User talk:Kanjuzi - Knowledge (XXG)

3320:(2) However, his poetry was very well known both in India and Persia throughout all the centuries from his lifetime up to the present day, and it is not possible that anyone who knew anything about Persian literature would not know that this line (the opening line of his 13th ghazal) was written by Saadi. Just as for anyone who has read any English literature, it is obvious that "Whan that Aprille with his shoures soote" or "I wandered lonely as a cloud" or "O wild west wind, thou breath of autumn's being" are written by Chaucer, Wordsworth, and Shelley respectively, without any need to name the author. So it is unlikely that Salim is claiming that the line is his or that anyone would understand him to be claiming that. 340:"As I mentioned before, you can classify Shakespeare's plays in a library alphabetically or chronologically but not both at the same time." - I am 100% sure that you did not understand what I wrote. I was exactly telling you that the article is organized in one way until the half (say 'alphabetically'), then there are two sections of lightly related topics organized in a different way (say 'chronologically'), then one section with miscelanious information that should be somewhere else within the article (wrong place according to your own ordering). But you are informed and you think the article is good despite my feedback. I know that you will revert any change, so I will not try to correct or improve it anymore. 2909:. My understanding is that even a short vowel at the end of a verse was considered by ancient prosodists to count as long, because of the pause that followed it. This is why it is impossible to end a line with a dactyl, since, with the pause at the end of the line, – u u would automatically be counted as – u –. However, lots of scholars would agree with you, so there is no harm in writing "x" for the last syllable if there is any doubt. And it seems that even if it counted as long, a final short vowel was felt to be shorter than a short vowel + consonant and avoided by some poets as insufficiently heavy to end a line. So in a way you are right. 151:

into unnecessary details. 5. I'm not annoyed about anything you wrote on the Talk page but I just think that you don't understand the Knowledge (XXG) rules, which are that an article has to summarise the standard view, not give your own personal ideas about the subject. 6. Any statement of anything except the most basic and uncontroversial facts needs a reference to a standard work on the subject. A random sentence from Varro in which he happens to use a verb with the spelling -ontur cannot be used to support the view that -ontur verbs are generally held to form a separate conjugation.

111:

infinitive verb, not the 1st person singular present active as the previous text suggested. And another correction whereby I make sure the sequence of two verbs 'sum, esse' is not called 'verb', but 'vocabulary item' (or 'dictionary entry', or 'lexical item', if you will). For inflected words, one vocabulary item corresponds to multiple words. Finally, you removed all remarks that point to the fact that there are five conjugations, not four, and the historical reasons why one regular conjugation is called 'mixed conjugation'.

1694: 3909:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. I did this rather than removing the uncited material in the article, which I felt would be more disruptive. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to ask on my talk page. When you have the required sourcing (and every assertion needs a source), and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Or feel free to ping me to take another look. 2325:

accurate and your comment is puzzling. Perhaps you were mistaking me for the other editor who made the earlier change? Incidentally, the introduction as it now stands seems to me to be a little over-emphatic on the attacking side. Is it necessary to say twice in six lines (with a repeated reference) that his work is pseudoscientific? Personally I preferred the previous wording that his work is regarded as pseudoscientific. It seems more neutral. And it only needs to be said once.

337:

wiki article. A modern way of thinking includes understanding what a unit is, what a class is, what a name is, and how to use them in a scientific way. It also includes the expectation that any reader can use a concordance tool such as to verify examples and a translation tool such as to understand them. The information that people will search for in wikipedia is that which they cannot do already with those digital tools. We are coming from two very different perspectives.

