User talk:Lembit Staan/Archive 3

352:, right? Even in policy pages we have well-recognized essays in "see also" . But usually they are clearly marked as essays (at least that's what I and some other wikipedians to). The same here: there must be a clear indication that books are just opinions, not consensus. People tend to think that printed word is some kind of ultimate wisdom (after all, wikipedian's ultimate trump is a reference, right?) In the case of our policies it is an exception, and must be clearly marked a such. 2337:. I wasn't aware of that problem, but your edits made me look into it more closely: it seems like vault.com is used c. 200 times on en-Knowledge (XXG) - most often as vanity "award" for the "best place to work in" in older references or, more recently, for relatively trivial branche-internal opinion polls. Especially articles about consultant companies with significant SPA edits seem to include that kind of reference to boost their reputation. Do you think, a discussion at 31: 689: 143:..I am puzzled at why you believe more information about the topic at hand on this essay page is not valuable to our readers. You mentioned in your edit summary that it s an "internal page" ...as someone who edits theses types of pages I can assure you list of books about the topic at hand is the norm on many. What are the problems with the books listed?? Are you suggesting MIT or Stanford University are not reliable sources?-- 839:. Your interpretation of the plot is probably correct, and I'm not challenging that; however, I am challenging your original research, or, more correctly, that of the original IP editor. If you really insist, we can go to RSN, where they will probably tell you what I just did. The last time I did this, people said I was wasting time by bringing such an obviously open-and-shut issue to the noticeboard, so I'd rather not. 1806: 2414: 1199: 1086: 228:: the whole idea behind this page is to be a minimal hub to start from. Anyway, I reverted myself after figured out how to keep your list: It must be phrased not as "further reading", i.e., as an endorsement, but as a regular section saying something like, "with wikipedia coming to age it became subject of scholarly research and monographs blablabla...:" I believe you can do this better than me. 1481:, I can imagine that the person was upset that they were reverted, but I don't think we are in the business of brain-shrinkers here; we are writing wikipedia. If a person numerous times ignores clearly written comments, then regardless their fragile psyche, they are disrupting wikipedia. Since you appear to be willing to mentor this user, please tell him not to act while being upset, or else. 255:

that that have much less info on them....this page is for the history on the topic. I will chalk this up to a simple oversight on what we are here to do..that is to inform readers as much as possible ...inducing reading material from outside researchers and opinions on internal matters. Compiling bibliographies is a major activity of historians and scholars here on Knowledge (XXG). --

2196:, it's done since August 2013 (see the discussion page of this map). About a discussion with Poznaniak, I tried. He stay on his source and position. Volunteer Marek have also this position. May be, it's the official position in Poland about the Polish-Moldavian relation in the middle-ages ? Too bad... It's not very important. Thanks for your good will. Wishes, -- 1043:

article, you would use WikiProject Biography; if it's a United States article, you would use WikiProject United States, and so on). You do not have to rate the article if you do not want to, others will do it eventually. Those templates are very useful, as they bring the articles to a WikiProject attention, and allow them to start tracking the articles through

3182: 969: 2573:

about the duck, it is OK no include the image of the duck. I am afraid we are in a severe disagreement here. Which discussion board do you prefer to resolve the disagreement? (I hope you understand that the Jones has nothing to do with the issue.) By the way I did know what I did; I am not that imbecile. I did not know what

3103:

has misrepresented you and we will both examine the issue and act accordingly. We wish to insure that you are represented accurately, but it is not appropriate for a party involved in a story to rewrite the story the way they want it, as the story is supposed to be a neutral view of the story from a

2661:

You seem to have a unique interpretation of what is and is not refspam. It is inappropriate to add external links as if they are references when they are not. WP:REFSPAM says, "Citation spamming is the illegitimate or improper use of citations, footnotes or references." WP:EL begins, "Knowledge (XXG)

829:

is an example of evil A.I. and truly believe it in all my heart, but without a citation to a reliable source to verify it, it's just original research on my part. I think you see the problem. Editors do not make the determination as to whether an individual work is an example of a plot element, and

289:

are essays. They are in categories Knowledge (XXG) administration Knowledge (XXG) help Knowledge (XXG) policies and guidelines . Unlike essays, pages in these categories require a significant community consensus and changing of their content requires deep deliberation. See, e.g. the hatnote: "This

2227:

I appreciate that you're trying to improve Knowledge (XXG) and you have a good point to make (that you suggested in an edit summary, i.e. that the article is unsourced and/or original research). If the article stays as it is then the AFD would probably conclude "Delete" or "Redirect". But I prefer

1954:

Czołem! Usiłuję wprowadzić porządek w nazwach. Należy tez szybko zmienić tytuł a z tym mam na razie problem. Anti-Defamation jest nazwą zastrzeżoną i niewłaściwą dla Reduty Dobrego Imienia. Powinno być Polish League Against Defamation. W Wikipedii angielskiej wprowadzam zmianę pierwszy raz i wygląda

1642:

they are trying to HELP YOU. I am glad you were kind enough to tell me to take a break, but in that manner, if I was anyone else, I would have carried on doing the same old thing because I was infuriated with your thoughtlessness. I'm under 15. You were probably just a naïve as me when you were that

254:

that have these sections. I will try and thin of better wording for the section...but its best to lead our readers to as much info as possible on all topics...as internal information may not be presented in the best manner or complete. As for it being minimal start page..we have many other pages for

2172:

Thank you for your edit, but I do still see a problem. That problem is that that was good information. If that could be placed in the article itself that would be nice, but if you don't want to do this, then tell me and I will state that Cladida is an extinct order of Crinoidea. I thought you might

2108:

And last thing how can you promote hypothesis that is widely considered fantastic (Matrix movie) and ask for source for the opposite obvious judgement, it's an absurd, So maybe you want Knowledge (XXG) also to provide you with the source that Dragons don't exist? It's your role to provide Knowledge

1455:

Logic would tell you that, but people don't behave logically when they are upset. Their emotions take over. So, in addition to your two possibilities ("he can't read"; "he's a vandal"), I offer a third possibility: people say and do things when they're upset that they otherwise would not say or do.

1414:

Sorry for putting my remark on the AIV page instead of here. That was thoughtless of me. What you should do: It's the same old advice you've doubtless heard many times before: focus on the content rather than the contributor. Be polite to people even when they are behaving badly. Instead of saying,

304:

O well we will have to disagree about the classifications of the pages I write and how I structured them. In the future try to be more open to giving our readers more info from academic sources. I does no harm to info our readers with multiple POV;s. Having a further reading section does not mean

194:

I think there is some sort of confusion here ..as the page in question is an essay...not a guideline or policy. Are you sure you are aware of the page we are talking about? As someone who edits polices, guidelines and info pages I can assure that having more info for our readers is helpful. Still

2676:

Well, everybody is unique. After your recent clarification I understand what you have in mind. Judging by the beginning of this talk I assumed you were against adding links to these websites as such. I agree that they are not citations to confirm some article statements and therefore should not be

2572:

OK, thank you. If you are talking about link to eevblog.com, it is the website of the person who is the subject of the bio and which is itself is discussed the article. It is customary to include such information into bios. You can find links to twitter, facebook, and whats not. If you are talking

2044:

Dear "Stanisław", I have already provided several sources about simulations, haven't you noticed there? But what points do you want me to source more, please enumerate shortly, believe me all things I pointed out are very very easily sourceable/calculable even for high-school pupil interested (not

1618:

direction of Vertigo being snubbed and therefore I belive that this does not constitute as vandalism, but contributing to Knowledge (XXG) in a style that others have freely contributed. Furthermore, I understand that you have gone over my irrational thought, but I do not like this being expressed

834:

says, you really should not be restoring unsourced content once it's been challenged. The proper action is to locate a source. The burden is on you to prove that this is a notable example. I will go through the article and add citations later, but it is not really high on my list currently. In

3192:

regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to

2641:

re: "condescending tone." I am referring to your advice "please be careful next time" We are amid a dispute and you already firmly assuming that you are right and I am dead wrong. Of course it is commendable to hold your ground, and I have nothing against it. But as of this moment I am holding my

2486:

My answer was just as meaningless an your initial post. You are right guessing that the issue is now moot for me, but in the future rather than slapping and orange icon onto a long-time wikipedian, please be specific with your concerns. We are on the same page here, I believe; it remained only to

2059:

Also You should already know that: "Routine calculations do not count as original research, provided there is consensus among editors that the result of the calculation is obvious, correct, and a meaningful reflection of the sources. Basic arithmetic, such as adding numbers, converting units, or

1524:

Yes, I've noticed that (that's why I wrote about your mentoring), but you did not advice them not to act while upset. And not to piss on the walls, and not to break toys, etc. And next time he deletes a referenced text you tell him not to delete referenced text. And when he replaces the text of

805:

example in the sense that there is an article about "evil AI" which lists it as an example? - I don't know and I don't think we have a guideline to demand this. So if you was to make such a guideline, please start a central discussion somewhere, otherwise you can start hundreds of edit wars in

764:

I understand and share you concern with "popculture" lists. I am doing such cleanup myself whenever I run into an example farm. However it seems that we slightly differ about the criteria of inclusion. I take it is the subject constitutes a significant part of the plot, then it is reasonable to

119:

is erroneous. My pardon for using the Knowledge (XXG) terms "arbitration" and "mediation" incorrectly. My intention was to initially discuss this issue on the subject's wikipedia page. Failing that, I feel this is the next appropriate step for attempting to resolve the issue. In over 9 years of

606:

consider themselves to be Polish Americans. "Jewish immigrants from Poland, largely without exception, identified as "Jewish" or "Russian Jewish" when inside the United States, and faced a historical trajectory far different from that of the ethnic Poles." (which has a citation from a reliable

173:

policies. This is our internal affair, and only our community is the sole reliable source about policies of our community. No need to increase readers' confusion. If our policies are poorly written, then we have to edit them, and absolutely not refer: "OK, if you failed to grasp it, see what a

1042:

templates to the talk of that article? See the talk page of the article I mentioned for an example of what I mean. Usually it is very simple, you just add something like {{WikiProject Keyword}} to the article's talk, with keyword replaced by the associated WikiProject (ex. if it's a biography

1633:

I am probably a different type of person to both of you, but you can't go around, criticizing an administrator when you have no seeable power yourself. 'Piss on the walls.' 'Break toys.' 'OR ELSE.' HAVE I BECOME A MERE OBJECT IN YOUR CONVERSATION? I am disgusted. It is clear that you have no

277:. Also, I can say the same to you: "Your not new", so I assume you know the difference between essay and guideline. Therefore I attribute your stance only to the fact that you somehow formed yourself an opinion that it is an essay and didn't double-check when questioned. In fact, neither 892:

tag rather than outright revert. This will give time contributors to find a reference. This is the spirit of wikipedia cooperation. Outright deletion is for things which are reasonably expected to be wrong. If we go amok and start deleting unsourced text we will delete 37% of wikipedia.

571:

Okay. The section name has been changed to reflect statements by other editors rather than by unregistered editors. (It was there because we originally had an unregistered editor, which you obviously are not.) You will not be added to the list of parties, but are welcome to comment.

178:: their insights may be valuable, but irrelevant for the purposes of our guidelines. On the other hand, you are more than welcome to add these books to essays: places where personal opinions are vented (some of them are widely cited, but nevertheless they are not not guidelines). 931: 2534:

of the policy, which you failed to provide. I was not even speaking of the generous ridiculosity of your accusationalism about me allegationally trying to promotionalize something which I have no slightest idea about (since the latter is impossible to prove on the internets).

882:. HOwever its application requires common sense. To claim that Hobbit is AI is against common sense, so I can demand the ref. X.A.N.A is verififiably AI, and to challenge this fact is not common sense. However you do have right to demand references. But this is done with 1056: 2004:(or something more realistic like removing anonymous IP editing), while I'd consider that absurd and not likely to succeed, it seems like there's consensus to allow the person to still argue their viewpoint and then have it rejected if need be. -- 2300:

and remove my contribution. Clearly the explanation given is wake and limited to a case where N=2, while the induction method requires from us to assume that this N can be any natural number, so I had added explanation that is addressing any N.

2231:

Note a further reason for restoration at least temporarily is that the article has good inbound links from other articles which become "dablinks" if the redirect is in place. Those dablinks then show up on the worklists of disambiguators at

1063:. Thanks to them, WikiProject members are more easily able to defend your work from deletion, or simply help try to improve it further. Feel free to ask me any questions if you'd like more information about using those talk page templates. 2223:

discussion, to get views of more people and a decision by consensus? That would be normal process in wikipedia for deletion of articles (including redirects like this which is effectively a deletion) where there is any disagreement.

2246:

So I hope you don't mind but I will restore the article again now. Please do ping me or invite me at my Talk page, if you do open an AFD and it seems like I have not noticed it. But I probably will notice it and respond promptly.

2236:(including me, that's why I noticed it in the first place) and would likely get changed and be lost, which would be unfortunate if the "notification system" article gets improved during AFD and kept, which I think it will.] 824:

If you think that this is a notable example of evil A.I., you should cite a source that verifies this. Otherwise, it's original research to assert that it's a notable example – or even an example at all. I could say that

2646:

I am wrong. I am perfectly willing to accept your position in this detail as soon as you provide any argument: similarly you, I am strongly against commercial spamming of wikipedia and combatting it every time I see it.

2504:

I don't know if you're unaware of what you did, unaware of why it was inappropriate, or perhaps (given this discussion) you were just acting out. I chose to focus on policy. You appear to want to focus elsewhere. Sorry.

3774:

article. Since the incompetence of the admins on this site is nearly infinite I won't bother pursuing it any further personally, but if his vandalism continues, feel free to leave me a talk message if you require any

2093:

at first, not try to decide yourself without any discussion (as one-person-king-of-en-wikipedia) about this, that is GOOD practice here on English Knowledge (XXG) (i'm here since 12-2003 you shall not be newbie any

2074:

You have removed even in-line quotation, this is not original research, what are you doing my dear Stasia?;). (Może pogadamy po polsku bo jakbyś był po naszemu "wczorajszy" ;), a nie chciałbym swojemu robić więcej

1999:

The proposal has been userfied. I don't think there's any need for Wavelength to seek consensus on the draft at the moment and as such I reverted your removals. To me, if someone were to propose that we eliminate

3261:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 2594:

If you look closely at the diff, you'll see you edit-warred over three links. The eevblog and theamphour links are both REFSPAM. I think it safe to assume your edit summary was referring to the hackaday primary

2271:

Update: oh, i see that you on your own have restored it already. Thanks that is best I think. I will try to improve it with some references within a day or two. You can of course still open an AFD later.

120:

editing and through 5,000+ edits I have never had the need for formal dispute resolution, mediation, or arbitration. I request your forbearance in my inadvertent misuse of wikipedia terminology in this case.

290:

is an information page that describes a communal consensus". Books are not community consensus, they are personal opinions and they cannot be suggested as "further reading" about actual community consensus.

742:. It took forever, but almost all of those citations were added by me. I will eventually get around to doing the same for this article. Right now, it needs more citations, not more unsourced additions. 305:

we endorse anything ..its simply more info on the topic at hand and is the reason we are all here.These are not guidelines or policies they are INFORMATION pages about our policies and guidelines. --

3602:

Yes, I know that. The real issue is whether there ever be an any meaningful discussion of the subject under this title. This is what disambig pages are for: navigation among Knowledge (XXG) articles.

1241: 346:. The mere inclusion is an endorsement by itself: you list it because you think it is relevant for correct understanding our policies, right?. You don't list, say, an article "Knowledge (XXG)" from 2627:

notability, therefore IMO they are not REFSPAM. (Forget duck; my bad analogy.) Even when we are writing an article about a kook, we include his website and we don't call it REFSPAM of his kookery.

2228:

for the AFD to go on as I expect the article can be improved during the AFD. Also I don't want to improve it solely by myself in a sandbox; i want others to see it and make improvements to it.

1993: 665: 635: 3743:

If you want we can cancel the term Sintropy, but i will add again the contribution about negentropy. Did you read the book, at least? Or are you just speaking from the top of your throne?

699:

the autopatrolled right to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on

1437:

While in general I would agree, but in this case the issue was behavior, not content. The edit history clearly shows that this person cannot or would not read other's comments, see eg.

390:- All is under Admin if it has Wiki in the title...anyway s this "essay/advice/info page".. I have added some info and changed the section title. See if this helps your opposition.-- 3295:

Hello thank you for concern about article i made about Djibril Gibson Kagni but here is prove that he is real person and real artist and great music producer. please read this link

3339:

has received a request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to "David L. Jones". As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation.

639: 1814: 1810: 598:

in order to call him or Helea "Polish-American" you'll need to provide a reliable source saying that he self-identified as such. I don't need to provide a source, since the

1356: 1345: 3435: 3344: 1039: 927: 3343:

is a voluntary process which resolves a dispute over article content by facilitation, consensus-building, and compromise among the involved editors. After reviewing the

3575: 1113:

requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and

730:

In order for an example to be listed in an "in popular culture" article, it still needs a source that verifies that it is a notable example of such a topic. Per

1048: 1415:"Can't you read?" you could say "Please don't remove deletion discussion templates". Telling him to take a break was good advice, as he is obviously upset. -- 1052: 335: 216:

Nope. Not an essay. I checked before I wrote, because, as I said, in essays it would be OK. This page is a first-stop one. From it, people must be directed to

482:

I meant the organization of the wikipedia community; the way how it operates (admins, rules, etc.), not wikimedia. If you know a better word, please suggest.

3540: 3069: 2927: 2239:

BTW, I think it is fine that you made a "bold" change like your first redirect, but my revert/restoration indicates at least some disagreement, and then by

3189: 1955:

to trochę inaczej niż w polskiej. Dodałem źródło zewnętrzne - angielskojęzyczną stronę RDI. Pomóż proszę jeśli coś zrobiłem nie tak formalnie. Pozdrawiam

1264:

if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the

1533:" you will tell them not to replace. Well, it's your personal time. I have a hobby of writing wikipedia in my free time. I may admit you have a hobby ( 1251: 806:

numerous pop-lists (and I will join you, because I'd really like to cut them all as well, especially the AI :-) But I doubt you will find much support.

2662:

articles may include links to web pages outside Knowledge (XXG) (external links), but they should not normally be placed in the body of an article."--

174:

Stanford professor says". I am sure buddies of Andrew Lih or Charles Matthews would love to list their books wherever possible. So hereby I invoke

3431: 3352: 1161: 1106: 1841: 1714: 1703: 2591:"Please stop with this condescending tone." Sorry that you feel that way. How about making some suggestions rather than assuming it is intentional? 3220: 3209: 1591: 3348: 331: 556:

No. I am not a party I was offering a general-purpose opinion about lists of an uninvolved person. I have no opinion on the particular subject.

2551:

So you don't know what you did. Fair enough: You edit-warred to restore a link that was not a reference, REFSPAM. Be more careful next time. --

2317: 798:

can be an example for the discussed article - yes, per common sense, because you can easily find sources which say that X.A.N.A. is an evil AI.

3536: 3065: 2923: 3674: 3526: 3496: 3395: 3216: 3025: 2961: 2883: 1925: 1892: 1859: 1710: 1385: 1352: 1332:

Thanks for defending me on my ANI reporting of a particular individual. At least I'm not the only one who thought it was not acceptable. —

3286: 2756:

Hi Why did you break the link to Polish Knowledge (XXG)? I ask the question because I don't understand the markup/format you used. Cheers--

2426: 2076: 503: 453: 107:

https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard#Talk:Peter_Swirski.23Inflated_claims_of_UMSL_connections_and_possible_COI

1261: 765:

assume it is a notable example. I've seen many disputes where it is argued that self-evident examples do not necessarily need references

246:

Your not new so I am assuming you have seen our other main "info pages" (that are classified as essays here on Knowledge (XXG)) like

3427: 2363: 3359:

Because requests must be responded to by the Mediation Committee within seven days, please respond to the request by 5 December 2015.

1235: 724: 2418: 1165: 734:, you should not restore unsourced additions; if you think it's verifiable, then locate a source that verifies it. For example, see 595:

Given that A) Jack Warner was born in Ontario, Canada B) His parents were Yiddish-speaking (per the Knowledge (XXG) article on him)

735: 2827:

Actually it's all my fault; I should created the article myself, the moment I saw it missing, but I am lazy and don't care about

2451:

While I agree with your overall statement, wikipedia disagrees with your interpretation of of the type of the links you contest.

89: 81: 76: 64: 59: 3478: 3439: 3374: 3336: 3317: 3282: 2782:; unfortunately most people do not understand the joke and get offended. So, for the best explanation, please read the doc for 2201: 1783: 1754: 412:

says "Essays and information pages", i.e., they are expressly distinguished. Anyway, you did what I had in mind, thanks, bye.

3447: 1110: 3533:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 3438:, which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time. Please direct questions relating to this request to the 3062:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 2920:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 1929: 1918: 3646: 2155: 2118: 2099: 2065: 2050: 1153: 1097: 983:

For your continued edits on Poland-related topics, I am proud to award you The Polish Barnstar of National Merit, 1st Class

2998:. Considering the length of the articles, they should probably be merged into one article, but even then, they may not be 2297: 2283: 2261: 607:

source). I'm going to re-revert your change, and feel free to re-add them only if you can find a reliable source. Thanks.

2142:

Take a look for instance at publications of following Polish professor and ministry of education undersecretary of state

1837: 1833:

I would appreciate if you could kindly add Arcus Consulting Group (www.arcusgroup.ca) to the list of consulting firms on

1205: 1157: 1687: 1648: 1389: 1378: 3273:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to

1226: 1217: 3500: 3489: 3278: 2389: 1787: 1758: 1044: 640:

Knowledge (XXG):Administrators' noticeboard/Archive269#Category:Knowledge (XXG) usernames with possible policy issues

3645:

Re: Pirx. But for DYK you'll need to reference each para (and if possible, sentence). I'd add Stiller's quote from

3525:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

3054:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

2912:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

2887: 2876: 2388:. Please be advised that the tone of your notice is impolite regardless your "thank you". Please see the answer in 2197: 2090: 1265: 1247: 862: 844: 747: 38: 3137:

It is really is not that important for me so as to bother the author. If you don't want a correct presentation of

2828: 704: 3198: 2362:

Please be advised that categories are generally not supposed to go on redirects. Please stop adding them in. See

2178: 614: 577: 540: 384: 2313: 2151: 2114: 2095: 2061: 2046: 830:

they don't decide whether it's notable. This is handled through citations to independent reliable sources. As

3585: 3462: 3443: 2991: 2742: 2080: 509: 459: 950: 111:

I have requested that a disinterested third party weigh in on the editorial contention that the claim on the

3750: 3715: 3446:. For more information on forms of dispute resolution, other than formal mediation, that are available, see 2356: 1960: 1683: 1644: 125: 3305: 2999: 2309: 2305: 3780: 3370: 2465:

That would be incorrect. I don't expect you will make any attempt to back your assertion at this point. --

1896: 1885: 1198: 348: 47: 17: 3340: 3274: 1169: 1105:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing

3729: 3607: 3146: 2836: 2797: 2682: 2652: 2632: 2582: 2540: 2492: 2456: 2397: 2133: 2038: 2025: 1982: 1542: 1486: 1446: 1317: 1279: 1210: 902: 873: 858: 840: 811: 759: 743: 673: 561: 487: 417: 357: 295: 233: 183: 3631: 2243:

the next step would be for the bold actor to seek discussion, which in this case is properly at AFD.

1972: 1956: 1047:

and other tools. For example, WikiProject Poland relies on such templates to generate listings such as

738:. Note how each entry has a citation to a independent reliable source that verifies that the entry is 3725: 3603: 3296: 3142: 2832: 2793: 2678: 2648: 2628: 2578: 2536: 2488: 2452: 2393: 2129: 2021: 1978: 1670: 1628: 1563: 1538: 1482: 1442: 1313: 898: 807: 669: 557: 483: 413: 353: 291: 229: 179: 3194: 3007: 3003: 2677:

used as footnotes. Sorry for wasting your time. In the future I will follow this your clarification.

2174: 2009: 610: 573: 551: 536: 3309: 3250: 3241: 1122:

While all constructive contributions to Knowledge (XXG) are appreciated, content or articles may be

3597: 3579: 3454: 3399: 3388: 3313: 2860: 2811: 2761: 2738: 2346: 2216: 1779: 1750: 1625:

vividly. I can't get everything in the world, but that is something I would like to happen. And :::

1580: 1576: 498: 477: 448: 106: 3270: 3254: 879: 831: 731: 409: 377: 3746: 3711: 3167: 3116: 3100: 2371: 2147: 1821: 1595: 1298: 1255: 121: 2855:

Staszek, you were right, the routine worked. Eberhardt popped up after I created the article. --

1534: 286: 278: 274: 247: 175: 3434:. To read an explanation by the Mediation Committee for the rejection of this request, see the 447:

regarding the bolded, do you mean the Wikimedia organization? If so, it should be wiki-linked?

3776: 3689: 3654: 3556: 3511: 3474: 3410: 3366: 3231: 3085: 3040: 2995: 2976: 2943: 2898: 2806:

ok thanks for the info, I should take the next step and create the English article, regards--

2487:

nail down differences in the interpretation, which is impossible without talking specifics.

2278: 2256: 1940: 1907: 1874: 1863: 1852: 1725: 1506: 1461: 1420: 1400: 1367: 1178: 1136: 1069: 1012: 990: 647: 642:, which is what promted my to attempt to clean out the inactive editors from the category. -- 3703: 3266: 3258: 2001: 1735: 1294: 1114: 3627: 3029: 3018: 2965: 2954: 2737:. The thread is disturbing my equanimity. Good luck in the fight against his guerilla BLP ! 1615: 1302: 1275: 711: 3269:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 3262: 2338: 2240: 2233: 2220: 1123: 945: 739: 700: 282: 251: 3771: 2015: 2005: 1603: 1584: 939: 599: 3362:

Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page. Thank you.

1140: 1038:, which I read with interest. When you create a new article, can you add the WikiProject 273:

books on wikipedia, but they should not be endorsed as an authoritative source about our

3784: 3754: 3733: 3719: 3693: 3660: 3635: 3611: 3589: 3560: 3515: 3468: 3414: 3378: 3321: 3290: 3235: 3202: 3171: 3150: 3123: 3089: 3044: 3011: 2980: 2947: 2902: 2864: 2840: 2815: 2801: 2765: 2746: 2700: 2686: 2671: 2656: 2636: 2607: 2586: 2560: 2544: 2514: 2496: 2474: 2460: 2438: 2401: 2375: 2350: 2321: 2266: 2205: 2182: 2159: 2137: 2122: 2103: 2084: 2069: 2054: 2029: 1986: 1964: 1944: 1911: 1878: 1845: 1823: 1791: 1762: 1729: 1691: 1652: 1546: 1510: 1490: 1465: 1450: 1424: 1404: 1371: 1338: 1321: 1306: 1283: 1184: 1075: 1019: 996: 956: 906: 866: 848: 815: 751: 718: 688: 677: 651: 618: 581: 565: 544: 519: 491: 469: 421: 361: 314: 299: 264: 237: 204: 187: 152: 129: 2856: 2822: 2807: 2773: 2757: 2734: 2696: 2667: 2603: 2556: 2510: 2470: 2434: 2342: 1771: 1742: 1599: 1333: 395: 310: 260: 200: 165:

Please notice in my edit summary: "... it may (and will) change." Consequently, MIT is

148: 1244:. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page 894: 836: 770: 3678: 3667: 3547:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

3163: 3131: 3109: 3076:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

2934:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

2383: 2367: 2110: 1818: 1741:

Typically the lead is 4 paragraphs. Not sure why the heading "abdominal gerniation"?

1607: 1587: 1231: 1035: 602:

article already makes it clear that Jews living in Poland at the time as a rule, did

529: 342:

disagree that user may be informed about different opinions. However I disagree that

112: 2219:, which you have redirected to a disambiguation page twice, would you please open a 1834: 101:

Dispute resolution noticeboard request re Peter Swirski claim to UMSL faculty status

3685: 3650: 3552: 3548: 3507: 3406: 3227: 3081: 3077: 3036: 2972: 2939: 2935: 2894: 2786: 2273: 2251: 1936: 1903: 1870: 1721: 1677: 1637: 1570: 1519: 1502: 1472: 1457: 1432: 1416: 1396: 1363: 1174: 1065: 1008: 986: 659: 643: 3357:

please indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate.

2413: 932:

File:Wyniki RAŚ według gmin w wyborach do sejmiku województwa śląskiego (2010).png

535:

Are you requesting to be added to the list of parties to the dispute resolution?

1297:, please do not reopen non-admin closures of discussions you've participated in. 3530: 2917: 2913: 886: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

3108:

story is open for anyone to respond, so you can have your say in full there.

2577:

dislike, once again, for God's sake. Please stop with this condescending tone.

2341:

could help to address this issue (or at least raise some awareness about it)?

1093: 935: 795: 788: 777: 2193: 1634:

consideration for others feelings whatsoever, even if as is the case with :::

1146:

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing

3623: 3059: 2692: 2663: 2614: 2599: 2567: 2552: 2521: 2506: 2481: 2466: 2446: 2430: 1611: 707:. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! 403: 391: 321: 306: 256: 211: 196: 160: 144: 1537:) of teaching people manners in your free time. We both have our own fun. 1060: 968: 2642:

ground as well, because you did not prove I am wrong; so far you are only

3430:

concerning David L. Jones, to which you were listed as a party, has been

2060:

calculating a person's age are some examples of routine calculations." --

664:

Thx for expl. YOu could have written edit summary like: "rm category per

1813:

regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is

3257:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge (XXG)

3055: 3181: 835:

the meantime, any unsourced examples can be deleted by any editor per

1530: 1222:, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was 441:

Criticism of Knowledge (XXG), whether on its content, its community,

2296:

I am wondering for the reasons that lead you to correct the page in

2045:

only movie "Matrix" basing) in computer simulations and philosophy--

3297:

https://www.steinberg.net/en/artists/stories/2014/gibson_kagni.html

926:

the second uncited statement could be deduced from these two maps:

638:

should only contain actively editing people. Please see the thread

3724:

I don't have to verify anything. Did you see my edit summary? -

3188:

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the

3162:

Was wondering who was editing my user page, but that was helpful.

1526: 2417:

Please do not add promotional material to Knowledge (XXG). While

1234:

share with a country that is not a member of the Russian-aligned

2779: 1835:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/List_of_management_consulting_firms#/

668:

statute" . Surely, not many people remember all minute detail.

116: 2619:

eevblog and theamphour links are both websites operated by the

2143: 1994:

Knowledge (XXG):Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Global agenda

3576:

Knowledge (XXG):Manual of Style/Disambiguation pages#Red links

2501:

So it's about your not liking to be left a pre-written notice.

1193: 666:

Category:Knowledge (XXG) usernames with possible policy issues

636:

Category:Knowledge (XXG) usernames with possible policy issues

624:

Category:Knowledge (XXG) usernames with possible policy issues

195:

not sure why more info is not valuable in thus case at all --

25: 3099:

If you feel you have been misrepresented, please explain how

3180: 1084: 687: 2421:

about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services

344:

a further reading section does not mean we endorse anything

3704:

https://www.wikiwand.com/en/Nikolai_Aleksandrovich_Kozyrev

695:

Hi Staszek Lem, I just wanted to let you know that I have

1242:

Template:Did you know nominations/Lithuania–Poland border

338:. Therefore they must reflect community consensus. And I 3768: 3765: 3571: 3529:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 3058:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 2916:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 2549: 2334: 1497: 1478: 1438: 1164:

process can result in deletion without discussion, and

923: 696: 630: 140: 2733:

Sorry but I can't help further with Ronz's assault on

1594:

being snubbed is extremely similar to what I wrote of

1129:

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the

1811:

Knowledge (XXG):Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents

934:, but I guess it needs some more explicit citations? 1815:

User:Staszek_Lem reported by User:Samuel Williscroft

1240:

The nomination discussion and review may be seen at

857:

Ehh, I found a more-or-less reliable source for it.

269:

That's exactly my last point: it is OK to have info

3177:

Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion

3141:position, I am not going to go all wikilawyerwise. 703:. For more information on the patroller right, see 3626:. What are you talking about? Read the article. -- 3622:Sources precisely describe the tagged articles as 3574:. Do not forget that red links are not forbidden. 2427:a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion 2425:acceptable, Knowledge (XXG) is not intended to be 1682:Yeah, I have no idea why I wrote that, apologies. 1359:Talk:Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing 1346:Talk:Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing 497:Would "operations" then suffice? Or "procedures"? 3249:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current 3050:Disambiguation link notification for November 17 2778:As a computer programmer, I am tempted to write 977:The Polish Barnstar of National Merit, 1st Class 336:Category:Knowledge (XXG) policies and guidelines 3521:Disambiguation link notification for December 8 2908:Disambiguation link notification for October 31 1643:age. If you don't know me, don't persecute me. 3190:Knowledge (XXG):Dispute resolution noticeboard 1034:Thank you for your recent articles, including 326:Yes they are information pages, but they are 8: 3104:third party. The discussion section of any 2333:Hello Staszek Lem, thank you for your edits 1107:Knowledge (XXG):General notability guideline 1770:A brain herniation is not called a hernia. 1006:this WikiAward was given to Staszek Lem by 2598:What are your referring to, "the duck"? -- 2089:If you are questioning OR, you should put 1030:WikiProject assessment tags for talk pages 1214:was updated with a fact from the article 928:File:Gminy zamieszkane przez Ślązaków.png 773:, if they are not disputed. In our case: 1717:Talk:Identity theft in the United States 1704:Talk:Identity theft in the United States 1579:. As you can see in this article of the 3223:Talk:Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster 3210:Talk:Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster 2526:It is about me not liking fingerwaving 1135:notice, but please explain why in your 3767:about pseudoscientific stuff I removed 2364:Knowledge (XXG):Categorizing redirects 408:Yes, no guesswork, you are right, but 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 3651:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 2623:and in fact they are the base of his 2109:(XXG) with sources for this Bstrom's 1175:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 1066:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 1009:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 987:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 767:for being examples of some phenomenon 7: 2691:Thanks for your patience with me. -- 332:Category:Wikipedia_basic_information 3329:Formal mediation has been requested 1809:There is currently a discussion at 3448:Knowledge (XXG):Dispute resolution 3193:help form a consensus. Thank you! 3002:enough to have their own article. 2329:Roland Berger Strategy Consultants 1236:Commonwealth of Independent States 1124:deleted for any of several reasons 1111:Knowledge (XXG):Notability (music) 1100:because of the following concern: 725:Artificial intelligence in fiction 330:categorized as essays, once again 24: 3275:review the candidates' statements 1230:is the only land border that the 736:list of fictional child prodigies 115:page regarding faculty status at 2412: 2392:, where the discussion belongs. 1950:Polish League Against Defamation 1804: 1592:The Treasure Of The Sierra Madre 1197: 967: 29: 3677:is asking for participation in 3527:Pâté de Foie Gras (short story) 3499:is asking for participation in 3398:is asking for participation in 3219:is asking for participation in 3028:is asking for participation in 2990:Hi, I noticed that you created 2964:is asking for participation in 2886:is asking for participation in 2128:OK. I will look into it later. 1928:is asking for participation in 1895:is asking for participation in 1862:is asking for participation in 1713:is asking for participation in 1388:is asking for participation in 1355:is asking for participation in 1190:DYK for Lithuania–Poland border 628:Hi Staszek Lem. The reason for 3420:Request for mediation rejected 3281:. For the Election committee, 3251:Arbitration Committee election 3242:ArbCom elections are now open! 2752:Link to Polish Knowledge (XXG) 2351:09:48, 14 September 2015 (UTC) 2322:06:10, 14 September 2015 (UTC) 2267:18:47, 10 September 2015 (UTC) 1932:Talk:Genetically modified food 1919:Talk:Genetically modified food 1838:Arcus Consulting Group Toronto 1045:Knowledge (XXG):Article alerts 780:? - yes and this is verifiable 1: 3785:16:35, 17 December 2015 (UTC) 3755:15:17, 17 December 2015 (UTC) 3734:18:06, 17 December 2015 (UTC) 3720:15:17, 17 December 2015 (UTC) 3694:00:03, 16 December 2015 (UTC) 3661:15:07, 13 December 2015 (UTC) 3636:17:54, 12 December 2015 (UTC) 3453:For the Mediation Committee, 3415:00:01, 30 November 2015 (UTC) 3379:00:09, 28 November 2015 (UTC) 3322:06:21, 25 November 2015 (UTC) 3291:14:25, 24 November 2015 (UTC) 3236:00:01, 22 November 2015 (UTC) 3203:00:12, 21 November 2015 (UTC) 3172:00:05, 18 November 2015 (UTC) 3151:00:08, 18 November 2015 (UTC) 3124:19:44, 17 November 2015 (UTC) 3090:11:08, 17 November 2015 (UTC) 3045:00:01, 14 November 2015 (UTC) 3012:15:20, 13 November 2015 (UTC) 2298:All horses are the same color 2292:All horses are the same color 2206:08:12, 4 September 2015 (UTC) 2183:23:09, 1 September 2015 (UTC) 1649:User talk: Samuel Williscroft 1057:Quality and Importance Matrix 705:Knowledge (XXG):Autopatrolled 520:07:53, 27 February 2015 (UTC) 492:17:19, 26 February 2015 (UTC) 470:04:56, 26 February 2015 (UTC) 422:21:12, 26 February 2015 (UTC) 362:18:28, 26 February 2015 (UTC) 315:17:59, 26 February 2015 (UTC) 300:17:34, 26 February 2015 (UTC) 265:05:12, 26 February 2015 (UTC) 238:04:24, 26 February 2015 (UTC) 205:04:05, 26 February 2015 (UTC) 188:03:18, 26 February 2015 (UTC) 153:23:05, 25 February 2015 (UTC) 3679:this request for comment on 3612:19:21, 8 December 2015 (UTC) 3590:10:51, 8 December 2015 (UTC) 3561:10:17, 8 December 2015 (UTC) 3516:00:01, 8 December 2015 (UTC) 3501:this request for comment on 3469:20:54, 5 December 2015 (UTC) 3442:of the Committee, or to the 3428:request for formal mediation 3400:this request for comment on 3377:of the Mediation Committee. 3221:this request for comment on 3030:this request for comment on 2981:00:02, 6 November 2015 (UTC) 2966:this request for comment on 2948:10:00, 31 October 2015 (UTC) 2903:00:02, 29 October 2015 (UTC) 2888:this request for comment on 2865:18:14, 27 October 2015 (UTC) 2841:17:00, 27 October 2015 (UTC) 2816:16:56, 27 October 2015 (UTC) 2802:16:39, 27 October 2015 (UTC) 2766:16:35, 27 October 2015 (UTC) 2747:00:11, 27 October 2015 (UTC) 2701:15:56, 21 October 2015 (UTC) 2687:18:59, 20 October 2015 (UTC) 2672:18:36, 20 October 2015 (UTC) 2657:18:21, 20 October 2015 (UTC) 2637:18:21, 20 October 2015 (UTC) 2608:17:00, 20 October 2015 (UTC) 2587:16:35, 20 October 2015 (UTC) 2561:16:16, 20 October 2015 (UTC) 2545:03:02, 20 October 2015 (UTC) 2515:21:36, 19 October 2015 (UTC) 2497:20:41, 19 October 2015 (UTC) 2475:19:31, 19 October 2015 (UTC) 2461:16:14, 13 October 2015 (UTC) 2439:23:45, 12 October 2015 (UTC) 1930:this request for comment on 1897:this request for comment on 1864:this request for comment on 1715:this request for comment on 1392:Template talk:Aviation lists 1390:this request for comment on 1379:Template talk:Aviation lists 1357:this request for comment on 1081:Proposed deletion of Krëbane 224:. Dissipates attention. re: 130:14:44, 13 January 2015 (UTC) 3503:Talk:Florida State Road 997 3490:Talk:Florida State Road 997 3277:and submit your choices on 2402:18:13, 3 October 2015 (UTC) 2390:Talk:The Day of Six Billion 2376:18:06, 3 October 2015 (UTC) 2012:) 19:27, 2 July 2015 (UTC) 1168:allows discussion to reach 1149:{{proposed deletion/dated}} 1132:{{proposed deletion/dated}} 3800: 3283:MediaWiki message delivery 2890:Talk:Climate change denial 2877:Talk:Climate change denial 2288:18:50, 10 September 2015 2091:Template:Original_research 1322:17:33, 28 April 2015 (UTC) 1307:17:20, 28 April 2015 (UTC) 1284:08:42, 15 April 2015 (UTC) 1185:03:59, 14 April 2015 (UTC) 1160:exist. In particular, the 1076:03:11, 14 April 2015 (UTC) 1020:02:54, 14 April 2015 (UTC) 997:02:54, 14 April 2015 (UTC) 957:19:14, 13 April 2015 (UTC) 791:- yes and it is verifiable 678:01:21, 17 March 2015 (UTC) 652:00:39, 17 March 2015 (UTC) 619:20:05, 13 March 2015 (UTC) 169:reliable source about our 139:Question about the revert 3481:the Mediation Committee.) 3353:guide to formal mediation 2160:19:44, 28 July 2015 (UTC) 2144:Włodzisław Duch home page 2138:18:12, 28 July 2015 (UTC) 2123:14:14, 28 July 2015 (UTC) 2104:13:00, 28 July 2015 (UTC) 2085:12:23, 28 July 2015 (UTC) 2070:12:15, 28 July 2015 (UTC) 2055:12:03, 28 July 2015 (UTC) 1987:22:03, 25 June 2015 (UTC) 1965:20:59, 25 June 2015 (UTC) 1945:00:02, 23 June 2015 (UTC) 1912:00:03, 15 June 2015 (UTC) 1692:19:27, 15 June 2015 (UTC) 1577:that Knowledge (XXG) page 1477:Once again, referring to 1260:, and it may be added to 1154:proposed deletion process 973: 966: 907:21:26, 8 April 2015 (UTC) 867:20:12, 8 April 2015 (UTC) 849:19:44, 8 April 2015 (UTC) 816:19:29, 8 April 2015 (UTC) 752:02:59, 8 April 2015 (UTC) 719:00:44, 8 April 2015 (UTC) 591:Polish-Americans and Jews 582:21:38, 8 March 2015 (UTC) 566:21:34, 8 March 2015 (UTC) 545:21:31, 8 March 2015 (UTC) 3764:This user also complains 3708:???? verify by yourself 3675:feedback request service 3497:feedback request service 3396:feedback request service 3217:feedback request service 3026:feedback request service 2992:Polish school student ID 2962:feedback request service 2884:feedback request service 2215:Hi -- About the article 2030:18:43, 3 July 2015 (UTC) 1926:feedback request service 1893:feedback request service 1879:00:04, 7 June 2015 (UTC) 1860:feedback request service 1846:17:36, 6 June 2015 (UTC) 1824:17:39, 30 May 2015 (UTC) 1792:11:49, 30 May 2015 (UTC) 1763:11:47, 30 May 2015 (UTC) 1730:00:05, 30 May 2015 (UTC) 1711:feedback request service 1653:08:42, 30 May 2015 (UTC) 1645:User: Samuel Williscroft 1583:, the comment regarding 1547:21:56, 29 May 2015 (UTC) 1511:20:58, 29 May 2015 (UTC) 1491:20:52, 29 May 2015 (UTC) 1466:20:46, 29 May 2015 (UTC) 1451:20:13, 29 May 2015 (UTC) 1425:20:02, 29 May 2015 (UTC) 1405:00:03, 22 May 2015 (UTC) 1386:feedback request service 1372:00:02, 14 May 2015 (UTC) 1353:feedback request service 776:is "evil AI" is present 3349:formal mediation policy 2192:Dzień dobry. About the 1339:19:16, 7 May 2015 (UTC) 1227:Lithuania–Poland border 1218:Lithuania–Poland border 1141:the article's talk page 3436:mediation request page 3185: 2530:. And my focus of the 2357:Day of the Six Billion 1899:Talk:Year 2000 problem 1886:Talk:Year 2000 problem 1829:Add consulting firm to 1266:Did you know talk page 1109:and the more detailed 1089: 897:does not demand this. 692: 528:Dispute Resolution on 349:Encyclopedia Dramatica 226:"More info is helpful" 135::Core_content_policies 18:User talk:Lembit Staan 3365:Message delivered by 3255:Arbitration Committee 3184: 2198:Spiridon Ion Cepleanu 2039:Simulation hypothesis 1166:articles for deletion 1098:proposed for deletion 1088: 691: 684:Autopatrolled granted 42:of past discussions. 3549:opt-out instructions 3078:opt-out instructions 2936:opt-out instructions 2532:specific application 2528:without explanations 1575:I did not vandalise 1495:I already did that, 787:part of the plot of 376:No guess work pls . 3402:Talk:Wikipediocracy 3389:Talk:Wikipediocracy 3337:Mediation Committee 3259:arbitration process 2335:at the RBSC article 2217:Notification system 2211:Notification system 1581:21st Academy Awards 1262:the statistics page 701:new page patrollers 443:or its organization 222:opinions about them 3666:Please comment on 3539:• Join us at the 3488:Please comment on 3387:Please comment on 3271:arbitration policy 3208:Please comment on 3186: 3068:• Join us at the 3017:Please comment on 2953:Please comment on 2926:• Join us at the 2875:Please comment on 2148:pl:Włodzisław Duch 1917:Please comment on 1884:Please comment on 1851:Please comment on 1702:Please comment on 1684:Samuel Williscroft 1377:Please comment on 1344:Please comment on 1158:deletion processes 1090: 794:is "evil AI" from 693: 3544: 3482: 3381: 3325: 3308:comment added by 3122: 3095:Discussion report 3073: 2996:Polish student ID 2986:Polish student ID 2931: 2325: 2308:comment added by 1977:oki niema sprawy 1866:Talk:Supercarrier 1853:Talk:Supercarrier 1585:Humphrey Bogart's 1272: 1271: 1259: 1027: 1026: 878:I am not against 801:Is X.A.N.A. is a 95: 94: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 3791: 3657: 3601: 3582: 3534: 3472: 3465: 3459: 3364: 3324: 3302: 3135: 3119: 3114: 3112: 3063: 3032:Talk:Cold War II 3019:Talk:Cold War II 2968:Talk:OpenIndiana 2955:Talk:OpenIndiana 2921: 2826: 2791: 2785: 2777: 2618: 2571: 2525: 2485: 2450: 2416: 2387: 2324: 2310:Jordan Vrtanoski 2302: 2286: 2281: 2276: 2264: 2259: 2254: 2250:respectfully, -- 2075:przykrości ;).-- 2019: 1976: 1808: 1807: 1776: 1747: 1681: 1674: 1641: 1632: 1616:Alfred Hitchcock 1574: 1567: 1523: 1500: 1476: 1436: 1245: 1201: 1194: 1181: 1151: 1150: 1134: 1133: 1087: 1072: 1015: 993: 971: 964: 963: 953: 948: 942: 891: 885: 877: 874:NinjaRobotPirate 859:NinjaRobotPirate 841:NinjaRobotPirate 763: 760:NinjaRobotPirate 744:NinjaRobotPirate 717: 716: 714: 663: 633: 555: 516: 514: 481: 466: 464: 445: 407: 389: 385:Information page 383: 325: 215: 164: 73: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 3799: 3798: 3794: 3793: 3792: 3790: 3789: 3788: 3772:Aether theories 3762: 3741: 3701: 3671: 3659: 3655: 3643: 3620: 3595: 3580: 3568: 3541:DPL WikiProject 3523: 3493: 3485: 3484: 3463: 3455: 3451: 3422: 3392: 3384: 3383: 3360: 3331: 3303: 3279:the voting page 3245: 3213: 3195:Robert McClenon 3179: 3160: 3129: 3117: 3110: 3097: 3070:DPL WikiProject 3052: 3022: 2988: 2958: 2928:DPL WikiProject 2910: 2880: 2820: 2789: 2783: 2771: 2754: 2731: 2621:article subject 2612: 2565: 2519: 2479: 2444: 2429:. Thank you. -- 2419:objective prose 2410: 2381: 2360: 2331: 2303: 2294: 2284: 2279: 2274: 2262: 2257: 2252: 2213: 2190: 2175:NewbTopolis Rex 2170: 2042: 2013: 1997: 1970: 1952: 1922: 1889: 1856: 1831: 1817:. Thank you. 1805: 1802: 1772: 1743: 1739: 1707: 1675: 1668: 1635: 1626: 1604:Anthony Perkins 1568: 1561: 1517: 1496: 1470: 1430: 1412: 1382: 1349: 1330: 1291: 1192: 1183: 1179: 1162:speedy deletion 1148: 1147: 1131: 1130: 1085: 1083: 1074: 1070: 1061:Cleanup Listing 1032: 1023: 1017: 1013: 995: 991: 951: 946: 940: 921: 919:Cieszyn Silesia 889: 883: 871: 783:is "evil AI" a 757: 728: 712: 710: 708: 686: 657: 634:is because the 629: 626: 611:DemocraticLuntz 600:Polish American 593: 574:Robert McClenon 552:Robert McClenon 549: 537:Robert McClenon 533: 512: 510: 475: 462: 460: 440: 438: 401: 387: 381: 319: 209: 158: 137: 103: 69: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 3797: 3795: 3761: 3758: 3740: 3737: 3700: 3697: 3670: 3664: 3649: 3642: 3639: 3619: 3616: 3615: 3614: 3598:Basilicofresco 3581:Basilicofresco 3570:Hi, I noticed 3567: 3564: 3522: 3519: 3492: 3486: 3473:(Delivered by 3471: 3457:TransporterMan 3425: 3424: 3423: 3421: 3418: 3391: 3385: 3363: 3334: 3333: 3332: 3330: 3327: 3248: 3244: 3239: 3212: 3206: 3178: 3175: 3159: 3156: 3155: 3154: 3136:<shrug: --> 3096: 3093: 3051: 3048: 3021: 3015: 2987: 2984: 2957: 2951: 2909: 2906: 2879: 2873: 2872: 2871: 2870: 2869: 2868: 2867: 2848: 2847: 2846: 2845: 2844: 2843: 2753: 2750: 2739:SageGreenRider 2735:David L. Jones 2730: 2729:Done with Ronz 2727: 2726: 2725: 2724: 2723: 2722: 2721: 2720: 2719: 2718: 2717: 2716: 2715: 2714: 2713: 2712: 2711: 2710: 2709: 2708: 2707: 2706: 2705: 2704: 2703: 2639: 2596: 2592: 2502: 2409: 2408:David L. Jones 2406: 2405: 2404: 2359: 2354: 2330: 2327: 2293: 2290: 2212: 2209: 2189: 2186: 2173:like to know. 2169: 2166: 2165: 2164: 2163: 2162: 2152:Paweł Ł Zawada 2150:. Cheers :) -- 2115:Paweł Ł Zawada 2096:Paweł Ł Zawada 2077:213.158.218.48 2062:Paweł Ł Zawada 2047:Paweł Ł Zawada 2041: 2036: 2034: 1996: 1991: 1990: 1989: 1951: 1948: 1921: 1915: 1888: 1882: 1855: 1849: 1830: 1827: 1801: 1798: 1797: 1796: 1795: 1794: 1738: 1733: 1706: 1700: 1699: 1698: 1697: 1696: 1695: 1694: 1661: 1660: 1659: 1658: 1657: 1656: 1554: 1553: 1552: 1551: 1550: 1549: 1529:with that of " 1515: 1514: 1513: 1411: 1408: 1381: 1375: 1348: 1342: 1329: 1326: 1325: 1324: 1290: 1289:Reverting NACs 1287: 1270: 1269: 1202: 1191: 1188: 1173: 1172:for deletion. 1152:will stop the 1120: 1119: 1082: 1079: 1064: 1049:Article Alerts 1031: 1028: 1025: 1024: 1007: 1004: 1001: 1000: 985: 980: 979: 974: 972: 961: 920: 917: 916: 915: 914: 913: 912: 911: 910: 909: 869: 852: 851: 819: 818: 799: 792: 781: 727: 722: 685: 682: 681: 680: 625: 622: 592: 589: 587: 585: 584: 532: 526: 525: 524: 523: 522: 478:Starship.paint 437: 434: 433: 432: 431: 430: 429: 428: 427: 426: 425: 424: 374: 373: 372: 371: 370: 369: 368: 367: 366: 365: 364: 302: 136: 133: 102: 99: 97: 93: 92: 87: 84: 79: 74: 67: 62: 52: 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3796: 3787: 3786: 3782: 3778: 3775:assistance.-- 3773: 3769: 3766: 3760:Vespro Latuna 3759: 3757: 3756: 3752: 3748: 3747:Vespro Latuna 3744: 3738: 3736: 3735: 3731: 3727: 3722: 3721: 3717: 3713: 3712:Vespro Latuna 3709: 3706: 3705: 3698: 3696: 3695: 3691: 3687: 3683: 3682: 3681:Talk:Ayurveda 3676: 3669: 3668:Talk:Ayurveda 3665: 3663: 3662: 3658: 3652: 3647: 3640: 3638: 3637: 3633: 3629: 3625: 3617: 3613: 3609: 3605: 3599: 3594: 3593: 3592: 3591: 3587: 3583: 3577: 3573: 3565: 3563: 3562: 3558: 3554: 3550: 3545: 3542: 3538: 3532: 3528: 3520: 3518: 3517: 3513: 3509: 3505: 3504: 3498: 3491: 3487: 3483: 3480: 3476: 3470: 3466: 3460: 3458: 3449: 3445: 3441: 3437: 3433: 3429: 3419: 3417: 3416: 3412: 3408: 3404: 3403: 3397: 3390: 3386: 3382: 3380: 3376: 3372: 3368: 3358: 3354: 3350: 3346: 3342: 3338: 3328: 3326: 3323: 3319: 3315: 3311: 3307: 3299: 3298: 3293: 3292: 3288: 3284: 3280: 3276: 3272: 3268: 3264: 3260: 3256: 3252: 3243: 3240: 3238: 3237: 3233: 3229: 3225: 3224: 3218: 3211: 3207: 3205: 3204: 3200: 3196: 3191: 3183: 3176: 3174: 3173: 3169: 3165: 3157: 3152: 3148: 3144: 3140: 3133: 3128: 3127: 3126: 3125: 3120: 3113: 3107: 3102: 3101:Esquivalience 3094: 3092: 3091: 3087: 3083: 3079: 3074: 3071: 3067: 3061: 3057: 3049: 3047: 3046: 3042: 3038: 3034: 3033: 3027: 3020: 3016: 3014: 3013: 3009: 3005: 3001: 2997: 2993: 2985: 2983: 2982: 2978: 2974: 2970: 2969: 2963: 2956: 2952: 2950: 2949: 2945: 2941: 2937: 2932: 2929: 2925: 2919: 2915: 2907: 2905: 2904: 2900: 2896: 2892: 2891: 2885: 2878: 2874: 2866: 2862: 2858: 2854: 2853: 2852: 2851: 2850: 2849: 2842: 2838: 2834: 2830: 2824: 2819: 2818: 2817: 2813: 2809: 2805: 2804: 2803: 2799: 2795: 2788: 2781: 2775: 2770: 2769: 2768: 2767: 2763: 2759: 2751: 2749: 2748: 2744: 2740: 2736: 2728: 2702: 2698: 2694: 2690: 2689: 2688: 2684: 2680: 2675: 2674: 2673: 2669: 2665: 2660: 2659: 2658: 2654: 2650: 2645: 2640: 2638: 2634: 2630: 2626: 2622: 2616: 2611: 2610: 2609: 2605: 2601: 2597: 2593: 2590: 2589: 2588: 2584: 2580: 2576: 2569: 2564: 2563: 2562: 2558: 2554: 2550: 2548: 2547: 2546: 2542: 2538: 2533: 2529: 2523: 2518: 2517: 2516: 2512: 2508: 2503: 2500: 2499: 2498: 2494: 2490: 2483: 2478: 2477: 2476: 2472: 2468: 2464: 2463: 2462: 2458: 2454: 2448: 2443: 2442: 2441: 2440: 2436: 2432: 2428: 2424: 2420: 2415: 2407: 2403: 2399: 2395: 2391: 2385: 2380: 2379: 2378: 2377: 2373: 2369: 2366:. Thank you. 2365: 2358: 2355: 2353: 2352: 2348: 2344: 2340: 2336: 2328: 2326: 2323: 2319: 2315: 2311: 2307: 2299: 2291: 2289: 2287: 2282: 2277: 2269: 2268: 2265: 2260: 2255: 2248: 2244: 2242: 2237: 2235: 2229: 2225: 2222: 2218: 2210: 2208: 2207: 2203: 2199: 2195: 2187: 2185: 2184: 2180: 2176: 2167: 2161: 2157: 2153: 2149: 2146:(in Polish), 2145: 2141: 2140: 2139: 2135: 2131: 2127: 2126: 2125: 2124: 2120: 2116: 2112: 2111:Fringe theory 2106: 2105: 2101: 2097: 2092: 2087: 2086: 2082: 2078: 2072: 2071: 2067: 2063: 2057: 2056: 2052: 2048: 2040: 2037: 2035: 2032: 2031: 2027: 2023: 2017: 2011: 2007: 2003: 1995: 1992: 1988: 1984: 1980: 1974: 1969: 1968: 1967: 1966: 1962: 1958: 1949: 1947: 1946: 1942: 1938: 1934: 1933: 1927: 1920: 1916: 1914: 1913: 1909: 1905: 1901: 1900: 1894: 1887: 1883: 1881: 1880: 1876: 1872: 1868: 1867: 1861: 1854: 1850: 1848: 1847: 1843: 1839: 1836: 1828: 1826: 1825: 1822: 1820: 1816: 1812: 1799: 1793: 1789: 1785: 1781: 1777: 1775: 1769: 1768: 1767: 1766: 1765: 1764: 1760: 1756: 1752: 1748: 1746: 1737: 1734: 1732: 1731: 1727: 1723: 1719: 1718: 1712: 1705: 1701: 1693: 1689: 1685: 1679: 1672: 1667: 1666: 1665: 1664: 1663: 1662: 1654: 1650: 1646: 1639: 1630: 1624: 1623: 1617: 1613: 1609: 1608:James Stewart 1605: 1601: 1597: 1593: 1589: 1586: 1582: 1578: 1572: 1565: 1560: 1559: 1558: 1557: 1556: 1555: 1548: 1544: 1540: 1536: 1532: 1528: 1521: 1516: 1512: 1508: 1504: 1499: 1494: 1493: 1492: 1488: 1484: 1480: 1474: 1469: 1468: 1467: 1463: 1459: 1454: 1453: 1452: 1448: 1444: 1440: 1434: 1429: 1428: 1427: 1426: 1422: 1418: 1410:How to do it. 1409: 1407: 1406: 1402: 1398: 1394: 1393: 1387: 1380: 1376: 1374: 1373: 1369: 1365: 1361: 1360: 1354: 1347: 1343: 1341: 1340: 1337: 1336: 1327: 1323: 1319: 1315: 1311: 1310: 1309: 1308: 1304: 1300: 1296: 1288: 1286: 1285: 1281: 1277: 1267: 1263: 1257: 1253: 1249: 1243: 1239: 1237: 1233: 1232:Baltic States 1229: 1228: 1224:... that the 1221: 1220: 1219: 1213: 1212: 1207: 1206:15 April 2015 1203: 1200: 1196: 1195: 1189: 1187: 1186: 1182: 1176: 1171: 1167: 1163: 1159: 1155: 1144: 1142: 1138: 1127: 1125: 1118: 1116: 1112: 1108: 1103: 1102: 1101: 1099: 1095: 1080: 1078: 1077: 1073: 1067: 1062: 1058: 1054: 1053:Popular Pages 1050: 1046: 1041: 1037: 1036:Zbrzyca River 1029: 1022: 1021: 1016: 1010: 1003: 1002: 999: 998: 994: 988: 982: 981: 978: 975: 970: 965: 962: 959: 958: 954: 949: 943: 937: 933: 929: 924: 918: 908: 904: 900: 896: 888: 881: 875: 870: 868: 864: 860: 856: 855: 854: 853: 850: 846: 842: 838: 833: 828: 823: 822: 821: 820: 817: 813: 809: 804: 800: 797: 793: 790: 786: 782: 779: 775: 774: 772: 768: 761: 756: 755: 754: 753: 749: 745: 741: 737: 733: 726: 723: 721: 720: 715: 706: 702: 698: 690: 683: 679: 675: 671: 667: 661: 656: 655: 654: 653: 649: 645: 641: 637: 632: 623: 621: 620: 616: 612: 608: 605: 601: 596: 590: 588: 583: 579: 575: 570: 569: 568: 567: 563: 559: 553: 547: 546: 542: 538: 531: 530:Psychometrics 527: 521: 518: 517: 507: 506: 502: 501: 496: 495: 493: 489: 485: 479: 474: 473: 472: 471: 468: 467: 457: 456: 452: 451: 444: 435: 423: 419: 415: 411: 405: 400: 399: 397: 393: 386: 379: 375: 363: 359: 355: 351: 350: 345: 341: 337: 333: 329: 323: 318: 317: 316: 312: 308: 303: 301: 297: 293: 288: 284: 280: 276: 272: 268: 267: 266: 262: 258: 253: 249: 245: 244: 243: 242: 241: 240: 239: 235: 231: 227: 223: 219: 213: 208: 207: 206: 202: 198: 193: 192: 191: 190: 189: 185: 181: 177: 172: 168: 162: 157: 156: 155: 154: 150: 146: 142: 134: 132: 131: 127: 123: 122:Quartermaster 118: 114: 113:Peter Swirski 109: 108: 100: 98: 91: 88: 85: 83: 80: 78: 75: 72: 68: 66: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 3777:Anders Feder 3763: 3745: 3742: 3739:Extropianism 3723: 3710: 3707: 3702: 3699:Ashen Lights 3680: 3672: 3644: 3621: 3569: 3546: 3524: 3502: 3494: 3479:on behalf of 3475:MediationBot 3456: 3452: 3444:mailing list 3401: 3393: 3367:MediationBot 3361: 3356: 3345:request page 3304:— Preceding 3300: 3294: 3246: 3222: 3214: 3187: 3161: 3138: 3105: 3098: 3075: 3053: 3031: 3023: 2989: 2967: 2959: 2933: 2911: 2889: 2881: 2755: 2732: 2643: 2624: 2620: 2574: 2531: 2527: 2422: 2411: 2361: 2332: 2304:— Preceding 2295: 2270: 2249: 2245: 2238: 2230: 2226: 2214: 2191: 2188:Historic map 2171: 2107: 2088: 2073: 2058: 2043: 2033: 1998: 1973:Micha.kkvs2k 1957:Micha.kkvs2k 1953: 1931: 1923: 1898: 1890: 1865: 1857: 1832: 1803: 1773: 1744: 1740: 1716: 1708: 1621: 1620: 1413: 1391: 1383: 1358: 1350: 1334: 1331: 1292: 1273: 1256:daily totals 1225: 1223: 1216: 1215: 1211:Did you know 1209: 1156:, but other 1145: 1137:edit summary 1128: 1121: 1117:. Thank you, 1115:ping me back 1104: 1092:The article 1091: 1033: 1005: 984: 976: 960: 922: 826: 802: 784: 766: 729: 694: 627: 609: 603: 597: 594: 586: 548: 534: 508: 504: 499: 458: 454: 449: 442: 439: 347: 343: 339: 327: 270: 225: 221: 217: 170: 166: 138: 110: 104: 96: 70: 43: 37: 3726:Staszek Lem 3604:Staszek Lem 3531:Heavy-metal 3143:Staszek Lem 2914:Maciejowski 2833:Staszek Lem 2794:Staszek Lem 2679:Staszek Lem 2649:Staszek Lem 2629:Staszek Lem 2579:Staszek Lem 2537:Staszek Lem 2489:Staszek Lem 2453:Staszek Lem 2394:Staszek Lem 2130:Staszek Lem 2022:Staszek Lem 1979:Staszek Lem 1671:Staszek Lem 1629:Staszek Lem 1588:performance 1564:Staszek Lem 1539:Staszek Lem 1483:Staszek Lem 1443:Staszek Lem 1314:Staszek Lem 1276:Crisco 1492 899:Staszek Lem 808:Staszek Lem 713:MusikAnimal 670:Staszek Lem 558:Staszek Lem 484:Staszek Lem 414:Staszek Lem 354:Staszek Lem 292:Staszek Lem 230:Staszek Lem 180:Staszek Lem 36:This is an 3656:reply here 3551:. Thanks, 3351:, and the 3267:topic bans 3080:. Thanks, 3004:nyuszika7h 2938:. Thanks, 2829:edit count 2016:Ricky81682 2006:Ricky81682 1800:ANI Thread 1252:live views 1248:here's how 1180:reply here 1071:reply here 1040:assessment 1014:reply here 992:reply here 827:The Hobbit 796:Code Lyoko 789:Code Lyoko 778:Code Lyoko 3770:from the 3624:eliticide 3618:Eliticide 3572:this edit 3535:Read the 3341:Mediation 3310:SamirAmis 3301:thanks. 3263:site bans 3064:Read the 3060:Franchise 2922:Read the 2857:Woogie10w 2823:Woogie10w 2808:Woogie10w 2774:Woogie10w 2758:Woogie10w 2644:declaring 2343:GermanJoe 1774:Doc James 1745:Doc James 1612:Kim Novak 1335:Calvin999 1170:consensus 1096:has been 880:WP:BURDEN 832:WP:BURDEN 732:WP:BURDEN 631:this edit 410:WP:PGLIFE 378:WP:PGLIFE 220:, not to 218:our rules 90:Archive 9 82:Archive 5 77:Archive 4 71:Archive 3 65:Archive 2 60:Archive 1 3641:Seems ok 3628:Potočnik 3440:Chairman 3432:declined 3318:contribs 3306:unsigned 3164:DreamGuy 3132:Gamaliel 3111:Gamaliel 3106:Signpost 2918:Maciejów 2384:Asarelah 2368:Asarelah 2318:contribs 2306:unsigned 2094:more).-- 1784:contribs 1755:contribs 1525:article 1498:at 19:40 1479:this one 1439:this one 1059:and the 500:starship 450:starship 287:WP:CCPOL 285:and nor 279:WP:About 275:WP:CCPOL 248:WP:About 176:WP:UNDUE 3686:Legobot 3553:DPL bot 3508:Legobot 3407:Legobot 3228:Legobot 3082:DPL bot 3056:Groszek 3037:Legobot 3000:notable 2973:Legobot 2940:DPL bot 2895:Legobot 2625:alleged 2595:source. 2168:Cladida 2002:WP:NPOV 1937:Legobot 1904:Legobot 1871:Legobot 1736:WP:LEAD 1722:Legobot 1678:Diannaa 1638:Diannaa 1600:Vertigo 1571:Diannaa 1535:or duty 1520:Diannaa 1503:Diannaa 1473:Diannaa 1458:Diannaa 1433:Diannaa 1417:Diannaa 1397:Legobot 1364:Legobot 1295:WP:NACD 1094:Krëbane 803:notable 785:notable 660:Diannaa 644:Diannaa 171:current 39:archive 3375:behalf 3347:, the 3253:. The 3158:Thanks 2339:WP:RSN 2241:wp:BRD 2234:wp:DPL 2221:wp:AFD 1596:Psycho 1531:Polack 1299:Alakzi 1139:or on 925:-: --> 769:, per 505:.paint 455:.paint 446:-: --> 340:do not 334:is in 283:WP:HOW 281:, nor 252:WP:HOW 3373:) on 2831::-). 2020:yep. 1788:email 1759:email 1527:Poles 1501:. -- 1328:Hello 697:added 436:Query 271:about 105:See: 16:< 3781:talk 3751:talk 3730:talk 3716:talk 3690:talk 3684:. 3673:The 3648:. -- 3632:talk 3608:talk 3557:talk 3512:talk 3506:. 3495:The 3464:TALK 3426:The 3411:talk 3405:. 3394:The 3371:talk 3335:The 3314:talk 3287:talk 3232:talk 3226:. 3215:The 3199:talk 3168:talk 3147:talk 3118:talk 3086:talk 3041:talk 3035:. 3024:The 3008:talk 2994:and 2977:talk 2971:. 2960:The 2944:talk 2899:talk 2893:. 2882:The 2861:talk 2837:talk 2812:talk 2798:talk 2780:RTFM 2762:talk 2743:talk 2697:talk 2693:Ronz 2683:talk 2668:talk 2664:Ronz 2653:talk 2633:talk 2615:Ronz 2604:talk 2600:Ronz 2583:talk 2568:Ronz 2557:talk 2553:Ronz 2541:talk 2522:Ronz 2511:talk 2507:Ronz 2493:talk 2482:Ronz 2471:talk 2467:Ronz 2457:talk 2447:Ronz 2435:talk 2431:Ronz 2398:talk 2372:talk 2347:talk 2314:talk 2202:talk 2179:talk 2156:talk 2134:talk 2119:talk 2100:talk 2081:talk 2066:talk 2051:talk 2026:talk 2010:talk 1983:talk 1961:talk 1941:talk 1935:. 1924:The 1908:talk 1902:. 1891:The 1875:talk 1869:. 1858:The 1842:talk 1780:talk 1751:talk 1726:talk 1720:. 1709:The 1688:talk 1614:and 1610:and 1606:and 1602:and 1543:talk 1507:talk 1487:talk 1462:talk 1447:talk 1421:talk 1401:talk 1395:. 1384:The 1368:talk 1362:. 1351:The 1318:talk 1312:Ok. 1303:talk 1293:Per 1280:talk 903:talk 895:WP:V 863:talk 845:talk 837:WP:V 812:talk 771:WP:V 748:talk 674:talk 648:talk 615:talk 578:talk 562:talk 541:talk 488:talk 418:talk 404:Moxy 396:talk 392:Moxy 358:talk 322:Moxy 311:talk 307:Moxy 296:talk 261:talk 257:Moxy 234:talk 212:Moxy 201:talk 197:Moxy 184:talk 161:Moxy 149:talk 145:Moxy 141:here 126:talk 117:UMSL 3586:msg 3578:-- 3566:Dag 3537:FAQ 3247:Hi, 3066:FAQ 2924:FAQ 2787:ill 2575:you 2280:ncr 2258:ncr 2194:map 1819:DES 1622:too 1590:in 1456:-- 1204:On 1018:on 938:_T_ 740:due 604:not 513:Olé 511:~ ¡ 463:Olé 461:~ ¡ 328:not 250:or 167:not 3783:) 3753:) 3732:) 3718:) 3692:) 3634:) 3610:) 3588:) 3559:) 3514:) 3477:, 3467:) 3450:. 3413:) 3355:, 3320:) 3316:• 3289:) 3265:, 3234:) 3201:) 3170:) 3153:}} 3149:) 3139:my 3088:) 3043:) 3010:) 2979:) 2946:) 2901:) 2863:) 2839:) 2814:) 2800:) 2792:. 2790:}} 2784:{{ 2764:) 2745:) 2699:) 2685:) 2670:) 2655:) 2635:) 2606:) 2585:) 2559:) 2543:) 2513:) 2505:-- 2495:) 2473:) 2459:) 2437:) 2423:is 2400:) 2374:) 2349:) 2320:) 2316:• 2285:am 2275:do 2272:-- 2263:am 2253:do 2204:) 2181:) 2158:) 2136:) 2121:) 2113:-- 2102:) 2083:) 2068:) 2053:) 2028:) 1985:) 1963:) 1943:) 1910:) 1877:) 1844:) 1790:) 1786:· 1782:· 1761:) 1757:· 1753:· 1728:) 1690:) 1651:) 1598:, 1545:) 1509:) 1489:) 1464:) 1449:) 1441:. 1423:) 1403:) 1370:) 1320:) 1305:) 1282:) 1274:— 1254:, 1250:, 1208:, 1143:. 1126:. 1055:, 1051:, 955:) 930:, 905:) 890:}} 887:cn 884:{{ 865:) 847:) 814:) 750:) 709:— 676:) 650:) 617:) 580:) 564:) 543:) 494:\ 490:) 420:) 398:) 388:}} 382:{{ 380:- 360:) 313:) 298:) 263:) 236:) 203:) 186:) 151:) 128:) 86:→ 3779:( 3749:( 3728:( 3714:( 3688:( 3653:| 3630:( 3606:( 3600:: 3596:@ 3584:( 3555:( 3543:. 3510:( 3461:( 3409:( 3369:( 3312:( 3285:( 3230:( 3197:( 3166:( 3145:( 3134:: 3130:@ 3121:) 3115:( 3084:( 3072:. 3039:( 3006:( 2975:( 2942:( 2930:. 2897:( 2859:( 2835:( 2825:: 2821:@ 2810:( 2796:( 2776:: 2772:@ 2760:( 2741:( 2695:( 2681:( 2666:( 2651:( 2631:( 2617:: 2613:@ 2602:( 2581:( 2570:: 2566:@ 2555:( 2539:( 2524:: 2520:@ 2509:( 2491:( 2484:: 2480:@ 2469:( 2455:( 2449:: 2445:@ 2433:( 2396:( 2386:: 2382:@ 2370:( 2345:( 2312:( 2200:( 2177:( 2154:( 2132:( 2117:( 2098:( 2079:( 2064:( 2049:( 2024:( 2018:: 2014:@ 2008:( 1981:( 1975:: 1971:@ 1959:( 1939:( 1906:( 1873:( 1840:( 1778:( 1749:( 1724:( 1686:( 1680:: 1676:@ 1673:: 1669:@ 1655:. 1647:( 1640:: 1636:@ 1631:: 1627:@ 1573:: 1569:@ 1566:: 1562:@ 1541:( 1522:: 1518:@ 1505:( 1485:( 1475:: 1471:@ 1460:( 1445:( 1435:: 1431:@ 1419:( 1399:( 1366:( 1316:( 1301:( 1278:( 1268:. 1258:) 1246:( 1238:? 1177:| 1068:| 1011:| 989:| 952:L 947:P 944:( 941:G 936:D 901:( 876:: 872:@ 861:( 843:( 810:( 762:: 758:@ 746:( 672:( 662:: 658:@ 646:( 613:( 576:( 560:( 554:: 550:@ 539:( 515:! 486:( 480:: 476:@ 465:! 416:( 406:: 402:@ 394:( 356:( 324:: 320:@ 309:( 294:( 259:( 232:( 214:: 210:@ 199:( 182:( 163:: 159:@ 147:( 124:( 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index