Knowledge

User talk:Jreferee/Archive 5

Source 📝

351:, and at least the most recent DRV, and decide whether to mention the AFD on the noticeboard or it's talk page or not. If the AFD results in a keep closure, then I would like some of the BLP regulars to put the new article on their BLP watchlists, given the history and the BLP driven ArbComm remedy that the article is subject to. 277:
You are working with the assumption that having man/man sex or dressing in a certain way is a bad thing. If the article was about straight men who dressed a certain way would THAT be a problem? The subjects of the photos can't be identified from these pics anyway. There is no problem here. Please,
45:
It might be too soon for a GA review since it looks like a peer review is pending. In my view, each sentence should have a footnote (expect those in the lead section). Otherwise, how is a reviewing editor supposed to know where the information came from to be able to verify that information? The
491:
AfD Debate. I can see your comments are well-thought out and even required a little research. I appreciate that sort of effort very much even if it leads you to a different conclusion than my own. Would you please tell me what resource you used to determine the amount of web traffic? That seems
145:
The guy whose cat had more notoriety than he did? I am impressed by your hard efforts and those others who contributed to bring McNish up to a featured article. To me, this is Knowledge at its best - presenting quality information to the world on an encyclopedic topic that otherwise would remain
515:
Thank you very much for adding the company info box. I made a correction in the intro as "A4A Network Inc." is current business name not frmer operations name and is already discussed in the text. I am glad the substance of the article has improved enough to sway your opinion in the AFD debate.
542:
No need to apologize, but I appreciate it. At the top of the email, the email client wrote "Below is a summary of your request and our response." In their response at the bottom of the email, the requested Permissions were granted. (Category Level 1: Rights and Permissions; Category Level 2:
531:
First of all, I want to apologise for the delay you experienced. We're quite backlogged. I'm not sure that's the reason nothing happened, however. I've looked over the email you forwarded to us quite carefully, and I am unable to find the actual release statement in it. Did your email client
552:
I saw that, but that's not really a binding licensing statement... it looks more like their email-sorting queue to me. You never got a further response from them? I'm afraid that we really need something more authoritative than that, since we wouldn't know who to attribute the copyright to, a
606:
I started that 25 months ago, eh? *sniff* It's so hard to see the little ones grow up and go out on their own ... (although if you check the history from last year, you'll find that I tried and failed to slash out large parts of the article! Perhaps it's just as well I didn't succeed) -
211:{{WPBiography |living = yes no |class = |needs-infobox = yes |activepol = yes |a&e-work-group = yes |politician-work-group = yes |military-work-group = yes |sports-work-group = yes |s&a-work-group = yes |musician-work-group = yes |listas = |needs-photo = yes }} 46:
copyright material in the article footnotes needs to be delted. The footnotes in the article need to be revised to be proper footnotes. I revised footnote 5 to give you an example of what I mean. Also, if you haven't done so, you may want to go through each of
472:
article. As I'm busy this week with funeral stuff and other obligations, can you keep an eye on it to make sure Alansohn and Richard Arthur Norton don't start fucking it up again. If they do, please ask for it to be protected until the issue is resolved.
348: 213:
This string of text contains the most used WPBiography text and is useful for most articles. This may help you in configuring the bot. It would be nice to work with you on modifying the bot so I can get an idea of how bots are put together. --
239:
