Knowledge (XXG)

User talk:Jose Enes

Source šŸ“

66:
investigation and is based on true facts confirmed by the English Courts. For example in SLBedit version is said that Joao Vale e Azevedo is a convicted money launderer, which is totally false. He was charged but acquitted in full by all Court instances in Portugal, first, court of appeal and Supreme. Also Joao Vale e Azevedo has a relevant CV following great professional success and work in several areas and major pan-europeen companies that is totally ignored by SLBedit version where he is referred only as a criminal. Even in relation to Joao Vale e Azevedo's presidency of SLBenfica there are lots of relevant facts ignored and not referred by the version of SLBedit. For example Jose Mourinho was discovered by Joao Vale e Azevedo, who offer to him his first contract as main coach/manager. Likewise Jupp Heyckens that was coach at SLBenfica during Joao Vale e Azevedo presidency. Also the honours are totally incomplete. During Joao Vale e Azevedo's presidency the football youth teams won all championships in all categories, which happened for the first time in years. Sources ; ; ; ; ;
294: 182: 87: 217: 383: 115: 23: 268:
on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's workā€”whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each timeā€”counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit
65:
Hello I'm user Jose Enes. I noticed that the user SLBedit (oddly or not its the same initials of SLBenfica that was presided by Joao Vale e Azevedo) your revision is totally inaccurate, incomplete and offensive. It's based on gossip and not facts and evidence. My revision follows a detailed
157:, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Knowledge (XXG) is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a 38:
to remove content that might be considered objectionable. Please do not remove or censor information that directly relates to the subject of the article. If the content in question involves images, you have the option to
44: 194: 186: 91: 227:. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's 418: 236: 138:, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a 40: 47:
to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on
426: 330: 153:. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the 35: 348: 228: 356: 244: 422: 326: 248: 202: 395: 390: 360: 301: 256: 158: 150: 143: 135: 130:. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Knowledge (XXG) this is known as " 411: 404: 400: 322: 314: 310: 261: 240: 224: 190: 154: 131: 119: 318: 239:
for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant
195:
Knowledge (XXG):Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Jose_Enes reported by User:DatGuy (Result: )
127: 31: 352: 232: 139: 185:
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
278: 95: 52: 27: 162: 99: 56: 48: 432: 336: 446: 368: 293: 274: 265: 123: 67: 273:ā€”should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. 149:
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose
235:
among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See
198: 216: 43:
Knowledge (XXG) to hide images that you may find offensive. Take a look at the
442: 364: 421:. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may 382: 325:. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may 223:
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an
114: 22: 450: 372: 282: 206: 170: 103: 94:
regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
75: 60: 429:, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: 333:, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: 264:, which states that an editor must not perform more than three 189:
regarding a possible violation of Knowledge (XXG)'s policy on
30:. I noticed that you removed topically-relevant content from 381: 292: 215: 417:, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans 355:. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek 187:
Knowledge (XXG):Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring
255:
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being
359:, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request 92:
Knowledge (XXG):Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents
247:. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary 321:. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to 231:to work toward making a version that represents 271:even if you don't violate the three-revert rule 176:Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion 8: 347:During a dispute, you should first try to 134:" and is usually seen as obstructing the 7: 90:There is currently a discussion at 403:. Note that multiple accounts are 14: 180: 126:other editors' contributions at 113: 85: 21: 260:ā€”especially if you violate the 36:Knowledge (XXG) is not censored 122:. You appear to be repeatedly 1: 349:discuss controversial changes 305:from editing for a period of 451:12:32, 30 August 2016 (UTC) 373:23:54, 27 August 2016 (UTC) 283:21:16, 27 August 2016 (UTC) 207:20:53, 27 August 2016 (UTC) 171:21:58, 25 August 2016 (UTC) 104:17:12, 25 August 2016 (UTC) 76:22:58, 25 August 2016 (UTC) 61:20:31, 24 August 2016 (UTC) 466: 419:may be reverted or deleted 159:loss of editing privileges 120:welcome to Knowledge (XXG) 427:guide to appealing blocks 401:abusing multiple accounts 331:guide to appealing blocks 323:make useful contributions 71: 386: 297: 220: 136:normal editing process 437:Your reason here ~~~~ 425:by first reading the 385: 341:Your reason here ~~~~ 329:by first reading the 296: 219: 257:blocked from editing 124:reverting or undoing 319:JoĆ£o Vale e Azevedo 212:JoĆ£o Vale e Azevedo 128:JoĆ£o Vale e Azevedo 32:JoĆ£o Vale e Azevedo 387: 357:dispute resolution 313:and violating the 298: 245:dispute resolution 221: 151:editing privileges 423:appeal this block 399:from editing for 327:appeal this block 315:three-revert rule 262:three-revert rule 167: 155:three-revert rule 457: 440: 344: 317:, as you did at 193:. The thread is 184: 183: 165: 117: 89: 88: 25: 465: 464: 460: 459: 458: 456: 455: 454: 453: 430: 376: 361:page protection 334: 290: 249:page protection 214: 205: 197:. Thank you. 181: 178: 168: 161:. Thank you. -- 111: 86: 83: 19: 12: 11: 5: 463: 461: 388:You have been 380: 378: 299:You have been 291: 289: 286: 213: 210: 201: 177: 174: 164: 110: 107: 82: 79: 18: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 462: 452: 448: 444: 438: 434: 428: 424: 420: 416: 414: 413: 406: 402: 398: 397: 393: 392: 384: 379: 375: 374: 370: 366: 362: 358: 354: 350: 342: 338: 332: 328: 324: 320: 316: 312: 308: 304: 303: 295: 287: 285: 284: 280: 276: 272: 267: 263: 259: 258: 252: 250: 246: 242: 238: 234: 230: 226: 218: 211: 209: 208: 204: 200: 196: 192: 188: 175: 173: 172: 169: 160: 156: 152: 147: 145: 141: 137: 133: 129: 125: 121: 116: 108: 106: 105: 101: 97: 93: 80: 78: 77: 73: 69: 63: 62: 58: 54: 51:. Thank you. 50: 46: 42: 37: 33: 29: 24: 16: 436: 412:illegitimate 410: 408: 396:indefinitely 394: 389: 377: 346: 340: 311:edit warring 306: 300: 270: 254: 253: 222: 191:edit warring 179: 148: 132:edit warring 112: 84: 64: 49:my talk page 45:welcome page 20: 288:August 2016 241:noticeboard 118:Hello, and 109:August 2016 34:. However, 26:Hello, I'm 17:August 2016 275:Meatsgains 81:ANI notice 353:consensus 351:and seek 233:consensus 229:talk page 144:talk page 140:consensus 68:Jose Enes 41:configure 435:|reason= 409:not for 339:|reason= 269:warringā€” 243:or seek 225:edit war 203:Contribs 433:unblock 415:reasons 405:allowed 391:blocked 337:unblock 302:blocked 266:reverts 199:Dat Guy 163:Cameron 142:on the 96:SLBedit 53:SLBedit 28:SLBedit 407:, but 307:1 week 443:Bbb23 365:Bbb23 166:11598 447:talk 369:talk 309:for 279:talk 100:talk 72:talk 57:talk 441:. 363:. 251:. 237:BRD 449:) 439:}} 431:{{ 371:) 343:}} 335:{{ 281:) 146:. 102:) 74:) 59:) 445:( 367:( 345:. 277:( 98:( 70:( 55:(

Index

Information icon
SLBedit
JoĆ£o Vale e Azevedo
Knowledge (XXG) is not censored
configure
welcome page
my talk page
SLBedit
talk
20:31, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
Jose Enes
talk
22:58, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
Knowledge (XXG):Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents
SLBedit
talk
17:12, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
Information icon
welcome to Knowledge (XXG)
reverting or undoing
JoĆ£o Vale e Azevedo
edit warring
normal editing process
consensus
talk page
editing privileges
three-revert rule
loss of editing privileges
Cameron11598
21:58, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

ā†‘