198:, preceding it) and ends before a timestamp on the same DOM level, does not contain too long passages of text, links to other users' userspace, pages in some specified namespaces, or any external links. Non-timestamped signatures are not caught, because they are just too bloody hard to recognise. Though Unclutter has a bit more relaxed conception of what it considers a timestamp than, for example, Comments in Local Time (which I also use, and therefore took pains that these two scripts work together nicely).
35:
102:
141:
you'll see that your script does some funky things with the section headers and doesn't tidy up the signatures at all... I'm thinking because of the nature of that page, perhaps it is one of the pages your script should be disabled on by default. Next thing I decided to do to see how well it worked
274:
Signatures in the
Teahouse forum are now recognised (but not wrapped by default) when the talkback link script is installed. I could not find the script responsible for the "respond" links, and it does not run for me at all — the reason is beyond me. But it seems to me like a problem that should be
223:
I have IE7, FF21, Chrome, Safari, and Opera that I can test stuff on. I just noticed that the rest of unclutter eats my talk page and makes a mess of my TOC... I am too tired and feeling ill right now, I hate the TB (I watch all talk pages I comment on for awhile and echos are more relaxed than
193:(15.0, on a remote computer, but still; I have to conserve space on my own) while logged out and it also worked without problems. Can you elaborate? Post a screenshot? Have you got any other gadgets enabled which might interfere? Anything interesting in the JavaScript console? Etc.
224:
TBs). As far as what might be interfering, I'm thinking it has something to do with the default site gadget "Ask a question on the
Teahouse" that it isn't getting along well with. I'll take some screenshots in a couple days when I'm feeling better. back to bed for now though...
279:. It might be a bit too aggressive sometimes, and admittedly some pages are not really deserving of it (though in your case, I would remove or at least brighten the background a little, it makes the page a bit harder to read), but I prefer that to talk pages looking like
136:
Hello there! I really like the idea behind your unclutter script (well, at least the signature cleanup part). I've noticed some bugs with the script. I'm viewing
Knowledge with the vector skin on a Win Vista laptop running Firefox 21.0. If you'll take a look at
260:. As you can see by the screen shot it doubles up the "respond to this question" links. It does some other funky stuff on other pages as well, like it destroys my TOC and mangles my design on my talk page. I'll take some screenshots of those things as well.
173:
which was going to end up doing something very similar with an added function to roughly translate non-Latin usernames to a Latin equivalent. Anyways, I look forward to working on developing this with you (if you would like) and hope to hear back from you!
146:
which is a wall of various signatures. Your script does fairly well at catching most of them, although I've noticed some of the formatting still manages to slip through. I would love to work with you on tidying up this script (pushing
285:
Yes, I have seen a few of those. I realise that in such extreme cases a better solution would be probably to actually remove the fancy formatting from the page, but
Userboxpedia has some history suggesting it would not
408:
The only reason to keep the discussion open is if you want to see if anyone else has other options or if others want to endorse some of the existing suggestions. Given the strong "keep" support, this template has a
196:
As of now
Unclutter considers a signature to be a slice of the DOM tree which begins with a link to someone's user space (and optionally some fancy characters, possibly formatted using <span: -->
324:
The script responsible for the "respond" links (which have recently been visually changed to "join this discussion") is a site-wide on-by-default gadget of which the code can be found at
401:
early. The broad consensus seems to be "fix it in each place where it is used improperly" with nobody except you recommending deletion. One editor suggested rewording the template.
280:
398:
170:
143:
355:
325:
300:
257:
425:
276:
202:
209:, or under whatever condition you please. I am not particularly inclined to make any exceptions enabled by default.
43:
429:
77:
60:
21:
114:
The rater tool is absolutely amazing - I've been vaguely hoping for something like this for years. Well done!
340:". I find it less than likely that script will be modified to get along with your script due to it's status.
404:
Until the discussion is closed, every place that this template is used people will see the following text:
374:
345:
265:
229:
179:
119:
79:
275:
fixed in the other script; I have no idea how I could work this around. User talk page reformatting is
333:
360:
319:
305:
289:
247:
214:
48:
421:
370:
341:
261:
240:
225:
175:
115:
70:
17:
81:
101:
435:
378:
364:
349:
309:
293:
269:
251:
233:
218:
183:
123:
82:
410:
160:
148:
212:
Also, are you implying that the rest of
Unclutter functionality is objectionable? :P
138:
414:
399:
Knowledge:Templates for discussion/Log/2013 May 21#Template:Information page
190:
155:
338:"Ask a question" feature for the Wikimedia Foundation's "Teahouse" project
83:
29:
413:'s chance of being deleted as a result of this discussion.
65:
397:
Please consider withdrawing/closing the discussion at
256:
Yeah, sorry, been busy... The
Teahouse screenshot is
171:
User:Technical 13/Scripts/CommonHebrewUserNames.js
189:It works fine on my Chromium. I also tested it on
369:I saw that and have added my thoughts to it.
303:. Still no idea how I could workaround this.
207:wgPageName === 'Knowledge:Teahouse/Questions'
64:
8:
328:. You can (dis|en)able this gadget from the
258:File:Uncluttered_Teahouse_bug_screenshot.jpg
245:So, can you tell me what was the problem?
151:though would make this so much easier
7:
326:MediaWiki:Gadget-teahouse/content.js
301:MediaWiki:Gadget-teahouse/content.js
277:part of the documented functionality
28:
100:
33:
144:WT:Protected_Page_Editor/Tally
1:
169:). I had actually just begun
205:which returns true whenever
451:
334:Preferences → "Gadget" tab
153:
203:write your own processSig
99:
436:17:47, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
379:12:42, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
365:12:02, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
350:11:48, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
310:11:39, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
294:11:32, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
270:10:51, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
252:10:42, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
234:23:11, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
219:22:16, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
184:21:56, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
124:21:02, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
108:The Technical Barnstar
66:start a new discussion
57:do not edit this page.
393:TFD:Information page
41:The following is an
93:A barnstar for you!
201:Remember, you can
434:
433:
323:
312:
299:Ah, there it is.
287:
129:
128:
90:
89:
71:current talk page
442:
419:
418:
363:
332:section of your
317:
308:
298:
292:
284:
250:
244:
217:
208:
197:or <font: -->
165:
163:
104:
97:
96:
84:
68:
51:'s talkpage for
37:
36:
30:
18:User talk:Kephir
450:
449:
445:
444:
443:
441:
440:
439:
395:
359:
304:
288:
246:
238:
213:
206:
167:
161:
159:
134:
95:
86:
85:
80:
61:browse archives
34:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
448:
446:
407:
394:
391:
390:
389:
388:
387:
386:
385:
384:
383:
382:
381:
315:
314:
313:
296:
221:
210:
199:
194:
166:
158:
142:was to hit up
133:
130:
127:
126:
111:
110:
105:
94:
91:
88:
87:
78:
76:
75:
38:
27:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
447:
438:
437:
431:
427:
423:
416:
412:
405:
402:
400:
392:
380:
376:
372:
368:
367:
366:
362:
357:
353:
352:
351:
347:
343:
339:
335:
331:
327:
321:
320:edit conflict
316:
311:
307:
302:
297:
295:
291:
282:
278:
273:
272:
271:
267:
263:
259:
255:
254:
253:
249:
242:
237:
236:
235:
231:
227:
222:
220:
216:
211:
204:
200:
195:
192:
188:
187:
186:
185:
181:
177:
172:
164:
157:
152:
150:
145:
140:
131:
125:
121:
117:
113:
112:
109:
106:
103:
98:
92:
74:
72:
67:
62:
58:
54:
50:
46:
45:
39:
32:
31:
23:
19:
406:
403:
396:
371:Technical 13
342:Technical 13
337:
329:
262:Technical 13
241:Technical 13
226:Technical 13
176:Technical 13
168:
135:
107:
56:
52:
42:
40:
411:WP:SNOWball
356:try my luck
162:Task T27141
156:Phabricator
154:Tracked in
116:Andrew Gray
191:Iceweasel
132:Unclutter
55:. Please
426:contribs
336:titled "
330:Browsing
59:You may
53:May 2013
20: |
415:davidwr
354:I will
69:on the
44:archive
22:archive
430:e-mail
149:T27141
139:WP:THQ
49:Kephir
286:well.
16:<
422:talk
375:talk
361:Keφr
346:talk
306:Keφr
290:Keφr
281:this
266:talk
248:Keφr
230:talk
215:Keφr
180:talk
120:talk
428:)/(
424:)/(
63:or
47:of
377:)
358:.
348:)
283:.
268:)
232:)
182:)
122:)
432:)
420:(
417:/
373:(
344:(
322:)
318:(
264:(
243::
239:@
228:(
178:(
118:(
73:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
