27:
85:
151:
simply a case of someone simply using multiple accounts, and I'm a bit disappointed that he's chosen to accept your version of events, when the edit history shows a very different story, one of a pattern of disruptive and deceptive editing, including lying in your edit summary about 'bug fixes' to
146:
I for one am not so impressed, as you have used your multiple accounts, including this one, in an attempt to suppress a deletion discussion so as to benefit yourself in what seems to be a clear conflict of interest. It seems to me that the closing admin has rather missed the point: this was
128:
it is good that you admitted to sockpuppeting. I think you already know that editors are restricted to one account, and that if you continue to edit through multiple accounts, you will be blocked from editing. I sincerely hope this issue does not have to be explored again. —
53:
until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
57:
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.
50:
102:
98:
152:
cover your tracks. That said, I see that other editor has indeed placed a speedy delete tag per your offer, and so hopefully the matter will be settled soon.
39:
43:
157:
110:
63:
94:
73:
34:
18:
153:
106:
59:
130:
38:
is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to
84:
161:
140:
114:
67:
51:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Reunion Island: An
Overview
101:
for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with
99:
Knowledge (XXG):Sockpuppet investigations/Kaienhakuto
93:Your name has been mentioned in connection with a
8:
40:Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines
7:
105:before editing the evidence page.
14:
49:The article will be discussed at
103:the guide to responding to cases
83:
25:
124:First off, I want to say that
1:
79:
162:02:52, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
141:02:41, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
115:22:44, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
68:20:34, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
35:Reunion Island: An Overview
19:Reunion Island: An Overview
178:
42:or whether it should be
97:case. Please refer to
154:Shawn in Montreal
120:Multiple accounts
107:Shawn in Montreal
91:
90:
60:Shawn in Montreal
169:
137:
134:
87:
80:
29:
28:
177:
176:
172:
171:
170:
168:
167:
166:
135:
132:
122:
78:
30:
26:
23:
12:
11:
5:
175:
173:
165:
164:
126:I am impressed
121:
118:
89:
88:
77:
71:
24:
22:
17:Nomination of
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
174:
163:
159:
155:
150:
145:
144:
143:
142:
139:
138:
127:
119:
117:
116:
112:
108:
104:
100:
96:
86:
82:
81:
75:
72:
70:
69:
65:
61:
55:
52:
47:
45:
41:
37:
36:
20:
16:
148:
131:
125:
123:
95:sockpuppetry
92:
74:Sockpuppetry
56:
48:
33:
32:The article
31:
21:for deletion
136:Annyong
44:deleted
133:Hello
158:talk
111:talk
76:case
64:talk
149:not
160:)
113:)
66:)
46:.
156:(
109:(
62:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
