278:
119:"—this is not just about in-universe (character, in-universe-places) articles, but also about the works themselves (in this instance video games). When citing "no hits on Google" I referred to the absence of reliable sources on Google; of course the games are mentioned on a lot of pages, but that's not enough to assert notability per
203:
Hi there, LeaW. I've noticed your name quite a few times as nominator in the AfD circle. What seems strange to me is how infrequently your noms gather any comments for delete or for keep. I checked through your contribs and noticed that you've recently been spending a large portion of your time in
50:
All geographical articles whether it is towns or mountains etc are inherently notable. The problem is often accessing enough information to expand them into decent articles but because they are sub stubs doesn't mean they should be deleted. I'm sure you've noticed that there are many such articles on
147:
It seems that you haven't checked the hits at all. For these articles, try looking at gamespot, Ign, rotten tomatoes and game rankings. GA and FA class game articles are usually ref'd by these sites. If you want to make your afd's stronger, try proving that there are no reviews on these sites for
73:
These are games. WP:FICT applies to things inside works of fiction not the works of fiction themselves. and there are google hits for these games. Please read the appropriate guidelines carefully and actually search Google before citing "no hits on Google" before actually using them. Don't be
242:
article. I began the article a while back and did copy/paste about one paragraph from another
Knowledge (XXG) article to "get the ball rolling" on the article. I did not realize taht this was not within the rules. The redirect, though, would be more appropriately pointed to
208:, and perhaps focus on commenting on a few as a participant instead of a nominator? Most of your AfDs from earlier this month, right or wrong, will end up relisted for lack of participation. I don't fault you for that, just a curiousity most likely.
333:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
140:
Knowledge (XXG):Notability (fiction) covers the notability of characters, items, places, and other elements (including individual episodes of serialized works such as television or comic book series)
292:
44:
251:- the former is direclty related and even has a small section about the topic. Thanks for your explaination of why you changed/deleted it. -cmsmith81 --
148:
these articles. I usually cite the lack of reviews in these articles as violation of WP:RS, WP:V and WP:N which trumps any specialized guidelines.--
239:
358:
75:
91:
244:
354:
188:
345:
describes the
Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
288:
350:
105:. Such articles should be structured around the demonstrated notability for the topic, with an appropriate
52:
248:
176:
346:
322:
313:
173:
Hi, I responded to your remark about this article being removed. Looking forward to your feedback.
291:. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at
256:
167:
342:
326:
106:
215:
124:
284:
270:
184:
32:
338:
330:
205:
204:
AfD (almost exclusive). As an AfD closer, I recommend you slow down on the nominations (see
120:
110:
303:
341:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
334:
266:
102:
252:
98:
221:
209:
149:
79:
180:
27:
299:
277:
329:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
Knowledge (XXG)
97:
Articles dealing with a work of fiction should demonstrate real-world
298:
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.
362:
307:
260:
228:
192:
154:
132:
84:
63:
38:
117:
a book, movie, television series, video game, or other medium
293:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Cerro del
Quinceo
210:
74:
irresponsible with your noms. It will make you look
283:An article that you have been involved in editing,
24:Sorry fgor beeing late, have fixed that bug now :)
321:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
45:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Alakamisy
216:
144:. Games aren't covered by this proposed policy
8:
240:social constructivism (learning theory)
90:I disagree: Following the nutshell on
7:
92:Knowledge (XXG):Notability (fiction)
14:
347:review the candidates' statements
238:Thanks for your work/help on the
276:
245:constructivism (learning theory)
222:
353:. For the Election committee,
323:Arbitration Committee election
314:ArbCom elections are now open!
115:where a "work of fiction" is "
1:
363:13:47, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
229:23:36, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
193:10:04, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
155:23:44, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
133:23:31, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
85:23:25, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
64:22:27, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
39:13:17, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
349:and submit your choices on
378:
355:MediaWiki message delivery
308:17:39, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
261:10:54, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
142:within a work of fiction
111:in-universe information
287:, has been listed for
114:
327:Arbitration Committee
249:social construcionism
95:
69:Daisenryaku et al Afd
199:Your AfD nominations
137:Read the fine print:
57:♦ King of Baldness ♦
331:arbitration process
343:arbitration policy
285:Cerro del Quinceo
271:Cerro del Quinceo
225:
195:
179:comment added by
369:
280:
226:
223:
218:
212:
174:
152:
103:reliable sources
82:
61:
60:
35:
30:
377:
376:
372:
371:
370:
368:
367:
366:
351:the voting page
317:
281:
274:
236:
201:
171:
150:
80:
71:
54:
53:
48:
37:
33:
28:
22:
20:twinkle problem
12:
11:
5:
375:
373:
320:
316:
311:
275:
273:
269:nomination of
264:
235:
232:
200:
197:
170:
164:
162:
160:
159:
158:
157:
145:
138:
70:
67:
47:
42:
25:
21:
18:
16:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
374:
365:
364:
360:
356:
352:
348:
344:
340:
336:
332:
328:
324:
315:
312:
310:
309:
305:
301:
296:
295:. Thank you.
294:
290:
286:
279:
272:
268:
265:
263:
262:
258:
254:
250:
246:
241:
233:
231:
230:
227:
219:
213:
207:
198:
196:
194:
190:
186:
182:
178:
169:
168:Disk Firewall
165:
163:
156:
153:
146:
143:
139:
136:
135:
134:
130:
126:
122:
118:
113:
112:
108:
104:
100:
93:
89:
88:
87:
86:
83:
77:
68:
66:
65:
62:
59:
58:
46:
43:
41:
40:
36:
31:
19:
17:
318:
297:
282:
247:rather than
237:
202:
172:
161:
141:
128:
116:
96:
72:
56:
55:
49:
23:
15:
175:—Preceding
339:topic bans
224:Disclaimer
99:notability
51:wikipedia
335:site bans
253:Cmsmith81
289:deletion
189:contribs
177:unsigned
151:Lenticel
81:Lenticel
206:WP:TIND
181:Gr8dude
121:WP:FICT
107:balance
325:. The
300:RDBury
234:Thanks
211:Keeper
166:AfD,
123:. --
101:from
359:talk
304:talk
257:talk
185:talk
129:talk
34:Toth
319:Hi,
267:AfD
220:|
214:|
125:Lea
109:of
78:.--
76:bad
29:Aza
361:)
337:,
306:)
259:)
217:76
191:)
187:•
131:)
94:,
357:(
302:(
255:(
183:(
127:(
26:→
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.