User talk:LALAJI1234

3116: 1921: 626: 473: 2588:

ban on SASG must have expired. And hence, I completed its editing. I did it without being aware that ban was still active. So this incident happened because of my negligence of the fact that despite being banned on a particular topic I could still edit a particular article. So I would urge the editors to pardon this act of mine which unfortunately happened in ignorance of my knowledge . Thus, requesting the WIKIPEDIA COMMUNITY to unblock me

403: 316: 1766: 98: 1652: 1303:

and want to continue . I reiterate my reverts on 'Lalitadtya Muktapida' weren't wrong. I want my "indefinite ban" to be repealed without any conditions. I would like to proclaim that: • I will not use derogatory language against any editor in future. • I shall not threaten any editor for legal proceedings. • My edits shall be liable for scrutiny and debate. • My edits shall pertain to only south asian groups.

1534: 3184: 1834: 2910: 2747: 2502: 2183: 2002: 1363: 1217: 714: 535: 1751: 1696:. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. 1314:

As you were told above, you will not be unblocked without agreeing to a topic ban from South Asian social groups. Since you say that's the only area you want to edit in, you will need to remain blocked. A topic ban would not be permanent, but you will need to show us through your edits in other topic

1302:

I appologise for my initial comments that I made on the edits of 'Lalitaditya Muktapida'. I appologise for the comments I made against the administrator' specially for threatening a legal action ' (it was because of the heat of the moment). I have been genuinely been contributing to this encyclopedia

2587:

I admit my mistake of editing "Subhas Chandra Bose" page which falls under the category of "SASG" . While I was going through his article I found that information regarding his caste was missing. So I thought of adding it. I was astonished to see that I was able to edit it. So I thought that my said

2087:

Respected Editors, while appealing for my previous block scenario I was told to build consensus regarding edits pertaining to SOUTH ASIAN SOCIAL GROUPS. My recent edit to "Subhas Chandra Bose " was reverted . I agreed to those edits but had some concern about the "WHYS". For which I even reported to

1085:

If you show you understand all the problems with your edits and can show you would edit constructively, yes. It starts with you reading all the material I linked to. Personally, if you were a member of my ethnicity and had insulted other peoples as you have done, I'd have been much less tolerant. We

2446:

I have waited for one whole day but still my no one has reviewed my requests. I have admited my mistake of editing articles pertaining to "SASG". And would like to assure the community that such mistakes won't happen again in future. Thus, I request my block to be removed without any preconditions.

2334:

I will extend your block if you don't stop this nonsense. You are continuing to discuss topics that you're banned from via your unblock requests. You have made numerous violations of your topic ban now. It is also increasingly clear that you aren't here to build an encyclopaedia but just to advance

1785:

for more information on uploading your material to Knowledge. For legal reasons, Knowledge cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use

2385:

Despite admitting my mistakes I am not allowed to present my opinion. I am being threatened for further blocks without even knowing my side of argument.A particular editor has used derogatory terms in his address to my unblock request. I have also been accused irresponsibly of being here with a

2268:

I admit my mistake of editing pages pertaining to SASG. For that reason I wan't I want my block period to be reduced to 3 days. But I do reiterate the point that SUBHAS CHANDRA BOSE is indeed a "Bengali Kayastha". I have numerous sources ranging from books to JSTOR to prove it. This being his own

231:

in others. If you think your edits were incorrectly reverted, discuss it (civilly) with those who reverted them, bringing arguments founded in Knowledge’s guidelines. If you do not understand how something works here, you can ask at the Teahouse, but be open to the possibility that you are wrong.

2832:

For all those edits I made to SASG was done because of my limited knowledge that my block has expired as I was able to edit those pages. Hence, it was unintentional and done out of sheer negligence of the said knowledge. I request administrators to see this aspect of mine and waive off my block.

2291:

You violated your topic ban, were blocked, and violated it again in this very request. I think it is doubtful this block will be removed early, and should you continue to disrupt Knowledge with these requests, I will extend the block. I suggest you use this time to reevaluate how you participate

292:(admittedly I have not read all discussions related to caste because life is too short) to get a feel of how it works for Indian castes but my understanding is that it is very similar (only put down the caste if there are ironclad sources for it, and do not put too much emphasis on it). 1058:

I was going to say "I think an IPA topic ban is a must if the user is unblocked. We need to see evidence that they are here to build the encyclopedia and not just push a certain point of view. Also, what's with the all caps?" but the editor appears to have retired so all this is moot.

704:

WAIT MAN WAIT ......I WILL SUE YOU JUST WAIT MAN..... YOU ARE CONSIDERING YOURSELF A BOSSS AHHH.... I NEVER INTERWINED IN EDITS OF "ROYAL BRITISHERS". WHO THE HELL ARE YOU TO DISRUPT MY RELIGIOUS BELIEFS AND THAT OF SO MANY KAYASTHAS???? I WILL SUE YOU.... JUSYT WAIT AND WATCH!!!

2843:

If this were your first block ever, I might be a little more solicitous. But it isn't. You've had previous blocks extended, and you've agreed to a topic ban, which you're now blocked for violating ... and barely two days into that one-week block, you're demanding to be let out of

546:, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the 2147:

Just to inquire the wrong that I did by editing SUBHAS CHANDRA BOSE page I wrote about it inquisitivly on the editors talk page. "I wanted to know that why it's wrong to put the caste identity of the said person."? For that reason I have been blocked how fair is that?

2088:

the concerned editor. In my limited knowledge view I assure the Knowledge community that I haven't violated the terms of my previous unblocks. If I have then I would request my ban duration to be reduced for a period of 3 days and hence, my ban be revoked.

588:

Can I ask you MR? what was the reason to revert my edits on Lalitaditya Muktapida? The person who reverted it simply "undid" my edits without any basis . I accept my mistake on terming him "LUNATIC". But will you answer my first

244:

I want to know that how will I cite source of person's caste if his surname is the only source. This is why I asked the person who reverted my edits was an Indian or not? Caste has a different way of functioning in India.

1614:

I accept my ban on South Asian Social Groups. I will edit only on topics pertaining to politics , sports, culture, cuisine, and language. I shall prove myself with these edits. Hence, I want my ban to be repealed

3229: 1877: 2386:

particular agenda and not contributing towards the growth of encyclopedia. I am not used to this kind of "judgement ". It could have been told in a cultured manner. I urge other editors to take note of this.

256:

You do not need to know someone else’s nationality, birth place etc. to comment. If you think they are unaware of some cultural context, explain it to theme with some variation of "are you aware that ?".

201:

I think you have not read 'Chitraguptavanshi Kayastha'. Those who write SRIVASTVA/AMBASTA/ASTHANA/KARAN/NIGAM/MATHUR as their surnames are Chitraguptavanshis. This is unfair from your part to revert my

3213:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 1861:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 148:, and a secondary school should not be included in the "alma mater" information in an infobox in an article about a person. (The documentation for the infobox specifies that "alma mater" is 3019:

Yes, we know that when you are topic banned, there is nothing technical to prevent you from editing about it, a topic ban relies on the person themselves complying with it and nothing more.

796:

I WANT TO QUIT WIKIPEDIA . THANKS FOR MAKING IT INCLUSIVE AND SHOWCASING YOUR WESTERN SUPREMACY. AND YEAH I WONT "TOUCH YOUR TEMPLATES". JUST ADD ONE MORE WHICH WILL GUIDE ME TO QUIT IT.(

1179:

I have received my punishment of a ban. I want to be an independant editor . We learn from mistakes so I request the administrator to repeal my "indefinite ban" or reduce its duration.

1086:

just get so tired of the racists coming here and being racists. Whatever their ethnicity. Retirement works too. We do not delete user talk pages. Courtesy blanking may be an option. --

3198: 1847: 1731:

Sorry. I was busy in RL or would have done this earlier. Though it says indefinite, you can ask for the topic ban to be lifted after six months of constructive editing. Best wishes.--

1112:

If the reverend administrator thinks my edits are unworthy and that I am not contributing to wikipedia and I am here to just put one point of view then my talk page should be erased.

804:

The way to quit Knowledge is simply to stop editing. Unfortunately accounts can't be deleted. BTW please note also that there is no consensus on the existence of God; see for example

438: 417:

You have shown interest in South Asian social groups. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has enacted a more stringent set of rules. Any administrator may impose

364: 357: 349: 345: 1662:

You have been indefinitely topic banned from making any edits or comments related to castes or social groups, broadly construed. Please read WP:TBAN to see what "topic banned" means.

213:

On Knowledge, we judge contributions on their merits, not on the nationality or ethnicity of the editor who makes them. Any editor who follows the guidelines for editing is welcome.

273:

guideline which says (paraphrased) that you should not mention someone’s ethnicity is the lead unless it is a crucial part of their public identity. So, for instance, the lead of

1674: 372: 3094:

The block & the appeal have expired. You are reminded that the topic ban on South Asian social groups applies to discussing or adding that topic on ather articles.

1978:

Hi. You've been editing extensively on south asian social groups following your topic ban. Note that these blocks will escalate so please be careful when you return. --

2726:) 14:21, 28 November 2021 (UTC) Is it because you have already reviewed one. In that case I have to wait for another editor which may be cumbersome experience. 26: 1794:, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Knowledge takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy 779:

carefully before posting anything else here. One more legal threat, removal of block notices, or personal attack and you'll lose your talk page privileges. --

2888:

template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

2641:

template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

2605:, and others. I agree with SpacemanSpiff that I was overly kind. My suggestion is you wait out the one week quietly or you'll lose talk page access as well. 2326:

template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

2140:

template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

1493:

template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

1349:

template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

25: 1514:

I am interested in sports, religion, culture, politics. I won't create an article but would dedicate myself only in providing citations in these sectors.

3043:

declined. LALAJI1234 needs to take the time to calm down and consider the causes of the 1 week block rather than reflexively filing appeal after appeal.

571:

A heads up that if you continue to add caste information without consensus you will end up banned from all articles related to Indian social groups. --

1802: 1778: 1193:). However, the unblock will come with a topic ban on anything to do with South Asian Social groups. You can appeal the topic ban after six months. -- 999:

on South Asian social groups, and on India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, and perhaps on religion as well, should be part of any unblock conditions. --

1782: 2997: 2989: 2946: 2787: 2542: 2223: 2042: 1569: 1403: 1257: 43:! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Knowledge and get help from experienced editors like 375:. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. 447:. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. 3252: 2673:

Non administrators cannot review your request. Such a short block will not go to a community discussion, and I don't think you want it to.

1900: 3144: 2984: 2873: 2626: 2311: 2125: 1945: 1478: 1334: 742: 654: 501: 2162:

I want my block to be reviewed by a genuine editors and not by those who seem to have personnel enmity with my presence on WIKIPEDIA.

185:

Final warning: Please do not add castes to people or people to caste lists without reliable sourcing including self identification. —

2102:

is a clear violation of your topic ban. Honestly, I'm surprised that given your history, RegentsPark only blocked you for a week. —

144:

were also unsourced. Two points to keep in mind: "notable alumni" in a school article should not include individuals that are not

2941: 2782: 2537: 2218: 2037: 1564: 1398: 1252: 539: 3248: 1896: 368: 422: 2854:

won't have to deal with similarly impatient requests for that time. How you spend that time is up to you. Use it wisely. —

2464:

Admins are volunteers working on their own time and are not available 24/7. And only one open request is needed at a time.

845:, and you have not read my UTRS decline. As I do not see where you have been educated as to Knowledge's rules, please read 596:

What consensus are you talking about? Will you have a consensus on existence of God? Hey! You Christian I am asking you? (

224:. It is somewhat understandable if it was an angry outburst, but if you repeat that behaviour you are likely to be banned. 1681:. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions for that topic. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the 490: 159: 120: 3222: 3133: 1870: 643: 687:

Your block has been increased to one week. Please take the time to think about how to approach editing on Knowledge. --

3234: 1882: 1689:

for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.

1678: 1189:

LALAJI1234, I looked over your contributions and I'm willing to unblock you if you make a proper unblock request (see

418: 928:

My goodness. No. Please withdraw your legal threat first of all. We'll start with that.14:33, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

894:

is closed. Oh, so very closed. At the time of this writing, user has talk page access. Y'all more patient than I. --

2759:

Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the

2514:

Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the

2195:

Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the

2014:

Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the

1375:

Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the

1229:

Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the

732: 434: 353: 106: 3124: 2760: 2515: 2196: 2015: 1929: 1797: 1686: 1376: 1230: 727: 722: 634: 481: 430: 285:

does not describe her as "Kentucky actress" (at least until she starts funding a Kentucky independence movement).

133: 227:

If you have evidence that your edits were reviewed unfairly due to your nationality, please post it; otherwise,

2960: 2917: 2801: 2754: 2556: 2509: 2237: 2190: 2056: 2009: 1682: 1670: 1583: 1541: 1417: 1370: 1271: 1224: 826:

YOU BLOCKED ME AT FIRST BECAUSE I USED THE WORD "LUNATIC" TO WHICH I APPOLOGISED . THEN WHY FURTHER BLOCKS?---(

426: 110: 73: 281:(an actor who supported Scottish independence) mentions him as Scottish, rather than British; but the lead of 3080: 2342: 2109: 1151: 1099: 1012: 957: 907: 870: 842: 192: 250: 3137: 2366:? You can check my contribution list for that. It's wrong to say that I am here with a particular agenda. 1938: 647: 494: 262:

You won’t. Surname is not a reliable source for caste. Maybe you can guess with a 99% chance, but that is

1315:

areas and interactions with other editors that you can civilly contribute. I am declining your request.

3210: 3165: 3010: 2859: 2611: 1984: 1966: 1858: 1737: 1720: 1702: 1632: 1464: 1199: 1065: 1050: 785: 763: 693: 675: 613: 577: 560: 522: 458: 385: 932:

OK. I withdraw my legal threat as it was out of emotion which i yelled. 14:36, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

775:

I'm giving you a shot at coming back by not taking away your talk page privileges. I suggest you read

1774: 50: 2354:

So you can use the word "NONSENSE" ? How fair is that? I have stated in my unblock request thereby

846: 551: 274: 270: 607:

You cannot call other editors "lunatics" and you cannot speculate on their personal identities. --

3069: 2336: 2103: 1140: 1088: 1080: 1041: 1001: 978: 946: 896: 859: 813: 444: 221: 186: 57: 40: 738:

You are not allowed to edit Knowledge while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved.

2850:'s suggestion and revoke your talk page access for the duration, so that you ... well, so that 936:

Nice start. You will need to evince understanding of the other areas I linked to. Add to those

269:

Furthermore, even if you have a decent source about their caste, this probably falls under the

260:

I want to know that how will I cite source of person's caste if his surname is the only source.

150:...the linked name of the last-attended institution of higher education (not secondary schools) 3192: 1841: 1685:

to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be

1190: 776: 282: 162: 123: 3241: 3206: 3160: 3150: 3099: 3048: 3024: 3006: 2937: 2882: 2855: 2847: 2708: 2678: 2635: 2606: 2469: 2320: 2297: 2134: 1979: 1961: 1951: 1889: 1854: 1732: 1715: 1697: 1627: 1505: 1487: 1460: 1343: 1320: 1194: 1060: 1045: 986: 982: 780: 758: 748: 688: 670: 660: 608: 572: 555: 517: 507: 453: 408:

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect.

380: 322:

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect.

3221:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 1869:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 3115: 2895: 2765: 2727: 2719: 2689: 2659: 2520: 2482: 2448: 2428: 2427:

I want to be unblocked . Any terms and conditions placed by editors could be agreed upon.

2387: 2367: 2270: 2201: 2163: 2149: 2020: 1920: 1770: 1547: 1517: 1381: 1235: 1113: 1026: 827: 797: 625: 590: 543: 472: 289: 246: 172: 141: 137: 1173:--- As I used derogatory language. ( 'LUNATIC' was intentional but the rest weren't ) • 3218: 1866: 1811: 996: 547: 102: 2269:

identity should be included in his wikipedia page. I regret that it hasn't as of yet.

402: 315: 152:. It is usually not included at all if the person does not have a degree). Regards, -- 3214: 1862: 990: 937: 854: 850: 809: 542:. Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with 228: 171:

Thanks for your kind information. I shall take care in future regarding references.

1693: 1651: 941: 295: 278: 263: 233: 154: 115: 3183: 1833: 344:. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called 97: 3095: 3044: 3020: 2704: 2674: 2465: 2293: 1501: 1316: 341: 145: 2983:

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the

3063: 3039: 1806: 890: 1500:

What areas will you make edits in since you won't be editing in that area?

713: 3143:

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the

1944:

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the

741:

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the

653:

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the

500:

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the

337: 3256: 3225:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

3170: 3147:, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: 3103: 3088: 3052: 3028: 3014: 2903: 2863: 2735: 2712: 2697: 2682: 2667: 2616: 2490: 2473: 2456: 2436: 2395: 2375: 2348: 2301: 2278: 2171: 2157: 2115: 1989: 1971: 1948:, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: 1904: 1873:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

1818: 1781:

from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read

1742: 1725: 1707: 1637: 1509: 1468: 1324: 1204: 1183: 1159: 1121: 1107: 1070: 1053: 1034: 1020: 965: 915: 878: 835: 816: 790: 768: 745:, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: 698: 680: 657:, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: 618: 582: 565: 534: 527: 504:, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: 461: 388: 300: 238: 198: 180: 166: 127: 3202:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

2920:

has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

2413:

https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Knowledge:HARASS&redirect=no

1851:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

1666:

You have been sanctioned for making personal attacks and legal threats

841:

Yeah. If you think that's the only problem with your behavior, you are

805: 113:

and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.

920:

Please unblock me . Whatever I said was due to heat of the moment. (

277:

has to mention his work towards Pakistan independence; the lead of

1773:

has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added

333: 45: 995:

Should user clear all the other hurdles to unblocking, I believe

3238:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 1886:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 414:

imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

328:

imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

3228:

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

3196:

is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All

1876:

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review

1845:

is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All

68: 2987:, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the 3114: 2908: 2745: 2500: 2181: 2000: 1937:

for 1 week. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to

1919: 1532: 1361: 1215: 712: 624: 471: 3000:

that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

2916:

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an

1459:

Moot as you have already accepted it and been unblocked. —

394:

Community sanctions pertaining to South Asian social groups

2870:

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please

2623:

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please

2308:

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please

2122:

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please

1475:

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please

1331:

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please

2890:

Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

2643:

Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

2328:

Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

2142:

Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

1495:

Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

1351:

Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

3209:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the

2974: 2970: 2964: 2955: 2951: 2933: 2929: 2925: 2815: 2811: 2805: 2796: 2792: 2778: 2774: 2770: 2603: 2600: 2570: 2566: 2560: 2551: 2547: 2533: 2529: 2525: 2412: 2251: 2247: 2241: 2232: 2228: 2214: 2210: 2206: 2099: 2070: 2066: 2060: 2051: 2047: 2033: 2029: 2025: 1857:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the

1597: 1593: 1587: 1578: 1574: 1560: 1556: 1552: 1431: 1427: 1421: 1412: 1408: 1394: 1390: 1386: 1285: 1281: 1275: 1266: 1262: 1248: 1244: 1240: 217: 1448:

I agree for a topic ban on South Asian Social Groups.

603:

WHAT IS THE BASIS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

2599:

Unfortunately, it's not just the Bose article. I see

2362:. And since my previous blocks have I only edited on 1675:

Knowledge:General sanctions/South Asian social groups

2753: