Knowledge

User talk:KahnJohn27

Source 📝

327: 22: 894:
assure that I will not get into an edit-war, talk and discuss instead of reverting continuously and will not cause any disruption. If the admins do see me doing that then please block me then, I won't complain against it. I have made many useful contributions to Knowledge and that is the sole thing I wish to do. I will not make any disruptive edits. Hence I ask admins to please forgive me this once and unblock me. Thank you.
1689: 1891: 1792: 1507: 1133: 808: 396: 1059: 1746: 1007: 626:
reason for blocking me is wrong. Please unblock me, I promise I won't get into an edit-war and won't revert again. If you do see me reverting it again and edit-warring, then please block me. But for now I request you to not to impose such a long block on me, this block also hampers any ability for me to discuss and talk about the edits with other editors.
1241:, some admins even claims that his and mine account have technical connection. However, the user is not my sock-puppet and I have no connection at all with him. I don't even know who this guy is. Therefore, the judgment of Drmies of thinking me to be him is completely wrong. Hence, I ask the admins to lift the block as it is based on false grounds. 1708:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 776:
Seems you won't try to understand anything and blame me for something did not happen. This is completely inhumane and power abuse, you're trying to belittle me for not agreeing with you. I only reverted a few times. I did not get into any edit-war and nor I was going to. That's it regardless of what
481:
The administrator has blocked me over a trivial matter which isn't real. He claims I have been edit-warring though I didn't. I only reverted a few times and was never going to revert again and get into an edit war. Yet he has given me a long block of 1 week. As I said earlier I'm not going to revert
893:
My earlier unblock request had been declined because the reviewer thought I did not address the reason for my block and also because of other reasons. I do understand the reasons of as to why I was blocked. The admin blocked me over edit-warring. If the admins need an assurance, then I promise and
1369:
after he showed news sources as evidence in support for his removal of polygamy ban in India, even if I disagreed which I earlier was going to before reading his comment on the talk page, it wouldn't have made a difference. You however on the other hand have completely disregarded the evidence on
708:
No I'm not. I reverted VERY FEW TIMES and only reverted ONCE after you told me. That too because Justice007 gave false reason to remove sourced content that too without caring to discuss first. That is not edit-warring nor I was interested in getting into an edit-war and nor I will. This block is
984:
it says it's acceptable if you only revert a few times?) Now you appear to be saying that you understand you were blocked for edit warring and that you won't do it again? So which is it - were you not edit warring and the victim of inhumane power abuse, or do you accept that you were indeed edit
625:
where I took a consensus to resolve the situation about Proof and Dawn Scott's deaths as people had doubts whether they were relevant to the article. So from all of this, it can clearly be seen I'm someone who does not want to indulge in edit-warring nor I had any intention to do so. And you're
270:
So does that mean I'm edit-warring just because I reverted removal of an edit few times because of their illegitimate reasons to remove sourced content? Don't think so. I don't want to indulge in an edit-war nor I will. And I don't see how anymore of this is important as I already said I will
1332:
Agreeing with yourself on a talk page doesn't prove anything. As per admins, technical data from both accounts match. Anyone, who is clever enough can do something like that. Actually, it proves to the contrary that you tried to establish consensus in your favor using two accounts.
482:
again, get into any edit-war and will discuss the whole thing out. In fact, I had myself reported my reverted him. If you see my getting into reverting again then please do block me. But I promise I won't revert again and get into an edit-war. Therefore I ask to be unblocked.
300:
Why have you blocked me? I didn't do any edit-warring and I already said I wasn't going to. You didn't even give a notice that I've been blocked. You are over-stepping your boundaries over a small thing and have given me a draconian block of 1 week. Please unblock me now.
1474:
Please read clearly what I said in my comments. The point of my comment isn't to attack anyone, it's simply to show that this block is wromg and your actions are one of the reasons behind why it is wrong and are directly related to it. That's why I mentioned them.
1659:
Some advice. Continuing to employ unblock rationales that have been reviewed and declined can be construed as disruptive. This can result in the loss of your ability to edit this page. I advise you to delete your request and ask for help in obtaining an unblock.
620:
and I myself reported to you that I had reverted it and I told I won't revert again. Even then you claim that I'm edit-warring just because of a few reverts. I am not edit-warring and I'm not interested in it. And if actions speak louder than words, then look at
232:
The three-revert rule is a convenient limit for occasions when an edit war is happening fairly quickly, but it is not a definition of "edit warring", and it is perfectly possible to edit war without breaking the three-revert rule, or even coming close to doing
1804:
is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
1260:
are sharing multiple devices with them. There is no way whatsoever that you "have no connection at all with him" given the technical evidence. I would suggest that any further appeals that do not directly address the socking be summarily declined.
1317:, agreeing that his claim that polygamy isn't banned in India is correct. Clearly the editors who have blocked me seem to be either clearly mistaken that I have more than one account or it is a false action. So I request again to be unblocked. 1596:. However this is the only account I use, and I am the only person on my internet. So I don't understand how they claim that I have technical connection that too which is based on a false complaint made for obvious biased reasons by 1378:
which the other editor stopped you from doing. As from what I've read and seen, only after you realised that you won't be able to enforce your edits again without getting blocked, you lodged a false complaint at
493:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
1832: 1816:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 1867: 1764: 1309:
No I'm not. And I don't understand how you're still thinking that use is same as me. I don't have a sockpuppet. And also I have done some digging and I found that I've talked with this
1753: 1739: 681:
On the contrary, you are misunderstanding the issue. I stated as much in my warning to you and you insisted on reverting to your version of the content. That is edit warring.
1902: 1863: 1017: 1397:
I am not discussing the content dispute with you here and you are using your talk page for the wrong reasons. You are only allowed to post here regarding your block.
1021: 734:
Until you understand the policy the block periods will only increase. One more time I will advise you to educate yourself with regard to the edit warring policy.
1651:
template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.
1295:
template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.
939:
template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.
561:
template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.
1222:
has somehow extended it indefinitely over some claim of sock-puppeteering. I've never done any sock-puppeteering. From the notifications I've received and
173: 128: 83: 1547: 1173: 848: 436: 1720: 1016:, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Knowledge accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the 169: 124: 79: 209:; discussion does not take place in edit summaries. Go to the article talk page and establish a consensus for your version of the content. 1846: 1768: 1636: 1280: 1102: 924: 546: 524: 359: 1898: 1700: 1542: 1168: 843: 431: 1230:
is my sock-puppet over a CU check due to apparent "behaviour similarities". I've noticed that Lakhbir87 reverted the article to
1842: 1383:. As for technical data, only I use my internet and I only use this account. So clearly this either a mistake or false action. 956:
has reverted again without waiting for the discussion to be resolved. Aren't you going to block him as well for edit-warring?
667:
I did and I haven't indulged in any edit-warring since then and nor I was ever going to. You are misunderstanding this issue.
166:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 121:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 76:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 39: 35: 990: 532: 1825: 1837: 1704:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 1098: 355: 1709: 1592:
I had asked fir a unblock but a administrator has declined it citing some "technical connection" with another user
1519:
Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the
1145:
Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the
820:
Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the
408:
Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the
1520: 1461: 1412: 1348: 1146: 1071: 1066: 1039: 821: 409: 334: 1374:
and given irrational and even fake reasons to remove the sourced content. Not only that you clearly indulged in
48: 1561: 1514: 1187: 1140: 986: 862: 815: 528: 450: 403: 158:
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited
113:
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited
68:
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited
1894: 1772: 1446:
Instead of defending your block, you are attacking me which is out of scope for your talk page permissions.
1085: 1080: 1012: 976:
Part of the problem here is that you seem to be contradicting yourself. Only a couple of days ago you said "
159: 1380: 1223: 1623: 1432:
And what else do you think I'm doing except talking about my block? Dancing? You seem like a troll to me.
617: 351: 1813: 910: 1600:. Therefore, I request again for to be unblocked as this block is a wrong action by the administrator 1668: 1597: 1447: 1427: 1398: 1334: 1234: 1025: 953: 742: 689: 648: 581: 382: 247: 217: 1238: 54: 1800: 1782: 1759: 1728: 1617: 189: 163: 144: 99: 1809: 1645: 1289: 1122: 1108: 933: 906: 555: 365: 50: 21: 1824:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 1661: 1525: 1476: 1433: 1384: 1318: 1151: 957: 948: 826: 778: 771: 735: 710: 703: 682: 668: 662: 641: 627: 609: 599: 574: 414: 375: 326: 302: 295: 272: 265: 240: 210: 114: 1910: 1875: 1821: 1593: 1371: 1366: 1310: 1253: 1227: 1076: 347: 206: 1817: 1362: 1314: 1094: 180:
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these
135:
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these
90:
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these
1724: 1705: 981: 978:
I only reverted a few times. I did not get into any edit-war and nor I was going to
199: 185: 181: 140: 136: 95: 91: 1791: 1601: 1219: 1118: 622: 118: 1304: 1262: 69: 1097:. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may 569:
Yes, you repeatedly stated you would not continue to revert and then you did
1906: 1871: 1058: 354:. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may 52: 1745: 1361:
Wrong, it does prove that it isn't me. There was no consensus involved at
498:
the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Knowledge,
1914: 1879: 1850: 1828:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
1776: 1732: 1675: 1626: 1484: 1469: 1441: 1420: 1392: 1356: 1326: 1270: 1126: 1047: 994: 965: 914: 786: 749: 718: 696: 676: 655: 635: 588: 536: 389: 310: 280: 254: 224: 193: 148: 103: 971:
No. Did I block you before I warned you? 14:39, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
73: 1744: 1682:
Orphaned non-free image File:Mad Max Fury Road graphic novel cover.jpg
1868:
s:Commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Letter Koteln Prisoner2.jpg
1763:
with another article. If you are interested, please participate in
1105:, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: 362:, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: 905:
overtaken by events; block is now indef, and for block evasion.
1831:
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review
1093:, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans 640:
You made the same promise after your last edit warring block.
230:
When you have the time here's the quote from the policy page:
55: 15: 1687: 1505: 1131: 1057: 806: 394: 325: 612:
removed the sourced content over a completely false reason
1252:
Checkuser evidence is clear that you are the same user as
1226:, Drmies seems to claim that an editor by the username of 1903:
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page
1864:
s:Commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:GULAG letter.jpg
1633:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please
1277:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please
921:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please
543:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please
1653:
Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
1297:
Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
941:
Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
563:
Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
1812:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
1575: 1571: 1565: 1556: 1552: 1538: 1534: 1530: 1375: 1231: 1201: 1197: 1191: 1182: 1178: 1164: 1160: 1156: 876: 872: 866: 857: 853: 839: 835: 831: 613: 605: 570: 464: 460: 454: 445: 441: 427: 423: 419: 162:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 117:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 72:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 1719:
will be deleted after seven days, as described in the
1615:
Obvious lying fails again. Talk page access revoked.
1604:
who made the block and even potentially a false one.
1754:
List of sons of King Abdulaziz ibn Saud by seniority
1740:
List of sons of King Abdulaziz ibn Saud by seniority
1513:
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an
1139:
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an
814:
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an
514:
will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
402:
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an
1901:. You are invited to comment on the discussion at 1752:An article that you have been involved in editing— 350:. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to 239:need to better acquaint yourself with the policy. 1885:Nomination for deletion of Template:Sleeping Dogs 154:Disambiguation link notification for February 11 109:Disambiguation link notification for February 3 64:Disambiguation link notification for January 27 1715:Note that any non-free images not used in any 1701:File:Mad Max Fury Road graphic novel cover.jpg 1022:Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/KahnJohn27 8: 504:the block is no longer necessary because you 1315:Talk:Polygamy#Polygamy not illegal in India 1237:from edit-warring after I was blocked. On 511:understand what you have been blocked for, 616:. I even mentioned this to you on your 517:will make useful contributions instead. 1218:My block was set to expire today, but 777:you believe. Your block is unjustful. 231: 7: 1801:2016 Arbitration Committee elections 573:. Actions speak louder than words. 1079:. Note that multiple accounts are 1020:, then respond to the evidence at 14: 1798:Hello, KahnJohn27. Voting in the 709:unnecessary and inhumanely long. 1889: 1790: 1005: 980:" (and can you show us where in 20: 1: 1851:22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC) 1814:Knowledge arbitration process 1710:our policy for non-free media 1127:15:57, 22 February 2016 (UTC) 1048:14:33, 22 February 2016 (UTC) 995:14:41, 21 February 2016 (UTC) 966:14:01, 21 February 2016 (UTC) 915:18:06, 22 February 2016 (UTC) 787:10:22, 19 February 2016 (UTC) 750:10:17, 19 February 2016 (UTC) 719:10:12, 19 February 2016 (UTC) 697:10:04, 19 February 2016 (UTC) 677:09:57, 19 February 2016 (UTC) 656:09:53, 19 February 2016 (UTC) 636:09:31, 19 February 2016 (UTC) 589:09:12, 19 February 2016 (UTC) 537:09:26, 19 February 2016 (UTC) 390:08:29, 19 February 2016 (UTC) 338:from editing for a period of 311:08:26, 19 February 2016 (UTC) 281:06:07, 19 February 2016 (UTC) 255:21:48, 18 February 2016 (UTC) 225:13:19, 18 February 2016 (UTC) 194:12:54, 11 February 2016 (UTC) 1880:07:18, 18 January 2017 (UTC) 1721:criteria for speedy deletion 149:10:26, 3 February 2016 (UTC) 104:11:15, 27 January 2016 (UTC) 1835:and submit your choices on 1517:, who declined the request. 1143:, who declined the request. 818:, who declined the request. 406:, who declined the request. 1930: 1843:MediaWiki message delivery 1833:the candidates' statements 1733:14:12, 28 April 2016 (UTC) 1095:may be reverted or deleted 1777:14:19, 19 June 2016 (UTC) 1688: 1676:02:39, 5 March 2016 (UTC) 1637:guide to appealing blocks 1627:04:13, 5 March 2016 (UTC) 1485:14:23, 2 March 2016 (UTC) 1470:13:48, 2 March 2016 (UTC) 1442:13:39, 2 March 2016 (UTC) 1421:13:25, 2 March 2016 (UTC) 1393:11:57, 2 March 2016 (UTC) 1357:11:07, 2 March 2016 (UTC) 1327:09:32, 2 March 2016 (UTC) 1281:guide to appealing blocks 1271:00:36, 2 March 2016 (UTC) 1103:guide to appealing blocks 1077:abusing multiple accounts 925:guide to appealing blocks 547:guide to appealing blocks 525:guide to appealing blocks 360:guide to appealing blocks 352:make useful contributions 1915:15:35, 2 June 2018 (UTC) 1480: 1437: 1388: 1322: 961: 782: 714: 672: 631: 306: 276: 235:As I have advised, you 160:Grand Theft Auto Online 1899:nominated for deletion 1895:Template:Sleeping Dogs 1749: 1738:Merger discussion for 1693: 1510: 1224:this SPI investigation 1136: 1062: 811: 527:for more information. 399: 330: 1810:Arbitration Committee 1783:ArbCom Elections 2016 1765:the merger discussion 1748: 1698:Thanks for uploading 1691: 1562:change block settings 1509: 1188:change block settings 1135: 1113:Your reason here ~~~~ 1101:by first reading the 1083:, but using them for 1061: 1018:notes for the suspect 1011:You are suspected of 863:change block settings 810: 618:User talk: Tide Rolls 451:change block settings 398: 370:Your reason here ~~~~ 358:by first reading the 329: 1598:User:SheriffIsInTown 1235:User:SheriffIsInTown 954:User:SheriffIsInTown 182:opt-out instructions 137:opt-out instructions 92:opt-out instructions 1258:absolute very least 987:Boing! said Zebedee 529:Boing! said Zebedee 1826:arbitration policy 1785:: Voting now open! 1750: 1694: 1511: 1137: 1063: 812: 400: 331: 205:Stop reverting at 172:• Join us at the 127:• Join us at the 82:• Join us at the 1706:claim of fair use 1099:appeal this block 1075:from editing for 356:appeal this block 177: 164:Metro (newspaper) 132: 87: 61: 60: 1921: 1893: 1892: 1794: 1696: 1690: 1672: 1665: 1650: 1644: 1621: 1581: 1579: 1568: 1550: 1548:deleted contribs 1508: 1465: 1457: 1454: 1451: 1431: 1416: 1408: 1405: 1402: 1365:. I agreed with 1352: 1344: 1341: 1338: 1308: 1294: 1288: 1268: 1207: 1205: 1194: 1176: 1174:deleted contribs 1134: 1116: 1043: 1035: 1032: 1029: 1009: 1008: 952: 938: 932: 882: 880: 869: 851: 849:deleted contribs 809: 775: 746: 739: 707: 693: 686: 666: 652: 645: 603: 585: 578: 560: 554: 523:Please read the 470: 468: 457: 439: 437:deleted contribs 397: 386: 379: 373: 346:, as you did at 299: 269: 251: 244: 221: 214: 167: 122: 77: 56: 24: 16: 1929: 1928: 1924: 1923: 1922: 1920: 1919: 1918: 1890: 1887: 1860: 1855: 1854: 1838:the voting page 1795: 1787: 1743: 1685: 1684: 1670: 1663: 1656: 1648: 1642: 1641:, then use the 1630: 1619: 1606: 1569: 1559: 1545: 1528: 1521:blocking policy 1506: 1503: 1501:Unblock request 1463: 1455: 1452: 1449: 1428:SheriffIsInTown 1425: 1414: 1406: 1403: 1400: 1350: 1342: 1339: 1336: 1302: 1300: 1292: 1286: 1285:, then use the 1274: 1263: 1243: 1195: 1185: 1171: 1154: 1147:blocking