User talk:Justinm1978/Archive 1

1891:

Gamma Sigma Sigma should not be editing it and it appears that she feels that the Gamma Sigma Sigma National Board should be the ones determining who should edit it. She just doesn't get Knowledge (XXG) at all. This is quite clear given her deletion of *all* references. I'll take a look after you make your changes and see if I think anything else can be salvaged. I'm tempted to completely revert almost everything she did. The only one that really seems appropriate to keep is that GSS doesn't call it cardinal principals, they call them ideals.

142: 2981:

self-mediated that and came to an amicable conclusion. Months later, I put some articles up for AfD that she happened to be working on as I felt they didn't fit the notability guidelines, she got incredibly upset. They were not deleted because I should've done them one at a time, and her bad-faith noms of two articles I had worked on were also not deleted. That was really my last interaction with her up until yesterday when I saw she was putting together a case to have me banned. I've had some issues with

2245:

see the first and last chapter on a full-page browser window (1152x864 resolution), then the list needs to be placed in 2 columns. If after that, I still can't see the list in whole without scrolling, it needs to be its own page. Not a very scientific measure, I know, but that's where I'd place my criteria. If we have to have chapter lists, I'm completely in agreement with the discussion on the project page that individual chapter links are not allowed, per WP:DIRECTORY, and have been editing as such.

1662: 31: 1578:. Alan, as personal attacks go, that one is pretty tame. Justin, that comment has nothing whatsoever to do with the development of an encyclopedia article and off-topic talk page comments can be removed on demand, particularly when they are addressed at one editor in particular and no response is needed. But either way, this is about as lame as a thing to argue over. Please stop. -- 2634:"prestigious" simply because they are hard to define. I've seen people here on Knowledge (XXG) argue that MIT isn't prestigious and only the Ivy League should be considered so. Of course that isn't my opinion, but you can see my point. It's a fluff term which cheapens the article and really should not be used in cases like this, especially in the opening paragraph. 1774: 1344:

article altogether. Either one of those I'll support, but at this time I have not yet been convinced that I need to change. I have no intention of giving into threats and bullying from other users (not you, but the person who is most adamant against this and is disrupting the AfD discussion with attacks on me)

1294:) and then, in the same paragraph, asking them to be civil seems to me to be contradictory. If you wish people to be civil to you, please help them do this by being civil yourself. I have no background on the dispute myself, but when I see people acting like that it tends to skew my sympathies to the other side. 1521:, it has to remain, no matter how much you dislike it. Especially in a talk page on a page that you put up for deletion and continued to fight even after consensus went against the deletion. It looks like in reading the complaint that you filed that others agree with me that it does not fail these policies. 1498:

better held elsewhere and definitely do not contribute to the progress of any article. If we are to maintain civility here, we must remain focussed on the task, not the people. There are dedicated areas where a person may make a complaint against an editor. These places do not accept anonymous complaints.

2278:

Well, and adding the APO list would be completely redundant, as that is easily accessible online. I'm noting as well that these are starting to look like Baird's. I'd like to come up with some kind of a guide on chapter lists, but I'm not the best to write it because my bias is to do away with them

2007:

like you stated above. My thought is that if it's on the webpage, it's a good start to writing more detail into the article, but I wouldn't be ok with a blanket copy/paste. Unfortunately, their page leaves a lot to be desired in terms of information-gathering. I'm noting that about a lot of GLO's,

1890:

page. My guess is that even though not logged in that there are made by the person who had the gssmarketing account who is the members of the GSS national board for marketing. In my email conversation with her, she definitely refereing to it as "Our Knowledge (XXG) page" indicating that people not in

1731:

In fact I got mixed up while reviewing your contribs and the other user's. I realized my mistake when double checking (I usually double check CU blocks). I know there is no (easy) way to remove a block from the log so I only hope you'll accept my deepest apologies. I hope the unblock message is clear

955:

I dunno, I put the page up for protection, and was told to just watch and revert because it's not enough to warrant protection. You can try if you want, and I'll support your opinion, but I wouldn't get your hopes up though. If protection/admin intervention fails, I'll keep watching/reverting in the

697:

So you are noting that part of the policy, but completely ignoring the paragraph above it which supports my viewpoint, as well as that of other editiors contributing to the article and discussion. How about contributing to the article and enhancing it instead of blanket-deleting aspects of it simply

2713:

True, I shouldn't be stooping down to the same level, and kinda wish I had worded it a bit differently. Thank you for the admonishment :) I'm forming the MfD now, as the whole thing just isn't sitting right with me and rather than go back and forth with someone who won't change their mind, I'm just

1539:

Justin, think about what you're saying here. There was a discussion about content, which ultimately was resolved. Agreed not all parties were satisfied, but the issue has been put to rest. An anonymous posting was made, accusing me of acting in bad faith. I removed the anonymous remark because I

1343:

I disagree that this is not a fair AfD. These articles have been up for months with no real contributions. I'll consider withdrawal if consensus is unable to be reached in a few days, but as it looks right now, I think it'll go to a merge into the sorority article, or will be merged into their own

850:

I'd like to invite you to join this mediation to try to get this dispute resolved, if you wish to do so; note, however, it is entirely your choice whether or not you participate, and if you don't wish to take part in it that's perfectly alright. Please read the above request and, if you do feel that

747:

That I would agree with. My best guess, especially with the fact that college is out of session so information isn't always easy to come by, would be a month at the max. If we can't find anything in that amount of time, then I agree that they're not notable enough to be mentioned and deserve to be

2943:

that she is maintaining on me) and definitely is not happy with what I do here. (which I admit, isn't a whole lot, but I feel that someone has to do the mundane, minor details :) I'm not opposed to any kind of mediation, I'm just not certain what there is to mediate since this is less of a dispute

2848:

I reverted your edit to Kappa Kappa Psi, where you switched it from "Recognition" to "Honorary, Service" on the basis that Bairds has no such category. A simple Google book search shows Baird's 19th edition does indeed recognize "recognition"-society fraternities (see index page xiii), and in fact

2293:

I think a lot of these are easily available online, but there are other things elsewhere on Knowledge (XXG) that are easily available online... Be interesting to at least find out what the general feeling is. I don't remember any of the NPHC groups having theirs up, but that may have to do with the

2244:

I'm not a big fan of any chapter lists at all, as I see them as something that should be found on the organization's website which is more likely to be updated when chapters are founded or de-chartered. I've come to accept it as a barely-necessary evil, though. In my head, I'd say that if I can't

2053:

thanks for your corrections on "correct use of semicolon", I've always done it the opposite as you see. I also include a comma after the last ittem in a list, (for example, Justin, Naraht, and Dr. Cash). Should there be comma after Naraht? I was told it doesn't matter as long as you use the same

1744:

I'm sorry your good name was besmirched. The edit history looked very suspicious and I listed all diffs related to the edits. Your account seemed to be the master account. Looking at the history and talk page I would have made the request again so this is not an apology for the event but for the

1163:

does not publish everything for the public, some items are for the public only and some are for members only, which clearly states in our by-laws that we cannot share with the public. A couple of the items stuck out to me, because only a member would know them which is why I asked the editor if she

944:

Looks like the anon has added back the tags to the list section. I don't think continually reverting is a permanent solution. I think this should be brought to an admin's attention as the personal attacks have made the page impossible to work on. I wanted to get you opinion as to the best way to

670:

suggests. Tagging with {{fact}} or {{not verified}} is clearly written as acceptable policy. You are going way too far on this, and editors are objecting. I suggest you stop and try to build community and enhance Knowledge (XXG) instead of trying to turn it to your own personal interpretation of

583:

The words "Notable" and "famous" do not set a consistent standard, they just provide a pretext for disputes. They are a total waste of space. I suggest that an appropriate and enforceable standard would be to insist that there are no red links. That way the standards applied will be those agreed by

2980:

It "all started" when I went through an started classifying greek-lettered organizations as social that were previously classified as service. There was a mediation case that settled the issue. Then I started standardizing more greek life articles so the naming conventions would be the same. We

2674:

I'd like to assume good faith, but given the entire conversation on the original MfD discussion and the editor's talk page, I'm having a difficult time with it. I'll give it some thought over the next couple of days, and see where things go before I make a decision on whether or not to nominate.

