979:
1129:
However, such misunderstandings and ones like them, especially issues disingenuously taken out of context like they constantly were on my Arbcom case, are what serve to encourage Arbcom to take them at face value and and desysop useful editors because they can. I would hope that some members of the new arbcom are literally cringing in retrospect at some of the decisions they have made - while others of course, are probably rubbing their hands in glee at the outcomes. .
1146:
calculus of how upset/happy various
Knowledge (XXG) interactions make you feel and of what other things you could be doing with your time, all of which are entirely subjective to the editor in question. What I would sayâspeaking as a member of the highly exclusive club (I believe only four members) of people who've been formally expelled from Arbcomâis not to feel you're somehow tainted by having been stripped of a permission, no matter what the circumstances were.
832:
922:
1152:
you a harsher punishment than I normally would despite the fact that you haven't done anything else problematic for a long time" tends to become unstuck). Unless you're someone like Essjay who lost the bit owing to major abuse with serious potential consequences, within a couple of weeks nobody is looking at you as "that editor who got stripped of permissions" (as
Yngvadottir can testify, having been herself the subject of a rarer-than-hen's-teeth
480:, even if you, I, and others find ourselves on different sides of the fence - Without having had anything to do with him, I was a target for his PA and harassment for years and as an admin totally disallowed from doing anything about it. Ironically, when I did unwittingly call his sock a disruptive troll, it was used against me as a FoF by a short-sighted Arbcom. Whoever was right and whoever was wrong,
338:. I'm retiring and apart from a few odds and ends, and going to Wikimania on my doorstep this year to bid farewell to friends and encourage others, I won't be around much more. and whatever the conjecture, it's not entirely due to Arbcom or its participants. I do however feel quite refreshed without the adminship Sword of Damocles hanging over my head. As I said above, I'm
1182:
should be sending you a large heaping of THANKS and a Rolex
President for all you've done. Well, you certainly have my sincerest thanks and gratitude. Wishing you only the best, Kudz!! Hopefully next year I'll be able to raise a glass of brewski in your honor provided I'm still around and can make it to Bangkok.
193:, to the news I woke up to this Sunday morning is a very big loss of altitude and demonstrates that the Committee will not only pass judgement, but will deliberately make harsh examples of those who have done a lot for the project and made a name for themselves for the good things, and will fall hardest.
287:
It's also not astonishing that having been instrumental in successfully bringing about some of the most important changes on
Knowledge (XXG), having spent lots of money and time attending Wikimanias and meet ups, and my thorough disillusionment with the way the WMF 'manages' its projects, that while
253:
as an explanation for their curious mode of collaboration, they really have my sympathy, but perhaps they will take a moment to reflect how stressful a) going through RfA in the first place is, and b) being subject to an almost 2 month long online virtual-reality Arbcom case can be, particularly one
208:
It's a shame that so many people, including those in elected office - even the
Arbitration Committee - treat, or have treated, such a serious project as Knowledge (XXG) as a place to anonymously vent their real-live frustrations and inadequacies and play power games in Knowledge (XXG), making it not
1128:
in which it seems that you had not fully understood what it was all about, and I asked you, also politely, not to continue the issue. I did not in any way express banning you from my talk page, indeed , for someone with your intellect I was rather taken aback by your interpretation of the situation.
306:
I appreciate the gratitude, but I think you may have misread my intent. I'm not saying that your actions were correct or that criticism wasn't warranted. I AM saying that the manner in which evidence was presented was unfair, highly biased, and (to be blunt) inappropriate. Reasonable people can look
159:
raised though I am well aware it will be discussed in both positive and negative tones both on and off Wiki. Well, there isn't really going to be much of a statement, but as an editor to join the club of what may be some of the
English Knowledge (XXG)'s most prominent users to be desysopped in quick
1151:
The
Knowledge (XXG) hivemind may have many faults, but one trait whicb is genuinely admirable is the fact that it tends to judge editors on what they do, not on what their past history was (which is in large part why any admin trying variations on "given the length of your past block log I'm giving
220:
The remedy cited "conduct" concerns, not "trust" concerns, and the only tools I will miss are those concerned with the trust for viewing of deleted material for COI, UPE, SPI, and blocking blatant vandalism (I never worked at AIV) and especially spam, areas in which I have at times been very active
1095:
I don't actually recall telling you to stay off my talk page, but you mentioning it has caused me to do some research - admittedly reluctantly, because the only memories I have of
Knowledge (XXG) already, are what a nasty cesspit it can become, despite the good intentions one may have. I think it
181:
and with equal clarity misguidedly put my faith in the
Committee - any later claims that I had not taken part and which were used by the drafters in their FoF, and which 'lack respect for the Committee' are either deliberate or unintentional untruths. But I take being removed of my tools
1181:
editors, especially when I believe a remedy was overkill in a situation that could have been handled without such drastic measures. It makes me sad to see an editor/admin who has devoted 20 years of his life to WP and has done so much for the project to end-up semi-retired in this manner. The WMF
774:
We only conversed briefly, but I was aware of the great work and legacy you had on
Knowledge (XXG). I felt the outcome of the case was harsh, and discarded a decade of work over your use of language/approach (which you mainly withdrew). There were better ways to handle this that would have been
356:
the stigma of being desysoped and the way it was done is definitely something that should never happen again. It's time to take a long, deep look at the way Arbcom functions - and ANI which has been the subject of research - but it won't be in my lifetime. I look back and see the positive side of
171:
that I do not have the energy to pick them out and list all the total errors in the so called FoF, or to analyse the spite, vengeance, personal attacks and disingenuous comments voiced by both involved and totally uninvolved users; those are the elements, far more than the outcome, that make the
346:
they reached it, and additionally they and their clerks openly permitted the near blockworthy hostility, incivility, and personal attacks by those commenting, many of whom don't actually have an axe to grind, and from those who think they have. I never knew that Arbcom cases could be such dirty
262:
which accords less dignity to the the accused than a court of criminal law in a civilised democratic country. Try to imagine getting over the last ten minutes in a passenger plane that's definitely going to crash. I have. It's a lot worse than simply being fired for breaking the company's rules.
1145:
Seeing as I've been pingedâĶ I never engage in "please come back"; whether or not someone increases, reduces, or abandons altogether their activity is the one decision that should be entirely down to the editor in question since "would I rather be doing something else with my time?" is a complex
1075:
I won't be back. I lost my tools based on prima facie evidence and an Arbcom who were exited at the thought of desysoping yet another dedicated, long-term hard worker who has done more than most to get new policies and systems rolled out. At over 70 it's not losing the tools that matters - that
1056:
Kudpung, you banned me from your talk page but I am afraid I am going to violate that just this one time, and I quite understand if you or a friend removes this post. I'm sorry to see you lose your bit, because I know that despite our many differences you have always had the interests of the
77:
Kudpung is admonished for failing to meet the conduct standards expected of an administrator. In future, he is urged to ensure that he remains civil in his interactions with both new and regular editors, and responds to feedback on his conduct objectively and with an assumption of good
357:
what I have contributed no Knowledge (XXG), but I'm done with it now. I've cancelled this year's itinary of talks and editathons lined up for schools and colleges in Isan - it wouldn't be right for someone branded as a Wikicriminal like me to be organising and hosting such events!
409:
I never saw any problems in your conduct, Kudpung, but I'm that guy, too. I'm pondering cursing out the arbs that voted for this ridiculous slap in the face. This website is going downhill fast and you may as well bail now, as things won't get any better in the near term.
307:
at the full context and may/may not come to the same conclusion; reasonable people can disagree. Obviously some from ArbCom agreed with me. Others did not. I wish you the best of luck in the future and I think a more conciliatory attitude would be more helpful as an admin.
39:
has been postponed until 2021 which will mark 20 years of Knowledge (XXG) and 21 years of me living in this country. Health permitting, and if I am still around, I hope to see many of you here. If you want any genuine, accurate advance information of any kind, just email
245:
who in the face of a lot of thoroughly unwarranted criticism has valiantly, but unsuccessfully attempted to preserve the integrity of the Committee and its process. I hope he will continue to do so on future dubious cases and without the barracking from the sidelines.
288:
I am proud to have been part of it, I have no desire at my age to continue in these backroom charades which ironically, are behind what is still one of the most visited websites ever and the best source of traditional encyclopedic knowledge in the world. (
316:-venues were not utilized as much as necessary to even hear the case. While I disagree with your ultimate conclusion, I tip my hat to you and the difficult job you have. I challenge you to look a little deeper into context and not just what is presented.
232:
most sincerely who was the only person who had the courage to speak in my defence - which illustrates what ominous powers and influence the Committee exerts - and I hope that having done so will not reflect badly on her. My thanks also to
167:'s desysoping was a catastrophic misjudgment by the Arbitration Committee. I will not characterize on the Committee's final decision in my case - which I am forced to accept anyway - but the way they reached it was flawed. There are
545:
for all the days (pre and post) of the conference. Looking forward to meeting old friends who can make it there, and some new ones I haven't met face-to-face yet, and my enemies? Well don't let that put you off from coming - you
394:
I'm very sad to see this as well. I hope you'll still be involved. Many of us still appreciate all the work you've done for this project. I've also removed the LTA who was just trolling you. Ignore him, he has no life.
1076:
doesn't bother me in the slightest, but it's the vile emphasis they made, and allowed to be made, on the deliberate character assasination, and pretending it needed two long drawn out months to reach a decision.
221:
and in which the hundreds of hours are not reflected in an edit count even a high as 100K. I can easily live with that as can other editors who for various reasons have voluntarily handed in their tools such as
283:
evidence and does not properly examine the evidence (despite whatever might be claimed), and where many of whom are absent at any one time or recusing themselves for various reasons best known to themselves.
1160:). Even Framâprobably the highest-profile desysop of them allâhasn't suffered any lasting damage to his reputation or to his ability to edit Knowledge (XXG); the admin toolset really isn't that important. â
351:
should look a little deeper into context and not just what is presented, especially when they took almost two months to reach a conclusion. Whatever anyone thinks of me, it's up to them, but for people like
991:
It saddens me to see you lose your admin rights in such a fashion. I somehow missed seeing the Arbcom case until it was almost over. I hope to still see you around the encyclopedia from time to time. ~
84:
is supposed to be the final step in the dispute resolution process. The community is reminded that attempting to have a community-wide discussion of problematic behavior early on can prevent unnecessary
1157:
867:
858:
74:
For his failure to meet the conduct standards expected of an administrator, Kudpung's administrative user rights are removed. He may regain them at any time via a successful request for adminship.
716:, but after nearly a decade trying to get NPP where it is today, I actually relinquished my hold on it nearly two years ago already to a competent coordinator team which includes, among others,
155:
Please note that the following is a personal statement, made solely to explain my thoughts in response to the ArbCom decision. It is not in any way an attempt to re-debate any of the
807:
I am sorry to see this. You will always have my respect. I also hope, in this case, "semi retired" would mean/be equivalent of "very busy". See you around old friend. âusernamekiran
1280:
I think you should come back in another role for yourself. I really think you should drink your milk, get back on your horse, and come back and create another 100k edits.
214:
59:
618:
You've done something invaluable by nominating so many candidates for adminship, and by voting thoughtfully at that venue consistently. Just some appreciation.
934:
Disagreed with you many times at many AFD's, that said you were always a net positive to those discussions both in your personal and administrative approach.
523:
but as I use Knowledge (XXG) daily for other reasons, I'm likely to edit the occasional typo I see, or add a source somewhere, or remove some blatant promo.
432:
There seems to be little room here for old men with common sense and a singular goal of creating an accurate, relevant, and readable encyclopedia.
978:
850:
160:
succession for reasons other than breaches of T&U and serious abuse of tools or trust, there are a couple of things that need to be said.
724:. Ironically, an innocent comment I made at WT:NPP is 50% of what got me hung, drawn, quartered, pitchforked, tarred and feathered at Arbcom!
751:
694:
Hope you come back soon as you will be greatly missed at New Page Patrol, couldn't have disagreed more with the decision of Arbcom, regards
685:
172:
case hard to swallow and why I have campaigned for years to keep non-involved editors away from ANI and Arbcom cases and to clean up RfA.
875:
789:
Sad to see this, thank you for your work and contributions here, they are greatly appreciated, Take care and I wish you all the best. â
347:
affairs. I believe the Committee's composition, its electoral process, and its way of working, are what should be challenged and that
217:
shows a remarkable imbalance between involved and non involved participants and possibly even also reveals who has an axe to grind.
277:. It's hardly surprising that by now I certainly have a much reduced respect for an Arbitration Committee that relies entirely on
238:
213:, or in the case of some, use it for financial gain with impunity, or as a platform for some socio-political movements. The
312:
As for ArbCom, I do not agree with your conclusions. "I'm offended" was WAY overused as a rationale. Likewise, I feel that
453:
I'll chime in here, as I somewhat feel I belong in the old men group too...so thank you for your hard and dedicated work.
268:
A personal attack is something that is personal. It has to target somebody specific, and it has to target their identity.
1158:
managed to unite pretty much everyone, regardless of their stance on the underlying issue, in disgust at its ineptitude
550:
find that my 'bark is definitely worse than my bite' (if the non BE speakers among you can understand the expression).
854:
717:
655:
857:, for "I am not an ungeheures Ungeziefer", - piano-player living in Thailand, repeating (6 August 2010): you are an
939:
1205:
Count me among those who will miss your presence here. I'm glad we had a chance to collaborate at the revival of
1057:
encyclopaedia at heart, and you have worked long and hard for it. I hope to see you around again, and stay safe.
637:
609:
780:
681:
418:
222:
70:
has now closed and the final decision is viewable at the link above. The following remedies have been enacted:
81:
1192:
808:
623:
512:
266:
Finally, I will mention this quote from another admin which has been on my user page for a very long time:
883:
439:
400:
1062:
952:
935:
699:
604:
Thank you for your work here. I still hope that I will see and hear from you on Knowledge (XXG) though!
176:
128:? I heard the rounds of applause and the popping of champagne corks in the Arbcom office from here ;)
1229:
634:
605:
353:
164:
775:
fairer to all. I could not see the logic in it, and how it would be a net benefit Knowledge (XXG).
1101:
776:
677:
412:
1153:
1001:
484:'s bitstripping was an earlier example of total incompetency of what is supposed to be an Arbcom.
105:
Regretfully it came to this Kudpung, your sysop flag was removed following a request by ArbCom at
1109:
747:
619:
507:
458:
385:
831:
921:
1134:
1081:
1022:
960:
902:
894:
879:
729:
574:
555:
528:
493:
469:
433:
396:
362:
296:
241:
went totally unheeded by the drafting and voting arbitrators. My greatest respect goes out to
133:
17:
1283:
1256:
1121:
1092:
1072:
1058:
1047:
837:
Thank you for service over 14 years, for quality articles about schools and places, such as
742:
Thanks for everything you've done as a Knowledge (XXG) user and administrator. Best wishes,
713:
695:
599:
590:
481:
90:
1290:
1263:
1236:
1218:
1195:
1164:
1138:
1125:
1097:
1085:
1066:
1051:
1026:
1005:
964:
943:
906:
887:
871:
811:
802:
784:
769:
755:
733:
703:
689:
671:
662:
643:
627:
613:
594:
578:
559:
532:
514:
497:
462:
444:
425:
404:
389:
366:
325:
300:
190:
186:
182:
for using my Miranda rights after the first indictment as almost an unintended compliment.
137:
119:
110:
99:
1224:
1186:
1161:
1113:
838:
566:
537:
Despite some weird, snide, and irrelevant comment on the Arbcom case, health permitting I
321:
313:
106:
1014:
994:
842:
790:
764:
721:
271:
259:
585:
My condolences, and thank you for staying to give as much as you feel able to give. --
1214:
846:
743:
454:
381:
125:
114:
1275:
1248:
1130:
1077:
1018:
956:
898:
725:
570:
551:
524:
489:
358:
292:
229:
129:
67:
342:
seeking to re-debate the outcome of the case, but I am deeply concerned about the
175:
I quite clearly made my commitment to the Arbcom case in the 1,000 or so words at
1042:
Be well, take care, and remember that wikipedia doesn't actually matter. At all.
586:
279:
234:
651:
Wishing you all the best mate. Spend some quality time with those grandkids! â
1183:
1117:
335:
317:
255:
242:
1177:
As customary, Iridescent made some good points; however, I am one of "those"
1105:
761:
1210:
334:
It's all water under the bridge and I don't think I misread your intent,
210:
878:. I hope that you'll find a way that we don't have to miss you. --
874:
aka the cabal of the outcast. My response to an arbcom case was
250:
1223:
Sorry to see you go. Thanks for the good times. All the best.
1036:
There were many things I could have said in this situation.
380:
I'm sorry too, Kudpung. I really enjoy working with you.
189:(a 100+ support was quite a big thing in those days) and
290:
So that concludes yet another pompous speech by Kudpung)
477:
274:
203:
200:
197:
168:
478:
this was another example of your extraordinary wisdom
205:
reiterate the comments following the BHG desysoping.
569:
I look forward to it. BKK is not to far from Perth.
60:Knowledge (XXG):Arbitration/Requests/Case/Kudpung
1039:I didn't. Because none of them actually matter.
676:I'm also sorry to see you go. All the best! â
163:As expressed by a very large number of users,
8:
249:To anyone who has, or claims to suffer from
151:Statement by Kudpung on the ArbCom decision
46:
486:Plus ça change, plus c'est la mÊme chose
473:
239:short but hugely important observation
7:
641:(the apparently calm and reasonable)
632:Just.. arrrrrgghhh! All the best:
169:so many parallels to this statement
1124:participated. There then followed
853:, for help with German, including
24:
977:
920:
830:
109:. You may seek restoration via
1253:Your not bailing out, are you?
89:For the Arbitration Committee,
191:this piece of incredible irony
113:at any time. Best regards, â
66:An arbitration case regarding
1:
405:23:59, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
390:23:08, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
100:22:51, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
600:âĪïļ 15:09, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
474:No good deed goes unpunished
187:this, 9 years ago to the day
1156:lÃĻse-majestÃĐ desysop which
855:Myth of the clean Wehrmacht
712:Thanks for the kind words,
1306:
760:Thank you for everything.
506:Sorry to see this happen.
1237:02:14, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
1219:17:35, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
1196:14:32, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
1165:09:32, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
1139:05:12, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
1086:04:16, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
1067:15:34, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
1052:11:17, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
1027:02:32, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
1006:19:54, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
976:
965:01:34, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
944:01:32, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
919:
907:00:17, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
888:22:58, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
812:11:03, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
803:10:27, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
785:14:59, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
770:14:47, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
756:05:26, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
734:05:39, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
704:21:19, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
690:18:11, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
672:20:11, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
644:19:32, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
628:05:15, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
614:03:00, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
595:13:46, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
579:02:23, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
560:05:42, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
543:Wikimania 2020 in Bangkok
533:04:53, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
515:03:17, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
498:00:26, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
463:09:23, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
445:01:38, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
426:00:31, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
367:02:31, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
326:19:24, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
301:04:49, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
138:11:52, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
120:00:29, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
33:Wikimania 2020 in BANGKOK
1291:19:19, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
1264:14:45, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
870:of Precious, a prize of
1098:this interesting thread
866:You are recipient no.
851:project Worcestershire
656:Insertcleverphrasehere
519:It actually should be
228:I would like to thank
225:to mention just one.
928:The Admin's Barnstar
209:much better than a
178:Statement by Kudpung
913:A barnstar for you!
876:singing in defiance
223:Boing! said Zebedee
196:The comments here:
859:awesome Wikipedian
1189:
1011:
1010:
1004:
949:
948:
767:
668:
667:
666:
647:
375:(Semi) Retirement
291:
276:
147:
146:
18:User talk:Kudpung
1297:
1288:
1286:
1279:
1261:
1259:
1252:
1232:
1187:
1179:please come back
1050:
1000:
997:
981:
974:
973:
953:Hell in a Bucket
936:Hell in a Bucket
924:
917:
916:
834:
800:
795:
765:
659:
658:
654:
642:
510:
424:
421:
415:
289:
270:
117:
47:
42:
36:
1305:
1304:
1300:
1299:
1298:
1296:
1295:
1294:
1284:
1282:
1273:
1271:
1257:
1255:
1246:
1244:
1235:
1230:
1191:
1131:Kudpung āļāļļāļāļāļķāđāļ
1104:, and in which
1078:Kudpung āļāļļāļāļāļķāđāļ
1046:
1034:
1019:Kudpung āļāļļāļāļāļķāđāļ
1002:problem solving
995:
985:Flowers for you
972:
970:Flowers for you
957:Kudpung āļāļļāļāļāļķāđāļ
915:
899:Kudpung āļāļļāļāļāļķāđāļ
864:
863:
839:Malvern College
835:
820:
796:
791:
766:âdistÃĶnt writeâ
726:Kudpung āļāļļāļāļāļķāđāļ
665:
606:Graeme Bartlett
571:Kudpung āļāļļāļāļāļķāđāļ
552:Kudpung āļāļļāļāļāļķāđāļ
525:Kudpung āļāļļāļāļāļķāđāļ
508:
490:Kudpung āļāļļāļāļāļķāđāļ
419:
413:
411:
377:
359:Kudpung āļāļļāļāļāļķāđāļ
354:BrownHairedGirl
293:Kudpung āļāļļāļāļāļķāđāļ
165:BrownHairedGirl
153:
148:
130:Kudpung āļāļļāļāļāļķāđāļ
115:
64:
52:
44:
38:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1303:
1301:
1270:
1267:
1243:
1240:
1227:
1203:
1202:
1201:
1200:
1199:
1198:
1185:
1170:
1169:
1168:
1167:
1149:
1147:
1143:
1102:Britishfinance
1089:
1088:
1033:
1030:
1009:
1008:
988:
987:
982:
971:
968:
947:
946:
931:
930:
925:
914:
911:
910:
909:
843:Wellingborough
829:
827:
822:
821:
819:
816:
815:
814:
805:
787:
777:Britishfinance
772:
758:
739:
738:
737:
736:
707:
706:
692:
678:John M Wolfson
674:
660:
649:
648:
630:
616:
602:
597:
582:
581:
563:
562:
535:
517:
503:
502:
501:
500:
466:
465:
448:
447:
429:
428:
414:Chris Troutman
407:
392:
376:
373:
372:
371:
370:
369:
329:
328:
309:
308:
260:kangaroo court
152:
149:
145:
144:
143:
142:
141:
140:
87:
86:
79:
75:
63:
57:
54:
53:
50:
45:
41:
37:
28:
26:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1302:
1293:
1292:
1289:
1287:
1277:
1268:
1266:
1265:
1262:
1260:
1250:
1241:
1239:
1238:
1233:
1226:
1221:
1220:
1216:
1212:
1208:
1197:
1194:
1190:
1184:
1180:
1176:
1175:
1174:
1173:
1172:
1171:
1166:
1163:
1159:
1155:
1150:
1148:
1144:
1142:
1141:
1140:
1136:
1132:
1127:
1123:
1119:
1115:
1111:
1107:
1103:
1099:
1096:goes back to
1094:
1091:
1090:
1087:
1083:
1079:
1074:
1071:
1070:
1069:
1068:
1064:
1060:
1054:
1053:
1049:
1043:
1040:
1037:
1031:
1029:
1028:
1024:
1020:
1016:
1007:
1003:
999:
998:
990:
989:
986:
983:
980:
975:
969:
967:
966:
962:
958:
954:
945:
941:
937:
933:
932:
929:
926:
923:
918:
912:
908:
904:
900:
896:
892:
891:
890:
889:
885:
881:
877:
873:
869:
862:
860:
856:
852:
848:
847:Milford Haven
844:
840:
833:
828:
826:
817:
813:
810:
806:
804:
801:
799:
794:
788:
786:
782:
778:
773:
771:
768:
763:
759:
757:
753:
752:contributions
749:
745:
744:Lord Sjones23
741:
740:
735:
731:
727:
723:
719:
715:
711:
710:
709:
708:
705:
701:
697:
693:
691:
687:
683:
679:
675:
673:
670:
669:
664:
657:
650:
645:
640:
639:
636:
631:
629:
625:
621:
620:Airbornemihir
617:
615:
611:
607:
603:
601:
598:
596:
592:
588:
584:
583:
580:
576:
572:
568:
565:
564:
561:
557:
553:
549:
544:
540:
536:
534:
530:
526:
522:
518:
516:
513:
511:
505:
504:
499:
495:
491:
487:
483:
479:
475:
471:
468:
467:
464:
460:
456:
452:
451:
450:
449:
446:
443:
442:
437:
436:
431:
430:
427:
422:
416:
408:
406:
402:
398:
393:
391:
387:
383:
379:
378:
374:
368:
364:
360:
355:
350:
345:
341:
337:
333:
332:
331:
330:
327:
323:
319:
315:
311:
310:
305:
304:
303:
302:
298:
294:
285:
282:
281:
275:
273:
269:
264:
261:
257:
252:
247:
244:
240:
236:
231:
226:
224:
218:
216:
215:page analysis
212:
206:
204:
201:
198:
194:
192:
188:
183:
180:
179:
173:
170:
166:
161:
158:
150:
139:
135:
131:
127:
123:
122:
121:
118:
112:
108:
104:
103:
102:
101:
97:
96:
95:
83:
80:
76:
73:
72:
71:
69:
61:
58:
56:
55:
49:
48:
43:
35:
34:
27:
19:
1281:
1272:
1254:
1245:
1222:
1207:The Signpost
1206:
1204:
1178:
1055:
1044:
1041:
1038:
1035:
1032:All the best
1012:
993:
984:
950:
927:
880:Gerda Arendt
865:
836:
824:
823:
797:
792:
653:
652:
633:
547:
542:
538:
520:
485:
440:
435:Dennis Brown
434:
397:TonyBallioni
348:
343:
339:
286:
278:
267:
265:
248:
227:
219:
207:
195:
184:
177:
174:
162:
156:
154:
93:
92:
88:
85:escalations.
65:
32:
31:
29:
25:
1285:scope_creep
1269:Bailing out
1258:scope_creep
1242:Bailing out
1126:this thread
1122:Nosebagbear
1100:started by
1093:Yngvadottir
1073:Yngvadottir
1059:Yngvadottir
1013:Thank you,
951:Thank you,
714:Atlantic306
696:Atlantic306
482:Yngvadottir
280:prima facie
124:Regretful,
82:Arbitration
1225:Smallbones
1162:Iridescent
1114:Iridescent
663:click me!)
638:Farmbrough
567:JarrahTree
521:Retirement
509:Puddleglum
382:--valereee
256:show trial
254:that is a
1231:smalltalk
1154:WP:LEVEL2
1015:ONUnicorn
996:ONUnicorn
722:Barkeep49
272:Jehochman
818:Precious
686:contribs
455:Lectonar
126:Xaosflux
116:xaosflux
1276:Kudpung
1249:Kudpung
825:schools
237:whose
230:Lourdes
91:Dreamy
68:Kudpung
1120:, and
1110:Isaacl
1048:Begoon
893:Danke
849:, for
809:(talk)
587:GRuban
541:be at
470:Dennis
235:GRuban
211:MMORPG
157:issues
111:WP:RFA
78:faith.
62:closed
51:Arbcom
1118:Atsme
895:Gerda
793:Davey
336:Buffs
318:Buffs
314:WP:AN
243:Buffs
185:From
107:WP:BN
16:<
1215:talk
1209:. â
1188:Talk
1135:talk
1106:Xeno
1082:talk
1063:talk
1023:talk
961:talk
940:talk
903:talk
884:talk
868:2351
845:and
798:2010
781:talk
762:L3X1
748:talk
730:talk
720:and
718:ICPH
700:talk
682:talk
635:Rich
624:talk
610:talk
591:talk
575:talk
556:talk
548:will
539:will
529:talk
494:talk
459:talk
420:talk
401:talk
386:talk
363:talk
349:they
322:talk
297:talk
258:and
251:PTSD
134:talk
98:ð·
94:Jazz
1211:Bri
872:QAI
344:way
340:not
40:me!
1217:)
1193:ð§
1137:)
1116:,
1112:,
1108:,
1084:)
1065:)
1045:--
1025:)
1017:.
963:)
955:.
942:)
905:)
897:.
886:)
861:!
841:,
783:)
754:)
750:-
732:)
702:)
688:)
684:âĒ
626:)
612:)
593:)
577:)
558:)
531:)
496:)
488:.
476:.
472:,
461:)
441:2ÂĒ
438:-
403:)
388:)
365:)
324:)
299:)
202:,
199:,
136:)
1278::
1274:@
1251::
1247:@
1234:)
1228:(
1213:(
1133:(
1080:(
1061:(
1021:(
959:(
938:(
901:(
882:(
779:(
746:(
728:(
698:(
680:(
661:(
646:.
622:(
608:(
589:(
573:(
554:(
527:(
492:(
457:(
423:)
417:(
399:(
384:(
361:(
320:(
295:(
132:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.