that he is the author of the photo and the model gave permission. Note the face is largely obscured. Admins involved with DYK are aware this photo is being used and none have objected. Please assume good faith. Thanks!
254:
are potentially libelous to the persons in the images since the images appear to be of living people and the persons in the image are associated with being thuggish men who have sex with men. Since article does not include
715:
as well, because that's used to refresh, so your changes would be lost (if not done there) at the next time ../clear was used to refresh. I wonder if that tip needs to be saved somewhere :) ++
741:. I'm not exactly sure how/when the DYK next update clear page is used to refresh the DYK next update page. Would you mind providing more detail about the DYK next update clear page on the 431: 683:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any 321:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any 92:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any 679:
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "
317:
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "
88:
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "
50:
looking for material to add to the article. This should give you a start. Once you addressed all the peer review statements, then the article may be ready for GA review. --
636: 344: 131:
In case you are interested, this article, which you found some useful sources for back when it was a wee stub, just became a featured article. Thanks for your help. Cheers,
532:
perhaps trim it out of the email due to the length? Am I missing it somewhere in the midst of the text? Would it be helpful for me to send you back what you sent us?
370: 209:
In my WPBiography tagging, I review the article for living, groups, etc, and then paste and then edit the following text according to my review of the article:
668:, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. 306:, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. 77:, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. 672:
if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see
450:"Biography of Living Persons Administrators ("BLP Admins") carry out a specialized, narrowly tailored administrative role within Knowledge." Please see 310:
if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see
81:
if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see
397:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the 680: 318: 89: 712: 256: 688: 326: 97: 47: 36: 701: 625:
article, please read the talk page and refrain from making changes. I am currently mediating a conflict in this article. Thank you!
171:
project tagging articles listed at DYK. Is it possible to modify STTWBot to assist me in tagging biography article talk pages with
191:
My bot currently has approval for tagging WikiProject France and WikiProject Germany only. Any change has to be approved at
195:
first. So when if you can wait then I could request for an approval and help you out, should take perhaps a week or so.
660:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 635:
I removed most of the references to living person Afshar in the article to resolve a request about the article on the
413: 298:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 69:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 398: 724: 199: 111: 146:
known by a few. Congratulations and I do appreciate your notifying me of the article's featured status. --
742: 738: 600: 369: 294: 192: 656: 517: 507: 493: 236: 385: 175: 165: 279: 241: 196: 137: 673: 451: 444: 311: 228: 82: 17: 622: 608: 474: 114:, uploaded two days earlier on November 27, 2006. Please delete Image:SSSN DVD Cover.jpg.-- 32: 492:
like a resource it would be helpful to have at my disposal now and in the future. Thanks.
590:
Thank you Jreferee for your help and effort in this matter - it is very much appreciated.
259:
to support such an association, I do not believe that the images meet the requirements of
669: 639:
page. Please feel free to revert any of my changes should that aid your mediation. --
571:
