482:
the first thing I will do is, to cure him based on what I learned and based on my experience. And I will not even think of printing a large document for him stating which medicines he should take, the medical reasons for it, the research behind each medicine, the success rate and giving him a long lecture on the procedure etc - yet NOT knowing anything about the medical field. But I fear you will do that, I mean ALL expect the medical help he need. Ok, coming to the topic, I am in the field of web design, web programming and related technologies for the last 15 years. I know what is worth mentioning and what is trash. While your argument of 'follow the rules' may sound correct, it will not help the
Knowledge users if you do it blindly. Giving you the utmost respect, I fear you have no clue on web design or related things. Of course you can counter argue that, such knowledge is not necessary to manage a Knowledge article. But I guess that makes you think this kid has done something great! And I have all the right to comment like my previous one, and this as I use Knowledge extensively. Whether I edit only one article or ten thousand at a a time doesn't matter - as long as I give importance to quality and not quantity. I don't believe in things like 'It is in a website, so it must be true' kind of rules. I agree I can't go ahead against those policies too. At the same time I can't watch helplessly how an attempt to get popularity out of nothing and shameless self promotion by the kids parents/other people succeed in Knowledge - which is a public domain. I will try my level best to fight against such malpractices and misuses of Knowledge but abiding the rules. Thanks again. --
523:
only two are discussing here, it may help both of us and also the huge number of
Knowledge users if some other person who is knowledgeable in this area and knowing the basic rules/policies of Knowledge intervene. I find it hard to explain to you, how useless and silly the long list of web badges as you stick on the rules adamantly. All the newspapers which listed those badges quoted what the kid/parents/people behind her mentioned and no link or other sources to check even such badges exist at all! On googling, only one web badge has existence and that is clearly a 'pay to receive' award :( All other links goes to the kids site or those newspaper links, again quoting her/her parents! Also, I see you always jump to prove she is/was the youngest CEO/Webdesigner, in fact she is/was never! The recent edit by you clearly shows that. It is not my words or my assumption but huge number of sources which proves it is/was never true. The whole story and Knowledge article was based on these two main points. Really hope someday some sensible and senior Knowledge admin realize it and remove this promotional material. --
445:
the discussion related to this article) are more important than these 12 awards. You asked me to provide sources and I ask you on the same! Result will be the same thing. You will not find anything related to those awards. Those doesn't exist at all. These are all a very clever way of marketing and shameless self promotion of zero talent. Again, I agree we have no other way but to keep the mention of web badges, as the
Knowledge policy related to it is very bad at this scenario. Sad, people still go blindly on policies and never think on the people whom Knowledge is for :( --
347:
299:
464:, with all due respect, you cannot speak on behalf of the Knowledge readers, nor can you assume to know exactly what is best for them. These policies that we "blindly" follow are actually the result of thousands of hours of discussion, by the readers, and editors of Knowledge. They outline what has been important. I think you also need to factor in the fact that you've only ever edited the article
31:
468:. Unless you have another account, your time on Knowledge is very isolated, and you'll find these policies, on other larger articles, are incredibly important and have preserved some fairly important articles from becoming a mouthpiece for one particular group to express their views on someone truly famous and important.
522:
I know my words may get wrongly interpreted as 'I know this, so it must be true' too! But I am not sure how to take this to a discussion page in
Knowledge, like we discuss when propose an article for deletion. Is there anyway we can invite others into this discussion and asking them to comment on? As
481:
On a lighter but important note - Let me write an example and it may make things simple for you! You are a rocket scientist, your reputation is so high internationally. I am a Doctor in a village. We both work for a hospital. If some patient come to the hospital who need immediate attention and care,
426:
The subject of the article is notable. The content including the awards, do not have to be notable themselves to be included. Merely that a reliable third party source, i.e. a newspaper which has been provided, thought it was worth mentioning in an article about her and therefore meet our criteria to
444:
While I agree you mentioned the
Knowledge policies to keep those badges, please ask yourself whether these silly list will help any Wiki user. Not a personal statement, but just google up and you will find a membership in the local library (these words were mentioned by some senior member before, in
411:
I request you to please provide links to any of those 10 'web badges', other than the kid's own site or the newspaper links, so that we can verify the importance of those web badges/web links which everyone will get. None of the so called web badges/web awards has any links or sources over internet.
459:
POV pushing a very large problem on
Knowledge. There are plenty of articles that are slanted in a direction because aspects of the article were removed under the rationale, "silly, unimportant, Knowledge readers won't like it." Sometimes these seemingly trivial facts actually end up being important
412:
They are just like funny pictures which kids put in websites. Please provide more info on those web badges if you really think they are of any importance. Else we can remove them all keeping only the real awards.--
372:
BLP requires a source for any addition of contentious material being added. You're going to need to provide a reliable third party source that state those are mostly web awards.
427:
be mentioned. Importance is decided that way, not by your opinions about web awards. You're going to need to find a policy on why you want those awards removed other than
39:
23:
235:
Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The
56:
195:
360:
316:
166:
244:
283:
94:
238:
331:
55:
If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the
158:
279:
207:
150:
138:
49:
428:
45:
130:
387:
122:
465:
353:
346:
327:
305:
298:
257:
395:
83:
474:
437:
431:. I've provided my rationale why they've been included which is supported by a policy.
404:
378:
391:
524:
483:
461:
446:
413:
323:
30:
243:
247:
button, on the tool bar above
Knowledge's text editing window, also does this.
469:
432:
399:
373:
64:
63:
Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to
237:
532:
491:
476:
454:
439:
421:
406:
380:
335:
312:
287:
254:
If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the
363:
at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
345:
319:
at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
297:
229:
188:
115:
76:
162:— a summary of Knowledge's most important rules.
134:— quick reference on Knowledge's mark-up codes.
44:I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to
170:— A thorough step-by-step guide to Knowledge.
8:
48:. As a first step, you may wish to read the
352:Hello, LVerina. You have new messages at
304:Hello, LVerina. You have new messages at
142:— an overview of Knowledge's foundations
154:— a Wizard to help you create articles
394:does not apply to these removals per
7:
126:— a guide on where to ask questions.
65:the world's largest encyclopedia...
14:
242:
236:
29:
211:— Knowledge's hub of activity.
199:— a guide on how you can help.
1:
336:13:05, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
313:13:05, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
288:13:25, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
57:New contributors' help page
559:
533:11:04, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
492:08:41, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
477:03:32, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
455:03:19, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
440:03:10, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
422:03:02, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
407:02:57, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
386:Here is the direct policy
381:02:50, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
390:and please note that the
196:Contributing to Knowledge
528:
487:
450:
417:
275:good luck, and have fun.
71:Finding your way around:
350:
302:
280:Pharaoh of the Wizards
159:The simplified ruleset
349:
301:
139:Knowledge's 5 pillars
40:Welcome to Knowledge!
25:Welcome to Knowledge!
354:Sanjoy64's talk page
95:Department directory
306:Yunshui's talk page
22:Hello LVerina, and
466:Sreelakshmi Suresh
361:remove this notice
351:
317:remove this notice
303:
224:Additional tips...
167:Guide to Knowledge
270:
269:
219:
218:
183:How you can help:
178:
177:
105:
104:
84:Table of contents
550:
472:
435:
402:
376:
364:
320:
246:
240:
230:
208:Community portal
189:
116:
77:
33:
28:
26:
558:
557:
553:
552:
551:
549:
548:
547:
470:
433:
400:
374:
370:
365:
358:
343:
321:
310:
295:
290:
271:
226:
220:
185:
179:
112:
106:
73:
34:
24:
21:
19:
12:
11:
5:
556:
554:
546:
545:
544:
543:
542:
541:
540:
539:
538:
537:
536:
535:
508:
506:
505:
504:
503:
502:
501:
500:
499:
498:
497:
496:
495:
494:
429:WP:IDONTLIKEIT
369:
366:
357:
344:
342:
339:
311:Message added
309:
296:
294:
291:
268:
267:
264:
263:
250:
249:
248:
228:
222:
217:
216:
213:
212:
202:
201:
200:
187:
181:
176:
175:
172:
171:
163:
155:
151:Article wizard
145:
144:
143:
135:
127:
114:
108:
103:
102:
99:
98:
89:
88:
87:
75:
69:
61:
35:
20:
18:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
555:
534:
530:
526:
521:
520:
519:
518:
517:
516:
515:
514:
513:
512:
511:
510:
509:
493:
489:
485:
480:
479:
478:
475:
473:
467:
463:
458:
457:
456:
452:
448:
443:
442:
441:
438:
436:
430:
425:
424:
423:
419:
415:
410:
409:
408:
405:
403:
397:
393:
389:
385:
384:
383:
382:
379:
377:
367:
362:
355:
348:
340:
338:
337:
334:
333:
329:
325:
318:
314:
307:
300:
292:
289:
285:
281:
277:
276:
266:
261:
260:
259:
253:
252:
251:
245:
239:
234:
233:
232:
231:
227:
225:
215:
210:
209:
205:
204:
203:
198:
197:
193:
192:
191:
190:
186:
184:
174:
169:
168:
164:
161:
160:
156:
153:
152:
148:
147:
146:
141:
140:
136:
133:
132:
128:
125:
124:
120:
119:
118:
117:
113:
111:
101:
97:
96:
92:
91:
90:
86:
85:
81:
80:
79:
78:
74:
72:
67:
66:
60:
58:
53:
51:
47:
43:
42:
41:
32:
27:
16:
507:
388:WP:BLPREMOVE
371:
326:
322:
274:
272:
265:
256:
255:
223:
221:
214:
206:
194:
182:
180:
173:
165:
157:
149:
137:
129:
121:
109:
107:
100:
93:
82:
70:
68:
62:
54:
50:Introduction
38:
37:
36:
460:to others.
262:is for you.
315:. You can
131:Cheatsheet
110:Need help?
396:WP:3RRBLP
273:LVerina,
123:Questions
359:You can
341:Talkback
293:Talkback
525:LVerina
484:LVerina
462:LVerina
447:LVerina
414:LVerina
324:Yunshui
258:Sandbox
17:Welcome
392:WP:3RR
529:talk
488:talk
471:Mkdw
451:talk
434:Mkdw
418:talk
401:Mkdw
375:Mkdw
284:talk
46:stay
368:BLP
241:or
531:)
490:)
453:)
420:)
398:.
286:)
278:--
59:.
52:.
527:(
486:(
449:(
416:(
356:.
332:ć°´
330:‍
328:雲
308:.
282:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
