User talk:Judae1 - Knowledge (XXG)

971:, www.judaengelmayer.com - nothing hidden. I have not caused damage, but agree to not cause any damage. I understand that you blocked me because I have edited certain pages that someone thinks are connected to me, or from websites. I do not do that, an I will continue not to do that. I believe I have made useful contributions, such as finding references for linda park of Enterprise fame. I urge you to reconsider, and please look at my history and see that my edits are within your wiki rules and in keeping with the good community Thank you I'd like to have a discussion on this. When I was accused in the past it was being part of a firm where a single party was accused of trying to edit a page a certain way and engaged in edit wars and challenges. It wasn't me then. Here I don't even see edit wars and battles and any harm i have caused. There are no controversies, and with minor and appropriate exception, I have not edited pages of clients. Where I did, I admit it and made correct edits. This is a surprise. − The page says that a user should not mislead, deceive, vandalize or disrupt; to create the illusion of greater support for a position; to stir up controversy; or to circumvent a block, ban, or sanction. I have not done any of this above, and I just went through some of the users you attribute allege are me too, and none of them seem to be in edit wars, trying to stir controversy, removing blocks or bans, not entering debates to create support and especially not to vandalize. All edits that I have been reading seem to be in keeping with updating Knowledge (XXG) with real information and useful data, properly referenced. This must be reviewed. 1143:

issues, because I have been an editor for 11 years and have been involved in many edit controversies, but you cannot point to an edit that I have made that is polluting or trashing, or whatever. Even, as I said, the other IDs referred to, have not from what I see, been engaged in polluting with trash. I appreciate that you don't think I would do this, but even with that caveat, what have I done? I am not going to speak for anyone else, but the folks at Wiki ought to value the edits made at face value. They are mostly solid. To your point, and your experience interacting with me, how many WIkipedians actually admit who they are? I am among the few who has been open and never hid it. Now I am punished. What it does is force me to go underground. I enjoy Knowledge (XXG) and will continue, but obviously may now have to now sign up under a pseudonym and another email address. That is not what the people here want to expect. Everyone has always been able to watch me. That may not be possible anymore. Why is that better? I do appreciate your support though, and thank you

1196:

proper disclosure. Where I was challenged and disagreed with, I didn't persist, but never made a secret of it. Then you assert - "I see you and all the socks editing it directly and no COI disclosures," but I can say with certainty I do not work for him and have no COI here at all. If the only answer here that is acceptable is a different opinion, it's unfortunate. Fact is that I have met him twice in my life, and I am 48, due to the nature of my work. I paid more attention to him recently because when I left my old firm I was looking at beginning a new publication in NJ and recognized how hard it was. Offline I would share with you the name of the publication which is active in another region, and what my involvement was, but needless to say, it is hard work and I became genuinely impressed with how this figure tapped into a market that is so challenged today and how it operates. That is my involvement.

1086:, when you say "This makes the "other people at my firm" reasoning hard to understand" what are you referring to? I don't think I said anything like that. I did leave my old firm and I have begun my own company, and not a single entity, person, company whatever, that I edit is a client, pays me or whatever. As a PR person, I know the rules here too. Anytime i ever made changes for a client I disclosed it, and did it to change a fact or issue using real sources and in keeping with Wiki's standards; never to "dump pollution", but to improve and make better what is already there. 1701:, a man a read about, then reached out to for speak about his ordeal - for nothing other than subject matter interest. The only difference here is that the most recent subject has a media empire and is/was not an underdog as the other two are, so to speak. For some, that makes it a problem because of perception, but it is no different. I have no conflict other than interest, and having interest in a subject is what makes any Knowledge (XXG) editor worthwhile - interest enough to study, find valid sources, useful photos and more information. If you look at the 1351:

magazine and learned the hard way how challenging it is. I work in a big branded shared office space building and I know a few people who edit and this person has been discussed. Knowledge (XXG) relies on people who have interests and knowledge, willing to research and share. My history here is filled with it, from early New York cooperatives and unions, Jewish and Israeli interest, my work on Ken Kraus, having learned about him from a book my father wrote, and Star Trek related articles. I have interests and i write about them.

2200: 46: 99: 250: 1607: 882: 702: 2611: 2478: 2367: 2256: 2084: 1973: 1782: 623: 134: 1108:. I do hear you, when you describe yourself, and the edits from this account match what you say. Based on how you represent yourself and my experience of you interacting you, i was dismayed to see this case - you don't ~seem~ to me to be the kind of person who would do this. I had all that in mind, when i wrote what I wrote. This 415:? I'm having difficulty locating the required disclosure of your recent paid edits. I can also see other socks editing for clients of your firm, including ones making edits on your behalf. Would you be interested in disclosing any of those? It might be a good idea to sit down with your peers and discuss an ethical approach here. 1045:

I would like to regain my editing ability and appeal to you for this. I ask what you want to know? I have no COI, have no connection and no relationship to the person or company. What I can't understand is why because of an interest, no matter how fervent, does that mean a COI? it doesn't, but for

1706:

avoid any topics that are of controversial nature, I will keep to myself and not engage in edit challenges, and I will not use multiple accounts. I would like objectivity here, some review of my eleven years as an editor, and some real valuation of my contributions to this terrific forum. Thank you.

1142:

I never said they were in my firm, I am small with a few people working with me I do work in a shared space though, a We-work in the city. Also, when you say "they are not me: I don't do that" is what every sockmaster says..." but if it is true, then we are at an impasse. I hear this and know the

1064:

Your last comment is more on point. The people using the checkuser tools found technical similarities in where these edits came from. The key thing in addition to that is behavior. The edits in the current case are the (depressingly) very typical promotional undisclosed paid editing by PR people,

1728:

You have been blocked for sock puppetry and this appeal, as with many of your comments above, fails to properly address this. Therefore I am declining your appeal. Blocked users have access to their talk pages solely for appealing their block and/or dealing with matters that are directly related to

1222:

Please be aware that when I said "you and the socks" I was not asserting that they are all one person. You. The socks (which definitely appear related to one another - the only question here is if they are related to you). And it is a fact that there is no COI disclosure. These were all facts,

1500:

I just can't understand how you keep reading things I don't say. None of my staff is on Knowledge (XXG) and none edit or participate. None of the people you're referring to work with me or for me. Do you know what WeWork facility is? It's independent people. My company has nothing to do with

1195:

I have not made any recent changes for any clients, and when I edited RT's page I used the talk pages always and showed/proved my edits were merited. In the past, I have also notified on the talk pages If I touched it. COI's are not wise, but there has always been room for appropriate edits with

1160:

Pardon me for kind of shifting topics here, but the following is related. Part of PAID and COI is that editors who are paid or who have a COI need to a) disclose where they have a COI and b) not edit directly. You have been directly editing the article about Torrossian, which you should not have

433:

for what it is worth... i have not reviewed the recent SPI case but i looked at Judae1's edits in the past. he appears to me very distinct from the sockmaster Babasalichai. Very very different edits and interests; they do cross at the Ronn Torossian article but Judae1 has refrained from directly

1705:

I was editing, there is wrongful information on it that I had tried to change, and it was reversed by an editor with little regard to Knowledge (XXG) fact checking. However, I do not want to debate it and I want to edit general pieces again. I will emphatically say that I will do my very best to

1068:

The contribs by the socks are both before and after the September 2016 date that you name on your userpage as when you left the old firm ( I would guess that you are with a different PR firm now...). This makes the "other people at my firm" reasoning hard to understand. And even if it is other

1344:

Thank you for now having that conversation after you blocked and ignored me. if you read anywhere, I'm not sure you will ever once see me say "I don't know" them. I think I just inferred that I'm not them/him/her whoever. And I am not. I am also not sure editing an article that someone in my

330:

Please take a look at my edit history and see what I have contributed. This is patently unfair and I am being held responsible for what others have done. My edit history is solid, I have always disclosed my identify, and my edits have been within Knowledge (XXG) boundaries. I use talk pages for

1350:

However, I can be clear because of this issue that I want resolved. I have a curious interest in how this man/subject has managed to run a publishing empire at a time when publishing print is dying. For selfish interest I have been studying him as I was/am looking at partneing in an unrelated

1692:

I know that there is a serious claim against me regarding the use of multiple accounts, and I know some of the users involved and do not know others. However, I do know that the charge against me was levied due to editing an article that I have no COI with at all; no money, no agreements, no

473:

The anger of the Knowledge (XXG) community at the unscrupulous and despicable conduct of the Ronn Torossian sockpuppet - an anger that I share - is perfectly understandable, and the corporate ban is justified. In the case of this user, however, I think it is reasonable to make an exception.

1373:). We don't care if all those accounts belong to you, or they belong to different people who work with you and edit in the same way you do. From Knowledge (XXG)'s point of view, it's the same. You are trying do defend yourself, but basically you are admitting you engaged in meatpupptry. 1729:

their block. Your discursive conversations have become unproductive and wander off into matters that are not pertinent to your block and, consequently, are unhelpful to the appeal process. I am therefore revoking your talk page access. If you wish to appeal again then you now must use

1324:

possible that five people who do not know each other are editing the same page from the same location by coincidence. You have to explain us what's going on. Saying "I don't know them" will not help you because it's not possible. In your response, please explain us what's going on.

997:. You know this person and were working with them two years ago before your change of office. The checkuser confirmed both of your accounts in the same place much, much more recently. You haven't made an adequate accounting of relationships to these other editors. Declined. 1949:*(diff) 2016-12-28T20:22:07 . . Judae1 (talk | contribs | block) (27,645 bytes) (→‎Contemporary history (2012–present): fixed ref break) *(diff) 2016-12-28T20:18:51 . . Judae1 (talk | contribs | block) (27,643 bytes) (Added and moved MMOG to better place) 546:, and believe the block on this account is unjustified. While Juda and I have had our issues early on, my understand is that his edits are either on subjects where there is no 5W interest or housekeeping, non-controversial edits where there is interest. 1417:

sock puppetry episode. Judae1 was at that time a senior executive in 5WPR, Torossian's firm. Torossian engaged in blatant and malicious sockpuppetry, much of which was the editing of articles about 5WPR's clients. Judae1 was implicated but later

1452:

Considering the absence of a clear motive for violating Knowledge (XXG)'s rules on multiple accounts, and Judae1's own admirable editing history, it seems to me that this decision is overly harsh. Perhaps a severe warning would be more in

1442:

conflict of interest here, something which would support the charge of malicious sockpuppetry. And, while Judae1's contention that the multiple users emerging from the same IP address are not him is a bit hard to believe, it is still

1395:

I'm not sure what language you speak, but you continue to out words in my mouth. I never said these work for for or with me. I know some and they don't work with me or for me. I will keep fighting this because you are wrong.

1427:

Since then, Judae1 has been a positive editor of Knowledge (XXG), adding a lot of stuff in a wide range of topic areas. He left 5WPR two years ago to found his own PR firm, and, as far as I know, is no longer associated with

1345:

vicinity is editing is illegal or even voting to keep an article almost a year and a half ago is. I don't think Knowledge (XXG) rules say that two people in the same zip code, IP address or region cannot participate.

1462:

Again, it has been a good while since I was involved in this issue, and the blocking administrators may know much more than I. But I felt it was appropriate to add my two cents to the discussion, albeit belatedly.

1065:

dumping pollution into Knowledge (XXG). This is a different matter from the edits that were apparently made by accounts by or representing Torrosian that were overly-fiercely trying to manage his reputation here.

1115:

Do you have any way to make sense out of the editing of the associated accounts? The assertion "they are not me: I don't do that" is what every sockmaster says, and isn't helping you or the editing community.

809:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

1437:

The subjects of the articles that were edited by Judae1 and the apparent sockpuppets are not, as far as I can tell, clients of either 5WPR or Herald PR, Judae1's new firm. So there does not appear to be a

354:

At the time I reviewed and closed the SPI case, I was unaware of any wider discussion involving this company or this user. Given the much weaker technical and behavioral evidence connecting

1900:

that was an undisclosed paid editor and this was less than a year ago. They didn't come clean in previous sock blocks / unblock requests but insisted they were uninvolved. Not believable.

394:

is examined these days with a laser-like focus, so I encourage you to remain above-board in regards to any paid editing, or any editing of articles related to yourself or your company. —

1570:

is an example of due process and how it should be done. The way mine was handled is wrong. I am disappointed in this system, where no one has to prove an COI, just make claims to it.

488:

I am urging no such thing. I'm seeking to understand the situation and offer Mr. Engelmayer an opportunity to disclose information that may be helpful in assessing the situation.

