User talk:Julia W/Archive 8

3544:

account has been blocked so the info I posted on the articles for deletion for an administrator were deleted. They deleted my statement that I didn't Sockpuppet. The Nom knew she had no WP Guidelines from the beginning to have the page deleted. Please if you verify when I created the page I met all of the guidelines from day one. Why therefore would I need to be a Sockpuppet. During the deletion process only the Nom and I voted. So how was a Sockpuppet used in the Articles for deletion page. I never received any notice that there was a problem with the page. Again, why would I need to Sockpuppet. It only takes one person to create a page so why would I need other people when I provided all of the verifiable and reliable references at the bottom of the page.

3633: 3338: 2759: 1319:"Primarily concerned with the content of the encyclopaedia—that means I write, and fix stuff, and make things more accurate, and such. Not at all concerned with behavioural issues, combatant natures, ancient blocks, old grievances, drama, etc." Yeah, I used to be that way too. I created articles on important stuff, several of which are the top Google result. I never mucked with the drama stuff until sucked against my will into it. I'd say thanks for looking, but you seem to have just copped an instant judgement, and one that doesn't fit me at all. 1250:

Rowe (declined on basis "too complex, I don't have enough time." That's the Js, but there have been by now I guess twelve or thirteen individual administrators in all I've asked like this, of which probably four didn't respond at all, most of the rest answered with little discussion like January and Josiah, one said basically "I think you deserve to be blocked," and one (Nihonjoe) unblocked with substantial research and policy references, but was battled back, frankly, by a WP:AN/ANI mob that took it on itself to vote me off the island.

1086: 1541: 3787:

nominations already includes a parameter for linking directly to the correct nomination page. In this instance, I deleted the redirect because I edited the file page on Commons to link to the correct nomination page – making the redirect not useful. I think the case of a user knowing the file name and wanting to find the nomination page by using the address bar is minuscule and doesn't justify the creation of thousands and thousands of otherwise unnecessary redirects. Does this make sense? Thanks for asking! :)

2634: 1149: 3049: 873: 1589: 3856: 3724: 31: 2122:

pretty big and old looking porch - is different. Window placement is the same (except in area covered by the porch), pilasters are missing, chimney placement looks the same, except the chimneys themselves look a bit smaller. The roof must have been replaced. So it could go either way, but I usually go with the structure rather than the ornamentation. If you know the real house, why not just go and get the real pic? Any help appreciated!

2958: 2600:, there was one main contributor to the article and the rest of the edits were minor and inconsequential. I don't think this new draft is a copyright infringement of the original. It certainly isn't written as well. There were some issues with the author of the original; she claims she was coerced into writing the article and including falsehoods. I don't believe she wants to be credited anyway if this new draft gets approved. 744:? You don't need to know anything about Allie; I'm contacting you because you've worked on Featured Pictures. I tried contacting lots of editors who work on comics-related articles, but every time I do so, we wind up with the sentiments split down the middle, and no clear consensus. I'm thinking perhaps that people who work on matters dealing with photography might be able to offer viewpoints that yield a consensus. Thank you. 2419: 3423: 3140: 2480: 1691: 1436: 1004: 511: 907: 406: 3029: 2075: 1882:

necessarily a FP by 2014 standards so for the time being I haven't nominated it to replace the current FP (not to mention it's only just been added to articles and as per due process, I'll wait and see if it 'sticks'). But as the current FP is no longer used in any articles, it's an automatic delist nomination. Anyway, just wanted to make you aware so you can make your opinions felt.

2910: 655: 1639: 3681: 3379: 1808: 602: 2166:

house is because the house numbering on that road used to be different. The National Register of Historic Places gives the address for Ashlawn as 1 Potash Hill Road – but, of course, the record is old and out of date. That address used to exist further down Potash Hill Road, at the junction of Potash Hill Road and Westminster Road. That

1254:

been forthright and straight-up. This account is my second, I switched for privacy concerns. This is the no-fault basis under WP:CLEANSTART, which is policy. I'd edited Knowledge (XXG) for years, created several articles, and in-depth contributed to many more. Those were mainly under my previous account but I can at least point you to

2705: 2603:

I recommend declining the draft in any case because notability is still not established. The subject doesn't meet the general criteria of sportsmen notability, and the "impressive list" of world-class competitions are all in the senior division and therefore typically disregarded, as far as I know.

2174:

original record of the NRHP states the house "sits in the fork of Potash Hill and Water Roads..." (on the second page). At first this seems to contradict what the article says, except that if you look further north on Westminster Road, Google Maps shows a name change to Water Street. Here is one of

3686:

wikimedia.org). Again, please sign this confidentiality agreement by 15 December 2015 (OTRS users have until 31 December 2015) to retain your access to nonpublic information. If you do not wish to retain this access, please let me know and we will forward your request to the appropriate individuals.

3591:

My comments saying I don't have more than one user name has been deleted has also removed comments I posted defending myself against these allegations. Every attempt by Missvain has been made to delete the Larissa Dubois pages. Blocking my talk and edit prevens me from defending myself and providing

3543:

Please look at the page for Larissa Dubois to review. You will clearly see that there was no reason for me to Sockpuppet the page. The Nom had no WP:Musician guideline when she requested for the page to be deleted. I tried to ask for help from an administrator before Nom said I was a Sockpuppet. My

3384:

wikimedia.org). Again, please sign this confidentiality agreement by 15 December 2015 (OTRS users have until 22 December 2015) to retain your access to nonpublic information. If you do not wish to retain this access, please let me know and we will forward your request to the appropriate individuals.

2165:

Hi Smallbones, the picture is definitely wrong. I'll explain why, but be patient, it's a long story! So, the picture that's been re-added, that I previously removed, is of 1 Potash Hill Road. Google Street View for that address confirms it. The reason why so many people think this is the correct

1881:

that I created. It's for the Fulvous Whistling Duck image that you nominated a while back for FP. I took a photo recently that I think improves on it in a number of respects (except cuteness, potentially) and have replaced it in the articles that it previously lived. I'm not sure whether my image is

1803:

Hi Pat, I heartily approve of events that aren't on weekdays! I could have attended this as it's on a Sunday but I've actually now moved to San Francisco, as of last week. I know - big change! Will possibly be back in a few years and then I can once again come to events and meet-ups. Until then,

1253:

I was blocked in May 2012 by Timotheus Canens without warning, diff, or explanation. He just clicked his Twinkle button which generated a pointer to WP:SOCK. The pointer actually said "WP:Sockpuppetry: illegit" or something like that. I never socked Knowledge (XXG). Sock means deception, I've always

1224:

That's correct. But the freedom of panorama embargo applies only to copyrightable works or buildings. Hence why one can publish photos of the Eiffel Tower, but not of the Eiffel Tower when it is lit up at night because the "lighting display" is copyrightable. One may publish a photo of The Louvre

763:

Hey Julie, hope all is well. Could you check your email? There's a thread titled "Oldham Library wiki training" and it would be handy to know if you still planned to come. You've no obligation either way, but it would be great if you could let us know. If I don't see you there, hopefully we'll catch

3786:

Hi SSTflyer, while the redirect isn't implausible as R3 states, this is the closest fitting qualification I could use. As far as I know, the only situation for which this kind of redirect is useful is for links from the Commons file page to the nomination page here. But that template on Commons for

3508:

Hello! I'm running a survey to identify the best way to notify Wikimedians about upcoming UK wikimeets (informal, in-person social meetings of Wikimedians), and to see if we can improve UK wikimeets to make them accessible and attractive to more editors and readers. All questions are optional, and

2382:

unreferenced, it needs to be tagged, but it's usually best to let it mature for a few hours. Obviously your intentions were noble, but rapid deletion tagging is one of the things we all-too-often hear puts people off contributing to Knowledge (XXG). We get emotionally attached to our work—it's huan

2121:

You removed a pic from this article. Someone else sent a pic of the same house and I'm trying to figure out if it's the real house. If you check the external link in the article labeled "Day" you'll see a newspaper pic from 2002. The structure is remarkably similar, the ornamentation - including a

3661:

The Wikimedia Foundation is requiring that anyone with access to nonpublic information sign the new confidentiality agreement by 15 December 2015 (OTRS users have until 31 December 2015) to retain their access. You are receiving this message because you have access to nonpublic information and are

3567:

Again, this article has been targeted (vandalized) by Missvain and her actions by not reading the article before submitting for deletion and the fact that she started an investigation against me without giving the proper notice so that I could defend myself before my account was blocked is wrong.

1783:

Hi Julia! It seems a long time now since the training the trainers event back in Manchester. How are you? Just wanted to let you know that we're having an edit-a-thon here in York on March 16th and it would be great to have you along as an experienced editor and to help with some training? You can

1264:

Well, I don't want to type an intimidatingly long block of text at your page. I guess you will be the last "J" I approach. If you are willing to examine my case, please unblock me at my talkpage, and ask me anything, or point me to your concerns. I promise to mind civility (WP:CIV) policy, which I

1249:

Hi Julia W, I'm looking for an administrator willing to consider a policy-based rationale to overturn my permanent block. I come to you pretty randomly. I decided this morning to ask an administrator beginning with "J." I went through January (declined on basis "WP:BASC said no," etc.) and Josiah

3359:

The Wikimedia Foundation is requiring that anyone with access to nonpublic information sign the new confidentiality agreement by 15 December 2015 (OTRS users have until 22 December 2015) to retain their access. You are receiving this email because you have access to nonpublic information and are

1300:

As disappointing as my response will be, I'm an admin who is primarily concerned with the content of the encyclopaedia—that means I write, and fix stuff, and make things more accurate, and such. I'm not at all concerned with behavioural issues, combatant natures, ancient blocks, old grievances,

3363:

Signing the confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information is conducted and tracked using Legalpad on Phabricator. The general confidentiality agreement is now ready, and the OTRS agreement will be ready after 22 September 2015. We have prepared a guide on Meta-Wiki to help you create your

620:

I can't believe you shot through 25 DYKs and no one thought to give you this medal. Congratulations on all the hard work you've put into creating new content for the encyclopedia. Without people like you doing the proper work, the encyclopedia would be nothing. With you, it gives information to

2773:

The Mary Wollstonecraft Award is awarded to contributors who have helped improve the coverage of women writers and their work on Knowledge (XXG) through content contributions, outreach, community changes and related actions. In particular, thank you for your efforts with the

1265:

acknowledged was a weakness of mine. I need an administrator who is inclined towards policy thought and reasoned justification, as opposed to hierarchical and authority-based thinking. I have to sign my username funny for technical reasons. Thank you in advance for reading.

209: 3831:

Speedy deleting this was not incorrect. It did not require a discussion or consensus. I will continue to speedy delete any more that I come across. You can try to convince another admin to restore it for you, but you'll need better reasons than what you gave me.

1399:

Awesome. Thanks for the reply. Also, I notice there are are a list of numbers under the existing references, that don't appear in the edit screen, and aren't related to any actual references. Is there something I need to do to correct that? Thanks for your

1955:

Hi there. Thanks for signing up for the WikiWomen's Edit-a-Thon at Berkeley that is happening today. I look forward to seeing you! We have changed the on-campus venue due to the response we've had, via Knowledge (XXG) and Facebook. Please take a look at the

3403: 3330: 3318: 1878: 683:

and apparently the architect of the two manors is the same - his name was Emil Julius Strauss. There's also a third manor in Estonia that he possibly designed... OK, a bit of superfluous knowledge perhaps, but still I thought I'd let you know :)

3551:

The page Larissa Dubois has been targeted by for Missvain from the moment that she submitted the page of Articles for deletion. She ignored Knowledge (XXG) guidelines for submitting the deletion, because she had no valid basis to submit it.

1788:. Hopefully there will be some material to interest you - we have some cracking entomology collections! The Backhouse dynasty seem to have been really important curators too. I hope you can come or to see you at an event soon if not. Cheers, 3771:? This redirect is useful for editors who know the image filename and want to look at the nomination page. Many templates also automatically generate this link, especially those on other Knowledge (XXG) versions. Why should this be deleted? 215:

Hi Julie, the Training the Trainers event (weekend of 23-24 February) has been moved to Manchester by popular consent. It would be a great chance for you to brush up your training skills and meet some other awesome Wikimedians. Sign up at

3595:

If you are able to read the comments I wrote before I was blocked. Why would me explanation be blocked during an article for deletion. By placing that under comments it makes me look bad. Why would my comment left for a closing

3348:

on 25 April 2014 after a community consultation. The former policy has remained in place until the new policy could be implemented. That implementation work is now being done, and we are beginning the transition to the new policy.

3665:

Signing the confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information is conducted and tracked using Legalpad on Phabricator. We have prepared a guide on Meta-Wiki to help you create your Phabricator account and sign the new agreement:

2580:(speedy deleted by you) was, and if any others edited it substantively? It has returned in draft space, so I need the authors for attribution. If the history is complex, then fun-with-histmerging may be required... Thanks, 3708: 3625: 3613: 3365: 288:

Thanks. As 18 people have registered their interest and there's only space for 12 we're in the process of chasing up who can come and who would need accommodation (arranged by Wikimedia UK). Would you need accommodation?

3650:

3234:

My dummy edit is now complete.. I split the timeline and graphs from the main tables to single page to reduce the Ebola virus epidemic in West Africa article as have been discussed in the past way back. WP:Bold split

1852:

Actually, it's all Dan's fault. ;) He is working for the Foundation now and so I've moved also. I'm turning my attention to full-time study and part-time work (instead of doing it the other way around as I was!).

678:

Hi! Since you wrote Kuremaa and seem interested, I thought I'd tell you I recently found out who the architect of the manor house was (in case you don't already know). I was looking for info about Suure-Kõpu manor in

3547:

Nom had no one in the community requesting that the page be deleted except for her. She knew the page met the guidelines. I'm not ok with being called a Sockpuppet to remove a page, when that allegation is false.

699:

Hello, thanks for sharing that, I didn't know who the architect was. I've added him to the article now - presumably the source is the book by Ivar Sakk? Shall I add that as a citation or would you like to?

2347:

It's okay, sorry for snapping at you and thanks for the apology. I tend to leave references to later and don't usually write biographies, so it wasn't a good combination! But being templated sucks. :)

3353: 3662:

required to sign the confidentiality agreement under the new policy. If you do not sign the new confidentiality agreement by 15 December 2015, you will lose your access to nonpublic information.

2303:

I think it would have been worth noting that a) I stated in the first edit summary that I was expanding the article and that b) I have written several articles, none of them without references.

1359:

Actually, I haven't made an instant judgement. Some of what I said probably applies to the other admins involved, and is not about you. All I really know is that I don't want to get involved.

3712: 3673: 3407: 3371: 2378:: Slapping a template on an article 15 minutes after it's created isn't especially helpful—unless it's an attack page, spam, or a copyright violation (CSD G10, G11 and G12). Of course, if a BLP 974: 2824:

Hello Julia. I have serious problems here on the English Knowledge (XXG). Could you please listen to my problems? I would appreciate that if you would help me. Please write me on my talk page.

