User talk:Jreferee/Archive 9

710:) As included in my deleted post, this person set up his own blog in November 2006 on Sina with pictures saying, "I welcome you to PhotoShop my pictures" to generate more publicity for himself, and, as reported in February 2007, now is taken advantage of his fame to play emperor Liu Shan in a new cinematographic adaptation of "the romance of the Three Kingdoms." This hardly is a private child needing protection. The information I posted to the RfC was to show that the conduct of the people involved to protect this fame seeking 20 year old was misguided. My purpose for posting that information was to support the RfC desired outcome of "allowance of a consensus to be reached regarding the article" since the failure to allow a consensus to be reached was based in part on misguided efforts to protect the privacy of 20 year old. The posted information was from news articles based on my own research, not from the debated article (which I have never seen) and included references to those new articles to support my claims of misguide behavior. If some of the information I posted to the RfC seemed to be as an 'end run' of sorts, then that information could have been redacted or rewritten. Deleting my entire post, including those portions that were my outside view of the dispute and not seen as an 'end run' of sorts, is a poor way to respond and borders on reckless or aggressive behavior. Please ask the person who deleted my RfC post to reconsider their actions. -- 32:

year or longer. Most investment in DD relates to real-time data (such as glass cockpit display systems in aircraft, digital dashboards in automobiles, multi screen stock trader workstations, in-process control systems in industrial applications, real time control of service levels, just in time inventory management, etc. ), or up to weekly or monthly data (such as staffing levels needed, production forecasting, sales by product/region/category, inventory management, safety records, accounts receivable collections, delinquencies, production yields, etc). Also, the DoS article seems to border on original research and self-promotion. Its odd there is even a link to DoS since it is not an especially good example of a DD, consistent with the rest of the article. None of the content in the DoS article covers design or construction principals and there is no link directing readers to See Also the DD source content indicating the cross connection.

1256:, from whom I have swiped many, many things. Chocolate chip cookies sold separately. Batteries not included. Offer not valid with other coupons or promotions. May contain peanuts, strawberries, or eggs. Keep out of the reach of small children, may present a choking hazard to children under the age of 3 and an electrical hazard to small farm animals. Do not take with alcohol or grapefruit juice. This notice has a blue background and may disappear into thin air. The recipient of this message, hereafter referred to as "Barnum's latest sucker", relinquishes all rights and abilities to file a lawsuit, to jump on a pogostick while standing on his head, and to leap out in front of moving trains. KrakatoaKatie, Jimbo Wales, and the states of Arkansas, Wisconsin, and Oklahoma are not liable for any lost or stolen items or damage from errant shopping carts or unlicensed drivers such as Paris Hilton. 1823:

subsection Chemistry in the Energy article, before I decided to break it up into independent articles, in response to the notice that the article was becoming too big for the comfort of the average reader. Energy (chemistry) was a result. Several editors contributed to its content before it was made an independent article. Lately, SBHarris and co (I suspect they are in fact one person only) have become vengeful and want to delete most of my contributions to wikipedia. Which is rather unfortunate, because I like to belong to the community and contribute whereever I can. The reason of my this post, is because User_Itub has now taken it as his task to do wehat physchim62 could not, he has redirected the

749:

Knowledge was based on personal privacy concerns rather than consensus. Given the wide spread distribution of his name throughout the world over a four-year period and that your post suggested that deletion of his name on Knowledge was based on personal privacy concerns rather than consensus, my understanding at that time was that it was OK to post his name, even though you personally may have disagreed. At the time of my post, I did not know about the consensus and did not have bad intent in posting this person's name at RfC. The more I think about it, it was the use of the word "audacity" that chiefly lead me to my misunderstanding of the circumstances.

1950:

ON WIKIPEDIA. I SAID TO MYSELF . . . WHAT THE HECK IS A WIKIPEDIA??? AND I WENT TO WIKIPEDIA AND IT WAS SO COOL. AND I STILL DID NOT REALLY UNDERSTAND WIKIPEDIA . . . AS I THOUGHT EVERYONE COULD BE ON WIKIPEDIA LIKE WHAT IT WAS I SAW CREATED ABOUT ME. COOL . . . A PLACE TO MEET PEOPLE. NOT! MUCH MORE THAN THAT. IT IS LIKE THE PLACE TO FIND TRUTH. THEN I WAS . . . HONORED. OF COURSE IT DID NOT WORK OUT SO WELL IN THE BEGINNING AS I WAS TOLD BY SOMEONE TO GET IN THERE AND ADD "STUFF" ABOUT WHO I AM. SO I DID. AND IT ALL CAME TO AN END. UNTIL YOU STEPPED IN. AND THAT IS WHAT IT ALL ABOUT. HELPING PEOPLE.

671:

that the information from worldwide news articles is somehow private. Your assertion that I somehow used an excuse "but it's in my userspace" is not true. In addition, my post in this user space was a valid reply to rebut Tony Sidaway's assertion. In addition to deleting what you believe to be problematic, you also deleted portions of my post that did not fall into your problematic criteria. Through your 17:16, 22 May 2007 post, you then mislabeled the portions of my post that did not fall into your problematic criteria as "reposted problematic deleted content". Please reconsider your deletion of my post. --

758:

unintentionally (recklessly) took with it my RfC outside view of the dispute that the conduct of the people involved was in part based on misguided attempts to protect the privacy of this person. Not only is the purported BLP material gone from my RfC post, but my non-BLP arguments have been deleted with it. Policy does not support deleting those portions of my outsider view of the dispute that were not BLP. Rather, policy supports being respectful to other editors, their contributions, and their points of view such as by improving the edit rather than deleting it in its entirety. --

1216: 56: 346: 1310: 616:

started the buzz, and soon Entertainment Weekly and Variety and Chud caught on, and probably others that I'm unaware of. Nothing else mentioned the Knowledge article specifically, but it is a very safe guess that my article was what got them interested, albeit through degrees of separation. As an example, here is an NPR story that debuted only about a month after the Knowledge article was created.