939: 890: 169:ī-Konjugation". They do two classifications of the conjugations: a number classification with four categories of conjugation ("1.", "2.", "3.", "4."), one of which subsumes two conjugations; and a word classification with five options (ā, ē, konsonantische, gemischte, ī). The numbers correspond to the endings of the infinitive. The words correspond to the conjugations as inflectional classes. The latter classification is the most modern one. 34: 4076:; what more could it say without departing into side-topics and irrelevancy? Would you perhaps like more examples of lines of poetry in the metres mentioned? Something on generative metrics? But I deliberately excluded that since it is highly speculative and not particularly relevant to the topic. The quality and length of this article in no way compare to the example given in the criteria of a typical Start-class article ( 631: 482: 778: 4278: 4188: 3745: 3423: 2994: 2350: 2167: 1619: 1264: 50: 1053: 989: 691: 307:

along and rearrange everything according to your preferences, if other users are happy with the way it is. In Knowledge (XXG) the people who got there first and created the article tend to get to decide the way an article is arranged. Why don't you find a new topic and write about that? I have created nearly 60 Knowledge (XXG) articles so there are plenty of topics to choose from.

2258: 364: 3326:(4) It is not clear from the photos which order the half-lines come in. Is photo 2 the one on the left and photo 1 the one on the right or the other way round? But in any case, it seems from the meaning that the half-line "Ah, if only I could see the face of my beloved again" ought to come first. If they are the other way round the couplet doesn't really make any sense. 650:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see 501:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see 3965: 2594: 545: 409: 1227: 3927:

for Knowledge (XXG) (several of them awarded grade B by reviewers) your strictures on this one are puzzling! If you could kindly point out one or two places in particular where a more precise citation is needed I would be very grateful. I will then go over those places again and others like them and see what I can do.

3612:. I once asked the writer Professor Steve Chimombo about this, and he went and asked in the university for me but came up with no names apart from these. The Malawians have lots of names for different edible termites and caterpillars, but it seems that they have never been interested in the stars, which is surprising. 4430:

I was looking for information about the novel, and so changed the link. But later I realised that the paragraph is talking about the films and their dates, so I changed it back. The other three links are also for the page on the film, so it makes sense for this one to direct to the film page as well.

3642:

Not too surprising, really. If they don't play an important role in the culture, say in a calendar or for seafaring, how would you ever keep track? How would you know if a particular light was Jupiter or Saturn? Certainly over multiple generations. Even if there were names, it's likely that you'd get

2845:

Ah..you must be a little shocked to find that I have a fouth thing to point out, but don't worry :), its just a little suggestion. I know it's really annoying writing all the "-" thingies on top of letters when writing in Latin. I find it really annoying, escpecially when typing, and sometimes I dont

2777:

Super alta vectus Attis celeri rate maria Phrygi(um) ut nemus citato cupide pede tetigit adiitqu(e) opaca silvis redimita loca deae, stimulatus ibi furenti rabie, vagus animis devolsit il(i) acuto sibi pondera silice. The meter is: u u – u – u – – | u u – u u u u – u u – u – u – – | u u – u u u u – u

150:

is not a verb. All the dictionaries call it a verb. Merriam-Webster's dictionary calls the English equivalent "be" a verb. 4. The introduction, as you left it, was more like an essay. We should stick to the standard encyclopaedic style. The introduction should be as concise as possible, without going

114:

The reason for reverting was "New rewriting is too verbose and "chatty"." Why? Why? Are you upset because of something I told you in Talk page? I do not want to enter an edit fight, I just want to understand. Currently, without any message, it feels like you are invested in preventing any corrections

1469:

true with the "pre" markup, but I think most people feel that it meshes with the rest of the text better as it lacks the boxy background. I see you generally keep your scansions separate from the verse text. Personally I prefer pairing the scansion with each line (as above), but even your method can

4414:

Hello, i saw ypu changed a link from film to novel for "The day of the owl" in the Leonard Sciascia article and then reverted it. The change seems to me to be correct (even if the book's page is somewhat bad), did you have a particular reason to undo your own edit? (if somebody else had done it i'd

2294:

I don't know whether your edit was perhaps a misclick, but you said that you were restoring references, when the edit in fact removed neutrally phrased and sourced info, replacing it with phrasing that was against a strong and long-standing consensus on the article talk page. If it was an accident,

4063:

so rapidly. But I am puzzled why you have decided to give it only "Start" classification. I have examined the criteria carefully. The sources are all highly reliable. The grammar, spelling, writing style, jargon use etc. are all as far as I can see perfectly good. It is now 30000 bytes, which is a

3926:

