User talk:Kwh/Archive 2008-01-27

2456:...Did I truly want to tremble at the awesome autocratic Objectivist might of Jimbo Wales, Danny Wool, and the WP:OFFICE dictat — or of the various hidden cadres, cabals, and cliques of internal cachet and power that I might cross unawares? Were any of these people deserving of my respect? Or were they just fucking twerps without a life on a massive power trip? In short — I realized that Knowledge, the way it was, simply wasn’t an organization that deserved my time or efforts. They don’t really deserve anyone’s time or efforts, and if you’ve left them, well, then, God bless you, my friend. 1784:

the press reporting it or paraphrasing "first picture". "First Image" is a more sweeping suggestion than "first photo" or even "first picture" (I think its a bit illogical that TBL would choose the first image to be a scanned colour photo (rather something simple like an already computerized CERN logo). Obviously, please free to modify my statement to better reflect the technical history in the context of what TBL is stating on his page (which I was taking literally, without any context knowledge of my own)

35:, I've started a gallery of exemplars. I've added your excellent Florida Political Map as an example. These maps could also serve as interim standards until the project establishes firm standards. This same approach could help establish other standards, such as for insets, fonts, etc. I hope that you and other more experienced mapmakers will help develop this gallery approach. Apprentice mapmakers find ourselves currently "at sea". :-: --> 423:"I will fax you a letter stating that I am purchasing this equipment for the IDF, and at the same time get a signed letter from the commander of Paratroop brigade 890 to' who this may concern' Mr Shmuel Ben Zvi Is purchasing this thermal device for us.... And we can go both to RAYTHEON and FLIR (near boston) who sells the better MILCAMEXP. Then we just need "end user" clearence from the State Department." 2450:

The quoted sections you removed were presented neutrally, and directly applicable to the nominator's contention that the essay contained incivility directed at Wikipedians; removing it was inappropriate, as was your explantory response that followed. Perhaps some of the commenters during the MfD didn't make it through the entire blog posting-- which was why I pointed out to the rhetoric from there,

2074:

but also have downloaded many from web. Like i mentioned before all the ones i put selfmade tag on were my own, however there is a chance that one or two of them were not mine and got replaced by webuploaded images. The picture of Homa which you found another copy of in the web is probably not mine then, i have about 20 pictures of Homa in my HD. But the rest are mine with 90% certainty. --

1631: 2482: 2533:

is for. People can look at the link and judge for themselves. Also, since Knowledge's goal is to be a 💕, generally when there is a doubt of whether the image is Free or an insufficient fair use rationale, images are deleted. There's not a compelling reason to keep the image in question because there

2449:

guideline; that you misread my comments; and that you have selectively applied your own concept of "personal attack", ignoring other commenters reference to WCityMike as "The guy clearly has some personal issues", and (the final) calling his essay "a long, meandering whine... tepid, tedious stuff..."

2285:

Lol, don' worry? took only one minute? evasive? Accusing me of lying? I have adviced you to behave civil before, i now do it again. Its very simple, behave civil or be blocked, which do you prefer. Like i said to KwH some pictures i uploaded could have been from the web. I guess i could have searched

2243:

Ah, really? So what if the file was created earlier than i uploaded mine, i have used my pics in many forums. However like i said to KwH some of the pics i uploaded except the ones below could be from the web, so SG i appreaciate you go taking so much of your own time searching the web to find a copy

2073:

was my previous account. I have stopped using it and made this account. Regarding your suggestion of deletion of all my uploaded pictures. Perhaps one or two images was not properly sourced, then you decided that the rest of them were too? I have about 2000 pictures in my HD. I take alot of pictures,

1530:

says that "Roger Stillwell, the desk officer for the Mariana Islands at the U.S. Department of the Interior who dealt closely with disgraced lobbyist Jack Abramoff, is expected to plead guilty to a misdemeanor count of false certification, his attorney confirmed Wednesday." I think the time has come

1442:

Not really sure what you want me to contribute. She has a moral/belief system that is incompatible with the rules of wikipedia. In my phone conversation she made it clear that she believed it's ok to make a personal attack in response to a personal attack against her. When she was blocked for doing

1190:

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways, from comparing articles that need work to other articles you've edited, to choosing articles randomly (ensuring that all articles with cleanup tags get a chance to be cleaned up). It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as

551:

I don't think that WP:AGF is ever thrown out the window, but I know what you mean. I've struggled with this too. As long as this individual responds respectfully and rationally, then we should do the same. If they become disrespectful, we should either ignore or remove the disrespect, and refocus the

234:

I disagree with the conclusion. Yes, he may have compartmentalized himself, and in some areas of his life he was religious, but his talk about God, etc., with regard to his scandals seems (obvious to me) to be post-hoc justification and/or spin to put his actions in a more favorable light. In fact,

153:

That's an extremely controversial topic in this article, with strong feelings from people on both sides. However, please provide a cite for this: "Abramoff stated that he felt that some of his work in the promotion of Israel and the Jewish religion justified many of his actions." I have done a lot of

1305:

I'm sorry, just working from WP:Copyright Problems, I didn't know the wider context regarding the image's deletion listing. Had I known I would have been reluctant to go ahead with deleting the image. I was basing my decision on the simple principle of fair use requiring no free alternatives, but as

939:

Thanks for stepping in on the Donald Rumsfeld page, though I'm not sure how much it will help. It seems that this guy just has an axe to grind about Rummy and doesn't understand the idea of a reference article. Him not having a registered User ID doesn't make working with him easy, either. Anyway,

533:

Fantastic work, finding the initial article. The amazing thing, that I don't think the public is aware of, is that Abramoff was actually under a lot of scrutiny for a long time there were a lot of people who had a good idea of what he was up to. But they didn't drop the hammer, until the situation

461:

Hey with your permission I was going to mention that the sniper school was in Israel, I won't make a big deal about it or anything, just a word or two. Don't you think it's a pretty important piece of information for a reader to know, it is unreasonable for a national to censor anything about their

1783:

Thanks for the note. I'm not a techie guy, so I defer to your clearly much better knowledge about the technology. I get the sense from reading the Cernette picture website that the claim being made is simply about photographs, and that the "first image on the web" line was more something written by

224:

I concur, I've definitely got to make sure I can get a couple more quotes to solidify the argument, before I enter the fray, sounds like some people are going to get banned over this. I also agree that there are a million sides to Abramoff which is one of the reasons he's such a interesting subject

207:

Good research on sources - just watch out. I got personally attacked by others just for trying to be a referee in the argument, and I'm not interested in seeing it explode again. I'm still trying to fully understand Jack's psyche and motivations for my own benefit, I'd be interested in knowing more

884:

cover this very topic... However, is there case law that applies to Crown Copyright? Is there are treaty between England and the U.S. that covers intellectual property rights? I would imagine there is. If there is, and it covers Crown Copyright, then we could say that "This images is licensed (bad

593:

My intent was not to criticize Israel but to document and tell an important part of the Abramoff story--where some of his ill-gotten funds went and why they went there. That is legitimate information for the article even if some people don't like it. By the way, I never said or insinuated that you

449:

We made some changes in the article. It is of no concern to an Encyclopedia what a "reporter" wrote. We need governmental agencies to determine the facts for us. Or to concur with a reporters investigation. Thats not the case here. This is conjecture. So we should just stick to the facts. What the

416:

This is a primary source, direct from Abramoff's emails, made public in the Senate Indian Affairs investigation. I would imagine that the FBI has spoken to this individual, though it's not public record. There are numerous emails from 2001 and 2002. Abramoff made contact with a Russian Oil and Gas

162:

Roger that, I'll see if I can get an exact quote it is mentioned by one of the two lead reporters who broke the Abramoff story, you can see him explaining this motive of Abramoff, the reporter claims comes from his own interviews with Abramoff, which the reporter states in the CSPAN video for this

1980:

I am sorry if i acted against policy, but you should correct many other pictures from those websites i mentioned. I uploaded the images after seeing the very same summaries on other images frmo those sites. If a website says the you can use the images as longas you mention our name in the summayr

695:

KWH, I like your point about Knowledge being weak on web history. There are a lot of sites (like Mirsky's) that have virtually sunk into a black hole now. I guess the Knowledge way of dealing with this is to start a Wikiproject? If there was something to urge the history-gathering process on a

408:

We find this "older" version to be more accurate and that you added the strange "Octagon" stuff as a way to please some of the AntiJewish, ANTI - "Israel-firsters" (We're really cracking up at that one as we thought that we had heard it all)..... Anyway what balance is it striking, its just plain

2400:

Just keep cool and pretend we're all discussing this over tea. If you start to get angry, step away from the keyboard and do whatever it takes to get it off your mind, and then return to it with a fresh mind. I've done it myself where I have written several paragraphs, thought about it, and then

2163:

Also, I understand and believe that you have your images "mixed up" with others on your hard drive, but you have to understand that when you upload an image as GFDL-self, you are basically donating something to Knowledge and the millions who use it or will use it, so if you're not 100% sure it's

2422:

is the one I've begun on. Feel free to contribute if you'd like. It's nowhere near ready for actual review, but I think it has an extremely fair base as I've started to set it up, that would prevent abuse outright, and make it fair for those nominated, with a pretty massive timeframe/window for

2396:

Thanks... While I don't know the details of the ban either, and won't presume to judge one way or the other, I would say that you might have been a little intemperate with Striver recently. Although I think it's true that you were somewhat provoked, it weakens your case on the article if anyone

2199:

First of all SG, you cant read persian so i wonder how you could come to the conclusion that mine is the copvio of theirs and that they have not downloaded from wikipedia. Regarding variations of my photos lol, what you think is irrelevant. So why don't you keep your suspicions and thoughts for

586:

Your comment betrays the fact that your own intention in editing is to criticize Israel, not inform the reader about Jack Abramoff. And I find it laughably ironic that, in trying to keep the article focused on the subject matter at hand, I'm accused of anti-semitism and pro-semitism appeasement

142:

I don't know if removing both Jewish activist references was fair, certainly you could argue doing it in the first sentence might be overstating it, but it is a relevant characteristic of Abramoff due, because it denotes one of Jack Abramoff Political motives, as explained by Abramoff himself.

302:

But we know why they reported it, don't we? Because they're Jew haters, of course. Needless to say, I don't appreciate your revert because of this manufactured "controversy." You slashed-and-burned the section to appease the Israel-firsters and you couldn't even bother to get the title of the

2366:

My suggestion is to state your case at the IFD page. Even though I may have no reason to doubt your claim, it is the Knowledge community which will have to decide. You might provide as much information as possible to buttress your claim - the date on which you took the picture, for instance.

1496:

If you're not interested in yet a whole other huge scandal (in terms of "players", etc., it rivals Abramoff in scope, imho), there is still one Abramoff story that has not yet been written about much here -- and that is the Marianas Islands. If you're interested in that, I'd like to help/be

1961:

Hello, those two images were not licensed, the websites which i added in the summary has granted all images from their website to be used as long as their webadress is mentioned in the summary, same goes for iranchamber.com. So my guess was GDFL, however i do not know why you say they are

655:. I find that kind of weird. First off, it's on the Talk page, not the main article. Secondly, there are plenty of sources on the main article. I would have removed it, but I am a fairly new wikipedian, and don't know the rules/etiquette surrounding that category. Please advise? 445:

This is interesting and I downloaded the Senates Indian affairs material and read some of it myself, but it is non conclusive. Without the FBI's stamp of approvel we do not know if any of this ever came to fruition. All we know if that Jack spoke of it with a friend.

566:

Word, I'm not a hater I'm a.., yeah, I usually skip out on flame wars. I don't think there will be many more problems in the future since there are so many admins watching the page anyway. Perhaps the dude will chill out, and find some evidence to support his view

1706: 1325: 476:

Hey there -- I was away on vacation (and unconnected to the 'net) for 1-1/2 weeks. I need to get caught up. Did you do a full replace of the Abramoff article with your Refacted version? I want to make additions/edits/etc., in the correct place. Thanks!

323:

I totally agree that pro-Israel groups are completely out of control, they essentially want to censor history from allowing any information that might cast a negative light on Israel from getting out. This is an insult to objectivity and it should not be

664:

As to your most recent edit of the pic -- WADR (and I mean that becuase I've enjoyed working with you) -- I'm not sure what the point of it was. In particular, "Abramoff cut an imposing figure in a dark black trenchcoat and matching hat." seems POV. --

1425:. I really can't tell you how very much I appreciate that sort of a statement. I've put a lot of work into Knowledge and not gotten a lot of that sort of comments, and I gotta tell you, it's like a drink of water to a Sahara-crossin' man. — 873:, given that the U.S. is not part of the Commonwealth. After all, the content is currently being stored in Florida, and yet the license being used is a law that does not immediately apply in the U.S.. I don't believe we even deal with this in 290:

Notice how criticizing any aspect of Israel becomes antisemtic and "Jew-hatred"? Notice, too, how you fan this bias by doing the grunt work for those who will, apparently, accept no discussion of Israel in the article even though

2286:

the web myself before uploading them. But whether it took you one minute or 50, i appreciate you taking your time to find the ones that are not mine, the task would have been made by KwH sooner or later, you did him a favor :). --

193:

Frankly, I didn't need to have a kosher delicatessen. That was money I could have bought a yacht with. I don't live an extravagant lifestyle. I felt that the resources coming into my hands were the consequence of God putting them

814:

Hey thanks with that image. I think it preety clear by now that the user does not understand fair use, and is more intrested in just deleting the files. If you would not mind, i might need your help with several other images.

2722: 1812:

but this map wasnt exactly what i want,please will you make a map of the Arab world that include "Israel",Western Sahara, Eritria and the coast of iran¹ and exclude comors i want all Arab countries to be given green colors.

1476: 143:

Abramoff stated that he felt that some of his work in the promotion of Israel and the Jewish religion justified many of his actions. Isn't this important to mention if it helps tell Abramoff's story in a balanced manner.--

1480: 2133:) I have left alone, for the time being. Many of the other photos have the tell-tale appearance of being scanned from a book (rather than a digital photo or being scanned from a photo print). Those which I tagged with 393:

article, great find BTW. I was wondering should some of those be uploaded to the wikimedia, in case Senate Committee decides to take them down, or is it not wikimedia not a place for PDF files. Thanks for you time,

409:

weird. And not even proven. The FBI didn't speak with this "friend" maybe abramoff made it up or contrived it somehow. This isn't WONKETTE its an Encyclopedia. Its really not relevant and marginal at the very least.

417:

company in October 2001, who gave him a quote on a Russian military thermal imager. He forwarded the information to 'octagon1' and asked for an opinion on what sort of 'objective' should be purchased on the imager.

1474:

if he would join me in attempting to write an article on the potential scandal between Congressman Lewis, the lobby firm started by Lowery, etc. We started with just a data collection dump into a temp area, at

928: 2164:

yours, then you are donating something which belongs to someone else, as surely as if you had walked into their house and started renting their belongings out. I think you would agree that is not right, yes?

1798:

Hello, you have sent me a message that you had to remove the image "3arabworld.jpg", i need an image of the Arab world and i want it to be used in the template please, can you some how help me with that plz?

2495:

and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile to others by adding

2093:

I do not doubt what you say. Please note that I tried to consider each instance with an unprejudiced mind; for those which could not possibly be GFDL-self or GFDL-no-disclaimers, I removed the tag and used

2397:

looking in from the outside thinks that you are the one losing your cool. I think that you had all the right arguments about content and policy, but they succeeded in making you look like the "angry one".

2183:

website. I won't tag it, for fear that Spahbod will simply remove my notice, so I'll let you do it. Honestly, I don't see why there is such huge variation in the quality of photos if he indeed took them.

597:

As for your conclusion, "Guess I'm doing something right." This is fallacious reasoning on your part. The name of the fallacy you have fallen victim to is the golden mean fallacy or fallacy of moderation.

1547:

Thanks for the heads up, I have been somewhat busy with things off-wiki but will try to get up to speed on these matters. I've also been interested in creating maps (know any articles that need a map?)

1253: 487:

Thanks for your reply on my page, I replied there instead of here, since there is where you left the comment. (Should I have replied here?). In any event, I look forward to your response --

1108: 1604:

Hmmm, I was just going to drop you a note complimenting your excellent work on that page, but Isotope beat me to it. I'm glad that you were willing to take the time and explain that

594:

are engaging in "pro-semitism." I have no idea what you motives are but judging by your talk entries my guess is that philo-Semitism is not one of them or at least not the main one.

1675:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any 380:

I wrote, "Kwh, thanks for the link but there are six large PDF files there and I don't have a fast Internet connection. Would you please narrow it down to the particular file(s)?"--

963:

I made a mistake and removed the Rumsfeld issue from arbitration. Now I'm thinking of putting it back. But can they really help with this? Can this guy be reasoned with at all?

235:

a more recent quote from him was this: "God sent me 1,000 hints that he didn't want me to keep doing what I was doing. But I didn't listen, so he set off a nuclear bomb." (See

2667: 1671:

If you have uploaded other fair use media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

2462:

Which certainly sounds pretty much like an expansive personal attack to me, and one which wouldn't have been in the least acceptable had it appeared on a user's own page. --

2273:

Really, you didn't have to be so evasive; it would have taken less than a minute of your time to say "I did not take this photograph, it is from and doesn't belong to me."

869:

You realise, of course, that what you are asking me for is how a U.S. court will apply the laws of different countries in the U.S.? The question is: does the U.S. recognise

1940:? I'd really like to hear from some of the map "regulars" about this. And if you have any ideas for other ways I might solicit responses, please let me know. Thanks. -- 1860:

The picture appears to be created and copyrighted by the Iranian Student News Agency and Hamed Noori. Although a US court would theoretically not uphold a copyright suit,

2733:

during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.

2670:. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. 742:

Articles that have been previously deleted by consensus may be eligible for speedy deletion under CSD:G4. Since this is disputed, I have no problem leaving it to AFD.

1768:

Hmm... im starting to see your point. Hm.... "reasonably familiar". Its tricky. Im sure its not "reasonably familiar ", but rather, "reasonably familiar ", right? --

1809: 450:

FBI suspects is OK, what the Senate reported is OK. But not Newsweek or Time. OH, Its ok if your writing for a Newspaper or magazine.Just not for an Encyclopedia.

2516:

to be infringing upon copyrights. However, you have no proof of it and cannot verify it by showing that it belongs to the archives of another news organization.

2263: 2227:. Are you suggesting the IRNA has a time machine? And don't jump to conclusions about my knowledge of Persian based on the lack of a Babel box on my userpage. 1404:

Thank you for the barnstar. I've been on Knowledge since August 2004, and yours is the first barnstar I've ever received. I'm actually quite grateful. =-) —

1672: 80: 1664:, meaning that is not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. 2266:. If you really did use it on other forums, at least one hit would have come up on there. The only other use of the image is a stretched out version on 2017:

I had uploaded two more images besides those you put no license tag on. I have now put no license tag on them as well, and again sorry for my errors. --

856:

Sounds complex. My take is that we need to define Crown Copyright better, however it's probably best to treat it as a non-free license and use fair use

1886:. It's respectful to the rights of the author, and it's what would be expected if Iran had a democratic revolution tomorrow and joined the free world. 2529:

Determining whether the source and license information for an image is correct and credible enough for Knowledge to use the image is pretty much what

717: 196:", this establishes his Jewish motivation, he was a deeply religious man. I'm going to find a couple more quotes to lay this contraversy to rest. 552:

discussion on the actual issue at hand (the content of the article). Dwelling on past actions only keeps us from moving onward and past this issue.

1006: 2730: 2714: 2708: 269: 1680: 730:

is not applicable. It's only got one more day before that AfD is closed, so unless you're anxious, maybe you can let consensus run its course.

680: 2386:

Looks like I got banned as ED_MD. I have little to understand the reason why. Maybe I can keep clean and avoid problems with a new profile.

1594:

Your latest post to the What Really Happened AfD said what I've been trying to allude to over several posts much more succintly. Good show.--

99: 59: 751:

Thank you. I would point out that the article was not substantially the same per CSD:G4, since sources were added which show notability per

683:

I don't think all that was necessary. But I think even the main DFC article cinches it because it says "SpinnWebe...uses Keane's cartoons".

1240: 1016: 282: 2615:

I have edited the information about this image to clarify things. I hope this helps. Let me know if you think I should add anything else.

239:). No -- his motivation in the lobbying scandals were to make money, be a power player, see the success of the GOP agenda, and so forth. 2632: 2625: 2648: 2567: 2401:

closed the browser window without saving the edit. Then, I come back later and write one sentence which is far more effective. Be well,

1231: 1076: 74: 1139: 1126: 1157: 125: 1390: 1066: 874: 64: 2644: 1937: 32: 164: 2631:

Hello, I've decided to mediate the Shock and awe case. Sorry it took so long. Anyways, there's some questions you can answer

2114:. I used this method, which allows one week for someone to correct the information, as opposed to more aggressive means like 502:

Thanks for cleaning up the vandal dropping on my talk page. I seem to be doing good at upsetting people this morning. :) --

951: 2693:(which is my own work). So, if you could sacrifice a few minutes, it might help considerably. Thank you in advance. Best, 1876: 1452: 1225: 686:

I didn't even remember I was in the Washington Post for the Nipple Server. Huh. Did you LexisNexis this, or something? --

1836: 1036: 2311:

KwH, i have scanned this pictures from real pictures that i took, and not digital ones, so i know these are mine 100%:

2551:

You do have valid points. However, I will leave it for other to decide and will move on to other tasks. Thank you.--

1261: 1236: 519:

Yup I guess your right, the only way to really track him down would be to get query the ip, but no cares that much.--

128:

finally got himself a block. Maybe you will have an easier time working on the Abramoff articles now. Good luck! --

2040:

I just wanted to thank you for your input on the discussion, KWH. You really made a difference. Once again, thanks.

1487:

had created an entry for him, so I just alerted him to the project. This seems similar to the project you did with

298: 2663: 2534:

is a doubt, and it is not necessary to include the image describe or prove the fact that the meeting took place. (

1652: 77:(not sure of the name, but where the listing of money to & fro goes, since that's the current media obsession) 2571: 2519:

If you want to contest it, please contact them and explain why you believe the Website needs to be reprimanded.--

1527: 1162: 878: 2609: 1559:. FYI: this evening I am going on vacation for a week and will have no access on-line until next Wednesday. -- 1817: 1758:

saved in JPG as the original format: nothing is lost and nothing would be gained by having them made non-jpg.--

1206: 1051: 278: 197: 2640: 906:

easy to answer. You must take into account extra-terratoriality, treaties and conflicts of law. And IANAL. -

377:

described as 'Exhibits released to the public as part of the Oversight Hearing on Lobbying Practices'." ...

1754:

Bro, i dont get why you removed those logos. If your problem is that they are JPG, its not valid since they

2721:. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at 2738: 2593: 2335: 2331: 2323: 2319: 1170: 808: 634: 613: 178:, he has written and interviewed Abramoff probably more than anyone else. Now I got to find that needle-- 348:

and without being disruptive. (which the anonymous IP contributors have been a little better at lately).

274: 2636: 1378:

Thank you so much for that, I really appreciate your effort, don't know how you did it so fast. Cheers!

1001: 1510:

of the story, that is enveloping a huge part of the Ohio Republican leadership. (I have some ideas at

600: 300: 2339: 2327: 2176: 2126: 952:

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Mediation_Cabal/Cases/2006-03-17_Donald_Rumsfeld#Request_Information

200: 2600: 2315: 1946: 1918: 1689: 1443:

that she felt the admin who blocked her was in the wrong. She will never be a happy contributor. ---

1385: 1195: 907: 894: 885:

word, I know) under crown copyright, which is recognised under U.S. law." Have you considered asking

861: 848: 838: 799: 503: 129: 2156:

I would say if you want to assert that specific images were taken by you, please respond to them at

2130: 2122: 1427: 1406: 2583: 2428: 1532: 1471: 1348: 1116: 820: 147: 1981:

what license would that be? and what would i have to include in the article besides the adress? --

1737:

I'd appreciate your opinion on matters in the Discussion of article "Dissident Voice". Thank you.

428:

I could tell you where to find the emails, but maybe you should do a little of your own research.

167:, I'm going to see if I can get an article with quotes mentioning what that reporter talked about. 2492: 2439: 1869: 1823: 1800: 1556: 724: 652: 370: 295:

and probably other legitimate media sources thought this was one noteworthy aspect of the story.

87: 1491:, so, I wanted to alert you to this project, too. We were thinking of "going public" on Friday. 2523: 264:

Thank you for reverting the antisemtic/anti-Israel material. -Brad (with the Jew-hatred watch)

165:

C-SPAN Special on Jack Abramoff & the Tribal Lobbying Investigation - Part 2 (01/04/2006)

2734: 2147: 1484: 1448: 1358: 996: 638: 603: 381: 308: 2687: 2387: 1906: 1861: 1852: 1609: 1086: 1056: 420:

When they found out the Russian company would take 6 months to deliver, 'octagon1' replied:

175: 49:

Whew. A lot of great stuff there. I've done a first pass at breaking out Abramoff articles:

2535: 2672: 2599:

Isn't this being used legitimately? It's a logo and an important part of their website. -

2505: 2501: 2338:(talk | delete) Uploaded by Darkred (notify). ditto KWH 09:34, 28 July 2006 (UTC) * 2334:(talk | delete) Uploaded by Darkred (notify). ditto KWH 09:34, 28 July 2006 (UTC) * 2330:(talk | delete) Uploaded by Darkred (notify). ditto KWH 09:34, 28 July 2006 (UTC) * 2326:(talk | delete) Uploaded by Darkred (notify). ditto KWH 09:34, 28 July 2006 (UTC) * 2322:(talk | delete) Uploaded by Darkred (notify). ditto KWH 09:34, 28 July 2006 (UTC) * 2318:(talk | delete) Uploaded by Darkred (notify). ditto KWH 09:34, 28 July 2006 (UTC) * 1941: 1883: 1721: 1685: 1577: 1379: 1244: 1210: 1071: 1011: 980: 870: 390: 345: 171: 69: 1865: 2742: 2701: 2676: 2652: 2619: 2603: 2587: 2555: 2544: 2470: 2432: 2407: 2390: 2373: 2358: 2299: 2280: 2257: 2234: 2213: 2191: 2170: 2087: 2060: 2030: 2012: 1994: 1975: 1951: 1925: 1908: 1892: 1854: 1826: 1803: 1788: 1772: 1762: 1741: 1724: 1691: 1630: 1612: 1598: 1584: 1563: 1539: 1522: 1456: 1432: 1411: 1394: 1365: 1310: 1295: 1286: 1272: 1247: 1213: 967: 958: 944: 910: 897: 864: 851: 841: 823: 802: 781: 770: 761: 746: 736: 700: 690: 669: 659: 641: 622: 606: 571: 558: 538: 523: 506: 491: 481: 466: 434: 398: 384: 354: 334: 311: 243: 229: 182: 132: 107: 90: 39: 2579: 2552: 2520: 2497: 2488: 2424: 1922: 1665: 1595: 1269: 1199: 1152: 1134: 1103: 1026: 890: 816: 2342:(talk | delete) Uploaded by Darkred (notify). ditto KWH 09:34, 28 July 2006 (UTC) 2726: 2718: 2540: 2530: 2465: 2446: 2403: 2369: 2219:

Ah, really? According to the file information on the IRNA website, it was created on

2166: 2157: 2115: 1888: 1488: 1422: 1265: 1061: 777: 757: 752: 732: 618: 554: 430: 350: 344:

I think they (and others) have every right to state their case as long as they do so

218: 156: 53: 17: 2180: 236: 216:, but he still (as you say) maintains some belief in a moral basis for his actions. 2694: 2575: 2347: 2288: 2277: 2246: 2231: 2202: 2188: 2137: 2108: 2098: 2076: 2070: 2049: 2044: 2019: 2001: 1983: 1964: 1769: 1759: 1705: 1657: 1656:. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image can be used under a 1444: 1341: 1324: 1292: 1283: 1121: 1041: 964: 955: 941: 886: 697: 213: 36: 1031: 296: 2686:

Hi Kwh! I believe your input would be very valuable and much appreciated in this

1900: 1846: 1785: 1661: 1581: 1560: 1536: 1519: 1511: 1307: 1081: 1046: 767: 743: 666: 656: 568: 535: 520: 488: 478: 463: 395: 331: 240: 226: 209: 179: 144: 104: 1191:

needing work. Your contributions make Knowledge better -- thanks for helping.

2616: 2538:

does have a citable article on the meeting, as well as many others.) Regards,

2352: 2293: 2251: 2207: 2081: 2054: 2024: 2006: 1988: 1969: 1738: 1144: 1021: 860:

to cover ourselves. This means fair use rationales, use the sparingly, etc. -

687: 2244:

of the picture so we know that it may have been someone else's. Good work, --

1818:

http://www.al-ahwaz.com/AhwazHistory/documents/images_doc/ahwaz_arab_map.jpg

713: 706: 679:

Wow, thanks for the research, KWH...though really, now that he's gotten his

2419: 716:? There is currently a huge discussion of the notability of the article at 651:

I noticed there is a "Category: Articles lacking sources" at the bottom of

589: 2047:

13:46, 26 July 2006 (UTC) SG, i wouldn't joy too soon if i were you :). --

2723:

Knowledge:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Early Web History

1503: 1194:

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on

1175: 1098: 1864:

has indicated that we should respect the foreign copyright nonetheless (

1477:

User_talk:John_Broughton/Lewis-Lowery-Shockey-White_lobbying_controversy

983:

predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

847:

Does Crown Copyright apply in the U.S.? I know nothing of this issue. -

2274: 2228: 2185: 2041: 1481:

User talk:John Broughton/Jerry Lewis - Lowery lobbying firm controversy

1180: 2691: 120:

Good to see that you didn't take too long of break. If you check his

1306:

you say, there are wider considerations (commentary on the hat etc.)

1205:

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on

102:. You're on a roll, I'm not going to interrupt right now <g: --> 2267: 931:

for the History of the World Wide Web article. Thanks! — Wackymacs

598: 2481: 929:

Knowledge:Collaborations_of_the_Week/History_of_the_World_Wide_Web

462:

country. I think Brad might be chilled out now, to let it go. --

2143:

I have a good reason to believe are not your photos. I also used

2508:}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Happy editing! 1268:

instead, and copied the votes; it is, after all, a redirect. --

766:

Unfortunately as I'm not an admin, I could not determine that.

2729:

with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of

2121:

Images which could possibly potentially be your picture (like

1531:

for a Marianas Islands article. I've left a similar note to

441:

Sounds like he and his friend were doing all of this legally.

208:

as his behavior toward the tribes and some others was almost

31:

Kwh, in an attempt to advance the discussion of standards at

2480: 1868:). I would say that it should be used according to standard 2445:

Again, I believe that you have misinterpreted the disputed

1254:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma

374: 189:

I have spent years giving away virtually everything I made,

1622:

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Time Cover Abramoff.jpg)

1209:. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- 1109:

National Democratic Institute for International Affairs

121: 86:

But there's so much more info in the Refactor entry...

2153:

only in cases where I am certain it is not your photo.

2662:

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered,

2578:, so a proper consensus can be achieved. Thanks. — 1720:

For your funny comment on the Eon8 deletion review.

1502:Yet another huge scandal is the Ohio Workers fund. 1479:, and from that have started to make an article at 712:Why did you add a speedy deletion template back to 1679:will be deleted after seven days, as described on 2658:Image:Time_Cover_Abramoff.jpg listed for deletion 2262:Don't worry, it only took about a minute to do a 237:http://www.time.com/time/verbatim/20060130/5.html 1810:Image:Map of League of Arab States countries.png 1483:. As I was writing this morning, I noticed that 976:Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot 837:is an appropriate use of fair use. Good work! - 587:simultaneously. Guess I'm doing something right. 389:I was going through some of those emails for my 1936:Hi - Have you noticed the question I posted at 154:research on Abramoff and I have not read that. 2200:yourself and let us handle this. Thank you, -- 1844:What is the copyright status of this picture? 2717:, a page you created, has been nominated for 2382:nice work with the shock and awe sandbox page 8: 1938:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Maps#Locator dots 81:list of Jack Abramoff-related organizations 950:I took your advice and went to the Cabal; 212:in his lack of empathy, and in some cases 1555:I'm going to start with a "data dump" at 718:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/SpinnWebe 1668:if you think that that will be useful. 877::-) Interestingly, however, our article 2731:Knowledge:WikiProject Early Web History 2715:Knowledge:WikiProject Early Web History 2709:Knowledge:WikiProject Early Web History 2668:Knowledge:Images and media for deletion 927:Hey, can you please consider voting at 2512:You could say that it is possible for 2223:. The image on Knowledge was uploaded 1808:Thank you for the map you have made.. 1703: 1322: 1282:See my reply to you, on my talk page. 954:We'll see where it goes from there... 373:you wrote, "They are the documents at 2181:from the Islamic Republic News Agency 1999:I see, OK thank you for your help. -- 100:Jack Abramoff Indian lobbying scandal 60:Jack Abramoff Indian lobbying scandal 7: 1235:. Please come and help it become a 1017:Association of Chief Police Officers 798:I have responded on my talk page. - 2568:Talk:PC(USA) Divestment from Israel 1932:Question about locator dots on maps 1837:Image:Ahmadinejad-and-Nasrallah.jpg 1077:Americans for a Republican Majority 1007:Frederick Frelinghuysen (1753–1804) 935:Controversy on Rumsfeld Controversy 675:Whoo hey Wiki drama (SpinnWebe AfD) 75:monetary influence of Jack Abramoff 2491:has smiled at you! Smiles promote 1884:Help:Image page#Fair use rationale 1660:. However, the image is currently 1572:Abramoff "Scandal" vs "Controvery" 1140:Arctic Refuge drilling controversy 1127:Federal Foreign Minister (Germany) 902:Actually, the question you ask is 201:Jack Abramoff and Tainted Tzedekah 24: 2690:concerning the use of this image 2476:Nasrallah Kissing Khamenei's Hand 1158:Ultimate Mortal Kombat 3 Wave Net 985: 1704: 1629: 1323: 1067:Republican Governors Association 875:enforcement of foreign judgments 65:Jack Abramoff Guam investigation 45:Great work on the Abramoff stuff 2566:Regarding your move request at 2221:Sat, Dec 10, 2005 at 1:30:34 AM 2175:Just letting you know that the 1625: 1421:Thank you for your comments on 696:bit, I'd sure be glad to help. 33:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Maps 317:Thank you DER - STRUM - ROSE. 108:13:03, 14 September 2006 (UTC) 103:. Keep up the great work. -- 1: 2743:17:34, 20 February 2008 (UTC) 2664:Image:Time_Cover_Abramoff.jpg 2620:09:34, 4 September 2006 (UTC) 2604:12:35, 3 September 2006 (UTC) 1653:Image:Time Cover Abramoff.jpg 1606:an encyclopedia has standards 1226:History of the World Wide Web 803:03:03, 28 February 2006 (UTC) 762:02:58, 28 February 2006 (UTC) 747:00:40, 28 February 2006 (UTC) 737:00:35, 28 February 2006 (UTC) 701:21:48, 24 February 2006 (UTC) 691:04:28, 24 February 2006 (UTC) 660:13:59, 22 February 2006 (UTC) 642:11:55, 14 February 2006 (UTC) 623:18:06, 13 February 2006 (UTC) 607:07:00, 13 February 2006 (UTC) 293:Newsweek, The Hill, Bloomberg 2702:17:00, 18 October 2007 (UTC) 1681:criteria for speedy deletion 1466:A few independant thoughts: 1037:Traditional Values Coalition 572:20:20, 6 February 2006 (UTC) 559:20:12, 6 February 2006 (UTC) 539:04:19, 3 February 2006 (UTC) 524:21:53, 2 February 2006 (UTC) 507:13:21, 2 February 2006 (UTC) 492:16:21, 1 February 2006 (UTC) 482:13:27, 1 February 2006 (UTC) 467:21:48, 31 January 2006 (UTC) 435:04:18, 30 January 2006 (UTC) 399:02:57, 2 February 2006 (UTC) 385:08:43, 29 January 2006 (UTC) 355:05:49, 30 January 2006 (UTC) 335:17:41, 29 January 2006 (UTC) 312:08:58, 29 January 2006 (UTC) 244:13:25, 1 February 2006 (UTC) 230:17:28, 27 January 2006 (UTC) 183:15:27, 27 January 2006 (UTC) 148:04:50, 27 January 2006 (UTC) 133:18:48, 25 January 2006 (UTC) 91:07:22, 24 January 2006 (UTC) 2653:17:26, 1 October 2006 (UTC) 2610:Image:Nobel prize medal.jpg 2588:04:27, 30 August 2006 (UTC) 2572:steps for requesting a move 2556:01:23, 24 August 2006 (UTC) 2545:00:27, 24 August 2006 (UTC) 2524:10:07, 23 August 2006 (UTC) 2471:18:27, 21 August 2006 (UTC) 2433:19:53, 10 August 2006 (UTC) 1262:Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma 1207:the SuggestBot request page 40:17:45, 2 January 2007 (UTC) 2758: 2418:If you're at all curious, 2408:09:13, 6 August 2006 (UTC) 2391:08:43, 6 August 2006 (UTC) 1714:The Barnstar of Good Humor 1339:Baliff, smack his peepee! 1333:The Barnstar of Good Humor 1311:21:34, 19 April 2006 (UTC) 1273:08:33, 29 March 2006 (UTC) 1248:19:44, 27 March 2006 (UTC) 1214:13:36, 21 March 2006 (UTC) 1202:, SuggestBot's caretaker. 988: 968:15:22, 28 March 2006 (UTC) 959:15:31, 17 March 2006 (UTC) 945:15:04, 14 March 2006 (UTC) 670:15:26, 29 March 2006 (UTC) 2374:05:54, 31 July 2006 (UTC) 2359:18:31, 29 July 2006 (UTC) 2300:19:55, 29 July 2006 (UTC) 2281:19:13, 29 July 2006 (UTC) 2258:18:53, 29 July 2006 (UTC) 2235:18:44, 29 July 2006 (UTC) 2214:18:31, 29 July 2006 (UTC) 2192:15:50, 29 July 2006 (UTC) 2171:08:42, 29 July 2006 (UTC) 2088:03:08, 29 July 2006 (UTC) 2061:02:59, 27 July 2006 (UTC) 2031:02:59, 27 July 2006 (UTC) 2013:07:28, 26 July 2006 (UTC) 1995:07:06, 26 July 2006 (UTC) 1976:06:35, 26 July 2006 (UTC) 1952:03:58, 22 July 2006 (UTC) 1926:17:52, 21 July 2006 (UTC) 1919:Knowledge:Copyrights#Iran 1909:14:32, 21 July 2006 (UTC) 1893:14:15, 21 July 2006 (UTC) 1855:07:35, 21 July 2006 (UTC) 1827:20:02, 19 July 2006 (UTC) 1804:12:11, 18 July 2006 (UTC) 1789:07:20, 13 July 2006 (UTC) 1710: 1599:18:28, 30 June 2006 (UTC) 1585:13:01, 29 June 2006 (UTC) 1564:13:01, 29 June 2006 (UTC) 1540:19:50, 28 June 2006 (UTC) 1523:15:30, 21 June 2006 (UTC) 1329: 1296:08:03, 3 April 2006 (UTC) 1287:21:22, 2 April 2006 (UTC) 1260:Hi, I changed the AfD on 1232:Collaboration of the week 1163:Jack Cole (choreographer) 1092: 911:21:35, 5 March 2006 (UTC) 898:04:17, 5 March 2006 (UTC) 879:Private international law 865:22:09, 3 March 2006 (UTC) 852:11:23, 2 March 2006 (UTC) 842:06:16, 2 March 2006 (UTC) 824:04:40, 1 March 2006 (UTC) 782:12:34, 1 March 2006 (UTC) 775:I understand. Thank you. 771:09:31, 1 March 2006 (UTC) 720:, that also explains why 2677:19:48, 22 May 2007 (UTC) 1773:22:45, 9 July 2006 (UTC) 1763:22:13, 9 July 2006 (UTC) 1742:16:15, 9 July 2006 (UTC) 1725:21:46, 5 July 2006 (UTC) 1692:05:46, 5 July 2006 (UTC) 1613:05:01, 1 July 2006 (UTC) 1608:. You said it well :) -- 1528:This Legal Times article 1457:15:13, 8 June 2006 (UTC) 1433:00:55, 8 June 2006 (UTC) 1412:16:16, 7 June 2006 (UTC) 1395:18:30, 3 June 2006 (UTC) 1366:22:19, 2 June 2006 (UTC) 1291:See 2nd reply, my talk. 1052:Tan Holdings Corporation 534:got to out of control.-- 137: 2626:Shock and awe mediation 2594:Image:Kuro5hin logo.png 2574:, including listing at 1580:to change the name. -- 529:The History of Abramoff 2725:and please be sure to 2485: 2460: 1512:User:Sholom#To_Do_List 1196:SuggestBot's talk page 1171:Rugby league in Serbia 635:User talk:DieWeibeRose 614:User talk:DieWeibeRose 170:The columnist name is 2666:, has been listed at 2484: 2452: 2423:review in each case. 2336:Image:Parsa_clean.jpg 2332:Image:Parsa_Small.jpg 2324:Image:Hafez_Small.jpg 2320:Image:Hafez_clean.jpg 2316:Image:Hafez_Fixed.jpg 2179:is in fact a copyvio 1650:Thanks for uploading 1002:Hugh Joseph Addonizio 809:Image:James-rouse.gif 547:I edited your comment 2570:, please follow the 2475: 2270:to fit a 4:3 screen. 2225:03:41, 29 April 2006 1882:tag and appropriate 1877:Non-free fair use in 1733:your opinion, please 472:Catch me up, please! 457:Israel Sniper School 272:comment was added by 124:, you will see that 27:Gallery of exemplars 2268:this Geocities site 2264:Google Image search 1666:You may add it back 1533:User:John Broughton 1506:is apparently only 1472:User:John Broughton 1374:Map of South Africa 1316:Cyde and Cite(.php) 1117:Punta Arenas, Chile 829:Jack Abramoff image 580:Jack Abramoff Edits 138:Abramoff's Religion 2727:sign your comments 2707:MfD nomination of 2514:Iran Politics Club 2486: 2468: 2066:Deletion of images 2036:Re:Cyrus the Great 1779:First image on web 1638:This media may be 1557:Jack Abramoff/CNMI 1363: 653:Talk:Jack Abramoff 498:Thanks for cleanup 371:Talk:Jack_Abramoff 2682:Nobel Prize Image 2562:Your move request 2464: 2340:Image:Parsa_X.jpg 2328:Image:Hafez_X.jpg 2177:Image:Saadi X.JPG 2127:Image:Saadi X.JPG 1950: 1730: 1729: 1648: 1647: 1485:User:User At Work 1371: 1370: 1357: 1278:Abramoff template 1188: 1187: 997:Greenberg Traurig 375:indian.senate.gov 286: 2749: 2699: 2469: 2355: 2350: 2296: 2291: 2254: 2249: 2210: 2205: 2152: 2146: 2142: 2136: 2113: 2107: 2103: 2097: 2084: 2079: 2057: 2052: 2027: 2022: 2009: 2004: 1991: 1986: 1972: 1967: 1944: 1903: 1881: 1875: 1849: 1708: 1701: 1700: 1697:Barnstar for you 1673:my contributions 1658:fair use license 1643: 1633: 1626: 1430: 1409: 1382: 1361: 1353: 1344: 1327: 1320: 1319: 1087:Ninomiya Kinjiro 1057:SS Cap Trafalgar 986: 794:RFC conversation 729: 723: 365:Abramoff E-mails 307:article right.-- 265: 176:The New Republic 2757: 2756: 2752: 2751: 2750: 2748: 2747: 2746: 2712: 2695: 2684: 2660: 2629: 2613: 2601:Ta bu shi da yu 2597: 2564: 2510: 2478: 2463: 2443: 2416: 2384: 2353: 2348: 2343: 2294: 2289: 2252: 2247: 2208: 2203: 2150: 2144: 2140: 2134: 2131:Image:Pars4.jpg 2123:Image:Perse.jpg 2111: 2105: 2101: 2095: 2082: 2077: 2068: 2055: 2050: 2038: 2025: 2020: 2007: 2002: 1989: 1984: 1970: 1965: 1962:copyrighted. -- 1959: 1934: 1917:I have updated 1901: 1879: 1873: 1870:fair use policy 1847: 1834: 1832:Ahmadinejad pic 1822:My best wishes 1796: 1781: 1752: 1735: 1699: 1683:. Thank you. — 1644: 1637: 1624: 1592: 1574: 1464: 1440: 1426: 1419: 1405: 1402: 1393: 1388: 1380: 1376: 1359: 1352: 1349: 1342: 1318: 1303: 1280: 1258: 1221: 1198:. Thanks from 1072:Leslie L. Byrne 1012:Adam Stegerwald 978: 937: 925: 908:Ta bu shi da yu 895:Ta bu shi da yu 871:Crown copyright 862:Ta bu shi da yu 849:Ta bu shi da yu 839:Ta bu shi da yu 831: 812: 800:Ta bu shi da yu 796: 727: 721: 710: 677: 582: 549: 531: 517: 504:StuffOfInterest 500: 474: 459: 406: 391:Italia Federici 367: 262: 172:Michael Crowley 140: 130:StuffOfInterest 118: 70:SunCruz Casinos 56:(still too big) 47: 29: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 2755: 2753: 2711: 2705: 2683: 2680: 2659: 2656: 2628: 2623: 2612: 2607: 2596: 2591: 2563: 2560: 2559: 2558: 2548: 2547: 2479: 2477: 2474: 2442: 2440:RPA discussion 2436: 2415: 2412: 2411: 2410: 2398: 2383: 2380: 2379: 2378: 2377: 2376: 2313: 2309: 2308: 2307: 2306: 2305: 2304: 2303: 2302: 2271: 2238: 2237: 2197: 2196: 2195: 2194: 2161: 2158:WP:IFD#July 28 2154: 2119: 2067: 2064: 2037: 2034: 1958: 1955: 1933: 1930: 1929: 1928: 1913: 1896: 1895: 1833: 1830: 1795: 1794:3arabworld.jpg 1792: 1780: 1777: 1776: 1775: 1751: 1748: 1746: 1734: 1731: 1728: 1727: 1717: 1716: 1711: 1709: 1698: 1695: 1646: 1645: 1636: 1634: 1623: 1620: 1618: 1616: 1615: 1591: 1588: 1573: 1570: 1569: 1568: 1567: 1566: 1550: 1549: 1516: 1515: 1499: 1498: 1493: 1492: 1463: 1460: 1439: 1436: 1418: 1415: 1401: 1398: 1389: 1384: 1375: 1372: 1369: 1368: 1364: 1350: 1336: 1335: 1330: 1328: 1317: 1314: 1302: 1301:Abramoff image 1299: 1279: 1276: 1257: 1251: 1229:, this week's 1223:You voted for 1220: 1217: 1186: 1185: 1184: 1183: 1178: 1173: 1168: 1165: 1160: 1155: 1153:Michael Retzer 1150: 1147: 1142: 1137: 1135:John Doolittle 1132: 1129: 1124: 1119: 1114: 1111: 1106: 1104:Cherokee dance 1101: 1096: 1091: 1090: 1089: 1084: 1079: 1074: 1069: 1064: 1059: 1054: 1049: 1044: 1039: 1034: 1029: 1027:Baron Cunliffe 1024: 1019: 1014: 1009: 1004: 999: 994: 992: 977: 974: 973: 972: 971: 970: 936: 933: 924: 921: 920: 919: 918: 917: 916: 915: 914: 913: 830: 827: 811: 806: 795: 792: 791: 790: 789: 788: 787: 786: 785: 784: 709: 704: 681:pound of flesh 676: 673: 649: 648: 647: 646: 645: 644: 626: 625: 581: 578: 577: 576: 575: 574: 548: 545: 543: 530: 527: 516: 513: 511: 499: 496: 495: 494: 473: 470: 458: 455: 443: 442: 438: 437: 426: 425: 424: 418: 405: 402: 366: 363: 362: 361: 360: 359: 358: 357: 328: 327: 326: 325: 315: 314: 275:85.250.193.168 268:The preceding 261: 258: 257: 256: 255: 254: 253: 252: 251: 250: 249: 248: 247: 246: 222: 168: 139: 136: 117: 114: 113: 112: 111: 110: 84: 83: 78: 72: 67: 62: 57: 46: 43: 28: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2754: 2745: 2744: 2740: 2736: 2732: 2728: 2724: 2720: 2716: 2710: 2706: 2704: 2703: 2700: 2698: 2692: 2689: 2681: 2679: 2678: 2675: 2674: 2669: 2665: 2657: 2655: 2654: 2650: 2646: 2642: 2638: 2637:Armedblowfish 2634: 2627: 2624: 2622: 2621: 2618: 2611: 2608: 2606: 2605: 2602: 2595: 2592: 2590: 2589: 2585: 2581: 2577: 2573: 2569: 2561: 2557: 2554: 2550: 2549: 2546: 2543: 2542: 2537: 2532: 2528: 2527: 2526: 2525: 2522: 2517: 2515: 2509: 2507: 2503: 2499: 2494: 2490: 2483: 2473: 2472: 2467: 2459: 2457: 2451: 2448: 2441: 2437: 2435: 2434: 2430: 2426: 2421: 2413: 2409: 2406: 2405: 2399: 2395: 2394: 2393: 2392: 2389: 2381: 2375: 2372: 2371: 2365: 2364: 2363: 2362: 2361: 2360: 2357: 2356: 2351: 2345:Thank you, -- 2341: 2337: 2333: 2329: 2325: 2321: 2317: 2312: 2301: 2298: 2297: 2292: 2284: 2283: 2282: 2279: 2276: 2272: 2269: 2265: 2261: 2260: 2259: 2256: 2255: 2250: 2242: 2241: 2240: 2239: 2236: 2233: 2230: 2226: 2222: 2218: 2217: 2216: 2215: 2212: 2211: 2206: 2193: 2190: 2187: 2182: 2178: 2174: 2173: 2172: 2169: 2168: 2162: 2159: 2155: 2149: 2139: 2132: 2128: 2124: 2120: 2117: 2110: 2100: 2092: 2091: 2090: 2089: 2086: 2085: 2080: 2072: 2065: 2063: 2062: 2059: 2058: 2053: 2046: 2043: 2035: 2033: 2032: 2029: 2028: 2023: 2015: 2014: 2011: 2010: 2005: 1997: 1996: 1993: 1992: 1987: 1978: 1977: 1974: 1973: 1968: 1956: 1954: 1953: 1948: 1943: 1939: 1931: 1927: 1924: 1920: 1916: 1915: 1914: 1911: 1910: 1907: 1905: 1904: 1894: 1891: 1890: 1885: 1878: 1871: 1867: 1863: 1859: 1858: 1857: 1856: 1853: 1851: 1850: 1842: 1839: 1838: 1831: 1829: 1828: 1825: 1820: 1819: 1814: 1811: 1806: 1805: 1802: 1793: 1791: 1790: 1787: 1778: 1774: 1771: 1767: 1766: 1765: 1764: 1761: 1757: 1749: 1747: 1744: 1743: 1740: 1732: 1726: 1723: 1719: 1718: 1715: 1712: 1707: 1702: 1696: 1694: 1693: 1690: 1688: 1687: 1682: 1678: 1674: 1669: 1667: 1663: 1659: 1655: 1654: 1641: 1635: 1632: 1628: 1627: 1621: 1619: 1614: 1611: 1607: 1603: 1602: 1601: 1600: 1597: 1589: 1587: 1586: 1583: 1579: 1571: 1565: 1562: 1558: 1554: 1553: 1552: 1551: 1548: 1544: 1543: 1542: 1541: 1538: 1534: 1529: 1525: 1524: 1521: 1513: 1509: 1505: 1501: 1500: 1497:involved/etc. 1495: 1494: 1490: 1489:Jack Abramoff 1486: 1482: 1478: 1473: 1469: 1468: 1467: 1462:More scandals 1461: 1459: 1458: 1454: 1450: 1446: 1437: 1435: 1434: 1429: 1424: 1416: 1414: 1413: 1408: 1399: 1397: 1396: 1392: 1387: 1383: 1373: 1367: 1362: 1356: 1354: 1346: 1345: 1338: 1337: 1334: 1331: 1326: 1321: 1315: 1313: 1312: 1309: 1300: 1298: 1297: 1294: 1289: 1288: 1285: 1277: 1275: 1274: 1271: 1267: 1263: 1255: 1252: 1250: 1249: 1246: 1242: 1238: 1234: 1233: 1228: 1227: 1218: 1216: 1215: 1212: 1208: 1203: 1201: 1197: 1192: 1182: 1179: 1177: 1174: 1172: 1169: 1166: 1164: 1161: 1159: 1156: 1154: 1151: 1148: 1146: 1143: 1141: 1138: 1136: 1133: 1130: 1128: 1125: 1123: 1120: 1118: 1115: 1112: 1110: 1107: 1105: 1102: 1100: 1097: 1094: 1093: 1088: 1085: 1083: 1080: 1078: 1075: 1073: 1070: 1068: 1065: 1063: 1062:Wire transfer 1060: 1058: 1055: 1053: 1050: 1048: 1045: 1043: 1040: 1038: 1035: 1033: 1030: 1028: 1025: 1023: 1020: 1018: 1015: 1013: 1010: 1008: 1005: 1003: 1000: 998: 995: 993: 990: 989: 987: 984: 982: 975: 969: 966: 962: 961: 960: 957: 953: 949: 948: 947: 946: 943: 934: 932: 930: 922: 912: 909: 905: 901: 900: 899: 896: 892: 888: 883: 880: 876: 872: 868: 867: 866: 863: 859: 858:as per normal 855: 854: 853: 850: 846: 845: 844: 843: 840: 836: 828: 826: 825: 822: 818: 810: 807: 805: 804: 801: 793: 783: 780: 779: 774: 773: 772: 769: 765: 764: 763: 760: 759: 754: 750: 749: 748: 745: 741: 740: 739: 738: 735: 734: 726: 719: 715: 708: 705: 703: 702: 699: 693: 692: 689: 684: 682: 674: 672: 671: 668: 662: 661: 658: 654: 643: 640: 636: 632: 631: 630: 629: 628: 627: 624: 621: 620: 615: 611: 610: 609: 608: 605: 601: 599: 595: 591: 590: 588: 579: 573: 570: 565: 564: 563: 562: 561: 560: 557: 556: 546: 544: 541: 540: 537: 528: 526: 525: 522: 515:NetVision IPs 514: 512: 509: 508: 505: 497: 493: 490: 486: 485: 484: 483: 480: 471: 469: 468: 465: 456: 454: 451: 447: 440: 439: 436: 433: 432: 427: 422: 421: 419: 415: 414: 413: 410: 403: 401: 400: 397: 392: 387: 386: 383: 378: 376: 372: 364: 356: 353: 352: 347: 343: 342: 341: 340: 339: 338: 337: 336: 333: 322: 321: 320: 319: 318: 313: 310: 306: 301: 299: 297: 294: 289: 288: 287: 284: 280: 276: 273: 271: 259: 245: 242: 238: 233: 232: 231: 228: 223: 221: 220: 215: 211: 206: 205: 204: 203: 202: 199: 195: 190: 186: 185: 184: 181: 177: 173: 169: 166: 161: 160: 159: 158: 152: 151: 150: 149: 146: 135: 134: 131: 127: 123: 115: 109: 106: 101: 98:Nice work on 97: 96: 95: 94: 93: 92: 89: 88:The Cunctator 82: 79: 76: 73: 71: 68: 66: 63: 61: 58: 55: 54:Jack Abramoff 52: 51: 50: 44: 42: 41: 38: 34: 26: 19: 18:User talk:Kwh 2735:Ham Pastrami 2713: 2696: 2685: 2671: 2661: 2630: 2614: 2598: 2565: 2539: 2518: 2513: 2511: 2506:subst:smile3 2502:subst:smile2 2487: 2461: 2455: 2453: 2444: 2417: 2402: 2385: 2368: 2346: 2344: 2310: 2287: 2245: 2224: 2220: 2201: 2198: 2165: 2075: 2071:User:Darkred 2069: 2048: 2039: 2018: 2016: 2000: 1998: 1982: 1979: 1963: 1960: 1957:Cyrus images 1935: 1912: 1899: 1897: 1887: 1845: 1843: 1840: 1835: 1821: 1815: 1807: 1797: 1782: 1755: 1753: 1745: 1736: 1713: 1684: 1676: 1670: 1651: 1649: 1639: 1617: 1605: 1593: 1578:this request 1575: 1546: 1526: 1517: 1507: 1465: 1441: 1420: 1403: 1377: 1340: 1332: 1304: 1290: 1281: 1259: 1230: 1224: 1222: 1219:COTW Project 1204: 1193: 1189: 1122:Neurohacking 1042:Dennis Vacco 979: 938: 926: 903: 881: 857: 834: 832: 813: 797: 776: 756: 731: 711: 694: 685: 678: 663: 650: 639:DieWeibeRose 617: 604:DieWeibeRose 596: 592: 585: 583: 553: 550: 542: 532: 518: 510: 501: 475: 460: 452: 448: 444: 429: 411: 407: 388: 382:DieWeibeRose 379: 368: 349: 329: 316: 309:DieWeibeRose 304: 292: 267: 263: 217: 214:psychopathic 192: 188: 155: 141: 119: 116:Welcome back 85: 48: 30: 2498:subst:smile 2414:one of them 2388:Pseudotumor 1872:, with the 1610:Doc Tropics 1576:Please see 1545:You wrote: 1131:Add Sources 1082:Adam Schiff 1047:Lou Sheldon 633:Replied at 612:Replied at 584:Kwh wrote: 404:Change Back 210:sociopathic 187:Found it " 126:62.0.181.94 2688:discussion 2673:Abu badali 2635:. Thanks! 1942:Rick Block 1686:Rebelguys2 1245:PDXblazers 1211:SuggestBot 1145:Troglodyte 1022:Tom Feeney 981:SuggestBot 324:tolerated. 198:Spin Watch 2697:aNubiSIII 2580:Wknight94 2553:Patchouli 2536:MEHR News 2521:Patchouli 2489:Patchouli 2425:rootology 1923:Patchouli 1596:Isotope23 1417:Thank You 1400:Thank You 1243:article. 1200:ForteTuba 1032:Abbécourt 821:trácht ar 817:Boothy443 725:db-repost 714:SpinnWebe 707:SpinnWebe 225:matter.-- 191:he said. 122:block log 2719:deletion 2649:contribs 2504:}} or {{ 2493:WikiLove 2466:Leflyman 2148:imagevio 1898:Thanks, 1677:articles 1662:orphaned 1590:Comments 1504:Coingate 1470:I asked 1241:standard 1237:featured 1176:El Deseo 1099:Hashcash 940:thanks. 567:point.-- 305:Newsweek 283:contribs 270:unsigned 260:Revision 2349:Spahbod 2290:Spahbod 2248:Spahbod 2204:Spahbod 2104:and/or 2078:Spahbod 2051:Spahbod 2021:Spahbod 2003:Spahbod 1985:Spahbod 1966:Spahbod 1841:Hello, 1770:Striver 1760:Striver 1640:deleted 1293:Merecat 1284:Merecat 1181:KIL-168 1095:Cleanup 965:ka1iban 956:ka1iban 942:ka1iban 891:WP:HELP 698:Zompist 346:civilly 37:Tomcool 2531:WP:PUI 2500:}}, {{ 2447:WP:RPA 2116:WP:CSD 1902:Tewfik 1848:Tewfik 1824:MARVEL 1801:MARVEL 1786:Bwithh 1582:Sholom 1561:Sholom 1537:Sholom 1520:Sholom 1423:WP:ANI 1308:Mark83 1266:WP:RfD 1264:to an 1167:Expand 1149:Wikify 768:Stifle 753:WP:WEB 744:Stifle 667:Sholom 657:Sholom 569:M4bwav 536:M4bwav 521:M4bwav 489:Sholom 479:Sholom 464:M4bwav 453:-Brad 412:-Brad 396:M4bwav 332:M4bwav 241:Sholom 227:M4bwav 194:there. 180:M4bwav 163:show: 145:M4bwav 105:Sholom 2617:Hjb26 2576:WP:RM 2278:→Talk 2232:→Talk 2189:→Talk 2129:, or 2045:→Talk 1862:Jimbo 1739:Ste4k 1535:) -- 1381:Philc 1256:moved 1113:Merge 991:Stubs 887:WP:RD 688:Spinn 16:< 2739:talk 2645:mail 2641:talk 2633:here 2584:talk 2438:re: 2420:this 2275:♠ SG 2229:♠ SG 2186:♠ SG 2042:♠ SG 1947:talk 1866:here 1508:part 1428:Mike 1407:Mike 1343:Will 923:COTW 893:? - 882:does 835:that 833:Now 279:talk 2541:KWH 2404:KWH 2370:KWH 2167:KWH 2138:ifd 2109:nsd 2099:nld 1921:.-- 1889:KWH 1756:are 1750:Pic 1722:BJK 1518:-- 1445:J.S 1438:TWS 1431:• 1410:• 904:not 889:or 778:KWH 758:KWH 733:KWH 637:.-- 619:KWH 555:KWH 431:KWH 369:At 351:KWH 285:) . 219:KWH 174:of 157:KWH 2741:) 2651:) 2586:) 2496:{{ 2431:) 2314:* 2151:}} 2145:{{ 2141:}} 2135:{{ 2125:, 2112:}} 2106:{{ 2102:}} 2096:{{ 1880:}} 1874:{{ 1816:¹ 1514:). 1455:) 1355:) 1270:MJ 819:| 815:-- 755:. 728:}} 722:{{ 616:. 602:-- 394:-- 330:-- 281:• 2737:( 2647:| 2643:| 2639:( 2582:( 2458:" 2454:" 2429:T 2427:( 2354:☼ 2295:☼ 2253:☼ 2209:☼ 2160:. 2118:. 2083:☼ 2056:☼ 2026:☼ 2008:☼ 1990:☼ 1971:☼ 1949:) 1945:( 1642:. 1453:c 1451:| 1449:t 1447:( 1391:C 1386:T 1360:T 1351:@ 1347:( 1239:- 277:( 266:—

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index