1469:
variety of available topics, its objectivity, and differing perspectives along with loads of information not covered within
Encyclopedia Brittanica. However, I have unfortunately began to question the disadvantages of this platform as I and my peers have witnessed a certain clique of people whom allow their biases to effect their decisions pertaining to the writing of articles. I have written a paragraph for you under the topic Hello in this page concerning the attacks you have received on the basis of ORIGINAL research and the necessity for published articles as references. This is hogwash and as a succesful and continuing member of the academic community (research institutes and universities) I apologize if you have taken or have been forced to accept these fallacious corrections. They are worng and what those participants of ORIGINAL research and published articles have asserted is not only wrong but disgusting and a bit hillarious according to one of my peers. History is the process of making a story based on facts. If you can provide credible and significant facts, then your history is fine. If your facts are more credible and significant, then proponents of history are compelled if they are true members of the preceding category to change their views. This is the linking formula that keeps history from deteriorating into the common cliches of "his-story" and the winners write history. If a thesis or dissertation can be accepted by an academic community when at times those aforementioned communication means of the "paradigm" are ORIGINAL or based on unpublished sources, then why cant they be published in Knowledge (XXG)? Are we not to think here, or are we to just write. Because if we are to just write , then please forgive me and give my 7 year-old daughter a job because she writes well for her age. My purpose is to hopefully make you aware that you are receiving critics that are terribly wrong. I dont know who you are but it is unconscionable for any of the assertions or attacks against your efforts to be taken seriously. If you need help in refuting these attacks I would be more than willing to provide sources and letters from esteemed professors of reputable institutions to support what I am saying because this is ridiculous and intolerable. I wouldnt question if your critics are right, I would question their motives or ascertain as to whether they were horribly misinformed. PLease keep contributing to Knowledge (XXG), I dont know much of about what you have written but if you are criticised for nothing , then obviously someone or some people have their own problems and are taking it out on you because for some reason they were predispositioned to believe something about you or what you say is axiomatic to label you as opposition. I give my support for you. Sincerely.
1407:
Reputable published sources are not necessary for academic integrity, if the person who wrote the above paragraph has ever taken a graduate course in historiography and paid attention about the 'displinary matrix' and as a result the 'disciplinary nexus" of history and its approach to evaluating and asserting stories from facts was at one time controlled by academic superiors. In other words, until recently, history has been written under the supervision of reputable historians such as professors with one of their primary goals to be to control the thought and perspectives of its students. This has changed now. Diverse appraoches and perspectives are now being allowed within the scholarly community (whether popular or not) because too much controlling of information by professors of the past left those students vulnerable to different perspectives supported by facts. In other words , students were made to look stupid by others because someone else with a different perspective supplied a different view with just as credible and significant or even more credible and significant facts. Whomever wrote this above paragraph doesnt knwo what they are talking about and if you ever take my class, I will guarantee you will fail miserably because this is one of the emphasized points within historiography needed to be learned. Have you ever heard of the saying that the story of custard and the western days werent written by Native
Americans? So , if you rely on published accounts within the US, who wrote them? Are you really getting the truth, or the American truth? In order to sufficently be an expert or erudite of a historical topic, learn various perspectives, otherwise remember what I have written here, because I promise whether you like it or not, you will look real bad one day as a result of this. This is what seperates a dilettente and a professional historian. Credibility is EVERYTHING and if you only rely or study one perspective, your credibility is in danger of being attacked by a different perspective.
1546:
methodology and logic applied by professional historians make them superior to the amateurs. We can not ignore amateurs of history because by doing so would ignore viewpoints which may catch up with us and bite us in the _ _ _, yet I have witnessed amateurs within
Knowledge (XXG) that because of their lack of objectivity and approach in evaluating history provide opportuniites for us professionals to tear their infant attempts apart. Because you have a more open mind then your critics, this is what we want within the scholarly and graduate community. We are tired of timid and mythological stories based on chauvinistic perspectives. Because of your open minded approach, you have better chances then these dilettantes and I urge you to consider furtheing your interests in the field of professional history. If you need halp , respond to any paragraphs I have written. Thank you for your different and open-minded ORIGINAL contributions to Knowledge (XXG). Hopefully, they will promote good stock such as yourself amongst their constituents.
456:
For that reason the
Republic of Korea had abstained. His Government was providing humanitarian assistance to the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea while encouraging its move towards more openness and towards improving its human rights situation. Noting the international community’s concerns, he said he expected the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea would faithfully implement the international human rights convention it had voluntarily joined. He also called on that country’s officials to engage in constructive dialogue and cooperation with the international community
1326:
important in Yamato-period Japan, and insist that these ancient documents alone are sufficient to prove that
Chinese immigrants were more important. However, you fail to reference any modern source that might either 1) agree with this point, and thereby back up your argument, or 2) explain these circumstances in any greater detail based on more recent archaeology and / or other viewpoints expressed in ancient documents. This failure to include any other references is what makes your content "original research", as it is
290:; that had been approved in December, 2004. As a result, the politician who had the network with Japan was lost one after another. Therefore, the communication of South Korea and Japan is more difficult. Because Japanese Government doesn't approve the demand of the South Korea government, the South Korea government is not doing an intergovernmental exchange now. Therefore, the relation between South Korea and Japan is cooled fast.
1283:"No original research" does not mean that experts on a specific topic cannot contribute to Knowledge (XXG). On the contrary, Knowledge (XXG) welcomes experts. We assume, however, that someone is an expert not only because of their personal and direct knowledge of a topic, but also because of their knowledge of published sources on a topic. This policy prohibits expert editors from drawing on their personal and direct knowledge
1748:
502:- this is your 2nd warning regarding this article. The article is about Germany and Japan's responses to crimes they have committed during WWII, and the Korean part deals with the crimes they have committed in Korea during WWII ( and colonial period ) and their apology, compensation, and criticisms received. I have amply warned you. Please cease and desist your POV edits to Korea-related articles.
961:
propaganda is still a translation of propaganda, and accurately understanding that propaganda (either in the source or target languages) is impossible without also understanding the whole context, including alternate views. So again, translation of ancient documents alone, even if correct, does not suffice. This is why other editors keep asking for other sources, particularly academic sources.