Your moving of my article to draft space surprises me, since it seems that everything is very well documented. The whole thing has been compiled using the books and articles mentioned in the references, all of which are in respectable academic publications. Having now written more than 50 articles

2324:

No, it was not a misclick. The change I made was to restore two references to books which refer to Hancock's ideas as pseudoscience. Somewhere during the last few edits those two references had been removed, although not by me, and I thought it useful to put them back. So my edit summary was quite

1828:

Aiutum! I am struggling with the difference between evocare and devocare, evoco and devoco. I understand evoco to mean to summon, or lure. An evocatio was a ritual designed to "distract" a city's gods by a besieging army. But I find in Pliny's Natural Histories XXVIII ch.4, devocare is used for

1146:

and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion

746:

336:

There is almost 130 years of research between the book you cite and today. Modern linguistics as a science first began in the early 1900s, decades after this book. Now we have computers. We have corpora. We have unicode. We process texts automatically. We are communicating through a talk page of a

332:

is classified as "3rd mixed conjugation". The authors were very clever when they did this. They contemplated the fact that some people still use four historical conjugation names (1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th) and that other people adopt the more modern naming convention with one name per conjugation (ā, ē,

172:

2. This depends on whether you want 'conjugation' to be a descriptive term or an invented enumeration. If conjugation is an inflectional class, all digital systems for processing corpora will need a specific class for this inflectional class. You might be ignoring the works in the last 30 years in

3359:

Many thanks again for your detailed and helpful reply and edit help. On your last 6th point I do completely agree wonder whether such exaggerations are South Asian signature feature, I hope I have not started exaggerating myself being student of South Asian studies. There are so many of instance

306:

Your idea of "poorly structured" differs from other people's. As I mentioned before, you can classify Shakespeare's plays in a library alphabetically or chronologically but not both at the same time. When the librarian has already decided on the alphabetical arrangement, it isn't for you to come

168:

1b. Go to the end of the dictionary in Langenscheidt at the section "Conjugation" ("Konjugation" in German). As I cited in the version you reverted, they present FIVE conjugations: in German, "1. ā-Konjugation", "2. ē-Konjugation", "3. konsonantische Konjugation", "3. gemischte Konjugation", "4.

4371:

Well, thank you very much; that's marvellous! Looking over your translation I noticed one or two small errors (there are some in my version also!), which I have corrected. But the corrections may not have appeared yet, since it says: "Dies ist eine ungesichtete Version. Alle 3 Änderungen müssen

110:

In particular, when it comes to the number of conjugations, you reverted my fixes to a wrong version that cites a work from 1895 as something written by a 'grammarian' 'in modern times'. You also reverted a correction whereby I make clear that the four inflectional class names are based on the

1631:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

2179:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

3849:

Daniel, there does not need to be a new article on Latin tenses. There is already a perfectly good article on the subject, and the changes you are making, with your own idiosyncratic terminology, are not an improvement. Why don't you write an article on something else instead?

1018:

or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our

1491:

This kind of stuff can be done with tables too, but I believe this is a bad choice because it requires more skill both for the initial editor, and for any subsequent editors who wish to modify it. Furthermore, both methods shown above are WYSIWYG, which helps immensely.

2437:, which correctly and safely displays the pipe character both within tables and within templates, without breaking the functionality of either. And as far as I know, it works in other situations too, but to my knowledge, regular pipes won't break other stuff. Cheers. 251:

I do not mind corrections regarding encyclopaedic style. From my perspective, the problem only comes when the information is wrong, contradictory or poorly structured discursively. Currently, the article is poorly structured and contains false/misleading information.

1595:

of crazy combinations of html tricks (and I needed someone else to figure out the "pre" solution). Almost all fail, usually because almost all replace multiple spaces with single spaces, which is death to our attempt to line up characters WYSIWYG. Cheers.

