35:
218:", which misses the point of the criterion. (Look how many editors do not understand what "notability" means — it means enough sources exist to base an article upon.) But I do not feel strongly enough about it to push for it.
126:
Instruction manuals. While
Knowledge has descriptions of people, places and things, an article should not read like a "how-to" style owner's manual, advice column (legal, medical or otherwise) or suggestion box.
185:
184:
Hi. I have reverted your bold change here. If you want to pursue it, please propose it on the talk page and see if there is a consensus. I think "Made up" ties in neatly with
214:, while the speedy deletion criteria are often pointed at to people who might not necessarily get it. I expect many newbies to cling to the "made up" wording by replying "
146:
Emphasis mine. The phrasing is very broad and generic, but the applicability rather evident. Listing all the calls is out of scope. We have
98:
188:, and as the actual definition is clear I don't think there is a serious danger of people trying to use it for fiction. Regards,
161:#3, and probably an acceptable reference. (To make a link, just wrap it in square brackets, put a space and link description:
154:) for that. (And why not just use RBIL directly instead of the "content-free encyclopaedia that anyone can vandalise"?)
97:
What section of WP:NOTMANUAL makes you call this RBIL? I can't seem to find where a list of commands falls under that.
131:, game guides, and recipes. Describing to the reader how other people or things use or do something is encyclopedic;
116:#6 (Directories, directory entries, electronic program guide, or a resource for conducting business) may also apply.
43:
215:
77:
60:
21:
102:
79:
220:
167:
48:
211:
207:
193:
113:
70:
17:
81:
158:
224:
197:
171:
106:
82:
178:
203:
189:
123:
guidebook, or textbook. Knowledge articles should not read like:
83:
29:
151:
147:
65:
162:
139:. Such guides may be welcome at Wikibooks instead.
157:RBIL itself is an acceptable external link per
186:WP:Knowledge is not for things made up one day
64:
8:
129:This includes tutorials, instruction manuals
119:Knowledge is an encyclopedic reference,
165:. Citations are a bit tougher beast.)
7:
212:jargon waiting to be misunderstood
28:
137:how to use or do something is not
112:The very first. And maybe sixth.
33:
1:
225:12:10, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
198:11:46, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
172:07:40, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
135:in the imperative mood about
107:01:04, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
241:
121:not an instruction manual
133:instructing the reader
66:start a new discussion
57:do not edit this page.
210:" just reads like a
93:Int 13h - RBIL list.
41:The following is an
90:
89:
71:current talk page
232:
223:
170:
84:
68:
51:'s talkpage for
37:
36:
30:
18:User talk:Kephir
240:
239:
235:
234:
233:
231:
230:
229:
219:
182:
166:
95:
86:
85:
80:
61:browse archives
34:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
238:
236:
228:
227:
216:But it's true!
181:
176:
175:
174:
155:
144:
143:
142:
141:
140:
99:63.140.103.226
94:
91:
88:
87:
78:
76:
75:
38:
27:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
237:
226:
222:
217:
213:
209:
205:
202:
201:
200:
199:
195:
191:
187:
180:
177:
173:
169:
164:
160:
156:
153:
149:
145:
138:
134:
130:
125:
124:
122:
118:
117:
115:
111:
110:
109:
108:
104:
100:
92:
74:
72:
67:
62:
58:
54:
53:November 2013
50:
46:
45:
39:
32:
31:
23:
19:
183:
136:
132:
128:
120:
96:
56:
52:
42:
40:
204:User:JohnCD
152:Wikiversity
150:(and maybe
206:: To me, "
179:WP:CSD#A11
208:WP:MADEUP
163:like this
148:Wikibooks
114:WP:NOTDIR
55:. Please
159:WP:ELYES
59:You may
20: |
69:on the
44:archive
22:archive
190:JohnCD
49:Kephir
16:<
221:Keφr
194:talk
168:Keφr
103:talk
63:or
47:of
196:)
105:)
192:(
101:(
73:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.