Knowledge

User talk:Labor Watch

Source 📝

307: 123: 65: 43:
about the "Did You Know..." section of the labour portal. It was sparked by the entry that you added, and your input into the conversation is certainly welcome. My apologies for not notifying you sooner - the conversation has been going on for a few days, and I think a general agreement has been
24:
and the labour portal, so I thought I would say hello and welcome. I'm guessing by your name (not much of a guess) that you're interested in the labor movement. You've found the portal, but you might also find some useful resources at the WikiProject -
260:
As you may guess by my name I have an interest in labor issues, but I don't know labor reporter. Since I haven't edited in six weeks, I'm not sure what I did to deserve being blocked. Perhaps a shared IP?
253:
template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.
364:
If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one.
163: 339: 238: 100: 338:
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see
158: 276:
It's a shared computer. Labor Reporter, and the two other accounts I blocked, all were used from the same computer as you.
40: 84: 135:
Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the
177: 136: 72: 130: 354: 314: 300: 224: 343: 49: 30: 322: 318: 296: 17: 262: 247: 220: 141: 90: 26: 80: 327: 277: 104: 365: 347: 332: 45: 331:
will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a
368: 289: 270: 228: 116: 52: 33: 44:
reached to more closely link the DYK page with the DYK page on the
21: 305: 121: 63: 39:
Just to let you know, there has been a bit of discussion at
362:
Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced.
235:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please
255:
Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
191: 187: 181: 172: 168: 154: 150: 146: 129:
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an
335:that directly supports material in the article. 321:because it appears to have no references. Under 83:. If you would like to be unblocked, you may 8: 219:Checkuser leads us to believe otherwise. — 346:. Once you have provided at least one 208:not a sock puppet or a puppet master 7: 20:to Knowledge. I saw your edits to 14: 1: 328:biography of a living person 41:Portal talk:Organized Labour 133:, who declined the request. 384: 369:11:45, 22 March 2017 (UTC) 99:, but you should read the 340:Referencing for beginners 290:01:37, 3 April 2012 (UTC) 271:01:22, 3 April 2012 (UTC) 239:guide to appealing blocks 229:04:30, 3 April 2012 (UTC) 117:04:22, 2 April 2012 (UTC) 101:guide to appealing blocks 81:abusing multiple accounts 266: 53:16:21, 6 June 2007 (UTC) 34:02:18, 1 June 2007 (UTC) 310: 126: 68: 350:, you may remove the 319:proposed for deletion 315:Charles E. James, Sr. 309: 301:Charles E. James, Sr. 178:change block settings 125: 95:Your reason here ~~~~ 67: 87:by adding the text 311: 127: 69: 297:Proposed deletion 85:appeal this block 79:from editing for 375: 359: 353: 342:, or ask at the 323:Knowledge policy 308: 252: 246: 197: 195: 184: 166: 164:deleted contribs 124: 98: 66: 16:Hi Labor Watch, 383: 382: 378: 377: 376: 374: 373: 372: 357: 351: 348:reliable source 333:reliable source 306: 304: 258: 250: 244: 243:, then use the 232: 210: 185: 175: 161: 144: 137:blocking policy 122: 119: 88: 64: 61: 48:page. Cheers.-- 12: 11: 5: 381: 379: 355:prod blp/dated 303: 294: 293: 292: 285: 282: 233: 217: 213:Decline reason 206: 202:Request reason 199: 120: 112: 109: 70:You have been 62: 60: 57: 56: 55: 46:main Knowledge 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 380: 371: 370: 367: 363: 356: 349: 345: 341: 336: 334: 330: 329: 324: 320: 316: 302: 298: 295: 291: 288: 287: 286: 283: 280: 275: 274: 273: 272: 268: 264: 257: 256: 249: 242: 240: 231: 230: 226: 222: 216: 214: 209: 205: 203: 198: 193: 189: 183: 179: 174: 170: 165: 160: 156: 155:global blocks 152: 151:active blocks 148: 143: 138: 134: 132: 131:administrator 118: 115: 114: 113: 110: 107: 102: 96: 92: 86: 82: 78: 75: 74: 58: 54: 51: 50:Bookandcoffee 47: 42: 38: 37: 36: 35: 32: 31:Bookandcoffee 28: 23: 19: 361: 337: 326: 313:The article 312: 279: 278: 259: 254: 236: 234: 218: 212: 211: 207: 201: 200: 173:creation log 140: 128: 106: 105: 94: 77:indefinitely 76: 71: 29:. Cheers. -- 15: 263:Labor Watch 221:Daniel Case 142:Labor Watch 169:filter log 344:help desk 317:has been 237:read the 188:checkuser 147:block log 159:contribs 93:|reason= 27:WP:UNION 325:, this 248:unblock 182:unblock 103:first. 91:unblock 73:blocked 59:Blocked 18:welcome 360:tag. 241:first 284:fold 281:Hers 267:talk 225:talk 111:fold 108:Hers 22:AFGE 299:of 192:log 139:). 366:TM 358:}} 352:{{ 269:) 251:}} 245:{{ 227:) 215:: 204:: 186:• 180:• 176:• 171:• 167:• 162:• 157:• 153:• 149:• 97:}} 89:{{ 265:( 223:( 196:) 194:) 190:( 145:(

Index

welcome
AFGE
WP:UNION
Bookandcoffee
02:18, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
Portal talk:Organized Labour
main Knowledge
Bookandcoffee
16:21, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
blocked
abusing multiple accounts
appeal this block
unblock
guide to appealing blocks
Hersfold
04:22, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
administrator
blocking policy
Labor Watch
block log
active blocks
global blocks
contribs
deleted contribs
filter log
creation log
change block settings
unblock
checkuser
log

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.