2345:

Also, I think all the red alumni wiki links are justified on this page. Note that I left many names without a red link. I feel the people with red links need a page. Someone should create a page. Wilma Vaught was the first woman to achieve the rank of General in the Air Force. Matthew Paul is

1158:

Just wanted to say hello, I'm new to Knowledge (XXG) and you've made a couple of comments to me. I wanted to say, I have no issue with anyone changing the page obviously anyone can edit, but as a proud member of the organization I would like the information to be correct as I'm sure you would with

991:

To cite diffs: go to the edit history, and select two consecutive versions via the radio buttons, and click the button at the top that says "compare". That will open up a new page. Take that new page's URL, paste it into the case page, and stick brackets on it. Add a timestamp or something else

2801:

thank you for making it to the FSU pages but the user that created Sammy Seminole took information from the source and skewed it himself. It was simply rewritten with all of the facts from the source page. I would love for you to bring it up in talk so that other users of the WP:FSU can come to

2412:

He was also in the faculty section. Considering he was a graduate student, he needs to be moved to a different category. I deleted him because his categorization wasn't factual. You can move him to a category you find appropriate. Also, I might add, that perhaps we need to have a discussion on

2069:

I've always learned that the semicolon goes where a longer pause in saying the sentence would be, whereas the comma goes where a brief natural pause to break up the sentence flow. The comma thing I think you're right on, but I'm not sure on that either as I often over-comma my sentences (again,

1906:

We could just revert everything, and then redo the wikipedia-appropriate content. I'd be a lot more in favor of that rather than trying to fix what was done. I was also considering redoing the userbox to make it inline with the rest of the greek userboxes, but I'll hold off on that for a little

1497:

Justin, I don't need a policy to clarify that someone accusing of me of disrupting Knowledge (XXG) because I challenged a source for an article is offensive. We are supposed to be discussing the content on Knowledge (XXG) and not making allegations about a person's motives. Such discussions are

766:

Works for me, let's go ahead and place something in the top of the article saying that they've got until Aug 1 to get some references, otherwise anything unreferenced is subject to deletion. I think it's a fair collaboration (win-win) and thank you for being willing to work toward this solution.

685:

Jimmy Wales, founder of Knowledge (XXG), has said of this: "I can NOT emphasize this enough. There seems to be a terrible bias among some editors that some sort of random speculative 'I heard it somewhere' pseudo information is to be tagged with a 'needs a cite' tag. Wrong. It should be removed,

1237:

that you might want to bear in mind, about what is and is not likely to be considered notable. I suggest you are selective in what you nominate for AfD--start with the least notable. All I can give is advice about the way things are likely to be seen here, and I give her as well as you the most

811:

Not really, I simply suggested this be the test. But since you're not sure if its based on title Ix or Bairds, you can't change APA until the decision is solidified and the litmus test is agreed to by all editors and all groups are subject to the same standard. When we're ready to update the

512:

Restoring the article to its status before the disputed content was raised is not vandalism or unconstructive. Knowledge (XXG) rules allow for the unwanted change to be reverted and then a disussion should take place on the article's talk page. The article should remain in this state until a

2633:

I just wanted to make it clear that I am not questioning the quality of UIUC at all. The school is world renowned and is no doubt among the best in the county. However, if you look other flagship school pages, they do make an effort to avoid terms and phrases such as "highly selective" and

2177:

article. I have not researched the author, but if he is prize winning and an alumnus, then I think he deserves to remain on the page. The lack of a wiki page should not bar someone from the article. In fact, many noteable people on the list do not have pages. Let me know if you

2446:

I am the person who keeps editing the Notable Alpha Phi Omega Members page to say that John F Kennedy recieved honorary membership from Epsilon Mu and not Eta Phi. I have a newspaper article as my source. However, you keep reverting the edit. Can you please revert the page back?

1439:. I understand that removing another editors comments is considered controversial, but considering the comment is about me and otherwise unsigned I believe you should leave it to my discretion if I find it to be a personal attack or not. Thank you for your understanding. 1834:

Per my previous talk page entry, this block was done accidentally by Lucasbfr. Please remove the block immediately and remove all history of it from my talk page history. I do not wish for this rather insulting bit of incorrect checkuser block to be part of my history.

985:

Yes, you do need to cite them. Remember, the CU is not as familiar with the situation as the filer, and the CU also can't spend a long time trying to figure out exactly what edits are the problem. You do this by showing diffs. If you know how to do this, skip the next

1112:

Yeah, dude, take it easy with the reverts. It would seem to me that the consensus on the talk page, after I *did* read it, was that mascot is a POV term, not symbol. Why include it in the article when it is clearly not necessary and there is no consensus for it, and

2263:

Then I am definitely *not* trying to add APO's list back. :) For good or ill, the standard for Greek Letter Organization pages is looking more and more like Baird's and that *did* come with chapter lists. Perhaps we could come up with a guide on the Wikiproject

2989:) that I should've resolved in a more civil manner. That's when she started going through my edit history and compiling a list of every perceived violation (Including ones that were resolved in mediation that she agreed to) and threatening to have me banned. 851:

you'd like to take part, please make a note of this on the mediation request page. If you have any questions or queries relating to this or any other dispute, please do let me know; I'll try my best to help you out. Thank you very much. Best regards,

1512:

That's fine that you do not feel you need a policy, however Knowledge (XXG) disagrees with you, hence why they have a policy and the expectation is that users follow it. A talk page is where discussions and comments belong. Unless this fails

355: 736:

I've thought about this overnight. How about if I restore the redlinks and put a "citation needed" tag on all of them? How long would you think the tag should stay before the item gets deleted due to lack of verifiable sources?

398: 1355:

I'd recommend adding all the material you can find into an article on the foundation of the sorority and then when this is ready, re-listing individual articles that have no notability past being a founder. However, ones like

1977:

Made some changes as well. What official permission would be needed in order to have things directly copied from the Gamma Sig web page. Would the person who made the change simply have to identify themselves as a corporate

365: 545:

Talk page regarding Skip Mason. Mason is not the Fraternity's Historian; he is instead College Archivist for Morehouse College and Alpha Phi Alpha's Chairman of the National Historical Commission. He is also author of

1117:

does not have one single mention of the term "mascot". Don't revert people just because you disagree with what they changed, and don't assume they haven't read the talk page. You just make yourself look like a jerk.

360: 2341:

I have added references to the page for all alumni listed. Do the references meet verifiability standards in your opinion? In the future, I ask that you post a citation tag and add a note before you delete.

1415:

I closed the AfD as Keep per consensus, if you wish to relist individually that is of course up to you. It might be best to leave it for a bit though as rapid renominations can be frowned upon. Regards to you,

1137:

there is no consensus that both terms belong. Mascot is POV to some and symbol is POV to others. Had you read the talk page you'd see that, and wouldn't be injecting your POV and rehashing an old argument.

1921:

I'm in favor of that. Would you rather I did that since she already knows (and apparently dislikes) me. She objected to the fact that I had reverted something else that a member of the GSS board had changed.

403: 1392:

be deleted, but with such varying degrees of notability I think it would be best to do them individually. When you re-list them this will be their first individual AfD, so I'd just put first nomination.

843: 1031: 2916:

Have you two tried to talk it out peacefully over either of your talk pages? If not, do you want me to try to mediate? I may be retiring, but I don't want anymore drama (I had my fill for a while).

2653:

It's not as bad as the first one, but it still appears to be somewhat divisive to me, and considering the history behind the creation, I'm sure there's more to it than first meets the eye...I try to

2202: 2136:

has been been recently maintenanced by you. What are the sections that are peacock and inappropriate? Also, does this mean that the unreferenced wiki ref can be deleted? 11:30, 23 January 2008 (CST)

2472:

Thanks - yeah I read all the articles, looked at a few other fraternity pages (noteably ) but couldn't figure out what it was talking about, so I was taking potshots. Hopefully this one works out.

