304:
215:
channel, get prophecies, and then the prophecies don't happen and the channelers are baffled. I've known many people who've communicated with spirits and the spirits either did prophecy or he spirits said they'd give them supernatural powers and well the spirits lied and that was that. So you have to be careful what spirits to trust when channelling.
339:
112:
191:
an edit war and on some articles completely phoney sources are considered valid and on others they only count online news articles. It all depends on the people who show up to fight over the article's content. Knowledge likes online news articles but then the online news article has factual errors like one guy who runs
248:
Therefore we do not permit original primary publication of facts. Instead, we are a "secondary source" or a "tertiary source." This is standard for an encyclopedia, and is essential for us. This means that material should not be added to
Knowledge unless there is a reliable source for it. A reliable
253:
You claim to be the author, and assuming good faith, I believe you. However, we cannot act on this belief: the person whose username is
Lcarroll could in fact be some nutcase with an axe to grind to damage the reputation of the actual author, or a fan of the author, or anybody. Therefore, we cannot
190:
Also you went and corrected factual errors about a subject matter that you're an expert on. This has happened on wikipedia many many times before. It has always ended badly. There's lots of stories about it if you google. What is taken is fact and reliable on wikipedia is basically whoever wins
214:
Also, I saw that you channelled information from a spirit for your work. This is always curious because I know a bit about this and I know some stuff about that and well, there's actually a bunch of spirits out there that will lie to people and make stuff up, which can even be seen by people that
257:
So what should you do? You should publish your factual material at a reliable source, and then cite the source when you add the material to the WP article. While we do not in general use blogs as a reliable source, a signed article by you on your publisher's web site will certainly count as a
237:
I see that you have run afoul of our "reliable sources" policy. This can be extremely frustrating when you are an expert or when you have personal knowledge. Please allow me to give you some background to show how our policy follows is a logical consequence of how we operate.
354:
policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should
195:
gives a fake name to reporters as "Christopher Poole" and the news sites report it like it's true. There's been other offshoots like
Citizendium that value experts, but without allowing the masses of the internet to edit, they'll always be small sites.
170:
Eugene's statement is not quite correct. We have no method of verifying your identity, so you cannot add unverifyable assertions to WP even if you know them to be true. Sorry. This can be very frustrating. Please see below. Please don't get discouraged.
186:
I read the wikipedia article on them (not your books) and well isn't the whole thing of indigo children in a way the opposite of autism? Autists have trouble understanding people, communication, socal issues, etc. whereas indigo people excel at it?
211:, maybe you can simply note factual errors there and use that to correct things and reference the website. I recommend doing that. Just don't make it blatant saying "here's wikipedia errors to correct" but reference some article on the website.
265:: we discourage editors with a potential conflict of interest from editing an article. However, we do not prohibit it. To avoid any possibility of this, you may choose to discuss your edits on the article's discussion page first.
154:
You can't just go claiming to be the author. WikiPedia is going to need proof that you are the book's author before you go editing an article you "claim" to be about something of yours. Please show us proof. Thank you. -
199:
If you try to fight over your content, well you're fighting using your real life identity and the other people are fighting using anonymous pseudonyms so whatever they do, it won't stick to their real name.
268:
About me: I am merely one of the six million
Knowledge editors. I have no more or less authority or responsibility than you do. Good luck. If you need help, please feel free to contact me on my talk page.
249:
source is a source that does have the infrasructure in place to identify its authors and hold them accountable (at least in theory.) This includes newspapers, book publishers, journals, etc.
33:
73:
60:
43:
220:
50:
245:
we do not have a mechanism to verify who our editors are, and we do not have the infrastructure in place to create such a mechanism.
86:
Please sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing ~~~~; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.
401:
351:
421:
347:
308:
216:
71:
If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the
374:
articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
381:
320:
342:
If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article
409:
405:
417:
160:
140:
124:
431:
254:
give the person with this username any more (or less) accountability and authority than anyone else.
274:
176:
65:
55:
416:
For information on how to contribute to
Knowledge when you have conflict of interest, please see
328:
156:
136:
132:
94:
425:
343:
316:
208:
116:
39:
I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:
420:. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see
391:
270:
172:
120:
77:, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type
303:
324:
312:
289:
262:
297:
390:
to the
Knowledge article or website of your organization in other articles (see
293:
204:
90:
115:
Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with
Knowledge. Your test on the page
83:
on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.
128:
288:
Please read and abide by the above (and the following) admonitions about
338:
300:. If you continue this type of editing you will be blocked from editing.
111:
436:
332:
278:
224:
180:
164:
144:
98:
192:
400:
relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to
203:
Well... Basically since they use your website as a reference for
384:
about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
131:. If you would like to experiment further, please use the
307:
Please stop. If you continue to violate
Knowledge's
418:our frequently asked questions for businesses
8:
123:or removed. Please take a look at the
7:
311:by adding your personal analysis or
127:to learn more about contributing to
422:our conflict of interest guidelines
61:Contribute, Contribute, Contribute!
14:
337:
302:
110:
22:We can't say that loudly enough!
350:. In keeping with Knowledge's
1:
315:into articles, as you did to
165:21:47, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
145:21:46, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
99:17:58, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
406:verifiability of information
66:Tell us a bit about yourself
309:no original research policy
89:We're so glad you're here!
74:new contributors' help page
452:
323:from editing Knowledge. .
437:02:10, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
333:01:42, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
279:16:04, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
225:04:44, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
181:18:35, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
119:worked, and it has been
217:Are you ready for IPv6?
56:Play nicely with others
361:exercise great caution
135:instead. Thank you. -
402:neutral point of view
352:neutral point of view
30:Hello, Lcarroll, and
382:deletion discussions
348:conflict of interest
34:welcome to Knowledge
230:"Reliable sources"
424:. Thank you. --
346:, you may have a
290:original research
258:reliable source.
242:anybody can edit.
129:this encyclopedia
51:Learn from others
25:
443:
434:
428:
341:
306:
298:reliable sources
114:
81:
19:
451:
450:
446:
445:
444:
442:
441:
440:
432:
426:
410:autobiographies
398:avoid breaching
344:Indigo children
317:Indigo children
286:
232:
209:Indigo children
152:
150:Indigo children
117:Indigo children
108:
79:
12:
11:
5:
449:
447:
414:
413:
395:
392:Knowledge:Spam
385:
375:
319:, you will be
301:
285:
282:
251:
250:
246:
243:
231:
228:
184:
183:
151:
148:
107:
104:
69:
68:
63:
58:
53:
48:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
448:
439:
438:
435:
429:
423:
419:
411:
407:
403:
399:
396:
393:
389:
386:
383:
379:
378:participating
376:
373:
369:
366:
365:
364:
362:
358:
353:
349:
345:
340:
335:
334:
330:
326:
322:
318:
314:
310:
305:
299:
295:
291:
283:
281:
280:
276:
272:
266:
264:
259:
255:
247:
244:
241:
240:
239:
235:
229:
227:
226:
222:
218:
212:
210:
206:
201:
197:
194:
188:
182:
178:
174:
169:
168:
167:
166:
162:
158:
149:
147:
146:
142:
138:
134:
130:
126:
122:
118:
113:
106:February 2009
105:
103:
101:
100:
96:
92:
87:
84:
82:
76:
75:
67:
64:
62:
59:
57:
54:
52:
49:
47:
46:
42:
41:
40:
38:
37:
35:
28:
27:
23:
18:
415:
397:
387:
377:
371:
367:
360:
356:
336:
294:verification
287:
267:
260:
256:
252:
236:
233:
213:
202:
198:
189:
185:
157:Eugene Krabs
153:
137:Eugene Krabs
125:welcome page
109:
102:
88:
85:
78:
72:
70:
44:
32:
31:
29:
26:
21:
16:
15:
427:Orange Mike
205:Lee Carroll
284:March 2009
80:{{helpme}}
313:synthesis
271:Arch dude
234:Hi, Lee.
173:Arch dude
372:creating
325:Ward3001
121:reverted
45:Be Bold!
17:Welcome!
394:); and,
388:linking
368:editing
321:blocked
133:sandbox
408:, and
363:when:
263:WP:COI
261:About
91:Lumos3
357:avoid
296:with
193:4chan
433:Talk
329:talk
292:and
275:talk
221:talk
207:and
177:talk
161:talk
141:talk
95:talk
430:|
380:in
370:or
359:or
404:,
331:)
277:)
223:)
179:)
163:)
143:)
97:)
412:.
327:(
273:(
269:-
219:(
175:(
171:-
159:(
139:(
93:(
36:!
24:)
20:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