1263: 1562: 291:

remain also: it doesn't present copyvio or defamation problems, and it is unlikely to contribute meaningfully to internet search results (ie, if James Boyce's admirers point to a DRV log as his "homepage", most everybody will be unable to find the text, or understand the context!) I'm undecided on your suggestion, but I just thought I'd share with you some thoughts.

437: 158: 356:, which passed with 86 support, 8 oppose, and 5 neutral !votes. I will keep in mind all your suggestions and/or concerns, and will try to live up to your standards. Please, if you have any comments or complaints about my actions as an administrator, leave a note on my talk page, and I will respond as soon as I possibly can, without 401: 1953:

NOW ABOUT ME AND MY CAPITALS . . . OH . . . YES . . . I'M KNOWN FOR USING ALL CAPITAL LETTERS WHEN WRITING A LETTER. I'VE BEEN TOLD BY SOME, THAT I MIGHT "DRIVE PEOPLE NUTS". IF OTHERS CHOOSE TO BECOME CRAZY, OR LOSE IT, OR EVEN BECOME "UPSET" ABOUT HOW I TYPE ? ? ? REMEMBER, ALL THAT ENERGY IS ABOUT

648:

to remove the name or conceal it behind pipes. This is because of privacy concerns. Please respect this, but do get back to me, or else make reasonable edits, if you think I've altered the RFC unreasonably. Out of deference to the sensitivity of the case, and of the audacity of these edits, I will

286:

You're doing a fantastic job providing little tidbits of information to help keep DRV discussions flowing smoothly. I really appreciate it; I'm sure every commenter does. :) Nobody before you had the idea of providing background and precedural points consistently, and I think you're doing very well

1949:

FIRST JREFEREE . . . YOU ARE THE BEST!!! YOU ARE COMPASSIONATE, UNDERSTANDING AND LOVING. THANK YOU FOR ALL OF YOUR HELP. I DID NOT KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT WIKIPEDIA AS I DO NOT READ. THEN ONE DAY IN ALL MY LETTERS, I RECEIVED THIS GRAND E MAIL TELLING ME THAT . . . "SCARY GUY" YOU HAVE BEEN ENTERED

605:

In mid-2006, I went to their page which showed the highest-grossing films of the year at that point. Just out of curiousity, I wanted to see what the lowest-grossing film was. I figured it would be in the hundreds of thousands of dollars, maybe even tens of thousands if it was an obscure independent

573:

Thanks for tagging the images. I did cut a corner by deleting the images first instead of asking you about them, thankfully the situation was resolved ok and I'll be more carefull next time. Incidentally, your tone during our converstaion was very pleasant (compared to what I'm used to), I think you

1111:

I would be glad to merge my list with yours, and make mine a redirect to be frank. Even though yours is only at the early stages, it is in the Knowledge space, and I think that makes it somewhat more official. Mine has also grown a bit of a stagnant mess, with only few people keeping it up to date.

835:

This situation is extremely upsetting. At a minimum, I think that you are entitled to run a new RfA without regard to the result of the previous one. That would be true anyway, since a couple of months have gone by, but the new information makes it all the more clear the matter should be considered

615:

Now what's interesting is that this played an instrumental part in the online buzz about the film. A few days later, Digg posted an article on their home page about the film, which gave credit to the Knowledge article. As Digg is one of the most visited websites on the Internet, this is what really

35:

These two articles are truly independent and should be kept that way. DD covers a fairly broad area including the underlying principals and theories used in the design and construction of digital dashboards. The article DoS is really in the area of geopolitical mapping. It covers a very narrow area

541:

While I appreciate your efforts, English Knowledge allows both free content images and non-free content images. If an inappropriate image copyright tag is used, it is proper to tag the image page for deletion and then leave a note on the contributor's talk page to give the contributor a chance to

31:

DoS is not a prime example of a DD. The graphics are more akin to traditional static charting and mapping vs. creating a real time GUI to assist in short-term decision-making and control of an ongoing processes. In DoS content is geopolitical/economic and data measurement frequency is typically a

670:

Your claim that I reposted deleted content is not true. The content I posted was written by myself, from my own research, and did not contain content that was deleted. Your claim that I posted problematic content is not true. All the information I posted was sourced and used to rebut the claim

780:

Hi Tony. You posted above "Out of deference to the sensitivity of the case, and of the audacity of these edits, I will make no comments on the RFC." and yet you are one of the most prolific posters at the RFC (and elsewhere) on this topic. You may want to take a step back from handling both an

290:

On James Boyce's article being reposted, in its entirety, at DRV: You are absolutely correct that such repostings could become a problem if they became routine. They aren't yet. In the few previous cases where someone has done this, we've let the content stand. My first instinct is to let this

1879:. From reading the article, it should have main sections such as: I. Typical personal information (born, grew up in, school, family, etc.), II. American Idol, III. Singing career, IV. Activist career. V. Philosophy. Right now, the structure/flow of the article is not as clear as it could be.-- 748:

lead me to believe that deletion of this person's name from Knowledge was you own personal privacy concerns. You even implied that your edits were beyond what should be done under the circumstances ("audacity of these edits"), which further lead me to believe that use of this person's name on

1822:

I feel I need your help. It appears SBharris, KSRoberts , Physchim62 and now Itub have joined hands to discourage from any edits on wikipedia. I have been particularly interested in the energy article and quite a substantial part of the article is due to me. I was the major contributor of the

757:

In regards to my reckless or aggressive behavior comment, I do not object to the deletion of this person's name, particularly now that I know it is based on consensus. However, I do object to the sweeping deletion of my entire RfC post because it either intentionally (aggressively) or

705:

As I stated in my RfC post that now is deleted in its entirety, it was my outside view of the dispute that the conduct of the people involved was in part based on attempts to protect the privacy of 20 year old whose name has been conveyed to millions of people throughout the world

542:

fix the problem. Immediately deleting an image on Knowledge because Commons does not permit non-free content is not supported by Knowledge process and is aggressive towards the contributor. Please consider restoring the images so that proper Knowledge process may be followed. --

755:. Had you posted this in your 01:53, 22 May 2007 post or made this clear in your 01:53, 22 May 2007 post, I would not have reposted this persons name. Certainly, now that I know the non-use of his name is based on consensus, I do apologize for reposting this person's name at RfC. 599:. (Not completely related, but they have a fantastic game called Box Office Derby, where you have to predict the grosses of the top ten films in the upcoming weekend's box office. It's a fun game that I would recommend, and here is my prediction history, if you're interested. 1128:

Just found a slight problem. If you look at my list, you will see that many editor's total amount of DYK creations + nominations are present. There are only a few who have exact numbers for both fields. So that may prove a problem for those concerned. Thanks again,

621:

So thanks for your message. Daily Variety and Chud weren't the only ones to not credit my article, but I can know in my heart that I played some role in getting this Internet firestorm started. Now there's even talks about getting it distributed nationally in 2008.

845:

This just really pissed me off, Jreferee. If Runcorn hadn't participated in your RfA (with his multiple socks), you would have passed. I see you've been inactive as of late, but I really do hope you come back and consider going up for adminship again, eventually.

415:. I hope I can live up to everyone's expectations. I will certainly take the constructive criticism I recieved to heart. Please, if you have any comments or complaints about my actions as an administrator, leave a note on my talk page. Thank you again· -- 1864:

We seem to be at the mercy of individual editors opinions here. Is there a Knowledge guideline stating how this should be handled that we can follow when someone else comes in and complains and if so, could you tell me where to find it? Thanks. -

973: 1931:

split myself had I noticed earlier. Eliminating the too large warning was a good goal, but not practical for a topic as large and messy as this. Unfortunately there's been too much stepping on toes in the meantime, which is the real problem. —

1434:

I disagree with your opinion regarding addressing the media through an article's talk page. I also think that this is a very interesting topic that the community at large should consider. As a result, I've opened a discussion on the topic

268:

issue of the WikiProject Biography newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you

1377:. If you would like me to motify any other aspect of it, leave me a message on my talk page. To add the sig, put it in the sig box and click the raw sig selection. Save it and then it is complete. I would also appreciate comments 187:

Unfortunately I already posted the thankyou message on all 68 supporters' pages...only then did I realise I hadn't actually put a signature on the template! Now I feel like a wikifool... Anyway, thanks again for your support.

1439:. In my introduction I've made an attempt at expressing your views. However, I've likely botched it. Feel free to directly edit my representation of your views and/or add your own thoughts on the matter. Thanks, 1907:

biography. Thank you. If you get a chance to look at what we've done your comments would be appreciated. We tried our best to bring the article more in line with the current biography standards. Again - thank you. -

686:

Please stop reposting the guts of the debated article to the RfC. The subject of the proceedings is the conduct of the people involved, and your actions are disruptive and are being seen as an 'end run' of sorts. -

908:

Wow. Thank you to whoever uncovered the sockpuppets. I also appreciate the immediate support from editors whose opinions I really respect. I'll participate in the discussion at the bureaucrats' noticeboard. --

114:, which was successful. I learned a lot from the comments, I appreciate everything that was said, and I'll do my best to deserve the community's trust. Thanks again! And thanks for your kind words and support. -- 1162: 1076:

With respect to your e-mail, I don't really see how undeleting all those talk pages would help. You probably edited some topic where your opinion didn't match his. I would suggest you simply run RFA again.

450:

and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!

265: 1875:

I'm not asking you to omit real and notable controversies. Just work them into the body of the article chronologically under one of the main sections instead of having them as bulleted items (per

612:

So a few months later, I was on Knowledge, searching random things that came into my head and seeing if they had an article on it. They did for every single one except the film, so I created it.

1010: 781:

admin roll and a significant RFC participatory roll in this matter for the very reasons discussed in the RfC. I do think you are a good guy, and I'm sure this will all work out in the end. --

2013:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any 1967:

JREFEREE . . . THANKS. THAT IS SO COOL. I USED ALL OF THE INFORMATION YOU HAVE GIVEN ME. AND I KNEW YOU HAD NO PROBLEMS. I SPELLED IT OUT FOR THE PEOPLE THAT MAY HAVE PROBLEMS.

494:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any 166: 304:

I think your point that it is unlikely to contribute meaningfully to internet search results in combination with the other points are good enought reasons to leave the content. --

1579:

We are a growing community of Knowledge editors dedicated to identifying, categorizing, and improving articles of interest to the LGBT community. Some points that may be helpful:

1478:. It's my first speedy delete that upset someone (and in ALL CAPS, too), so I guess I'm not a virgin anymore. It should be an... interesting AfD discussion. ;-) Thanks again! - 2009:

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

490:

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

564:

and was surprised to learn that the photos were not free images. I'll work on tagging them. Thanks again for restoring them. This should help me provide a proper tag. --

1278:

I apreciate your answer to my question on the help desk, it was very intelligent, and it gave me exactly what I needed to know, thank you for your kind help :). Reguards.

1230:, which passed 59/0/0! I will try very hard to live up to your expectations – please let me know if I can help you in any way, but first take your cookie! Thanks again! 1169:

We are in need of a lot of new biographies, also many of the existing ones need to be assessed and rated. So please check out the Taskforce and maybe consider joining.

111: 104: 64: 1680:

For your post, in reply to my comment on physchim62 talk page. His edit is no way a merge, because the content after merge is grossly different from the marged article.

609:

Well, I was right about the third-to-last film on the list. I was right about the next-to-last film on the list. And the list film, Jreferee, was called "Zyzzyx Road."

1606: 131:

Since additional commenters have raised points on each side of the issue, the nominator's withdrawl is not grounds for early closure, as far as I know. Best wishes,

767:

You're conflating two different things: firstly my audacious removal of the name from the RFC, and secondly, your inclusion of the contents of an article deleted on

1831:, which i feel is totally wrong (he has given no reasons whatsoever. If this persists, I would have no option but to dissuade myself from visiting wikipedia ever. 1617: 1602: 1227: 1610: 1598: 1475: 1708:

It looks like Tony figured things out before I could take a look, but I think I helped him get the result he was looking for. Thanks for the referral. Cheers,

2002:

if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see

483:

if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see

1722:

I am a point and shoot photographer (I.E., I don't do all that fancy photoshop stuff). I use my Xmas '05 Canon A620. An iso image would probably bolster the

1998:, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. 479:, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. 1047: 1583:

Our main aim is to help improve LGBT-related articles, so if someone asks for help with an article, please try your hardest to help them if you are able.

