267:
add a great flavor to the show - and everyone should be able to have
Knowledge (XXG) as a resource for those, don't you think? I suggest then to let information that is not erroneous and serves the progress of theories discussion around the plot of Lost, exist in the article. Otherwise "superfluous" information like that wouldn't be in the show! I find it strange how one book is mentioned and the other is not. They are both seen in 203, both serve no purpose yet only one is mentioned. And FYI, just because this account is new doesn't mean that I'm new at Knowledge (XXG) too ;) It's just my real name.
479:
Could you explain why you see the need to excise
Christian Shepard, & Shannon Rutherford from the character section. It is not original research, and the source of their name's is just as evident as the other names. In addition, had you read the comment assosciated with Gary Troup, you would have
266:
Hello
Leflyman, thanks for the heads up at the Lost section. I'm not arguing about removing my thoughts, it has happened before, it will happen again, both to me and others by me. I just think that every piece of information should be written in Knowledge (XXG), especially the most trivial ones that
88:
does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion. It is not a redirect. It is a disambiguation page. Even if it were a redirect, it still would not meet the criteria because it has "useful history". "No useful history" usually refers to a redirect that has maybe 2 or 3 edits (usually being minor). This
376:
I don't have enough knowledge of the subject to judge content disputes (the IP was originally blatantly vandalizing the article, but switched to its current contributions after I placed the warning), but I left a 3RR warning at the IP's talk page, and told them to discuss any future additions on the
236:
To exemplify the flawed reasoning you have used, an equal counter-argument ad hominem could claim that the article you wrote is false because of your religious intolerance. It is clear to see that this argument is extraneous, in that it has not concentrated on the content of the article in question
111:
The article now at "Lost (2004 television series)" was started on 20:16, 21 September 2004 (at "Lost (television drama)", I think, and moved from there to "Lost (ABC TV series", and thence to the current location). A duplicate article had been started on 04:00, 23 August 2004 at "Lost (TV series)",
65:
entry already existed as a redirect page. In addition, there's the context of the show itself. Kate is addressed as "Miss Ryan" by the manager of a bank she's helping to rob. The "Austin" surname is from the time capsule tape she made in her early teens. I don't know for sure, but it seems more
529:
I like your proposal for
Knowledge (XXG) is not a fansite, and I also now concur with your assessment of the Story Elements section on the main series page (and feel that the Characters page needs a major reworking). The story elements section has apparently become an excuse for anyone to offer up
135:
PS: I don't usually check other User_talk: pages (so that I don't have to monitor a whole long list of User_Talk: pages - one for each person with whom I am having a "conversation"), so please leave any messages for me on my talk page (above); if you leave a message for me here I probably will not
232:
on the aforementioned talk page. To summarise: ad hominem is a logical fallacy that involves replying to an argument or assertion by addressing the person presenting the argument or assertion rather than the argument itself (additionally, argumentum ad nauseam is the false proof of a statement by
172:, considering better than 90% of my edits are in and around those pages! Although, in all honesty, you deserve one for your dedication and hard work on these pages too. In fact, if it weren't for your prodding, I might have continued my extended vacation. I say you deserve one too! :)
73:
Yes, it probably would be a good idea to take it to the talk page, rather than make a snap decision now. There is the possibility that since "Born to Run" was one of the last episodes in season 1, the show publicity just hasn't caught up yet. The Ryan/Austin issue is worth
499:
Talk page. There hasn't been a 3RR rule break yet, so I'm not sure what can be done besides alerting an admin, but I'm particularly annoyed that this person changes the warning every time he posts his "theory" so he can claim he doesn't know why we're removing his stuff.
329:
Unbehagen is now no longer objecting to the paragraph based on a claim of "original research", but now is insisting that he needs citations, ignoring the many citation on the Talk: page. Would you mind taking another look?
276:
Hi
Leflyman. I should have posted on the discussion page before I posted on the article. Is there a place on Knowledge (XXG) tracking the number references in the show? Or possible therories as to their significance?
513:
Beat me to the punch on the 3RR. He managed to slip in another change before being blocked, but I reverted it (giving me 2 today, so I'm done for now). I've also added a comment to the top of the Talk page for
237:
to determine the claim of falsehood. Additionally, I have no accurate way of judging your stance on the subject, so the implication therein is insubstantial as well as being grossly impertinent.
136:
see it. I know not everyone uses this style (they would rather keep all the text of a thread in one place), but I simply can't monitor all the User_talk: pages I leave messages on. Thanks!
480:
paid attention to it. If he is included in the Lost in Other Media section, he can be included in the character names, as his name does for purgatory when rearranged.
530:
their own perceived elements, and it probably needs to go. Question is, how can we make it gone without having an edit war erupt? A vote on the talk pages perhaps?
339:
Yes, his focus is extremely narrow, his knowledge of the techniques of reverting is impressive, and his references to policy are copious - all very suspicious.
358:
518:, which gathers all the policy/guideline links we keep having to point to in one handy spot at the top of the page. Let me know if you think any are missing.
417:
401:
495:
Hey, Leflyman. Just wanted to drop you a note letting you know that I've posted a brief overview of our problems with the Fan
Speculation section at
40:
66:
likely that she would use her real name on the earlier occasion, rather than when she was already a wanted fugitive. (14:34, 9 September 2005
446:. If we protect that template, no one will be able to add info about future episodes except admin! Do you agree with this plan? Thanks. —
104:
145:
435:
439:
416:
Just now got around to adding my comments as well. Strong support; thanks for proposing this. An odd discussion ensued on
244:
will benefit greatly from mutual respect as well as a level of comprimise from both sides. I hope you agree. Sincerely
443:
47:
209:
which make accusations about my fitness to edit. I am happy to recieve criticism, but please do so on my talk page.
268:
168:
Thank you for the barnstar... my first. I guess if, at this point, if I was going to earn one, it has to be for
503:
If I said that this is exactly why I never wanted this section in the first place, would you be surprised? :)
255:
389:
377:
talk page. If they insert the same material again, I (or another admin) should block them for 24 hours.
295:
245:
447:
496:
89:
one was an actual article prior to be changed to a redirect, and then finally a disambiguation page.
241:
210:
206:
465:
Outstanding. I learn something new about
Knowledge (XXG) every few days, it seems. Great idea.
380:
36:
28:
17:
158:
I'm still enough of a
Wikinewbie that getting a barnstar puts a big grin on my face. Thanks! —
309:
288:
159:
149:
85:
225:
407:
I've added my comments to your proposal. Great idea, by the way. I'm glad you posted it.
315:
Sup, thanks for fighting the good fight. Wiki-dhimmi's can be darn obnoxious sometimes.
214:
90:
531:
519:
504:
481:
408:
363:
316:
278:
182:
173:
127:
534:
522:
507:
469:
461:
424:
411:
394:
366:
343:
334:
319:
302:
281:
271:
248:
194:
185:
176:
162:
130:
93:
299:
191:
75:
67:
62:
340:
331:
229:
221:
466:
421:
144:
124:
27:
DO NOT EDIT OR POST REPLIES TO THIS PAGE. THIS PAGE IS AN ARCHIVE OF MY
143:
120:
gives the impression it was a simple cut-n-paste, but it wasn't).
298:
page. Can you check there and clarify your concern? Thanks.
39:, copying the section you are replying to if necessary. (See
349:
Sounds like Yuber/Alburuni to me. Could someone investigate?
112:
and at 18:52, 5 November 2004 that second article was
359:Knowledge (XXG):Requests for adminship/Ramallite
240:I think that the resolution of the dispute at
205:Hi. You have written a number of comments on
8:
440:Template:Episodes of Lost (Season 2) Table
41:Knowledge (XXG):How to archive a talk page
436:Talk:Episodes of Lost (Season 2)#Sources
148:In recognition of excellence in editing
256:User_talk:Spooky_Donkey#Pseudoreligion
213:is for the discussion of the article
7:
438:) I just created a new template,
105:Talk:Lost (2004 television series)
24:
116:into the first one (your comment
61:As to the character of Kate, the
58:Thank you for the encouragement
103:In case you didn't see this at
354:RfA you might be interested in
177:21:28, 28 September 2005 (UTC)
163:20:55, 28 September 2005 (UTC)
131:15:03, 27 September 2005 (UTC)
94:06:23, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
1:
535:18:19, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
523:18:31, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
508:16:09, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
425:00:58, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
412:03:16, 22 November 2005 (UTC)
395:22:38, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
470:00:00, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
462:22:23, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
367:02:39, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
344:05:01, 30 October 2005 (UTC)
335:00:37, 30 October 2005 (UTC)
320:09:09, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
303:05:09, 14 October 2005 (UTC)
282:15:39, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
272:09:26, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
249:16:12, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
195:22:06, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
186:21:41, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
444:Episodes of Lost (Season 2)
442:, and put it at the top of
220:I have directed you toward
54:Lost character reformatting
48:User_talk:Leflyman/Archive3
46:Next archival selection is
551:
233:(prolonged) repetition).
140:Thanks for the barnstar!
420:, though, I felt... --
254:Extensive response at
224:as you have used this
181:YAY! Thank you!!! :)
152:
296:Talk:Silver RavenWolf
147:
226:logically fallacious
118:move all the content
294:I responded at the
242:Talk:Pseudoreligion
211:Talk:Pseudoreligion
207:Talk:Pseudoreligion
35:Post replies to my
372:Shannon Rutherford
153:
18:User talk:Leflyman
459:
453:
325:Zionist terrorism
310:Zionist Terrorism
287:NPOV concerns at
542:
457:
451:
289:Silver RavenWolf
150:Lost (TV series)
86:Lost (TV series)
81:Lost (TV series)
550:
549:
545:
544:
543:
541:
540:
539:
493:
477:
456:
450:
432:
405:
374:
356:
327:
313:
292:
264:
203:
155:Hey, Leflyman!
142:
101:
83:
56:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
548:
546:
538:
537:
526:
525:
492:
485:
476:
473:
464:
454:
448:
431:
428:
404:
398:
373:
370:
355:
352:
351:
350:
326:
323:
312:
306:
291:
285:
263:
260:
259:
258:
215:Pseudoreligion
202:
199:
198:
197:
188:
179:
141:
138:
122:
121:
100:
97:
82:
79:
55:
52:
37:main talk page
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
547:
536:
533:
528:
527:
524:
521:
517:
512:
511:
510:
509:
506:
501:
498:
490:
486:
484:
483:
482:User:Synflame
474:
472:
471:
468:
463:
460:
445:
441:
437:
430:Lost proposal
429:
427:
426:
423:
419:
414:
413:
410:
403:
399:
397:
396:
393:
391:
386:
383:
382:
381:MC MasterChef
371:
369:
368:
365:
361:
360:
353:
348:
347:
346:
345:
342:
337:
336:
333:
324:
322:
321:
318:
311:
308:Nice work at
307:
305:
304:
301:
297:
290:
286:
284:
283:
280:
274:
273:
270:
261:
257:
253:
252:
251:
250:
247:
246:Spooky Donkey
243:
238:
234:
231:
227:
223:
218:
216:
212:
208:
201:Your comments
200:
196:
193:
189:
187:
184:
180:
178:
175:
171:
167:
166:
165:
164:
161:
156:
151:
146:
139:
137:
133:
132:
129:
126:
119:
115:
110:
109:
108:
106:
98:
96:
95:
92:
87:
80:
78:
77:
71:
69:
64:
59:
53:
51:
49:
44:
42:
38:
33:
32:
30:
19:
515:
502:
494:
488:
478:
433:
415:
406:
400:Proposal at
388:
384:
378:
375:
362:
357:
338:
328:
314:
293:
275:
265:
239:
235:
219:
204:
169:
157:
154:
134:
123:
117:
113:
102:
99:Lost history
84:
72:
60:
57:
45:
34:
26:
25:
160:Josiah Rowe
74:discussing.
63:Kate Austin
475:Lost Names
262:Lost edits
230:ad nauseam
222:ad hominem
228:argument
91:K1Bond007
29:TALK PAGE
532:Baryonyx
520:Baryonyx
505:Baryonyx
409:Baryonyx
387:Leave a
364:Klonimus
317:Klonimus
279:Cultofpj
190:Thanks!
183:Danflave
174:Baryonyx
269:Phoebus
452:ATHWIZ
341:Jayjg
332:Jayjg
300:Jkelly
192:Jtrost
128:(talk)
114:merged
76:Bjones
68:Bjones
497:DDG's
487:More
434:(See
16:<
516:Lost
491:Fun!
489:Lost
467:PKtm
422:PKtm
418:WWIN
402:WWIN
170:Lost
125:Noel
390:tip
43:.)
458:20
455:20
385:::
379:—
217:.
107::
70:)
50:.
449:M
392:—
31:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.