2752:...which means the last syllable can be either short "u" or long "-" and this is the part where I have some objections to the meter. Not all of the last syllables are long "-", they dont count as a long syllable by nature nor a long syllable by postion. 3332:(6) The description of the tombstone as "one of the finest pieces of carving in the world" seems to me an absurd exaggeration. From the photographs it looks a fine piece of carving but nothing particularly special: there are hundreds of others like it. 1093:. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of 145:

is "3", i.e. 3rd conjugation. The same is true of all the other standard reference books written in English. 2. No one at all says that -ontur verbs make a different conjugation. This is something you have invented. 3. I don't know why you claim that

1276:

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

804:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

4064:

good length for such a minor topic. The article seems clearly organised and I can't think of a better way of arranging it. As for the content it covers everything that is written on the subject in all the major textbooks, such as West's

3329:(5) References to the story of Leyli and Majnun are found not only in Saadi but also in virtually every classical Persian poet, so if Salim referred to himself as "Majnun" everyone would know what he meant. The story is very well known. 1010:

It is possible that the bot was mistaken and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

3323:(3) Examining the photos carefully, I see that (although it is very faint) the first word of the line is in fact "āh" rather than "vah ki", so I have changed the transcription back again. Either variant is metrically possible. 3834:. All contents of your current article that you do not find there have been moved to subordinate articles. Please give me a go for me to publish the new version or make comments on what you think the page should be improved. 3267:, while now for sure we know that it was kind of plagiarizing on part of Jahangir but since he has put his own name as Majanun Salim Akbar on cenotaph We will need to mention his name too with note that it is actually from 2816:

From the poem I've been taught to read, it says, "....vagus animī" instead of "...vagus animis", and to my interpretation, it means "wandering mind of his" and that should be "animī" instead of "animis" as it should be in

3567:

which is relevant to that.) But it isn't iambic shortening. I've found one by Dabouis which partly fits the bill but am still searching. It discusses reduction of vowels, but not the shortening of whole syllables such as

2904:

Thank you very much for your comments. This is a very interesting point, and it seems that scholars differ as to whether a final syllable consisting of short vowel + consonant should be counted as long or short: see

4233: 3790: 3466: 3037: 2393: 2207: 1659: 1304: 4114:). There are some differences between today and classical Persian; so, there, in that classical verse, you can find the Persian compound verb "exbār kardan". So, simply, the word is not "axbār" (pl. of "xabar"). – 1781:

I have created a personal user award to recognize contributions related to ancient Roman history, which I have dubbed "The Barnstar of Tacitus". Could you check my translation: "stella horreorum Taciti"? Thanks.

1706:

I have been reading through your linguistics articles. They are clear, informative and understandable, even to a layman such as myself - everything Knowledge (XXG) aspires to be. Thank you for your contributions.

808:

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

849:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 375:

a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Knowledge (XXG)'s

4349:

I just wanted to let you know that I found your article on Latin clauses very helpful and instructive. In case you hadn't noticed: I translated the article (with minor changes) for the German Knowledge (XXG),

2793:. for example lets just say "tetigit", "git" is not long by nature nor is it long by position, and therefore it should not be marked with "-". *There are a few more that should not be marked with "-" 4217:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 3774:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 3450:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 3021:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 2377:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 2191:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 1643:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 1288:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 3360:

that any courtesy appreciation along with exaggerations involved by guests specially foreign one is taken by heart by most South Asians. Usually I leave such things for Copy editors to take care.

1591:, not part of the continuous text, and a little framing (even just white framing) doesn't hurt (not unlike a blockquote). And on Knowledge (XXG), there is no limit on "ink and paper". I've tried a 1524:

That's a good idea. I will experiment and see how it looks. Usually I avoid the initial-space courier-font boxes as they look ugly, but the stacked scansions as you have done them look attractive.

3995: 2868:..so if I forgot the "-" thingie....I could mess up with the whole conjugations...and that would be a disaster...(at least for me) OH YEAH...it changes the pronounciaton too.. did you realize..? 2615: 566: 321:

Ask any person you trust what time range he/she imagines when he/she reads "In modern times, grammarians...". If they give any date before they were born, you tell me here. One person is enough.

