262:
and the re-sale history of the company was a big factor in the quality issues, as described in Sadler v
Advanced Bionics, a big local case) - the Advanced Bionics section would be bigger than the rest of the article. So how much am I allowed to add to the Sonova article? Will it be allowed a separate article if it gets too long? I thought the rule was that you can't edit a company page only if you work for the company (I don't, although I did work for Graeters many years ago if I need to declare that to edit them), not if you have negative experience with them. And could information about the company before it was in Sonova be in the Sonova article?
199:
lady called Liz deleted it even more so I can't bring back my contribution about the latest company scandal (fined for lying to the FDA). If a blocked person wrote the article about the president, would they delete the article about the president? I try to help
Knowledge but it turns out to be worth nothing anyway. Al so Knowledge insists on calling a private ownership aquarium "public" because it is open to the public, making readers think that it's not corporate owned. I don't want to write about anything if it will just get revoked by company censors.--
311:
discussion needs to be followed). I'm not sure what the exact process for undeleting an article that was deleted due to deletion discussion is, it may be possible to get the article undeleted. And you are allowed to edit a company's page if you've had a negative experience with them, it's just something to keep in mind, you still want to try to edit in a neutral manner even if that is the case. As for how much you can add to the Sonova article - I'm not sure, it depends on
454:
682:
498:
724:
225:(and it already includes content about wrongdoing by the company), which may be an appropriate place for any content about the company. I'd also be very careful about making any accusations about covering up etc. Such accusations aren't generally helpful to a constructive and collaborative environment, and they might violate wikipedia policies relating to conduct such as
352:
I tried to talk to the people but Liz hasn't responded to my question and the talkpage of the article is now gone! Nobody wants to discuss, everyone just wants to delete delete delete! I'm not even sure if it's alright for me to edit articles about the 108, since I am
Catholic and part Polish. Will
261:
I tried to explain in the edit summary that the 2017 deletion was based on outdated information (years before more recent incidents that gave more media attention). There isn't enough space in the Sonova article to detail the whole history of the company (which used to be part of Boston
Scientific,
198:
It's not just that. Knowledge is covering up the shady practices of the company that hurt my grandaughter! Nothing makes sense! One said it wasn't notable but I looked on the talkpage and that decision was made before the newer recall before I could even start writing about the court case. Now some
368:
Being catholic and part polish isn't a conflict of interest (although as always you want to try to edit things in a neutral manner). Those won't be deleted for you editing them, unless there happens to be a legitimate reason to delete them (but I think that's probably unlikely for most of those
310:
There doesn't seem to be a rush, I think someone just disagreed with that particular edit, perhaps if you talked with them you could come to a compromise. I also wouldn't say there's a rush to delete it, there was a discussion to delete that article (and generally the resulting consensus of a
284:
I just don't understand why anybody thinks its a good idea to delete so much without discussing it. Anybody who googles the company name can find lots of press. And lots of things that weren't known in 2017 are now famous. Why is there such a hurry to bury
137:, which is quite a useful and easy to use gadget you can enable in your settings, and makes doing it more straightforward (you would need to wait four days from your account creation to use twinkle though, since it requires you to be
315:. As for whether you can add content from before they were part of Sonova - I'm also not sure about that, that's a good question. You may be able to find answers for some of the questions at the
635:
752:
633:! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
535:
236:
It will be the case that some editors revert your changes for some reason or another, that happens to everyone, although it can be frustrating. You can follow the steps in
184:
Things on wikipedia can seem complicated at first, which is why it's a good idea to just start with simpler things and eventually you'll understand how things work better
218:
548:
557:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit
623:
579:
247:
Like I said this can all seem pretty complicated, so it can be a good idea to just take things slowly until you get the hang of it more and more
774:
572:
522:
217:(which may or may not apply here, but it may be helpful). That article was previously deleted, and you can read about the reasons for that
781:
152:. If you can't find that, then you'd use twinkle to nominate the article for deletion, and in the reason explain that the article fails
45:
303:
277:
22:
148:, which is a fairly long page, but it ultimately comes down to whether the subject has significant, non trivial coverage in multiple
669:
504:
485:
544:
528:
26:
696:
599:
540:
226:
94:, generally if an edit changes the meaning of something (even if it's just a single word) it shouldn't be marked as minor
649:, a friendly space on Knowledge where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
471:
420:
133:
which explains the process and what valid grounds for deletion are. When I've nominated articles for deletion I've used
737:
732:
507:
has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by
Mattdaviesfsic was:
770:
654:
609:
565:
489:
390:
673:
467:
466:
Loved the new Henry
Kaczorowski page. Hope we can find more information on him. Thanks for a great article!
797:
763:
756:
742:
551:
when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for
Knowledge.