900:. Instead, to make an article credible, there is a requirement from academic sources, preferably in English. No one is rejecting translations of Chinese into English. However, your subjective interpretation can be rejected because it is original research. Your claims would have more merit if you can cite an academic commentary on the ancient sources, not the original material itself.
517:
1303:. They must cite reliable, third-party publications and may not use their unpublished knowledge, which would be impossible to verify. We hope expert editors will draw on their knowledge of published sources to enrich our articles, bearing in mind that specialists do not occupy a privileged position within Knowledge (XXG).
1545:
I dont know if you are a part of the adademic (institution) community in so far as being a professor or graduate student, but I would like to suggest that you partake in this venture. As we all learn in historiography, the interpretations of professional historians may not be accepted widely, but the
1468:
I am an avid public audience of
Knowledge (XXG) and have wished nothing but positive things for this platform. I have even gone along with suggesting to others withim my academic community that Knowledge (XXG) is a good scholarly source. In fact better than Encyclopedia Britannica because of its wide
1325:
Regarding translations, translations of ancient documents alone to make a point is problematic if you do not also include other sources that make that same point. For instance, you point to the
Shinsen Shōjiroku, Nihongi, and other ancient writings as evidence that Chinese immigrants were much more
659:
4) Right now your complaints seem to be organizational complaints (and I agree they can be made to flow better) and citation complaints (of which I think you have the burden to provide credible, English citations because I already have done so). If you can agree those are the problems and I am not
381:
These tasks will not be easy to achieve. It is not only a tough but also uncomfortable thing to try to find fault with and point fingers at others. The two countries may confront each other more often than they did. It could also be very embarrassing to quarrel with each other for the whole world to
733:
3) Just because a source disagrees with what your interpretation of ancient sources is does not make it wrong. Can you understand that people can have differing interpretation of ancient sources, etc.? While you claim that people have been reverting your edits without reason, that claim is wrong
431:
canceled the summit in South Korea and Japan in
December, 2005. Commision on Human Rights clarified an intimacy in North Korea and a diplomatic war to Japan in South Korea with South Korea. 2005/04/07､South Korea united with North Korea and did the complaint to the history education of Japan. South
1549:
Also, I noticed that some one within the My Lai massacre page made the statement that
Koreans partook in the Vietnam War while the Japanese got rich off of it. This follows the comment about Japanese brutality in Korea during World War II. However, what is so idiotic about that whole mparagraph is
1513:
Please be aware that
Knowledge (XXG) is not just a resource, it is also a community. Part of the opposition Kamosuke has faced has been due to Kamosuke inadvertently acting against the norms of this community -- a kind of culture clash. I too sincerely hope that Kamosuke continues to contribute,
896:
4) Knowledge (XXG) policy requires that we cite verifiable material from reputable sources. Your subjective interpretation of ancient sources is not good enough. Think about it, if any one could just interpret things the way they want then anyone could anything they want to Knowledge (XXG). No
455:
In a general statement after the vote, the representative of the Republic of Korea said his country was making efforts to achieve advances in the human rights situation in the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, and those efforts were being pursued in the framework of cooperation and openness.
203:
because China had supported North Korea in 1951. However, South Korea and China connected the diplomatic relation on August 24, 1992. After that, China became the most intimate country for South Korea though a South Korea government and a Chinese government conflicted over the occupational health
1684:
article are full of grammatical mistakes, which could be a minor problem, but is not, in this case. Another user had shortened the "Japanese occupation" section, arguing that the article is an overview, and obviously, you overlooked the comment, in the discussion section. Can you please make any
1255:
Editors often make the mistake of thinking that if A is published by a reliable source, and B is published by a reliable source, then A and B can be joined together in an article in order to advance position C. However, this would be an example of a new synthesis of published material serving to
546:
Hi Kamosuke. The book "Togo Heihachiro. Visual account of the Meiji Navy" doesn't have an ISBN, but you can purchase at the Togo Shrine in Harajuku. Please also search Google with the phrase: 自分は李舜臣将軍には遠く及ばない. By the way, I am having a hard time understanding your prose, as well as your position
1633:
the one who nominated the redirect for deletion. My only involvement has been to close a misguided redirect deletion request. RFD was not the place to bring this argument. Saying "this is not the place to fight, go fight over there" is not the same as picking a side in the fight. I have made no
1223:
is a term used on Knowledge (XXG) to refer to material added to articles by Knowledge (XXG) editors that has not been published already by a reputable source. In this context it means unpublished theories, data, statements, concepts, arguments, and ideas; or any new interpretation, analysis, or
1823:
A secret tea party was being held, and all those invited were passing around a cup of tea. As Otani Yoshitsugu took a sip, some pus from his face dropped into the cup. Yoshitsugu discovered this, but too late: the cup was already being passed around. The people who took sips after this all had
1406:
There is nothing wrong with original work. In fact I may find more value in original work because it isnt tainted with nationalism, racism, and all those other predispositioned biases taught to us at early ages. Albert Einstein - "Common sense is a collection of prejudices acquired by age 18".
960:
Again, this issue depends on the interpretation not just of the source texts themselves, but of the whole context surrounding the documents, including the politics of the times and archaeological evidence discovered since those documents were written. For example, an accurate translation of
590:
rule for this article, which would cause an automatic block on your account. I urge you to discuss on the Talk page before removing the content again. As you seem to be Japanese, judging from your user page, I suggest you look at the Talk pages as good opportunities for 根回し. Thank you,
464:
South Korea abstained from the human rights resolution of North Korea by the reason "The human rights policy of North Korea is evaluated". South Korea and North Korea jointly proposed the history education of Japan to Commision on Human Rights. Please think about this fact well again.
1444:
On a side note, it's very much appreciated (and it makes discussion threads much easier to read) if you sign your posts. Simply add four tildes at the end of your post like this: ~~~~ This will add your username (or IP if you're not logged in), and the date and time. Thanks!
386:. And that may adversely affect exchanges in economic, social, cultural and various other sectors, especially causing concern about possible economic difficulties. But we do not have to worry too much about it. I believe that we are capable of enduring a great many difficulties.
1665:
for more information. You will need to be very careful about your statements going forward. Should you make another unfounded accusation that I "falsify" sources, I will have no choice but to report you immediately. I promise you I shall not be so forgiving the next time. Thank
448:
Let's think easily. Contrasted activity of South Korea in Commision on Human Rights. South Korea abused "History education of Japan". South Korea abandoned "Human rights resolution of North Korea". (Please look at the source. ) Commonsensibly, what does this result show?
348:
A Chinese government also examined official information on the South Korea government. However, neither South Korea nor China are mentioning this problem. It is necessary to delete the description without the source. For an excellent relation between China and South Korea
184:
is a nation that contributed to the establishment of the South Korea government most. The relation between the United States and South Korea was strengthened more by the military alliance in 1953. South Korea allied in the United States took an active part in the
953:またいいますが、この課題は原文だけの解釈によるのではなくて、その原文を取り巻く環境の全ての解釈によりまして、しかも当時の政治や原文が書かれた時代から発掘された考古学的な証拠もの解釈によります。例えばプロパガンダを精密に翻訳しても訳文はまだプロパガンダに過ぎません。原文か訳文かいずれを正確に理解するためにはその背景全てを、異なる意見も含めて、把握するのは不可欠です。従って、繰り返しますが、古代文献の翻訳だけでは正しくても不十分です。だからこそ「他の参考文献がほしい、とくに学問的な参考文献が」と周りの編集者が主張しています。
1434:
66.32.117.147, I understand your points, but you need to read up more on how Knowledge (XXG) operates before diving in. Knowledge (XXG) has specific policies and rules, and posting original work to Knowledge (XXG) happens to be a no-no. Please have a look at
235:, Japanese culture prohibition, and pro-Japanese sect banishment)South Korea was connected with the diplomatic relation of Japan by Park Chunghee who was the serviceman of a Japanese army. The South Korea -Japan relation temporarily became excellent by
1507:
Postings to Talk pages are not bound by this provision, but anything placed into the main article text is subject to Knowledge (XXG) policies, and if other editors find something objectionable, it is generally either changed, or at least brought up for
1094:
5) Whether you like it or not, there was Korean activity in early Japan. It is not the most important part of this part of Japan's history but it is there and it should be mentioned. I hope we can keep working together to make this article better.
1550:
that yes Japan made money off of it, but South Koreans massacred innocent Vietnamese in Binh Dinh and other villages while the Japanese didnt. This is supported by both civilian and military documents. Look at the My Lai page, I have stated this.
572:. However, this content is verified, and is also relevant within the flow of the article, and as such should not be unilaterally removed -- especially when other editors are reverting the removal. If you still have issues with the content,
1653:, kindly avoid making remarks that one might consider rude and do not make unfounded accusations towards other users. In other words, I ask you to observe civility in your comments. There is certainly no need for such behavior. Please read
193:. However, the United States and South Korea are often conflicting over the treatment to North Korea recently. However, the United States and South Korea are often conflicting when South Korea starts approaching in North Korea.
443:
There is no mention about UNHCR denoucning South Korea for "diplomatic war" on Japan. Although SK did complain about new Revionist historical textbooks in Japan, there is no mention of "SK unifying with NK to complaint to Japan"
1315:
Kamosuke, your edits have been problematic primarily due to 1) your lack of citations, making the content you added appear to be purely original, and 2) your synthesis of other material instead of quoting published reliable
708:
2) Simply quoting sources is not a customization of the source because the source says what it says and one is allowed to quote sources to back up one's assertion. That is a universal standard for using sources.
404:
But we do not have to worry too much about it. I believe that we are capable of enduring a great many difficulties. And we must be determined to bear the hardship on our shoulders if we have to for the sake of our
339:
Commonsensibly, Japanese colonial rule of Korea is not included in WW2. Therefore, I move it to an appropriate place. Basic information The South Korea annexation is 1910. (In a word, it is before World War I. )
675:
However, the editor who doesn't have the knowledge of Japan, He participates in the article to advertise Korea. He deletes an important part of the history article on Japan, and introduces Korea exaggeratedly.
1098:
Whether Korean like it or not, The South Korean only submitted a Chinese culture to Japan. And, the South Korean was not able to take an active part than Chinese. I do not deny South Korean's topic to be
863:
And what I'm saying is that just a translation is insufficient and has nothing to do with this issue. Are you fully understanding this point? I'm not trying to insult, I'm just confused by your reply.
1256:
advance a position, and as such it would constitute original research. "A and B, therefore C" is acceptable only if a reliable source has published this argument in relation to the topic of the article.
147:
Korean war crime person in WW2 The Korean war crime people are 148 people. The executed Korean war crime people are 23 people. (Hong Sa Ik) (Do UP after finding the material of an English version. )
1824:
horrified expressions on their faces, but when it came to Mitsunari's turn, he calmly drank all the remaining tea, pus and all. Yoshitsugu was amazed: "This Mitsunari is an extraordinary man!"
645:
2.2) Let me reiterate, we won't be going anywhere if you insist on your own subjective interpretation of the sources instead of citing credible, English analysis of the ancient sources.
167:
37:. I have no opinion on whether either of you is "right" or either of you is "wrong," but I would like to see the dispute resolved. If you wish to comment there, please do so. --
499:
204:
program of the imported Kimchi temporarily. (It has not been treated by the intergovernmental of the two countries as an official problem though various history issues exist. )
473:
You should supplement if you feel the lack of the support. You were not able to object if it said from the conclusion. The article based on the source was deleted for that.
1859:
705:
1) I would be happy for Eirikr to mediate. But keep in mind that consensus means everyone who is interested in the topic has a say so I can't speak for anyone but myself.
1697:大変 返事が遅くなってしまいました。すみませんでした。 最も深刻なことは 女子挺身隊ではなくて 従軍慰安婦問題そうです。。。 日本が残酷だと 思いませんですけど。 日本が残酷だと宣伝をする積もりではありません。 しかし、現代と比較すれば悲惨な時代であることは間違いないです。 現在の日本が 決して過去の日本と違うものであると 思います。
630:
The Korean prohibits translating the history article on China into English. And, the Korean prohibits translating Knowledge (XXG) of Japan. They never explain the reason.