279: 513:

consensus has been reached by the editors. I believe the discussion is on-going on the NPHC talk page, so it should not have been reverted by you or Narahat (or something similar). Thank You.--

2875: 666:

is being followed, you are disrupting by blanket-deleting non-negative information without giving reasonable time to provide references rather than discussing the matter on the talk page, as

2174: 718:

Besides, what's the big deal? If you have sources, write a sourced article, and it's all okay. If you have no sources, we can not have the speculative information in Knowledge (XXG).

2992:

Since she has declined any kind of mediation, I don't see what can be done here at this point but to let her gather her evidence, allow me to gather mine, and roll the dice I guess?

1260: 2229:

I am apparently more lenient that you are on chapter lists. What criteria are you using to determine whether a list of chapters should be maintained in article or in a linked page?

2413:

alumni v. graduates. A number of names were removed from the list previously because they were not graduates. If we include those who attended, the list will become much longer.

1164:

was a member. No harm, no foul. Just very passionate about my sorority, my Redskins and the list goes on (smile). I do know a few members of your organization, pretty cool people!

1214:

Miranda is right--anyone can remove a prod for any reason, and it cannot be added back. See WP:PROD. The thing to do now is to send the articles to WP:AFD. I cannot imagine that

2985:

lately (I put two templates up for deletion, one was deleted as an attack, and the re-write was kept because I withdrew my nomination. Other issue included perceived attack on

1686:

process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Knowledge (XXG)'s criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also

264: 1963:

Yeah, that looks good. The two changes I made in there were all reverts or copyedits that could easily be redone. We may need to request protection if it continues, though.

1540:

felt it was insulting. Why would you feel keeping this remark on the talk page would in anyway benefit wikipedia if not to further a view point that I am acting maliciously?

972: 494:

to re-nominate and update the links on the article itself and the AfD listing. (Although personally I think this AfD is a lost cause, I have to say - he is well-known for

223: 1327:

Justin, withdraw this arguably unfair AfD, and relist them separately. Some of them are notable. I will certtainly support some of the deletions, but not all of them.

487: 431: 1218:

the articles in question will be found notable, unless more information is provided, but that is the only way to remove them. If you need any help , let me know.

269: 2510:— hopefully you can come to a compromise, perhaps it just needs to be reworded. If you still feel that the userbox is in violation, then list it for deletion at 2817:

Secondly user Badagnani has an anti Native American binge right now skewing all articles for his view. Members have been workin hard to maintain a neutral POV

345: 370: 2876:

http://books.google.com/books?client=firefox-a&id=d2YIAAAAMAAJ&dq=%22kappa+kappa+psi%22&q=%22kappa+kappa+psi%22+recognition&pgis=1#MAAJ&d

350: 307: 284: 491: 380: 317: 312: 302: 523: 1309:

That's how I read it. Maybe as you say, not what you meant, but that's how it seemed. Anyway, things seem to have calmed down a little on the AfD now.

461: 340: 158: 274: 2944:

about content and more of her wanting me removed from Knowledge (XXG). Guidance and feedback on how to proceed from here are welcome, though :)

188: 2319: 2294:

fact that they would want to include the Graduate chapters as well and there are a lot of those with a fair amount of creation and deletion...

646:

If the WikiProject can't follow the inviolate policies of Knowledge (XXG), it doesn't deserve to exist. Just what am I "disrupting"? Follow

218: 183: 1119: 839:, an informal mediation initiative here on Knowledge (XXG). You've recently been named as a dispute participant in a mediation request here: 246: 1687: 908:, specifically the Omega Psi Phi discussion which is not relevant to improving the article can be removed. Please do not make this into a 585: 1196:. Prods can be removed. If this is you logging out from an IP address to put prods on pages that I am working on, I find that to be very 878:

Hi, you recently blanked this page. If you feel the redirect that was there is inappropriate, you can nominate it for deletion using the

1095:. I understand entirely that the recent set of edits that have gone back and forth are rehashing old ground on the article, but please 626: 2613:

I placed it there originally, but also placed it on yours to notify you then forgot to re-word it after it inserted the text. My bad.

757:

All right, what I will do is tonight, restore the red links, then we can set a date for, say, the first of August for further review?

1694:). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Knowledge (XXG) or discuss the relevant issues at 2574:

Interesting read. I've been looking for a similar document to this for non-Knowledge (XXG) related reasons. Thanks for sharing it.

1709: 727:

How can I contribute to the article, when even its strongest supporters admit that there is no reliable information for the claims?

886:

if it's likely to be contested. Blanking the page is not appropriate and I have therefore restored the original redirect. Thanks. →

375: 335: 213: 208: 203: 198: 193: 178: 149: 2939:

Hi Kwsn. I'm not sure what there is to mediate. Miranda and I certainly have had our disagreements in the past (as noted in her

2506:}}, but edit warring over the userbox list is not the proper way to handle this. You should start with a direct discussion with 2487: 2864: 66: 1051: 2832: 2147:

RJT011000 - Thank you for the response. I have posed some other questions for you. Thank you for taking an interest with the

1280:

Heh :) I agree, and that's why I moved the "discussion" away so it doesn't taint the vote on what I'm trying to accomplish.

2739:

Why did you undo all of my edits. I placed in cited historical and non biased information which shows this to be the true.

2398:

In regards to your last edit, Steven K. never graduated. The list only includes graduates, not those who simply attended.

1683: 1557: 1455: 424: 2328: 2070:

reflecting natural pauses in my speech a a large portion of my contributions are done with a speech-to-text converter.)

2003:(reset indent) I'm not sure if that would be acceptable, because that lends credence to the marketing person wanting to 2206: 1935:

Sure, I've already made enough "non-friends" for a while :) I'll try to get the infobox done today after the revert.

836: 79:

Welcome to Knowledge (XXG). I see you have already found the userbox. :) I'm one of the people who ends up editing the

417: 859: 38: 2768:

ok i'm going to file for an RFC to see the opinions because you stated that the sources weren't neutral at all.

1605: 1435:

Please stop reverting my attempt to remove the personal attack that an anonymous editor had made against me on

1123: 2453:

I have e-mailed the national office to clear this up. BTW, how did you get the boy scout and APO userboxes? --

1016:

Okay, I understand. I'd put that in the OA article but I left my handbook at home when I went off to college.

2503: 2152: 2141: 1797: 1624: 1620: 1357: 141: 2940: 2852: 2820: 2475: 2158: 1691: 2787: 2773: 2758: 2744: 1035: 946: 1793: 1017: 1008: 123:, whom you added to the list of Eagle Scouts? It's not good to have red links in a featured list. Thanks. 2997: 2949: 2896: 2719: 2680: 2618: 2579: 2539: 2507: 2432: 2418: 2403: 2388: 2373: 2354: 2284: 2250: 2214: 2183: 2075: 2013: 1968: 1940: 1912: 1840: 1695: 1526: 1487: 1361: 1143: 852: 83:

page more than most, I guess. I'm an alumnus of Kappa Chapter at Carnegie-Mellon U. (Pledged Fall 1986)

47: 17: 2110:, which shows Justin is correct. I read the article about serial comma and yes, it can be confusing.-- 2483: 1601: 1398: 1377: 1314: 1299: 2198: 1746: 1197: 2958:

What's the general problem exactly, or better yet, how did it get started from your point of view?

2882: 2860: 2702: 2662: 2602: 2564: 2523: 1454:

As you continue to revert my removal of the content, I have filed a complaint for outside comment.

1436: 1165: 872: 1292:

Surprise, surprise....if Miranda doesn't like someone making a change, then it must be disruptive.

975:

shows no diffs as evidence for a checkuser. Could you supply some as evidence on the case page?

499: 2828: 2807: 2458: 2368:

Can you help me move the people you deleted to the talk page? I have started but need some help.

2323: 2008:

actually. Makes me appreciate the work that M&T puts into making our info available online.

1813: 781: 758: 738: 728: 719: 689: 655: 637: 533: 2635: 2553: 1514: 992:

descriptive to it, and repeat until you feel you have enough material to illustrate your point.

