218:
third-party sources. Also, the notability guidelines talk about having reached at least one country's official national charts. Beatport, iTunes, etc. are not official national charts and therefore do not meet the notability guidelines – I have numerous DJ friends who have records out on
Beatport and who have taken part in DJ competitions, but they wouldn't be considered notable. So in order to prove Starkillers' notability for a Knowledge (XXG) article, the sources should not include anything from his website or social media, no non-official charts, and no information from personal blogs or gossip websites. In short, the information would need to come from newspapers, music magazines, independent music websites with an editorial team, and chart positions from national charts. Hope this helps.
890:. I wanted your suggestion on whether this would be appropriate to include in the page. Not sure if it is relevant. Let me know your thoughts on this! Also, I have started adding content under EDC as well. There is a lot of credible sources out there for EDC so it may take me a day or two to finish this section as I want to ensure I do proper research on this. I will then start with The Crystal Method section after. I have yet to finish Starkillers section so you may see some incomplete areas, should I write a small notice that I have yet to complete those areas? I am going back and forth between different sections to switch up the research :)
765:. For instance, the radio show. Does it involve Las Vegas performers? Is it taped in Las Vegas? Are there other EDM radio shows, and how has this one uniquely had an influence on EDM? Are other writers talking about the show? Right now you're veering off again towards PROMO, so try to tie what you're writing back to notable, encyclopedic content. It might end up being necessary to cut some of the details of individual album releases, for instance, to get this through AfC. —
447:
684:) Hi Biranhe I wanted to ask for your help in terms of editing the references on the Las Vegas EDM page. So as I see there's a specific format followed at the end of the page under references. So for the references that I add, how do I ensure the same format is consistent and connect the information pieces properly to the references section. Please let me know so I don't mess up connecting the references properly :) Thank you!
1213:) Hello Jytdog! Thank you the info. I have compeleted the COI disclosure on my user page, please let me know if there is any other information I should add. And yes absolutely Brianhe mentioned the process perviously and I have no problem going though WP:AFC and the peer review processes. I believe this would be good for the page as well to ensure all sources are good enough to back up any information provided. Thank you!
404:
23:
473:
notable by
Knowledge (XXG)'s standards, and of which Terranova is indisputably a part. Individual items in a larger article don't have to meet notability criteria, so by this standard Terranova and Crystal Method would likely have their own subsections if it turns out, as I read in one source, that they are the two biggest artists to come out of Las Vegas. Example sources:
337:
144:
520:) Hi Brianhe! This sounds great! So just to clarify we should create Las Vegas EDM first, and then a Starkillers page which is a subsection to Las Vegas EDM? Thank you for starting this! I will contribute my research to it as well. Please let me know if I should still create a Kiran Chandani/Starkillers page based on your comment on your talk page. Thank you! :)
96:
towards the page in any way. Whoever edited the page may have failed to meet some of the wiki guidelines. As you suggested I have tried to contact the admin who deleted the page but I havn't heard any response yet. Is there any help from your end the article can recieve? Maybe the original editors did not cite things properly or did not use appropriate language.
617:) oh I see! ok yes that sounds good. I will go ahead and add factual based information along with references for each under the Nick Terranova Section. Thank you for this I will review those guidelines shortly. Please give me a day to add to the Nick Terranova section! I will inform you as soon as I have completed adding all the information that I researched.
316:) Hi Richard! Thank you for the info on Sandbox. I have already collected sufficient references and broke it down to the Musician notability criterion based on the Wiki guidelines but yes I will definitely start with Sandbox before posting on main wikipedia so I get all the formatting correct. I will be posting this soon! Thank you! :)
576:) I went through the Las Vegas EDM article its very well sourced. I will do some more research to see if there's other references and pieces of information that can be added. I see that for The Crystal Method you added the page for their Knowledge (XXG), is that the direction we are going with Starkillers page as well?
112:
You just recently posted on his talk page, so we would have to give him more time to answer the post. If he doesn't answer you can petition DRV for article re-creation in the mainspace, although it'd probably be better if you asked for it to be userfied and run through AfC. I might be able to get you
1161:
The way we manage COI has two steps. Disclosure is the first step, which you have started to do, which is great. It would be ideal if you would add: "Because of my relationship with Brawla, I have a conflict of interest in
Knowledge (XXG) with regard to them and Starkillers, a band on the label."
815:
to see what varieties they had listed, to check myself and see that the list I developed myself wasn't unbalanced. If I'd listed 20 regional varieties of
American English and just one item for British English, that would have been unbalanced, and would have reflected my bias as a speaker of American
217:
Basically, Knowledge (XXG) discourages the use of any self-published source by the person in question for use in an article about them. This includes not just his personal website, but also
Facebook, Twitter or other social media that he may use – Knowledge (XXG) encourages material from independent
707:
has an example of what I mean about not worrying about ref tags at first. Sometimes, getting wiki markup just right gets in the way of content creation. In your case, as tthe subject matter expert, your most important contributions are content, not formatting. There are plenty of wikignomes who can
293:
You may want to use your sandbox to build up your argument and to collect sources – if you are logged in under your username you will see "Sandbox" in the menu right at the top of the screen, towards the right hand side. Clicking on that will bring you to your own personal "play area" where you can
472:
Looking for sources, my 30-minute assessment is that if you don't come up with something solid in a major magazine or newspaper about
Terranova, it may not pass the notability bar when it's reviewed. I think a more fruitful direction may be to focus on the Las Vegas EDM scene, which is most likely
1126:
Hello
Brianhe! Hope you're doing well. I see the article got rejected, I will continue to improve it and add more sources before resubmission. However, would it be ok to create a separate article for Starkillers at this time with contribution from other writers too hopefully? Let me know what you
1097:
Hello
Brianhe! Seems like I wasn't receiving notifications for this in my email. Finals are in a few weeks so I've been swamped. I will finish it as much as I can in the next few hours and then we can submit it so others can continue to contribute as needed! Let me know if you think this is ok :)
806:
for instance), so my rough advice at this time is to try to balance coverage of each thing relative every another thing. In other words, you might try to expand
Crystal Method's place in LV EDM history, or find another artist of similar stature to Starkillers and include a bit more on them before
1165:
The second step is a form of peer review. This piece may seem a bit strange to you at first, but if you think about it, it will make sense. In
Knowledge (XXG), editors can immediately publish their work, with no intervening publisher or standard peer review -- you ~can~ just create an article,
1030:
Hey Brianhe! How's it going? Yes I am still continuing my internship. However, this semester I am also enrolled in full time university classes so I've had less time to work on the wikipedia page than I thought I would. Please give me some more time to finish it. I added more to the EDC and pool
95:
hello I have changed my username with your guidance. Thank you for this. I am just ensuring the right info is out there. I am new to wikipedia. Regarding the Starkillers page I have no connection or contact with the original editors / other editors of the page whatsoever, nor have I contributed
1174:
it publishes. This is what you have been advised to do b) And if you want to change content in an existing article on a topic where you have a COI (for instance, on the Starkillers article, once it is created) we ask you to propose content on the Talk page for others to review and implement
856:
looks like a very good source for why LV scene isn't for everyone (negative comments also contribute to notability). And there's a new movie about LV EDM, search for "edm-sploitation" for some interesting comments. If you're not familiar with American 1970s cinema, it refers ironically to the
782:
ok! I will do some more research on the Radio Show to find suitable references, if there are not enough references then I will take the KillerRadio section out. Once I have added all the info on my end, I will do a thorough review to ensure everything is well references and there is no use of
745:
Hi Brianhe I have started adding content under Starkillers section for the Las Vegas EDM draft. I still have to add more content and references please keep the headers in bold under his section that I left incomplete so I can add further content to it! Let me know if this looks ok so far :)
591:
I think the right thing is to go ahead and develop it as it stands. Then when we think we're nearly complete, we can decide if Starkillers needs a new article. That would expose the new article to its own notability criteria, which might not be wise. You might want to review
209:
Kiran – following on from postdlf's reply to you on his talk page, I thought I would add my own thoughts here, as it's disrespectful of me to keep butting in on his own talk page. Apart from the guidelines he has already suggested you look at, you might want to check out
807:
building out the section on Starkillers. I tried to give you some other starting points with the stuff on pool parties and the annual EDC event (hint, are there top billers at EDC who have appeared over several years?). A concrete example from my own work under way: In
133:
thank you! so when you say re-creation you mean anyone can recreate it and put it up for AfC before it can go to mainspace? Also what is the undeletion process then? Sorry for so many questions new to wikipedia so just ensuring I have all the terminology right!
797:
One more thing for tonight. It's not just avoiding promotional wording like "he's a really awesome artist" or something that blatant. Just having too much content towards one particular individual, or in this case, his body of work, might be seen as violating
243:
I can provide much more 3rd party sources than that to prove his notability. Would you think it would be a good idea for me to put this up on "Articles of Creation" as another admin had suggested me? That way other editors can pick it up and contribute to it.
248:
No, I think postdlf is correct, you can't submit an article for creation a second time once it has been deleted, you have to make a case for it to be reverted. The Belgian chart is the Tip chart, which isn't the main chart: it's the equivalent of the
366:
173:
961:! So sorry I haven't been on Knowledge (XXG) since the weekend. I will add more content to EDC and The chemical method after class tonight! Please let them Know if you can that I'll still be adding more content to it! Thank you :)
1166:
click save, and viola there is a new article, and you can go into any article, make changes, click save, and done. No intermediary. What we ask editors who have a COI to do, is a) if you create an article, submit it through the
878:
Welcome back! I will read the article from rolling stones shortly! I wanted to ask you, if you got a chance to look at these articles about the Starkillers and Avicii controversy that took place over social media fairly recently:
372:
179:
918:
for his track Pressure alongside Nadia Ali and Alex Kenji that has its own wikipedia page, it has the awards and charts section with the table formatting, is that ok if I pick the formatting from there? Please let me know!
833:
yes absolutely that makes sense! I will add to other sections on the page as well and keep in mind the relativity. Thank you for your advice on this, its really helping me learn a lot about Knowledge (XXG) as well :)
1153:
Hi Kiran. You have disclosed on your User page that you are a volunteer working for Brawla Records and Starkillers. Please be aware that you still have a conflict of interest in Knowledge (XXG); if you read
1179:
it goes live, instead of doing it directly yourself. You can make the edit request easily - and provide notice to the community of your request - by using the "edit request" function as described in the
379:
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
186:
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
702:
to turn a URL into a ref, add them at the end of the references section, and in the article body refer to it by author or publication name in plain text. We can worry about getting actual <ref: -->
938:. I hope we'll hear from someone soon. Looking at the current article, I think the discography is unbalanced and they probably will ask for it to be removed or moved to a separate discography
967:
Hey, it looks like you've gone away for a bit. Are you still interested in working on this? By the way you don't have to preface your reply with my username; I'm watching this page. —
1162:
Once the draft article is created in your sandbox, you should also disclose your COI on the Talk page. Brianhe or I can help you with that, once the draft is started - just ping me.
341:
148:
1158:
you can see that what matters is that you have a relationship external to Knowledge (XXG), and you are here wanting to edit about the entity with which you have a relationship.
253:
Bubbling Under chart, i.e. new records likely to make the main chart. I've no idea where that UK chart position comes from either, as the UK chart only goes up to 100.
42:. Examples of usernames that are not allowed include "XYZ Company", "MyWidgetsUSA.com", and "Trammel Museum of Art". However, you are invited to use a username that
75:, that complies with our username policy. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. Thank you.
849:
408:
1059:
Hey Brianhe! Sorry I was away for a bit. I want to revise it once before submitting! Can we submit early next week if possible? Please let me know. Thanks!
211:
239:) thank you so much for this info this really helps Richard! This is one of his hit tracks right here with its own Wiki page that charted in Belgium:
460:
981:
Hey Brianhe! Yes still working on this, I was away on vacation this past week so I am back now and I will be able to finish it by this week!
635:(AfC) process next, as is appropriate when you have a relationship wih the subject. Which you do, even though it is an unpaid internship. —
54:
474:
935:
371:
365:
178:
172:
412:
58:
46:
such a name if it identifies you personally, such as "Mark at WidgetsUSA", "Jack Smith at the XY Foundation", and "WidgetFan87".
113:
an AfC copy, although you'd probably still have to run it through Postdlf or DRV before submitting it to the mainspace, though.
542:
Yes, the Nick Terranova section is already there. That's where additional material on him and his music or label can be added.
477:
294:
try out various things, collect information and work on articles, without altering anything on the main Knowledge (XXG) site.
1080:
Checking in again. Maybe even if you're busy, it's best to submit it and let other people continue to work on the article? –
850:
http://www.rollingstone.com/music/news/fatboy-slim-on-the-american-edm-scene-the-vegas-side-of-it-really-isnt-for-me-20130319
563:) ok! I have references for that researched already. I'm slightly confused so should we create a separate page for him still?
66:
57:
any company, group, organization, product, or website, regardless of your username. Moreover, I recommend that you read our
880:
886:
1188:
Will you please complete the COI disclosure on your user page, and agree to follow the peer review processes? Thanks!
50:
35:
70:
888:
884:
939:
808:
495:
61:. If you are a single individual and are willing to contribute to Knowledge (XXG) in an unbiased manner, please
62:
985:
656:) Yes absolutely! You mentioned this process previously and it definitely makes sense to go through WP:AFC.
349:
156:
1010:
348:
and Knowledge (XXG) pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to
345:
155:
and Knowledge (XXG) pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to
152:
313:
299:
275:
261:
236:
223:
117:
79:
40:
may not use a username that represents the name of a company, group, organization, product, or website
882:
431:) Hello thank you for this! The admins are aware of this I have posted on DRV with their guidance :)
1214:
1128:
1099:
1060:
1032:
920:
891:
835:
784:
747:
726:
685:
657:
618:
577:
521:
432:
317:
279:
97:
537:
799:
762:
1117:
1085:
1050:
1018:
993:
972:
947:
866:
821:
770:
713:
681:
653:
640:
614:
601:
573:
560:
547:
517:
503:
484:
453:
446:
428:
420:
388:
195:
256:
You should add four tildes after your comments in order to add your signature and timestamp.
1245:
1232:
1210:
1193:
858:
309:
295:
271:
257:
232:
219:
130:
114:
92:
76:
1181:
1167:
1155:
632:
593:
1031:
parties section last week. I will be finishing up the artists section this week! Thanks!
363:
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (
170:
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (
1009:
Justwondering if your internship is still ongoing, and if you still plan to work on
1113:
1081:
1046:
1014:
989:
968:
958:
943:
915:
875:
862:
830:
817:
779:
766:
742:
722:
709:
677:
649:
636:
610:
597:
569:
556:
543:
513:
499:
480:
424:
416:
384:
191:
407:
This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at
1241:
1228:
1206:
1189:
27:
240:
1236:
1222:
1197:
1136:
1121:
1107:
1089:
1068:
1054:
1040:
1022:
997:
976:
951:
928:
899:
870:
843:
825:
792:
774:
755:
734:
717:
693:
665:
644:
626:
605:
585:
551:
529:
507:
488:
440:
392:
325:
303:
287:
265:
227:
199:
124:
105:
86:
802:(undue weight). This is really subjective and I've been hit by it before (
336:
143:
49:
Please also note that Knowledge (XXG) does not allow accounts to be
700:
357:
164:
1227:
Beautiful. Thanks for dealing with this graciously. Good luck!
594:
Notability guidelines do not apply to content within an article
278:) Ok I will build an argument on DRV thank you for your help!
212:
Knowledge (XXG):Biographies of living persons#Reliable sources
725:
ok sounds good! I'll go ahead and add content. Thank you! :)
26:
Welcome to Knowledge (XXG). I saw that you edited or created
463:
at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
445:
934:
Ive asked for feedback from multiple sources, including
803:
704:
415:
incident in which you may be involved. Thank you.
761:
Careful when you're working on this to be mindful of
398:
Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion
1112:Sounds good. Good luck to both of us on the AfC. -
848:One more thing and it's back to wikibreak for me.
631:Just as a reminder, we shall be going through the
241:https://en.wikipedia.org/Pressure_(Nadia_Ali_song)
452:Hello, Kiran chandani. You have new messages at
409:Knowledge (XXG):Conflict of interest/Noticeboard
988:has some feedback for us from a third party. —
8:
498:. You're welcome of course to edit there. —
596:guideline to see what I'm talking about. —
352:. There are two ways to do this. Either:
159:. There are two ways to do this. Either:
1149:Conflict of interest in Knowledge (XXG)
360:( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
167:( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
30:, and I noticed that your username, "
7:
783:promotional language. Thank you! :)
1127:think! I can work on both articles.
14:
423:) 15:20, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
1045:Want to submit this to AfC yet?
402:
375:) located above the edit window.
370:
364:
335:
205:Starkillers and reliable sources
182:) located above the edit window.
177:
171:
142:
21:
55:may not advocate for or promote
1237:01:49, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
1223:01:28, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
1198:01:00, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
1182:conflict of interest guideline
1170:process so it can be reviewed
998:17:03, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
984:Great. In case you missed it,
977:05:24, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
952:22:19, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
929:03:15, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
900:06:14, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
871:05:51, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
844:03:27, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
826:03:21, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
793:03:01, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
775:02:56, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
756:01:39, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
735:22:34, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
718:13:28, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
694:06:24, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
666:01:24, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
645:01:14, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
627:00:33, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
606:00:29, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
586:00:25, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
552:00:26, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
530:00:19, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
508:23:58, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
489:20:55, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
441:17:15, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
59:conflict of interest guideline
1:
1122:09:43, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
1108:04:38, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
1090:10:42, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
393:16:12, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
326:21:08, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
304:21:02, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
288:16:24, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
266:16:20, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
228:16:01, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
200:06:26, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
125:04:04, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
106:03:46, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
87:06:00, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
1137:03:27, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
1069:01:13, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
1055:16:21, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
816:English. See what I mean? —
1041:20:02, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
1023:18:18, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
699:Just use the Yardkard tool
34:", may not comply with our
1269:
809:Draft:Varieties of English
708:worry about the latter. —
496:User:Brianhe/Las Vegas EDM
344:. When you add content to
342:welcome to Knowledge (XXG)
151:. When you add content to
149:welcome to Knowledge (XXG)
494:I went ahead and started
51:shared by multiple people
1218:
1132:
1103:
1064:
1036:
986:Draft talk:Las Vegas EDM
924:
895:
839:
788:
751:
730:
689:
661:
622:
581:
525:
436:
321:
283:
101:
1013:. If not, that's fine.
813:Encyclopedia Brittanica
38:. Please note that you
450:
633:articles for creation
449:
411:regarding a possible
936:WT:WikiProject Music
413:conflict of interest
63:create a new account
1011:Draft:Las Vegas EDM
454:Brianhe's talk page
461:remove this notice
451:
67:change of username
541:
331:Your recent edits
138:Your recent edits
1260:
859:blacksploitation
535:
464:
406:
405:
374:
368:
339:
181:
175:
146:
121:
83:
69:, by completing
25:
24:
1268:
1267:
1263:
1262:
1261:
1259:
1258:
1257:
1151:
470:
465:
458:
403:
400:
350:sign your posts
333:
207:
157:sign your posts
140:
119:
81:
53:, and that you
36:username policy
22:
19:
12:
11:
5:
1266:
1264:
1256:
1255:
1254:
1253:
1252:
1251:
1250:
1249:
1215:Kiran chandani
1201:
1200:
1150:
1147:
1146:
1145:
1144:
1143:
1142:
1141:
1140:
1139:
1129:Kiran chandani
1100:Kiran chandani
1078:
1077:
1076:
1075:
1074:
1073:
1072:
1071:
1061:Kiran chandani
1033:Kiran chandani
1007:
1006:
1005:
1004:
1003:
1002:
1001:
1000:
955:
954:
921:Kiran chandani
913:
912:
911:
910:
909:
908:
907:
906:
905:
904:
903:
902:
892:Kiran chandani
836:Kiran chandani
785:Kiran chandani
748:Kiran chandani
740:
739:
738:
737:
727:Kiran chandani
686:Kiran chandani
675:
674:
673:
672:
671:
670:
669:
668:
658:Kiran chandani
619:Kiran chandani
578:Kiran chandani
567:
566:
565:
564:
522:Kiran chandani
511:
510:
469:
466:
457:
444:
433:Kiran chandani
399:
396:
377:
376:
361:
332:
329:
318:Kiran chandani
307:
306:
280:Kiran chandani
269:
268:
254:
206:
203:
184:
183:
168:
139:
136:
128:
127:
109:
108:
98:Kiran chandani
18:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1265:
1248:Thank you! :)
1247:
1243:
1240:
1239:
1238:
1234:
1230:
1226:
1225:
1224:
1220:
1216:
1212:
1208:
1205:
1204:
1203:
1202:
1199:
1195:
1191:
1187:
1186:
1185:
1183:
1178:
1173:
1169:
1163:
1159:
1157:
1148:
1138:
1134:
1130:
1125:
1124:
1123:
1119:
1115:
1111:
1110:
1109:
1105:
1101:
1096:
1095:
1094:
1093:
1092:
1091:
1087:
1083:
1070:
1066:
1062:
1058:
1057:
1056:
1052:
1048:
1044:
1043:
1042:
1038:
1034:
1029:
1028:
1027:
1026:
1025:
1024:
1020:
1016:
1012:
999:
995:
991:
987:
983:
982:
980:
979:
978:
974:
970:
966:
965:
964:
963:
962:
960:
953:
949:
945:
941:
937:
933:
932:
931:
930:
926:
922:
917:
901:
897:
893:
889:
887:
885:
883:
881:
877:
874:
873:
872:
868:
864:
860:
855:
854:Rolling Stone
851:
847:
846:
845:
841:
837:
832:
829:
828:
827:
823:
819:
814:
810:
805:
801:
796:
795:
794:
790:
786:
781:
778:
777:
776:
772:
768:
764:
760:
759:
758:
757:
753:
749:
744:
736:
732:
728:
724:
721:
720:
719:
715:
711:
706:
705:This revision
701:
698:
697:
696:
695:
691:
687:
683:
679:
667:
663:
659:
655:
651:
648:
647:
646:
642:
638:
634:
630:
629:
628:
624:
620:
616:
612:
609:
608:
607:
603:
599:
595:
590:
589:
588:
587:
583:
579:
575:
571:
562:
558:
555:
554:
553:
549:
545:
539:
538:edit conflict
534:
533:
532:
531:
527:
523:
519:
515:
509:
505:
501:
497:
493:
492:
491:
490:
486:
482:
478:
475:
468:Las Vegas EDM
467:
462:
455:
448:
443:
442:
438:
434:
430:
426:
422:
418:
414:
410:
397:
395:
394:
390:
386:
383:Thank you. --
381:
373:
367:
362:
359:
355:
354:
353:
351:
347:
343:
338:
330:
328:
327:
323:
319:
315:
311:
305:
301:
297:
292:
291:
290:
289:
285:
281:
277:
273:
267:
263:
259:
255:
252:
247:
246:
245:
242:
238:
234:
230:
229:
225:
221:
215:
213:
204:
202:
201:
197:
193:
190:Thank you. --
188:
180:
174:
169:
166:
162:
161:
160:
158:
154:
150:
145:
137:
135:
132:
126:
123:
122:
116:
111:
110:
107:
103:
99:
94:
91:
90:
89:
88:
85:
84:
78:
74:
73:
68:
65:or request a
64:
60:
56:
52:
47:
45:
41:
37:
33:
32:Brawlarecords
29:
17:Your username
16:
1176:
1171:
1164:
1160:
1152:
1079:
1008:
956:
940:list article
914:
853:
812:
741:
703:tags later.
676:
568:
512:
471:
401:
382:
378:
334:
308:
270:
250:
231:
216:
208:
189:
185:
141:
129:
118:
80:
71:
48:
43:
39:
31:
20:
1098:Thank you!
310:Richard3120
296:Richard3120
272:Richard3120
258:Richard3120
233:Richard3120
220:Richard3120
131:Tokyogirl79
115:Tokyogirl79
93:Tokyogirl79
77:Tokyogirl79
28:Starkillers
861:genre. --
811:I went to
346:talk pages
340:Hello and
153:talk pages
147:Hello and
356:Add four
251:Billboard
214:as well.
163:Add four
72:this form
800:WP:UNDUE
763:WP:UNDUE
459:You can
44:contains
1114:Brianhe
1082:Brianhe
1047:Brianhe
1015:Brianhe
990:Brianhe
969:Brianhe
959:Brianhe
944:Brianhe
916:Brianhe
876:Brianhe
863:Brianhe
831:Brianhe
818:Brianhe
780:Brianhe
767:Brianhe
743:Brianhe
723:Brianhe
710:Brianhe
678:Brianhe
650:Brianhe
637:Brianhe
611:Brianhe
598:Brianhe
570:Brianhe
557:Brianhe
544:Brianhe
514:Brianhe
500:Brianhe
481:Brianhe
425:Brianhe
417:Brianhe
385:SineBot
192:SineBot
120:(｡◕‿◕｡)
82:(｡◕‿◕｡)
1242:Jytdog
1229:Jytdog
1207:Jytdog
1190:Jytdog
1177:before
1172:before
1168:WP:AFC
1156:WP:COI
358:tildes
165:tildes
852:From
1246:talk
1233:talk
1219:talk
1211:talk
1194:talk
1184:.
1133:talk
1118:talk
1104:talk
1086:talk
1065:talk
1051:talk
1037:talk
1019:talk
994:talk
973:talk
948:talk
942:. —
925:talk
896:talk
867:talk
840:talk
822:talk
804:here
789:talk
771:talk
752:talk
731:talk
714:talk
690:talk
682:talk
662:talk
654:talk
641:talk
623:talk
615:talk
602:talk
582:talk
574:talk
561:talk
548:talk
526:talk
518:talk
504:talk
485:talk
479:. —
437:talk
429:talk
421:talk
389:talk
322:talk
314:talk
300:talk
284:talk
276:talk
262:talk
237:talk
224:talk
196:talk
102:talk
957:Hi
369:or
176:or
1235:)
1221:)
1196:)
1135:)
1120:)
1106:)
1088:)
1067:)
1053:)
1039:)
1021:)
996:)
975:)
950:)
927:)
898:)
869:)
842:)
824:)
791:)
773:)
754:)
733:)
716:)
692:)
664:)
643:)
625:)
604:)
584:)
550:)
528:)
506:)
487:)
476:,
439:)
391:)
324:)
302:)
286:)
264:)
226:)
198:)
104:)
1244:(
1231:(
1217:(
1209:(
1192:(
1131:(
1116:(
1102:(
1084:(
1063:(
1049:(
1035:(
1017:(
992:(
971:(
946:(
923:(
894:(
865:(
838:(
820:(
787:(
769:(
750:(
729:(
712:(
688:(
680:(
660:(
652:(
639:(
621:(
613:(
600:(
580:(
572:(
559:(
546:(
540:)
536:(
524:(
516:(
502:(
483:(
456:.
435:(
427:(
419:(
387:(
320:(
312:(
298:(
282:(
274:(
260:(
235:(
222:(
194:(
100:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