1514:
and as part of that hope, I also look forward to him/her learning more about these community norms that s/he may contribute more effectively. As I'm sure you're aware,
432:
Korea abstained from the North Korea human rights resolution.South Koreans are angry the history education of Japan more than human-right violations of North Korea now.
239:. however, a present South Korea government is rejecting the summit with Japanese Government for the reasons that "Apology and compensation" of Japan is insufficient.
277:
A diplomatic war to Japan started from Commision on Human Rights in 2005. South Korea united with North Korea and did the complaint to the history education of Japan.
344:
Please stop with your continued and persistant POV editing on foreign relations of SOuth Korea article and stop remoing the Chinese govenrment and Goguryeo part.
988:
It is only Korean that requests, "Please give evidence that Korea ruled Japan to me". First of all, you must translate. And, it is not necessary to interpret it.
264:
South Korea is politically conflicting with Japan after the president Roh Moo Hyun spoke the possibility of diplomacy War to Japan by the speech in March, 2005.
1347:
I am not saying this to be mean. I am saying this because reputable published sources are absolutely required for the academic integrity of Knowledge (XXG).
329:
article, where you deleted the part about Japanese colonial rule of Korea saying "it is not part of WWII". Well, it was from 1910-1945, and was part of WWII.
1592:
is unrelated to what should be the correct name of the article. RFD is simply the wrong place for this. If you want the page moved, follow the directions at
307:
article, - POV claims, deleting proper citations, misinterpretation of quotes and UN resolutions, using outdated sources, etc, etc. Please read the article
365:
South Korea is politically conflicting with Japan after the president Roh Moo Hyun spoke the possibility of diplomacy War to Japan by the speech in March
1729:
Hi, I've started a new vote with the proposal I outlined beforehand. I would appreciate it if you could head on over to the talk page and vote. Thanks,
1553:
1472:
1410:
1360:
321:
Public utterances after 2005 are quoted. And, an official government is not correcting it now. In a word, your deletion reason is obviously wrong.
115:
1224:
synthesis of published data, statements, concepts, or arguments that appears to advance a position or, in the words of Knowledge (XXG)'s co-founder
897:
one is prohibiting you from translating Chinese into English. However, what you are doing is violating original research. Please read this link:
637:
2.1) On the other hand, you are insisting that western sources are "customized" to the South Korean point of view. Please explain how that is so.
1136:
1) I don't think anyone is trying to say Koreans were number one in early Japan. But, Koreans were in early Japan and that should be noted.
1058:. Are you saying then that we don't need to understand? Your line of reasoning doesn't seem very refined, but then that might just be due to my
718:
For instance, "The South Korean was the most important immigrant. " This is a childish wish of the Koreans. It is not being written in any source.
1804:
Please indicate which of your two accounts you'd like to keep (Kamosuke or HaradaSanosuke) and I'll unblock the one you wish to keep. Thanks! ···
476:
Please try objecting again by one week later about the relation between South Korea and Japan. (Without misinterpreting an official document. )
613:
1) First, do you think this conversation would be more constructive if Eirikr facilitated it in a language that you are more comfortable in?
512:
World War II and the colonialization of South Korea are another topics though said many times. It is necessary to classify it appropriately.
991:
Perhaps, I think that the Korean rejects the translation because of being being written for the fact for which the South Korean doesn't hope.
1584:: I'm not sure how clearer I could have written my closure statement & edit summary. I suggest people actually read what I wrote. The
1565:
1484:
1422:
1372:
1585:
621:
2) Secondly, I don't think there are a problem with the sources cited in the article unless you can explain to me how they are bad.
527:. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future. --
84:
54:
1328:"an example of a new synthesis of published material serving to advance a position, and as such it would constitute original research"
1151:. I provided the link in my previous message for the Knowledge (XXG) policy. Did you read it? You are in violation of that policy.
460:
Claiming that South Koreans are more angry at Japan's revionist historical textbook then DPRK human rights problem is a biased, POV,
1300:
1854:
1499:
1436:
1205:
326:
1733:
1662:
1685:
changes related to this period in the appropriate article? Then changes to the general "Korea" article can be made, I believe.
280:
1781:
1291:. If an expert editor has published the results of his or her research elsewhere, in a reputable publication, the editor can
1654:
524:
368:
363:
265:
262:
1596:. As I had nothing to do with the rename, you will have to ask your other questions to those involved. Please make use of
672:
I respect the editor who has knowledge concerning a Japanese history. (Mahal Aly has marvelous knowledge. I respect him. )
652:
I can not understand the reason why the South Korean rejects the translation of an original source. (It is easy Chinese. )
399:
You misinterpret and are writing the original. And, you are making your opinion according to the misinterpreted content.
1505:
it is nonetheless one of the basic policies of Knowledge (XXG), and all article editors here are expected to abide by it.
1770:
1593:
212:
1292:
625:
Simply, Korean customize sources. The article that the Korean customized is not corresponding to the history record.
1756:
1288:
945:
And, The Korean often falsifies the source. To point out the Korean's falsification, I quote the original source.
1634:
statement regarding what is the correct title and, not having been involved, I don't really have an opinion. --
656:
3) I agree that the organization could be better and I think both versions of "Ruling Class" can fit better.
395:
He specifically says he wants to prevent diplomatic quarrels from happening and advises the people against it.
224:
681:
I know a lot of Koreans are good editors. However, some Koreans users' edit attitudes are not respectable. --
1622:
1601:
1561:
1480:
1418:
1368:
288:
236:
469:
and unsupported view as seen on South Korean delegate's quote. I have given you ample amounts of warning.
422:
Is there no comment on the explanation of "Apology and compensation". Let's move on to the next subject.
1680:
I think it is necessary to write good or decent English to contribute. The additions you just made to the
1557:
1476:
1414:
1364:
1658:
436:
278:
1712:
577:
162:
and South Korea was conflicting over the standpoint of "Right successor in a Korean peninsula". And,
124:
93:
63:
1760:
1503:. While this policy may well be considered "hogwash" and "hillarious" in some academic circles,
1836:
1730:
1296:
391:
But I will try to manage the situation judiciously so as to prevent unbearably difficult burdens.
