Knowledge (XXG)

User talk:Klocek

Source đź“ť

449: 299:
appear, seemingly from nowhere. When there is activity on the article, especially if it's controversial, many editors make their appearance. Lately it's mostly been professional acupuncturists trying to whitewash the article of anything negative, regardless of how well sourced. (We know who they are because when they first appeared they admitted they were recruited professional acupuncturists. Some of them are also teachers of acupuncture.) --
27: 405: 535: 199: 931: 228:
on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit
760:
Well, I was I guess what you call a lurker since the early 2000's. I think it took me a full six years before I even made a post! That's just how I am. Besides, I'm really busy and don't have much time for Knowledge (XXG) editing. But recently I had surgery and, during my recovery, have had nothing
145:
Translation: the cabal of sceptics has noticed that you pose a threat to their monopoly on Knowledge (XXG) viewpoints and, being the thugs we are, we will do everything we can to force you into submission, including coordinated tag team reverts of your edits and trying to scare you into not making
298:
That article has been on my watchlist for many years. At the top of my watchlist is this notice: "You have 9,565 pages on your watchlist (excluding talk pages)." I have edited far more pages than that. Lots of other editors have it on their watchlists as well, so it's no coincidence when others
279:
Wow, you've never made an edit on the acupuncture page, but all of a sudden, out of nowhere, you come along and do so, along with several others who've never cared to edit there before. All within seconds. What a coincidence, I mustn't go outside today for I'm likely to be stuck by lightening.
122:
Your edits are controversial and definitely do cross the line of what's covered by the "discretionary sanctions" mentioned above. I suggest you be VERY careful or you'll get blocked, regardless of whether you're right or not. We edit collaboratively here, and that means we don't always get our
620:
I was blocked because someone feels like I'm another user named DVMt. I don't know what else to say, but no evidence was presented that I could see regarding this. If there's something else I need to do, please whoever reads this, let me know, I'm excited to start editing again.
726:
After the 48-hour block, the first this user has ever had, he made no further edits, much less any which would justify an upgrade of the block. It seems reasonable to give the user a fair chance to forge a more collegial working style (i.e. discuss on talk page rather than edit
376:
I appreciate your intent, but conciseness and clarity are paramount. An "epistemological struggle for truth" is what everyone is engaged in. It seemed to me that the wording, "an inner struggle" is clearer. I hope you don't mind that I reverted to the original wording.
83:. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. 730:
The suggestion that this is a sleeper account seems to me to be completely baseless. Enthusiastic editing after a period of uninvolvement with WP is not in itself remarkable or extraordinary and is certainly not proof of anything like sock puppetry.
684:, but there's no way that this is anything but a sleeper account. 10 edits in a burst the day of account creation, an eight-year gap, and then leaping in to restore the edits of another account that I blocked doesn't lead to any other conclusions.— 843:
Oh so that's how wikipedia handles these claims? Very interesting! I made a joke earlier about "wikipedia crime" but there is actually something like a Knowledge (XXG) court! Anyway, thanks Tgeorgescu for submitting my name on my
263:
I suggest you follow BRD and discuss your controversial edits on the talk page. Only after you get consensus will they be accepted. Trying to force your changes into the article, even if you're right, will not work. --
761:
else to do but sit at home and try and make edits to some pages I think really need it. If I had known it was a wikipedia crime to take so much time off from editing, I probably would've just created a new account!
698:"then leaping in to restore the edits of another account that I blocked doesn't lead to any other conclusions." Whose edits, specifically, are you claiming I restored? I don't recall restoring anyone's edits. 123:
personal edits accepted. It's no fun, but that's the way it works here. For your information, I'm going to add a template below with some links and instructions. I suggest you read it very carefully. --
37: 890:
I have submitted your name because strange stuff was going on, so I had a reasonable suspicion that sockpuppetry was happening. It might turn out as an occasion to clear your name.
409: 49: 172:
What other accounts have you used before this one? Your paranoia sounds very familiar and doesn't address the problems with your editing and lack of collaboration. --
954: 672:
template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.
800: 245: 988: 657: 497: 64: 575: 94: 503: 237: 72: 1002: 55:
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means
511: 253: 976: 481: 257: 16:
Welcome everyone! Feel free to post here and ask me any questions that you might have. I hope I can be of some assistance.
325:
will help you with formatting. Additionally the journal "medical hypothesis" has been deemed to not be a reliable source.
68: 570: 429: 338: 939: 548: 515: 456: 216: 80: 542: 76: 547:
Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the
90: 963: 958: 950: 477: 469: 465: 413: 356:. Read that too. Other types of material, including notable opinions, don't need to be from review articles. -- 249: 221: 210: 60: 433: 342: 104:
Thanks for the notice, but it doesn't appear that their decision impacts any edits I will be making. Thanks!
384:
for the link to do so...I think under the User tab at the top. Perhaps I can help you weather the storms!
361: 304: 269: 177: 128: 507: 241: 1006: 56: 408:
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
85:
This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.
895: 808: 589: 998: 322: 736: 389: 380:
By the way, I'd be happy to help you find your feet here. You can email me by wiki-email, see my
353: 357: 300: 265: 173: 124: 59:
administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the
720:
I strongly recommend dropping the extended ban, which seems unreasonable on several grounds.
982: 975:. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may 666: 487: 425: 334: 972: 891: 804: 523: 448: 993: 752: 225: 45: 26: 732: 689: 644: 385: 381: 41: 352:
That particularly applies to strong medical claims and other scientific facts, per
236:
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's
233:—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. 845: 796: 762: 699: 622: 553: 473: 417: 326: 281: 206: 147: 105: 198: 519: 146:
posts at all by unjustifiably threatening you with blocks or bans if you do.
480:. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may 685: 321:
Please only use review articles that are pubmed indexed. Also this page
930: 795:
Now there are two sleeper accounts which have been revived for editing
680:
I'm the one that upgraded the block. I may have misidentified the sock
248:
for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant
1010: 899: 853: 812: 770: 755: 740: 707: 693: 647: 630: 527: 437: 393: 365: 346: 308: 289: 273: 181: 155: 132: 113: 98: 971:, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans 224:, which states that an editor must not perform more than three 925: 412:
regarding a possible violation of Knowledge (XXG)'s policy on
48:, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is 533: 447: 197: 510:. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek 654:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please
674:
Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
410:
Knowledge (XXG):Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring
603: 599: 593: 584: 580: 566: 562: 558: 215:
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being
514:, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request 541:
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an
256:. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary 476:. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to 955:Knowledge (XXG):Sockpuppet investigations/Klocek 643:Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. 484:by adding the following text below this notice: 240:to work toward making a version that represents 231:even if you don't violate the three-revert rule 801:Knowledge (XXG):Sockpuppet investigations/DVMt 71:. Administrators may impose sanctions such as 399:Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion 20:Discretionary sanctions notice: Pseudoscience 8: 723:Many of his edits seem completely innocuous. 209:shows that you are currently engaged in an 502:During a dispute, you should first try to 436:) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 345:) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 36:The Arbitration Committee has authorised 751:Can you explain why you came back now? 33:Please carefully read this information: 7: 987:below. However, you should read the 957:. Note that multiple accounts are 14: 929: 403: 25: 496:. However, you should read the 220:—especially if you violate the 205:Your recent editing history at 40:to be used for pages regarding 1: 945:from editing for a period of 504:discuss controversial changes 460:from editing for a period of 545:, who declined the request. 1029: 973:may be reverted or deleted 953:per evidence presented at 61:purpose of Knowledge (XXG) 989:guide to appealing blocks 658:guide to appealing blocks 498:guide to appealing blocks 478:make useful contributions 1011:10:51, 2 June 2014 (UTC) 985:|Your reason here ~~~~}} 922:Blocked for sockpuppetry 900:19:47, 29 May 2014 (UTC) 854:21:02, 28 May 2014 (UTC) 849: 813:19:33, 28 May 2014 (UTC) 771:18:19, 28 May 2014 (UTC) 766: 756:16:53, 28 May 2014 (UTC) 741:14:40, 28 May 2014 (UTC) 708:13:53, 28 May 2014 (UTC) 703: 694:13:48, 28 May 2014 (UTC) 648:15:27, 2 June 2014 (UTC) 631:12:57, 28 May 2014 (UTC) 626: 528:19:53, 25 May 2014 (UTC) 438:19:03, 25 May 2014 (UTC) 394:18:57, 25 May 2014 (UTC) 366:21:28, 25 May 2014 (UTC) 347:18:41, 25 May 2014 (UTC) 309:21:25, 25 May 2014 (UTC) 290:17:21, 25 May 2014 (UTC) 285: 274:17:10, 25 May 2014 (UTC) 182:21:19, 25 May 2014 (UTC) 156:17:17, 25 May 2014 (UTC) 151: 133:17:08, 25 May 2014 (UTC) 114:14:30, 25 May 2014 (UTC) 109: 99:14:22, 25 May 2014 (UTC) 91:Barney the barney barney 38:discretionary sanctions 938:This account has been 538: 452: 202: 961:, but using them for 590:change block settings 537: 492:Your reason here ~~~~ 451: 201: 65:standards of behavior 217:blocked from editing 73:editing restrictions 979:by adding the text 244:among editors. See 539: 512:dispute resolution 468:and violating the 453: 254:dispute resolution 203: 1016: 1015: 977:appeal this block 482:appeal this block 470:three-revert rule 222:three-revert rule 1020: 986: 933: 926: 671: 665: 609: 607: 596: 578: 576:deleted contribs 536: 495: 472:, as you did at 422: 416:. Thank you. 407: 406: 331: 29: 1028: 1027: 1023: 1022: 1021: 1019: 1018: 1017: 980: 924: 747:I'm sorry, but 677: 669: 663: 662:, then use the 651: 634: 597: 587: 573: 556: 549:blocking policy 534: 531: 516:page protection 485: 445: 418: 404: 401: 374: 327: 319: 258:page protection 196: 87: 86: 30: 22: 12: 11: 5: 1026: 1024: 1014: 1013: 934: 923: 920: 919: 918: 917: 916: 915: 914: 913: 912: 911: 910: 909: 908: 907: 906: 905: 904: 903: 902: 871: 870: 869: 868: 867: 866: 865: 864: 863: 862: 861: 860: 859: 858: 857: 856: 826: 825: 824: 823: 822: 821: 820: 819: 818: 817: 816: 815: 782: 781: 780: 779: 778: 777: 776: 775: 774: 773: 744: 743: 728: 724: 713: 712: 711: 710: 652: 641: 637:Decline reason 618: 614:Request reason 611: 532: 454:You have been 446: 444: 441: 400: 397: 373: 370: 369: 368: 318: 315: 314: 313: 312: 311: 293: 292: 195: 192: 191: 190: 189: 188: 187: 186: 185: 184: 163: 162: 161: 160: 159: 158: 138: 137: 136: 135: 117: 116: 67:, or relevant 46:fringe science 31: 24: 23: 21: 18: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1025: 1012: 1008: 1004: 1000: 996: 995: 990: 984: 978: 974: 970: 966: 965: 960: 956: 952: 951:sock puppetry 948: 944: 943: 941: 935: 932: 928: 927: 921: 901: 897: 893: 889: 888: 887: 886: 885: 884: 883: 882: 881: 880: 879: 878: 877: 876: 875: 874: 873: 872: 855: 851: 847: 842: 841: 840: 839: 838: 837: 836: 835: 834: 833: 832: 831: 830: 829: 828: 827: 814: 810: 806: 802: 798: 794: 793: 792: 791: 790: 789: 788: 787: 786: 785: 784: 783: 772: 768: 764: 759: 758: 757: 754: 750: 746: 745: 742: 738: 734: 729: 725: 722: 721: 719: 718: 717: 716: 715: 714: 709: 705: 701: 697: 696: 695: 691: 687: 683: 679: 678: 676: 675: 668: 661: 659: 650: 649: 646: 640: 638: 633: 632: 628: 624: 617: 615: 610: 605: 601: 595: 591: 586: 582: 577: 572: 568: 567:global blocks 564: 563:active blocks 560: 555: 550: 546: 544: 543:administrator 530: 529: 525: 521: 517: 513: 509: 505: 499: 493: 489: 483: 479: 475: 471: 467: 463: 459: 458: 450: 442: 440: 439: 435: 431: 427: 423: 421: 415: 411: 398: 396: 395: 391: 387: 383: 378: 371: 367: 363: 359: 355: 351: 350: 349: 348: 344: 340: 336: 332: 330: 324: 316: 310: 306: 302: 297: 296: 295: 294: 291: 287: 283: 278: 277: 276: 275: 271: 267: 261: 259: 255: 251: 247: 243: 239: 234: 232: 227: 223: 219: 218: 212: 208: 200: 193: 183: 179: 175: 171: 170: 169: 168: 167: 166: 165: 164: 157: 153: 149: 144: 143: 142: 141: 140: 139: 134: 130: 126: 121: 120: 119: 118: 115: 111: 107: 103: 102: 101: 100: 96: 92: 84: 82: 78: 74: 70: 66: 62: 58: 53: 51: 47: 43: 42:pseudoscience 39: 34: 28: 19: 17: 992: 968: 964:illegitimate 962: 946: 942:indefinitely 937: 936: 749:eight years? 748: 681: 673: 655: 653: 642: 636: 635: 619: 613: 612: 585:creation log 552: 540: 501: 491: 466:edit warring 461: 455: 419: 414:edit warring 402: 379: 375: 328: 320: 262: 235: 230: 214: 204: 194:Edit warring 88: 54: 35: 32: 15: 797:Acupuncture 474:Acupuncture 372:Steiner bio 250:noticeboard 207:Acupuncture 947:indefinite 892:Tgeorgescu 805:Tgeorgescu 645:--jpgordon 581:filter log 57:uninvolved 994:Callanecc 753:Origamite 656:read the 600:checkuser 559:block log 508:consensus 506:and seek 420:Doc James 382:user page 358:Brangifer 329:Doc James 323:WP:MEDHOW 301:Brangifer 266:Brangifer 242:consensus 238:talk page 174:Brangifer 125:Brangifer 1003:contribs 967:reasons 733:HGilbert 571:contribs 490:|reason= 462:48 hours 443:May 2014 430:contribs 386:HGilbert 354:WP:MEDRS 339:contribs 252:or seek 229:warring— 211:edit war 69:policies 991:first. 983:unblock 959:allowed 940:blocked 844:behalf! 667:unblock 594:unblock 488:unblock 457:blocked 226:reverts 969:is not 846:Klocek 799:, see 763:Klocek 700:Klocek 682:master 623:Klocek 554:Klocek 500:first. 282:Klocek 148:Klocek 106:Klocek 81:blocks 63:, our 727:war). 660:first 520:Bbb23 434:email 343:email 79:, or 1007:logs 999:talk 949:for 896:talk 850:talk 809:talk 767:talk 737:talk 704:talk 690:talk 627:talk 524:talk 464:for 426:talk 390:talk 362:talk 335:talk 317:Edit 305:talk 286:talk 270:talk 178:talk 152:talk 129:talk 110:talk 95:talk 77:bans 50:here 44:and 686:Kww 604:log 551:). 518:. 260:. 246:BRD 1009:) 1005:• 1001:• 981:{{ 898:) 852:) 811:) 803:. 769:) 739:) 706:) 692:) 670:}} 664:{{ 639:: 629:) 616:: 598:• 592:• 588:• 583:• 579:• 574:• 569:• 565:• 561:• 526:) 494:}} 486:{{ 432:· 428:· 392:) 364:) 341:· 337:· 307:) 288:) 272:) 213:. 180:) 154:) 131:) 112:) 97:) 89:. 75:, 52:. 997:( 894:( 848:( 807:( 765:( 735:( 702:( 688:( 625:( 608:) 606:) 602:( 557:( 522:( 424:( 388:( 360:( 333:( 303:( 284:( 268:( 176:( 150:( 127:( 108:( 93:(

Index


discretionary sanctions
pseudoscience
fringe science
here
uninvolved
purpose of Knowledge (XXG)
standards of behavior
policies
editing restrictions
bans
blocks
Barney the barney barney
talk
14:22, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
Klocek
talk
14:30, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
Brangifer
talk
17:08, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
Klocek
talk
17:17, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
Brangifer
talk
21:19, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
Stop icon
Acupuncture
edit war

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