1830:

Wow! Big move - I hope you're enjoying it! Are you still in academia or working for the Foundation? If we get specimen photos up I'll point them your way and hope that they're useful! Cheers,

3055: 1225:

that includes the glass pyramids because they are unavoidable in order to capture the building, but one may not publish a photo of the pyramids themselves. There is more information here:

2053:, but I can't see where the main author requested deletion. I was going to restore it but figured I'd let you weigh in since I'm not really all that familiar with notability for athletes. 3174: 3667: 2002: 2325:

have references, and I was justified thinking it should be tagged. Please use {{under construction}} in the future to make other editors aware. Sorry again for the inconvenience. ~

3585:

for his help and I want to make this known because I don’t want her to make another accusation meatstacking (I don't know if that's the right word. Never did I ask for his vote.

3000: 2720: 1129:

Newsflash! The location of this weekend's Manchester meetup has been moved back to Wetherspoons on Princess Street - the Ducie Arms isn't open on Sundays! Can you believe that?!

1041: 1481: 3345: 3284:

not at all.. A little pun from me, partly because i have been maintaining most of the numbers since the outbreak started....Thanks and have a great day.. Kind Regards Brian

1530: 622: 3457: 3658:. All Wikimedia volunteers with access to nonpublic information are required to sign this new agreement, and we have prepared some documentation to help you do so. 3356:. All Wikimedia volunteers with access to nonpublic information are required to sign this new agreement, and we have prepared some documentation to help you do so. 1193: 1099: 3764: 2435:

has made me a much more efficient editor and has made me more effective and I've had more fun editing. Thank you for your act of kindness. Keep up the good work.

1559: 550: 1960:. If you get this message too late, we'll have a sign on the door of the former location directing you to the new one, which is only a short walk. See you then! 1628: 3655: 3640: 1592: 1152: 3399: 1381:

Thank you. I am new to editing. Can you please provide more detailed information on where the problematic brackets are, & how to fix the syntax issue.

1739: 890: 3727: 1089: 3480:

if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the

3197:

if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the

2542:

if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the

255:

Hi Julia, we're looking to finalise numbers and I just wanted to confirm that you're still interested in attending the event on 23-24th February? Thanks,

3561:

Missvain accused me of being Sophia49 when I am not. I use a publicly shared IP address. We are not one in the same. I am not CandyCanebaby either.

2271: 1785: 804: 1162: 238:

The train the trainers course is excellent. I went on it and learnt a lot. And a lot of it is applicable in many areas of life. I recommend it highly.

2078: 490: 2961: 1666: 1649: 1568: 1564: 794: 194: 101: 3184: 2775: 118: 366: 217: 2732:'s annual literature festival. Your content contributions and community collaboration helped make the event a success, and are appreciated! 1285: 788: 139: 3477: 3194: 2539: 2046: 465:

You should know that you have inspired me to use wikipedia as a creative outlet for my overworked, mid-range and under-challenged brain.

3737: 3326: 1602: 1342: 3643:

by 15 December 2015 (OTRS users have until 31 December 2015) in order to maintain your access from Wikimedia to nonpublic information.

3467: 3115:

Thank you, Eric! I'm sorry I was teaching you to suck eggs in my Flickr mail, I had no idea you were an editor here and on Commons. :)

171: 3647: 2971: 1957: 337:

Thanks again. We'll soon be posting details of the venue and how to get there on the event page. I'll let you know when that's done.

1812:

Shame to miss out on the entomology collection, and would have been great to work with you again too. And thanks for inviting me!

2529: 2006: 1213: 2321:

Sorry for the misunderstanding on my part. I didn't read the edit summary. Although if you look at it technically, your article

448: 395: 374: 342: 294: 260: 2975: 2234:

Sorry, I been out doing some historical work as of late so I haven't been on wiki as much, but indeed - Julia W has it right.

2092: 1606: 1166: 1103: 808: 3217: 2937:

Thank you, and no problem! You didn't do the wrong thing, it was just a bit incomplete perhaps. :) I'll send you an email.

1758:

if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the

1520: 1500:

if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the

1060:

if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the

569:

if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the

2256: 1656: 1261:

It is true that I am "block evading" right now by raw IP editing with username signature, but I feel I have no alternative.

3632: 3337: 3740:

is scheduled to be Picture of the Day on January 10, 2016. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at

3564:

I have one account and that account is Gypsy Diva. I don’t have my own Wi-Fi so I use School, Starbucks, Library, etc.

3429: 3146: 2486: 2017:

Hi Faye, I have received your email and I'm looking into the issue. Sorry for not responding sooner, I have been away.

1697: 1551: 1442: 1010: 517: 121:, and support the mission of free knowledge. We recently updated our website, created new volunteer positions, and more! 3701: 1255: 486: 169:

Volunteer to write for our blog, recruit blog writers, translate content, and co-run our Facebook and receive perks for

2869:

personally identifying material from your talk page, at the request of another user. It's nothing to worry about! :)

2432: 3894: 3889: 3884: 69: 64: 59: 2275: 1665:, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at 3038:, an article you either created or significantly contributed to, has been nominated to appear on Knowledge (XXG)'s 2143:

Well, maybe not, if Google Streetview is up-to-date. But I can't find anything else on that road that is similar.

3863: 3481: 3463: 3198: 3180: 2543: 2525: 1759: 1745: 1501: 1487: 1061: 1047: 636: 570: 556: 444: 391: 370: 338: 290: 256: 38: 2758: 2809: 2088: 925: 424: 130: 1768: 1567:, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at 1226: 1070: 980:

Brilliant, great work. I think people are often inclined to forget about the articles at FPC, which is a shame.

611: 3741: 3035: 2979: 2239: 2096: 1610: 1170: 1107: 812: 3609:

I'm not able to sign my name on here, but I can provide you proof that I am GypsyDiva if requested to do so.

3572: 1289: 951: 1346: 482: 2517: 2441: 1717: 1085: 3558:

Missvain started a Sockpuppet investigation against me without notifying me so that I could defend myself.

2455:

Aww, thank you very much! I'm delighted I could help and I think the bird project is glad you could too!

1998: 1540: 1415: 1338: 1281: 478: 3422: 3167: 3158: 3139: 2829: 2729: 2479: 1965: 1941: 1927: 1913: 1690: 1435: 1003: 510: 3749: 3434: 3151: 3044: 2987: 2633: 2561: 2491: 2392: 2330: 2293: 2282: 2104: 2057: 1702: 1618: 1447: 1178: 1115: 1015: 820: 773: 749: 626: 583: 522: 1755: 1497: 1057: 566: 3614:

Reminder: Please sign new Wikimedia confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information by 15 December

3571:

She is attempting to use any methods to remove a page that met the reason she requested the deletion.

3446:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was 3163:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was 3289: 3243: 3105: 3064: 2924: 2825: 2222: 2149: 2130: 1210: 1197: 950:

FYI: I already gave you access to the private IRC channel #wikimedia-privacy. Please don't forget to

190: 185:

Thanks for editing Knowledge (XXG), and we look forward to you being a part of the Collaborative! --

3805:

This is still technically out of speedy deletion criteria. Can you please restore the redirect, per

1148: 3524: 3494: 2806: 2783: 2737: 2577: 2235: 2188: 2038: 1835: 1793: 1661: 1405: 1384: 1201: 1031: 1022: 985: 961: 915:

It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can

414:

It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can

3621: 2915:

Thanks for fixing Arthur's page. I'll know to find an admin, rather than userfy, next time I find

2843:

Hello. I don't understand your recent edits to my talk page. I have not seen this before. Thanks.

2646:

For all of the behind-the-scenes work you do with FP (and I know I’ve recently given you a lot)…--

3810: 3772: 3639:

I wanted to follow-up on an message I sent you in September regarding the need for you to sign a

3582: 3211: 2437: 1514: 1409: 1388: 879: 872: 719: 689: 245: 3806: 2916: 2178:. As you can see, this matches quite perfectly with the one pictured in the newspaper article. 471:

Please do keep reading my drivel. You may in fact find some of it interesting, if not amusing.

3872: 3839: 3794: 3305: 3282: 3268: 3122: 3009: 2944: 2876: 2687: 2670: 2651: 2611: 2462: 2355: 2310: 2198: 2170:

article states that the house pictured is "at Potash Hill and Westminster roads in Sprague".

2024: 1982: 1961: 1937: 1923: 1909: 1860: 1819: 1467: 1454: 1366: 1308: 1236: 1134: 858: 839: 838:. One hour on the train from Piccadilly for about a tenner. I've signed up. You should too! -- 707: 665: 547:

larvae use their long sickle-shaped mandibles to destroy any other eggs or larvae around them?

318: 277: 47: 17: 3672:

If you have any questions or experience any problems while signing the new agreement, please

3370:

If you have any questions or experience any problems while signing the new agreement, please

3257:, good work. :) I hope you didn't think the 'dummy' was aimed at you? It's an actual thing: 178: 3745: 3723: 3319:

Please sign new Wikimedia confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information by 15 December

2983: 2553: 2384: 2375: 2326: 2289: 2100: 2054: 1892: 1614: 1588: 1174: 1111: 816: 765: 745: 741: 579: 3048: 2957: 2665:

I left this on your Commons page, but I'm not sure how often you are there. Thanks again.--

2171: 2042: 3693: 3391: 3285: 3254: 3239: 3101: 3060: 2920: 2888: 2848: 2217: 2187:

I'd go get a picture of course, except this has been figured out by sleuthing (along with

2144: 2125: 1205: 835: 225: 186: 100: 3768: 3261:. I just wanted to make sure that attribution was appropriately given for the contents! 2866: 2266:

Hello, Julia W. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started,

2050: 736:

Hi. Can you offer your opinion on which photo is more appropriate for the Infobox in the

3188: 2418: 2176: 1258:

which I authored in the few weeks of my current account before Timotheus wiped me out.

3520: 3490: 3450: 3441: 2801: 2779: 2733: 2588: 1831: 1789: 981: 955: 3460:. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page 3177:. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page 117:

is a group of women from around the world who edit Knowledge (XXG), contribute to its

3207: 1670: 1572: 1510: 1051: 897: 715: 685: 241: 3092: 3087: 2522:

You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page

1975:

Thanks, Sarah! I'm already signed up on Facebook so got your message there first.

1609:

on December 24, 2013. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at

311:

I live in Manchester near the city centre and so no, would not need accommodation.

3833: 3788: 3299: 3276: 3262: 3116: 2938: 2870: 2681: 2666: 2647: 2605: 2456: 2349: 2304: 2192: 2018: 1976: 1854: 1813: 1725: 1491: 1360: 1302: 1230: 1169:

on November 7, 2013. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at

1130: 1106:

on October 28, 2013. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at

935: 852: 842: 701: 659: 539: 529: 434: 312: 271: 147: 3841: 3818: 3796: 3780: 3753: 3704: 3528: 3498: 3307: 3293: 3270: 3247: 3221: 3124: 3109: 3068: 3014: 2991: 2946: 2928: 2892: 2878: 2852: 2833: 2814: 2787: 2741: 2689: 2674: 2657: 2613: 2590: 2566: 2464: 2446: 2397: 2357: 2334: 2312: 2297: 2243: 2229: 2200: 2156: 2137: 2108: 2064: 2026: 2010: 1995:

Can you see if you received my e-mail about a page I created 2 years ago? FLFaye

1984: 1969: 1945: 1931: 1917: 1898: 1862: 1839: 1821: 1797: 1673: 1622: 1575: 1524: 1419: 1392: 1368: 1350: 1310: 1293: 1238: 1218: 1182: 1138: 1119: 989: 967: 900: 886: 860: 845: 824: 778: 753: 723: 709: 693: 667: 642: 587: 494: 452: 399: 378: 346: 320: 298: 279: 264: 249: 229: 1908:

Sorry, but I think you might have forgotten to answer about expired citations. --

1742:. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page 1484:. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page 1044:. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page 553:. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page 3871:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

3471: 2267: 2260: 2095:

on July 16, 2014. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at

1883: 1475: 1462: 737: 390:

We've finalised the list of attendees and you're amongst the 12. See you there!