Sorry to hear that it didn't work out. Let me know if there's anything else I can do.
455: 307: 132: 78: 746: 720: 640: 563: 544: 435: 268: 264: 260: 215: 182: 147: 115: 51: 749: 727: 695: 661: 643: 629: 626: 611: 594: 591: 575: 566: 557: 547: 536: 520: 510: 496: 477: 469: 458: 438: 419: 355: 352: 349:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Simon Fraser University 1997 harassment controversy
333: 299: 282: 271: 244: 218: 204: 185: 150: 139: 125: 118: 104: 70: 54: 39: 665: 572: 554: 533: 303: 74: 692: 408: 376: 330: 101: 734: 488: 716: 711:... when changeing wording there, don't forget to change the wording at 708: 503: 392: 251: 430:
This page has had a troubled history. You may wish to read this:
380: 432:
Knowledge:Requests for arbitration/Rachel Marsden/Evidence
707:
I saw you made some good improvements to the wording on
267:
requires quick deletion under such circumstances. --
502:
I see now by its mention in the article that it was
345:
Knowledge:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard
687:will be deleted after seven days, as described on 325:will be deleted after seven days, as described on 96:will be deleted after seven days, as described on 61:Orphaned fair use image (Image:SSSN DVD Cover.jpg) 288:Orphaned fair use image (Image:DoSscreenshot.jpg) 110:Image:SSSN DVD Cover.jpg is a duplicate image of 691:. Thank you. This is an automated message from 329:. Thank you. This is an automated message from 100:. Thank you. This is an automated message from 650:Orphaned fair use image (Image:SSSNPoster.JPG) 31:Will you help me go through a GA review with 8: 487:Hi Jref. Thanks for your comments at the 364: 454:to offer your thoughts on this proposal. 389:was updated with a fact from the article 562:No problem, I'll contact them again. -- 713:Template:Did you know/Next update/Clear 445:Biography of living persons adminship 7: 468:They removed the protection on the 664:. However, the image is currently 621:Jreferee, if you plan to edit the 302:. However, the image is currently 73:. However, the image is currently 24: 702:Template:Did you know/Next update 368: 343:You seem to be quite active in 263:. I deleted the images because 37:Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) 1: 750:19:17, 22 February 2007 (UTC) 728:21:35, 21 February 2007 (UTC) 696:20:27, 15 February 2007 (UTC) 644:17:51, 14 February 2007 (UTC) 630:17:45, 14 February 2007 (UTC) 612:20:48, 12 February 2007 (UTC) 576:00:46, 14 February 2007 (UTC) 521:06:22, 10 February 2007 (UTC) 689:criteria for speedy deletion 595:20:41, 9 February 2007 (UTC) 567:20:44, 8 February 2007 (UTC) 558:18:58, 8 February 2007 (UTC) 548:18:46, 8 February 2007 (UTC) 537:18:38, 8 February 2007 (UTC) 511:17:19, 7 February 2007 (UTC) 497:16:51, 7 February 2007 (UTC) 478:10:43, 6 February 2007 (UTC) 459:03:44, 6 February 2007 (UTC) 439:03:06, 6 February 2007 (UTC) 420:23:30, 4 February 2007 (UTC) 356:20:33, 4 February 2007 (UTC) 334:08:28, 4 February 2007 (UTC) 327:criteria for speedy deletion 283:19:22, 1 February 2007 (UTC) 272:19:17, 1 February 2007 (UTC) 245:18:55, 1 February 2007 (UTC) 219:17:03, 1 February 2007 (UTC) 205:16:52, 1 February 2007 (UTC) 186:16:02, 1 February 2007 (UTC) 161:I came across STTWBot while 151:15:40, 31 January 2007 (UTC) 140:12:28, 31 January 2007 (UTC) 119:16:28, 28 January 2007 (UTC) 105:00:04, 28 January 2007 (UTC) 98:criteria for speedy deletion 55:16:04, 26 January 2007 (UTC) 40:01:09, 26 January 2007 (UTC) 157:WPBiography project tagging 766: 739:Knowledge:Did_you_know#DYK 553:requirement of the GFDL. 257:Knowledge reliable sources 112:Image:Sheshouldasaidno.jpg 733:Thanks Lar. I added the 399:"Did you know?" talk page 339:BLP/DRV/AFD/ArbComm Mess 67:Image:SSSN DVD Cover.jpg 295:Image:DoSscreenshot.jpg 743:Knowledge:Did you know 617:Please reasd talk page 601:Make Way for Ducklings 193:Knowledge:Bot requests 735:DYK next update clear 654:Thanks for uploading 292:Thanks for uploading 65:Thanks for uploading 657:Image:SSSNPoster.JPG 227:Banjee (copied from 745:page. Thanks. -- 674:our fair use policy 670:You may add it back 312:our fair use policy 308:You may add it back 83:our fair use policy 79:You may add it back 347:. Please look at 278:please let it go. 18:User talk:Jreferee 662:claim of fair use 623:Afshar experiment 527:Permissions email 506:. Thanks much. 422: 405: 404: 300:claim of fair use 71:claim of fair use 757: 681:my contributions 543:Permissions) -- 518:House of Scandal 508:House of Scandal 494:House of Scandal 417: 372: 365: 319:my contributions 237:House of Scandal 202: 180: 174: 170: 164: 135: 90:my contributions 33:Raoul Wallenberg 765: 764: 760: 759: 758: 756: 755: 754: 737:to the list at 705: 652: 619: 604: 588: 529: 485: 466: 448: 428: 423: 416: 363: 341: 290: 233: 200: 178: 172: 168: 162: 159: 133: 129: 63: 29: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 763: 761: 753: 752: 704: 699: 651: 648: 647: 646: 618: 615: 603: 598: 587: 584: 583: 582: 581: 580: 579: 578: 569: 528: 525: 524: 523: 516:Best wishes.-- 513: 484: 481: 465: 462: 447: 442: 427: 424: 412: 406: 403: 402: 373: 362: 359: 340: 337: 289: 286: 280:Shaundakulbara 275: 274: 250:The images in 242:Shaundakulbara 235:I was told by 232: 225: 224: 223: 222: 221: 158: 155: 154: 153: 128: 123: 122: 121: 62: 59: 58: 57: 28: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 762: 751: 748: 744: 740: 736: 732: 731: 730: 729: 726: 722: 718: 714: 710: 703: 700: 698: 697: 694: 690: 686: 682: 677: 675: 671: 667: 663: 659: 658: 649: 645: 642: 638: 634: 633: 632: 631: 628: 624: 616: 614: 613: 610: 602: 599: 597: 596: 593: 585: 577: 574: 570: 568: 565: 561: 560: 559: 556: 551: 550: 549: 546: 541: 540: 539: 538: 535: 526: 522: 519: 514: 512: 509: 505: 501: 500: 499: 498: 495: 490: 482: 480: 479: 476: 471: 463: 461: 460: 457: 453: 446: 443: 441: 440: 437: 433: 425: 421: 415: 410: 400: 396: 395: 394: 388: 387: 386:Did you know? 382: 378: 374: 371: 367: 366: 361:Did you know? 360: 358: 357: 354: 350: 346: 338: 336: 335: 332: 328: 324: 320: 315: 313: 309: 305: 301: 297: 296: 287: 285: 284: 281: 273: 270: 266: 262: 258: 253: 249: 248: 247: 246: 243: 238: 230: 226: 220: 217: 212: 208: 207: 206: 203: 198: 194: 190: 189: 188: 187: 184: 181:? Thanks. -- 177: 167: 156: 152: 149: 144: 143: 142: 141: 138: 136: 127: 124: 120: 117: 113: 109: 108: 107: 106: 103: 99: 95: 91: 86: 84: 80: 76: 72: 68: 60: 56: 53: 49: 44: 43: 42: 41: 38: 34: 26: 19: 706: 684: 678: 655: 653: 620: 609:DavidWBrooks 605: 589: 530: 486: 470:Joyce Kilmer 467: 464:Joyce Kilmer 449: 429: 391: 390: 384: 342: 322: 316: 293: 291: 276: 234: 210: 160: 130: 126:Harry McNish 93: 87: 66: 64: 30: 27:Help with GA 483:Web traffic 475:ExplorerCDT 452:WP:BLPADMIN 176:WPBiography 166:WPBiography 48:these links 377:4 February 586:Your note 489:Adam4Adam 456:CyberAnth 134:Yomangani 747:Jreferee 685:articles 666:orphaned 641:Jreferee 564:Jreferee 545:Jreferee 436:CJCurrie 323:articles 304:orphaned 269:Jreferee 216:Jreferee 183:Jreferee 148:Jreferee 116:Jreferee 94:articles 75:orphaned 52:Jreferee 709:T:DYK/N 627:Sdirrim 592:Crum375 504:Hitwise 426:Marsden 393:Disco D 353:GRBerry 573:Jkelly 555:Jkelly 534:Jkelly 265:WP:BLP 261:WP:BLP 252:Banjee 201:(talk) 693:BJBot 409:GeeJo 331:BJBot 102:BJBot 16:< 637:BLPN 381:2007 229:here 197:STTW 35:? -- 717:Lar 676:). 434:. 414:(c) 375:On 314:). 85:). 719:: 418:• 407:-- 401:. 383:, 379:, 179:}} 173:{{ 169:}} 163:{{ 725:c 723:/ 721:t 473:— 411:⁄ 231:)

Index

User talk:Jreferee
Raoul Wallenberg
Richard Arthur Norton (1958- )
01:09, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
these links
Jreferee
16:04, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
claim of fair use
orphaned
You may add it back
our fair use policy
my contributions
criteria for speedy deletion
BJBot
00:04, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
Image:Sheshouldasaidno.jpg
Jreferee
16:28, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
Harry McNish
Yomangani

12:28, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
Jreferee
15:40, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
WPBiography
WPBiography
Jreferee
16:02, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
Knowledge:Bot requests
STTW

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.