Knowledge

User talk:K of the net

Source 📝

189:
Again, please don't "stuff" the article with lots of court cases, only list the ones whose ultimate outcome either directly affected society the most (e.g. precedent-setting appellate- or Supreme-Court-level cases) or those which affected the company the most. You can put additional court cases on
133:
Please compile the court cases together and write a coherent paragraph, and limit yourself to the 2 or 3 court cases whose outcomes were the most "important." List the remaining ones on the article's talk page.
175:
Note: The examples above are surrounded with "nowiki" so the WikiCode shows. When used properly, without the "nowiki," they will display properly. See
150:{{cite court |litigants=Brown v. Board of Education |vol= |reporter= |opinion= |pinpoint= |court= |date= |url= |accessdate= |quote=}}</ref: --> 71:
one isn't really positive for the project. If you have a problem with any of my edits to the article, please be specific, and/or report me to eg.
202: 117: 49: 101:
If you have an axe to grind as it relates to a company's off-wiki behavior, please keep it off-wiki. Edits like
25:. I also opened a discussion on the article's talk page recommending that the link be removed altogether. See 37:
does not operate in that country, the link to Labour brokering in the "See also" section is not appropriate.
88: 179: 26: 198: 113: 45: 84: 30: 76: 80: 61: 34: 33:, this refers to a very specific labor practice that happens in South Africa. Since 22: 191: 106: 83:
and contribute to articles instead of trying to accuse other editors of bad faith!
72: 38: 149:
Important civil rights cases include ''Brown. v. Board of Education'',<ref: -->
137:
Also, the best ways to list court cases in an article is either "in-line" as in:
208: 123: 91: 55: 102: 68: 67:Hi there! Please keep in mind that edits such as 105:are not helpful in building an encyclopedia. 21:I made clerical fixes to your recent edit to 8: 141:Important civil rights cases include ''''... 97:Please keep things on a professional level 185:for instructions on using that template. 159:Important civil rights cases include: 7: 27:Talk:Skilled Group#Labour brokering 14: 1: 224: 124:21:40, 31 March 2014 (UTC) 92:22:21, 30 March 2014 (UTC) 56:20:35, 30 March 2014 (UTC) 129:Skilled Group court cases 209:17:20, 2 June 2014 (UTC) 190:the article talk page. 145:In-line, as a citation: 75:. If not, please be 207: 206: 122: 121: 81:assume good faith 54: 53: 215: 196: 195: 184: 178: 111: 110: 43: 42: 31:Labour brokering 29:. According to 223: 222: 218: 217: 216: 214: 213: 212: 182: 176: 131: 99: 65: 19: 12: 11: 5: 221: 219: 172: 171: 170: 169: 166: 163: 153: 152: 143: 142: 130: 127: 98: 95: 64: 59: 18: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 220: 211: 210: 204: 200: 193: 187: 186: 181: 167: 164: 161: 160: 158: 157: 156: 148: 147: 146: 140: 139: 138: 135: 128: 126: 125: 119: 115: 108: 104: 96: 94: 93: 90: 86: 82: 78: 74: 70: 63: 60: 58: 57: 51: 47: 40: 36: 35:Skilled Group 32: 28: 24: 23:Skilled Group 17:Skilled Group 16: 188: 174: 173: 154: 144: 136: 132: 100: 66: 20: 155:As a list: 85:Bjelleklang 180:cite court 203:contribs 118:contribs 50:contribs 192:davidwr 162:''''... 107:davidwr 39:davidwr 62:WP:AGF 77:civil 73:WP:AN 199:talk 151:.... 114:talk 103:this 89:talk 69:this 46:talk 201:)/( 168:... 165:... 116:)/( 87:- 48:)/( 183:}} 177:{{ 79:, 205:) 197:( 194:/ 120:) 112:( 109:/ 52:) 44:( 41:/

Index

Skilled Group
Talk:Skilled Group#Labour brokering
Labour brokering
Skilled Group
davidwr
talk
contribs
20:35, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
WP:AGF
this
WP:AN
civil
assume good faith
Bjelleklang
talk
22:21, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
this
davidwr
talk
contribs
21:40, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
cite court
davidwr
talk
contribs
17:20, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.