it. Interesting stuff.
405:
206:
had some success in
Britain, and I know that disabled activist groups have run a campaign for real ramps. So perhaps a Campaign for Real Names... Incidentally can someon tell me how to set up a category of "Wikipedians who would prefer that people use their real names and not pseudonyms wherever possible" ?
762:, with the edit description saying that inactive accounts were delisted. However, it appears that your name was removed simply because it wasn't signed with the normal User: link and date, and they didn't bother to search for it. Thought I'd let you know in case you wanted to re-add yourself to that list.
129:
activity in France for twenty years, have regularly put my name and adress on leaflets etc, and I'm fine. I am concerned that a culture of automatic pseudonyms, which exists at present, has more negative effects than positive. We live in a world full of distrust, and I think it's good not to add to it;
463:
deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with
Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note
224:
about using real names and I just wanted to let you know that I agree. While I don't have a problem with people using pseudonyms per se, I personally use my real name and do not see any reason to use pseudonymity to "protect" myself. I've been active in various online communities for almost 10 years
205:
I think you are right that no-one should be looked down on for not wanting to use their real name. (Looking down on people is not in any case something I am very good at. But, in a culture where pseudonyms are almost automatic, I would like to puclicly encourage real names. The
Campaign for Real Ale
128:
Well I think it's worth a debate. People often feel uncomfortable about things which longer discussion allows them to feel comfortable with. If the tens of thousands of wikipedians are mostly worried about death threats, I think there is a real problem. I have personally been involved in antifascist
56:
Hi, I saw your recent edits - unfortunately, the page is now quite chaotic with various broken bits and bad formatting. I think some of the material you deleted is quite interesting and some pieces you did not delete very POVist - I couldn't help wondering if you don't have a particular axe to grind
24:
John, your account of the LCR congress seems to fit badly. Firstly, Knowledge (XXG) is not a news journal, so really punctual stuff like this doesn't fit. I can see that you've tried to balance your accounts, but it's clearly more partial to the views of some currents than other. Furthermore, it's
360:
Thanks for your comments John and sorry I've not had time to respond to your email of a few months ago. I think the article is getting better but still has a way to go. In particular, the intro is now too long but I don't have time at the moment to really get into it. The other aspect is confusion
232:
I think it is only a matter of time before the majority of people have their real-world and online identities merged whether they like it or not and being clear about who you are and what your principles are is an asset that spans the gap between real and virtual communication. In the meantime, we
185:
to be handed my contributions. In particular there is family member I am actively avoiding and it is much easier to not answer post letters grasping at straws than to hand over all my interests and activies that are recorded here along with several ways of contacting me. So I do not think anyone
167:
You both have a good point. Certainly the vast majority of
Wikipedians aren't concerned by threats or harassment or anything like that; I didn't want to give that impression, just point out that it is a problem for some people. I imagine that after twenty years of real-world experience publicising
104:
Asssuming you meant to post your notice about real names as a message on the community portal, I think you're meant to put it under "Notices" rather than start an entirely new section. As far as the idea of using real names is concerned, many editors, particularly administrators, have a desire to
148:
Hi John. I just wanted to let you know that you're not alone on this issue. I agree that editors should use their real names (with some exceptions, for instance editors suffering from oppressive regimes like the
Burmese). It does cause some problems, as Gurch says and I experienced myself, but I
109:
permission frequently have to permanently remove personally identifiable information from the histories of pages where they have been inserted by malicious users. While you may be comfortable revealing your name, others may not, particularly if, when combined with other information available, it
180:
I would not want to use my real name, and probably not for the reasons you imagine. While I do not mind people from the internet figuring out my real name (which can be done), I am more concerned about the opposite direction. Using a real name here place your activies high on a Google search
987:
is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before
Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
301:. If you look at the source of the latter category by clicking "edit this page", you'll see that categories are added as subcategories in the exact same way that an article or user page is added to a category. The userbox, if one were to be created, would end up looking like
25:
not really the case that the LCR is simply a Ligue of currents. It's a league of communists, and clearly has a live separate from its tendencies. can I suggest you rework your additions? I have moved them to the LCR talk page with this note. --
465:
105:
remain anonymous while on the
Internet; considering that administrators frequently recieve death threats, legal threats, threats of violence and various other unpleasantries, this seems entirely rational. A small group of users with
419:, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the
186:
should be looked down on or be pressured because they do not attach their real names to large amounts of information about themselves which can be easily found by the least clever person who has access to a computer. --
1093:
1015:
933:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
1077:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
999:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
57:
yourself. :-) Given that the page is now a mess I propose to revert it totally to the last good version - then lets discuss changes to it. Some of the things you got rid of are not weasel. Thanks.
260:
1063:
755:
87:
Hi John, I don't quite understand the comment you left on the Lutte
Ouviere Talk page about the Talk page on Socialist Alternative (Australia). Is here anything I can help with? --
496:, which may help to save your page on the song from deletion. I think it needs a bit more content though. Can you find some refs on other people who sang it etc., ? Cheers
136:
I am probably in a minority on this question, but perhaps I could found a category of "wikipedians who woudl prefer almost everyone ot use their real names." cheers
898:
was recently deleted as unsubstantiated, as it does appear to have been. If you can substantiate it with a footnoted source, you can restore the edit. Cheers.
282:
in the page as if you were linking to it and save the page (typically at the bottom of the source text). To change how an entry in a category sorts, you use
735:
If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one.
649:
If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one.
550:
I like most of your stuff, but I removed some stuff to make it non-partisan and neutral POV. Please try to use internal links in the future. Diolch. --
375:
John, why is the tax status "non-partisan" POV. That's what the organization is - it's a 501 (c)(4) nonprofit, nonpartisan, grassroots organization.
858:
759:
70:
page John. Would you be interested in an offline chat? I would like to discuss some aspects of this page and others about RC with you. My email is
520:. In case you haven't yet found the answer I thought that I would pass along this info. I have recently watched an episode of the 1972 BBC series
710:
624:
1115:
1029:
958:
294:
39:
Hi John, Thanks for your note. As you guessed, the best way to leave me a message is either on my talk page or on the LCR talk page. --
709:
If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see
623:
If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see
862:
298:
272:
264:
286:; in the example just given, the sort would be under "S". For the proposed category, you'd probably encourage people to sort as "
428:
319:
1111:
1025:
954:
1086:
1008:
181:(especially for uncommon names). I can't think of anyone who would be doing a Google search on my name that I would actively
795:
781:
249:
P.S. I can help you set up the category if you want. Not sure if I'll actually add myself, since I'm not much of a "joiner".
850:
799:
777:
664:
585:
854:
837:
945:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
1098:
1020:
950:
315:
110:
allows them to be traced, stalked, harrassed or otherwise have their personal lives interfered with in some way –
555:
267:
and putting the other text on the category description page? Another possibility is to put the extra text in a
1074:
996:
517:
423:, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please
305:
261:
Category:Wikipedians who use their real name, not a pseudonym, and would like to encourage everyone to do so
424:
154:
946:
866:
714:
628:
578:
323:
250:
240:
812:
654:
551:
207:
193:
137:
1057:
983:
922:
913:
686:
607:
455:
268:
877:
699:
that directly supports material in the article. The nominator also raised the following concern:
537:
1070:
992:
942:
926:
603:
589:
347:
434:
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding
833:
725:
639:
226:
150:
1082:
1004:
938:
930:
1105:
740:
574:
497:
475:
1085:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
1078:
1007:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
1000:
941:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
934:
820:
691:
612:
420:
416:
903:
767:
650:
439:
362:
221:
187:
74:
58:
808:
870:
819:
While all contributions to Knowledge (XXG) are appreciated, content or articles may be
533:
88:
67:
40:
26:
718:
696:
632:
617:
415:
requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge (XXG). This has been done under
453:(just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on
263:, is probably too long and would risk being deleted or renamed. How about making it
1049:
974:
736:
470:
376:
318:. The "User namespace" section of that page deals with user categories, as does
297:. The category's description text should probably end up reading something like
71:
1119:
1033:
962:
907:
884:
771:
744:
658:
559:
540:
506:
479:
404:
383:
365:
326:
253:
243:
235:
210:
200:
172:
158:
140:
114:
91:
77:
61:
43:
29:
899:
763:
570:
493:
169:
111:
843:
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing
516:
Hello Johncmullen1960. Quite some time ago you asked a question on the page
449:
412:
398:
106:
682:
668:
1089:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
1011:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
529:
525:
1067:
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
929:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge (XXG)
311:(which actually adds users to the anti-anon category automatically).
807:
Original research lacking neutrality; not encyclopedic content; see
278:
To add any page to a category, including your user page, you place
343:
1102:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add
492:
Just thought I'd let you know that I've expanded the article on
342:
Hello Mullen. Not sure why you removed the Web 2.0 lingo link:
1092:
If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review
1014:
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review
786:
673:
594:
459:
explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for
425:
see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable
403:
149:
think using real names is important for our credibility. --
733:
Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced.
647:
Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced.
290:", given that this is for users who use their real name.
1061:
is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All
1073:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
995:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
895:
894:
Your addition of a reference to "British expansionism"
861:
process can result in deletion without discussion, and
293:
If this category is created, it probably belongs under
826:
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the
704:
No info about this person with refrences of noble info
464:
that if the article does get deleted, you can contact
695:
created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one
616:
created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one
314:You can find more information about categories at
295:Category:Wikipedians by Knowledge (XXG) philosophy
921:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
620:that directly supports material in the article.
417:section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion
299:Category:Wikipedians against anonymous editing
468:to request that a copy be emailed to you. -
450:the page that has been nominated for deletion
8:
760:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Organized Labour
265:Category:Wikipedians who use their real name
73:- I would be glad to hear from you. Thanks.
66:Thanks for your comments on my page and the
569:I have to disagree with the recent edit to
275:since new userboxes can be a touchy issue.
1044:
689:because under Knowledge (XXG) policy, all
610:because under Knowledge (XXG) policy, all
271:, but that should probably be proposed at
233:get to deal with the consequences of the "
750:WikiProject Organized Labour/Participants
711:Knowledge (XXG):Referencing for beginners
625:Knowledge (XXG):Referencing for beginners
225:and the only negative has been a heap of
754:Your name was recently removed from the
832:notice, but please explain why in your
981:Hello, Johncmullen1960. Voting in the
717:. Once you have provided at least one
631:. Once you have provided at least one
7:
1058:2019 Arbitration Committee elections
984:2018 Arbitration Committee elections
528:) entitled "The Reluctant Juggler" (
429:notability guideline for biographies
273:Knowledge (XXG) talk:Userboxes/Ideas
259:The name you want for the category,
1075:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process
997:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process
320:Knowledge (XXG):User categorization
229:that is not too hard to deal with.
1041:ArbCom 2019 election voter message
968:ArbCom 2018 election voter message
821:deleted for any of several reasons
802:because of the following concern:
427:, as well as our subject-specific
14:
947:review the candidates' statements
83:Socialist Alternative (Australia)
1048:
973:
1096:and submit your choices on the
1018:and submit your choices on the
344:http://www.lingospace.com/web20
236:Greater Internet Fuckwad Theory
953:. For the Election committee,
923:Arbitration Committee election
914:ArbCom elections are now open!
796:UK popular song in world war I
782:UK popular song in world war I
581:) 6 January 2009, 23:56 (UTC)
316:Knowledge (XXG):Categorization
20:Revolutionary Communist League
1:
1120:00:05, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
1034:18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
963:13:38, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
908:05:45, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
885:08:55, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
745:23:52, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
692:biographies of living persons
659:11:31, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
613:biographies of living persons
560:19:32, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
541:22:36, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
327:15:44, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
254:03:40, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
244:03:38, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
211:17:58, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
201:03:31, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
173:02:03, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
159:01:51, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
100:Community Portal / Real names
92:09:35, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
78:09:13, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
62:17:56, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
772:15:55, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
421:criteria for speedy deletion
141:18:24, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
115:14:56, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
949:and submit your choices on
865:allows discussion to reach
846:{{proposed deletion/dated}}
829:{{proposed deletion/dated}}
507:09:49, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
44:17:30, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
30:00:05, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
1139:
1112:MediaWiki message delivery
1026:MediaWiki message delivery
955:MediaWiki message delivery
857:exist. In particular, the
220:I noticed your comment at
851:proposed deletion process
715:Knowledge (XXG):Help desk
629:Knowledge (XXG):Help desk
480:20:01, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
411:A tag has been placed on
384:17:56, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
366:07:09, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
346:Please explain. Thanks.
1110:to your user talk page.
338:The Web2.0 Lingo link...
838:the article's talk page
518:Talk:George Formby, Sr.
791:
678:
599:
408:
122:Johncmullen1960 wrote:
1071:Arbitration Committee
1055:Hello! Voting in the
993:Arbitration Committee
927:Arbitration Committee
863:articles for deletion
800:proposed for deletion
790:
721:, you may remove the
687:proposed for deletion
677:
635:, you may remove the
608:proposed for deletion
598:
407:
288:Last name, First name
35:Yes, you got it right
756:list of participants
931:arbitration process
488:I belong to Glasgow
466:one of these admins
397:Speedy deletion of
322:. Hope that helps.
1087:arbitration policy
1009:arbitration policy
943:arbitration policy
855:deletion processes
792:
679:
600:
409:
1126:
1125:
778:Proposed deletion
665:Proposed deletion
586:Proposed deletion
512:George Formby, Sr
387:
198:
1130:
1109:
1052:
1045:
977:
883:
880:
873:
848:
847:
831:
830:
789:
730:
724:
676:
644:
638:
597:
504:
445:
444:
438:
381:
379:
310:
304:
238:
197:
194:
190:
1138:
1137:
1133:
1132:
1131:
1129:
1128:
1127:
1103:
1043:
1038:
1037:
978:
970:
951:the voting page
917:
892:
878:
875:
871:
859:speedy deletion
845:
844:
828:
827:
787:
785:
752:
728:
722:
719:reliable source
674:
672:
642:
636:
633:reliable source
604:Valérie Damidot
595:
593:
590:Valérie Damidot
567:
552:Petrovic-Njegos
548:
514:
498:
490:
478:
442:
436:
435:
402:
377:
373:
358:
340:
308:
302:
234:
222:User talk:Gurch
218:
208:Johncmullen1960
195:
188:
138:Johncmullen1960
102:
85:
54:
37:
22:
12:
11:
5:
1136:
1134:
1124:
1123:
1094:the candidates
1064:eligible users
1053:
1042:
1039:
1016:the candidates
979:
972:
971:
969:
966:
920:
916:
911:
891:
888:
869:for deletion.
849:will stop the
817:
816:
784:
775:
751:
748:
707:
706:
671:
662:
592:
583:
566:
563:
547:
544:
522:The Edwardians
513:
510:
489:
486:
484:
474:
401:
395:
393:
390:
372:
369:
357:
354:
352:
339:
336:
334:
331:
306:User anti-anon
257:
256:
217:
214:
178:
177:
176:
175:
162:
161:
145:
144:
132:
131:
125:
101:
98:
96:
84:
81:
68:Harvey Jackins
53:
52:Harvey Jackins
50:
48:
36:
33:
21:
18:
16:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1135:
1122:
1121:
1117:
1113:
1107:
1101:
1100:
1095:
1090:
1088:
1084:
1080:
1076:
1072:
1066:
1065:
1060:
1059:
1054:
1051:
1047:
1046:
1040:
1036:
1035:
1031:
1027:
1023:
1022:
1017:
1012:
1010:
1006:
1002:
998:
994:
989:
986:
985:
976:
967:
965:
964:
960:
956:
952:
948:
944:
940:
936:
932:
928:
924:
915:
912:
910:
909:
905:
901:
897:
889:
887:
886:
881:
874:
868:
864:
860:
856:
852:
841:
839:
835:
824:
822:
815:
814:
810:
805:
804:
803:
801:
797:
783:
779:
776:
774:
773:
769:
765:
761:
757:
749:
747:
746:
742:
738:
734:
727:
720:
716:
712:
705:
702:
701:
700:
698:
694:
693:
688:
684:
670:
666:
663:
661:
660:
656:
652:
648:
641:
634:
630:
626:
621:
619:
615:
614:
609:
605:
591:
587:
584:
582:
580:
576:
572:
565:Gentleman Jim
564:
562:
561:
557:
553:
545:
543:
542:
539:
535:
531:
527:
523:
519:
511:
509:
508:
505:
503:
502:
495:
487:
485:
482:
481:
477:
473:
472:
467:
462:
458:
457:
456:the talk page
452:
451:
441:
432:
430:
426:
422:
418:
414:
406:
400:
396:
394:
391:
388:
386:
385:
380:
370:
368:
367:
364:
355:
353:
350:
349:
345:
337:
335:
332:
329:
328:
325:
321:
317:
312:
307:
300:
296:
291:
289:
285:
281:
276:
274:
270:
266:
262:
255:
252:
248:
247:
246:
245:
242:
237:
230:
228:
223:
215:
213:
212:
209:
203:
202:
199:
191:
184:
174:
171:
166:
165:
164:
163:
160:
156:
152:
147:
146:
143:
142:
139:
134:
133:
130:
126:
124:
123:
119:
118:
117:
116:
113:
108:
99:
97:
94:
93:
90:
82:
80:
79:
76:
72:
69:
64:
63:
60:
51:
49:
46:
45:
42:
34:
32:
31:
28:
19:
17:
1097:
1091:
1068:
1062:
1056:
1019:
1013:
990:
982:
980:
918:
893:
853:, but other
842:
834:edit summary
825:
818:
806:
794:The article
793:
753:
732:
708:
703:
690:
681:The article
680:
646:
622:
611:
602:The article
601:
568:
549:
521:
515:
501:♦ Jongleur ♦
500:
499:
491:
483:
469:
460:
454:
447:
433:
410:
392:
389:
382:
374:
359:
351:
341:
333:
330:
313:
292:
287:
283:
279:
277:
258:
231:
219:
204:
182:
179:
151:Jitse Niesen
135:
127:
121:
120:
103:
95:
86:
65:
55:
47:
38:
23:
15:
1099:voting page
1021:voting page
813:WP:NOTESSAY
575:Leodmacleod
448:the top of
324:Mike Dillon
251:Mike Dillon
241:Mike Dillon
1083:topic bans
1005:topic bans
939:topic bans
879:talk to me
713:or ask at
651:Travelbird
627:or ask at
571:Jim Reeves
494:Will Fyffe
363:MarkThomas
216:Real names
189:Birgitte§β
75:MarkThomas
59:MarkThomas
1079:site bans
1001:site bans
935:site bans
890:Coon song
867:consensus
798:has been
685:has been
606:has been
534:MarnetteD
530:Imdb link
526:Imdb link
413:Tom Clare
399:Tom Clare
107:Oversight
41:DuncanBCS
27:DuncanBCS
726:prod blp
683:Yodelice
669:Yodelice
640:prod blp
1106:NoACEMM
269:Userbox
925:. The
836:or on
737:Kamkek
697:source
618:source
461:speedy
440:hangon
378:Morphh
89:Duncan
900:Swliv
872:Cindy
809:WP:OR
764:Djr13
731:tag.
645:tag.
348:Fromm
239:" ;)
170:Gurch
112:Gurch
1116:talk
1069:The
1030:talk
991:The
959:talk
904:talk
896:here
811:and
768:talk
741:talk
655:talk
579:talk
556:talk
538:Talk
371:AFFT
227:spam
196:Talk
183:want
155:talk
919:Hi,
780:of
758:in
667:of
588:of
577:, (
546:NPA
476:004
471:MBK
446:to
431:.
1118:)
1108:}}
1104:{{
1081:,
1032:)
1024:.
1003:,
961:)
937:,
906:)
840:.
823:.
770:)
743:)
729:}}
723:{{
657:)
643:}}
637:{{
558:)
536:|
443:}}
437:{{
356:HJ
309:}}
303:{{
192:ʈ
157:)
1114:(
1028:(
957:(
902:(
882:)
876:(
766:(
739:(
653:(
554:(
524:(
284:]
280:]
153:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.