114:
achieve. Knowledge (XXG) is predicated on an encylopedic style of writing above all else. If someone (yourself?) with knowledge of the subject (certainly that's not me!) can make this point in a sentence (something along the lines of "the familiar Sarsen Stone construction of the monument that we see today, which archeologists believe to have taken final form around ?BC is but one of many stages etc" that will surely be the best solution. (
86:
built. So if we were to ask people to imagine
Stonehenge, do they think of the Neolithic hengiform earthwork? Perhaps the pre sarsen ‘burial ground’ (just a bunch of casual secondary cremations that’s all), or do they imagine the circle of 56 Aubrey Holes? Maybe they picture the long removed Bluestone Circle? I would say no, they imagine the ‘iconic’ monument of the postcards, so in this case ‘iconic’ is just fine.
85:
You have a point, but it is the word 'Stonehenge' that is overused. Why? Well if
Stonehenge was a single phase structure, then fine, but it isn't. Hence we a whole host of attributes that refer not to the 'iconic' monument, but, for example to events that happened long before the sarsen structure was
113:
Sitehut: I see what you're getting at, and that is a worthwhile point to get across. And therefore all the more reason to find a way to make that point with the greatest clarity possible, which the current debased and blurry state of the word 'iconic' is unfortunately no longer fit for purpose to
150:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
33:
175:
51:
171:
102:
162:
describes the
Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
167:
90:
163:
55:
37:
139:
130:
119:
159:
143:
94:
98:
155:
147:
158:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
151:
115:
76:
17:
72:
179:
123:
106:
80:
58:
40:
146:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
Knowledge (XXG)
32:
Your text also has another integration point. Check this
68:
54:, but do not just paste, integrate the text.. please --
52:Socioeconomics of Enlargement Era (Ottoman Empire)
138:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
50:If you want you can add the economic views to
8:
34:Science and Technology in the Ottoman Empire
7:
25:
164:review the candidates' statements
28:You can also consider this page
170:. For the Election committee,
140:Arbitration Committee election
131:ArbCom elections are now open!
71:. I agree with your stance. --
1:
180:13:59, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
166:and submit your choices on
195:
172:MediaWiki message delivery
124:23:34, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
107:16:47, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
81:12:38, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
59:19:55, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
41:20:03, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
144:Arbitration Committee
148:arbitration process
18:User talk:Lewvalton
160:arbitration policy
110:
93:comment added by
16:(Redirected from
186:
109:
87:
56:OttomanReference
38:OttomanReference
21:
194:
193:
189:
188:
187:
185:
184:
183:
168:the voting page
134:
88:
66:
48:
30:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
192:
190:
137:
133:
128:
65:
62:
47:
44:
29:
26:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
191:
182:
181:
177:
173:
169:
165:
161:
157:
153:
149:
145:
141:
132:
129:
127:
125:
121:
117:
111:
108:
104:
100:
96:
92:
83:
82:
78:
74:
70:
63:
61:
60:
57:
53:
45:
43:
42:
39:
35:
27:
19:
135:
112:
89:— Preceding
84:
67:
49:
31:
156:topic bans
152:site bans
116:Lewvalton
69:Nice edit
103:contribs
91:unsigned
95:Sitehut
142:. The
64:Iconic
176:talk
120:talk
99:talk
77:talk
73:John
46:help
136:Hi,
178:)
154:,
126:)
122:)
105:)
101:•
79:)
36:--
174:(
118:(
97:(
75:(
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.