715:
likely copyvios). Here, I would have chosen either the facebook or the myspace, and left out the others. The bot is mainly designed to notify you of its concerns, not necessarily to really keep out the links. It also focuses on new editors and IPs, as they are likely not familiar with the policies and guidelines. It will not re-revert on undo/revert actions, it will also not re-revert to its own edit (it may re-revert if others edit the page in between). I hope this clarifies a bit. --
219:
620:) to get the site whitelisted. Thanks for initiating this discussion; I for one will let the Facebook page stay up if I see it there again. However, we could really use a specific, or at least clearer, guideline on this, since lots of minor celebrities use their Facebook page or Twitter feed as their official website nowadays.
469:
I apologize for not directly addressing your concern in my original post. Please understand that my answer was not meant to dismiss your concern or portray your inquiry as undeserving in some way. My aim was to present the general scope of verifiability. As you have already seen, much of
Knowledge
714:
There are exceptions, but they are pretty minor (quite some time ago I checked 30 MySpace reverts of XLinkBot - I found 1 that I would not personally have reverted, though I would also not have added it if it was my choice; a more recent quick-check of YouTube-reverts found 2 out of 10 to be very
450:
only if: it is not unduly self-serving; it does not involve claims about third parties; it does not involve claims about events not directly related to the subject; there is no reasonable doubt as to its authenticity; the article is not based primarily on such sources." Alice's links meet these
615:
linking to
Facebook on Knowledge (XXG), I think that under the above policies a link to her Facebook page (although not Twitter and other links, per point 4) would just about be appropriate. XLinkBot can be overridden by reverting - if it keeps on removing the link, you can contact the bot owner
682:
The bot is designed to revert such additions, and to leave you a message regarding its revert. It there also suggests to re-do the edit (or undo the bot edit) if the bot made a mistake (which already suggests that the bot will not re-revert there), or to partially undo the edit leaving out the
280:
In response to this, "An official link is a link to a website or other
Internet service that meets both of the following: The linked content is controlled by the subject of the Knowledge (XXG) article", Alice runs her own Facebook, Twitter, etc. She is the one posting and reading/responding to
809:
Added Alice Ripley's name to national tour information, only because it's a rare occasion that a lead actress from the
Broadway production takes that show on the road. It was particularly rare for Ripley to helm the national tour while the Broadway production was still
25:'s page to what it was prior to a Feb. 21, 2012 major edit that left 12 errors, mostly in the wake of its cutting-and-pasting. In other words, the edit was really just a rearranging of existing information, rather than a contribution to the article's accuracy.
356:, Facebook is one of the links not to go in the encyclopedia; that's why your edits were reverted by the bot. However above that, it says that a link to an official page should be fine, so re-adding it won't do any harm. Either that or I could do it for you. --
470:(XXG) is in the interpretation. Each case is unique; each case should be determined on its own merits through discussion and analysis. Personally, I think its entirely possible that the sources you mention could be used as "official links". This is the
182:
the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read
Knowledge (XXG)'s
577:
Hi
Kasamoto. You raise an interesting question, and one which is not directly covered by policy - what happens when an individaul designates their Facebook page as their official site? There are several parts of the External links policy to consider:
593:, an official site is one where: "The linked content is controlled by the subject (organization or individual person) of the Knowledge (XXG) article." and "The linked content primarily covers the area for which the subject of the article is notable."
302:) pages to learn what I could. Given that the links are taken down by an automated bot, is my message/appeal here moot? As in, even if the links fit the Official links criteria, will they be taken down just by virtue of the revert being automated?
532:
Hi andy4789, and thanks for your help and offer. Do you mean I can re-add Alice's
Facebook, Twitter, etc. links? Or that you could do that? Won't they just get taken down by an automatic bot? Would using the "undo" function instead make a
675:.com but use myspace or facebook as an official site (though then regularly there are questions of notability of the subject), other subjects have an official site, but are very known for their, say, twitter feed, then a twitter feed
28:
The only contributions made were: 1) gossip, and incorrect gossip at that, and 2) the creation of a Music section, which was placed so that it is separate from the Career section when it should have been a sub-category of Career.
799:
Clarified that much of the drama and trauma depicted comes not from the illness itself, but from the misdiagnosis and unsuccessful efforts to treat Diana's condition (mental illness as a manifestation of unrecognized/unresolved
702:
They do not tell anything substantial (almost always true for twitter - it does not tell anything encyclopedic about the person - we don't need to know that the subject is on their way to the beach, or going to eat cake
664:
However, it is not in the aim of
Knowledge (XXG) to list all possible sites of a subject. Most subjects on Knowledge (XXG) have an official site (something like 'subject.com'), and that almost immediately invalidates
600:: "although links to websites that require readers to register ... to view content are normally not acceptable in the External links section, such a link may be included when it is an official website for the subject."
44:
album was changed from Feb. 2011 to 2011, which then led the editor to list the albums not in chronological order. 6) Lack of consistency: albums were italicized, but not RIPLEY, the EP. 7) Under Film, the
56:, which is the incorrect title and also, by its italics, denotes it to be an album when it is a song. 10) the Off-Broadway section starting with "Additional roles..." 11) the phrase "Ripley's has acted in
699:
They are plain copyvio (quite often true for YouTube, sometimes for others - yes, the video is interesting, but it was (often) copied from a TV broadcast - only a few bands upload their videos to YouTube)
690:
They are not the official site of the subject of the page (impersonations happen quite a bit on twitter and facebook, twitters of band-members on pages of the band, non-existent pages (<subject: -->
284:"The linked content primarily covers the area for which the subject of the article is notable." Content covers her various genres of work: musical theater, solo career, band, photography, and artwork.
148:), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's
290:
Many bands use their MySpace page as their official site. Alice does this; her MySpace is listed in various theater and concert programs. Is she not allowed to do this on
Knowledge (XXG)?
396:
were you citing and which part of my question were you clarifying? My basic question is, Are official
Facebook, Twitter, etc. links ever allowed as official links? I read the article,
36:. 4) All awards were moved to the Broadway section. However, none of Ripley's Drama Desk, Outer Critics Circle, or Helen Hayes nominations/award were for the Broadway version of
607:: "Knowledge (XXG) does not attempt to document or provide links to every part of the subject's web presence or provide readers with a handy list of all social networking sites."
433:. Quoting from those: "Never use self-published sourcesâincluding but not limited to books, zines, websites, blogs, and tweetsâas sources of material about a living person,
287:"Official links (if any) are provided to give the reader the opportunity to see what the subject says about itself." Alice's Facebook, etc. provide this exact opportunity.
806:
The term "suburban life" has no significance if it's not about peeling back the shiny veneer (sliding away the house's walls) to reveal what's actually going on inside.
446:
Quoting: "Using the subject as a self-published source: Living persons may publish material about themselves, such as through press releases or personal websites.
106:
Welcome to Knowledge (XXG). Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page
738:
Kasamoto, to sum up the conversation above, I'd say it is OK to add a link to Alice's Facebook or Myspace page (choose the most relevant), but only that, per
417:
397:
393:
325:
128:) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Knowledge (XXG). If the external link you inserted or changed was to a
305:
4) In the guidelines, is it stated somewhere why Facebook, Twitter, and MySpace links are not allowed? I haven't been able to find that info.
276:
after reading that "These links are exempt from the links normally to be avoided, but they are not exempt from the restrictions on linking."
49:
information is repetitive. 8) When information was added, no citations were provided, yet the editor asked for citations on other items.
742:. So feel free to add it now, and hopefully the bot won't revert you (considering the fact you've been whitelisted). Hope this helped. --
586:: "Knowledge (XXG) articles about any organization, person, website, or other entity should link to the subject's official site, if any."
724:
After edit conflict: yes, the owner is Versageek, I am an operator of the bot. Yunshui, any admin can override the bot for a user, see
238:
686:
So why the revert? Many, many of the additions of links to twitter, facebook, myspace, youtube etc. are inappropriate, some case:
161:
269:, the guideline provides an exception, "Except for a link to an official page of the article's subject " Is this not applicable?
623:
188:
175:
759:
373:
262:. Thank you for the additional information you provided. Thanks ahead of time for clarification regarding the following:
639:
171:
157:
725:
167:
412:
people's Facebook, Twitter, etc. as sources. I'm seeking to use the Facebook, Twitter, etc. of Alice Ripley, the
353:
266:
259:
137:
739:
604:
597:
590:
545:
273:
153:
149:
242:
490:
336:
553:
430:
754:
649:
368:
299:
200:
583:
679:
be a second addition. But it is by far not within Knowledge (XXG)'s goal to list all of them.
536:
I know I wrote a lot, but my basic questions are 1) Are official Facebook, Twitter, etc. links
32:
Factual errors included: 3) the deletion of both the Off-Broadway and Regional productions of
635:
192:
612:
479:
179:
145:
120:
was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our
225:
549:
475:
483:
329:
184:
121:
787:
617:
771:
743:
729:
716:
560:
507:
455:
357:
309:
295:
196:
87:
63:
631:
437:" Yes, the Facebook posts, Tweets, etc. are written by the subject, Alice Ripley.
405:
255:
117:
107:
83:
22:
670:.com already links to their other sites, or because the other sites offer nothing
218:
695:
They are superfluous since there are other official sites (often <subject: -->
674:. There are some exceptions to that, some subjects don't have a <subject: -->
556:, will this not matter since it's an automated bot? As in, am I wasting my time?
506:. It was just broad and happened to be a guideline I'd already considered. --
160:. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see
82:
The discussion below is about the "External links" section of the article about
52:
Typographical errors included: 9) the single "Beautiful Eyes" being changed to
696:.com links to the youtube, facebook, twitter, myspace in a quite prominent way)
710:
official, most are self-proclaimed official fan sites) fan-sites (myspace)
629:
actually I won't, the matter has been discussed to death in the archives
141:
779:
764:
732:
719:
643:
568:
515:
502:
Hi, no need to apologize! I did not take your reply to be dismissive
497:
474:
for article talk pages, and in some cases more visible forums such as
463:
404:
to cite, as in, those that would fall under the References section of
378:
343:
317:
204:
95:
71:
125:
400:, but 1) I'm not seeking to use Alice's Facebook, Twitter, etc. as
254:
Before putting up Facebook, Twitter, MySpace, and YouTube links on
133:
669:
other official sites as suitable - often because <subject: -->
129:
213:
258:'s page, I made sure to read about external links, including
178:, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to
770:
Many thanks, everyone, for the information! Very helpful.
392:
Thanks, Tiderolls. However, I need to ask: Which part of
60:" 12) and double punctuation in the Off-Broadway section.
814:
661:
allowed. If they were not, they would be blacklisted.
435:
unless written or published by the subject (see below).
230:
113:
796:
Moved bipolar details to section about mental illness.
654:)I saw your remark on XLinkBot, and I'll answer here:
237:, contact the responding user(s) directly on their
228:has been answered. If you need more help, you can
540:allowed as official links? and 2) Let's say they
815:TOU's Paid contributions amendment, 2014 pending
657:Yes, official links to Facebook, Twitter, etc.
482:. Thanks for your patience and understanding.
829:Simonson, Robert. Playbill.com, Mar. 18, 2013
124:. The external link(s) you added or changed (
418:Knowledge (XXG):Biographies of living persons
408:. 2) The article explains why one can't use
8:
398:Knowledge (XXG):Identifying reliable sources
394:Knowledge (XXG):Identifying reliable sources
326:Knowledge (XXG):Identifying reliable sources
156:), or they are not written by a recognised,
229:
691:does not use facebook.com/<subject: -->
626:, to which you'd be welcome to contribute.
819:Not applicable. Service uncompensated.
822:
728:(where I have added you, Kasamoto). --
431:Self-published or questionable sources
448:Such material may be used as a source
191:. For more information about me, see
187:for more information, and consult my
7:
624:Knowledge (XXG) talk:External links
14:
189:list of frequently-reverted sites
217:
166:If you were trying to insert an
126:http://twitter.com/ripleytheband
308:Thanks for your assistance! --
616:(which from memory I think is
40:. 5) The release date of the
1:
780:19:39, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
765:16:05, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
733:08:46, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
720:08:46, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
644:08:25, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
569:02:38, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
516:03:53, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
498:03:25, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
464:03:53, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
379:12:54, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
344:05:03, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
318:01:13, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
210:Question about official links
205:20:41, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
96:03:16, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
416:of the Wiki article. Here,
324:For clarification check out
267:Links normally to be avoided
260:Links normally to be avoided
154:Linking to copyrighted works
726:User:XLinkBot/UserWhitelist
706:They are official (if they
622:I'll raise a discussion at
251:Hello XLinkBot and others,
241:, or consider visiting the
846:
272:2) I put the links up as
170:that does comply with our
102:External links, Feb. 2012
775:
564:
511:
459:
429:I read that, as well as
313:
294:3) I read through your
185:external links guideline
138:free web hosting service
122:external links guideline
91:
72:22:21, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
67:
144:, or similar site (see
683:'offending' links.
146:'Links to avoid', #11
232:ask another question
162:conflict of interest
17:Major edit, May 2012
47:Isn't It Delicious?
110:has been reverted.
653:
630:
596:In addition, per
420:becomes relevant.
249:
248:
234:on your talk page
837:
830:
827:
803:Added citations.