policy 1132: 1129: 1106: 1055: 1041: 1033: 1030: 1027: 1006: 1003: 946: 944: 936: 930: 929:, then use the 918: 896: 870: 860: 846: 829: 822:blocking policy 807: 769: 744: 737: 701: 691: 684: 660: 650: 643: 610:User:Justice007 597: 583: 576: 566: 558: 552: 551:, then use the 540: 484: 458: 448: 434: 417: 410:blocking policy 395: 392: 384: 377: 363: 323: 293: 263: 249: 242: 219: 212: 203: 174:DPL WikiProject 156: 129:DPL WikiProject 115:Assyrian people 111: 84:DPL WikiProject 66: 57: 51: 29: 12: 11: 5: 1927: 1925: 1886: 1883: 1859: 1856: 1796: 1789: 1788: 1786: 1780: 1742: 1736: 1683: 1680: 1679: 1678: 1631: 1613: 1609:Decline reason 1590: 1586:Request reason 1583: 1504: 1502: 1499: 1498: 1497: 1496: 1495: 1494: 1493: 1492: 1491: 1490: 1489: 1488: 1487: 1372:Muhammad Iqbal 1275: 1250: 1246:Decline reason 1216: 1212:Request reason 1209: 1130: 1064:You have been 1056: 1054: 1051: 1002: 999: 998: 997: 973: 972: 919: 903: 899:Decline reason 891: 887:Request reason 884: 805: 804: 803: 802: 801: 800: 799: 798: 797: 796: 795: 794: 793: 792: 791: 790: 789: 732: 731: 730: 729: 728: 727: 726: 725: 724: 723: 722: 721: 592: 591: 541: 521: 520: 519: 518: 515: 512: 506: 505: 502: 491: 487:Decline reason 479: 475:Request reason 472: 393: 348:Muhammad Iqbal 332:You have been 324: 322: 319: 318: 317: 316: 315: 314: 313: 286: 285: 284: 283: 258: 257: 207:Muhammad Iqbal 202: 197: 155: 152: 110: 107: 65: 62: 59: 58: 53: 49: 47: 44: 43: 31: 30: 25: 19: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1926: 1917: 1916: 1912: 1908: 1904: 1900: 1896: 1884: 1882: 1881: 1877: 1873: 1870:. Sincerely, 1869: 1865: 1858:Gulag letters 1857: 1853: 1852: 1848: 1844: 1840: 1839: 1834: 1829: 1827: 1823: 1819: 1815: 1811: 1806: 1803: 1802: 1793: 1784: 1781: 1779: 1778: 1774: 1770: 1769:62.64.152.154 1767:. Thank you. 1766: 1762: 1761: 1758:proposed for 1755: 1747: 1741: 1737: 1735: 1734: 1730: 1726: 1723:. Thank you. 1722: 1718: 1713: 1711: 1707: 1703: 1702: 1695: 1681: 1677: 1674: 1673: 1667: 1666: 1658: 1657: 1655: 1654: 1647: 1640: 1638: 1629: 1628: 1625: 1624: 1622: 1612: 1610: 1605: 1603: 1599: 1595: 1589: 1587: 1582: 1577: 1573: 1567: 1563: 1558: 1554: 1549: 1544: 1540: 1539:global blocks 1536: 1535:active blocks 1532: 1527: 1522: 1518: 1516: 1515:administrator 1500: 1486: 1482: 1478: 1473: 1472: 1471: 1467: 1466: 1459: 1458: 1445: 1444: 1443: 1439: 1435: 1429: 1424: 1423: 1422: 1418: 1417: 1410: 1409: 1396: 1395: 1394: 1390: 1386: 1382: 1377: 1373: 1368: 1364: 1363:Talk:Polygamy 1360: 1359: 1358: 1354: 1353: 1346: 1345: 1331: 1330: 1329: 1328: 1324: 1320: 1316: 1312: 1306: 1299: 1298: 1291: 1284: 1282: 1273: 1272: 1269: 1267: 1259: 1255: 1249: 1247: 1242: 1240: 1239:his talk page 1236: 1233: 1229: 1225: 1221: 1215: 1213: 1208: 1203: 1199: 1193: 1189: 1184: 1180: 1175: 1170: 1166: 1165:global blocks 1162: 1161:active blocks 1158: 1153: 1148: 1144: 1142: 1141:administrator 1128: 1124: 1120: 1114: 1110: 1104: 1100: 1096: 1092: 1088: 1087: 1082: 1078: 1074: 1073: 1069: 1068: 1060: 1053:February 2016 1052: 1050: 1049: 1045: 1044: 1037: 1036: 1024:. Thank you. 1023: 1019: 1015: 1014: 1013:sock puppetry 1000: 996: 992: 988: 983: 979: 975: 974: 970: 969: 968: 967: 963: 959: 955: 950: 943: 942: 935: 928: 926: 917: 916: 912: 908: 902: 900: 895: 890: 888: 883: 878: 874: 868: 864: 859: 855: 850: 845: 841: 840:global blocks 837: 836:active blocks 833: 828: 823: 819: 817: 816:administrator 788: 784: 780: 773: 768: 767: 766: 765: 764: 763: 762: 761: 760: 759: 758: 757: 756: 755: 754: 753: 752: 751: 748: 747: 741: 740: 720: 716: 712: 705: 700: 699: 698: 695: 694: 688: 687: 680: 679: 678: 674: 670: 664: 659: 658: 657: 654: 653: 647: 646: 639: 638: 637: 633: 629: 624: 619: 615: 611: 608:only because 607: 601: 596: 595: 594: 593: 590: 587: 586: 580: 579: 572: 568: 567: 565: 564: 557: 550: 548: 539: 538: 534: 530: 526: 516: 513: 510: 509: 508: 507: 503: 501: 497: 496: 495: 490: 488: 483: 478: 476: 471: 466: 462: 456: 452: 447: 443: 438: 433: 429: 428:global blocks 425: 424:active blocks 421: 416: 411: 407: 405: 404:administrator 391: 388: 387: 381: 380: 371: 367: 361: 357: 353: 349: 345: 341: 337: 336: 328: 320: 312: 308: 304: 297: 292: 291: 290: 289: 288: 287: 282: 278: 274: 267: 262: 261: 260: 259: 256: 253: 252: 246: 245: 238: 234: 229: 228: 227: 226: 223: 222: 216: 215: 208: 201: 198: 196: 195: 191: 187: 183: 178: 175: 171: 165: 161: 153: 151: 150: 146: 142: 138: 133: 130: 126: 120: 116: 108: 106: 105: 101: 97: 93: 88: 85: 81: 75: 71: 63: 46: 45: 42: 41: 37: 33: 32: 28: 23: 18: 17: 1888: 1861: 1836: 1830: 1807: 1799: 1797: 1757: 1751: 1716: 1714: 1699: 1697: 1686: 1669: 1662: 1652: 1634: 1632: 1616: 1614: 1608: 1607: 1591: 1585: 1584: 1557:creation log 1524: 1512: 1462: 1448: 1413: 1399: 1376:edit-warring 1349: 1335: 1313:guy once at 1301: 1296: 1278: 1276: 1265: 1257: 1256:, or at the 1251: 1245: 1244: 1217: 1211: 1210: 1183:creation log 1150: 1138: 1112: 1090: 1086:illegitimate 1084: 1072:indefinitely 1070: 1065: 1040: 1026: 1010: 1004: 977: 945: 940: 922: 920: 904: 898: 897: 892: 886: 885: 858:creation log 825: 813: 743: 736: 733: 690: 683: 649: 642: 623:Talk: Eminem 582: 575: 562: 544: 542: 522: 499: 492: 486: 485: 480: 474: 473: 446:creation log 413: 401: 383: 376: 369: 344:edit warring 343: 339: 333: 248: 241: 236: 218: 211: 204: 200:Edit warring 179: 157: 134: 112: 89: 67: 34: 26: 1220:User:Drmies 907:Floquenbeam 119:John Joseph 1822:topic bans 1756:—has been 1553:filter log 1526:KahnJohn27 1477:KahnJohn27 1434:KahnJohn27 1385:KahnJohn27 1319:KahnJohn27 1264:Jezebel's 1179:filter log 1152:KahnJohn27 1001:SPI notice 958:KahnJohn27 949:Tide rolls 854:filter log 827:KahnJohn27 779:KahnJohn27 772:Tide rolls 711:KahnJohn27 704:Tide rolls 669:KahnJohn27 663:Tide rolls 628:KahnJohn27 600:Tide rolls 442:filter log 415:KahnJohn27 303:KahnJohn27 296:Tide rolls 273:KahnJohn27 266:Tide rolls 184:. Thanks, 139:. Thanks, 94:. Thanks, 70:Guru Arjan 1897:has been 1866:and this 1818:site bans 1635:read the 1594:Lakhbir87 1572:checkuser 1531:block log 1367:Lakhbir87 1311:Lakhbir87 1279:read the 1254:Lakhbir87 1228:Lakhbir87 1198:checkuser 1157:block log 985:warring? 923:read the 873:checkuser 832:block log 545:read the 461:checkuser 420:block log 271:discuss. 168:Read the 123:Read the 78:Read the 1717:articles 1620:itsJamie 1543:contribs 1169:contribs 1111:|reason= 1089:reasons 844:contribs 432:contribs 368:|reason= 340:one week 27:Archives 1760:merging 1725:Stefan2 1646:unblock 1566:unblock 1290:unblock 1192:unblock 1109:unblock 1081:allowed 1067:blocked 934:unblock 867:unblock 556:unblock 455:unblock 366:unblock 335:blocked 321:Blocked 186:DPL bot 141:DPL bot 96:DPL bot 74:Khusrau 1602:Drmies 1119:Drmies 1091:is not 604:I did 237:really 1671:rolls 1639:first 1464:☎ 911 1415:☎ 911 1351:☎ 911 1305:Ponyo 1283:first 1266:Ponyo 1042:☎ 911 982:WP:EW 927:first 745:rolls 692:rolls 651:rolls 584:rolls 549:first 385:rolls 250:rolls 220:rolls 1911:talk 1907:Izno 1876:talk 1872:Hunu 1862:NB: 1847:talk 1808:The 1773:talk 1729:talk 1664:Tide 1618:OhNo 1481:talk 1438:talk 1389:talk 1323:talk 1232:stop 1123:talk 991:talk 962:talk 911:talk 783:talk 738:Tide 715:talk 685:Tide 673:talk 644:Tide 632:talk 614:here 606:that 577:Tide 571:this 533:talk 378:Tide 342:for 307:talk 277:talk 243:Tide 213:Tide 190:talk 145:talk 100:talk 1712:). 1576:log 1523:). 1453:eri 1404:eri 1381:SPI 1340:eri 1202:log 1149:). 1117:. 1031:eri 877:log 824:). 465:log 412:). 374:. 233:so. 170:FAQ 125:FAQ 80:FAQ 1913:) 1905:. 1878:) 1849:) 1841:. 1820:, 1775:) 1731:) 1649:}} 1643:{{ 1611:: 1588:: 1570:• 1564:• 1560:• 1555:• 1551:• 1546:• 1541:• 1537:• 1533:• 1483:) 1468:| 1460:| 1456:ff 1450:Sh 1440:) 1419:| 1411:| 1407:ff 1401:Sh 1391:) 1355:| 1347:| 1343:ff 1337:Sh 1325:) 1293:}} 1287:{{ 1248:: 1214:: 1196:• 1190:• 1186:• 1181:• 1177:• 1172:• 1167:• 1163:• 1159:• 1125:) 1115:}} 1107:{{ 1046:| 1038:| 1034:ff 1028:Sh 993:) 964:) 937:}} 931:{{ 913:) 901:: 889:: 871:• 865:• 861:• 856:• 852:• 847:• 842:• 838:• 834:• 785:) 717:) 675:) 634:) 559:}} 553:{{ 535:) 500:or 489:: 477:: 459:• 453:• 449:• 444:• 440:• 435:• 430:• 426:• 422:• 372:}} 364:{{ 309:) 279:) 192:) 147:) 102:) 38:, 1909:( 1874:( 1845:( 1771:( 1727:( 1692:⚠ 1580:) 1578:) 1574:( 1529:( 1479:( 1436:( 1430:: 1426:@ 1387:( 1321:( 1307:: 1303:@ 1206:) 1204:) 1200:( 1155:( 1121:( 989:( 960:( 951:: 947:@ 909:( 881:) 879:) 875:( 830:( 781:( 774:: 770:@ 713:( 706:: 702:@ 671:( 665:: 661:@ 630:( 602:: 598:@ 531:( 469:) 467:) 463:( 418:( 305:( 298:: 294:@ 275:( 268:: 264:@ 188:( 176:. 143:( 131:. 98:( 86:. 40:2 36:1

Index


1
2
Guru Arjan
Khusrau
FAQ
DPL WikiProject
opt-out instructions
DPL bot
talk
11:15, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Assyrian people
John Joseph
FAQ
DPL WikiProject
opt-out instructions
DPL bot
talk
10:26, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
Grand Theft Auto Online
Metro (newspaper)
FAQ
DPL WikiProject
opt-out instructions
DPL bot
talk
12:54, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
Edit warring
Muhammad Iqbal
Tide

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.