29:
85:? I don't think so, even though you have provided several references to articles which mention your company. The problem is that, as employees of this company and therefore directly involved with it, you are not in a very good position ot be an independent, clear-eyed judge of the notability of your company.
100:
If another editor ses fit to write an article about your company, and can prove that it meets notability standards, so be it. But that is for someone else withough a conflict of interest. -
46:
42:
92:. Your stated goal is to figure out some way to get a Knowledge (XXG) article about your small company. That is not for you to do because of
96:. The article is currently severely compromised by your actions, to the point where I believe it is beyond help and should be deleted.
57:
38:
17:
106:
62:
89:
93:
101:
52:
82:
28:
111:
67:
90:
Knowledge (XXG) policies against advertising and self-promotion
88:
You are promoting your company, which is a direct violation of
45:
for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with
43:Knowledge (XXG):Suspected sock puppets/AI Shawn
8:
7:
83:notable by Knowledge (XXG) standards
73:Notability an conflict of interest
49:before editing the evidence page.
14:
27:
1:
77:There are two problems here.
23:
94:conflict of interest issues
127:
37:You have been accused of
112:05:19, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
68:16:19, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
81:Is your company really
47:notes for the suspect
41:. Please refer to
110:
35:
34:
118:
104:
60:
55:
31:
24:
126:
125:
121:
120:
119:
117:
116:
115:
75:
58:
53:
22:
12:
11:
5:
124:
122:
98:
97:
86:
74:
71:
33:
32:
21:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
123:
114:
113:
108:
103:
95:
91:
87:
84:
80:
79:
78:
72:
70:
69:
66:
65:
64:
61:
56:
48:
44:
40:
30:
26:
25:
19:
16:
99:
76:
63:(yada, yada)
51:
50:
39:sockpuppetry
36:
18:Sockpuppetry
107:Talk to me
102:Realkyhick
59:crewer
54:brew
20:case
109:)
105:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