1734: 464:

and his PR company. The user has never made a secret of his affiliation, and has always been scrupulous about abiding by Knowledge (XXG)'s guidelines for conflicts of interest.

1547:

You have whatever answer you want to believe, and nothing I say mattera. So I ask you how do I resolve this to your satisfaction? I would like to work this out. Thank you

1262: 107: 103: 1261:

I will say a last thing. If you read through the block notice carefully, it has a link to the sockpuppet investigation, and if you read that, there is a link there to

1304:) that are editing from the same location as you do. You say you don't know them. But, those accounts were editing the same pages as you did, making similar edits to 1046:

reasons unknown, it is decided I have one. I'm not looking to fight, I just want to know what I need to do to get back to editing that would satisfy you? Thank you

553:

that there needs to be more transparency. The firm needs to disclose when an employee or a paid editor is making edits to a client article (or enemy article, like

993:

I do not find your answers plausible. In addition to the evidence already pointed out to you, you attempted to get an article for one of the socks past review

642: 1771:

template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

1035:

template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

873:

template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

571:

You cannot hold Judae1 responsible for what other people at 5W do. I actually asked him to see what he could do and he said he has limited influence - see

215:

Knowledge (XXG); and all edits made under this account may be reverted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may

1247:

Thank you for listening. Apparently the admins here are not inclined to respond to me or discuss, and I sent them private emails and my phone number too.

2622: 2489: 2378: 2267: 2230: 2095: 1984: 1793: 2593: 335:. I am likely among the very few here on Knowledge (XXG) who uses a real name, real ID and openly shows who I am, where I am from and what I do. 1893: 2221: 1756: 1020: 858: 836: 668: 228: 1265:. I have now given you that link - please read it and then review the actual investigation and findings before you respond further. Please. 2654: 2521: 2410: 2299: 2127: 2016: 1825: 1647: 922: 742: 285: 1925: 164: 1946:

This user made edits there-- (diff) 2016-12-28T20:46:04 . . Judae1 (talk | contribs | block) (28,497 bytes) (more refs and cleaned)

967:

I have been an editor for ten years and I do know what is permitted and what is not. This account is not a SockPuppet, it is that if

557:). Some of us are aware that Mr. Torossian is actively soliciting paid editors on Elance - that too needs to be disclosed each time. 182: 787:

I am not have been editing on Wiki for a long time now. Please let me know why? I work in a shared office with hundreds of people

434:

editing that article as far as I know due to his well-declared COI. I reckon blocking him as part of the sockfarm was a mistake.

1693:

involvements, no contact. I have an interest in the article's subject and I researched and studied it. It was no different than

331:

controversial items and have made basic changes, dates and references, to most issues in question. Additionally, I am hardly a

1229:

Anyway, i am just upsetting you and i am not the decision maker. I hope that things work out. sorry again for upsetting you.

664: 216: 211:. If this is a sock puppet account, and your original account is blocked, please also note that banned or blocked users are 2729: 176: 2649: 2516: 2405: 2294: 2122: 2011: 1820: 1642: 917: 737: 381: 365: 280: 2618: 2485: 2374: 2263: 2207: 2091: 1980: 1789: 1620: 1112:

hard, as the CU results are what they are and the associated accounts are obvious throw-away accounts for paid editors.

895: 715: 660: 631: 142: 1614: 889: 709: 257: 1697:, a man I never met, but heard about his plight and went to a rally to see and hear more. Nor is it different from 1619:

Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the

894:

Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the

714:

Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the

62: 651: 646: 638: 198: 194: 149: 1524:

And how is possible that those "independent people" are editing the same article as you, and with similar edits?

1370: 74: 1567: 2225: 2242: 1962: 1929: 1908: 1742: 1005: 170: 1935: 575:. btw, i think it is clear to everybody that the sockmaster is probably Torossian... if so, that would be 2220:

been revoked. If you are able to confirm that you are the user who created this account, please read the

158: 1297: 1531: 1380: 1332: 686: 554: 460:

in urging that this block be repealed. It was imposed within the framework of a ban on all employees of

2213: 1958: 1953:(diff) 2016-12-28T19:40:07 . . Judae1 (talk | contribs | block) (26,430 bytes) (possible enhancements) 2668: 2535: 2424: 2313: 2141: 2030: 1839: 1661: 936: 756: 299: 2199: 2237: 1903: 1897: 1738: 1296:

You are blocked for sockpuppetry, and that is all we should be talking about here. In short: our

1042: 1000: 399: 236: 80: 2711: 2578: 2467: 2356: 2184: 2073: 1882: 1468: 523: 479: 153: 1730: 1226:

but thanks for responding to me and saying how you have operated here with regard to clients.

387: 2645: 2512: 2401: 2290: 2118: 2007: 1816: 1765: 1694: 1590: 1544: 1526: 1497: 1375: 1327: 1270: 1234: 1177: 1121: 1074: 1029: 867: 681: 674: 663:. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may 584: 562: 439: 222: 76: 45: 2596:. I would address the situation to them with complete honesty if you choose to email them. 412: 391: 208: 844: 193:

that was created to violate Knowledge (XXG) policy. Note that using multiple accounts is

1414: 494: 461: 421: 115: 2723: 2602: 1698: 395: 232: 1170:

I have not edited pages of clients. Where I did, I admit it and made correct edits.

1165:

I see you and all the socks editing it directly and no COI disclosures from anybody.

2707: 2574: 2463: 2352: 2180: 2069: 1878: 1702: 1464: 539: 519: 475: 572: 2628: 2495: 2384: 2273: 2101: 1990: 1799: 1707: 1625: 1586: 1571: 1548: 1510: 1502: 1482: 1397: 1352: 1291: 1266: 1248: 1230: 1197: 1192: 1173: 1144: 1139: 1117: 1087: 1083: 1070: 1047: 972: 900: 788: 720: 597: 580: 558: 543: 457: 435: 373: 357: 336: 263: 814:

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Knowledge (XXG),

2592:

I have received your email - and the only advice left to give you would be to

1317: 1305: 1162: 840: 332: 1369:

It's not illegal, but it is certainly against Knowledge (XXG)'s policy (see:

2694: 2561: 2450: 2339: 2167: 2056: 1865: 1737:

and to describe, precisely, your relationship with each of the named users.

550: 489: 453: 416: 411:

That's some disappointing behavior by your peers. Are you familiar with our

111: 2610: 2477: 2366: 2255: 2083: 1972: 1781: 2597: 1172:

Where have you disclosed the clients, on behalf of whom you have edited?