138:
67:
700:
510:
291:
265:
230:
687:
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the
650:
605:
374:
324:
252:
189:
161:
99:
80:
29:
and wanted to welcome you to the
Knowledge community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
645:
555:
2nd paragraph largely unsourced as far as I can see, more ref's needed for notability potentially
316:
55:
51:
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
789:
543:). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see
432:
354:
295:
269:
237:
200:
171:
134:
116:
36:
312:
129:
It took me a while before I started nominating articles for deletion. You can read through
708:
91:
319:. This is all getting into some tricky territory which I don't fully understand either --
571:
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and
453:
370:
320:
248:
185:
157:
156:, and that you've been unable to find sufficient coverage of it to indicate notability
95:
76:
244:, that is, open a discussion on the talk page, and see if you can come to an agreement
398:
241:
214:
153:
145:
130:
427:
394:
149:
622:
221:. The company that I think you're talking about has a subsection in the article
681:
497:
704:
802:
723:
712:
658:
613:
475:
439:
378:
362:
328:
256:
208:
193:
179:
165:
124:
103:
84:
747:
780:
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the
144:
In this case you'd want to check whether the topic of the article meets
112:
643:
questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
240:. Generally, if someone reverts you, you want to follow the steps in
222:
141:, I'd recommend waiting for that since twinkle makes it much easier)
288:
And why is there a rush to call a corporate-owned aquarium public?
769:, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be
63:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
784:, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page:
703:. The comment the reviewer left was: Article repeated deleted.
564:
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
32:
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
582:
associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the
722:
680:
496:
517:
coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in
509:
This submission's references do not show that the subject
600:
Knowledge's real-time chat help from experienced editors
689:
592:
584:
568:
and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
753:
Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/PlanespotterA320
578:
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any
701:
not sufficiently notable for inclusion in
Knowledge
414:
410:
409:To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with
389:Hello, KentuckyPony. Thank you for your work on
403:
385:I have sent you a note about a page you started
353:those articles be deleted too if I edit them?--
699:. The reason left by S0091 was: This topic is
115:It doesn't look very worth an article to me.--
111:Also how do I nominate this one for deletion?
397:, while examining this page as a part of our
8:
113:https://en.wikipedia.org/Stites_%26_Harbison
413:. Please remember to sign your reply with
289:
263:
170:Nevermind, that sounds too complicated.--
786:{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
541:guidelines on the notability of people
7:
553:The comment the reviewer left was:
755:. Note that multiple accounts are
503:Your recent article submission to
108:Okay, thanks for letting me know.
14:
511:qualifies for a Knowledge article
423:tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
621:
452:
405:Thanks for creating the article!
697:Knowledge's real-time chat help
691:Articles for creation help desk
636:Articles for creation help desk
586:Articles for creation help desk
751:per the evidence presented at
401:, had the following comments:
27:Herschend Family Entertainment
1:
559:after they have been resolved
48:page covers the same topics.
476:15:44, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
440:15:59, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
379:21:59, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
363:15:59, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
329:03:58, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
257:03:16, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
209:02:10, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
194:01:52, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
90:Just a note, have a look at
69:Volunteer at the Task Center
513:—that is, they do not show
419:(Message delivered via the
180:15:16, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
166:05:32, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
125:01:27, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
104:01:22, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
85:01:20, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
21:Hi KentuckyPony! I noticed
819:
659:10:39, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
614:10:39, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
150:reliable secondary sources
782:guide to appealing blocks
743:abusing multiple accounts
566:Draft:Bogumiła Noiszewska
451:
391:Maria Klemensa Staszewska
46:contributing to Knowledge
803:12:09, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
713:16:38, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
539:of the subject (see the
358:
299:
273:
204:
175:
120:
57:Get help at the Teahouse
38:Learn more about editing
718:Blocked as a sockpuppet
727:
685:
501:
407:
213:I'd recommend reading
748:User:PlanespotterA320
726:
684:
670:Articles for creation
505:Articles for Creation
500:
486:Articles for creation
460:The Original Barnstar
399:page curation process
594:reviewer's talk page
44:Alternatively, the
745:as a sockpuppet of
668:Your submission at
490:Bogumiła Noiszewska
484:Your submission at
445:A barnstar for you!
728:
686:
639:. If you have any
502:
468:BoyTheKingCanDance
23:your contributions
741:from editing for
665:
664:
580:untoward behavior
549:mistakes to avoid
533:sources that are
481:
480:
424:
307:
294:comment added by
281:
268:comment added by
810:
795:
792:
787:
750:
694:
674:Advanced Bionics
625:
618:
617:
597:
589:
547:and learn about
456:
449:
448:
437:
436:
430:
418:
416:
412:
75:Happy editing!
72:
70:
60:
58:
41:
39:
818:
817:
813:
812:
811:
809:
808:
807:
806:
805:
800:
793:
790:
785:
778:
746:
720:
715:
688:
678:
661:
616:
591:
583:
556:
552:
494:
447:
434:
433:
428:
387:
68:
66:
56:
54:
37:
35:
19:
12:
11:
5:
816:
814:
798:
779:
730:You have been
729:
721:
719:
716:
679:
677:
666:
663:
662:
651:Mattdaviesfsic
628:
626:
606:Mattdaviesfsic
604:
603:
576:
573:may be deleted
569:
554:
545:technical help
508:
495:
493:
482:
479:
478:
463:
462:
457:
446:
443:
411:{{Re|SunDawn}}
386:
383:
382:
381:
350:
349:
348:
347:
346:
345:
344:
343:
342:
341:
340:
339:
338:
337:
336:
335:
334:
333:
332:
331:
286:
282:
245:
234:
142:
18:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
815:
804:
801:
796:
783:
776:
772:
768:
766:
765:
758:
754:
749:
744:
740:
739:
735:
734:
725:
717:
714:
710:
706:
702:
698:
693:
692:
683:
675:
671:
667:
660:
656:
652:
648:
647:
642:
638:
637:
632:
627:
624:
620:
619:
615:
611:
607:
601:
596:
595:
588:
587:
581:
577:
574:
570:
567:
563:
562:
560:
550:
546:
542:
538:
537:
532:
531:
526:
525:
520:
516:
512:
506:
499:
491:
487:
483:
477:
473:
469:
465:
464:
461:
458:
455:
450:
444:
442:
441:
438:
431:
425:
422:
421:Page Curation
406:
402:
400:
396:
392:
384:
380:
376:
372:
367:
366:
365:
364:
360:
356:
330:
326:
322:
318:
314:
309:
308:
305:
301:
297:
293:
287:
283:
279:
275:
271:
267:
260:
259:
258:
254:
250:
246:
243:
239:
235:
232:
228:
224:
220:
216:
212:
211:
210:
206:
202:
197:
196:
195:
191:
187:
183:
182:
181:
177:
173:
169:
168:
167:
163:
159:
155:
151:
147:
143:
140:
139:autoconfirmed
136:
132:
128:
127:
126:
122:
118:
114:
110:
109:
107:
106:
105:
101:
97:
93:
89:
88:
87:
86:
82:
78:
73:
71:
64:
61:
59:
52:
49:
47:
42:
40:
33:
30:
28:
24:
16:
764:illegitimate
762:
760:
738:indefinitely
736:
731:
690:
644:
640:
634:
631:KentuckyPony
630:
593:
585:
558:
534:
529:
523:
518:
514:
459:
426:
408:
404:
395:User:SunDawn
388:
355:KentuckyPony
351:
296:KentuckyPony
290:— Preceding
270:KentuckyPony
264:— Preceding
201:KentuckyPony
172:KentuckyPony
117:KentuckyPony
74:
65:
62:
53:
50:
43:
34:
31:
20:
536:independent
515:significant
429:✠ SunDawn ✠
317:WP:TEAHOUSE
492:(March 17)
369:articles)
238:WP:DISPUTE
135:WP:TWINKLE
799:(blether)
590:, on the
530:secondary
519:published
435:(contact)
371:Tristario
321:Tristario
313:WP:WEIGHT
249:Tristario
186:Tristario
158:Tristario
96:Tristario
77:Tristario
771:reverted
761:not for
676:(May 12)
646:Teahouse
524:reliable
304:contribs
292:unsigned
278:contribs
266:unsigned
92:WP:MINOR
17:Welcome!
775:deleted
767:reasons
757:allowed
733:blocked
695:or use
629:Hello,
598:or use
794:Summit
759:, but
242:WP:BRD
223:Sonova
215:WP:RGW
154:WP:ORG
146:WP:ORG
131:WP:AFD
791:Girth
705:S0091
641:other
777:.
709:talk
655:talk
610:talk
472:talk
415:~~~~
375:talk
359:talk
325:talk
300:talk
274:talk
253:talk
231:this
227:this
219:here
205:talk
190:talk
176:talk
162:talk
121:talk
100:talk
81:talk
788:.
773:or
285:it?
229:or
25:to
711:)
672::
657:)
612:)
561:.
527:,
521:,
488::
474:)
417:.
393:.
377:)
361:)
327:)
306:)
302:•
280:)
276:•
255:)
207:)
192:)
178:)
164:)
123:)
102:)
83:)
707:(
653:(
608:(
602:.
575:.
470:(
373:(
357:(
323:(
298:(
272:(
251:(
233:.
203:(
188:(
174:(
160:(
119:(
98:(
79:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.