723:

The behavior you describe as reckless or aggressive is firmly supported by policy. If you again repeatedly repost the content of articles deleted under

816: 353: 2010: 1624: 491: 1632: 1587: 1378: 768: 752: 724: 408: 2018: 1051: 499: 141:

Thanks. I've always suspected that, but have seen early closure where additional commenters have raised points on each side of the issue. --

1059: 1744: 1571: 173: 383: 1954:

THEM. I DO NOT HAVE THE POWER TO CREATE THAT ENERGY IN ANYONE. AND THEY ALL HAVE THE POWER TO UNDERSTAND ME. IT IS THEIR CHOICE.

1748: 1752: 979: 1723: 1450: 946: 1656: 1136: 1119: 1453:. Since the post was not directed towards improving the associated article, it was subject to removal. I removed it. -- 1990:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 1505:

Thank You JReferee from me too. I am studying hard to get my Knowledge contributions right. Appreciate your guidance.

1413: 1390: 471:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 1609:, all of which you are welcome to take part in. We also have a unique program to improve our lower quality articles, 925:

I also share the same thoughts, that case of sockpuppetry was really unfair on you; if you run again, I´ll support.

819:. With the sockpuppet votes discounted, your RfA would have been within the discretionary range. I've posted on the 294:

I won't be closing James Boyce, anyway, because it needs more commenters first. I'll comment myself. Best wishes,

2003: 1339: 660:

Stop reposting problematic deleted content across the wiki. Claiming "but it's in my userspace" is not an excuse -

561: 527: 484: 197: 916:

I hope you run again for adminship, and don't let abusive users like Runcorn grind you down. Good luck if you do.

1790: 1130: 1113: 941: 521: 190: 1520: 1486: 1238: 517: 229: 1801: 1789:! I mostly search patterns of prime numbers but if you want an individual number then I suppose I like the 1936: 1740: 1407: 1384: 1309: 772: 728: 650: 625: 1338:. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the 642: 1782: 1316: 1292: 1279: 1000: 95: 76: 1986: 1794: 467: 93: 1497: 1330: 880: 575: 552: 532: 357: 1800:- reliably sourced of course; we are making an encyclopedia. And I have seen many variations of the 1188:, or instances of religiously motivated violence, that would be even better, if you wanted to join. 2022: 996: 853: 503: 270: 1436: 1824: 1479: 1231: 1078: 1027: 1017: 936: 917: 824: 695: 447: 225: 17: 1362:

Hello ther Jreferee. I have finished your sig. Here is the code <font face="Kristen ITC": -->

1215: 992:

the backlog of unassessed articles. The drive is running from June 1, 2007 – September 1, 2007.

628: 600: 55: 617: 1933: 1735: 1652: 1506: 1249: 874: 661: 345: 115: 366: 1995: 1809: 1768: 1349: 1181: 1172:

Also, If you are interested in and/or have any knowledge about any of the following topics:

837: 823:

to bring this to their attention, and am letting you know in case you have anything to say.

328: 250: 699: 1695: 1154: 596: 421: 327:

and the other retailing project people are the ones who should be referred to that page.

1999: 1971: 1958: 1550: 1288: 891: 849: 480: 453: 205: 178: 751:

You now indicate that the article was deleted because consensus deemed it falls under

242:

No edit to the introduction page counts as vandalism, its there for experimentation. -

1909: 1895: 1882: 1876: 1866: 1832: 1731: 1681: 1616:

If you have another language besides English, please consider adding yourself to our

1456: 1440: 1370: 1177: 929: 910: 864:

Yep, I think you should definitely run again Jreferee. We need more admins like you.

782: 759: 711: 688: 672: 565: 543: 305: 142: 1849:

article as trivia. This section was added back in August 2006 at the insistence of

2025: 1991: 1974: 1961: 1939: 1912: 1898: 1889: 1869: 1835: 1812: 1771: 1757: 1712: 1709: 1698: 1684: 1662: 1647: 1543: 1509: 1500: 1491: 1463: 1443: 1421: 1398: 1352: 1295: 1282: 1253: 1243: 1200: 1197: 1139: 1122: 1101: 1066: 953: 920: 896: 885: 866: 859: 840: 829: 820: 808: 785: 775: 762: 731: 714: 675: 664: 653: 578: 568: 555: 546: 535: 506: 472: 331: 308: 298: 273: 254: 232: 209: 145: 135: 118: 98: 79: 40: 1785:. I search prime number records and my favorite prime numbers are generally those 1862: 1850: 1786: 1428: 1262: 1157:

talkpage, you seem good at writting and then assessing and rating biographies.

476: 443: 417: 324: 244: 37: 1793:. There are two prime number jokes I have seen several times. I once added the 1561: 972: 591:

More people will ultimately read this comment then will have seen 'Zyzzyx Road'

1904: 1846: 1805: 1185: 1063: 1055: 1021: 295: 132: 1474:

Hi - thanks for letting me know about it. I've restored it and listed it at

1335: 70:

I am thankful and humbled by the trust that the community has placed in me,

1727: 551:

OK no worries I have restored the images, hopefully you will tag them.--

1694:

Thanks for putting the picture of the cake on my page. It made my day.

1321: 1173: 400: 382: 72:

and I welcome any comments, questions or complaints that you may have.

1928: 1828: 560:

Thanks Commander. I spent some time going through the flow chart at

524:. They were reuploaded to Commons but deleted there with the reason " 1334:, which you recently nominated, was featured in that section on the 1597:

The project has several ongoing and developing activities, such as

1927:

I not sure I'm the best choice to mediate. I'd have reversed the

436: 157: 1903:

Your comments were the incentive we needed to rework/rewrite the

1853:

when he failed the article during a good article review. See the

63:

Archive_9, thank you very much for your support in my successful

1325: 1451:

Knowledge:Talk page guidelines - How to use article talk pages

708:

China, France, Germany, Australia, United Kingdom, and Ireland

1560: 1261: 971: 435: 156: 54: 27:

Digital Dashboard (DD) vs. Dashboard of Sustainability (DoS)

260:

The WikiProject Biography Newsletter: Issue II - April 2007

323:

lists (I nominated one of them to begin with, after all).

602:) Now that I am completely off-track, let me continue. 1798: 1591: 1586:

Most important discussions take place on the project's

1274:

your answer to my answers.com question at the help desk

1050:

on myself in response to the concerns raised during my

812: 745: 646: 352:

Thank you, Jreferee, for your constructive comments in

1062:

and I welcome any comments or questions you may have.

595:

I first heard of this movie while browsing around on

74:

Again, thank you for your support, and happy editing!

1248:

NOTE: I'm not very creative, so I adopted this from

110:

Thanks so much for taking the time to comment on my

995:Awards to be won range from delicacies such as the 968:

WikiProject Biography Summer 2007 Assessment Drive!

811:was operating quite a few sockpuppet accounts (see 2017:will be deleted after seven days, as described on 962:WikiProject Biography Summer 2007 Assessment Drive 498:will be deleted after seven days, as described on 1623:If you're planning to stay, have a square in our 1767:Heh, yeah, that's amusing, thanks for the link. 815:). Many of these (six, in fact) voted to oppose 456:}} to their talk page with a friendly message. 1845:Hi. You tagged the controversy section of the 1730:page. Help is welcomed. Note the pic is up at 220:Thank you, I understand now... I will do it! 1620:, to help us improve our foreign LGBT topics. 1476:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/The Scary Guy 1046:Just wanted to let you know that I opened an 1016:This drive was conceived of and organized by 170:I was promoted with a final tally of 68/12/0. 8: 1980:Orphaned non-free image (Image:PWU Seal.JPG) 1804:joke. The first hit for me has a long list: 645:'s presentation and your outside statement 461:Orphaned non-free image (Image:PWU Seal.JPG) 1806:http://www.gdargaud.net/Humor/OddPrime.html 1404:Thanks for commenting on the discussion. -- 1304: 947: 930: 395: 340: 1222:Hello, Jreferee/Archive 9, and thank you 606:film that only played in a few theaters. 407:Thank you, Jreferee, for your support on 165:Hello Jreferee, thank you for supporting 1631:If you have any questions, feel free to 1406: 1383: 1160:Another Wikipedian and I just created a 1496:Thank you Jreferee for your help. Scary 1009:articles to assess so please visit the 746:01:53, 22 May 2007 post on my talk page 1791:largest known doubly palindromic prime 1627:! You can put anything you want in it. 1613:, so please consider signing up there. 365: 172:Also, please wish a Happy Birthday to 1753:tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM 1449:I reviewed my post in the context of 36:with a highly specialized audience. 7: 1635:, and we will be happy to help you. 1607:a project-wide article collaboration 1590:; it is highly recommended that you 574:are an excellent communicator :-).-- 1994:. However, the image is currently 1957:LOVE TO YOU JREFEREE. YOU ROCK!!! 1880: 1454: 1368: 1025: 890:I also would like to see you run. 475:. However, the image is currently 446:has smiled at you! Smiles promote 24: 807:It's recently been revealed that 1308: 1214: 727:, further steps may be taken. -- 399: 381: 344: 1704:Re: Template:Infobox MLB player 1556: 1209: 649:make no comments on the RFC. -- 531:" - they are not free images.-- 50: 1226:for your support in my recent 1153:From seeing your edits to the 926: 847: 1: 2004:our policy for non-free media 1163:Salem Witch Trials task force 1058:dispute. The RfC is located 988:The goal of this drive is to 769:Biographies of living persons 753:Biographies of living persons 725:Biographies of living persons 485:our policy for non-free media 2019:criteria for speedy deletion 1861:on this archived talk page. 1781:Answer to your questions at 1408: 1385: 500:criteria for speedy deletion 452:Smile at others by adding {{ 398: 380: 343: 1802:"all odd numbers are prime" 315:Userfication of store lists 2041: 1859:Discussion moved from todo 1638:And once again - Welcome! 1599:article quality assessment 1328:, a fact from the article 1221: 590: 332:00:05, 27 April 2007 (UTC) 309:20:32, 25 April 2007 (UTC) 299:14:39, 25 April 2007 (UTC) 274:18:53, 24 April 2007 (UTC) 255:22:25, 23 April 2007 (UTC) 233:04:06, 25 April 2007 (UTC) 210:17:44, 21 April 2007 (UTC) 146:20:06, 20 April 2007 (UTC) 136:19:54, 20 April 2007 (UTC) 119:04:39, 20 April 2007 (UTC) 99:21:33, 15 April 2007 (UTC) 80:22:39, 13 April 2007 (UTC) 41:07:02, 16 April 2007 (UTC) 2026:06:31, 21 June 2007 (UTC) 1975:20:12, 21 June 2007 (UTC) 1962:02:58, 21 June 2007 (UTC) 1940:01:46, 21 June 2007 (UTC) 1913:03:13, 23 June 2007 (UTC) 1899:02:12, 21 June 2007 (UTC) 1890:02:09, 21 June 2007 (UTC) 1870:21:39, 20 June 2007 (UTC) 1836:04:40, 20 June 2007 (UTC) 1813:00:18, 19 June 2007 (UTC) 1772:02:15, 19 June 2007 (UTC) 1758:00:31, 19 June 2007 (UTC) 1713:00:06, 19 June 2007 (UTC) 1699:15:49, 18 June 2007 (UTC) 1685:09:09, 18 June 2007 (UTC) 1663:01:49, 16 June 2007 (UTC) 1570:Hi, Jreferee, welcome to 1559: 1544:21:00, 15 June 2007 (UTC) 1510:17:16, 14 June 2007 (UTC) 1501:03:36, 14 June 2007 (UTC) 1492:20:00, 13 June 2007 (UTC) 1464:18:48, 13 June 2007 (UTC) 1444:18:12, 13 June 2007 (UTC) 1422:22:29, 11 June 2007 (UTC) 1399:20:20, 11 June 2007 (UTC) 1353:08:42, 10 June 2007 (UTC) 522:Image:PPSJIIIboxfront.JPG 1572:WikiProject LGBT Studies 1551:WikiProject LGBT studies 1296:18:45, 9 June 2007 (UTC) 1283:18:45, 9 June 2007 (UTC) 1244:00:36, 9 June 2007 (UTC) 1201:00:35, 9 June 2007 (UTC) 1140:21:24, 6 June 2007 (UTC) 1123:20:53, 6 June 2007 (UTC) 1102:08:08, 5 June 2007 (UTC) 1067:03:55, 2 June 2007 (UTC) 954:23:55, 9 June 2007 (UTC) 921:13:57, 5 June 2007 (UTC) 897:20:15, 2 June 2007 (UTC) 886:17:35, 2 June 2007 (UTC) 860:17:31, 2 June 2007 (UTC) 841:16:36, 2 June 2007 (UTC) 830:01:57, 1 June 2007 (UTC) 821:bureaucrats' noticeboard 786:21:37, 23 May 2007 (UTC) 776:20:48, 23 May 2007 (UTC) 763:20:38, 23 May 2007 (UTC) 732:18:47, 23 May 2007 (UTC) 715:18:43, 23 May 2007 (UTC) 700:19:51, 22 May 2007 (UTC) 676:17:32, 22 May 2007 (UTC) 665:17:16, 22 May 2007 (UTC) 654:01:53, 22 May 2007 (UTC) 629:19:19, 18 May 2007 (UTC) 579:11:09, 19 May 2007 (UTC) 569:17:20, 18 May 2007 (UTC) 562:Commons:Derivative works 556:01:20, 17 May 2007 (UTC) 547:16:31, 16 May 2007 (UTC) 536:06:33, 15 May 2007 (UTC) 528:Commons:Derivative works 518:Image:PPSJIIIboxback.JPG 507:04:02, 14 May 2007 (UTC) 411:, which recently passed 319:Thanks, but they're not 1795:"2 is the oddest prime" 1672:Thanks for the article 1340:Did you know? talk page 1054:over my actions in the 422:18:34, 1 May 2007 (UTC) 105:Shirahadasha RfA thanks 1827:article once again to 1565: 1266: 976: 440: 230:Wikimania1011 UserTalk 161: 59: 1984:Thanks for uploading 1783:User talk:PrimeHunter 1564: 1265: 980:WikiProject Biography 975: 681: 526:Derivative work, see 465:Thanks for uploading 439: 174:Her Majesty the Queen 160: 58: 1726:page as well as the 1633:ask on the talk page 1588:main discussion page 1367:, which shows up as 1364:''(])''</sup: --> 1363:''']''' <sup: --> 1331:Abdulsalami Abubakar 391: 362:Thank you once more, 287:in your innovation. 2000:You may add it back 1797:joke to Knowledge 1618:translation section 1287:who's been copying 1252:who swiped it from 1132:Anonymous Dissident 1115:Anonymous Dissident 481:You may add it back 1987:Image:PWU Seal.JPG 1945:ME AND MY CAPITALS 1877:BLP Trivia section 1825:Energy (chemistry) 1566: 1267: 977: 637:My edit to the RFC 468:Image:PWU Seal.JPG 441: 162: 60: 18:User talk:Jreferee 1992:claim of fair use 1756: 1643: 1642: 1470:Re: The Scary Guy 1409:Tλε Rαnδom Eδιτor 1386:Tλε Rαnδom Eδιτor 1346: 1345: 1271: 1270: 1107:merge of dyk list 1020:with the help of 1001:Golden Wiki Award 986:assessment drive! 895: 828: 800:Your previous RfA 692: 626:Free-encyclopedia 473:claim of fair use 428: 427: 392:My (Selket's) RfA 389: 388: 252: 207: 181: 86: 85: 2032: 2011:my contributions 1888: 1885: 1738: 1668:king of pakistan 1661: 1660: 1557: 1540: 1538: 1536: 1534: 1532: 1519:You've got one! 1489: 1484: 1462: 1459: 1419: 1416: 1410: 1396: 1393: 1387: 1376: 1373: 1320:was updated. On 1312: 1305: 1257: 1241: 1236: 1218: 1210: 1182:colonial America 1133: 1116: 1098: 1096: 1094: 1092: 1090: 1036: 1033: 1030: 984:three month long 951: 950: 944: 939: 934: 933: 928: 894: 869: 858: 857: 836:again. Regards, 827: 690: 492:my contributions 403: 396: 385: 377: 348: 341: 249: 247: 208: 204: 202: 195: 182: 177: 96:Michael G. Davis 77:Hemlock Martinis 51: 2040: 2039: 2035: 2034: 2033: 2031: 2030: 2029: 1982: 1947: 1925: 1883: 1843: 1820: 1779: 1765: 1720: 1706: 1692: 1678: 1670: 1650: 1646: 1576: 1555: 1530: 1528: 1526: 1524: 1522: 1517: 1487: 1480: 1472: 1457: 1432: 1414: 1391: 1371: 1360: 1303: 1276: 1247: 1239: 1232: 1219: 1208: 1155:Roger Toothaker 1148: 1131: 1114: 1109: 1088: 1086: 1084: 1082: 1080: 1074: 1044: 1039: 1031: 1028: 970: 964: 948: 942: 937: 931: 867: 848: 802: 684: 639: 597:Box Office Mojo 593: 576:Commander Keane 553:Commander Keane 533:Commander Keane 516:I have deleted 514: 463: 458: 433: 394: 358:frying my brain 339: 317: 281: 262: 245: 240: 218: 198: 191: 189: 184: 164: 154: 126: 108: 91: 49: 29: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 2038: 2036: 2023:BetacommandBot 1981: 1978: 1966: 1946: 1943: 1924: 1921: 1920: 1919: 1918: 1917: 1916: 1915: 1894:Ok. Thanks. - 1842: 1839: 1819: 1816: 1778: 1775: 1764: 1761: 1719: 1716: 1705: 1702: 1691: 1688: 1677: 1674: 1669: 1666: 1641: 1640: 1629: 1628: 1621: 1614: 1595: 1584: 1568: 1554: 1547: 1516: 1513: 1471: 1468: 1467: 1466: 1431: 1426: 1425: 1424: 1366:</font: --> 1365:</font: --> 1359: 1356: 1344: 1343: 1313: 1302: 1299: 1275: 1272: 1269: 1268: 1259: 1220: 1213: 1207: 1204: 1147: 1144: 1143: 1142: 1108: 1105: 1073: 1070: 1043: 1040: 1013:and help out! 1004: 987: 966: 965: 963: 960: 959: 958: 957: 956: 906: 905: 904: 903: 902: 901: 900: 899: 892:User:Zscout370 801: 798: 797: 796: 795: 794: 793: 792: 791: 790: 789: 788: 756: 750: 737: 736: 735: 734: 718: 717: 683: 680: 679: 678: 643:Badlydrawnjeff 638: 635: 633: 592: 589: 588: 587: 586: 585: 584: 583: 582: 581: 513: 512:Images deleted 510: 504:BetacommandBot 462: 459: 451: 434: 432: 429: 426: 425: 404: 393: 390: 387: 386: 379: 363: 361: 349: 338: 335: 316: 313: 312: 311: 280: 277: 271:BetacommandBot 261: 258: 239: 236: 223: 217: 214: 213: 212: 171: 169: 155: 153: 150: 149: 148: 125: 122: 107: 102: 90: 87: 84: 83: 75: 73: 71: 68: 61: 48: 45: 28: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2037: 2028: 2027: 2024: 2021:. Thank you. 2020: 2016: 2012: 2007: 2005: 2001: 1997: 1993: 1989: 1988: 1979: 1977: 1976: 1973: 1968: 1964: 1963: 1960: 1955: 1951: 1944: 1942: 1941: 1938: 1935: 1934:Laura Scudder 1930: 1922: 1914: 1911: 1906: 1902: 1901: 1900: 1897: 1893: 1892: 1891: 1887: 1886: 1878: 1874: 1873: 1872: 1871: 1868: 1863: 1860: 1856: 1852: 1848: 1840: 1838: 1837: 1834: 1830: 1826: 1817: 1815: 1814: 1811: 1807: 1803: 1799: 1796: 1792: 1788: 1784: 1777:Prime numbers 1776: 1774: 1773: 1770: 1763:re Mike Magee 1762: 1760: 1759: 1754: 1750: 1746: 1742: 1737: 1733: 1729: 1725: 1717: 1715: 1714: 1711: 1703: 1701: 1700: 1697: 1689: 1687: 1686: 1683: 1675: 1673: 1667: 1665: 1664: 1658: 1654: 1649: 1639: 1636: 1634: 1626: 1622: 1619: 1615: 1612: 1608: 1604: 1600: 1596: 1593: 1589: 1585: 1582: 1581: 1580: 1577: 1575: 1573: 1563: 1558: 1552: 1548: 1546: 1545: 1542: 1541: 1514: 1512: 1511: 1508: 1503: 1502: 1499: 1494: 1493: 1490: 1485: 1483: 1477: 1469: 1465: 1461: 1460: 1452: 1448: 1447: 1446: 1445: 1442: 1438: 1430: 1427: 1423: 1420: 1417: 1411: 1403: 1402: 1401: 1400: 1397: 1394: 1388: 1380: 1375: 1374: 1357: 1355: 1354: 1351: 1341: 1337: 1333: 1332: 1327: 1323: 1319: 1318: 1317:Did you know? 1314: 1311: 1307: 1306: 1300: 1298: 1297: 1294: 1293:81.154.111.25 1290: 1285: 1284: 1281: 1280:81.154.111.25 1273: 1264: 1260: 1258: 1255: 1251: 1245: 1242: 1237: 1235: 1229: 1225: 1217: 1212: 1211: 1205: 1203: 1202: 1199: 1195: 1192: 1189: 1187: 1183: 1179: 1178:Massachusetts 1175: 1170: 1167: 1165: 1164: 1158: 1156: 1151: 1145: 1141: 1138: 1137: 1134: 1127: 1126: 1125: 1124: 1121: 1120: 1117: 1106: 1104: 1103: 1100: 1099: 1071: 1069: 1068: 1065: 1061: 1057: 1053: 1049: 1041: 1038: 1035: 1034: 1023: 1019: 1014: 1012: 1008: 1002: 999:to the great 998: 993: 991: 985: 982:is holding a 981: 974: 969: 961: 955: 952: 945: 940: 935: 924: 923: 922: 919: 918:LuciferMorgan 915: 914: 913: 912: 898: 893: 889: 888: 887: 883: 882: 877: 876: 871: 870: 863: 862: 861: 855: 851: 844: 843: 842: 839: 834: 833: 832: 831: 826: 825:Seraphimblade 822: 818: 814: 810: 805: 799: 787: 784: 779: 778: 777: 774: 770: 766: 765: 764: 761: 754: 747: 743: 742: 741: 740: 739: 738: 733: 730: 726: 722: 721: 720: 719: 716: 713: 709: 704: 703: 702: 701: 697: 693: 677: 674: 669: 668: 667: 666: 663: 658: 656: 655: 652: 647: 644: 636: 634: 631: 630: 627: 623: 619: 618: 613: 610: 607: 603: 601: 598: 580: 577: 572: 571: 570: 567: 563: 559: 558: 557: 554: 550: 549: 548: 545: 540: 539: 538: 537: 534: 530: 529: 523: 519: 511: 509: 508: 505: 502:. Thank you. 501: 497: 493: 488: 486: 482: 478: 474: 470: 469: 460: 457: 455: 449: 445: 438: 430: 424: 423: 420: 419: 414: 410: 409:my recent RfA 405: 402: 397: 384: 378: 376: 375: 372: 369: 359: 355: 354:my recent RFA 350: 347: 342: 336: 334: 333: 330: 326: 322: 314: 310: 307: 303: 302: 301: 300: 297: 292: 288: 284: 278: 276: 275: 272: 267: 259: 257: 256: 253: 251: 248: 237: 235: 234: 231: 227: 226:Wikimania1011 221: 215: 211: 206: 203: 201: 196: 194: 186: 185: 183: 180: 179:Vivat Regina! 175: 168: 159: 151: 147: 144: 140: 139: 138: 137: 134: 129: 123: 121: 120: 117: 113: 106: 103: 101: 100: 97: 94: 88: 82: 81: 78: 66: 62: 57: 53: 52: 46: 44: 42: 39: 33: 26: 19: 2014: 2008: 1985: 1983: 1969: 1965: 1956: 1952: 1948: 1926: 1881: 1858: 1854: 1844: 1821: 1780: 1766: 1736:TonyTheTiger 1721: 1707: 1693: 1679: 1671: 1644: 1637: 1630: 1592:watchlist it 1578: 1569: 1567: 1521: 1518: 1507:Whatevernext 1504: 1495: 1481: 1473: 1455: 1433: 1405: 1382: 1369: 1361: 1347: 1329: 1315: 1291:userpage?... 1286: 1277: 1250:RyanGerbil10 1246: 1233: 1223: 1196: 1193: 1190: 1171: 1168: 1161: 1159: 1152: 1150:Hi Jaferee, 1149: 1135: 1118: 1110: 1079: 1075: 1045: 1026: 1015: 1011:drive's page 1007:over 110,000 1006: 994: 989: 983: 978: 967: 907: 879: 873: 865: 806: 803: 773:Tony Sidaway 771:grounds. -- 729:Tony Sidaway 707: 685: 662:David Gerard 659: 657: 651:Tony Sidaway 641:I've edited 640: 632: 624: 620: 614: 611: 608: 604: 594: 525: 515: 495: 489: 466: 464: 442: 416: 412: 406: 373: 370: 367: 360:, of course. 351: 320: 318: 293: 289: 285: 282: 263: 243: 241: 222: 219: 199: 192: 163: 130: 127: 116:Shirahadasha 109: 92: 69: 34: 30: 1810:PrimeHunter 1769:Herostratus 1724:Chris Young 1718:Chris Young 1603:peer review 1549:Welcome to 1498:24.31.250.3 1429:David Chase 1350:Carabinieri 1194:Sincerely, 1024:. Regards, 838:Newyorkbrad 744:Tony, your 454:subst:Smile 329:Daniel Case 325:User:Tuxide 1905:Clay Aiken 1855:To do list 1847:Clay Aiken 1841:Trivia tag 1818:Hi Jrefree 1787:I discover 1696:Smartyshoe 1611:Jumpaclass 1186:witchcraft 1056:Gary Weiss 1005:There are 997:WikiCookie 804:Jreferee, 337:RFA thanks 266:April 2007 1358:Signature 1336:Main Page 1289:Someone's 1146:Taskforce 1018:Psychless 990:eliminate 850:Nishkid64 813:AN thread 682:C'mon now 2015:articles 1996:orphaned 1970:LOVE YA, 1910:Maria202 1896:Maria202 1884:Jreferee 1867:Maria202 1857:and the 1833:Hallenrm 1728:fastball 1682:Hallenrm 1657:contribs 1482:Krakatoa 1458:Jreferee 1441:Rklawton 1372:Jreferee 1234:Krakatoa 1191:Thanks! 911:Jreferee 817:your RfA 783:Jreferee 760:Jreferee 712:Jreferee 673:Jreferee 566:Jreferee 544:Jreferee 496:articles 477:orphaned 448:WikiLove 306:Jreferee 238:WP:INTRO 143:Jreferee 1710:Caknuck 1648:SatyrTN 1322:10 June 1254:Misza13 1224:so much 1198:Psdubow 1174:History 1072:Runcorn 868:Majorly 809:Runcorn 691:HAIRBOY 167:my RfA! 47:Thanks! 43:rjlabs 1929:energy 1923:Energy 1851:Davodd 1829:Energy 1732:WP:FPC 1690:Thanks 1676:Thanks 1206:My RFA 444:JuJube 418:Selket 413:54/1/1 371:ndonic 216:Thanks 152:My RfA 112:my RfA 1972:Scary 1959:Scary 1625:quilt 1515:Email 1488:Katie 1240:Katie 1081:: --> 1032:less 1029:Psych 1022:Ozgod 431:Smile 296:Xoloz 133:Xoloz 16:< 1653:talk 1605:and 1437:here 1415:ταlκ 1392:ταlκ 1381:. -- 1379:here 1326:2007 1097:< 1060:here 881:meet 875:talk 854:talk 520:and 283:Hi, 264:The 128:Hi, 38:Rick 2006:). 1749:bio 1645:-- 1301:DYK 1228:RFA 1166:. 1064:CLA 1052:RfA 1048:RfC 1042:RfC 949:Bat 932:Tom 487:). 279:DRV 200:ton 193:Wal 124:DRV 89:DRV 65:RfA 1808:. 1755:) 1734:. 1655:| 1601:, 1539:te 1537:ai 1535:hw 1533:et 1531:tl 1529:os 1525:an 1523:Ry 1348:-- 1342:. 1324:, 1184:, 1180:, 1176:, 1037:. 884:) 878:| 698:) 364:· 321:my 224:-- 176:. 1937:☎ 1751:/ 1747:/ 1745:c 1743:/ 1741:t 1739:( 1659:) 1651:( 1594:. 1574:! 1553:! 1527:P 1418:) 1412:( 1395:) 1389:( 1095:t 1093:n 1091:a 1089:i 1087:d 1085:a 1083:R 1003:. 943:s 938:@ 927:♠ 872:( 856:) 852:( 706:( 696:☎ 694:( 689:C 374:O 368:A 246:M 228:- 67:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index