106:

regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is

622: 133: 78: 2699:

was submitted on Jun 15, 2018 04:48:43. This review is now closed.

2566:

was submitted on Feb 13, 2018 22:50:31. This review is now closed.

2455:

was submitted on Jan 09, 2018 15:23:00. This review is now closed.

2344:

was submitted on Dec 25, 2017 17:29:07. This review is now closed.

2172:

was submitted on Dec 18, 2017 15:25:47. This review is now closed.

2061:

was submitted on Dec 14, 2017 22:19:52. This review is now closed.

1870:

was submitted on Aug 30, 2017 16:17:26. This review is now closed.

1106:...I was being part of a firm where a single party was accused of... 2715: 2604: 2582: 2471: 2360: 2247: 2188: 2077: 1966: 1939: 1913: 1886: 1746: 1715: 1594: 1579: 1556: 1537: 1518: 1490: 1472: 1405: 1386: 1360: 1338: 1274: 1256: 1238: 1205: 1181: 1152: 1125: 1095: 1078: 1055: 1010: 980: 848: 796: 692: 605: 588: 566: 527: 501: 483: 443: 428: 403: 240: 119: 1920:

Seems to be a different user being discussed above. This in not

968: 659:, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans 617: 128: 81: 39: 20: 2609: 2476: 2365: 2254: 2198: 2082: 1971: 1780: 1605: 880: 700: 248: 1733:. My advice is to address, point by point, the evidence at 1069:

people at the firm(s), you are caught up in that. Firmly.

1223:

so there is no need for "asserted" kind of discourse here.

370:

to the more certain/likely sockpuppets, I can accept that

1753:

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please

1585:

No that is entirely different. This is not helping you.

1501:

anyone else other the collegial talk in the vestibule.

1017:

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please

855:

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please

2216:. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has 1773:

Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

1735:

Knowledge (XXG):Sockpuppet investigations/Judae1/Archive

1037:

Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

875:

Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

386:

is editing separately in a manner that does not violate

2682: 2678: 2672: 2663: 2659: 2641: 2637: 2633: 2549: 2545: 2539: 2530: 2526: 2508: 2504: 2500: 2438: 2434: 2428: 2419: 2415: 2397: 2393: 2389: 2327: 2323: 2317: 2308: 2304: 2286: 2282: 2278: 2155: 2151: 2145: 2136: 2132: 2114: 2110: 2106: 2044: 2040: 2034: 2025: 2021: 2003: 1999: 1995: 1853: 1849: 1843: 1834: 1830: 1812: 1808: 1804: 1675: 1671: 1665: 1656: 1652: 1638: 1634: 1630: 1313: 1309: 1301: 994: 950: 946: 940: 931: 927: 913: 909: 905: 770: 766: 760: 751: 747: 733: 729: 725: 313: 309: 303: 294: 290: 276: 272: 268: 207:, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban 188: 29: 16: 1892:

This user has said that they are not a sock but these

1413:

It has been several years since I was involved in the

1161:

been doing. And if I look at the editing history of

104:

Knowledge (XXG):Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents

1613:

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an

888:

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an

826:

will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and

708:

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an

390:. That being said, please be aware that any kind of 256:

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an

108:

Ban on Ronn Torossian to be extended to his company?

1481:Thank you for this. I hope my pleas are heard. 1102:I work in a shared office with hundreds of people 643:Knowledge (XXG):Sockpuppet investigations/Judae1 596:Thank you all. I am grateful for your support. 820:the block is no longer necessary because you 28: 8: 2621:is asking that his block be reviewed on the 2488:is asking that his block be reviewed on the 2377:is asking that his block be reviewed on the 2266:is asking that his block be reviewed on the 2094:is asking that his block be reviewed on the 1983:is asking that his block be reviewed on the 1792:is asking that his block be reviewed on the 1933: 1061:I am not an admin, but here is my 2 cents. 823:understand what you have been blocked for, 1896:edits show this editor working with this 1168:Above you wrote the somewhat confusing 829:will make useful contributions instead. 1894:Special:Undelete/User:Draykyle/sandbox 1169: 1105: 1101: 1157:The edits by the socks are pollution. 7: 1300:tool found several accounts (listed 227:below. However, you should read the 2212:because it is suspected that it is 1263:"defending yourself against claims" 102:There is currently a discussion at 645:. Note that multiple accounts are 14: 2594:contact the arbitration committee 2228:), then submit a request to the 621: 132: 97: 44: 1509:) 01:01, 11 August 2017 (UTC) 1: 2623:Unblock Ticket Request System 2583:22:50, 13 February 2018 (UTC) 2490:Unblock Ticket Request System 2379:Unblock Ticket Request System 2361:17:29, 25 December 2017 (UTC) 2268:Unblock Ticket Request System 2248:11:06, 22 December 2017 (UTC) 2231:Unblock Ticket Request System 2189:15:25, 18 December 2017 (UTC) 2096:Unblock Ticket Request System 2078:22:19, 14 December 2017 (UTC) 1985:Unblock Ticket Request System 1967:02:45, 22 December 2017 (UTC) 1794:Unblock Ticket Request System 2472:15:23, 9 January 2018 (UTC) 1940:00:17, 9 October 2017 (UTC) 1914:02:10, 4 October 2017 (UTC) 1887:16:17, 30 August 2017 (UTC) 1747:00:53, 30 August 2017 (UTC) 1716:16:59, 29 August 2017 (UTC) 1617:, who declined the request. 1557:09:01, 11 August 2017 (UTC) 1538:07:59, 11 August 2017 (UTC) 1519:01:01, 11 August 2017 (UTC) 1491:16:24, 10 August 2017 (UTC) 1473:07:10, 10 August 2017 (UTC) 1406:00:36, 11 August 2017 (UTC) 1387:23:05, 10 August 2017 (UTC) 1056:20:00, 15 August 2017 (UTC) 1011:19:00, 14 August 2017 (UTC) 892:, who declined the request. 712:, who declined the request. 260:, who accepted the request. 2746: 1595:21:59, 8 August 2017 (UTC) 1580:21:57, 8 August 2017 (UTC) 1361:17:10, 9 August 2017 (UTC) 1339:15:19, 9 August 2017 (UTC) 1320:article. It is absolutely 1275:22:03, 8 August 2017 (UTC) 1257:21:46, 8 August 2017 (UTC) 1239:20:22, 8 August 2017 (UTC) 1206:19:43, 8 August 2017 (UTC) 1182:19:30, 8 August 2017 (UTC) 1153:19:04, 8 August 2017 (UTC) 1126:18:40, 8 August 2017 (UTC) 1096:18:00, 8 August 2017 (UTC) 1079:15:56, 8 August 2017 (UTC) 981:15:11, 9 August 2017 (UTC) 849:22:54, 7 August 2017 (UTC) 797:22:46, 7 August 2017 (UTC) 693:22:21, 7 August 2017 (UTC) 661:may be reverted or deleted 641:per evidence presented at 209:may be reverted or deleted 2716:04:48, 15 June 2018 (UTC) 2605:23:06, 8 March 2018 (UTC) 2222:guide to appealing blocks 1757:guide to appealing blocks 1021:guide to appealing blocks 859:guide to appealing blocks 837:guide to appealing blocks 669:guide to appealing blocks 549:However, I do agree with 343:) 4:26 am, Today (UTC−7) 229:guide to appealing blocks 1711: 1575: 1568:User_talk:Sundartripathi 1552: 1514: 1506: 1486: 1401: 1356: 1316:both !voted to keep the 1252: 1201: 1148: 1091: 1051: 976: 792: 677:|Your reason here ~~~~}} 614:Blocked for sockpuppetry 606:18:00, 5 June 2015 (UTC) 601: 589:17:22, 5 June 2015 (UTC) 567:17:08, 5 June 2015 (UTC) 528:13:00, 5 June 2015 (UTC) 502:12:44, 5 June 2015 (UTC) 484:12:20, 5 June 2015 (UTC) 444:12:07, 5 June 2015 (UTC) 429:12:03, 5 June 2015 (UTC) 404:17:49, 5 June 2015 (UTC) 340: 241:05:57, 5 June 2015 (UTC) 225:|Your reason here ~~~~}} 120:23:18, 24 May 2015 (UTC) 671:, then adding the text 125:Blocked as a sockpuppet 2614: 2481: 2370: 2259: 2205:Your account has been 2203: 2087: 1976: 1785: 1610: 885: 839:for more information. 705: 630:This account has been 253: 141:This account has been 2669:change block settings 2613: 2536:change block settings 2480: 2425:change block settings 2369: 2314:change block settings 2258: 2202: 2142:change block settings 2086: 2031:change block settings 1975: 1840:change block settings 1784: 1662:change block settings 1609: 937:change block settings 884: 757:change block settings 704: 667:by first reading the 649:, but using them for 555:Yoshiyahu Yosef Pinto 518:Sorry, my mistake. -- 452:I join my colleagues 300:change block settings 252: 197:, but using them for 2730:Compromised accounts 392:conflict of interest 219:by adding the text 213:not allowed to edit 2695:UTRS appeal #21825 2615: 2562:UTRS appeal #20614 2482: 2451:UTRS appeal #20279 2371: 2340:UTRS appeal #20154 2260: 2204: 2168:UTRS appeal #20103 2088: 2057:UTRS appeal #20067 1977: 1866:UTRS appeal #19112 1786: 1708:Juda S. Engelmayer 1611: 1572:Juda S. Engelmayer 1549:Juda S. Engelmayer 1511:Juda S. Engelmayer 1503:Juda S. Engelmayer 1483:Juda S. Engelmayer 1398:Juda S. Engelmayer 1353:Juda S. Engelmayer 1249:Juda S. Engelmayer 1198:Juda S. Engelmayer 1145:Juda S. Engelmayer 1088:Juda S. Engelmayer 1048:Juda S. Engelmayer 973:Juda S. Engelmayer 886: 789:Juda S. Engelmayer 706: 598:Juda S. Engelmayer 337:Juda S. Engelmayer 254: 1942: 698: 697: 665:appeal this block 637:from editing for 246: 245: 217:appeal this block 87: 86: 68: 67: 38: 37: 2737: 2698: 2697: 2688: 2686: 2675: 2660:abuse filter log 2657: 2655:deleted contribs 2600: 2565: 2564: 2555: 2553: 2542: 2527:abuse filter log 2524: 2522:deleted contribs 2454: 2453: 2444: 2442: 2431: 2416:abuse filter log 2413: 2411:deleted contribs 2343: 2342: 2333: 2331: 2320: 2305:abuse filter log 2302: 2300:deleted contribs 2245: 2240: 2171: 2170: 2161: 2159: 2148: 2133:abuse filter log 2130: 2128:deleted contribs 2060: 2059: 2050: 2048: 2037: 2022:abuse filter log 2019: 2017:deleted contribs 1911: 1906: 1869: 1868: 1859: 1857: 1846: 1831:abuse filter log 1828: 1826:deleted contribs 1770: 1764: 1695:Jacob Ostreicher 1681: 1679: 1668: 1650: 1648:deleted contribs 1608: 1545:User:Vanjagenije 1534: 1529: 1498:User:Vanjagenije 1383: 1378: 1335: 1330: 1295: 1100:above you wrote 1034: 1028: 1008: 1003: 956: 954: 943: 925: 923:deleted contribs 883: 872: 866: 835:Please read the 776: 774: 763: 745: 743:deleted contribs 703: 689: 684: 678: 625: 618: 499: 492: 426: 419: 385: 376: 369: 360: 319: 317: 306: 288: 286:deleted contribs 251: 226: 192: 136: 129: 101: 100: 82: 59: 58: 48: 40: 33: 32: 21: 2745: 2744: 2740: 2739: 2738: 2736: 2735: 2734: 2720: 2719: 2704: 2693: 2692: 2676: 2666: 2652: 2631: 2598: 2590: 2571: 2560: 2559: 2543: 2533: 2519: 2498: 2460: 2449: 2448: 2432: 2422: 2408: 2387: 2349: 2338: 2337: 2321: 2311: 2297: 2276: 2250: 2243: 2238: 2196: 2177: 2166: 2165: 2149: 2139: 2125: 2104: 2066: 2055: 2054: 2038: 2028: 2014: 1993: 1950: 1924:user talk page. 1909: 1904: 1875: 1864: 1863: 1847: 1837: 1823: 1802: 1776: 1768: 1762: 1761:, then use the 1750: 1719: 1669: 1659: 1645: 1628: 1621:blocking policy 1606: 1603: 1601:Unblock Request 1564: 1532: 1527: 1381: 1376: 1371:WP:MEATPUPPETRY 1333: 1328: 1308:. For example: 1289: 1287: 1040: 1032: 1026: 1025:, then use the 1014: 1006: 1001: 984: 969:Juda Engelmayer 944: 934: 920: 903: 896:blocking policy 881: 878: 870: 864: 863:, then use the 852: 800: 764: 754: 740: 723: 716:blocking policy 701: 687: 682: 672: 616: 495: 490: 422: 417: 408: 407: 372: 371: 356: 355: 345: 307: 297: 283: 266: 249: 220: 171:global contribs 156: 148:as a suspected 127: 110:. Thank you. 98: 95: 93:AN/I discussion 83: 77: 53: 27: 26:Please leave a 19: 12: 11: 5: 2743: 2741: 2733: 2732: 2722: 2721: 2702: 2690: 2608: 2589: 2586: 2569: 2557: 2475: 2458: 2446: 2364: 2347: 2335: 2253: 2235: 2224:(specifically 2197: 2195: 2192: 2175: 2163: 2081: 2064: 2052: 1970: 1955: 1954: 1948: 1944: 1943: 1938:comment added 1917: 1916: 1901: 1873: 1861: 1779: 1751: 1726: 1722:Decline reason 1690: 1686:Request reason 1683: 1604: 1602: 1599: 1598: 1597: 1563: 1560: 1541: 1540: 1494: 1493: 1478: 1477: 1476: 1475: 1457: 1456: 1455: 1454: 1447: 1446: 1445: 1444: 1432: 1431: 1430: 1429: 1422: 1421: 1420: 1419: 1415:Ronn Torossian 1394: 1392: 1391: 1390: 1389: 1364: 1363: 1347: 1346: 1286: 1283: 1282: 1281: 1280: 1279: 1278: 1277: 1245: 1244: 1243: 1242: 1241: 1227: 1224: 1213: 1212: 1211: 1210: 1209: 1208: 1185: 1184: 1166: 1158: 1155: 1135: 1133: 1132: 1131: 1130: 1129: 1128: 1113: 1066: 1062: 1015: 998: 991: 987:Decline reason 965: 961:Request reason 958: 879: 853: 833: 832: 831: 830: 827: 824: 818: 807: 803:Decline reason 785: 781:Request reason 778: 699: 696: 695: 626: 615: 612: 610: 594: 593: 592: 591: 547: 536: 535: 534: 533: 532: 531: 530: 509: 508: 507: 506: 505: 504: 468: 467: 466: 465: 462:Ronn Torossian 447: 446: 431: 352: 328: 324:Request reason 321: 247: 244: 243: 137: 126: 123: 94: 91: 89: 85: 84: 79: 75: 73: 70: 69: 66: 65: 55: 54: 49: 43: 36: 35: 24: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2742: 2731: 2728: 2727: 2725: 2718: 2717: 2713: 2709: 2703: 2700: 2696: 2689: 2684: 2680: 2674: 2670: 2665: 2661: 2656: 2651: 2647: 2643: 2642:global blocks 2639: 2638:active blocks 2635: 2630: 2625: 2624: 2620: 2612: 2607: 2606: 2603: 2601: 2595: 2587: 2585: 2584: 2580: 2576: 2570: 2567: 2563: 2556: 2551: 2547: 2541: 2537: 2532: 2528: 2523: 2518: 2514: 2510: 2509:global blocks 2506: 2505:active blocks 2502: 2497: 2492: 2491: 2487: 2479: 2474: 2473: 2469: 2465: 2459: 2456: 2452: 2445: 2440: 2436: 2430: 2426: 2421: 2417: 2412: 2407: 2403: 2399: 2398:global blocks 2395: 2394:active blocks 2391: 2386: 2381: 2380: 2376: 2368: 2363: 2362: 2358: 2354: 2348: 2345: 2341: 2334: 2329: 2325: 2319: 2315: 2310: 2306: 2301: 2296: 2292: 2288: 2287:global blocks 2284: 2283:active blocks 2280: 2275: 2270: 2269: 2265: 2257: 2252: 2249: 2246: 2241: 2239:Berean Hunter 2233: 2232: 2227: 2223: 2219: 2215: 2211: 2209: 2201: 2194:December 2017 2193: 2191: 2190: 2186: 2182: 2176: 2173: 2169: 2162: 2157: 2153: 2147: 2143: 2138: 2134: 2129: 2124: 2120: 2116: 2115:global blocks 2112: 2111:active blocks 2108: 2103: 2098: 2097: 2093: 2085: 2080: 2079: 2075: 2071: 2065: 2062: 2058: 2051: 2046: 2042: 2036: 2032: 2027: 2023: 2018: 2013: 2009: 2005: 2004:global blocks 2001: 2000:active blocks 1997: 1992: 1987: 1986: 1982: 1974: 1969: 1968: 1964: 1960: 1952: 1951: 1947: 1941: 1937: 1931: 1927: 1923: 1919: 1918: 1915: 1912: 1907: 1905:Berean Hunter 1899: 1898:piece of work 1895: 1891: 1890: 1889: 1888: 1884: 1880: 1874: 1871: 1867: 1860: 1855: 1851: 1845: 1841: 1836: 1832: 1827: 1822: 1818: 1814: 1813:global blocks 1810: 1809:active blocks 1806: 1801: 1796: 1795: 1791: 1783: 1778: 1775: 1774: 1767: 1760: 1758: 1749: 1748: 1744: 1740: 1739:Just Chilling 1736: 1732: 1725: 1723: 1718: 1717: 1713: 1709: 1704: 1700: 1699:Kenneth Kraus 1696: 1689: 1687: 1682: 1677: 1673: 1667: 1663: 1658: 1654: 1649: 1644: 1640: 1639:global blocks 1636: 1635:active blocks 1632: 1627: 1622: 1618: 1616: 1615:administrator 1600: 1596: 1592: 1588: 1584: 1583: 1582: 1581: 1577: 1573: 1569: 1561: 1559: 1558: 1554: 1550: 1546: 1539: 1536: 1535: 1530: 1523: 1522: 1521: 1520: 1516: 1512: 1508: 1504: 1499: 1492: 1488: 1484: 1480: 1479: 1474: 1470: 1466: 1461: 1460: 1459: 1458: 1451: 1450: 1449: 1448: 1441: 1436: 1435: 1434: 1433: 1426: 1425: 1424: 1423: 1416: 1412: 1411: 1410: 1409: 1408: 1407: 1403: 1399: 1388: 1385: 1384: 1379: 1372: 1368: 1367: 1366: 1365: 1362: 1358: 1354: 1349: 1348: 1343: 1342: 1341: 1340: 1337: 1336: 1331: 1323: 1319: 1315: 1311: 1307: 1303: 1299: 1293: 1284: 1276: 1272: 1268: 1264: 1260: 1259: 1258: 1254: 1250: 1246: 1240: 1236: 1232: 1228: 1225: 1221: 1220: 1219: 1218: 1217: 1216: 1215: 1214: 1207: 1203: 1199: 1194: 1191: 1190: 1189: 1188: 1187: 1186: 1183: 1179: 1175: 1171: 1167: 1164: 1159: 1156: 1154: 1150: 1146: 1141: 1138: 1137: 1136: 1127: 1123: 1119: 1114: 1111: 1107: 1103: 1099: 1098: 1097: 1093: 1089: 1085: 1082: 1081: 1080: 1076: 1072: 1067: 1063: 1060: 1059: 1058: 1057: 1053: 1049: 1044: 1043:Berean Hunter 1039: 1038: 1031: 1024: 1022: 1013: 1012: 1009: 1004: 1002:Berean Hunter 996: 990: 988: 983: 982: 978: 974: 970: 964: 962: 957: 952: 948: 942: 938: 933: 929: 924: 919: 915: 914:global blocks 911: 910:active blocks 907: 902: 897: 893: 891: 890:administrator 877: 876: 869: 862: 860: 851: 850: 846: 842: 838: 828: 825: 822: 821: 819: 817: 813: 812: 811: 806: 804: 799: 798: 794: 790: 784: 782: 777: 772: 768: 762: 758: 753: 749: 744: 739: 735: 734:global blocks 731: 730:active blocks 727: 722: 717: 713: 711: 710:administrator 694: 691: 690: 685: 676: 670: 666: 662: 658: 654: 653: 648: 644: 640: 639:sock puppetry 636: 635: 633: 627: 624: 620: 619: 613: 611: 608: 607: 603: 599: 590: 586: 582: 578: 574: 570: 569: 568: 564: 560: 556: 552: 548: 545: 541: 538:I agree with 537: 529: 525: 521: 517: 516: 515: 514: 513: 512: 511: 510: 503: 500: 498: 493: 487: 486: 485: 481: 477: 472: 471: 470: 469: 463: 459: 455: 451: 450: 449: 448: 445: 441: 437: 432: 430: 427: 425: 420: 414: 410: 409: 406: 405: 401: 397: 393: 389: 383: 380: 375: 367: 364: 359: 351: 349: 348:Accept reason 344: 342: 338: 334: 327: 325: 320: 315: 311: 305: 301: 296: 292: 287: 282: 278: 277:global blocks 274: 273:active blocks 270: 265: 261: 259: 258:administrator 242: 238: 234: 230: 224: 218: 214: 210: 206: 202: 201: 196: 190: 187: 184: 183:user creation 181: 178: 175: 172: 169: 166: 163: 160: 155: 151: 147: 146: 144: 138: 135: 131: 130: 124: 122: 121: 117: 113: 109: 105: 92: 90: 72: 71: 64: 61: 60: 57: 56: 52: 47: 42: 41: 31: 25: 23: 22: 18: 2705: 2701: 2691: 2664:creation log 2627: 2619:blocked user 2616: 2591: 2572: 2568: 2558: 2531:creation log 2494: 2486:blocked user 2483: 2461: 2457: 2447: 2420:creation log 2383: 2375:blocked user 2372: 2350: 2346: 2336: 2309:creation log 2272: 2264:blocked user 2261: 2251: 2229: 2226:this section 2217: 2210:indefinitely 2206: 2178: 2174: 2164: 2137:creation log 2100: 2092:blocked user 2089: 2067: 2063: 2053: 2026:creation log 1989: 1981:blocked user 1978: 1959:Dlohcierekim 1957:cheers, -- 1956: 1945: 1926:70.208.71.89 1921: 1876: 1872: 1862: 1835:creation log 1798: 1790:blocked user 1787: 1777: 1772: 1754: 1752: 1727: 1721: 1720: 1691: 1685: 1684: 1657:creation log 1624: 1612: 1565: 1542: 1525: 1495: 1439: 1393: 1374: 1326: 1321: 1298:WP:Checkuser 1288: 1285:Sockpuppetry 1134: 1109: 1041: 1036: 1018: 1016: 992: 986: 985: 966: 960: 959: 932:creation log 899: 887: 874: 856: 854: 834: 815: 808: 802: 801: 786: 780: 779: 752:creation log 719: 707: 680: 656: 652:illegitimate 650: 634:indefinitely 629: 628: 609: 595: 576: 496: 423: 413:terms of use 378: 362: 353: 347: 346: 329: 323: 322: 295:creation log 262: 255: 212: 204: 200:illegitimate 199: 185: 179: 173: 167: 161: 154:Babasalichai 145:indefinitely 140: 139: 96: 88: 50: 2214:compromised 1934:—Preceding 1562:Due Process 1528:Vanjagenije 1440:prima facie 1418:exonerated. 1377:Vanjagenije 1329:Vanjagenije 1104:as well as 683:Vanjagenije 150:sock puppet 30:new message 2646:autoblocks 2588:Your email 2513:autoblocks 2402:autoblocks 2291:autoblocks 2119:autoblocks 2008:autoblocks 1922:Draykyle's 1817:autoblocks 1653:filter log 1318:Jason Binn 1306:Jason Binn 1163:Jason Binn 928:filter log 748:filter log 333:sockpuppet 291:filter log 177:page moves 2679:checkuser 2634:block log 2546:checkuser 2501:block log 2435:checkuser 2390:block log 2324:checkuser 2279:block log 2152:checkuser 2107:block log 2041:checkuser 1996:block log 1850:checkuser 1805:block log 1755:read the 1672:checkuser 1631:block log 1443:possible. 1019:read the 947:checkuser 906:block log 857:read the 767:checkuser 726:block log 579:. right? 310:checkuser 269:block log 189:block log 63:Archive 1 2724:Category 2650:contribs 2517:contribs 2406:contribs 2295:contribs 2123:contribs 2012:contribs 1821:contribs 1643:contribs 1314:ChasTayn 918:contribs 738:contribs 655:reasons 577:his boss 396:Darkwind 281:contribs 233:Darkwind 231:first. — 203:reasons 165:contribs 51:Archives 2708:UTRSBot 2673:unblock 2575:UTRSBot 2540:unblock 2464:UTRSBot 2429:unblock 2353:UTRSBot 2318:unblock 2208:blocked 2181:UTRSBot 2146:unblock 2070:UTRSBot 2035:unblock 1936:undated 1879:UTRSBot 1844:unblock 1766:unblock 1731:WP:UTRS 1666:unblock 1465:Ravpapa 1030:unblock 941:unblock 868:unblock 761:unblock 679:below. 675:unblock 647:allowed 632:blocked 540:Ravpapa 520:Ravpapa 476:Ravpapa 388:WP:SOCK 304:unblock 223:unblock 195:allowed 143:blocked 2629:Judae1 2496:Judae1 2385:Judae1 2274:Judae1 2244:(talk) 2102:Judae1 1991:Judae1 1910:(talk) 1800:Judae1 1626:Judae1 1587:Jytdog 1533:(talk) 1453:order. 1382:(talk) 1334:(talk) 1292:Judae1 1267:Jytdog 1231:Jytdog 1193:Jytdog 1174:Jytdog 1140:Jytdog 1118:Jytdog 1084:Jytdog 1071:Jytdog 1007:(talk) 901:Judae1 721:Judae1 688:(talk) 657:is not 581:Jytdog 559:Mosmof 544:Jytdog 497:(talk) 458:Jytdog 436:Jytdog 424:(talk) 374:Judae1 358:Judae1 264:Judae1 205:is not 2617:This 2484:This 2373:This 2262:This 2090:This 1979:This 1788:This 1759:first 1566:This 1543:Dear 1496:Dear 1428:5WPR. 1023:first 861:first 841:Yamla 2712:talk 2579:talk 2468:talk 2357:talk 2218:also 2185:talk 2074:talk 1963:talk 1930:talk 1883:talk 1743:talk 1712:talk 1703:page 1591:talk 1576:talk 1553:talk 1515:talk 1507:talk 1487:talk 1469:talk 1402:talk 1357:talk 1312:and 1302:here 1271:talk 1253:talk 1235:talk 1202:talk 1178:talk 1149:talk 1122:talk 1092:talk 1075:talk 1052:talk 995:here 977:talk 845:talk 793:talk 602:talk 585:talk 573:here 563:talk 551:Kuru 542:and 524:talk 491:Kuru 480:talk 456:and 454:Kuru 440:talk 418:Kuru 400:talk 341:talk 237:talk 159:talk 116:talk 112:Huon 17:logs 2683:log 2599:SQL 2550:log 2439:log 2328:log 2156:log 2045:log 1932:) 1854:log 1676:log 1623:). 1322:not 1310:You 951:log 898:). 771:log 718:). 314:log 152:of 2726:: 2714:) 2706:-- 2687:) 2677:• 2671:• 2667:• 2662:• 2658:• 2653:• 2648:• 2644:• 2640:• 2636:• 2626:: 2581:) 2573:-- 2554:) 2544:• 2538:• 2534:• 2529:• 2525:• 2520:• 2515:• 2511:• 2507:• 2503:• 2493:: 2470:) 2462:-- 2443:) 2433:• 2427:• 2423:• 2418:• 2414:• 2409:• 2404:• 2400:• 2396:• 2392:• 2382:: 2359:) 2351:-- 2332:) 2322:• 2316:• 2312:• 2307:• 2303:• 2298:• 2293:• 2289:• 2285:• 2281:• 2271:: 2236:— 2187:) 2179:-- 2160:) 2150:• 2144:• 2140:• 2135:• 2131:• 2126:• 2121:• 2117:• 2113:• 2109:• 2099:: 2076:) 2068:-- 2049:) 2039:• 2033:• 2029:• 2024:• 2020:• 2015:• 2010:• 2006:• 2002:• 1998:• 1988:: 1965:) 1902:— 1885:) 1877:-- 1858:) 1848:• 1842:• 1838:• 1833:• 1829:• 1824:• 1819:• 1815:• 1811:• 1807:• 1797:: 1769:}} 1763:{{ 1745:) 1724:: 1714:) 1688:: 1670:• 1664:• 1660:• 1655:• 1651:• 1646:• 1641:• 1637:• 1633:• 1593:) 1578:) 1555:) 1517:) 1489:) 1471:) 1404:) 1359:) 1273:) 1255:) 1237:) 1204:) 1180:) 1151:) 1124:) 1110:is 1094:) 1077:) 1054:) 1033:}} 1027:{{ 999:— 989:: 979:) 963:: 945:• 939:• 935:• 930:• 926:• 921:• 916:• 912:• 908:• 871:}} 865:{{ 847:) 816:or 805:: 795:) 783:: 765:• 759:• 755:• 750:• 746:• 741:• 736:• 732:• 728:• 673:{{ 604:) 587:) 565:) 526:) 482:) 474:-- 442:) 402:) 350:: 326:: 308:• 302:• 298:• 293:• 289:• 284:• 279:• 275:• 271:• 239:) 221:{{ 118:) 2710:( 2685:) 2681:( 2632:( 2577:( 2552:) 2548:( 2499:( 2466:( 2441:) 2437:( 2388:( 2355:( 2330:) 2326:( 2277:( 2234:. 2183:( 2158:) 2154:( 2105:( 2072:( 2047:) 2043:( 1994:( 1961:( 1928:( 1881:( 1856:) 1852:( 1803:( 1741:( 1710:( 1680:) 1678:) 1674:( 1629:( 1589:( 1574:( 1551:( 1513:( 1505:( 1485:( 1467:( 1400:( 1355:( 1294:: 1290:@ 1269:( 1251:( 1233:( 1200:( 1176:( 1147:( 1120:( 1090:( 1073:( 1050:( 975:( 955:) 953:) 949:( 904:( 843:( 791:( 775:) 773:) 769:( 724:( 600:( 583:( 561:( 522:( 478:( 438:( 398:( 384:) 382:c 379:t 377:( 368:) 366:c 363:t 361:( 339:( 318:) 316:) 312:( 267:( 235:( 191:) 186:· 180:· 174:· 168:· 162:· 157:( 114:( 34:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index