46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

2074: 811:

on May 31, 2013. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at

2978:

on May 5, 2015. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at

2909: 2884: 2860: 2844: 2508: 2498: 1731: 1709: 560: 544: 221: 3654:

An important part of that transition is helping volunteers like you sign the

3352:

An important part of that transition is helping volunteers like you sign the

2516:

raid termite mounds so effectively they have been nicknamed after the fierce

714:

Yes, it's from mr Sakk's book, I've added the citation now as well. Cheers,

3765:

Knowledge (XXG):Featured picture candidates/Marina (ship, 2011), Sète 01.jpg

3039: 2597: 2581: 2533: 2274:

that lacks references. If you don't want Holly Smale to be deleted, please

1749: 84: 3646:

As you may know, the Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees approved a new

3344:

As you may know, the Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees approved a new

787: 208: 1633: 1535: 3513: 2725: 1038:

are declining due to over-collection for the food industry and pet trade?

85:

WikiWomen's Collaborative: Come join us (and check out our new website)!

3258: 2114: 1638: 1301:

drama, etc. I have no interest in looking into your request. Sorry.

680: 3084:

I uploaded two photos of Costus curvibracteatus to wikimedia commons:

3360:

required to sign the confidentiality agreement under the new policy.

3227:

2014 Ebola Virus in West Africa timeline of reported cases and deaths

1772: 1721: 1074: 2704: 1478:" because they clump together in great numbers for unknown reasons? 601: 3722: 3592:

proof that she has targeted the removal of Larissa Dubois page.

2956: 2073: 1587: 1147: 1084: 805:

File:Twintowers of Deutsche Bank Headquarter in Frankfurt a.M..jpg

790:

File:Twintowers of Deutsche Bank Headquarter in Frankfurt a.M..jpg

3509:

it will take about 10 minutes to complete. Please fill it in at:

3093:

https://commons.wikimedia.org/File:Costus_curvibracteatus_02.jpg

3088:

https://commons.wikimedia.org/File:Costus_curvibracteatus_01.jpg

155: 3668:

Confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information/How to sign

3504:

Help us improve wikimeets by filling in the UK Wikimeet survey!

3366:

Confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information/How to sign

3028: 2778:

start-up; your ideas and contributions are much appreciated. --

975:

Knowledge (XXG):Featured picture candidates/Albanian water frog

3850: 3417: 3134: 3023: 2474: 2281:

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on

1685: 1430: 998: 505: 270:

Yes, I'm still interested and have that weekend free for it.

25: 3631: 3336: 3020:

Russian criminal tattoos has been nominated for Did You Know

1714:, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was 1637: 1539: 1459:, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was 1027:, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was 905: 893:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

871: 534:, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was 404: 207: 99: 2431:

Julia, Your suggestion and help in getting me started with

163: 912:

Hello, Julia W. Please check your email; you've got mail!

411:

Hello, Julia W. Please check your email; you've got mail!

3001:

Knowledge (XXG):Featured picture candidates/My Man Jeeves

3175:

Template:Did you know nominations/Costus curvibracteatus

917: 416: 2680:

Oh, I hadn't seen it! Will look and respond now. :D

1873:

Delist nomination that you may want to be involved in.

2191:) and I actually live no where near this place. :) 2047:

Knowledge (XXG):Requests_for_undeletion#Luiz_Palhares

1531:

Knowledge (XXG):Featured picture candidates/Lyme Hall

1042:

Template:Did you know nominations/Albanian water frog

3456: