User talk:Kurt Leyman - Knowledge (XXG)

192:

any Luftwaffe fighter. That sounds correct as the Lancasters were significantly dis-armed (one turret and some armour removed) and, against FW190s, casualties should have been far greater than one, with damage to surviving aircraft. Sources then disagree: some say all aircraft returned safely, some say one was brought down by flak. I would tend to accept the latter as there are also details of a bomber crashing in Sweden. The failure of JG5 at Bardufoss to protect Tirpitz is indisputable: Tirpitz sank. But, why? It appears that the fighter wing had only just been transferred to Bardufoss, as a response to the previous attack on 29th October and crews were still training for their new FW190 aircraft. They were restricted to local defence and emergencies. Again sources differ. Some say that JG5 was not informed in time. Others say that Bardufoss claimed that it was under attack, which would support your source’s claim of a planned diversion. (No sources that I’ve seen say that this was an planned diversion – just misinterpretation.) What then confuses is the statement I’ve seen of Bardufoss' report that there were planes overhead. Another site points to weaknesses in the German air defence system in the area, so this probably contributed. I’ve also seen, but cannot reference, a statement that Luftwaffe commander(s) were court-martialled.

509:. The changes themselves I have no problem with. The problem I have is that it's your usual pattern. You make the change, it's reverted...instead of then opening up a discussion on the talk page, you make the change again. That kind of behavior leads to edit wars. Do others have the same obligation you do? Sure. But what's bothersome with you is that you never do it. Instead you get into revert or edit wars with people with very little discussion about it. It doesn't hurt anything to say "hey, why do you object to this change?" -- 2062: 1989: 1854: 1781: 429:

Then in 1936 Germany agreed to the Anglo-German Naval Treaty which loosened those committments somewhat, although Germany was still bound by restrictions on tonnage of individual ships, and that limited armament to some degree. It is impractical to mount a 15-inch gun on a lightly built ship of limited tonnage without sacrificing other items, usually armour. The former German Navy intel officer

1480:. Please don't revert each other, and accept the outcome of the RfC. This is supposed to be a community work, so sometimes it's necessary to swallow one's personal preferences, accept that things won't always go one's way, and go to work at some other article. (by the way,personally, I have no preference for any of those two images) -- 992:

FDF publications. If you have info to the contrary, please give it. The full reserve strength, on the other hand, is much higher. If you count all the persons who have passed their conscription, and have not fulfilled their 50th or 60th year, you arrive at a number that is somewhere between 830,000 and 950,000. --

1652:

hi Kurt. Could you pls explain the issue regarding the title of alexander as basileus of macedon? we use all the original forms for his titles and not the translations ie hegemon of the hellenic league ( instead of the translation sovereign of the hellenic league, shahashah of persia instead of great

1378:

Kurt, I tried hard to find a scholarly reference for your edit and failed. Instead of it I found two very good references who dismiss the information of HA as popular stereotypes for barbarian bandits or soldiers. So I reverted your edit and put this one. If you could find a reference supporting your

991:

We seem to have rather differing opinions about the Finnish Defence Forces reserve strength. Could you please provide a source for the number you give, 485,000? From 2008 on, the full mobilized strength of the FDF is 350,000, as evindenced by the Finnish government decisions on the matter and several

450:

That seems to fit well with Germany's repudiation in April 1939 of the 1936 Anglo-German Naval Treaty, giving the German Navy the freedom to advance plans for an upgunning, and probably an increase in tonnage. However, WW2 began earlier than the German Navy's plans envisaged, and the rest is history.

1602:

Knowledge (XXG) articles should rely mainly on published reliable secondary sources and, to a lesser extent, on tertiary sources. All interpretive claims, analyses, or synthetic claims about primary sources must be referenced to a secondary source, rather than original analysis of the primary-source

1402:

Hello. I'm sorry, but your explanation doesn't seem to explain anything. How and why has the picture been "superseded" by the other one? To me, the coloration of the bright picture looks more varied and more akin to that of the photographs I have seen in print. (I have not seen the original mosaic.)

857:

I agree that Mibovosky's assessment is too simplistic, making it sound like an isolated war between the two parties of Japan and China resulting in Japan's unconditional surrender. The talk page seems to reflect others sharing the same concern. Surely most people these days still have a peripheral

556:

by the Arbcom a month ago). But honestly, this Potaaatos doesn't have any of Deng's earmarks. But. I did WL the page. If you see anything more Deng like (bad spelling, reversions using words like "liar", etc), let me know. I know that he's lurking somewhere because Deng doesn't just go away. Wish he

270:

had only 22 divisions, six of them with a reserve status: so am I correct in assuming you added the entire strategic reserve, the ten divisions of 6th Army? Also the number of 500,000 you gave, matches the theoretical strength of the 22 divisions (including supply and support forces), not the 32; on

197:

In summary, I still hold to the view that the Luftwaffe failed to protect the Tirpitz – it sank! Given that the sources for no fighter “kills” come from RAF and veteran sources, I would accept them – after all they would know who did and didn’t return. This can only be due to the Luftwaffe not being

1438:

and I never quite understood why. If colours are the issue, I can instead argue that the new picture makes Justinian's face look a pale ash grey instead of a healthy pink, the robe looks anthracite instead of imperial purple and the golden background has lost its splendour and looks like some earth

1182:

Putting a note on your talk page as I'm not looking to start an edit war. While I think the information on the shaven head issue is interesting from a mil-historical standpoint, I don't think it has great bearing on the movie article. What I'm really worried about is it opening the door to all of

1018:

article. I am writing to say that I will probably leave them out even though I can provide a source. The numbers I found were for the British and Commonwealth forces only and, on second look, they do look exceedingly low. In addition, it seems that this is a delicate topic for many and there may

853:

Thanks for your note. Your comments reflect the same thinking I had behind the change; the simple addition of the clause "to the Allies" puts everything in context, bringing everything together, and I believe sums up the result much better. There might be other, better solutions, but it's hard to

573:

was the dead giveaway for me. I don't get it. "Chummy with Kurt". We've heard that before. I've blocked you several times. In fact, I recommended that you be blocked in the post right above his. I sometimes don't like how you operate. But it doesn't excuse Deng's behavior. It never will. Anyway. He

428:

Maybe I can help here. They do appear to have been designed for upgunning. But I hear you asking why go to all the additional hassle and expense of under-gunning when first built. I don't know the answer to that question, but it seems likely that it was related to treaty committments prior to 1936.

372:

I blocked him for a week. Not only was he stalking you, he committed a 3RR vio on Second Battle of the Atlantic. Your edits on that article are not vandalism. In fact, I think they are just as good as what Deng is reverting to. Now, please don't take this to mean that you can do what you want. I'll

191:

Hi! Thanks for your response. I assume we’re talking only about Operation Catechism on 12th November 1944. I’ve been chasing and comparing sources on the net. The following is based upon them. There are some differences (always will be) but what is not disputed is that no RAF bomber was attacked by

838:

article. Whilst not cited there, the number is cited in the main article ('End of day' section). It does look a bit odd that the number of Germans at Omaha is given as 'Unknown', but as far as I can tell, whilst the units defending the beach were known, they were spread across a sector that only

1528:

Oops, didn't know that. I certainly don't think it's all that important, and I admit that it would be childish having an edit war over a picture. I will stop reverting. It's just that I was a little annoyed, I think, by the lack of a clear explanation for that change. I do tend to be a little

891:

Uskoisin (tai ainakin pidän täysin mahdollisena), että viittaus M11/39-miehistöjen innostukseen uudesta panssarivaunustaan on lainattu Nicola Pignaton italiankielisestä kirjasta, joten sen vuoksi kyseisen kohdan poistaminen artikkelista on mielestäni täysin turhaa, ellet varmuudella voi esim.

1317:

Kurt, your recent addition about his height would be more useful if it was supported by a citation to a reliable reference. Anyway, I think I have seen it somewhere, perhaps you would be able to find one in Google books. Otherwise, I think we should revert it (please also check the relevant

1866:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

2001:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

774:, was fitting more. The word "invasion" suggests a large scale operation, not the sub-secondary role played by the Slovak State. It also does not provide context and could be mistaken for any of historical incursions of Poland from Slovakia. It also fits with the commonly used term 96:

I see you are new here so you might not be familiar with Knowledge (XXG) policies. In general, Knowledge (XXG) is very strict about images, and allows the inclusion only of those images which have precise license information that releases them into public use.

1183:

the rest of the 'inaccuracy' additions like the folded sights on the MG42 ad nauseum. We just got that stuff cleared out of the article. If a couple of the regular editors of the article agree with you and disagree with me then I'll go along with consensus.--

271:

the other hand less then 100,000 Italian troops were really at the frontline. So we might even enlarge the number of troops to be consistent; or we could be more realistic and give the numbers of 16 divisions and 300,000 troops. What do you think? Greetings, --

310: 303: 265:

Hi, Kurt! You have of course been correct in adding the Italian involvement in the battle; however mentioning the entire theoretical strength of Army Group West is very deceptive as most of these divisions weren't fully mobilised, let alone deployed. Besides

65:. You then changed it back to a reading just as spurious as the one I changed. Why are you doing this?? If you don't agree with the Board's conclusion - and many people don't - then by all means add a paragraph explaining why it's wrong; but please, please. 1608:

Therefore, it is clearly wrong tactic to use a primary source in order to refute a secondary scholarly view. Therefore, I moved Herodian's claims before the secondary references,in order to emphasize the latter. I also performed a general cleanup of the

1793:

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

1326:) 17:05, 9 January 2009 (UTC) And I just noticed that you based your edit on some user views in the discussion page. Unless these views are backed by a scholarly reference, it's nothing but original research therefore they cannot be used in articles 1418:

I would appreciate it if you could respond to my question in the form of a talk page comment. What is "better colour adjusting" supposed to mean? Is there any underlying policy on account of which that statement should be considered authoritative?

911:. Käy katsomassa jos huvittaa, ja lisää tarvittaessa omia kommenttejasi. Joka tapauksessa en enää itse aio puuttua artikkeliin ennen kuin tuolta taholta tulee vastaus siitä, minkälainen sisältö Wikipedian artikkeleissa on suotavaa. Hyvät joulut. 373:

be monitoring the situation. But I just wanted to let you know. And thanks for the heads up on it. I usually don't watch user's edits, so I wouldn't have known that he was back to what he was doing with you. So. Be good. Please. For me. :) --

622:

This image was added for the reasons I stated on the discussion board, I suggest you look there. As for the 'is that even real' have you never heard of the 'Black 6' its the most famous 109 survivor. In fact it last flew I believe in 2004.

468:

I am very interested in these ships like you. I was just wondering why you removed the images of Scharnhorst and Gneisenau? Do you think there are to many, or you just didn't like them. I think personally that the more pictures the better.

1105:

Person will become emperor (of west or east) only if after taking power he is accepted by other emperor (west or east). If he is not accepted he is usurper. Because of that rule Romulus Augustus has been failed usurper during Julius Nepos

706:

tuolle nimelle siitä Nordostista, ja nyt vasta huomasin, että se oli ollut melkein samanlaisella nimellä aikaisemmin. Ilmeisesti sinä olit vaihtanut sen. Että olikos tämä nyt huono siirto, vaikka eikös se nimi juuri vaihdettu pois tuosta

500:

Hello Kurt. Just some advice. I think you would be much better off by using talk pages to discuss controversial changes you want to make instead of using edit summaries. Talk pages are to discuss changes such as the ones you made to

61:

You seem to have very strong views about what caused the loss of HMS Hood. I recently corrected a false rendering of the 2nd Board of Enquiry's conclusion on the loss, replacing it with a verbatim quotation from the transcript at

235:

Last point: it would have helped if you had left a reason for your deletion at the time. I think that there will be enough common ground to reinstate a version of the deleted text. I’ll continue looking for info. Regards,

1653:

king of persia pharaoh of egypt instead of king of egypt etc). By convension we should use the same as we did thus far. I will revert it back to my own update and pls fell free to adress to me any concerns. All the best

1628:

Hi Kurt! It's nice to see you improving articles such as Charles XI of Sweden. As you seem to have a disagreement with another user, I suggest that you present your views on the discussion page before you revert him.

1557:

Do you have a usable reference for those retail units? I know they exist, but I'm turning up a blank on reliable sources to reference it to. It really needs a reference, or else its probably going to need removing. --

198:

ready, probably due to their recent arrival in the area and their new aircraft, coupled with the wish to defend their own base (but why not airborne?). One source states that the fighters were scambled, but too late.

2107: 2029: 1894: 1821: 607:

I'm fine with amending the phrase to 'some' historians. Perhaps a reference at that point to the Wiki Battle of Britain page would allow users to see the difference between the British and German historians' views.

1234:

I think I finally see what you are trying to say. I found a wording to make everyone happy and is better overall since he is now a member of an entourage and not just someone who is loved or beloved by Hadrian.

1736:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 1514:) 07:43, 15 April 2009 (UTC) P.D.: I removed unnecessary harsh wording from my post, sorry for my uncivility, it's just a common wording used in very informal message boards but I shouldn't have used it here -- 931:

I have opened an RfC on whether to refer to these ships as battleships or battlecruisers. Since you have participated in this debate previously, please have a look, read the debate, and make your views known:

1100:

I am not weird historian or something similar because if you look history you need to look state laws and documents without POV thinking. Example for Western Roman Empire. Evidence against Romulus Augustus:

180:

Please explain your deletion of info from this article. Do you regard it as untrue or as irrelevant? An answer to my query, above, about your deletions from Battle of the Denmark Strait would be courteous.

858:

knowledge of the second world war, but the summary box taken on its own without the clause could certainly be confusing. I will keep an eye on the article in case Mibovosky or others take issue with it. —

538:

If he reverts again, just let him. I am up to 2 reverts. I'll change it back later. I do get the feeling that some people think that Poland and Canada were the only participants in WW2. Very strange.

2091:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 2013:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 1878:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 1805:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 331:. Some users at that page seem way to willing to erase any mentions of misconduct on the part of Soviet partisants, however they can be stopped with the use of proper, academic references - see 1433:

Alright. So it's a matter of colour adjustment and of increasing/decreasing brightness. The other picture, which had been there since August 21, 2003, was replaced by a bot on July 10, 2007,

670:, "didn't the Germans suffer one dead?". The answer is "not during the battle itself". The first German fatality occured later in the same day, during the attack by torpedo bombers from HMS 2076: 1462:, and indeed in the Justinian image. The range of colours seems quite poor, and I would rather trust the other photograph regarding accuracy of coloration. Therefore I have restored it. 1439:

colour, while it is exactly the splendour that is such a recurring theme in descriptions of Byzantine art. Hence I would say that the older picture is more fitting than the new one.

446:

published 1974 in English by Hamlyn) that the German Navy were planning for a war with Great Britain that was unlikely to begin before 1944 (page 34). He also writes (page 38) that

1632:

Note that I don't have any opinion either way -- I only noticed that you were making an argument in the page history when you reverted, which is a difficult place for discussions.

1349:

it makes sense), at any rate. Anyway, I 'll try myself to find a reference. Don't forget that I am the one who has found the correct medical reference on his assumed acromegaly.

404:

The only sources that I have seen to say anything about the claim of the ships being built to carry 15 inch guns from the beginning are internet sources. Can you provide books?

1046:

is raising some valid points about the positioning of the Battle of Halbe, and as you had access to the other major source that we used to write the article (Tony Le Tissier,

28:, and please provide the license for those pics. Also, if you add a new pic to an article, there's no need to delete the previous ones (just take a note on how the article on 1699: 1674:

I'm sorry for bothering you, but since I noticed in the past your interest regarding the Eastern Roman/Byzantine Empire, I thought you might want to know that there is a

591:

Yeah it's Deng. I brought it up as a possibility to DMorpheus a week or so ago but he wasn't sure. Well. If you look at his talk page, he's sure now. I'll block him. --

711:

tuohon Suomalainen Waffen-SS-vapaaehtoispataljoona? Kieltämättä tuo uudempi on hieman huono joissain yhteyksissä, kuten "German Finnish Volunteer battalion" jne.. --

1097:

During his time Napoleon has been speaking that it is not important what he is doing, because history writes will say what they want and this will become history.

1694:

because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the

291:

In 1943 the Peruvian navy destroyed a German submarine that had arrived to the port of Callao to get supplies. Peru also sunk another German battleship in 1944.

778:

and typically used Czech and Slovak terms ("invasion" would sound absurd in these because of possibly shifted semantics of the word in these two languages).

703: 1458:

Self correction: probably not, but the colours look strangely undifferentiated, as in pre-1970s art reproductions. This is exemplified by an image such as

686:. I have taken the liberty of reversing the change. Please advise me if you have any problem with this (I have added this page to my watchlist). Regards, 1083:

Byzantine/Roman Empire has not died with Constantine XI. Many users are forgeting that Byzantine Empire has existed next 7 or 8 years (Byzantine province

1198:

OK. I've made some (what I consider) minor changes to your addition in an attempt to tie it in to the rest of the section. I hope you're OK with them.--

354:

Oletko suomalainen? Meillä näyttää olevan samoja mielenkiinnon kohteita, ja eräät täällä näyttävät muokkaavan asioita aina Neuvostoliiton hyödyksi.

1675: 1090:

Last direct piece of unbroken line of Roman Empire has died only in 1476 .This fact has been public knowledge for very long time (around 300 years).

839:

partially included Omaha, so it's not so easy simply to state unit strength as the defensive strength (and of course be able to cite it). Cheers. --

1116:

Because of this 3 simple reasons Julius Nepos has been last Western Roman Emperor and Romulus Augustus nothing more but last Roman ruler of Italy.

128:

BTW on talk pages you can sign you comments with ~~~~. Knowledge (XXG) will automagically put in your user name and a time stamp when you save it.

251:

Saw your comment about conspiracy theories -- lurk around those pages for awhile, you won't believe how many people actually believe that crud.

1593:

Hello Kurt! Primary sources (Herodian) are not suitable for supporting debated claims (Maximinus' height). Please read carefully this one from

1080:

Maybe I am mistaking but there is only 1 historical source that he has been crowned in Mistra and it is ease to put this source under question.

121:

I have moved the debate about class to a central page which did not exist when the debate started. Perhapse you would like to comment further.

443: 2130: 2043: 1908: 1835: 1761: 1138:

Very well, but next time make sure you write a better worded summary. I see that the issue is that a link to its own article is pointless.

1015: 933: 1950:

Hi There, thanks for your contributions. Please remember to start a discussion thread before making controversial moves like you made on

907:

Laitoin aiheesta kysymyksen tuon WikiProjekti Sotahistorian (jonka piiriin väittelyn kohteena oleva artikkeli kuuluu) pääkoordinaattorin

1668: 1112:

After Odoacer has taken power he has accepted fact that Julius Nepos is Western Roman Emperor and has even issued coins in Nepos' name.

115: 1691: 1506:. The stability of the article is more important than getting the "right" image on it. (this is directed to both Kurt and Iblardi) -- 1499: 408:

The stuff I have at home is lightweight but supports the belief that this class were designed for up-gunning. My copy of the Collins

358:

lisäsin niitä lähteitä, ja nyt se näyttää olevan jo niskan päällä. Laitoin sen hautakiven kuvan Commonsiin ja lisäsin artikkeliin. --

1153: 822: 1594: 1109:

Romulus Augustus has not even been recognized in Dalmatia and northern Gaul which has been last 2 Roman provinces (without Italy).

136: 37: 2126: 2039: 1904: 1831: 1757: 2100: 2022: 1887: 1814: 1365: 1059: 771: 552:

Well I took a look. Honestly, my first thought was the troublesome editor you were talking about (whose indefinite block was

1342: 293:

I've found NO evidence for anything like this, even allowing that "battleship" might mean "warship". Have you any evidence?

1251: 1271:. Can you pass by that and explain your rationale for using the bust image on the infobox instead of the mosaic image? -- 667: 1748:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to

313:. All this is is ramblings/blog/rants about Bush. Not encyclopedic, should've been deleted long ago. Happy editing! 2112: 2034: 1899: 1826: 1753: 1294:. Please see my comment above, there are four editors (including me) that think that the mosaic looks better, I don't 678:

threw a petty officer against a bulkhead, causing fatal head injuries. This is confirmed in sources such as Kennedy's

965:

article. Please try to discuss the issues on talk. I'm close to protecting the article, and it will certainly be on

1695: 1687: 1459: 332: 1055: 876:

was the edit summary to which I was referring. It's wrong to label edits as vandalism when they clearly are not.

762: 335:. I'd strongly recommend that using references is the best way to ensure your information stays in the article.-- 143: 129: 122: 101: 29: 799:

First, I'm not pro PRL it was rubbish from the very beginning until it's deserved end. Second how do I mark the

1951: 1291: 1268: 974: 908: 416:. Why the down on web sources? Some are just as reliable as some books. Hard copy doesn't guarantee hard fact. 63: 2088: 2010: 1875: 1802: 785:(it needs an admin). I won't - I am low on time and try not engage with bureaucracy and single-side actions. 502: 1676:

request for renaming the article "History of the Eastern Roman Empire" to "History of the Byzantine Empire"

1353: 1239: 810: 166:

are more debatable, but a thumbnail of the aftermath puts the rest into perspective, IMHO. Your comments?

107:

Personally, I find this policy a bit silly when applied to images over 60 years old, but it is what it is.

1093:

Similar problems are created by historians in last years of Western Roman Empire but we can't do anything.

997: 609: 452: 314: 252: 1749: 1967: 1936: 1519: 1511: 1485: 1303: 1276: 818: 289:, the history section states that the Peruvians destroyed a German submarine and a German "battleship": 916: 897: 104:

appears to be copyrighted (look at the bottom), so you cannot just use the images without permission.

25: 17: 1051: 1027: 892:

mainitun kirjan perusteella todistaa, että kyse todellakin on pelkästä arvailusta tai mielipiteestä.

803:

that fought along the Red Army on the eastern front in many battles between 1943 and 1945 (including

786: 213: 2070: 1997: 1862: 1789: 1771: 1725: 1716: 1961: 1658: 1217: 1203: 1188: 970: 687: 83: 2084: 2006: 1871: 1798: 1745: 1729: 1614: 1384: 1361: 1331: 1323: 1143: 941: 228: 154:

You deleted some small parts of this article as "irrelevant". I don't agree. The reasons for the

47: 1534: 1467: 1444: 1424: 1408: 1247: 1124: 993: 804: 440: 417: 339: 294: 237: 208: 182: 167: 21: 2096: 2018: 1883: 1810: 1741: 1733: 1502:, so please err, I mean, stop reverting each other and let the RfC run for 30 days and then 327:

It would be great if you can provide a source for this. Without that, it is much more likely

2119: 1932: 1639: 1515: 1507: 1481: 1477: 1454:

Am I right to understand that this is all older material of which the copyright has expired,

1299: 1272: 966: 958: 814: 751: 733: 644: 592: 575: 558: 522: 510: 386: 374: 355: 2099:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2092: 2021:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2014: 1886:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 1879: 1813:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 1806: 1744:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 1737: 1341:

Hi Kurt! At the heart of my reservation is that we should not add material that is akin to

912: 893: 311:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Rationales to impeach George W. Bush (2nd nomination)

304:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Rationales to impeach George W. Bush (2nd nomination)

1578: 1563: 1037: 1023: 962: 951: 934:

Talk:Scharnhorst_class_battlecruiser#Request_for_Comment:_Battleships_or_Battlecruisers.3F

775: 716: 626: 1955: 1456: 1073:

Seeing "actions" in Constantine XI article I am writing my comments on users talk pages.

782: 1929: 1654: 1213: 1199: 1184: 1164: 877: 860: 737: 1610: 1380: 1357: 1327: 1319: 1139: 937: 840: 44: 1529:

uncooperative lately. It might be time to take a Wikibreak. Thanks for the comment.

1307: 1530: 1463: 1440: 1420: 1404: 1243: 1120: 1043: 866: 336: 218: 2061: 1988: 1853: 1780: 385:

Btw, please don't "discuss" via edit summaries. That's what talk pages are for. --

834:

Hi there. I've re-edited the German casualty figure back into the infobox in the

1635: 835: 630: 539: 470: 158:

not being pursued, if true, seem relevant. The other bits about the fate of the

108: 1703: 1574: 1559: 712: 359: 223: 1396: 1160: 506: 272: 2134: 2047: 1976: 1940: 1912: 1839: 1765: 1710: 1662: 1642: 1618: 1582: 1567: 1538: 1523: 1489: 1471: 1448: 1428: 1412: 1388: 1369: 1335: 1280: 1255: 1221: 1207: 1192: 1168: 1147: 1128: 1063: 1031: 1001: 978: 945: 920: 901: 880: 843: 789: 756: 740: 722: 690: 649: 633: 612: 597: 580: 563: 542: 527: 515: 473: 455: 420: 391: 379: 362: 341: 317: 297: 275: 255: 240: 185: 170: 86: 1925: 1119:

My point is that about end of Roman Empire we can't trust historians :)--

2103:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

2025:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

1890:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

1817:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

643:

I'm not 100% convinced it's Deng. But I'm watching his edits closely. --

2080:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

1732:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge (XXG)

732:

Hi Kurt, a user (Elrith) is doing some major changes and deletions on

736:

please review these changes since you are familiar with the subject.

1930:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/Talk:Rajneesh#Requested_move_11_June_2018

557:

would but it doesn't work that way with him. So. Keep me posted. --

72:

I would be very grateful if you would put a message, either on the

1159:

Could you kindly look at this article as it needs attention. FWiW

1084: 214:

http://www.bismarck-class.dk/tirpitz/history/tiropercatechism.html

750:

I blocked him. Almost certainly Deng. Thanks for the heads up. --

2116:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 286: 2106:

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

2074:

is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All

2028:

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review

1893:

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review

1820:

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review

1050:), perhaps you would like to contribute to the conversation on 800: 781:

If you get convinced by this you may request the move back on

448:"the latter and to be rearmed in 1941-42 with 15-inch guns." 229:

http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/overlander/attack.htm

76:

talk page or on mine, explaining the reason for your changes.

40:

and deleted the interwiki link from the respective article?

209:

http://groups.msn.com/BritishNavy/sinkingofthetirpitz.msnw

1702:

if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you.

1496:

edit warring can get an article dropped from GA/FA status

1022:

In other words, I agree with your removal. Best wishes!

1019:

never be a totally reliable source for acurrate numbers.

1403:

The current one looks rather as if it was underexposed.

854:

be much more brief and still get the detail in there.

2087:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the

2009:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the

1874:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the

1801:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the

1436: 1434: 873: 768: 663: 570: 553: 328: 33: 36:. Finally, why did you delete the description for the 1504:

abide for what the RfC says even if you don't like it

142:

Please can you add a source for the quote you added.

1698:. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at 1678:. However, there's no problem if you're too busy. 1724:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current 1379:edit, I would be glad to embed it in the article 1077:Constantine XI is last emperor of Constantinople 655:Battle of the Denmark Strait - German casualties 219:http://www.raf.mod.uk/bombercommand/tirpitz.html 412:which is an extract from Jane's says they were 414:quite capable of up-gunning to 15-in mountings 1928:. Would you be interested in participating? 1924:There is a Page move discussion going on for 1682:Possibly unfree File:Soviet child soldier.jpg 521:Could you *please* start using talk pages? -- 8: 1595:WP:OR:Primary,secondary and tertiary sources 957:You seem to be caught in an revert war with 704:Finnish Volunteer Battalion of the Waffen-SS 203:Here are the main on-line sources I've used: 1958:to know more on how to do this. regards. -- 38:Image:Schlezwig after skirmish with Hel.jpg 1052:Talk:Battle of Halbe#Spree Forest and Mark 224:http://www.lancastermuseum.ca/tirpitz.html 485:These accusitions are very sceptic. Kurt. 43:Please reply on my talk page. Thank you. 261:Italian involvement in Battle of France 69:do not misrepresent a primary source. 1692:Knowledge (XXG):Possibly unfree files 1686:A file that you uploaded or altered, 1500:Knowledge (XXG):Good article criteria 662:You ask, in the edit summary of your 337:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 7: 2071:2022 Arbitration Committee elections 1998:2018 Arbitration Committee elections 1863:2017 Arbitration Committee elections 1790:2016 Arbitration Committee elections 1603:material by Knowledge (XXG) editors. 1269:Talk:Alexander_the_Great#First_Image 1016:East African Campaign (World War II) 1014:I put the casualty figures into the 1010:East African Campaign (World War II) 770:I would say that the original name, 2089:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process 2055:ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message 2011:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process 1876:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process 1803:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process 1669:History of the Eastern Roman Empire 1995:Hello, Kurt Leyman. Voting in the 1982:ArbCom 2018 election voter message 1860:Hello, Kurt Leyman. Voting in the 1847:ArbCom 2017 election voter message 1787:Hello, Kurt Leyman. Voting in the 909:Kirill Lokshinin keskustelusivulle 116:Talk:Gneisenau class battlecruiser 14: 1750:review the candidates' statements 1154:Aircraft of the Battle of Britain 849:Second Sino-Japanese War's result 2060: 1987: 1852: 1779: 1292:RfC on the matter of the picture 674:; the shock of a torpedo hit on 137:German battlecruiser Scharnhorst 2110:and submit your choices on the 2032:and submit your choices on the 1897:and submit your choices on the 1267:Hi, there is a consultation at 872:Hey, I'm not arguing with you. 32:looks now and how it did after 1756:. For the Election committee, 1726:Arbitration Committee election 1717:ArbCom elections are now open! 881:23:26, 18 September 2007 (UTC) 867:06:29, 16 September 2007 (UTC) 825:) 19:48, August 27, 2007 (UTC) 772:Polish Campaign of Slovak Army 285:If you look at the article on 1: 2135:00:20, 29 November 2022 (UTC) 2048:18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC) 1840:22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC) 1766:13:05, 23 November 2015 (UTC) 1711:01:43, 13 November 2015 (UTC) 1688:File:Soviet child soldier.jpg 1619:17:59, 9 September 2009 (UTC) 1308:23:40, 20 December 2008 (UTC) 1298:to define "looks better". -- 921:15:43, 23 December 2007 (UTC) 902:15:37, 22 December 2007 (UTC) 581:01:34, 20 February 2007 (UTC) 564:15:44, 19 February 2007 (UTC) 276:18:24, 26 February 2006 (UTC) 256:10:02, 26 February 2006 (UTC) 241:11:32, 24 February 2006 (UTC) 186:23:56, 10 February 2006 (UTC) 1977:11:01, 20 October 2018 (UTC) 1913:18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC) 1643:19:59, 21 October 2009 (UTC) 1478:RfC about which image to use 1389:11:23, 10 January 2009 (UTC) 1370:09:51, 10 January 2009 (UTC) 1281:15:06, 4 December 2008 (UTC) 1256:14:23, 10 October 2008 (UTC) 1032:01:22, 31 January 2008 (UTC) 1002:12:36, 23 January 2008 (UTC) 979:09:13, 22 January 2008 (UTC) 946:18:50, 12 January 2008 (UTC) 668:Battle of the Denmark Strait 456:13:34, 30 January 2007 (UTC) 171:18:36, 21 January 2006 (UTC) 150:Battle of the Denmark Strait 1824:and submit your choices on 1752:and submit your choices on 1663:13:27, 5 January 2010 (UTC) 1336:20:30, 9 January 2009 (UTC) 927:Scharnhorst & Gneisenau 844:15:57, 31 August 2007 (UTC) 790:19:54, 19 August 2007 (UTC) 682:and Mullenheim-Rechsberg's 574:has been blocked. Again. -- 543:22:44, 26 August 2006 (UTC) 323:Soviet partisans in Finland 309:You are invited to vote at 2153: 2127:MediaWiki message delivery 2040:MediaWiki message delivery 1905:MediaWiki message delivery 1832:MediaWiki message delivery 1822:the candidates' statements 1758:MediaWiki message delivery 1583:21:47, 28 March 2009 (UTC) 1568:21:27, 28 March 2009 (UTC) 1539:10:12, 15 April 2009 (UTC) 1524:11:55, 15 April 2009 (UTC) 1490:07:36, 15 April 2009 (UTC) 1449:13:47, 28 March 2009 (UTC) 1429:10:40, 28 March 2009 (UTC) 1413:20:24, 25 March 2009 (UTC) 1286:RfC on Alexander's picture 613:11:31, 19 April 2007 (UTC) 598:02:30, 16 April 2007 (UTC) 333:Soviet partisans in Poland 298:10:33, 13 March 2006 (UTC) 87:18:01, 24 March 2006 (UTC) 1954:. Please see the page at 1941:07:03, 15 June 2018 (UTC) 1472:22:37, 8 April 2009 (UTC) 1222:01:25, 30 July 2008 (UTC) 1208:20:25, 29 July 2008 (UTC) 1193:02:09, 29 July 2008 (UTC) 1169:13:43, 20 July 2008 (UTC) 1064:07:13, 8 April 2008 (UTC) 763:Slovak invasion of Poland 757:05:26, 20 July 2007 (UTC) 741:02:48, 18 June 2007 (UTC) 528:06:07, 19 July 2006 (UTC) 474:22:28, 10 June 2006 (UTC) 329:that you will be reverted 146:30 June 2005 10:10 (UTC) 132:09:23, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC) 125:09:20, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC) 92:Images on Knowledge (XXG) 50:11:08, Jun 4, 2005 (UTC) 30:German battleship Tirpitz 2124:to your user talk page. 1952:Death of Jamal Khashoggi 1946:Controversial Page moves 1148:17:50, 7 July 2008 (UTC) 984:Finnish reserve strength 723:10:41, 20 May 2007 (UTC) 516:10:42, 8 July 2006 (UTC) 421:21:58, 2 June 2006 (UTC) 410:Warships of World War II 392:22:37, 2 June 2006 (UTC) 380:14:15, 2 June 2006 (UTC) 363:20:34, 27 May 2006 (UTC) 342:22:03, 22 May 2006 (UTC) 111:17:58, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC) 1573:They'll have to do. -- 1553:Empire: Total War units 1345:(e.g. when adding what 1285: 1129:11:50, 2 May 2008 (UTC) 691:14:12, 8 May 2007 (UTC) 650:03:01, 7 May 2007 (UTC) 634:00:07, 6 May 2007 (UTC) 436:The German Navy 1939-45 318:21:47, 3 May 2006 (UTC) 1605: 848: 82:John Moore London, UK 2085:Arbitration Committee 2068:Hello! Voting in the 2007:Arbitration Committee 1872:Arbitration Committee 1799:Arbitration Committee 1772:ArbCom Elections 2016 1730:Arbitration Committee 1696:file description page 1690:, has been listed at 1600: 1589:Maximinus Thrax again 795:LWP on eastern front. 268:Gruppo d'Armate Ovest 1920:Page move discussion 1624:Charles XI of Sweden 1343:WP:Original Research 1056:Philip Baird Shearer 603:corpo aereo italiano 548:Battle of Stalingrad 503:Battle of Königsberg 247:Tin-Foil Hat Brigade 144:Philip Baird Shearer 130:Philip Baird Shearer 123:Philip Baird Shearer 1734:arbitration process 1175:Saving Private Ryan 967:m:The Wrong Version 684:Battleship Bismarck 281:Peru v Kriegsmarine 2101:arbitration policy 2023:arbitration policy 1888:arbitration policy 1815:arbitration policy 1774:: Voting now open! 1746:arbitration policy 1318:discussion page). 1048:Slaughter at Halbe 100:For example, this 22:Image:Bismarck.jpg 2137: 1373: 1356:comment added by 1290:Well, I opened a 1259: 1242:comment added by 826: 813:comment added by 805:Battle for Berlin 610:Christopher Bryan 534:Rex and the Poles 453:George.Hutchinson 315:Morton devonshire 253:Morton devonshire 26:Image:Bastico.jpg 18:Image:Tirpitz.jpg 2144: 2125: 2123: 2064: 1991: 1974: 1971: 1965: 1856: 1783: 1708: 1372: 1350: 1263:image on infobox 1258: 1236: 959:User:R. A. Hicks 863: 808: 734:Continuation war 728:Continuation war 356:Soviet partisans 54:Loss of HMS Hood 2152: 2151: 2147: 2146: 2145: 2143: 2142: 2141: 2140: 2139: 2117: 2065: 2057: 2052: 2051: 1992: 1984: 1969: 1963: 1960: 1948: 1922: 1917: 1916: 1857: 1849: 1844: 1843: 1827:the voting page 1784: 1776: 1754:the voting page 1720: 1704: 1684: 1672: 1650: 1626: 1591: 1555: 1498:per point 5 of 1400: 1351: 1315: 1313:Maximinus Thrax 1288: 1265: 1237: 1232: 1177: 1157: 1136: 1134:Byzantine Empie 1071: 1041: 1038:Battle of Halbe 1012: 986: 963:Battle of Crete 955: 952:Battle of Crete 929: 889: 861: 851: 832: 797: 787:Pavel Vozenilek 776:Polish Campaign 766: 748: 730: 700: 657: 641: 620: 605: 589: 550: 536: 498: 466: 400: 370: 352: 325: 307: 283: 263: 249: 178: 152: 140: 119: 94: 56: 16:Take a look at 12: 11: 5: 2150: 2148: 2108:the candidates 2077:eligible users 2066: 2059: 2058: 2056: 2053: 2030:the candidates 1993: 1986: 1985: 1983: 1980: 1947: 1944: 1921: 1918: 1895:the candidates 1858: 1851: 1850: 1848: 1845: 1785: 1778: 1777: 1775: 1769: 1723: 1719: 1714: 1700:the discussion 1683: 1680: 1671: 1666: 1649: 1646: 1625: 1622: 1590: 1587: 1586: 1585: 1554: 1551: 1550: 1549: 1548: 1547: 1546: 1545: 1544: 1543: 1542: 1541: 1492: 1399: 1393: 1392: 1391: 1375: 1374: 1314: 1311: 1287: 1284: 1264: 1261: 1231: 1228: 1227: 1226: 1225: 1224: 1176: 1173: 1156: 1151: 1135: 1132: 1114: 1113: 1110: 1107: 1095: 1094: 1091: 1088: 1081: 1078: 1070: 1069:Constantine XI 1067: 1040: 1035: 1011: 1008: 1006: 985: 982: 971:Stephan Schulz 954: 949: 928: 925: 924: 923: 888: 887:Fiat M11/39stä 885: 884: 883: 850: 847: 831: 828: 796: 793: 765: 760: 747: 746:User:Citylaugh 744: 729: 726: 702:Vaihdoin tuon 699: 694: 688:John Moore 309 656: 653: 640: 637: 619: 616: 604: 601: 588: 585: 584: 583: 549: 546: 535: 532: 531: 530: 497: 494: 493: 492: 491: 490: 489: 488: 487: 486: 465: 462: 461: 460: 459: 458: 399: 396: 395: 394: 369: 366: 351: 348: 346: 324: 321: 306: 301: 282: 279: 262: 259: 248: 245: 244: 243: 232: 231: 226: 221: 216: 211: 205: 204: 200: 199: 194: 193: 177: 174: 151: 148: 139: 134: 118: 113: 93: 90: 84:John Moore 309 55: 52: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2149: 2138: 2136: 2132: 2128: 2121: 2115: 2114: 2109: 2104: 2102: 2098: 2094: 2090: 2086: 2081: 2079: 2078: 2073: 2072: 2063: 2054: 2050: 2049: 2045: 2041: 2037: 2036: 2031: 2026: 2024: 2020: 2016: 2012: 2008: 2003: 2000: 1999: 1990: 1981: 1979: 1978: 1975: 1973: 1966: 1957: 1953: 1945: 1943: 1942: 1938: 1934: 1931: 1927: 1919: 1915: 1914: 1910: 1906: 1902: 1901: 1896: 1891: 1889: 1885: 1881: 1877: 1873: 1868: 1865: 1864: 1855: 1846: 1842: 1841: 1837: 1833: 1829: 1828: 1823: 1818: 1816: 1812: 1808: 1804: 1800: 1795: 1792: 1791: 1782: 1773: 1770: 1768: 1767: 1763: 1759: 1755: 1751: 1747: 1743: 1739: 1735: 1731: 1727: 1718: 1715: 1713: 1712: 1709: 1707: 1701: 1697: 1693: 1689: 1681: 1679: 1677: 1670: 1667: 1665: 1664: 1660: 1656: 1647: 1645: 1644: 1641: 1637: 1633: 1630: 1623: 1621: 1620: 1616: 1612: 1606: 1604: 1598: 1596: 1588: 1584: 1580: 1576: 1572: 1571: 1570: 1569: 1565: 1561: 1552: 1540: 1536: 1532: 1527: 1526: 1525: 1521: 1517: 1513: 1509: 1505: 1501: 1497: 1493: 1491: 1487: 1483: 1479: 1475: 1474: 1473: 1469: 1465: 1461: 1457: 1455: 1452: 1451: 1450: 1446: 1442: 1437: 1435: 1432: 1431: 1430: 1426: 1422: 1417: 1416: 1415: 1414: 1410: 1406: 1398: 1394: 1390: 1386: 1382: 1377: 1376: 1371: 1367: 1363: 1359: 1355: 1348: 1344: 1340: 1339: 1338: 1337: 1333: 1329: 1325: 1321: 1312: 1310: 1309: 1305: 1301: 1297: 1293: 1283: 1282: 1278: 1274: 1270: 1262: 1260: 1257: 1253: 1249: 1245: 1241: 1229: 1223: 1219: 1215: 1211: 1210: 1209: 1205: 1201: 1197: 1196: 1195: 1194: 1190: 1186: 1180: 1174: 1172: 1170: 1166: 1162: 1155: 1152: 1150: 1149: 1145: 1141: 1133: 1131: 1130: 1126: 1122: 1117: 1111: 1108: 1104: 1103: 1102: 1098: 1092: 1089: 1086: 1082: 1079: 1076: 1075: 1074: 1068: 1066: 1065: 1061: 1057: 1053: 1049: 1045: 1039: 1036: 1034: 1033: 1029: 1025: 1020: 1017: 1009: 1007: 1004: 1003: 999: 995: 989: 983: 981: 980: 976: 972: 968: 964: 960: 953: 950: 948: 947: 943: 939: 935: 926: 922: 918: 914: 910: 906: 905: 904: 903: 899: 895: 886: 882: 879: 875: 871: 870: 869: 868: 865: 864: 855: 846: 845: 842: 837: 829: 827: 824: 820: 816: 812: 806: 802: 794: 792: 791: 788: 784: 779: 777: 773: 769: 764: 761: 759: 758: 755: 754: 745: 743: 742: 739: 735: 727: 725: 724: 720: 719: 714: 710: 709:pohjoisidästä 705: 698: 695: 693: 692: 689: 685: 681: 677: 673: 669: 665: 660: 659:Hello, Kurt. 654: 652: 651: 648: 647: 638: 636: 635: 632: 628: 627: 624: 617: 615: 614: 611: 602: 600: 599: 596: 595: 586: 582: 579: 578: 572: 568: 567: 566: 565: 562: 561: 555: 547: 545: 544: 541: 533: 529: 526: 525: 520: 519: 518: 517: 514: 513: 508: 504: 495: 484: 483: 482: 481: 480: 479: 478: 477: 476: 475: 472: 463: 457: 454: 449: 445: 444:1 85152 591 2 442: 438: 437: 432: 427: 426: 425: 424: 423: 422: 419: 415: 411: 406: 405: 397: 393: 390: 389: 384: 383: 382: 381: 378: 377: 367: 365: 364: 361: 357: 349: 347: 344: 343: 340: 338: 334: 330: 322: 320: 319: 316: 312: 305: 302: 300: 299: 296: 292: 288: 280: 278: 277: 274: 269: 260: 258: 257: 254: 246: 242: 239: 234: 233: 230: 227: 225: 222: 220: 217: 215: 212: 210: 207: 206: 202: 201: 196: 195: 190: 189: 188: 187: 184: 175: 173: 172: 169: 165: 161: 157: 149: 147: 145: 138: 135: 133: 131: 126: 124: 117: 114: 112: 110: 105: 103: 98: 91: 89: 88: 85: 80: 77: 75: 70: 68: 64: 59: 53: 51: 49: 46: 41: 39: 35: 31: 27: 23: 19: 2111: 2105: 2082: 2075: 2069: 2067: 2033: 2027: 2004: 1996: 1994: 1959: 1949: 1923: 1898: 1892: 1869: 1861: 1859: 1825: 1819: 1796: 1788: 1786: 1721: 1705: 1685: 1673: 1651: 1634: 1631: 1627: 1607: 1601: 1599: 1592: 1556: 1503: 1495: 1494:By the way, 1453: 1401: 1346: 1316: 1295: 1289: 1266: 1233: 1181: 1178: 1158: 1137: 1118: 1115: 1099: 1096: 1072: 1047: 1044:User:KapHorn 1042: 1021: 1013: 1005: 994:MPorciusCato 990: 987: 956: 930: 890: 859: 856: 852: 833: 798: 780: 767: 752: 749: 731: 717: 708: 701: 696: 683: 679: 675: 671: 661: 658: 645: 642: 629: 625: 621: 606: 593: 590: 576: 559: 551: 537: 523: 511: 499: 467: 447: 435: 434: 431:Cajus Becker 430: 418:Folks at 137 413: 409: 407: 403: 401: 387: 375: 371: 353: 345: 326: 308: 295:Folks at 137 290: 284: 267: 264: 250: 238:Folks at 137 183:Folks at 137 179: 168:Folks at 137 163: 159: 155: 153: 141: 127: 120: 106: 99: 95: 81: 78: 73: 71: 66: 60: 57: 42: 15: 2113:voting page 2035:voting page 1933:Accesscrawl 1900:voting page 1516:Enric Naval 1508:Enric Naval 1482:Enric Naval 1476:I opened a 1352:—Preceding 1300:Enric Naval 1273:Enric Naval 1238:—Preceding 836:Omaha Beach 830:Omaha Beach 815:SuperTank17 809:—Preceding 753:Woohookitty 664:latest edit 646:Woohookitty 618:109 Picture 594:Woohookitty 577:Woohookitty 569:It's Deng. 560:Woohookitty 524:Woohookitty 512:Woohookitty 402:You asked: 388:Woohookitty 376:Woohookitty 164:Prinz Eugen 2097:topic bans 2019:topic bans 1884:topic bans 1811:topic bans 1742:topic bans 1609:section.-- 1024:Mkpumphrey 672:Victorious 639:Neverlose1 34:your edits 2093:site bans 2015:site bans 1880:site bans 1807:site bans 1738:site bans 1655:Melathron 1397:Justinian 1395:Image at 1214:Lepeu1999 1212:Me too.-- 1200:Lepeu1999 1185:Lepeu1999 961:over the 936:Regards, 878:Parsecboy 862:LactoseTI 738:Recesende 587:Speaksure 571:This edit 507:Kronstadt 433:wrote in 398:Gneisenau 350:Greetings 79:Regards, 1926:Rajneesh 1648:basileus 1611:Dipa1965 1381:Dipa1965 1366:contribs 1358:Dipa1965 1354:unsigned 1347:we think 1328:Dipa1965 1320:Dipa1965 1252:contribs 1240:unsigned 1140:Tourskin 938:The Land 841:FactotEm 823:contribs 811:unsigned 676:Bismarck 554:endorsed 160:Bismarck 2120:NoACEMM 1531:Iblardi 1464:Iblardi 1441:Iblardi 1421:Iblardi 1405:Iblardi 1244:Geriech 1121:Rjecina 988:Hello! 697:Nordost 680:Pursuit 464:Hi Kurt 176:Tirpitz 1728:. The 1179:Kurt, 1106:reign. 631:Dapi89 540:Wallie 496:Advice 471:Wallie 109:Balcer 67:please 58:Kurt, 45:Halibu 1956:WP:RM 1706:Kelly 1575:Sabre 1560:Sabre 1085:Morea 913:Läyhä 894:Läyhä 783:WP:RM 713:Pudeo 360:Pudeo 2131:talk 2083:The 2044:talk 2005:The 1937:talk 1909:talk 1870:The 1836:talk 1797:The 1762:talk 1659:talk 1636:Fred 1615:talk 1579:talk 1564:talk 1535:talk 1520:talk 1512:talk 1486:talk 1468:talk 1460:this 1445:talk 1425:talk 1409:talk 1385:talk 1362:talk 1332:talk 1324:talk 1304:talk 1296:need 1277:talk 1248:talk 1218:talk 1204:talk 1189:talk 1165:talk 1161:Bzuk 1144:talk 1125:talk 1060:talk 1028:talk 998:talk 975:talk 969:. -- 942:talk 917:talk 898:talk 874:This 819:talk 807:)? 718:Talk 505:and 441:ISBN 368:Deng 287:Peru 273:MWAK 162:and 102:page 74:Hood 24:and 1970:ray 1964:Big 1722:Hi, 801:LWP 666:to 156:PoW 2133:) 2122:}} 2118:{{ 2095:, 2046:) 2038:. 2017:, 1939:) 1911:) 1903:. 1882:, 1838:) 1830:. 1809:, 1764:) 1740:, 1661:) 1617:) 1597:: 1581:) 1566:) 1537:) 1522:) 1488:) 1470:) 1447:) 1427:) 1411:) 1387:) 1368:) 1364:• 1334:) 1306:) 1279:) 1254:) 1250:• 1230:Hi 1220:) 1206:) 1191:) 1171:. 1167:) 1146:) 1127:) 1087:). 1062:) 1054:-- 1030:) 1000:) 977:) 944:) 919:) 900:) 821:• 721:) 608:-- 48:tt 20:, 2129:( 2042:( 1972:ᗙ 1968:X 1962:D 1935:( 1907:( 1834:( 1760:( 1657:( 1640:J 1638:- 1613:( 1577:( 1562:( 1533:( 1518:( 1510:( 1484:( 1466:( 1443:( 1423:( 1407:( 1383:( 1360:( 1330:( 1322:( 1302:( 1275:( 1246:( 1216:( 1202:( 1187:( 1163:( 1142:( 1123:( 1058:( 1026:( 996:( 973:( 940:( 915:( 896:( 817:( 715:( 439:(

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index