18:
63:
Note that this is tagged as a recreation of a deleted article. That fact has not changed. Better references would certainly help make the argument that the AfD should be revisited: most of the references are press releases. The 2 that are not only have trivial mentions of WizFolio. Please refer
54:
saying why this article should stay. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use
83:
Hi kendric Apple, I have to agree with
Karnesky's commentary above. There appears little in the way of reliable sources even mentioning the subject - it appears to be simply another software package -
26:
34:
56:
51:
87:
37:. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, place the template
73:
22:
30:
41:
65:
84:
69:
90:
77:
17:
50:
the other template on the article and put a note on the page's
59:
instead of continuing to recreate the page. Thank you.
29:from Knowledge (XXG), because it appears to be a
31:repost of material that was previously deleted
8:
7:
14:
16:
91:23:27, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
78:06:00, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
1:
106:
21:A tag has been placed on
25:requesting that it be
97:
46:
40:
35:deletion process
27:speedily deleted
20:
105:
104:
100:
99:
98:
96:
95:
94:
57:deletion review
52:discussion page
44:
38:
12:
11:
5:
103:
101:
81:
80:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
102:
93:
92:
89:
86:
79:
75:
71:
67:
62:
61:
60:
58:
53:
49:
43:
36:
32:
28:
24:
19:
82:
47:
33:following a
15:
48:underneath
85:Peripitus
70:Karnesky
23:Wizfolio
88:(Talk)
42:hangon
66:WP:RS
74:talk
68:. --
64:to
76:)
45:}}
39:{{
72:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