453:
South Korea abstained on the part that SK resolution proposed by UN because of.. exact quote :
358:. (Japanese culture openness policy etc) However, the South Korea-Japan relation is returned by
268:
257:. (Japanese culture openness policy etc) However, the South Korea-Japan relation is returned by
817:
No, I am asking for the translation of an original source. I am not questioning on your policy.
547:
against the text content. I don't think I am not particularly Korean-POV in my edits. Regards.
494:
Everything is based on an official document. Do you summarize the South Korea-Japan relation?
1698:
1694:あなたは従軍慰安婦と女子挺身隊を混同してカウントしています。この誇張は日本が残酷だと宣伝をするためのものですか？ --Kamosuke 09:32, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
1686:
1618:
1597:
232:
181:
822:
First of all, please explain the translation result to me. Afterwards, let's add information.
564:
I understand that you're not happy with the inclusion of statements by a South Korean on the
287:
Descendants of the South Korean who worked in a Japanese empire were punished by law 친일진상규명법
1529:
1452:
1393:
1070:
970:
872:
799:
598:
641:
Simply, you must look at the link. Korean doesn't accurately write the article on the link.
587:
438:
372:
again, poorly worded, he did not speak of a "Diplomacy war", if you read his exact quote,
283:
30:
1766:
1589:
1176:
1123:
692:
565:
325:
Stop making unexplained deletions on several articles regarding Korean History, including
220:
216:
211:
has the most a lot of problems. Refer to the Korean-Japanese disputes for other disputes.
171:
119:
88:
58:
1604:
instead of making assumptions. Let me know if you have any further questions. Thanks. --
664:
I regret that the quality of the history article on Japan has been lowered by the Korean.
303:
Please stop your continued and persistant POV vandalism on foreign relations section of
1831:, but I haven't been able to find any reliable source. May I ask what's your source? --
1667:
1635:
1605:
503:
485:
330:
312:
175:
1747:
1185:
Simply, please translate an original source of China. Please explain the result to me.
898:
840:私が言っているのはただの翻訳が不十分で無関係だということです。その点は完全に理解しているのでしょうか？侮辱する気はないです、ただカモスケさんの返事に混乱させられたわけです。
253:
Korea - Foreign relations (Details) The South Korea-Japan relation became intimate by
227:
for other disputes. The anti-Japanese policy was promoted to South Korea when leader
1848:
1832:
1805:
1193:
1110:
1019:」のがなくてはならないです。それでカモスケさんが言っているのは「理解しなくていい」というわけですか。カモスケさんの論理はちょっと洗練されていないみたいですが、それは自分の
682:
532:
83:
that you are interested in mediation. If you are, would you mind reaffirming that at
1345:
Without credible English-language sources, we cannot incorporate your contributions.
1722:
744:
428:
414:
359:
355:
282:
To contrasting, South Korea abstained from the North Korea human rights resolution.
271:
258:
254:
228:
34:
1188:
I think that it can do significant mutual agreement if you participate in the edit
633:
First, please define Koreans' POV. Koreans'rule is often changed without consent.
1523:
1446:
1387:
1225:
1064:
964:
939:
932:
866:
793:
592:
481:
304:
186:
166:
occurred in 1950. However, South Korea and North Korea approached rapidly after
159:
1140:
I am explaining that I should think about the priority level and the importance
649:
First of all, please translate the record of the history of China into English.
1650:
1147:
2) Interpretation/Translation, regardless you're missing the obvious point.
516:
417:
is requesting the agreement of a diplomatic war from the South Korea people.
376:
He is officially speaking "Diplomatic war". (Refer to a red character part. )
200:
163:
80:
918:
This is an important question that proves your history knowledge and policy.
480:
Please cease and desist your POV, deliberate fact-misinterprating edits to
231:
of the South Korea independence movement assumed the presidency in 1948. (
734:
as well because you have been provided links with Knowledge (XXG) policy.
1343:. If you would be kind enough to do so, we can begin to work with you.
715:
Korean is criticized to add the article that doesn't exist in the source.
548:
528:
190:
38:
1840:
1810:
1715:
1701:
1689:
1670:
1638:
1608:
1569:
1534:
1488:
1457:
1426:
1398:
1376:
1196:
1179:
1126:
1113:
1075:
975:
877:
804:
695:
685:
603:
551:
536:
506:
488:
333:
315:
132:
101:
71:
41:
778:
Pardon me for interrupting. The "interpretation" here is not as in
1228:, would amount to a "novel narrative or historical interpretation."
660:
misunderstanding you, I am happy to help work towards a consensus.
568:
page, as evidenced by your repeated removal of the content such as
170:
in June, 2000 had been done. Two Koreas are participating from the
1681:
1341:
what you need to do is provide credible English-language citations
931:
differing interpretation? No, it is an accurate translation. And,
208:
196:
274:
canceled the summit in South Korea and Japan in December, 2005.
308:
586:
deleting again. I'm afraid you're very close to violating the
1625:
instead of making assumptions. I did not start anything. I am
790:, translation unfortunately has almost nothing to do with it.
1330:
and would therefore be unacceptable here on Knowledge (XXG).
515:
267:
South Korea and Japan promised the biannual summit in 2004.
1386:
I hope this helps clarify the issues somewhat. Thank you,
1192:
activity with the knowledge of the history of Japan. :-) --
1173:
What you need to do is provide credible English citations
1828:
1793:
1789:
1785:
569:
523:
You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the
223:(Dokdo in Korean, Takeshima in Japanese). Refer to the
168:
North-South presidential summit corruption allegations
114:
Thanks for the reply! Please direct your attention to
500:
Responses of Germany and Japan to World War II crimes
1518:
you say something is often at least as important as
1357:No you are saying this to handicap the opposition.
1350:
ja translations to follow later if deemed necessary.
678:
After it agrees with Mr. Eirikr, I want to edit it.
1109:However, please think about the priority level. --
354:The South Korea-Japan relation became intimate by
57:whether you are interested in mediation. Thanks!
740:Please translate. This is not difficult Chinese.
1860:Knowledge (XXG) sockpuppets of HaradaSanosuke
712:I am not denying the quotation of the source.
8:
1050:we translate? Furthermore, there can be no
915:I am requesting only the translation result.
743:興死，弟武立，自稱使持節、都督倭百濟新羅任那加羅秦韓慕韓七國諸軍事、安東大將軍、倭國王
327:Germany and Japan's response to World War II
311:before considering your actions. Thank you!
116:Knowledge (XXG):Requests for mediation/Korea
85:Knowledge (XXG):Requests for mediation#Korea
1339:As I and other editors have stated before,
1742:
498:Please stop deleting the Korean part from
178:in the entrance ceremony as one country.
362:in the age of "Apology and compensation".
261:in the age of "Apology and compensation".
33:regarding the dispute you're having with
737:interpretation? No, it is a translation.
249:Relation between Japan and South Korea
7:
1500:Knowledge (XXG):No original research
1437:Knowledge (XXG):No original research
1206:Knowledge (XXG):No original research
158:Korea - Foreign relations (Summary)
1820:Hi. I just read this amazin story:
1663:Knowledge (XXG):No personal attacks
786:. Inasmuch as this has to do with
759:遮って、失礼します。ここでの "interpretation" は「
668:5) Let me know what you think.
14:
1655:Knowledge (XXG):Assume good faith
1806:
1746:
1629:the one who renamed it and I am
1617:: As I said, please make use of
576:bring it up on the Talk page at
299:Diplomatic policy of South Korea
199:and South Korea were hostile to
1594:Knowledge (XXG):Requested moves
935:is a history document of Korea.
383:
143:Description under preparation
79:Kamosuke, it appears from the
1:
617:Yes. I welcome his mediation.
72:01:40, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
42:09:50, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
1615:Duplicated from my talk page
1582:Duplicated from my talk page
1011:ごめんなさいが、何で翻訳しなければなりませんか？また、「
537:11:02, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
507:07:51, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
489:08:15, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
334:07:26, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
316:07:13, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
133:16:31, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
102:00:50, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
1855:Knowledge (XXG) sockpuppets
1168:History is interpretation.
382:see.There could be a tough
213:Sea of Japan naming dispute
1876:
1841:22:43, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
1811:22:02, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
1676:English + article history
1155:It is your Interpretation.
604:04:35, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
580:and cultivate a consensus
154:Korea - Foreign relations
1755:This user is a confirmed
1734:14:53, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
1716:00:05, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
1702:22:39, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
1690:14:24, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
1671:07:52, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
771:であるかぎり、翻訳は残念ながらほとんど無関係です。
552:14:04, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
219:visits, and ownership of
1829:added by you in may 2006
1739:Blocked for sockpuppetry
1659:Knowledge (XXG):Civility
1639:15:05, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
1609:13:54, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
1570:20:34, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
1535:17:07, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
1489:20:18, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
1458:16:10, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
1427:19:57, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
1377:19:57, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
1144:degree of the episode.
1056:interpreting the meaning
788:interpreting the meaning
561:Hello there Kamosuke --
225:Korean-Japanese disputes
1399:21:44, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
1299:and complying with our
1197:18:33, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
1180:07:53, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
1127:00:13, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
1114:07:29, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
1076:21:44, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
976:15:56, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
938:元年 三月 與倭國通好 以奈勿王子未斯欣爲質
878:21:44, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
805:15:56, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
696:18:33, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
686:23:45, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
237:Football World Cup 2002
1711:Nice to see you here!
1496:66.32.117.147, again,
784:interpreting a meaning
520:
514:
496:
478:
467:
451:
424:
419:
401:
378:
351:
342:
323:
1556:comment was added by
1475:comment was added by
1413:comment was added by
1363:comment was added by
1295:while writing in the
1149:No original reasearch
780:interpreting a speech
519:
510:
492:
471:
462:
446:
420:
411:
397:
374:
346:
337:
319:
31:request for mediation
25:Request for mediation
1771:blocked indefinitely
1464:Kamosuke please read
1439:for further details.
578:Talk:Tsushima Island
1577:re: Liancourt Rocks
1522:you say. Regards,
1046:Pardon me, but why
588:Knowledge (XXG):3RR
118:now. Thanks again.
1798:
1623:user contributions
1602:user contributions
1287:such knowledge is
521:
427:However,President
270:However,President
1802:
1801:
1796:
1777:
1753:
1573:
1533:
1492:
1456:
1430:
1397:
1380:
1351:
1221:Original research
1074:
974:
876:
803:
602:
525:three-revert rule
233:Syngman Rhee line
182:The United States
131:
100:
70:
53::Please indicate
29:Hi, I've filed a
1867:
1808:
1779:
1776:
1750:
1743:
1551:
1527:
1470:
1450:
1408:
1391:
1358:
1348:
1293:cite that source
1068:
1063:
1024:
968:
962:
954:
870:
865:
841:
797:
791:
772:
596:
385:
207:The relation to
128:
122:
97:
91:
87:? Thanks a lot.
67:
61:
1875:
1874:
1870:
1869:
1868:
1866:
1865:
1864:
1845:
1844:
1818:
1816:Tea on the pus?
1797:
1769:, and has been
1765:established by
1741:
1727:
1709:
1678:
1647:
1590:Liancourt Rocks
1579:
1552:—The preceding
1543:
1471:—The preceding
1466:
1409:—The preceding
1359:—The preceding
1349:Note: en -: -->
1045:
1010:
959:
952:
862:
839:
777:
758:
611:
566:Tsushima Island
559:
557:Tsushima Island
544:
542:Togo Heihachiro
393:
384:diplomatic war
301:
296:
251:
221:Liancourt Rocks
217:Yasukuni Shrine
172:Sydney Olympics
156:
145:
126:
95:
65:
27:
19:
12:
11:
5:
1873:
1871:
1863:
1862:
1857:
1847:
1846:
1817:
1814:
1800:
1799:
1778:
1775:
1764:
1761:HaradaSanosuke
1751:
1740:
1737:
1726:
1721:New vote over
1719:
1708:
1705:
1677:
1674:
1646:
1645:Polite warning
1643:
1642:
1641:
1619:page histories
1598:page histories
1578:
1575:
1542:
1539:
1538:
1537:
1524:Eiríkr Útlendi
1510:
1509:
1465:
1462:
1461:
1460:
1447:Eiríkr Útlendi
1441:
1440:
1404:
1403:
1402:
1401:
1388:Eiríkr Útlendi
1355:
1354:
1353:
1352:
1334:
1333:
1332:
1331:
1320:
1319:
1318:
1317:
1310:
1309:
1308:
1307:
1306:
1305:
1275:
1274:
1273:
1272:
1271:
1270:
1263:
1262:
1261:
1260:
1259:
1258:
1247:
1246:
1245:
1244:
1243:
1242:
1235:
1234:
1233:
1232:
1231:
1230:
1212:
1211:
1210:
1209:
1190:
1189:
1186:
1166:
1165:
1164:
1163:
1157:
1156:
1142:
1141:
1134:
1133:
1132:
1131:
1130:
1129:
1107:
1106:
1105:
1104:
1103:
1102:
1101:
1100:
1087:
1086:
1085:
1084:
1083:
1082:
1081:
1080:
1079:
1078:
1065:Eiríkr Útlendi
1060:interpretation
1034:
1033:
1032:
1031:
1030:
1029:
1028:
1027:
1026:
1025:
999:
998:
997:
996:
995:
994:
993:
992:
989:
979:
978:
965:Eiríkr Útlendi
956:
955:
949:
948:
947:
946:
943:
936:
926:
925:
924:
923:
922:
921:
920:
919:
916:
906:
905:
904:
903:
902:
901:
889:
888:
887:
886:
885:
884:
883:
882:
881:
880:
867:Eiríkr Útlendi
851:
850:
849:
848:
847:
846:
845:
844:
843:
842:
828:
827:
826:
825:
824:
823:
820:
819:
818:
808:
807:
794:Eiríkr Útlendi
774:
773:
755:
754:
753:
752:
751:
750:
749:
748:
741:
738:
726:
725:
724:
723:
722:
721:
720:
719:
716:
713:
706:
691:
689:
688:
679:
676:
673:
666:
665:
654:
653:
650:
643:
642:
635:
634:
631:
627:
626:
619:
618:
610:
607:
593:Eiríkr Útlendi
558:
555:
543:
540:
442:
409:
389:
300:
297:
295:
292:
250:
247:
245:
242:
176:Turin Olympics
155:
152:
150:
144:
141:
140:
139:
138:
137:
136:
135:
107:
106:
105:
104:
26:
23:
18:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1872:
1861:
1858:
1856:
1853:
1852:
1850:
1843:
1842:
1838:
1834:
1830:
1825:
1821:
1815:
1813:
1812:
1809:
1795:
1791:
1787:
1783:
1774:
1772:
1768:
1762:
1758:
1752:
1749:
1745:
1744:
1738:
1736:
1735:
1732:
1724:
1720:
1718:
1717:
1714:
1706:
1704:
1703:
1700:
1695:
1692:
1691:
1688:
1683:
1675:
1673:
1672:
1669:
1664:
1660:
1656:
1652:
1649:As stated in
1644:
1640:
1637:
1632:
1628:
1624:
1620:
1616:
1613:
1612:
1611:
1610:
1607:
1603:
1599:
1595:
1591:
1587:
1583:
1576:
1574:
1571:
1567:
1563:
1559:
1558:66.32.117.147
1555:
1547:
1540:
1536:
1532:
1531:
1525:
1521:
1517:
1512:
1511:
1506:
1502:
1501:
1495:
1494:
1493:
1490:
1486:
1482:
1478:
1477:66.32.117.147
1474:
1463:
1459:
1455:
1454:
1448:
1443:
1442:
1438:
1433:
1432:
1431:
1428:
1424:
1420:
1416:
1415:66.32.117.147
1412:
1400:
1396:
1395:
1389:
1385:
1384:
1383:
1382:
1381:
1378:
1374:
1370:
1366:
1365:66.32.117.147
1362:
1346:
1342:
1338:
1337:
1336:
1335:
1329:
1324:
1323:
1322:
1321:
1314:
1313:
1312:
1311:
1304:
1302:
1298:
1294:
1290:
1284:
1281:
1280:
1279:
1278:
1277:
1276:
1269:
1268:
1267:
1266:
1265:
1264:
1257:
1253:
1252:
1251:
1250:
1249:
1248:
1241:
1240:
1239:
1238:
1237:
1236:
1229:
1227:
1222:
1218:
1217:
1216:
1215:
1214:
1213:
1207:
1203:
1202:
1201:
1200:
1199:
1198:
1195:
1187:
1184:
1183:
1182:
1181:
1178:
1174:
1169:
1161:
1160:
1159:
1158:
1154:
1153:
1152:
1150:
1145:
1139:
1138:
1137:
1128:
1125:
1122:
1121:
1120:
1119:
1118:
1117:
1116:
1115:
1112:
1097:
1096:
1093:
1092:
1091:
1090:
1089:
1088:
1077:
1073:
1072:
1066:
1061:
1057:
1053:
1052:understanding
1049:
1044:
1043:
1042:
1041:
1040:
1039:
1038:
1037:
1036:
1035:
1022:
1018:
1014:
1009:
1008:
1007:
1006:
1005:
1004:
1003:
1002:
1001:
1000:
990:
987:
986:
985:
984:
983:
982:
981:
980:
977:
973:
972:
966:
958:
957:
951:
950:
944:
941:
937:
934:
930:
929:
928:
927:
917:
914:
913:
912:
911:
910:
909:
908:
907:
899:
895:
894:
893:
892:
891:
890:
879:
875:
874:
868:
861:
860:
859:
858:
857:
856:
855:
854:
853:
852:
838:
837:
836:
835:
834:
833:
832:
831:
830:
829:
821:
816:
815:
814:
813:
812:
811:
810:
809:
806:
802:
801:
795:
789:
785:
781:
776:
775:
770:
766:
762:
757:
756:
746:
742:
739:
736:
735:
732:
731:
730:
729:
728:
727:
717:
714:
711:
710:
707:
704:
703:
702:
701:
700:
699:
698:
697:
694:
687:
684:
680:
677:
674:
671:
670:
669:
663:
662:
661:
657:
651:
648:
647:
646:
640:
639:
638:
632:
629:
628:
624:
623:
622:
616:
615:
614:
608:
606:
605:
601:
600:
594:
589:
585:
584:
579:
575:
571:
567:
562:
556:
554:
553:
550:
541:
539:
538:
534:
530:
526:
518:
513:
509:
508:
505:
501:
495:
491:
490:
487:
483:
477:
474:
470:
466:
461:
458:
457:
450:
445:
440:
439:
437:
434:
433:
430:
423:
418:
416:
410:
407:
406:
400:
396:
392:
388:
387:
377:
373:
370:
369:
366:
364:
361:
357:
350:
345:
341:
336:
335:
332:
328:
322:
318:
317:
314:
310:
306:
298:
294:Headline text
293:
291:
289:
285:
284:
281:
279:
275:
273:
269:
266:
263:
260:
256:
248:
246:
243:
240:
238:
234:
230:
226:
222:
218:
214:
210:
205:
202:
198:
194:
192:
188:
183:
179:
177:
173:
169:
165:
161:
153:
151:
148:
142:
134:
129:
121:
117:
113:
112:
111:
110:
109:
108:
103:
98:
90:
86:
82:
78:
77:
76:
75:
74:
73:
68:
60:
56:
52:
49:
44:
43:
40:
36:
32:
24:
22:
16:
1826:
1822:
1819:
1803:
1754:
1731:John Smith's
1728:
1723:Sea of Japan
1710:
1699:Shogo Kawada
1696:
1693:
1687:Shogo Kawada
1679:
1648:
1630:
1626:
1614:
1581:
1580:
1548:
1544:
1530:Tala við mig
1528:
1519:
1515:
1504:
1498:please read
1497:
1467:
1453:Tala við mig
1451:
1405:
1394:Tala við mig
1392:
1356:
1344:
1340:
1327:
1297:third person
1289:unverifiable
1286:
1282:
1254:
1220:
1219:
1191:
1172:
1170:
1167:
1148:
1146:
1143:
1135:
1108:
1071:Tala við mig
1069:
1059:
1055:
1051:
1047:
1020:
1016:
1012:
971:Tala við mig
969:
873:Tala við mig
871:
800:Tala við mig
798:
787:
783:
782:, but as in
779:
768:
764:
760:
747:宋書 列傳第五十七 夷蠻
745:Book of Song
690:
667:
658:
655:
644:
636:
620:
612:
599:Tala við mig
597:
582:
581:
573:
563:
560:
545:
522:
511:
497:
493:
479:
475:
472:
468:
463:
459:
454:
452:
447:
441:
435:
429:Roh Moo-hyun
426:
425:
421:
415:Roh Moo-hyun
412:
408:
403:
402:
398:
394:
390:
380:
379:
375:
371:
360:Roh Moo-hyun
356:Kim Dae-jung
353:
352:
347:
343:
338:
324:
320:
302:
286:
276:
272:Roh Moo-hyun
259:Roh Moo-hyun
255:Kim Dae-jung
252:
244:
241:
229:Rhee Syngman
206:
195:
180:
157:
149:
146:
50:
47:
45:
28:
20:
1757:sock puppet
1586:RFD closure
1508:discussion.
1301:NPOV policy
1226:Jimbo Wales
1023:のせいかもしれません。
940:Samguk Sagi
933:Samguk Sagi
482:South Korea
305:South Korea
187:Vietnam war
160:North Korea
1849:Categories
1786:page moves
1651:Talk:Japan
1177:Tortfeasor
1124:Tortfeasor
693:Tortfeasor
201:Korean War
164:Korean War
120:Flcelloguy
89:Flcelloguy
59:Flcelloguy
48:Bold text'
1794:block log
1767:CheckUser
1668:Sir Edgar
1636:JLaTondre
1606:JLaTondre
1162:Kamosuke,
942:三國史記 百済本紀
504:Deiaemeth
486:Deiaemeth
484:article.
331:Deiaemeth
313:Deiaemeth
81:talk page
51:Bold text
1833:Jbaranao
1790:all logs
1782:contribs
1707:Welcome!
1566:contribs
1554:unsigned
1485:contribs
1473:unsigned
1423:contribs
1411:unsigned
1373:contribs
1361:unsigned
1316:sources.
1194:Kamosuke
1111:Kamosuke
1054:without
683:Kamosuke
405:nation.
367:, 2005.
191:Iraq war
189:and the
1827:It was
763:」ではなく、「
174:to the
35:Appleby
1666:you.--
1661:, and
583:before
574:please
413:Thus,
1713:Chris
1682:Korea
1204:From
1099:done.
609:Hello
209:Japan
197:China
127:note?
96:note?
66:note?
21:Test
1837:talk
1780:See
1725:edit
1621:and
1600:and
1588:for
1562:talk
1520:what
1481:talk
1419:talk
1369:talk
1171:3)
1048:must
1017:解釈する
1015:」には「
1013:理解する
767:」です。
570:here
533:talk
309:NPOV
55:here
17:Test
1807:日本穣
1759:of
1631:not
1627:not
1516:how
1062:.
963:--
792:--
549:PHG
529:Nlu
39:Nlu
1851::
1839:)
1792:—
1788:—
1784:—
1657:,
1568:)
1564:•
1541:PS
1526:|
1487:)
1483:•
1449:|
1425:)
1421:•
1390:|
1375:)
1371:•
1285:if
1175:.
1067:|
1021:解釈
967:|
869:|
796:|
769:解釈
765:解釈
761:通訳
595:|
535:)
215:,
125:A
94:A
64:A
1835:(
1773:.
1763:,
1572:.
1560:(
1491:.
1479:(
1429:.
1417:(
1379:.
1367:(
1208::
531:(
130:)
123:(
99:)
92:(
69:)
62:(
46:'
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.