791:edits, Feb. 2014
762:
757:
751:
647:
628:
494:
487:
376:
371:
365:
340:
333:
236:
221:
214:
845:
844:
840:
839:
838:
836:
835:
834:
833:
828:
824:
817:
793:
760:
755:
744:
627:
492:
485:
374:
369:
358:
354:WP:LINKSTOAVOID
338:
331:
212:
158:reliable source
104:
80:
19:
12:
11:
5:
843:
841:
832:
831:
821:
816:
813:
812:
811:
807:
804:
801:
797:
792:
788:Next to Normal
784:
768:
767:
712:
711:
704:
700:
697:
693:
621:
609:
608:
601:
594:
587:
575:
574:
573:
572:
559:Thanks again,
557:
534:
526:
524:
523:
522:
521:
520:
519:
500:
452:
441:
440:
439:
438:
424:
423:
422:
421:
386:
384:
383:
382:
381:
347:
346:
292:
291:
288:
285:
282:
274:Official links
247:
246:
239:user talk page
222:
211:
208:
165:
111:
103:
100:
79:
76:
42:Daily Practice
38:Next to Normal
34:Next to Normal
18:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
842:
826:
823:
820:
808:
805:
802:
798:
795:
794:
790:
789:
785:
783:
781:
777:
773:
766:
763:
758:
752:
749:
748:
741:
740:WP:ELOFFICIAL
737:
736:
735:
734:
731:
730:Dirk Beetstra
727:
722:
721:
718:
717:Dirk Beetstra
709:
705:
701:
698:
694:
692:but an alias)
689:
688:
687:
684:
680:
678:
673:
668:
662:
660:
655:
651:
650:edit conflict
645:
642:
641:
637:
633:
625:
619:
614:
606:
605:WP:ELOFFICIAL
602:
599:
598:WP:ELOFFICIAL
595:
592:
591:WP:ELOFFICIAL
588:
585:
581:
580:
579:
570:
566:
562:
558:
555:
551:
547:
546:WP:ELOFFICIAL
544:allowed, per
543:
539:
535:
531:
530:
529:
528:
527:
517:
513:
509:
505:
501:
499:
496:
495:
489:
488:
481:
477:
473:
472:raison d'ĂȘtre
468:
467:
465:
461:
457:
453:
451:requirements.
449:
445:
444:
443:
442:
436:
432:
428:
427:
426:
425:
419:
415:
411:
407:
403:
399:
395:
391:
390:
389:
388:
387:
380:
377:
372:
366:
363:
362:
355:
351:
350:
349:
348:
345:
342:
341:
335:
334:
327:
323:
322:
321:
319:
315:
311:
306:
303:
301:
297:
289:
286:
283:
279:
278:
277:
275:
270:
268:
263:
261:
257:
252:
244:
240:
235:
233:
227:
223:
220:
216:
215:
209:
207:
206:
202:
198:
194:
190:
186:
181:
177:
173:
169:
168:external link
163:
159:
155:
151:
147:
143:
139:
135:
131:
127:
123:
119:
115:
109:
101:
99:
97:
93:
89:
85:
77:
75:
73:
69:
65:
61:
59:
58:The Adulterer
55:
54:Beautiful Eye
50:
48:
43:
39:
35:
30:
26:
24:
16:
825:
818:
786:
769:
746:
745:
723:
713:
707:
685:
681:
676:
671:
666:
663:
658:
656:
634:
610:
576:
541:
537:
525:
503:
491:
484:
471:
447:
434:
413:
409:
406:Alice Ripley
401:
385:
360:
359:
337:
330:
307:
304:
293:
271:
264:
256:Alice Ripley
253:
250:
231:
226:help request
195:. Thanks! --
118:Alice Ripley
108:Alice Ripley
105:
84:Alice Ripley
81:
62:
57:
53:
51:
46:
41:
37:
33:
31:
27:
23:Alice Ripley
20:
603:Again, per
533:difference?
454:Thanks, --
193:my FAQ page
21:I restored
761:contribs?)
703:somewhere)
554:WP:TWITTER
375:contribs?)
176:guidelines
112:Your edit
782:Kasamoto
618:Versageek
613:I dislike
466:Kasamoto
320:Kasamoto
281:messages.
265:1) Under
150:copyright
98:Kasamoto
74:Kasamoto
810:playing.
772:Kasamoto
747:andy4789
611:Much as
584:WP:ELYES
571:Kasamoto
561:Kasamoto
518:Kasamoto
508:Kasamoto
456:Kasamoto
361:andy4789
352:Hey. On
310:Kasamoto
296:XLinkBot
243:Teahouse
197:XLinkBot
172:policies
88:Kasamoto
64:Kasamoto
800:grief).
632:Yunshui
480:WP:BLPN
414:subject
402:sources
142:fansite
756:(talk?
552:, and
550:WP:BLP
504:at all
476:WP:RSN
370:(talk?
78:A note
672:extra
493:rolls
410:other
339:rolls
298:and (
224:This
152:(see
134:forum
86:. --
776:talk
589:Per
582:Per
565:talk
538:ever
512:talk
486:Tide
478:and
460:talk
332:Tide
314:talk
300:talk
201:talk
180:undo
174:and
130:blog
114:here
92:talk
68:talk
708:are
677:may
667:all
659:are
542:are
116:to
778:)
753:·
567:)
548:,
514:)
462:)
367:·
328:.
316:)
203:)
164:).
140:,
136:,
132:,
94:)
70:)
774:(
750:â
652:)
648:(
646:(
640:æ°Ž
638:â
636:éČ
563:(
510:(
458:(
364:â
312:(
245:.
199:(
90:(
66:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.