3317:(1) That Saadi himself visited India is doubtful. In particular, his description of the visit to the temple at Somnath is described by the scholar Katouzian as "almost certainly fictitious". 3141:, it is misquoted with the half-lines the wrong way round. It should be (the following is the Iranian pronunciation, which is not as appropriate as the Indian pronunciation in the article): 4202: 3759: 3436: 3007: 2363: 1424:

Hi, Kanjuzi. I see you've done quite a bit of work relating to quantitative metrics. I expect I have nothing to tell you on that topic. However, you may find some of my struggles with the

4289: 2262: 333:

consonantal, mixed, ī). I know you are one of the people who still use the historical conjugation names and that you want them to be the "modern ones". However, this is not the case.

1499:

which itself seems to be of no use, but by-the-bye contains several notes on what potential scansion symbols tend to render correctly, and a couple of tricks to do stuff like this:

141:

modern, in comparison to Varro and Donatus. The system of four conjugations has not changed since then. For example, Langenscheidt's pocket dictionary (I have it here) reports that

2756:

A syllable is long by nature when you can see that there is a "-" across the vowel, e.g. :nāvis. "nā" is a long syllable (tempus longus) by nature and "vis" is short (tempus breve)

4470:, I took three photos of the section on future periphrasis because the information is spread in three pages (Vol. 2.1. Pages 160-162). How do I send them to you in K-S per email? 2846:

remember whether or not there is one. BUT....it is best to write it, particularly when writing carmina, quia it gives at least it gives me a better sense when figuring out the

2433:

Hi, Kanjuzi. I happened to notice a couple of your recent edits, in which you're dealing with pipes (|) in sensitive situations. I suspect that the trick you're looking for is

3098:

but the reference seems from a journalist, so being RS I included info in the article but still I would prefer to being reviewed/confirmed that the couplet really existed in

1115:

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Knowledge (XXG) to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you

280:

German terminology differs from the terminology typical of English-language publications. But even in the German-language Langenscheidt, as your quotation makes clear,

3223:; Secondly since times of Akbar Mughals used to have well maintained Kitab Khana, So it would be curious to know whether the verse reached directly from some writing 3255: 3252: 801: 371:

appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person or organization added to a list

4137:) 18:01, 1 August 2023 (UTC) – And I have been pronouncing it wrong ever since I saw the poem on the wall of bar of the Irantour Hotel in Isfahan 49 years ago! 1874:

is to call someone down (e.g. to call on a god to come down from heaven to help), but it also has a range of other meanings such as invite, lure, etc. The form

70: 4445:

Thank you! It seems weird to have references to the movies rather than the original books in the lede but given that the reversal makes perfect sense. Cheers,

751:. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 2508:

stay the way it is now and at the same time you would allow Knowledge (XXG) visitors access to facts about the Latin language described in the literature. --

1587:

To my knowledge the space is unavoidable. It may not be exactly what you want, but I don't think you should see it as a terrible thing. These are, after all

3717:

Actually the wiki needs you whenever you have time to create a few templates info boxes (maybe 2,or 3) to be used in countries.Of course when you have time.

2554: 1394: 1349: 1124: 790: 3531:. But despite searching everywhere I can't find any articles about this to refer to. Can you suggest anything? You are the sort of person who might know. 3515:

I am composing an article about iambic shortening. Most of it is about Latin, but I would like to add something about English iambic shortening too, e.g.

1120: 1024: 4390:. This means that every change made by IPs or users with too few edits must be reviewed by other users. I like the idea, but sometimes it's very buggy. 2770:

even if a former word ends with vowell that is short by nature and the next word begins with 2 consonants e.g. : occulta spolia "ta" is long by position

1496: 4485:

If you received an email notifying you of a change to the article by me, you will see at the bottom a way of contacting me by email. Does that work?

3674:

misses you as you were one of the active users who were correcting mistakes,fixing general errors. Your presence there mattered and matters. Thanks.

1042: 728: 720: 680: 662: 513: 1926:= 'if a reader, invited to the table, neglects to say a blessing'. Underneath a footnote queries the word and suggests that perhaps it ought to say 727:

how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the

49: 2550: 1390: 1345: 4285: 3094:

As I received a ref from other user from recent discussion @ Knowledge (XXG):Reference desk/Humanities, the said couplet is likely to be of

4256: 3813: 3489: 3059: 2415: 2221: 1673: 1318: 874: 1572:

to see how it looks. It looks fine, except for the big space above and below the scansion. I don't know if that can be got rid of easily?

1128: 220:... which belong to that vocabulary item. It is the vocabulary item, not the verb, that belongs to a class. For instance, the verbal item 3978:

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Knowledge (XXG)! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

2935:

By the way, yes, as a Latin teacher I hear the difference between -ere and -ēre very well, though you are right that not everyone does!

2237:

Hello, Thank you for your message; if you are concerned about the rating you could ask a member of the Latin WikiProject to review it.--

956: 907: 4027: 4006: 3952: 2629: 2581: 580: 532: 431: 396: 4077: 1431:– u u – – – u u – u u – u u – – Scanning a verse line: starting a line with a space is a good way. 1905: 1840: 1787: 562: 3991: 2625: 576: 427: 4252: 3809: 3485: 3055: 2411: 2217: 1669: 1539:

If you don't like the boxes, then use the "pre" style, particularly since these lines, at least, have no other required markup:

1314: 870: 4226: 4023: 4002: 3783: 3606:

Chichewa has no names for any stars or planets, apart from the Pleiades, the Milky Way, and the Morning Star, which they call

3459: 3030: 2386: 2200: 1652: 1297: 1062: 700: 4281: 4270: 3831: 2789:

are all written with "-", indicating that they all are long syllables, I'm sorry to say, but, not all the last syllablae are

1387:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 1342:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 646:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 497:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 292:

both belong to the 3rd declension, even though they are slightly different and the accusative singular is regem but turrim.

2303: 2270: 2051: 2009: 1967: 493: 2540: 1148: 748: 651: 502: 1108: 861:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to

794: 4518: 4504: 4475: 4238: 3839: 3795: 3471: 3042: 2513: 2398: 2212: 1901: 1836: 1783: 1664: 1309: 866: 551: 536: 345: 257: 120: 2135: 2093: 1069: 707: 2497: 2285:, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use 1379:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

1334:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

1199: 642: 385: 3242:

is concerned is it possible to confirm whether what is actually written on cenotaph matches as is with version of

2767:

vowell before a consonant ending the former word and a consonant e.g. : caelum caeruleum "lum" is long by position

1805:– though perhaps the latter's a bit fussy; the first is better. Try running it past someone else who knows Latin! 1741: 1015: 3696:

How very kind! Thank you. I am not really an expert in Tumbuka, but I will do what I can. Keep up the good work!

2857:

AND...it can change a word..for example, you should be familiar with the 4 categories of verbs..? well...yes...

2781:(I must say again..you did a good job marking the synaloephae..not everyone knows how..) In your meter the last 4450: 4420: 3877:, is not suitable as written to remain published. While it appears to be notable, it needs more citations from 1032: 614: 303:

a "vocabulary item" is slightly weird. Everyone else calls it simply a verb, e.g. Lewis and Short's dictionary.

4214: 3771: 3447: 3018: 2374: 2188: 1640: 1285: 1023:

for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see

4395: 4359: 4168: 4119: 4049: 4022:

Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

2887: 2242: 974: 945: 925: 896: 743: 716: 684: 3902: 2544: 1086: 1020: 732: 377: 4514: 4500: 4471: 3835: 3725: 3679: 2509: 2047: 2005: 1963: 1569: 1482: 1156: 938: 889: 341: 272: 253: 232:

belongs to the first-person, singular, present, indicative categories, not the vocabulary item. In Latin,

132: 116: 2759:

A syllable is long by position when (please allow me to show you examples, it may seem really confusing):

2536: 1132: 862: 3874: 3866: 3648: 3597: 3555: 2611: 1693: 1203: 381: 4391: 4355: 3207:

This raises some more curiosity in my mind as follows, (Sorry it seems to have gone bit long below)

963: 914: 277:

1895 seems very modern compared with Varro! How do you know that other people won't think it's modern?

3987: 2527:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

2131: 2089: 2039: 1997: 1951: 1123:. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see 810: 4387: 4196: 3753: 3430: 3001: 2357: 2286: 2175: 1627: 1272: 1254: 838: 829: 4446: 4416: 4343: 4299: 3215:

seems to have visited India too but there is a difference of almost 3 & 1/2 century in between

2956: 2778:

u – u – u – – | u u – u u u u – u u – u u u u – – | u u – u u u u – – – u – u – – | u u – u u u u –

2528: 2442: 1601: 1551: 1508: 1028: 996: 754: 610: 4210: 3767: 3443: 3014: 2370: 2184: 1737: 1636: 1281: 858: 842: 785: 769: 61:!! You're invited: learn how to edit Knowledge (XXG) in under an hour. I hope to see you there! 4314: 4164: 4115: 4045: 3990:. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they 2899: 2883: 2238: 1713: 521: 465: 2281:

that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an

2266: 1930:, which would mean 'specified' or 'designated'. Anyway I don't think it's worth worrying about. 372: 4333: 4129:

Quite right, I stand corrected. exbār or ixbār it is (right at the end of Steingass's entry).

3721: 3691: 3675: 3547: 3404: 2975: 2663: 2570: 2501: 2306: 2282: 2278: 2150: 2108: 2066: 2024: 1982: 1919: 1756: 1410: 1365: 1152: 368: 104: 82: 4351: 4222: 3779: 3455: 3102:

and that it is not likely to be misquotation by the journalist who attributed the couplet to

3026: 2382: 2196: 1648: 1293: 854: 846: 4245: 4156: 3802: 3644: 3623: 3593: 3592:

BTW, do you know the Chichewa names for the planets, even if just assimilated English ones?

3551: 3510: 3478: 3370: 3298: 3276: 3264: 3239: 3116: 3049: 2741: 2600: 2585: 2405: 1236: 1193: 1176: 4225:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 4218: 3782:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 3775: 3643:

different identifications from different people. But I thought it worth asking, so thanks.

3458:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 3451: 3029:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 3022: 2806: 2385:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2378: 2199:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2192: 1651:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 1644: 1434:(I know; inappropriate for English. It's just an example.) The alternative is this markup: 1296:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 1289: 1082: 857:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 850: 724: 33: 18: 4060: 3971: 3956: 3283:'s literature ? So was whether Jahangir took connecting those lines with word Majnuj from 2918:, I looked it up and it seems that the 14th-century manuscripts of Catullus actually have 2906: 2879:

can you see ..wait hear..? *hear im sure.. the difference ...? "eh-rrr-eh" vs "ay-rrr-eh"

2764:

a vowell before 2 consonants or a double consonant e.g. : maximus "ma" is long by position

2123: 2081: 1380: 1335: 1207: 1171: 670: 3888: 3882: 3878: 2624:. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can 1832:

Evocatus is a veteran heeding the call to return to duty. So what would a devocatus be?

647: 498: 2547:, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. 1543:| – u – – | – u – – || – u – – | – u – | | uu u uu – | uu u – – || – u – – | – u – | 1488:| – u – – | – u – – || – u – – | – u – | | uu u uu – | uu u – – || – u – – | – u – | 284:

is classified as a 3rd conjugation verb. It's just a different variety. In the same way

4295: 4035: 2648: 2438: 2274: 1597: 1563: 1547: 1519: 1504: 723:, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not 599: 450: 415: 400: 3898: 3894: 1081:

requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge (XXG). This has been done under

719:

requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge (XXG). This has been done under

3942: 3910: 3284: 3280: 3268: 3243: 3232: 3228: 3224: 3216: 3212: 3182:

I have corrected the version in that article, leaving the transliteration unchanged.

3103: 3099: 3095: 3081: 2834: 2822: 2561:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

1708: 1401:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

1356:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

1105:. Knowledge (XXG) takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators 517: 461: 4486: 4467: 4432: 4373: 4329: 4325: 4138: 4130: 4081: 3928: 3851: 3711: 3697: 3668: 3629: 3613: 3577: 3532: 3400: 3396: 3385: 3354: 3336: 3199: 3183: 2971: 2967: 2936: 2659: 2566: 2562: 2505: 2491: 2476: 2469: 2453: 2326: 2319: 2298: 2146: 2142: 2104: 2100: 2062: 2058: 2020: 2016: 1978: 1974: 1931: 1897: 1879: 1806: 1773: 1752: 1748: 1729: 1573: 1525: 1406: 1402: 1361: 1357: 1211: 1143: 1078: 1046: 1000: 982: 308: 152: 78: 4187: 3744: 3422: 2993: 2621: 2349: 2166: 1618: 1263: 572: 423: 3671: 579:, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to 430:, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to 328:

is classified as a 3rd conjugation verb" - This is not true. The vocabulary item

173:

computational corpus study of Latin. But this is my focus, it needs not be yours.

3366: 3312: 3294: 3134: 3128: 3112: 2830: 2729: 2707: 1855: 1147:

tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with

747:

tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with

1851: 3246:

ref provided by you or cenotaph is following some little different rendering?

2690: 666: 4111: 4001:

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

1174:

templates for large content splits like that. I've taken care of it though.

4513:

I receive no e-mail when you change the page. Do you have an e-mail alias?

3258:

are available on Wikimedia commons I don't know how far those are readable.

2805: 2702:

It is a miracle to find another user who also knows Carmen 63 of Catullus.

4080:). Please advise, or perhaps consider changing the classification to a C. 2875:

e.g. : "scrībere" (3rd category) is pronounced : /ss-krr-eeeee-beh-rrr-eh/

1461:

I happen to prefer the initial space, because markup (anything from, say,

3220: 3138: 3088: 2786: 2782: 2532: 2085: 1835:

If you can help, awesome, don't feel obliged to respond if you can't :-)

1090: 1061:

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read

1004: 699:

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read

4229:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

4005:

without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to

3786:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

3462:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

3033:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

2628:

without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to

2389:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

2257: 2203:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

1655:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

1300:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

363: 4372:

gesichtet werden, bevor sie Benutzern standardmäßig angezeigt werden."

4318: 4206:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

3763:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

3565: 3440:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

3011:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

2367:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

2001: 1733: 1384: 1339: 845:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge (XXG)

2620:

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to

1797:

Well, it's correct if you mean a "star of Tacitus's barns". How about

1138:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may

738:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may

571:

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to

422:

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to

296:

is commonly used in German publications but not often in English ones.

4415:

have re-reversed it but since it was you i'd thought i'd ask). Best,

2749: 2043: 1089:

infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from

4522: 4508: 4494: 4479: 4454: 4440: 4424: 4399: 4381: 4363: 4337: 4303: 4260: 4172: 4146: 4123: 4089: 4053: 3964: 3936: 3920: 3859: 3843: 3817: 3729: 3705: 3683: 3652: 3637: 3601: 3585: 3564:

Yes, that's very interesting. (I've added an article by Scott Myers

3559: 3540: 3493: 3408: 3374: 3344: 3302: 3191: 3120: 3063: 2979: 2944: 2891: 2667: 2593: 2574: 2517: 2484: 2461: 2446: 2419: 2334: 2310: 2246: 2225: 2154: 2112: 2070: 2028: 1986: 1939: 1909: 1887: 1844: 1814: 1791: 1760: 1715: 1677: 1605: 1581: 1555: 1533: 1512: 1414: 1369: 1322: 1245: 1219: 1185: 1160: 1036: 976: 952: 927: 903: 878: 823: 762: 674: 618: 544: 525: 469: 408: 389: 349: 316: 261: 160: 124: 86: 4104:. Sincerely, this is not justified. Please look up "exbār kardan" ( 4034:

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider

2647:

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider

731:, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about 598:

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider

449:

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider

24: 2127: 1959: 3974:, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. 3235:

had left any line of his own followers in India during his visit.

2603:, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. 2452:

Thanks! That's a good trick. I didn't know that. Jolly useful. |

554:, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. 418:, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. 103:

You searched for the correctios that I applied to the article on

4242:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 3799:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 3475:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 3389: 3384: