User talk:Jpcohen - Knowledge (XXG)

1231:

that phraseology repeatedly in the article. Besides, if he were joking, don't you think he'd at least add in the relevant words such as "Just kidding!" "Joking aside..." or "In all seriousness, though..." How things are said is extremely key in regards to these sorts of things. And just because it was on a blog called Comics Journal (which going by the title and content, was probably more likely referring to "comics" as in "comic books or "newspaper comics") doesn't mean the person was joking. I could easily say, for example, that I wanted to commit a bank robbery on the David Letterman show, and yet I'd be genuinely serious if I actually said that. Another thing, it seemed serious enough to get Breitbart.com to cover it. Don't believe me? Look here:

1195:

the review is in, the editor(s) go through the article and make the recommended changes and take it from there. That's my understanding. PR and GA are fair amounts of work so you'd only want to nominate if you thought the article was as ready as it could be. I was really just commenting that the article looks in pretty good shape to me (I don't have much knowledge of G's work or the biographies). There seems to be a move afoot to bring the best lit articles we have up to GA standard, those that are not far off anyone - low hanging fruit, as it were. This might be one of those. All the best

395:

Finally, you quote Scott who in his review points to the theme of the transforming powers of the imagination. I suppose we can expand the theme section to discuss this, but I would appreciate it if you would find more sources to support this idea and expand it. Just because one reviewer says this is the theme and doesn't expand on this idea, just isn't enough for us to write about, and we want to stick to significant, critical opinions that have currency in the literature. So, if you can find more about the theme, beyond simply, "The theme of

1447:"each categorized page should be placed in all of the most specific categories to which it logically belongs. This means that if a page belongs to a subcategory of C (or a subcategory of a subcategory of C, and so on) then it is not normally placed directly into C". That is to say, if Plath is put in the cat of 'American women poets', she should not also go in 'poets', 'American poets', or 'American writers', which are parent categories. I think the idea is that if you are looking via category, you go to the parent category first, say, 570: 2114:(Horrible, soulless bot!) Here am I in person, saying how sorry I am to have failed your article. I disagree with many of Col Henry's comments about the article in general - and have told him so - but I cannot escape the conclusion that the referencing as it stands just won't suffice for a Good Article. So sorry to be the bearer of bad news, and I mention with all sincerity that the article, which seems to me, referencing apart, a definitely fine one, sent me to my shelves to remind me how fine Lowell's works are. 386:"creates extravagant myths about his past to hide the truth about his ordinary and disappointing life, using these fantastical stories as an avoidance mechanism", which appears to go beyond what the sources actually say and avoids mentioning storytelling as a device, but redundantly refers to the extravagant myths for a second time as "fantastical stories." So, I reverted that as well. Third, it seems like you confused the central theme of the 2080: 608: 1814:

essentially unconcerned with the kind of cultural conservatism that brought the Agrarians together. For them it was more criticism of poetry as pure poetry, without respect to cultural attitudes. I didn't want to get into a lengthy discussion of this distinction at Tate's article, so made just that change. (Also, the Fugitives were known just as the "Fugitives", so I removed the word "Poets" in that sentence.)

109: 2579: 2297: 2224: 1607: 1697: 2019: 627:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see 1737: 1946: 42: 1813:

article. I did subsequently change "political" to "literary"; this group was, like the Fugitives, interested primarily in poetry, as well as other forms of writing. As a group they were never overtly political, but their conservatism was really cultural. In contrast, the Fugitives were apolitical and

1274:

Clearly this doesn't belong here. The "Personal Life" section should actually be about Sendak's personal life. Unless there are compelling reasons to the contrary, I think the paragraph in question should be removed, and editors should limit the content of the section to significant information about

1237:

Even if he was actually joking, it was extremely tasteless in either case. Remember when that Congressman jokingly implied a desire to assassinate President Clinton? That resulted in him being investigated and the media crying foul on it, even getting the Secret Service involved. If it was considered

1230:

The way he was talking in the interview seemed pretty clear that he wasn't joking. He repeatedly said it would make him a hero, and that it would have been a great and wonderful thing. That doesn't sound like something that a jokester would say in regards to something like that. I know I wouldn't use

476:

Hi, It's good to see your continued edits of Lowell. I'd suggest replacing the "Quaker graveyard" fragment in the quote box with a piece from another poem, rather than cutting it completely, as it adds to page interest. Edit summaries are very useful and considerate of other editors so we can follow

159:

deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note

1344:

I'm unsure what you meant by "change has errors"; you seem to be implying that my edit contained an error, but I don't know what this might be (I didn't revise the article's substantive informational content.) My edit was simply a minor improvement (in my opinion) to the article's language, which I

394:

of the father and son, and you go on to claim that the central plot focuses on the imagination of Bloom, and you compare the imaginative powers of the filmmaker with the character. The problem is that the source you cite, A. O. Scott, doesn't exactly say that, so this is really original research.

1194:

under the 'arts' heading. They can get pretty backed up with requests so you could ask a long standing lit editor/old PR/GA hand to review it for you. Anyone can comment, but usually the review is to give a good sense of how ready the article is for GA nomination, ie what work is left to do. Once

911:

Yes, I removed the reference to the musical adaptation of the one poem because it isn't relevant to Patchen's life story. This isn't to say that it doesn't belong in the article at all; just not in the "Life" section. If it was mentioned in another section (like maybe "Tributes to Patchen" or some

541:

has info on the extensive ways that ISBNs are used on Knowledge (XXG). They are useful for referencing specific books in citations, and as discussed in the article, not so good for books that have many editions as they point to a single one. 13 digit numbers are requested, if we have them. I agree

272:

Apparently you still have not noticed the difference between "In Dreams Begin Responsibilities" (Schwartz) and "In dreams begins responsibility" (Yeats). The latter has singular subject and verb. By eliminating the latter, you destroyed the point of my addition. But I appreciate the fact that you

867:

of a poem cannot always really be conveyed with a mere excerpt. Incidentally, your comment that my changing "Those mills would later be referenced in poems like "The Orange Bears".." to "Those mills would later be referenced in such poems as "The Orange Bears" .." didn't seem to me to be "awkward

385:

of the father-son relationship is the central, key theme according to the director, the author, and the majority of reviews, so I restored the information you changed. Second, you changed "creates extravagant myths about his past to hide himself, using storytelling as an avoidance mechanism" to

293:

I suggest you read the reference before you refer to my edit as vandalism. You might also 'google' the Delmore effect. I didn't make it up. I don't mind the deletion. It's a minor issue at a minor article. I was merely adding information that seemed pertinent. Should you run across another of my

1076:

is looking good these days. Do you think he could do with a Peer Review? The article doesn't seem to me far off a GA. It's a bit cheeky of me to suggest it, as I don't have his biographies but it might be useful to see what work remains to be done. Congrats on all your good work. Best wishes

1264:

appears to agree with me on this point). Whether the joke is in good taste or not is beside the point (and I think that this question gets into POV territory). More to the point, I think that this small snippet from the Comics Journal interview is pretty insignificant to the life of Maurice

2309:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

1124:! I really appreciate the acknowledgement. As far as the Ginsberg page goes, I'd have to look more closely at it. I don't think I've done very much work on the page or really read the entire piece in full, but I can certainly take a closer look and then tell you what I think. Best! 1002:

I believe this image is okay to use now, 8XX - Weldon Kees - 1949.JPG. Also, that image of Kees sitting in his chair. What we can we do about that? I asked my sources about who took the image and no one has claimed credit. I used it in my book. I have other images, too, of

1560:

Hi, I saw that you put Lowell up for GA review. It's a great article. I would just mention that everything in it has to be fully referenced to get GA and much of it isn't at the moment. I'm not sure how much work that represents. I hope the article does well. Best wishes

1442:

Hi JP, thanks for all your ongoing and extensive work on literature articles. It's quite a body of good editing you have achieved over the years. I'm not very up on the arcane lore of WP categorisation; I tend to stay out of the arguments about what goes where, but, as

402:

that would be very helpful. Let me be clear: I think the theme section can be improved, and if you can talk more about the theme of the imagination beyond Scott, and at the same time, stick closely to the sources that you use, I will applaud your efforts.

1838: 189:

and follow the few simple steps to having the page restored. Recreating the page with the hangon tag after it has been deleted does not give me the power to overturn the deletion, since I was not the closing administrator. Or, you can discuss it with

2236:

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

233:

My error. I thought I understood how to avoid all the conditions where MWT makes mistaken edits, but apparently there's some condition I haven't identified. I actually intended no changes at all. Regards, and thanks for addressing the issue nicely,

1259:

talk page, but I'll also respond here with the same message. I think that it's reasonably clear, if you read through the interview in question, that Sendak is joking, and that the interviewer understands that Sendak is joking (and the editor

1158:, as important as it was to the Beat Movement, still shouldn't be in the lede of this article. I think it should have its own section within the body of the Ginsberg article (and should be well-identified as the "Six Gallery Reading"). Best! 161: 700:

I think you and I tried to save the AIV page at the same time and your report got lost. I restored it and the signature bot thought it was my report. I wasn't trying to steal credit for your report and I left a note there saying so.

1467:

method in it all though it can seem rather Byzantine and obviously presents a myriad opportunities for endless rowing about how and why people are labelled as they are. I am no expert on this, but I hope that helps. Best wishes

1852:

It is a pleasure when editors come together and make articles better through discussion and collaboration. Thank you for setting forth your argument clearly and then looking for the best way forward to improve the article on

492:

I'm certain that I added an edit summary for the changes to which you're referring. I agree that the box quote looked nice, so if I think of a quote to add there that isn't already in the body of the article, I will do so.

2624: 2337: 2264: 2179:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 2141: 862:

Hi Jpcohen. I have responded at the article Talk Page. It's difficult, isn't it, trying to give adequate account, by example, in such a small article space. Especially with a poet, where the true intended full

2608:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 2321:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 2248:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 1313:

which is similar to many others. I really doubt a SPI is needed, because the lattest known IP, which still active, may be blocked and that's it. But if you believe it is appopiated you can try it.

868:

phrasing", but just normal British English preferred grammar. If "poems like" is a more common construction in American English, then I am quite willing to not demur. But I am surprised. Thanks.

1154:

page, it's certainly very in depth and one of the better Knowledge (XXG) pages on a contemporary poet. I do think that the lede could use some revision, though. In particular, the section on the

2593: 399:

adapted by John August from the novel by Daniel Wallace, is the transforming, sometimes bewildering power of the imagination, which would seem to be a natural subject for Mr. Burton",

1026:

article. If you click on the photo of Lowell, you'll see the "fair use rationale" that was used to make the image fair game. I believe you could do the same for your image of Kees.

542:

that in the case of Merrill your removal of the ISBN was fine as there are many editions. Also red links are not 'dead links', only articles that have not been created yet. See

2427:

We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

2384:

Some have mentioned on the talk page that the Epstein material should be put back. Would you please look at the changes and make your opinion known on the Eliot talk page:

1403:? My edit which you undid, was an undo of the IP 211.108.125. edits which came immediately before mine, which among other things added many inappropriate definite articles 1096:

And thanks for all the steady work you are putting into poetry articles across the board. It's all making a significant difference to the quality of the pages over time.

883:

Hi Jp. Thank you for your very kind words. It's my pleasure. I think the article is looking better now. But I'm sure there is plenty more that could be done. Regards.

2367:

I have seen that you have made edits to the T.S. Eliot article before. I am interested in your comments on a recent change. A recent sub-section about the sculptor

2026:, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See 1493:

Since Valerie's death, there's supposedly a long poem written in his last two or three years that hasn't been published that might see the light of day very soon.

123:, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the 546:. Often they are purposely there to encourage others the write articles on notable subjects. I hope the info is useful. A happy new year to you. Best wishes 1232: 827: 2140:", Eliot's 1928 poem. I would be grateful for your comments, suggestions, and critique there to improve the article. The FAC nomination can be found here: 1496:

There's an older woman in England claims Eliot is her father and is knocking on a few doors...she would have been born at the time Viv was in the nuthouse.

968:

I am him. I finally decided to clean up that entry. I had hoped someone would do it before me. But I have some time and I wanted to learn the ropes. --

639: 379: 1519:

Am delighted to see you adding to Frost. The article is in a terrible state for such a high profile poet. Hope all is well with you. Best wishes

459:

Hi, Thanks for your continuing useful edits to Lowell. Please do remember to add edit summaries. They are very helpful to other editors. Cheers.

2409: 823: 69:

tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the

2087:

for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article.

2074: 2013: 817: 2647: 2351: 2278: 2204: 58: 1652: 813: 706: 1665: 579:

has given you a cupcake for your work on Robert Lowell. Say thank you by passing on the cupcake to someone whose work you appreciate.

2380:

https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=T._S._Eliot&action=historysubmit&type=revision&diff=877562978&oldid=877549994

127:

for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

2136:

Since you've edited articles associated with T.S. Eliot and his works, I wanted to raise your attention to the FAC nomination for "

1669: 619: 1949:

This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.

2643: 2347: 2274: 2200: 257:

from the Schwartz title, something that is constantly missed by people who "quote" Yeats as if he had used Schwartz's wording.

2617: 2330: 2257: 1622: 820:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 897:

Hi again. Lots of good edits lately, I see. But a bit disappointed to see you have discarded the David Bedford musical link.

702: 45:

Welcome to Knowledge (XXG). We invite everyone to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, one or more of the

1655:

regarding including navigation boxes for adaptations of and related subjects to an authors works on the author's bio page.--

623:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 151: 1233:

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Journalism/2012/06/25/Where-The-Wild-Things-Are-Author-Wanted-To-Assassinate-Bush-And-Cheney

628: 2564: 2550: 2191:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to

253:

You apparently did not read my addition carefully before "correcting" it; the entire point was that the Yeats quote is

2629: 2342: 2269: 2196: 1382: 1243: 1444: 54: 46: 239: 1348:

I will not reintroduce my edit unless I hear back from you. Hopefully you are willing to clarify your objection.

400: 294:

edits, somewhere, anywhere, in the future, you can be assured that it will be in good faith and not vandalism.--

1886: 945: 902: 888: 873: 569: 145: 116: 102: 2605: 2318: 2245: 1819: 1760:

again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on

1749: 1239: 760: 338: 26: 2437: 2432: 2153: 1370: 511:

That's a great poetic fragment. Looks good. Edit summaries generally are helpful. Thanks for all the work.

2149: 1661: 1505: 191: 2558: 2192: 1880: 21:

could you help me out by directing me to where i could access the archives. it would be much appreciated.

1862: 1426: 1411: 647: 278: 262: 235: 172: 2442: 543: 2394: 1795: 1008: 985:

Cool. Well, welcome to Knowledge (XXG), James. I think you're learning the ropes quite well actually.

973: 477:

your edits, especially in the long term when you may no longer be connected to the page. Best wishes

70: 2587: 2305: 2232: 2214: 2168: 2159: 1673: 124: 74: 2119: 2104: 2047: 1966: 1882: 1261: 1155: 941: 898: 884: 869: 745: 686: 408: 2601: 2314: 2241: 2188: 2172: 2084: 2027: 1879:, that might amuse you. It sums up Thomas very well, I think (in fact, they are all quite good): 1876: 1815: 1717: 1567: 1525: 1474: 1201: 1102: 1083: 769: 551: 516: 482: 464: 431: 378:

themes section. Unfortunately, I found the edits problematic and reverted to a previous version.

334: 22: 1940: 1711:

Thanks for all the work you put in to literary articles. It's seen and appreciated. Best wishes

1374: 1352: 1150:

I've never done a Peer Review. Could you explain how the process works? Also, looking over the

130:

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding

2145: 2137: 2023: 1656: 1630: 1501: 1059: 843: 316: 299: 2613: 2447: 2326: 2253: 2184: 2176: 1677: 1298: 538: 62: 2636: 1858: 1423: 1408: 678: 643: 274: 258: 227: 165: 87: 2616:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2609: 2329:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2322: 2256:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2249: 2187:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2180: 186: 120: 2390: 1791: 1741: 1648: 1378: 1356: 1326: 1004: 969: 357: 135: 50: 2059: 1998: 1936: 1921: 624: 211:]. Basically you're copying and pasting a template and filling in the blanks. Thanks. 1897:

It was a pleasure to work with you, too, Fruitmonkey. Thank you for the acknowledgement.

119:, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge (XXG). This has been done under 2115: 2099: 2094: 2042: 2037: 1961: 1956: 1256: 1151: 1073: 1051: 741: 737: 682: 404: 2079: 1875:"...a Penzance herbalist's highly intoxicating brew..." Here's a funny anecdote, from 108: 2368: 2070: 2063: 2009: 2002: 1932: 1925: 1713: 1563: 1521: 1470: 1265:

Sendak--yet it takes up a good chunk of the "Personal Life" section for this article.

1197: 1121: 1098: 1079: 1023: 834:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

765: 736:

Hi Jpcohen, I hope all is well with you. I have queried the story about Bob Dylan's

576: 547: 534: 512: 478: 460: 427: 423: 149:(just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on 1653:

Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Novels#Derivative_works_and_cultural_references_templates

1460: 1452: 2090: 2033: 1980: 1952: 1901: 1854: 1626: 1581: 1539: 1314: 1276: 1159: 1125: 1055: 1027: 986: 927: 913: 839: 835: 783: 717: 658: 587: 494: 442: 312: 295: 2578: 2296: 2223: 940:

I think the word "the" should have been "a". But your re-write is perfectly fine.

179: 1837: 1306: 1302: 805: 212: 195: 80: 1190:

Usually it's the page's main editor that nominates the article for peer review

2372: 1810: 426:. Not sure how that section managed to stay in there for so long. Best wishes 353: 185:

Hi there. If you'd like to contest the deletion of the page, hop on over to

1696: 1456: 209:

Yes, it is a big page isn't it? The relevant part of the page can be found

2375:

article. I deleted the addition and explained my reasons on the talk page.

1606: 1931:

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article

1191: 1054:

to your request for input on the length of the Bob Dylan article's lead.

368: 66: 2620:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

2333:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

2260:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

2018: 926:

The "Musical Collaborations and Recordings" section might actually work.

41: 2597:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

2175:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge (XXG)

2142:

Knowledge (XXG):Featured article candidates/A Song for Simeon/archive1

1945: 1753: 2651: 2398: 2355: 2282: 2208: 2123: 2109: 2052: 1988: 1971: 1909: 1890: 1866: 1823: 1799: 1722: 1682: 1634: 1589: 1572: 1547: 1530: 1509: 1479: 1429: 1414: 1386: 1360: 1341:

Hi there. I noticed that you undid my recent edit to this section.

1331: 1284: 1247: 1206: 1167: 1133: 1107: 1088: 1063: 1035: 1012: 994: 977: 949: 935: 921: 906: 892: 877: 847: 791: 774: 749: 725: 710: 690: 666: 651: 595: 555: 520: 502: 486: 468: 450: 435: 412: 361: 342: 320: 303: 282: 266: 243: 217: 200: 95: 77:

to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --

30: 2385: 1647:

Since you are the leading registered editor in terms of edits at

1500:

I look forward to seeing how they materialize, moreso the poem.--

2633:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 2517: 2510: 2503: 2496: 2489: 2482: 2475: 2363:

Please comment on deleted T.S. Eliot "Jacob Epstein" sub-section

1448: 809: 657:

Yes, I'm the one who tried to remove it. Thank you for the note.

2623:

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

2591:

is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All

2336:

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review

2263:

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review

2466: 2407: 606: 155:

explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for

107: 1422:

You think that adding "the" before God is good English?

601:

Orphaned non-free image File:Dream songs cover image.jpg

2604:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the

2386:

https://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:T._S._Eliot#Jacob_Epstein

2379: 2317:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the

2244:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the

1761: 1757: 1745: 1404: 1400: 1310: 808:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 638:

will be deleted after seven days, as described in the

160:

that if the article does get deleted, you can contact

1756:

by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just

1651:, you might want to participate in the discussion at 2131: 1900:

Martinevans123, thank you for the amusing anecdote.

1238:

tasteless back then, it certainly is tasteless now.

311:

Thank You. Perfect. One gentleman meets another. --

1399:Hi Jpcohen, Could you please take another look at 2167:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current 73:before reinserting it. Please take a look at the 1768:List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page: 1022:For the image of Weldon Kees, I would go to the 564: 59:Knowledge (XXG) is not a mere directory of links 634:Note that any non-free images not used in any 121:section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion 763:. Good to see. Best wishes for the new year. 8: 2471: 226:Thanks for alerting me to the problem with 1809:Thanks for your help with cleaning up the 912:such section), I think that would be fine. 164:to request that a copy be emailed to you. 2404:Welcome to The Knowledge (XXG) Adventure! 1604: 1538:Thanks! Yes, it could use a lot of work. 1463:. It's a 'tree based' approach and there 65:or promotion. Since Knowledge (XXG) uses 2433:The Knowledge (XXG) Adventure Start Page 2030:for things which need to be addressed. 1395:Your undo of my edit at "Paradise Lost" 716:No worries. Thank you for your efforts. 2022:. The article is close to meeting the 1835: 1694: 1489:Two things that might be of interest: 1744:. I have automatically detected that 1227:Okay, maybe I'll explain it further: 7: 2588:2022 Arbitration Committee elections 2465:-- 20:50, Friday, February 4, 2022 ( 2438:The Knowledge (XXG) Adventure Lounge 2306:2017 Arbitration Committee elections 2233:2016 Arbitration Committee elections 1621:For all your hard work on behalf of 1366:Cool, thanks for clearing that up. 194:one on one. Happy editing to you. 2606:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process 2572:ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message 2566:Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge 2560:About The Knowledge (XXG) Adventure 2319:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process 2246:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process 782:Thanks! Happy new year to you, too. 2443:The Teahouse new editor help space 2290:ArbCom 2017 election voter message 2132:Eliot's "A Song for Simeon" at FAC 1297:Both IPs are the same person, per 14: 2193:review the candidates' statements 1337:Billy Joel "Early Columbia Years" 732:Bob Dylan: A deal with the devil? 2577: 2295: 2222: 2078: 2017: 1944: 1836: 1735: 1695: 1625:-- it's greatly appreciated! -- 1605: 1345:felt was clunky and redundant. 800:Disambiguation link notification 620:File:Dream songs cover image.jpg 568: 374:Thanks for trying to expand the 40: 2627:and submit your choices on the 2340:and submit your choices on the 1786:Books I-V in one volume, (1963) 677:I have replied to your remarks 333:I responded on my talk page. — 2303:Hello, Jpcohen. Voting in the 2230:Hello, Jpcohen. Voting in the 2199:. For the Election committee, 2169:Arbitration Committee election 2160:ArbCom elections are now open! 2124:21:42, 24 September 2013 (UTC) 2110:21:32, 24 September 2013 (UTC) 2053:09:50, 15 September 2013 (UTC) 1989:01:35, 15 September 2013 (UTC) 1972:13:20, 14 September 2013 (UTC) 740:on the Talk page. Best wishes 451:03:32, 15 September 2010 (UTC) 436:03:28, 15 September 2010 (UTC) 362:08:42, 23 September 2009 (UTC) 1: 2652:00:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC) 2283:22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC) 2209:16:08, 23 November 2015 (UTC) 2154:14:39, 27 December 2013 (UTC) 1480:22:12, 24 February 2013 (UTC) 1036:00:53, 22 February 2012 (UTC) 1013:00:36, 22 February 2012 (UTC) 995:23:45, 21 February 2012 (UTC) 978:23:41, 21 February 2012 (UTC) 893:19:02, 19 February 2012 (UTC) 878:19:14, 16 February 2012 (UTC) 804:Hi. When you recently edited 750:15:26, 24 November 2011 (UTC) 629:our policy for non-free media 556:16:17, 30 December 2010 (UTC) 521:14:27, 16 December 2010 (UTC) 503:13:12, 16 December 2010 (UTC) 487:12:58, 15 December 2010 (UTC) 413:13:47, 27 December 2009 (UTC) 352:I responded on my talk page! 55:guidelines for external links 2356:18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC) 1430:01:13, 1 February 2013 (UTC) 1415:18:27, 31 January 2013 (UTC) 1387:04:04, 30 January 2013 (UTC) 1361:05:31, 29 January 2013 (UTC) 1332:03:31, 19 January 2013 (UTC) 848:11:08, 23 January 2012 (UTC) 759:Thanks for your clean up on 640:criteria for speedy deletion 321:22:59, 19 October 2009 (UTC) 304:04:23, 13 October 2009 (UTC) 61:; nor should it be used for 2399:22:05, 9 January 2019 (UTC) 2267:and submit your choices on 2195:and submit your choices on 1910:14:47, 17 August 2013 (UTC) 1891:12:07, 17 August 2013 (UTC) 1867:11:54, 17 August 2013 (UTC) 1322:. Grammatically incorrect? 1050:Hi, Jpcohen! I've posted a 792:20:55, 8 January 2012 (UTC) 775:19:22, 8 January 2012 (UTC) 673:T S Eliot and anti-Semitism 469:00:43, 1 October 2010 (UTC) 273:have not changed it again. 244:05:59, 29 August 2008 (UTC) 100: 96:03:12, 18 August 2007 (UTC) 2670: 2644:MediaWiki message delivery 2538:The Veil of Verifiability 2535:The Neutral Point of View 2532:Small Changes, Big Impact 2448:Knowledge (XXG) Help pages 2378:Here is what was removed: 2348:MediaWiki message delivery 2275:MediaWiki message delivery 2265:the candidates' statements 2201:MediaWiki message delivery 1064:16:21, 25 March 2012 (UTC) 348:McCartney "success" rating 267:15:55, 27 March 2009 (UTC) 218:03:54, 29 March 2008 (UTC) 201:03:23, 29 March 2008 (UTC) 180:23:57, 28 March 2008 (UTC) 1939:-status according to the 1842: 1824:22:09, 23 July 2013 (UTC) 1800:23:21, 22 July 2013 (UTC) 1723:16:18, 27 June 2013 (UTC) 1701: 1683:17:53, 25 June 2013 (UTC) 1611: 1328:See terms and conditions. 1285:00:54, 17 July 2012 (UTC) 1248:21:28, 15 July 2012 (UTC) 1134:23:53, 29 June 2012 (UTC) 1108:23:49, 29 June 2012 (UTC) 1089:13:06, 29 June 2012 (UTC) 726:23:55, 24 June 2011 (UTC) 711:23:29, 24 June 2011 (UTC) 703:Silvercitychristmasisland 607: 422:Thanks for your edits to 329:Lennon songwriting rating 283:13:38, 1 April 2009 (UTC) 115:A tag has been placed on 2641:to your user talk page. 2016:has been placed on hold 1984: 1905: 1643:Navboxes on author pages 1635:19:01, 8 June 2013 (UTC) 1590:13:23, 28 May 2013 (UTC) 1585: 1573:11:55, 28 May 2013 (UTC) 1548:20:39, 21 May 2013 (UTC) 1543: 1280: 1207:18:08, 5 July 2012 (UTC) 1168:17:59, 5 July 2012 (UTC) 1163: 1129: 1031: 990: 950:07:31, 31 May 2012 (UTC) 936:02:15, 30 May 2012 (UTC) 931: 922:02:06, 30 May 2012 (UTC) 917: 907:22:55, 29 May 2012 (UTC) 787: 721: 691:16:22, 6 June 2011 (UTC) 667:14:30, 29 May 2011 (UTC) 662: 652:05:23, 29 May 2011 (UTC) 591: 544:Knowledge (XXG):Red link 533:Thanks for your work on 498: 446: 343:04:32, 1 July 2009 (UTC) 31:19:23, 31 May 2012 (UTC) 2529:An Invitation to Earth 2526:Say Hello to the World 1762:my operator's talk page 1750:William Carlos Williams 1615:Poetry Project Barnstar 1531:20:28, 7 May 2013 (UTC) 1510:18:43, 4 May 2013 (UTC) 1275:Sendak's personal life. 761:William Carlos Williams 596:05:31, 5 May 2011 (UTC) 249:Delmore Schwartz trivia 117:Bob Dylan's 115th Dream 103:Bob Dylan's 115th Dream 57:and have been removed. 53:do not comply with our 2544:Looking Good Together 2412: 1461:'American women poets' 1453:'poets by Nationality' 1255:I've commented on the 738:deal at the crossroads 612: 112: 49:you added to the page 2602:Arbitration Committee 2585:Hello! Voting in the 2411: 2315:Arbitration Committee 2242:Arbitration Committee 2215:ArbCom Elections 2016 2173:Arbitration Committee 2089:Message delivered by 2032:Message delivered by 2024:good article criteria 1951:Message delivered by 1846:The Civility Barnstar 1705:The Literary Barnstar 1451:, then you see there 1311:this revision history 617:Thanks for uploading 610: 111: 1752:may have broken the 836:opt-out instructions 539:Knowledge (XXG):ISBN 2177:arbitration process 2073:you nominated as a 2012:you nominated as a 1598:A barnstar for you! 1455:. You can then see 1156:Six Gallery Reading 818:fix with Dab solver 162:one of these admins 101:Speedy deletion of 71:article's talk page 2618:arbitration policy 2541:The Civility Code 2413: 2331:arbitration policy 2258:arbitration policy 2217:: Voting now open! 2189:arbitration policy 2085:Talk:Robert Lowell 2028:Talk:Robert Lowell 1935:you nominated for 1877:Rayner Heppenstall 1623:WikiProject Poetry 1445:this page explains 853:Disambiguation bot 826:• Join us at the 613: 561:A cupcake for you! 381:First of all, the 113: 2654: 2548: 2547: 2138:A Song for Simeon 2097: 2040: 1959: 1872: 1871: 1728: 1727: 1681: 1640: 1639: 1390: 1373:comment added by 1240:Weedle McHairybug 831: 625:claim of fair use 584: 583: 529:ISBN and redlinks 93: 2661: 2642: 2640: 2581: 2567: 2561: 2520: 2513: 2506: 2499: 2492: 2485: 2478: 2472: 2410: 2371:was made to the 2299: 2226: 2144:. Many thanks.-- 2108: 2088: 2082: 2051: 2031: 2021: 1970: 1950: 1948: 1840: 1833: 1832: 1785: 1777: 1739: 1738: 1721: 1699: 1692: 1691: 1659: 1609: 1602: 1601: 1571: 1529: 1478: 1457:'American poets' 1389: 1367: 1320: 1317: 1301:: both are from 1205: 1106: 1087: 858:Patchen question 821: 814:check to confirm 773: 696:Vandalism report 615: 609: 586:Thank you, Span! 572: 565: 236:Piano non troppo 228:Delmore Schwartz 215: 198: 177: 170: 141: 140: 134: 92: 90: 84: 78: 44: 2669: 2668: 2664: 2663: 2662: 2660: 2659: 2658: 2657: 2656: 2634: 2582: 2574: 2569: 2565: 2559: 2556: 2518: 2511: 2504: 2497: 2490: 2483: 2476: 2408: 2406: 2365: 2360: 2359: 2300: 2292: 2287: 2286: 2270:the voting page 2227: 2219: 2197:the voting page 2163: 2134: 2102: 2093:, on behalf of 2067: 2045: 2036:, on behalf of 2006: 1964: 1955:, on behalf of 1929: 1831: 1807: 1781: 1773: 1736: 1733: 1712: 1690: 1649:Charles Dickens 1645: 1600: 1562: 1558: 1520: 1517: 1487: 1469: 1440: 1397: 1368: 1339: 1318: 1315: 1295: 1225: 1196: 1097: 1078: 1071: 1048: 1046:Bob Dylan: lead 966: 860: 855: 828:DPL WikiProject 802: 764: 757: 734: 698: 675: 604: 603: 580: 563: 531: 420: 372: 350: 331: 291: 251: 231: 213: 196: 187:deletion review 173: 166: 138: 132: 131: 106: 88: 82: 79: 51:Kenneth Patchen 38: 19: 12: 11: 5: 2667: 2665: 2625:the candidates 2594:eligible users 2583: 2576: 2575: 2573: 2570: 2557: 2555: 2549: 2546: 2545: 2542: 2539: 2536: 2533: 2530: 2527: 2523: 2522: 2515: 2508: 2501: 2494: 2487: 2480: 2463: 2462: 2461: 2460: 2459: 2458: 2457: 2456: 2455: 2454: 2453: 2452: 2451: 2450: 2445: 2440: 2435: 2405: 2402: 2364: 2361: 2338:the candidates 2301: 2294: 2293: 2291: 2288: 2228: 2221: 2220: 2218: 2212: 2166: 2162: 2157: 2133: 2130: 2128: 2066: 2062:nomination of 2056: 2005: 2001:nomination of 1995: 1994: 1993: 1992: 1991: 1928: 1924:nomination of 1918: 1917: 1916: 1915: 1914: 1913: 1912: 1898: 1883:Martinevans123 1870: 1869: 1849: 1848: 1843: 1841: 1830: 1827: 1806: 1803: 1788: 1787: 1778: 1770: 1769: 1732: 1729: 1726: 1725: 1708: 1707: 1702: 1700: 1689: 1688:And another... 1686: 1644: 1641: 1638: 1637: 1618: 1617: 1612: 1610: 1599: 1596: 1595: 1594: 1593: 1592: 1557: 1554: 1553: 1552: 1551: 1550: 1516: 1513: 1498: 1497: 1494: 1486: 1483: 1439: 1436: 1435: 1434: 1433: 1432: 1396: 1393: 1392: 1391: 1338: 1335: 1294: 1293:RE: Sockpuppet 1291: 1290: 1289: 1288: 1287: 1269: 1268: 1267: 1266: 1262:Martinevans123 1257:Maurice Sendak 1224: 1223:Sendak Joking. 1221: 1220: 1219: 1218: 1217: 1216: 1215: 1214: 1213: 1212: 1211: 1210: 1209: 1177: 1176: 1175: 1174: 1173: 1172: 1171: 1170: 1152:Allen Ginsberg 1141: 1140: 1139: 1138: 1137: 1136: 1113: 1112: 1111: 1110: 1070: 1069:Allen Ginsberg 1067: 1047: 1044: 1043: 1042: 1041: 1040: 1039: 1038: 1000: 999: 998: 997: 965: 962: 961: 960: 959: 958: 957: 956: 955: 954: 953: 952: 942:Martinevans123 899:Martinevans123 885:Martinevans123 870:Martinevans123 859: 856: 854: 851: 801: 798: 797: 796: 795: 794: 756: 753: 733: 730: 729: 728: 697: 694: 674: 671: 670: 669: 602: 599: 582: 581: 575: 573: 562: 559: 530: 527: 526: 525: 524: 523: 506: 505: 474: 473: 472: 471: 454: 453: 419: 416: 388:reconciliation 383:reconciliation 371: 365: 349: 346: 330: 327: 326: 325: 324: 323: 290: 287: 286: 285: 250: 247: 230: 224: 223: 222: 221: 220: 204: 203: 105: 99: 47:external links 37: 34: 18: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2666: 2655: 2653: 2649: 2645: 2638: 2632: 2631: 2626: 2621: 2619: 2615: 2611: 2607: 2603: 2598: 2596: 2595: 2590: 2589: 2580: 2571: 2568: 2562: 2554: 2553: 2543: 2540: 2537: 2534: 2531: 2528: 2525: 2524: 2521: 2516: 2514: 2509: 2507: 2502: 2500: 2495: 2493: 2488: 2486: 2481: 2479: 2474: 2473: 2470: 2468: 2449: 2446: 2444: 2441: 2439: 2436: 2434: 2431: 2430: 2429: 2428: 2426: 2423: 2422: 2421: 2420: 2419: 2418: 2417: 2416: 2415: 2414: 2403: 2401: 2400: 2396: 2392: 2388: 2387: 2382: 2381: 2376: 2374: 2370: 2369:Jacob Epstein 2362: 2358: 2357: 2353: 2349: 2345: 2344: 2339: 2334: 2332: 2328: 2324: 2320: 2316: 2311: 2308: 2307: 2298: 2289: 2285: 2284: 2280: 2276: 2272: 2271: 2266: 2261: 2259: 2255: 2251: 2247: 2243: 2238: 2235: 2234: 2225: 2216: 2213: 2211: 2210: 2206: 2202: 2198: 2194: 2190: 2186: 2182: 2178: 2174: 2170: 2161: 2158: 2156: 2155: 2151: 2147: 2143: 2139: 2129: 2126: 2125: 2121: 2117: 2112: 2111: 2106: 2101: 2096: 2092: 2086: 2081: 2076: 2072: 2071:Robert Lowell 2065: 2064:Robert Lowell 2061: 2057: 2055: 2054: 2049: 2044: 2039: 2035: 2029: 2025: 2020: 2015: 2011: 2010:Robert Lowell 2004: 2003:Robert Lowell 2000: 1996: 1990: 1986: 1982: 1978: 1977: 1976: 1975: 1974: 1973: 1968: 1963: 1958: 1954: 1947: 1942: 1938: 1934: 1933:Robert Lowell 1927: 1926:Robert Lowell 1923: 1919: 1911: 1907: 1903: 1899: 1896: 1895: 1894: 1893: 1892: 1888: 1884: 1881: 1878: 1874: 1873: 1868: 1864: 1860: 1856: 1851: 1850: 1847: 1844: 1839: 1834: 1828: 1826: 1825: 1821: 1817: 1816:Milkunderwood 1812: 1804: 1802: 1801: 1797: 1793: 1784: 1779: 1776: 1772: 1771: 1767: 1766: 1765: 1763: 1759: 1758:edit the page 1755: 1751: 1747: 1743: 1730: 1724: 1719: 1715: 1710: 1709: 1706: 1703: 1698: 1693: 1687: 1685: 1684: 1679: 1675: 1671: 1667: 1663: 1658: 1654: 1650: 1642: 1636: 1632: 1628: 1624: 1620: 1619: 1616: 1613: 1608: 1603: 1597: 1591: 1587: 1583: 1579: 1578: 1577: 1576: 1575: 1574: 1569: 1565: 1555: 1549: 1545: 1541: 1537: 1536: 1535: 1534: 1533: 1532: 1527: 1523: 1514: 1512: 1511: 1507: 1503: 1495: 1492: 1491: 1490: 1484: 1482: 1481: 1476: 1472: 1466: 1462: 1458: 1454: 1450: 1446: 1437: 1431: 1428: 1425: 1421: 1420: 1419: 1418: 1417: 1416: 1413: 1410: 1406: 1402: 1394: 1388: 1384: 1380: 1376: 1372: 1365: 1364: 1363: 1362: 1358: 1354: 1349: 1346: 1342: 1336: 1334: 1333: 1330: 1329: 1325: 1321: 1312: 1308: 1304: 1300: 1292: 1286: 1282: 1278: 1273: 1272: 1271: 1270: 1263: 1258: 1254: 1253: 1252: 1251: 1250: 1249: 1245: 1241: 1235: 1234: 1228: 1222: 1208: 1203: 1199: 1193: 1189: 1188: 1187: 1186: 1185: 1184: 1183: 1182: 1181: 1180: 1179: 1178: 1169: 1165: 1161: 1157: 1153: 1149: 1148: 1147: 1146: 1145: 1144: 1143: 1142: 1135: 1131: 1127: 1123: 1119: 1118: 1117: 1116: 1115: 1114: 1109: 1104: 1100: 1095: 1094: 1093: 1092: 1091: 1090: 1085: 1081: 1075: 1068: 1066: 1065: 1061: 1057: 1053: 1045: 1037: 1033: 1029: 1025: 1024:Robert Lowell 1021: 1020: 1019: 1018: 1017: 1016: 1015: 1014: 1010: 1006: 996: 992: 988: 984: 983: 982: 981: 980: 979: 975: 971: 963: 951: 947: 943: 939: 938: 937: 933: 929: 925: 924: 923: 919: 915: 910: 909: 908: 904: 900: 896: 895: 894: 890: 886: 882: 881: 880: 879: 875: 871: 866: 857: 852: 850: 849: 845: 841: 837: 832: 829: 825: 819: 815: 811: 807: 799: 793: 789: 785: 781: 780: 779: 778: 777: 776: 771: 767: 762: 754: 752: 751: 747: 743: 739: 731: 727: 723: 719: 715: 714: 713: 712: 708: 704: 695: 693: 692: 688: 684: 680: 672: 668: 664: 660: 656: 655: 654: 653: 649: 645: 642:. Thank you. 641: 637: 632: 630: 626: 622: 621: 614: 600: 598: 597: 593: 589: 578: 574: 571: 567: 566: 560: 558: 557: 553: 549: 545: 540: 536: 535:James Merrill 528: 522: 518: 514: 510: 509: 508: 507: 504: 500: 496: 491: 490: 489: 488: 484: 480: 470: 466: 462: 458: 457: 456: 455: 452: 448: 444: 441:My pleasure. 440: 439: 438: 437: 433: 429: 425: 424:Robert Lowell 418:Robert Lowell 417: 415: 414: 410: 406: 401: 398: 393: 390:with the the 389: 384: 380: 377: 370: 366: 364: 363: 359: 355: 347: 345: 344: 340: 336: 335:John Cardinal 328: 322: 318: 314: 310: 309: 308: 307: 306: 305: 301: 297: 288: 284: 280: 276: 271: 270: 269: 268: 264: 260: 256: 248: 246: 245: 241: 237: 229: 225: 219: 216: 210: 208: 207: 206: 205: 202: 199: 193: 188: 184: 183: 182: 181: 178: 176: 171: 169: 163: 158: 154: 153: 152:the talk page 148: 147: 137: 128: 126: 122: 118: 110: 104: 98: 97: 91: 86: 85: 76: 72: 68: 64: 60: 56: 52: 48: 43: 35: 33: 32: 28: 24: 23:MJKingofMusic 16: 2628: 2622: 2599: 2592: 2586: 2584: 2551: 2464: 2424: 2389: 2383: 2377: 2366: 2341: 2335: 2312: 2304: 2302: 2268: 2262: 2239: 2231: 2229: 2164: 2146:ColonelHenry 2135: 2127: 2113: 2075:good article 2069:The article 2068: 2014:good article 2008:The article 2007: 1930: 1857:. Hats off! 1855:Dylan Thomas 1845: 1808: 1789: 1782: 1774: 1734: 1704: 1657:TonyTheTiger 1646: 1614: 1559: 1518: 1502:ColonelHenry 1499: 1488: 1464: 1459:and finally 1441: 1398: 1369:— Preceding 1350: 1347: 1343: 1340: 1327: 1323: 1296: 1236: 1229: 1226: 1072: 1049: 1001: 967: 864: 861: 833: 803: 758: 735: 699: 676: 635: 633: 618: 616: 605: 585: 532: 475: 421: 396: 391: 387: 382: 375: 373: 351: 332: 292: 254: 252: 232: 192:Esanchez7587 174: 167: 156: 150: 143: 129: 114: 81: 75:welcome page 39: 20: 2630:voting page 2425:Hi Jpcohen! 2343:voting page 2077:has failed 1859:FruitMonkey 1740:Hello, I'm 1424:Paul August 1409:Paul August 1324:Correct it! 1120:Thank you, 964:Weldon Kees 806:Uptown Girl 644:Skier Dude2 275:Languagehat 259:Languagehat 168:Nk.sheridan 144:the top of 63:advertising 36:August 2007 2614:topic bans 2391:WikiParker 2373:T.S. Eliot 2327:topic bans 2254:topic bans 2185:topic bans 1811:Allen Tate 1792:BracketBot 1742:BracketBot 1674:WP:CHICAGO 1485:T.S. Eliot 1005:Logatorial 970:Logatorial 838:. Thanks, 2610:site bans 2519:Mission 7 2512:Mission 6 2505:Mission 5 2498:Mission 4 2491:Mission 3 2484:Mission 2 2477:Mission 1 2323:site bans 2250:site bans 2181:site bans 2116:Tim riley 2100:Tim riley 2095:Tim riley 2043:Tim riley 2038:Tim riley 1979:Thanks!! 1962:Tim riley 1957:Tim riley 1829:Thanks... 1805:Agrarians 1746:your edit 1731:July 2013 1405:like this 1401:this edit 1307:Australia 1003:course.-- 822:Read the 742:Mick gold 683:Mick gold 405:Viriditas 397:Big Fish, 255:different 2552:Get Help 1941:criteria 1790:Thanks, 1780:* '']'' 1580:Thanks! 1383:contribs 1371:unsigned 1351:Thanks. 1074:Ginsberg 1052:response 755:Williams 636:articles 428:Spanglej 376:Big Fish 369:Big Fish 146:the page 67:nofollow 2637:NoACEMM 2091:Legobot 2034:Legobot 1981:Jpcohen 1953:Legobot 1902:Jpcohen 1678:WP:FOUR 1627:Khazar2 1582:Jpcohen 1540:Jpcohen 1449:'Poets' 1299:WP:DUCK 1277:Jpcohen 1160:Jpcohen 1126:Jpcohen 1056:Allreet 1028:Jpcohen 987:Jpcohen 928:Jpcohen 914:Jpcohen 865:meaning 840:DPL bot 784:Jpcohen 718:Jpcohen 659:Jpcohen 588:Jpcohen 495:Jpcohen 443:Jpcohen 313:Buster7 296:Buster7 125:sandbox 83:PNiddy 2171:. The 2083:; see 1754:syntax 1556:Lowell 1309:, and 289:Oct 12 214:Keegan 197:Keegan 157:speedy 136:hangon 2058:Your 1997:Your 1920:Your 1515:Frost 1375:A7592 1353:A7592 1319:hotch 1303:Perth 493:Best. 392:story 354:PL290 2648:talk 2600:The 2395:talk 2352:talk 2313:The 2279:talk 2240:The 2205:talk 2150:talk 2120:talk 2105:talk 2048:talk 1985:talk 1967:talk 1906:talk 1887:talk 1863:talk 1820:talk 1796:talk 1718:talk 1714:Span 1631:talk 1586:talk 1568:talk 1564:Span 1544:talk 1526:talk 1522:Span 1506:talk 1475:talk 1471:Span 1438:Cats 1379:talk 1357:talk 1281:talk 1244:talk 1202:talk 1198:Span 1192:here 1164:talk 1130:talk 1122:Span 1103:talk 1099:Span 1084:talk 1080:Span 1060:talk 1032:talk 1009:talk 991:talk 974:talk 946:talk 932:talk 918:talk 903:talk 889:talk 874:talk 844:talk 810:Glee 788:talk 770:talk 766:Span 746:talk 722:talk 707:talk 687:talk 679:here 663:talk 648:talk 592:talk 577:Span 552:talk 548:Span 517:talk 513:Span 499:talk 483:talk 479:Span 465:talk 461:Span 447:talk 432:talk 409:talk 367:Re: 358:talk 339:talk 317:talk 300:talk 279:talk 263:talk 240:talk 175:Talk 89:Go! 27:talk 17:Help 2467:UTC 2165:Hi, 2098:-- 2041:-- 1960:-- 1748:to 1670:BIO 1407:. 824:FAQ 631:). 142:to 2650:) 2639:}} 2635:{{ 2612:, 2563:| 2469:) 2397:) 2354:) 2346:. 2325:, 2281:) 2273:. 2252:, 2207:) 2183:, 2152:) 2122:) 2060:GA 1999:GA 1987:) 1943:. 1937:GA 1922:GA 1908:) 1889:) 1865:) 1822:) 1798:) 1775:}} 1764:. 1680:) 1633:) 1588:) 1546:) 1508:) 1465:is 1385:) 1381:• 1359:) 1316:Tb 1305:, 1283:) 1246:) 1166:) 1132:) 1062:) 1034:) 1011:) 993:) 976:) 948:) 934:) 920:) 905:) 891:) 876:) 846:) 816:| 790:) 748:) 724:) 709:) 689:) 681:. 665:) 650:) 594:) 554:) 537:. 519:) 501:) 485:) 467:) 449:) 434:) 411:) 360:) 341:) 319:) 302:) 281:) 265:) 242:) 139:}} 133:{{ 94:0 29:) 2646:( 2393:( 2350:( 2277:( 2203:( 2148:( 2118:( 2107:) 2103:( 2050:) 2046:( 1983:( 1969:) 1965:( 1904:( 1885:( 1861:( 1818:( 1794:( 1783:( 1720:) 1716:( 1676:/ 1672:/ 1668:/ 1666:C 1664:/ 1662:T 1660:( 1629:( 1584:( 1570:) 1566:( 1542:( 1528:) 1524:( 1504:( 1477:) 1473:( 1427:☎ 1412:☎ 1377:( 1355:( 1279:( 1242:( 1204:) 1200:( 1162:( 1128:( 1105:) 1101:( 1086:) 1082:( 1058:( 1030:( 1007:( 989:( 972:( 944:( 930:( 916:( 901:( 887:( 872:( 842:( 830:. 812:( 786:( 772:) 768:( 744:( 720:( 705:( 685:( 661:( 646:( 611:⚠ 590:( 550:( 515:( 497:( 481:( 463:( 445:( 430:( 407:( 356:( 337:( 315:( 298:( 277:( 261:( 238:( 25:(

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index