1661: 2783: 2769: 2754: 2740: 1887: 1754: 1565: 1556:

As you seem concerned to have a Knowledge (XXG) policy spell out decent manners, I have found

1545: 1503: 1462: 1444: 1201: 1160: 571: 2593:

You placed the deletion notice on my page as the creator- this need to go to Allstarecho. --

1575: 1193: 905: 898: 879: 607: 2993: 2982: 2945: 2892: 2715: 2676: 2614: 2575: 2535: 2428: 2414: 2399: 2384: 2369: 2350: 2299: 2280: 2269: 2246: 2234: 2210: 2179: 2097: 2071: 2009: 1983: 1964: 1954: 1936: 1926: 1908: 1896: 1836: 1679: 1655: 1522: 1483: 1345: 1281: 1179: 1139: 957: 768: 749: 703: 676: 93: 2986: 2694: 2654: 2511: 2032: 2004: 1096: 909: 883: 2639: 2479: 2148: 2133: 2115: 2059: 2044: 1717: 1421: 1394: 1373: 1310: 1295: 1271: 1088: 542: 228: 80: 1518: 1479: 1475: 2039:

status. Please see Phi Iota Alpha to provide comments and/or Support of the nomination.

1850: 835:

Dear Justinm1978/Archive 1: Hello, my name is NicholasTurnbull; I'm a mediator from the

3001: 2975: 2968: 2953: 2933: 2926: 2900: 2886: 2878: 2868: 2856: 2836: 2811: 2791: 2777: 2762: 2748: 2723: 2708: 2698: 2684: 2668: 2658: 2643: 2622: 2607: 2597: 2583: 2569: 2559: 2543: 2528: 2518: 2491: 2462: 2436: 2422: 2407: 2392: 2377: 2358: 2331: 2303: 2288: 2273: 2254: 2238: 2218: 2187: 2162: 2119: 2101: 2079: 2063: 2048: 2028: 2017: 1987: 1972: 1958: 1944: 1930: 1916: 1900: 1875: 1844: 1825: 1758: 1738: 1721: 1649: 1609: 1587: 1569: 1549: 1530: 1507: 1491: 1466: 1448: 1425: 1402: 1381: 1348: 1338: 1318: 1303: 1284: 1274: 1249: 1229: 1206: 1182: 1168: 1147: 1127: 1107: 1076: 1062: 1040: 1020: 1011: 996: 979: 960: 949: 934: 891: 862: 816: 805: 784: 771: 761: 752: 741: 731: 722: 706: 692: 679: 658: 640: 620: 617: 592: 573: 536: 517: 502: 495: 468: 454: 127: 120: 109: 100: 87: 2194: 2054:

convention within whatever you're writing, (i.e. shool paper, article, thesis, etc.)--

699: 684: 672: 667: 663: 651: 647: 2824: 2803: 2454: 2448: 2036: 1949:

So, revert back to the DeanLaw entry that added the wikilink for the Baltimore Hotel?

1807: 1733: 1702: 1672: 1409: 1369: 1334: 1245: 1225: 1114: 1104: 636:

tag on something, remove it, and make the person with the claim prove their claim."

589: 527: 483: 475: 2318:

Just to let you know that a case you recently submitted to SSP has been closed. See

1178:

Hello!!! Are citations the same as footnotes? Can you provide an example. Thanks

460:

Thank you for joining the project. Could you list yourself and your interests here:

2910: 2349:

If you think other links in the page should be "de-wikified" that is another story.

2089: 1854: 1750: 1628: 1561: 1541: 1499: 1458: 1440: 1365: 1070: 1056: 993: 976: 915: 1708:

template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to

1159:

your organization. Yes, some of the books are reliable sources and some are not.

1103:

as it's clear that the editor is trying to improve the article as he sees it. --

2295: 2265: 2230: 2107: 2093: 1979: 1950: 1922: 1907:

while longer until we get a page we can revert back to when this happens again.

1892: 1583: 1482:, otherwise you're just censoring a talk page, which isn't kosher by any means. 1238:

accurate advice that I can, but what will happen at AfD is never predictable..

802: 465: 451: 124: 106: 97: 84: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

2657:, but sometimes history overrides such assumptions. An MfD couldn't hurt.... 2111: 2055: 2040: 1713: 1417: 1268: 813: 514: 486:

for AfD. However, it appears this article was up for AfD in 2005 and the page

551: 2960: 2918: 612:

Blatantly promotional material, with no attempt to be encyclopaedic (we...)

1329: 1240: 1220: 548:

Talented Tenth: The Founders and Presidents of Alpha Phi Alpha Fraternity

526:. Neither of you are vandalizing the article, so stop the namecalling. ·· 154: 2753:

how is the information non neutral? would you simply like to do an RFC?

1886:

I see that you are working salvaging the changes made overnight to the

1007:

I fail to see how my edit to Tribe of Mic-O-Say was a "POV Statement".

887: 1768: 1579: 492:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Jonti Picking (2nd nomination)

2849:

lists Kappa Kappa Psi under the heading "RECOGNITION" on page 54.

844:

Knowledge (XXG):Mediation Cabal/Cases/2007-06-29 Infobox Fraternity

522:

I've asked Ccson as well: please stop calling each other vandals.

1472:(for continuity of discussion reposted from my talk page to here) 153:, a project dedicated to developing and improving articles about 1732:

enough to clear any confusion that may appear. Sorry again. --

1087:

Hi. I noticed that this morning, you reverted an edit over at

2427:

I changed the category from other to notorious. Do you agree?

1712:, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. 136: 25: 1660: 1099:. To me it's a real stretch to call the edit you reverted 1261:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Nellie Pratt Russell

1030:

I offered to mediate the current case you are involved in

2175:

List of University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign people

812:

infobox regarding type, let's leave APA as it has been.--

1266:

Hi. I encourage you both to step back from the brink. --

2714:

going to get some outside consensus and call it that.

2690: 1235: 490:

is therefore out of date. You need to create the page

450:

Also, see my response to your stub camp article entry.

119:

Could you please start an article, even if a stub, on

2844:

Bairds lists Kappa Kappa Psi as a recognition society

1478:. Please show how this meets any of the criteria in 2092:

for an absolutely mind-numbing discussion of it. :)

830:

The Mediation Cabal: Request for case participation

2346:credited with orchastrating McDonald's turnaround. 823:

Request for participation in a Mediation Cabal case

632:Jimmy Wales is extremely clear. "Don't just put a 488:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Jonti Picking

2689:You might want to be cautious about comments like 2383:I'll try to get to that later today or tomorrow. 1682:, suggesting that it be deleted according to the 1234:I have given Mirand some advice on her talk page 553:hope that answers your question re: reliability.- 105:Cool. I hope that Alpha Alpha @ UIUC is helping. 1596:User talk page returned to its rightful place... 1200:, because I am trying to make an article an FA. 498:and the page passed easily last nomination). -- 92:Are you involved with the APO prospect group at 1600:Done and sorted. Redirects deleted too. HTH. -- 616:Both of these are criteria for speedy deletion 1372:, so putting them all together seemed unwise. 1034:. I would appreciate a response. Sincerely, -- 1456:Knowledge (XXG):Wikiquette_alerts#Justinm1978 425: 8: 1474:I understand your feeling, but this isn't a 776:Thanks, I'll report it on the Talk page. I 462:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Scouting/Members 1688:Knowledge (XXG):What Knowledge (XXG) is not 698:because you don't agree with the method of 2173:You recently deleted Gerald Duff from the 1388:Sorry, I wasn't clear. I know all of them 654:, and you are not editing in good faith. 432: 418: 167: 1627:since User:Justinm19783 does not exist. 686:aggressively, unless it can be sourced. 586:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for discussion 524:Knowledge (XXG):Avoid the word "vandal" 1192:Please do not revert me when I remove 675:, which is not editing in good faith. 650:and there's no problem. Don't follow 541:Hi Justin, I saw your question at the 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 2697:and possibly even a violation of ]. 1710:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 1364:are much more notable than ones like 7: 1574:Guys, this is an edit war worthy of 1749:deserved his 3RR violation block. 1046:Possible solution to Mediation Case 801:Looks like Baird's carried the day! 627:List of collegiate secret societies 2502:I understand your concerns over {{ 1745:accidental block on your record. 1727:Re: Your block on User:Justinm1978 956:hopes they'll eventually go away. 147:You are invited to participate in 24: 2797:Thank you but fact check first ok 2322:for the final comments. Regards, 1558:Knowledge (XXG):Assume good faith 157:. You may sign up at the project 1772: 1290:Being sarcastic about somebody ( 356:V1.0 Scouting project statistics 140: 29: 945:go about this. Let me know. -- 2534:Fair enough, already started. 1668:Another editor has added the " 1083:Edit Summary for recent revert 1041:03:16, 24 September 2007 (UTC) 1021:19:47, 19 September 2007 (UTC) 1012:19:31, 19 September 2007 (UTC) 997:23:42, 11 September 2007 (UTC) 980:17:23, 11 September 2007 (UTC) 606:A copyright infringement from 1: 2492:03:38, 28 February 2008 (UTC) 2463:01:33, 24 February 2008 (UTC) 2408:19:16, 28 February 2008 (UTC) 2393:21:08, 11 February 2008 (UTC) 1790:for the following reason(s): 1426:20:37, 14 December 2007 (UTC) 1169:14:05, 30 November 2007 (UTC) 1148:05:33, 28 November 2007 (UTC) 1128:23:48, 27 November 2007 (UTC) 1054:. Please list your thoughts. 2378:05:18, 9 February 2008 (UTC) 2359:23:37, 7 February 2008 (UTC) 2332:21:53, 7 February 2008 (UTC) 2304:20:49, 4 February 2008 (UTC) 2289:20:42, 4 February 2008 (UTC) 2274:19:56, 4 February 2008 (UTC) 2255:19:18, 4 February 2008 (UTC) 2239:18:51, 4 February 2008 (UTC) 2219:16:47, 6 February 2008 (UTC) 2188:00:40, 31 January 2008 (UTC) 2163:23:45, 25 January 2008 (UTC) 2120:21:12, 24 January 2008 (UTC) 2102:18:14, 24 January 2008 (UTC) 2080:14:39, 24 January 2008 (UTC) 2064:14:34, 24 January 2008 (UTC) 2049:14:22, 22 January 2008 (UTC) 2018:15:06, 23 January 2008 (UTC) 1988:14:20, 23 January 2008 (UTC) 1973:16:38, 22 January 2008 (UTC) 1959:16:20, 22 January 2008 (UTC) 1945:16:06, 22 January 2008 (UTC) 1931:15:28, 22 January 2008 (UTC) 1917:15:09, 22 January 2008 (UTC) 1901:13:43, 22 January 2008 (UTC) 1876:08:29, 16 January 2008 (UTC) 1845:04:20, 16 January 2008 (UTC) 1826:04:58, 16 January 2008 (UTC) 1784:Your request to be unblocked 1759:18:42, 18 January 2008 (UTC) 1739:14:57, 15 January 2008 (UTC) 1722:21:29, 11 January 2008 (UTC) 1403:02:48, 8 December 2007 (UTC) 1382:02:29, 8 December 2007 (UTC) 1349:02:07, 8 December 2007 (UTC) 1339:01:56, 8 December 2007 (UTC) 1319:00:11, 8 December 2007 (UTC) 1304:23:18, 7 December 2007 (UTC) 1285:20:25, 7 December 2007 (UTC) 1275:20:16, 7 December 2007 (UTC) 1250:04:56, 4 December 2007 (UTC) 1230:03:50, 4 December 2007 (UTC) 1207:00:18, 4 December 2007 (UTC) 1183:00:14, 4 December 2007 (UTC) 1108:14:28, 11 October 2007 (UTC) 1077:05:01, 18 October 2007 (UTC) 574:16:27, 17 October 2007 (UTC) 482:Hi, I noticed you nominated 194:Announcements and open tasks 88:14:05, 26 October 2006 (UTC) 2782:will you agree to sign it? 2693:, that can be construed as 2675:Thanks for your feedback. 2552:You might want to see this 1650:23:17, 9 January 2008 (UTC) 1610:17:38, 7 January 2008 (UTC) 1588:18:53, 6 January 2008 (UTC) 1570:18:31, 6 January 2008 (UTC) 1550:18:21, 6 January 2008 (UTC) 1531:17:04, 6 January 2008 (UTC) 1508:14:53, 6 January 2008 (UTC) 1492:00:50, 6 January 2008 (UTC) 1467:15:11, 6 January 2008 (UTC) 1449:23:31, 5 January 2008 (UTC) 1063:22:16, 9 October 2007 (UTC) 961:03:51, 31 August 2007 (UTC) 950:03:20, 31 August 2007 (UTC) 935:00:23, 17 August 2007 (UTC) 892:10:42, 14 August 2007 (UTC) 361:V1.0 Scouting quality lists 3022: 3002:16:28, 18 April 2008 (UTC) 2976:16:00, 18 April 2008 (UTC) 2954:15:13, 18 April 2008 (UTC) 2934:14:29, 18 April 2008 (UTC) 2901:00:02, 18 April 2008 (UTC) 2887:00:00, 18 April 2008 (UTC) 2869:22:47, 17 April 2008 (UTC) 2837:17:03, 15 April 2008 (UTC) 2812:17:01, 15 April 2008 (UTC) 2792:23:30, 21 March 2008 (UTC) 2778:23:30, 21 March 2008 (UTC) 2763:23:25, 21 March 2008 (UTC) 2749:23:07, 21 March 2008 (UTC) 2724:20:46, 12 March 2008 (UTC) 2709:20:40, 12 March 2008 (UTC) 2685:20:01, 12 March 2008 (UTC) 2669:19:15, 12 March 2008 (UTC) 2644:16:16, 11 March 2008 (UTC) 2623:18:16, 11 March 2008 (UTC) 2608:17:54, 11 March 2008 (UTC) 2437:23:11, 18 March 2008 (UTC) 2205:for why the argument that 1771: 1692:Knowledge (XXG):Notability 1678:" template to the article 602:I deleted this article as 503:22:50, 29 April 2007 (UTC) 469:18:26, 15 April 2007 (UTC) 455:11:50, 15 April 2007 (UTC) 128:10:01, 28 March 2007 (UTC) 2584:21:46, 7 March 2008 (UTC) 2570:21:36, 7 March 2008 (UTC) 2544:20:39, 7 March 2008 (UTC) 2529:20:38, 7 March 2008 (UTC) 2423:01:02, 3 March 2008 (UTC) 1091:with the edit summary of 1068:I marked this as closed. 863:20:07, 30 June 2007 (UTC) 817:14:07, 29 June 2007 (UTC) 806:20:02, 28 June 2007 (UTC) 785:20:54, 28 June 2007 (UTC) 772:19:38, 28 June 2007 (UTC) 762:17:47, 28 June 2007 (UTC) 753:16:54, 28 June 2007 (UTC) 742:15:36, 28 June 2007 (UTC) 732:00:45, 28 June 2007 (UTC) 723:22:00, 27 June 2007 (UTC) 707:00:34, 28 June 2007 (UTC) 693:21:59, 27 June 2007 (UTC) 680:21:55, 27 June 2007 (UTC) 659:21:40, 27 June 2007 (UTC) 641:02:11, 27 June 2007 (UTC) 399:Girl Guiding and Scouting 270:Non-English article names 247:Scouting-related articles 110:11:09, 8 March 2007 (UTC) 101:03:04, 8 March 2007 (UTC) 75:Welcome my brother (APO). 2337:UIUC College of Business 940:List of Secret Societies 884:redirects for discussion 882:process or submit it to 780:trying to be fair! :) 621:05:59, 9 June 2007 (UTC) 593:02:13, 31 May 2007 (UTC) 366:V1.0 Scouting daily logs 2504:User:Allstarecho/scouts 1625:User talk:Justinm1978/3 1358:Harriet Josephine Terry 537:04:51, 6 May 2007 (UTC) 518:03:13, 6 May 2007 (UTC) 2468:re: Your Photo Changes 1665: 1621:User talk:Justinm19783 584:the whole commuity on 579:"Notable" and "Famous" 2088:Just to jump in. See 1664: 1362:Marie Woolfolk Taylor 42:of past discussions. 18:User talk:Justinm1978 1698:. If you remove the 404:Philmont Scout Ranch 330:Project organization 150:WikiProject Scouting 2364:List of UIUC People 2209:is also not valid. 1804:Request handled by: 1800:lifted or expired. 1560:for your perusal. 1437:Talk:Sigma Alpha Mu 971:The RFCU you filed 346:Member recognitions 265:Article maintenance 173:General information 2201:. Please see the 1666: 2973: 2931: 2871: 2855:comment added by 2839: 2823:comment added by 2707: 2667: 2494: 2478:comment added by 2207:other crap exists 2165: 1888:Gamma Sigma Sigma 1882:Gamma Sigma Sigma 1851:m:Right to Vanish 1832: 1831: 1684:proposed deletion 1174:DST Founder Pages 1161:Alpha Kappa Alpha 1097:assume good faith 1037:Тhε Rαnδom Eδιτor 947:Daniel J. Leivick 880:Proposed deletion 869: 868: 448: 447: 442: 441: 199:Pending deletions 184:Main project talk 179:Main project page 72: 71: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 3013: 2983:User:Allstarecho 2974: 2971: 2967: 2965: 2932: 2929: 2925: 2923: 2850: 2818: 2705: 2701: 2665: 2661: 2600: 2562: 2521: 2473: 2326: 2156: 1872: 1871: 1868: 1865: 1862: 1859: 1824: 1821: 1818: 1810: 1779: 1776: 1775: 1769: 1736: 1707: 1701: 1680:Sigma Iota Alpha 1677: 1671: 1656:Sigma Iota Alpha 1646: 1645: 1642: 1639: 1636: 1633: 1273: 1093:rvv from anon IP 1073: 1059: 1038: 932: 930: 927: 924: 921: 918: 827: 826: 598:lamda pi upsilon 569: 568: 567: 561: 560: 559: 531: 434: 427: 420: 381:Adopt-an-article 285:Using references 280:Media rationales 224:Article showcase 168: 164:More information 144: 137: 94:Parkland College 63: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 3021: 3020: 3016: 3015: 3014: 3012: 3011: 3010: 2969: 2961: 2959: 2927: 2919: 2917: 2914: 2846: 2799: 2737: 2703: 2663: 2651: 2631: 2598: 2560: 2519: 2500: 2470: 2444: 2442:John F. Kennedy 2366: 2339: 2324: 2316: 2227: 2171: 2149:Omega Delta Phi 2134:Omega Delta Phi 2130: 2128:Omega Delta Phi 2025: 2005:own the article 1884: 1869: 1866: 1863: 1860: 1857: 1856: 1819: 1814: 1808: 1806: 1777: 1773: 1767: 1734: 1729: 1705: 1699: 1675: 1669: 1659: 1643: 1640: 1637: 1634: 1631: 1630: 1617: 1602:Kurt Shaped Box 1598: 1476:personal attack 1433: 1431:Personal attack 1413: 1267: 1264: 1190: 1176: 1156: 1120:130.126.214.185 1089:Chief Illiniwek 1085: 1071: 1057: 1048: 1036: 1028: 1005: 969: 942: 928: 925: 922: 919: 916: 914: 902: 876: 837:Mediation Cabal 825: 799: 634:citation needed 630: 600: 581: 565: 564: 563: 557: 556: 555: 543:Alpha Phi Alpha 529: 510: 508:Alpha Phi Alpha 496:Weebl & Bob 480: 444: 443: 438: 409: 408: 394: 386: 385: 331: 323: 322: 298: 290: 289: 260: 252: 251: 242: 234: 233: 204:Pending renames 174: 165: 135: 117: 81:Alpha Phi Omega 77: 59: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 3019: 3017: 3009: 3008: 3007: 3006: 3005: 3004: 2990: 2913: 2907: 2906: 2905: 2904: 2903: 2891:Cool, thanks. 2845: 2842: 2841: 2840: 2802:consensus. -- 2798: 2795: 2767: 2736: 2733: 2731: 2729: 2728: 2727: 2726: 2711: 2650: 2647: 2630: 2627: 2626: 2625: 2599:Gadget850 (Ed) 2591: 2590: 2589: 2588: 2587: 2586: 2561:Gadget850 (Ed) 2547: 2546: 2520:Gadget850 (Ed) 2499: 2496: 2469: 2466: 2443: 2440: 2396: 2395: 2365: 2362: 2338: 2335: 2315: 2312: 2311: 2310: 2309: 2308: 2307: 2306: 2291: 2279:altogether :) 2258: 2257: 2226: 2225:Chapter lists. 2223: 2222: 2221: 2170: 2167: 2145: 2144: 2129: 2126: 2125: 2124: 2123: 2122: 2104: 2083: 2082: 2029:Phi Iota Alpha 2024: 2023:Phi Iota Alpha 2021: 2001: 2000: 1999: 1998: 1997: 1996: 1995: 1994: 1993: 1992: 1991: 1990: 1883: 1880: 1879: 1878: 1830: 1829: 1792: 1791: 1780: 1766: 1763: 1762: 1761: 1747:User:Rhetor230 1728: 1725: 1658: 1653: 1616: 1613: 1597: 1594: 1593: 1592: 1591: 1590: 1553: 1552: 1536: 1535: 1534: 1533: 1473: 1470: 1469: 1432: 1429: 1412: 1407: 1406: 1405: 1386: 1385: 1384: 1353: 1352: 1351: 1322: 1321: 1288: 1287: 1263: 1258: 1257: 1256: 1255: 1254: 1253: 1252: 1189: 1186: 1175: 1172: 1166:Knicksfan4ever 1155: 1152: 1151: 1150: 1084: 1081: 1080: 1079: 1047: 1044: 1027: 1024: 1018:StaticElectric 1009:StaticElectric 1004: 1001: 1000: 999: 988: 987: 968: 965: 964: 963: 941: 938: 901: 895: 875: 870: 867: 866: 848: 847: 832: 831: 824: 821: 820: 819: 798: 795: 794: 793: 792: 791: 790: 789: 788: 787: 716: 715: 714: 713: 712: 711: 710: 709: 629: 624: 614: 613: 610: 599: 596: 580: 577: 509: 506: 479: 473: 472: 471: 446: 445: 440: 439: 437: 436: 429: 422: 414: 411: 410: 407: 406: 401: 395: 392: 391: 388: 387: 384: 383: 378: 373: 368: 363: 358: 353: 348: 343: 338: 332: 329: 328: 325: 324: 321: 320: 315: 310: 305: 299: 296: 295: 292: 291: 288: 287: 282: 277: 272: 267: 261: 258: 257: 254: 253: 250: 249: 243: 240: 239: 236: 235: 232: 231: 226: 221: 216: 211: 206: 201: 196: 191: 186: 181: 175: 172: 171: 166: 163: 162: 145: 134: 131: 121:Richard Herman 116: 113: 76: 73: 70: 69: 64: 52: 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3018: 3003: 2999: 2995: 2991: 2988: 2984: 2979: 2978: 2977: 2972: 2966: 2964: 2957: 2956: 2955: 2951: 2947: 2942: 2938: 2937: 2936: 2935: 2930: 2924: 2922: 2912: 2908: 2902: 2898: 2894: 2890: 2889: 2888: 2884: 2880: 2877: 2874: 2873: 2872: 2870: 2866: 2862: 2858: 2854: 2843: 2838: 2834: 2830: 2826: 2822: 2816: 2815: 2814: 2813: 2809: 2805: 2796: 2794: 2793: 2789: 2785: 2780: 2779: 2775: 2771: 2765: 2764: 2760: 2756: 2751: 2750: 2746: 2742: 2734: 2732: 2725: 2721: 2717: 2712: 2710: 2706: 2700: 2696: 2692: 2688: 2687: 2686: 2682: 2678: 2673: 2672: 2671: 2670: 2666: 2660: 2656: 2648: 2646: 2645: 2641: 2637: 2628: 2624: 2620: 2616: 2612: 2611: 2610: 2609: 2606: 2604: 2603: 2601: 2585: 2581: 2577: 2573: 2572: 2571: 2568: 2566: 2565: 2563: 2554: 2551: 2550: 2549: 2548: 2545: 2541: 2537: 2533: 2532: 2531: 2530: 2527: 2525: 2524: 2522: 2513: 2509: 2505: 2497: 2495: 2493: 2489: 2485: 2481: 2477: 2467: 2465: 2464: 2460: 2456: 2451: 2450: 2441: 2439: 2438: 2434: 2430: 2425: 2424: 2420: 2416: 2410: 2409: 2405: 2401: 2394: 2390: 2386: 2382: 2381: 2380: 2379: 2375: 2371: 2363: 2361: 2360: 2356: 2352: 2347: 2343: 2336: 2334: 2333: 2330: 2327: 2321: 2313: 2305: 2301: 2297: 2292: 2290: 2286: 2282: 2277: 2276: 2275: 2271: 2267: 2262: 2261: 2260: 2259: 2256: 2252: 2248: 2243: 2242: 2241: 2240: 2236: 2232: 2224: 2220: 2216: 2212: 2208: 2204: 2200: 2196: 2192: 2191: 2190: 2189: 2185: 2181: 2176: 2168: 2166: 2164: 2161:was added at 2160: 2154: 2150: 2143: 2140:Responded on 2139: 2138: 2137: 2135: 2127: 2121: 2117: 2113: 2109: 2105: 2103: 2099: 2095: 2091: 2087: 2086: 2085: 2084: 2081: 2077: 2073: 2068: 2067: 2066: 2065: 2061: 2057: 2051: 2050: 2046: 2042: 2038: 2037:Good Articles 2034: 2030: 2022: 2020: 2019: 2015: 2011: 2006: 1989: 1985: 1981: 1976: 1975: 1974: 1970: 1966: 1962: 1961: 1960: 1956: 1952: 1948: 1947: 1946: 1942: 1938: 1934: 1933: 1932: 1928: 1924: 1920: 1919: 1918: 1914: 1910: 1905: 1904: 1903: 1902: 1898: 1894: 1889: 1881: 1877: 1874: 1873: 1852: 1849: 1848: 1847: 1846: 1842: 1838: 1828: 1827: 1823: 1822: 1817: 1811: 1805: 1801: 1799: 1798:76.195.219.53 1795: 1789: 1785: 1781: 1770: 1764: 1760: 1756: 1752: 1748: 1743: 1742: 1741: 1740: 1737: 1726: 1724: 1723: 1719: 1715: 1711: 1704: 1697: 1696:its talk page 1693: 1689: 1685: 1681: 1674: 1663: 1657: 1654: 1652: 1651: 1648: 1647: 1626: 1622: 1619:I have moved 1614: 1612: 1611: 1607: 1603: 1595: 1589: 1585: 1581: 1577: 1573: 1572: 1571: 1567: 1563: 1559: 1555: 1554: 1551: 1547: 1543: 1538: 1537: 1532: 1528: 1524: 1520: 1516: 1511: 1510: 1509: 1505: 1501: 1496: 1495: 1494: 1493: 1489: 1485: 1481: 1477: 1468: 1464: 1460: 1457: 1453: 1452: 1451: 1450: 1446: 1442: 1438: 1430: 1428: 1427: 1423: 1419: 1411: 1410:Myra Hemmings 1408: 1404: 1400: 1396: 1391: 1387: 1383: 1379: 1375: 1371: 1370:Marjorie Hill 1367: 1363: 1359: 1354: 1350: 1347: 1342: 1341: 1340: 1336: 1332: 1331: 1326: 1325: 1324: 1323: 1320: 1316: 1312: 1308: 1307: 1306: 1305: 1301: 1297: 1293: 1286: 1283: 1279: 1278: 1277: 1276: 1272: 1270: 1262: 1259: 1251: 1247: 1243: 1242: 1236: 1233: 1232: 1231: 1227: 1223: 1222: 1217: 1213: 1212: 1211: 1210: 1209: 1208: 1205: 1204: 1199: 1195: 1187: 1185: 1184: 1181: 1173: 1171: 1170: 1167: 1162: 1153: 1149: 1145: 1141: 1136: 1132: 1131: 1130: 1129: 1125: 1121: 1116: 1115:Chief Osceola 1110: 1109: 1106: 1102: 1098: 1094: 1090: 1082: 1078: 1075: 1074: 1067: 1066: 1065: 1064: 1061: 1060: 1053: 1045: 1043: 1042: 1039: 1033: 1025: 1023: 1022: 1019: 1014: 1013: 1010: 1003:POV Statement 1002: 998: 995: 990: 989: 984: 983: 982: 981: 978: 974: 966: 962: 959: 954: 953: 952: 951: 948: 939: 937: 936: 933: 931: 911: 907: 900: 897:Revision and 896: 894: 893: 889: 885: 881: 874: 873:John bambenek 871: 865: 864: 861: 857: 856: 846: 845: 841: 840: 838: 834: 833: 829: 828: 822: 818: 815: 810: 809: 808: 807: 804: 796: 786: 783: 782:Corvus cornix 779: 775: 774: 773: 770: 765: 764: 763: 760: 759:Corvus cornix 756: 755: 754: 751: 746: 745: 744: 743: 740: 739:Corvus cornix 734: 733: 730: 729:Corvus cornix 725: 724: 721: 720:Corvus cornix 708: 705: 701: 696: 695: 694: 691: 690:Corvus cornix 687: 683: 682: 681: 678: 674: 669: 665: 662: 661: 660: 657: 656:Corvus cornix 653: 649: 645: 644: 643: 642: 639: 638:Corvus cornix 635: 628: 625: 623: 622: 619: 611: 609: 605: 604: 603: 597: 595: 594: 591: 587: 578: 576: 575: 572: 570: 552: 549: 544: 539: 538: 535: 532: 525: 520: 519: 516: 507: 505: 504: 501: 497: 493: 489: 485: 484:Jonti Picking 477: 476:Jonti Picking 474: 470: 467: 463: 459: 458: 457: 456: 453: 435: 430: 428: 423: 421: 416: 415: 413: 412: 405: 402: 400: 397: 396: 390: 389: 382: 379: 377: 374: 372: 369: 367: 364: 362: 359: 357: 354: 352: 349: 347: 344: 342: 339: 337: 334: 333: 327: 326: 319: 316: 314: 311: 309: 306: 304: 301: 300: 294: 293: 286: 283: 281: 278: 276: 273: 271: 268: 266: 263: 262: 256: 255: 248: 245: 244: 238: 237: 230: 227: 225: 222: 220: 217: 215: 212: 210: 207: 205: 202: 200: 197: 195: 192: 190: 187: 185: 182: 180: 177: 176: 170: 169: 160: 156: 152: 151: 146: 143: 139: 138: 132: 130: 129: 126: 122: 114: 112: 111: 108: 103: 102: 99: 95: 90: 89: 86: 82: 74: 68: 65: 62: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 2962: 2920: 2915: 2847: 2800: 2784:SexyNupe2000 2781: 2770:SexyNupe2000 2766: 2755:SexyNupe2000 2752: 2741:SexyNupe2000 2738: 2730: 2652: 2632: 2595: 2594: 2592: 2557: 2556: 2516: 2515: 2501: 2471: 2452: 2445: 2426: 2411: 2397: 2367: 2348: 2344: 2340: 2317: 2228: 2193:They failed 2172: 2146: 2132:The article 2131: 2090:Serial comma 2052: 2027:The article 2026: 2002: 1885: 1855: 1833: 1815: 1812: 1803: 1802: 1787: 1783: 1782: 1730: 1667: 1629: 1618: 1615:Moving pages 1599: 1471: 1434: 1414: 1389: 1366:Alice Murray 1328: 1291: 1289: 1265: 1239: 1219: 1215: 1202: 1191: 1177: 1157: 1154:Fellow Greek 1134: 1111: 1100: 1092: 1086: 1069: 1055: 1049: 1029: 1015: 1006: 970: 943: 913: 903: 877: 854: 849: 842: 800: 777: 735: 726: 717: 633: 631: 615: 601: 582: 554: 547: 540: 521: 511: 481: 449: 336:Coordinators 275:Using images 209:New articles 159:members page 148: 118: 104: 91: 78: 60: 43: 37: 2994:Justinm1978 2946:Justinm1978 2893:Justinm1978 2851:—Preceding 2819:—Preceding 2716:Justinm1978 2677:Justinm1978 2615:Justinm1978 2576:Justinm1978 2536:Justinm1978 2508:Allstarecho 2474:—Preceding 2429:H.al-shawaf 2415:H.al-shawaf 2400:H.al-shawaf 2385:Justinm1978 2370:H.al-shawaf 2351:H.al-shawaf 2281:Justinm1978 2247:Justinm1978 2211:Justinm1978 2180:H.al-shawaf 2169:Gerald Duff 2157:—Preceding 2072:Justinm1978 2010:Justinm1978 1965:Justinm1978 1937:Justinm1978 1909:Justinm1978 1837:Justinm1978 1523:Justinm1978 1484:Justinm1978 1395:Tim Vickers 1374:Tim Vickers 1346:Justinm1978 1311:Tim Vickers 1296:Tim Vickers 1282:Justinm1978 1180:HistoricDST 1140:Justinm1978 1026:MedCab Case 958:Justinm1978 769:Justinm1978 750:Justinm1978 704:Justinm1978 677:Justinm1978 393:Task forces 376:Peer review 36:This is an 2480:Victor8698 2199:WP:NOTABLE 1198:disruptive 1050:is listed 986:paragraph. 912:. Thanks. 910:revert war 371:V1.0 Index 351:Assessment 308:Categories 115:Eagle list 2879:Bajenkins 2857:Bajenkins 2699:Dreadstar 2659:Dreadstar 2629:UIUC edit 2203:talk page 2178:disagree. 2153:talk page 2142:talk page 2033:nominated 2031:has been 1794:Autoblock 1786:has been 1188:Reverting 1101:vandalism 748:deleted. 618:Jimfbleak 318:Userboxes 313:Templates 303:Resources 259:Processes 219:Todo list 67:Archive 2 61:Archive 1 2941:notebook 2909:You and 2865:contribs 2853:unsigned 2833:contribs 2825:Nolephin 2821:unsigned 2804:Nolephin 2649:Campfire 2488:contribs 2476:unsigned 2455:Spinkava 2449:Spinkava 2314:SSP case 1978:officer? 1765:Unblock! 1735:lucasbfr 1515:WP:CIVIL 1105:Upholder 855:Turnbull 853:Nicholas 590:Honbicot 214:Requests 155:Scouting 133:Scouting 2911:Miranda 2735:Revert? 2695:uncivil 2514:. -- 2498:Userbox 2159:comment 2108:however 1788:granted 1751:Alatari 1576:WP:LAME 1562:Alan.ca 1542:Alan.ca 1500:Alan.ca 1459:Alan.ca 1441:Alan.ca 1203:Miranda 1135:because 1072:Miranda 1058:Miranda 994:MSJapan 977:MSJapan 906:WP:TALK 899:WP:TALK 500:Mithent 341:Members 297:Indexes 39:archive 2987:WP:LOC 2655:WP:AGF 2512:WP:MFD 2325:Rudget 2296:Naraht 2266:Naraht 2231:Naraht 2094:Naraht 1980:Naraht 1951:Naraht 1923:Naraht 1893:Naraht 860:(talk) 803:Naraht 466:Rlevse 452:Rlevse 229:Portal 125:Rlevse 107:Naraht 98:Naraht 85:Naraht 2970:(Ni!) 2928:(Ni!) 2636:Bvjrm 2320:there 2264:page? 2151:wiki 2112:Ccson 2056:Ccson 2041:2much 1714:BJBot 1519:WP:PA 1480:WP:PA 1418:RMHED 1390:might 1269:A. B. 1194:PRODS 1133:It's 904:Per, 814:Ccson 515:Ccson 241:Style 189:Scope 16:< 2998:talk 2963:Kwsn 2950:talk 2921:Kwsn 2897:talk 2883:talk 2861:talk 2829:talk 2808:talk 2788:talk 2774:talk 2759:talk 2745:talk 2720:talk 2691:this 2681:talk 2640:talk 2619:talk 2580:talk 2555:. -- 2540:talk 2484:talk 2459:talk 2433:talk 2419:talk 2404:talk 2389:talk 2374:talk 2355:talk 2300:talk 2285:talk 2270:talk 2251:talk 2235:talk 2215:talk 2197:and 2195:WP:V 2184:talk 2116:talk 2106:See 2098:talk 2076:talk 2060:talk 2045:talk 2035:for 2014:talk 1984:talk 1969:talk 1955:talk 1941:talk 1927:talk 1913:talk 1897:talk 1841:talk 1755:talk 1718:talk 1703:prod 1690:and 1673:prod 1606:talk 1584:talk 1566:talk 1546:talk 1527:talk 1517:and 1504:talk 1488:talk 1463:talk 1445:talk 1422:talk 1399:talk 1378:talk 1368:and 1360:and 1335:talk 1315:talk 1300:talk 1246:talk 1226:talk 1144:talk 1124:talk 1052:here 1032:here 973:here 967:RFCU 797:Yay! 700:WP:V 673:WP:V 668:WP:V 664:WP:V 652:WP:V 648:WP:V 608:here 534:acan 2155:. 1820:man 1809:Mr. 1796:of 1623:to 1330:DGG 1241:DGG 1221:DGG 1216:all 688:. 566:Tam 528:coe 478:AfD 3000:) 2952:) 2899:) 2885:) 2867:) 2863:• 2835:) 2831:• 2810:) 2790:) 2776:) 2761:) 2747:) 2722:) 2683:) 2642:) 2621:) 2605:- 2596:— 2582:) 2567:- 2558:— 2542:) 2526:- 2517:— 2490:) 2486:• 2461:) 2435:) 2421:) 2406:) 2391:) 2376:) 2357:) 2302:) 2287:) 2272:) 2253:) 2237:) 2217:) 2186:) 2118:) 2100:) 2078:) 2062:) 2047:) 2016:) 1986:) 1971:) 1957:) 1943:) 1929:) 1915:) 1899:) 1867:nd 1861:ir 1853:. 1843:) 1816:Z- 1757:) 1720:) 1706:}} 1700:{{ 1676:}} 1670:{{ 1641:nd 1635:ir 1608:) 1586:) 1568:) 1548:) 1529:) 1506:) 1490:) 1465:) 1447:) 1424:) 1401:) 1380:) 1337:) 1317:) 1302:) 1248:) 1228:) 1146:) 1126:) 929:da 917:Mi 890:— 888:AA 858:| 778:am 702:? 588:. 562:Bo 558:Ro 161:. 96:? 2996:( 2948:( 2895:( 2881:( 2859:( 2827:( 2806:( 2786:( 2772:( 2757:( 2743:( 2718:( 2704:† 2679:( 2664:† 2638:( 2617:( 2578:( 2538:( 2482:( 2457:( 2431:( 2417:( 2402:( 2387:( 2372:( 2353:( 2329:. 2298:( 2283:( 2268:( 2249:( 2233:( 2213:( 2182:( 2114:( 2096:( 2074:( 2058:( 2043:( 2012:( 1982:( 1967:( 1953:( 1939:( 1925:( 1911:( 1895:( 1870:a 1864:a 1858:m 1839:( 1778:Y 1753:( 1716:( 1644:a 1638:a 1632:m 1604:( 1582:( 1580:B 1564:( 1544:( 1525:( 1502:( 1486:( 1461:( 1443:( 1420:( 1397:( 1376:( 1333:( 1313:( 1298:( 1244:( 1224:( 1142:( 1122:( 926:n 923:a 920:r 550:. 530:l 464:. 433:e 426:t 419:v 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.