User talk:Lindosland

4339:

make me think again though; the idea that if you leave the page in main space other editors might go for deletion. This would not, I think, have been the case some years ago; the emphasis was more about building Knowledge and encouraging new material. Now, I think there is too much enforcement of rules without regard to the basics of what we are trying to achieve. I think my answer would be to change the rules to emphasise 'if in doubt, leave a stub in place'; and 'only delete a page or put it to draft if you feel it is probably being created for the wrong reason, and even then I would relax the idea of notability. There are, I think no other reasons for putting a page to draft - NPOV, OR etc all call for those who criticise an article to improve it; or leave it for others to improve. No editor who makes the effort to create a new page should have to feel that he is in a race to finish it - we have other lives to lead! For example, my page 'Firs Estate School' was deleted on the grounds that primary schools are not in general notable. I actually did give references to some interesting background facts, but the page is gone; what a pity, and it puts me and others off trying. Primary schools would not be notable in Encyclopedia Britannica, but we have gone way beyond the old encyclopedia concept now, and we have no limit to pages/storage space. To many of us, our primary school is a bit of history, a place where fellow pupils perhaps began their life of fame under teachers they would forever thank, and who deserve to be named, and while other places might exist for schools, as friendsreunited did, they serve a different purpose. The history of a school and its teachers could be a vital resource for future biographers or historians; I would allow them all an entry. The same is true of early electronics manufacturers. Their names were everyday knowledge to many of us before China took over the industry - they WERE the industry, and world leaders; I and many others KNOW that; Erie, Mullard, Brimar, TCC, Collaro, BSR, Osram, Pilot, Bush, Mazda . . . I could go on and on, but my success in putting up pages on them has been mixed, and much effort wasted because of the struggle to find good secondary sources. I would say that good secondary sources and freedom from OR are important on controversial pages with competing views (many of which I have worked on), but much less important on the sort of pages I am talking about. No one is saying, 'no, actually, Erie etc did not exist, was not significant'! Forums may come and go and it would be good to transfer even their personal anecdotes to Wiki for posterity, rather than let our history be lost forever. Of course, I would draw the line at letting individuals put up their personal page purely for self-aggrandisement, but what harm is there in leaving a page like Erie up, suitably flagged as needing better sources etc. Do we really doubt that it was once important, when we have read the articles about it's huge significance to the town of Lowestoft and to the war effort? Have I put it up for misguided personal reasons - no, of course not. I can't blame you for this problem of course, but as someone who likes 'page patrolling' perhaps I can persuade you to help change the rules back, or encourage a better approach that looks for good intentions based on what I have said here? (I am not good at committee stuff - my life as a serious polymath, film maker, and writer is too precious to use up on it now!)

2329:

in buildings in the groounds of my home, some of which feeds into Lindos. I never liked business, and always enjoyed the R&D. That is why it is particulary sad that the test sheet database results cannot be used here to demonstrate the reality of audio (we specialise in measuring in a way that allows fair comparisons). Yes, most (but not all) of the entries are currently by Chris and myself, but that is because it has not been going long. I thought of including test sheets in articles, but that does not seem nice with Lindos on the top. To me it seems better to link to them - I hate advertising. I wonder if links in the form of citations in the text would be acceptable. I could say something like 'the iPod performed well in independant tests' with a citation link added. Would you consider that acceptable? As far as I can see, the rules support that, though you might still say I am linking to a site that I have interest in! I am in a peculiar position if I cannot refer to things I was involvded in, because there are only a few people in the world heading the development of test methods for audio, and I am the only one specialising in 'subjectively valid' test methods, despite having to fight a hard battle in the face of an industry run by 'spec writers' who tell lies as part of their marketing, so inevitably it all comes back to me! If I leave it for others to write, the job will not be so well done. Any further thoughts? --

2690:. One of the main things needed is to reference the article fully. As things stand there's only two passages that still need to be refernced, on of which is the passage on the BBC Research Department. Looking through the history I noticed you were the one who originally added the passage, so was wondering if you could help me sort out a reference (as this is particular topic is somewhat out of my area of expertise). If you could either provide a reference/references for the passage, supporting all the claims made in it, or else point me in the direction of a source I could add myself I'd be most appreciative. Any more general sources would also be useful as I'm planning to expand the section on the non-core BBC services in the near future. Finally, any other help you could offer would be more than welcome. Sorry to trouble you, but I'm sure you'd agree with me that an organisation as important as the BBC warrants a featured article. -- 2325:

Knowledge, and the Lindos ones can in some cases differ in POV of course. This is not important though. I do think it a pity that I cannot link to the test site database, especially for the IPod. Chris went to some trouble to find someone with the latest IPod so that we could add it to the site. I don't want to go into the details of Lindos much, suffice it to say that it is not nice to be constantly told that I own Lindos when it was actually taken from me in very painful and complicated circumstances connected with a split with my partner and mother of my children. Lindos was in other hands from 1994 until 2003 when it was transferred to Chris by mutual agreement, with me giving him the right to use IP rights which it transpired I still owned (there were legal battles). Clearly I am involved, and don't deny it, but the facts are the facts.

1592:, but you have not justified this on the talk page. I am all too aware that what I have written there is not generally understood, especially in the USA, but it is widely agreed, especially by professionals. I am in an unusual position here, because I have spent 25 years promoting 'proper' measurements, and am to some extent considered an authority on the subject. I could for example cite the prestigious 'The Audio Engineers Reference Book' by Butterworth Heineman, but then I wrote the chapter on audio measurement in it at the request of its editor, so is it fair to do that or not?! Tell me what you consider innacurate or wrong, and I am happy to discuss things (on Talk:Distortion measurement). -- 1825:

equipment avilable at low cost that could make them (it used to be argued that no one used 468 weighted noise because only costly equipment could measure it, but I changed that). The opposition comes from marketing people, and I find that other 'experts' in the field all agree on this. There is no dispute among those truly involved in the subject, just resistance from manufacturers who want big numbers for their marketing folk. This problem comes up again and again in standards commitees and working groups. I see nothing wrong with trying to clear away the fog and show the true field as understood by those truly engaged in it. It occurs to me that if

2124:

areas. Lindos is a very high profile company in the area of audio measurements, and the articles on its site are very pertinent to many Knowledge topics. The test sheet database is a novel concept, built by users, rather like Knowledge, and hence of great interest to those reading audio topics. My personal interest has always been in improving the understanding of audio quality and measurement, and that is my role now, through my own business Lindos Developments, which does not sell anything but has income from IP rights. Perhaps you should have a go at the IPod page. That's pure product advertising for one manufacturer!!

1789:

facts." I am not suggesting evading NPOV guidlines, and I have been involved in discussions where evidence was given to me of the desirability of separating out viewpoints - so long as it is made clear than they represent only one viewpoint. We are not talking of editor POV here, but the existence of alternative 'schools of thought'. These exist all over the place. You will not find all schools of Psychiatry covered on one Knowledge page - they are split off into Freud, Laing,and dozens of others. Nor does anyone attempt a page on Religion, and forbid the splitting off of Christianity, Islam etc! It just couldn't work.

1142:

difficult. I hope not to upset anyone of course, but really the electronics pages were such a mess in places that I felt it best to try to fix some things, for example I changed a couple of names for uniformity. I've commented everything, and feel that since some of these pages have been marked for tidying up for a long time, I should be forgiven for trying to improve matters on a big scale. Glad you like it. I'm off to bed, and will then rest and take in further comments. Personally I feel this is it, pending automation.

1951:. Basically I intend that all anyone will have to do to use this concept is add a tempate of the form 'Branchlist|Rootpage|Hubpage' to a page they are working on, choosing the Root and Hub pages that they want to assign. The template will then be created (or added to if already in existence automatically as described at the talk page. No one need ever manually create the template or edit it. Any conflicts (like trying to list a hub that already belongs to another root) will be flagged up. Can you help with this? -- 2282:. I really do want these articles read. They are used as a teaching resource by several universities who's professors (in Audio engineering) have recently contacted us to let us know. Lets get down to their content, not what website they are on. Of course I could move them to another website, or I could have remained anonymous like most Wikipedians, or I could get others to put up the links (as per Knowledge above) but doesn't that seems less satisfactory than just being open about it all, as is my way? -- 1848:

generate 'hash' that is at no particular frequency, and trying to pick out the harmonics and sum them RMS is just meaningless. So THD is a very special case of non-linear distortion in fact. Note that this is not just me plugging my idea. I've been involved in AES working groups and made contrbutions to standards bodies. This method of distortion measurement was included in IEC268 (though as an option) following pressure from me and others, as was the 468-weighted noise measurement (again as an option).

1647:

levels, but outside the UK I suggest that such measurements are made in development more than in quality testing. Of course the 'audiophiles' don't get to see the true picture, as they are less into broadcasting and studio environments, and I would like to make them more aware of the fact that true 'subjectively valid' measurements are in widespread use. I see recent moves by other firms towards my approach recently - some of their press releases look remarkably as if I had written them! --

1212:

trying to negotiate every change on every page would take forever. I therefore plead that this is a special case: this is best demonstrated, rather than explained, and it is potentially of major benefit to the working of Knowledge. I've only used two major series of article for the purpose, both of which were in need of 'cleanup', and I would not have proceded if I did not feel that what I am now proposing meets all the objections so far. Be bold it says! Reverting is easy after all. --

1108:

tricky. My feeling is that this must be attached to either the Electronics (root page) or Noise. I would put it on Noise, as it forms one of a list of branch pages there which have noise in common. Once assigned, then I suggest putting a link to Electronic noise in the 'see also' list of Electronics. In other words I don't think Electronic noise should be part of the Electronics group of topics as it belongs more in the topic Noise, and there should be no duplication ideally. --

869:

or 20 topics only). Going back to 'Electronic component' we get the 'wider' view of 'Semiconductor', 'PCB', Circuit, etc (again around 20 topics). As I've already said, I'd like to see this automated, so that every box fills itself out once the backlink is designated. This means that the backlink disignation needs a label thats recognisable by software to signify the Root page relationship, and I'm now using a template for this purpose called 'backlink'.

1557:

width, and it can be a good place to put the navbox, at least for screen sizes of 800x600 to 1024x786, which should cover typical screens today except for hand-held displays. The question which will remain is, how do we deal with a proliferation of navigation methods (categories, portals, various navbox templates, "See also" lists, etc.) I guess we will just have to keep experimenting, and probably several methods will coexist. --

4607: 4385: 4132: 4059: 3821: 3895: 3047: 4522: 3634: 2389:

could easily get out of hand. When it comes to citations in the article though, and the matter of crediting my own sources, I stand my ground, and ask you to restore those links please. I wonder if you would object if I credited 'The Audio Engineer's Reference Book' (Focal Press) for which I wrote. It's extremely independant and reputable, but would you object to the 'self reference'--

3442: 3382: 204:, as of an hour ago! I've applied it to some animation pages, but many more need the root page link adding in the first line of the 'See also'. By refering every page back to the Root page, and listing all derivatives on the root page people can readily see what work has already been done, and avoid duplication. It would be nice if you would now help spread the word on the 3297:

the copyright belongs to the photographer, not the family of the man, unless evidence of purchase of copyright and its inheritance can be produced, which of course is unlikely. Tracing the photographer is pretty impossible. I would therefore class this as fair use unless actually challenged by an alleged copyright owner. Yes, I made the .png from the gif.

4325:

different periods, or if they are for good reason - in my case separating my professional area from my polymath interests during one period). I make no claim to be expert on the rules - I believe there is room for some of us to use writing skills to make Wiki better while others tidy up and improve and I hate it when an editor is accused of being 'lazy'.

3779: 2906: 1326:

for now) of a three-level organisation side by side at the top, and use it to navigate in a 'serial' manner, such that 100 pages are covered by just 10 selections per box. As far as I know, that approach has not been used before, and having put it in place I find it incredibly useful, especially when trying to bring some organisation to

2165:

fact that I founded Lindos 27 years ago does not ban me from refering to in on Knowledge so far as I am aware. How am I 'promoting my own interests' any more than anyone else who adds links to business sites. I am doing hard work to spread much needed information about audio quality and measurement. Please stop undoing it! --

2202:

now and let others have a chance to check the links and decide. Removing the one serious test result from the iPod site, a most valuable resource, is especially mean. Have you looked at the links. If you were seriously interested in audio topics I think you would see them as of unique value. Please put them all back. --

1629:

vast majority of people consider those to be "quality" measurements and use them as such. Regardless, the two topics are so closely related that they belong in the same article, and splitting them is not "balance", but a POV fork. The "balance" is better if both "sides" are all in the same place for comparison. —

1571:

as they clutter the page and are too confusing to be of help. My scheme, with its nested listing, seems much neater and more effective, and now recruits the idea of the navbox and takes it further while attempting to encourage coordinated editing. Hope you will understand my reasoning and support it. Regards --

4338:

My immediate thought is that the article should be put back into main space to allow other editors to contribute. Like you I searched for other sources, and my conclusions were the same as yours; they were mostly forums and the like, with first hand accounts and so not ideal. One thing you say does

4274:

for pinging me. I see you are an esteemed editor how has been around for longer than I have and you have made a significant number of important edits. This is certainly much appreciated by the community. I cannot really comment on how things have been 3+ years ago as I have not been around that long,

3211:

As explained above, I do not really wish to ascend the Wiki learning curve any further than I have to. Rather than tangling with editing in the first instance, I am content to make the suggestions as above, and leave you as a seasoned contributor to consider them. Please forgive this newbie for any

2625:

The bot doesn't decide to delete or propose for deletion of anything. What happened was the AfD notice was something like 80% of the page and the removal of it looked like it was vandalism. I think a prod might be a good idea, as I'm not 100% sure if it fits. In short, Tawkerbot2 didn't propose it

2388:

I do feel that you have made me think hard and study the rules about this, and change my views on external links generally, such that I will not in future put external links to Lindos Electronics as, though there are links to selling sites on Knowledge, I can see the point, and I now think such links

2201:

I dispute the "30 to 40". The links are to articles, and, as I have explained, a public database. Both are a major resource written by me for the benefit of the industry and the public. The fact that these are on the Lindos website should not bar them from being linked to. I think you should back off

2137:

Sites that contain neutral and accurate material not already in the article. Ideally this content should be integrated into the Knowledge article, then the link would remain as a reference, but in some cases this is not possible for copyright reasons or because the site has a level of detail which is

1570:

I agree about careful placement and have today placed several navboxes alongside the contents box just as you suggest, being a little more careful after your prompt! How to deal with a proliferation of methods - replace them with the Rootpage concept! I dislike big navigational boxes/series templates

1325:

Hi Photon. I wonder if you understand what I am trying to do. Firstly I hate nav-boxes as usually applied, as I think they lose usefulness and add clutter when they get big. I realised, by experimenting, that I could make a template with both the 'Root page' and the current 'Hub' (lets call them that

1248:

I think I was unwise to use the comment 'testing' since what I added is simply a navigation template fully in line with Knowledge policy and widely used. What I was testing was the use of different templates on different pages, with the Root page|Hub page at the top for easy navigation. Nevertheless,

868:

Using Root page, with just 20 pages listed in any 'serial' box we get easy navigation to all 400 in a way that makes sense. Thus, finding ourselves at 'Transistor', a branch page of 'Electronics component' we might see a box headed 'Electronic component' plus a list of 'Resistor', 'Capacitor' etc (10

860:

Yes, I was aware of 'series' boxes, and commented recently that I liked the idea of a box on the RHS just as in the example given here. But there's more to this than just listing pages. Firstly Root page actually states that it is about 'centralised style' - a common introduction, and a base camp for

822:

What do you think of this idea of Ambush's, Lindosland? I originally mentioned something like this in my proposal (ie navigation sidebars) but was persuaded that they are not a good idea. I think it makes the page too cluttered and distracts from the text really. it certainly takes up more room than

367:

I'm not sure about this but I tend to think the redirect is best, and as you say, there is precedent. I don't understand your comment 'A reader shouldn't have to deal with the inner-workings of Knowledge if all they want to do read an article.' Root page is just a phrase used as a label on a page. It

4287:

for adding additional sources. However, similar to the existing source, this strikes me as blogs/forums/user created contents (similar to Knowledge), which is not generally regarded as appropriate sourcing. I am convinced that there must be additional sources - probably in newspaper archives, public

3296:

which is the best quality image that google comes up with. I can make no claim for a right to use it, and I put it to Knowledge a long time ago, when attitudes to image copyright were perhaps less strict. Getting legal permission for copyright use on old portraits seems to me to be impossible, since

2529:

I've responded to your note on my talk page. I'm sorry, but I need more time to study out the issue before voting. I'm not sure that your hard work is the correct solution, because of the sub-page structure. Please keep me informed of the status of the request. I do believe in the root page concept.

2269:

I do not own or maintain the Lindos Electronics website. I write professionally, and some of my writing is for Lindos. I have also written for 'The Audio Engineer's Reference Book' which refers to its authors as 'world experts in the field'. Note that as some articles contain sections on things that

2146:

Firstly your user page clearly states "I am an electronics engineer, and founded Lindos Electronics in 1979." Secondly it is you, and as far as I can tell only you, who has been adding links to Lindos all over the place. Something like thirty or fourty separate pages. And it is you who created the

2123:

I am very surprised and puzzled by this comment. Firstly, I have added no links to my own private website (I do not own or control Lindos Electronics). Secondly, Knowledge is full of external links to company sites, often of poor quality. Please specify what pages you have in mind, as I work on many

1902:

Maybe, but the common part is essential for future automated creation, and the number/letter system is simple and quick to type. I would really like the name to be in a parametric form, like 'branchlist|electronics|analog electronics' but I'm not sure whether this is acceptable at present (not sure

1646:

I think Lindos probably has more test sets out there in the world - certainly in broadcasting where we have many thousands now, and I am constantly told they are the 'de-facto standard'. I give due credit to AP, whose equipment certainly does a fine job of measuring in engineering terms to super low

1358:

could be a root page on its own, branching to theory, science fiction etc. Some such pages could be little more than lists, pointing you to other areas, but by being there they would 'complete the set'. Like LightCurrent I really want a way of tying pages together to make it easier to sort them out

890:

I think we now have some serious rethinking to do bearing in mind the objections that have been raised. if we can achieve our aims using existing Knowledge constructs, then i feel the idea may gain more support. Im not sure yet what those constructs should be apart from the fact that I would like to

864:

Then there is the problem of big topics, which is why I keep being drawn back to two (at least) levels of Rootpage. If Electronics has 400 articles (which it may come to have) then listing all 400 in the box, and on every page gets really messy, if not impracticable, and we tend to ignore it as its

271:

I'm not sure - this was troubling me, and was why I didn't put Root page in the Knowledge namespace myself to start with! I realised it could be done with a piped link, but dislike the extra complication for editors when redirect makes it easier. Is there any reason why it is not appropriate to link

3197:

book, I cannot help feeling gratified that they have appeared at another's hand, and that you see my site as sufficiently authoritative for citation. I have registered on Knowledge chiefly to gently safeguard my interests (I have added a note confirming my Knowledge username on the Welcome page of

2328:

After 25 years in the field I now despair at the way things are going backwards with myth replacing reality in so many things concerned with audio. Chris agrees, and Lindos is very much our vehicle for trying to educate both professionals and the public back to a proper understanding. I do research

2301:

Secondly would you please make clear your connection to Lindos Electronics. You say you "do not own or control Lindos Electronics", and "it ceased to be mine in 1994". However the About page on the Lindos site was written by you and dated 2001. The page full of test results is mostly attributed

1642:

Fine, and thanks for prompting me to do it, as I want to get the balance right. While I understand what you are saying, I might question your 'most people understand ...'. Though most people are familiar with the Audio Precision test set, which tends to use the methods I condemn, it is a fact that

1333:

I agree that there is a problem in making topics 'belong' to a field, but the advantages of this for editing and checking that all areas of a field are covered are so great that I still want to do this. For many pages it works well, but for others such as you mention there is indeed a problem. I'm

747:

Trying to introduce Root page has involved a lot of work trying to understand various detailed issues people have raised regarding policy and procedures, and I'm getting a bit weary of it, but would be dissapointed to see it fail after so much effort. Like Light current I really just want to get on

522:

Yes, read that, and I note the reasons. The truth is, I'm not sure where to go next. I dislike templates (too bold and get in the way). I dislike the big templates in some serial style articles, and note that others do to. But I still think Root page offers things that are needed but not covered by

4352:

I might add that I am not the only one with these views. I read an article a few years ago by Jimmy Wales himself in which he despaired of the many ways in which Knowledge had become a struggle for power, with less goodwill, and more hoops for the beginner to jump through, and I have also read in

3751:

and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion

2399:

If you are using it as a source then it should be cited properly using Ref tags, not inlined in the text, but as author what you should actually do is to reference the source texts from which you took the information. If it is your own original work and not taken from secondary sources, then that

2384:

Also, it seems clear to me that 'what to link to'has to be interpretted as taking precedence over 'links to normally avoid', partly because the latter is a weaker statement qualified by 'normally' and partly because otherwise the two clash in some instances. The big problem is that a respected and

1628:

Thanks for working to remove the bias towards your company; I'll look at it later. I understand that you don't consider some of those measurements to be "quality" measurements, and I haven't had much time to look through your ideas in depth (weighted THD, etc.) but, when interpreted properly, the

1556:

Following Lindos reply on my page— fair enough. On pages with no image at the top, I think your navbox works pretty well. When there is an image there, placement requires more judgement, and individuals opinions will vary as to what is best. I have noticed that the Contents box self-adjusts its

1291:

because its huge on the screen, but its basically irrelevant to the laser article. The one in the WWII article seems very appropriate, since that again is a huge topic area with many, many associated articles. I don't like the way that template is injected in the middle of the text, before the see

980:

Yes, Lightcurrent, I favour 10 or 20 branches each leading to 'sub-pages' (though I now think it's confusing to give them any such name) each with 10 or 20 branches. From my trials so far I feel this does indeed let us 'whizz around' 400 pages or so as on Electronics. I see what you mean about two

89:

The most work went into creating Equal loudness contours, Fletcher-munson curves, and Robinson Dadson curves Lindos1 Lindos2 . . . Lindos5, but I've been keen to get these available in scalable vector form. Now I'v done it, there seems to be a problem. Every day, one or two graphs are not loading

3459:

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be

3399:

2380:

I must insist that I simply do not own or maintain the Lindos.co.uk website (I have my own websites). I write professionally from my own lab and studio, and some, but not all, of what I write is used by Lindos Electronics and copyrighted by them (manuals, leaflets, articles as well as web stuff).

2339:

There is still the problem of you placing links here that point to a commercial website that you are involved in (directly or indirectly) and content that is mostly your own creation. I'm sure I mentioned this before, but standard procedure in situations like this, is to list the links you think

2324:

I'm giving in on this, though I am a bit unhappy that so many other links to commercial (and less philanthropic) sites exist on Knowledge. I now think I was misled by this fact. Linking to the articles seemed logical, since I have actually be combining writing for the Lindos site with writing for

2164:

This is most unfair. All the links I add are added because they are extremely relevant to the page. You might also note that I work many hours a day writing for Knowledge and many of the articles you refer to were created by me, often donating material from my writings for Lindos Electronics. The

1847:

Distortion residue measurement is certainly not a form of THD measurement. THD is as misleading as RMS power, a purely mathematical concept that should be banished! I say this because there is no reason to suppose that audio systems generate harmonics. Digital system tend not to - in general they

1717:

Regarding 'balance', I understand that preferred policy is to 'fork' on controversial topics rather than weaken the content by trying to balance. I would agree that its fair to start with a balanced reference to the fact that two approaches exist, but trying to mix the two becomes confusing and I

1536:

If you are going to add these navigation boxes to many articles, you might take some care in placing them so they don't affect the page formatting and run into the text. Part of a good encyclopedia is good page design. Some articles have pictures, content boxes, and other illustrations arranged

1211:

I note your comment, but have been working on this idea (with others) over a considerable period, considering many comments, and finding it a particularly difficult problem. We are at a point where the same objections are being asked again and again based on failure to grasp what it is about, and

159:

Can you post the source of the Stoddard picture to the image description page? (Book, website, whatever)? All images on Knowledge not created by their authors need to have explicit sources listed or else they are deleted after 7 days. I'm pretty sure that image is no longer copyrightd (I'm pretty

114:

Ah I just realised you added your 'alternative version'. I do admire the way you generated your curves, but find that I constantly want to read off values, and the accuracy is only as good as can be estimated from the graph (Ideally I would add a table). Adding the log frequency scale, which your

4278:

One of my main pieces of "interest" on Knowledge is new page patrolling. When I read your article as part of patrolling, I actually hesitated for a few moment to decide next steps as I realised the subject might be notable. As it stood then, the one source was clearly insufficient as I would not

4258:

I've created hundreds of Knowledge articles from scratch, since the early days, and they have always just stayed up from the start. Admittedly I haven't created one for a while and am out of touch, but have the rules really changed this much! It seems I have to create the article myself. What

2885:

I object to these deletions being made so quickly during a period when I was away from Knowledge. I now have no way of seeing why this was so. It seems quite wrong to me that there should now be no page on 'colouration' where I had created one - it's a perfectly valid word with a well understood

1824:

I've no desire to 'plug my own company' (actually I don't own it now). I actually created my Lindos out of frustration with the confused state of audio measurement and have gone on to devote much of my life to trying to improve true understanding, and facilitate meaningful measurements by making

1788:

I was wrong to copy your use of the word 'fork' for what I meant. I see that (quote from NPOV) "A POV fork is an attempt to evade NPOV guidelines by creating a new article about a certain subject that is already treated in an article often to avoid or highlight negative or positive viewpoints or

1141:

and feel that they are in much better shape now ready for the attempted cleanup to be finished off. I am finding that the best way to work out the solution we seek is to try this out with real pages, and it's probably the best way to demonstrate the value in the idea since we are finding this so

1107:

I'm not sure what the problem is. Firstly, I think you have a wrong understanding of disambiguation. It is really for words with two totally different meanings, not categories of the topic. From Noise you easily get to Environmental noise by looking down the Branch List. Electronic noise is more

2038:

concept, which 'ties down' a page to a central topic with easy navigation around the whole topic. Perhaps you would take a look at it - we need support to make it policy. I wouldn't bother with 'noise quantification', after all, most pages list multiple categories. The main one needed is Noise.

1613:

After re-reading I realised that this article was much more POV than I had realised, and remembered that I had written it for the Lindos website and had not gone through it sufficiently after transferring it. I've now had a major attempt at Wikifying and have removed the template. It inevitably

1264:

Hi Lindosland, I don't think the navigation box idea is a bad one for the electronics area, but I don't like the idea of implying that certain topics that combine electronics with other fields (optoelectronics, robotics, ...) are somehow wholly contained within the electronics area. This is the

4324:

Hi Jake, an thank you for your kind and sensible response. I have probably been editing for longer, and on more articles than you realise, since I have used other usernames (I trust you will not shout Sockpuppet at me - this has been gone into long ago, and Wiki allows multiple user names at

561:

I'm sorry about that, my email host apparently has overzealous spam blocking. The level was set to "low." I've now turned off spam-blocking and would appreciate it if you'd try to send email again. I'd also appreciate it if you'd let me know exactly what error message you got the last time.

2274:

So I do not feel I have breached Knowledge rules, and I do feel that I am doing a good service for Knowledge. Given that fact, I do not feel you should be policing so many articles hastily in the way that you are. You should leave the links for others to decide their relevance to each page

1162:

Great! You can see why I got carried away once I got started! The navigation just makes it so much easier to see what you've got where as you try to decide where best to put things. I keep finding more and more devices to gather into the collection - ferrite bead, varistor, vacuum tube ...

617:

I had no intention of sneaking in this idea. Not knowing any better, I just made a page called Knowledge: Hub page and introduced the notice on a couple of pages a few weeks ago because it seemed like the best way to deal with the problem of large subjects (like electrical engineering and

4071:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

2019:

All of your articles on noise weighting & measurement seem to be scattered across a number of noise & sound-related categories. I'd suggest creating a new category for them but I'm flummoxed as to an appropriate name for them that would properly capture their semantics. Perhaps

4144:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

488:

Sorry, I nearly gave a reason, which is that I don't feel the root page matter to be resolved yet, and since this page is quoted as a demonstation page I think it should remain up until a decision is made there. I'm thinking more about aspects of summary style before answering.

872:

So no, there isn't any equivalent. Yes, series boxes great, but with serial organisation and only 20 or so links per box. I need to look at how these are created. So far they've seemed offputting as a bit complex to create, but perhaps we can put them to use in this new form.

90:

onto the pages (random?)yet the files are there, and just re-saving the text page without change restores things till the next time. Any ideas why? I've flagged this on the bugs page, but no answers. Maybe .svg files all suffer this problem (I now see they are not common). --

2257:

Knowledge is full of links to sites of companies that sell product. The Lindos site is not just for selling. A major part of it is intended as a resource for technical information on measurement, and the sections I link to are intended for education and are not about Lindos

1829:

were to cover the 'majority view' then most of it would be about alternative medicine and herbal remedies (and even witchcraft), though medical professionals would reject most of that. This is similar. Audio is full of quacks selling 'snake oil' (like oxygen-free speaker

119:

Wow, no sooner written than I get a reply. I've only been doing Wiki for a few weeks in ernest, but it's taking me over, and forever surprising me! Yes, that's helpful, and I'll try those things (later, it's 1.50am and I must go to bed). I got hooked into writing most of

4304:. Of course, this is not policy, but rather a well written essay about the predicament between what we feel might be right and the paramount need for reliable source to ensure article contents is verifiable. Another editor has recently summarised this along the line of 3470:

deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Knowledge's policies and guidelines. --

3410:

2263:

9 A website that you own or maintain (unless it is the official site of the subject of the article). If it is relevant and informative, mention it as a possible link on the talk page and wait for someone else to include it, or include the information directly in the

621:

I am of course willing to abide by the rules for new ideas if Im aware of them and am happy to discuss these ideas on talk:root page or talk:hub page with a view to implementing some sort of organisation on large subjects--Light current 19:22, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

2182:

All the content you have added to Knowledge is much appreciated. And note I never touched or deleted the page you created on your own company. However linking to your companies website on around thirty to fourty different pages crosses the line. Please read

4631:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

1122:

Lindosland , I like what you are attempting to do on the electronics pages. However, we must be careful to persuade other editors thet what we are doing is right. I would therefore ask you to hold back a bit and see what the reaction is before doing any more

4353:

the press about how many good original editors have given up on Knowledge because it was so much in the grip of 'vigilantes', protecting pages and enforcing rules, that they could no longer be bothered. Still, in general, I am very very proud of Knowledge!

2381:

That means that when I use such material as the basis for Knowledge articles (as Lindos permits me to) Lindos Electronics really should get a link crediting the source, as per the rule I quoted that says specifically that 'not to do so would be plagiarism'.

2509:

I didn't see the bot make any changes to the page, (unless I haven't had enough espresso this morning) so I don't think its a bot problem. I'm a little confused, what exactly are you trying to do, fix a redirect or is there something in the template --

4283:. I probably spent a good 5-10 minutes searching online to see if I can find at least one reliable source to add and then mark the article as patrolled. Unfortunately, I did not find any sources that were of sufficiently high quality. I'd like to thank 4259:

happened to 'be bold' and the idea that people helped create an article from a stub? One citation should be enough to justify notability, and I've given a good one. Surely articles should be given a chance and only deleted for very good reason later.

1330:. My fear is that people don't realise how this works, logical though it is, and think its just an ordinary nav-box to be added to add-lib. If we could just get a core of editors out there who did understand, then I think it could all fall into place. 272:

to the Knowledge namespace from articles? Are you saying that Root page should not be in WNS? Is there any reason not to leave the redirect in place too? It fooled me when I just tried to look at Root page by entering the shortened form into search! --

3833:

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

2385:

well known researcher cannot write articles based on his own writings, as he needs to credit the source by one rule but cannot, according to you, by another rule. He can hardly write the article and then ask someone else to credit his sources can he?

4047:

Yes, you have my permission to used that image. It's quite nice to see that my graphs are being used all over the place; I've been asked for permission to use it in books before, and almost any search for 'A-weighting' brings it up! Peter Skirrow

1379:

I had no link back and no link to the others in the series. I was tempted to introduce my system there, as it would have done exactly what I wanted, with a heading Linguistics|Semantics and then a list of the very topics I was looking for. Regards

4291:

As reviewers we generally have three choices: a) suggest for deletion via one of the ways possible, b) move to draft, c) make minor updates to bring over the line (if appropriate) and then mark as reviewed. I usually move articles to draft when I

380:

for 'MetaCategories'. There I guess I am redefining Knowledge as one of several MetaCategories, the others being Book:, Film:, Song:, Standard:, etc in the first namespace. Does that make sense to you, or do you see any inconsistancy there?

4296:

there might be additional sources that will just take longer or an expert in the field to find AND there is a chance that another reviewer might successfully mark the article for deletion. Given lack of easily accessible RS I saw this as

368:

will rarely be clicked on - only when readers wonder what it is and click to get an explanation. Redirecting into the Knowledge namespace seem quite alright to me, its not as if every Root page is reliant on this path to work in some way.

4634:

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has

2246:

They were not added to promote a site, they were added for their value as articles. Nothing suggests otherwise. Please note that I always link to the specific article or specification of relevance, never the Lindos main page or selling

2561:

that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Knowledge articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept our apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior.

2462:

1978:

Yes, thanks, I've never marked for deletion before. I am at this moment going through all affected articles and have come across one or two that I had missed in the changeover. I was horrified to see three big deletion templates on

1057:

and all that or (b) electronics noise articles.....HOW ABOUT JUST A TWO WAY SPLIT DISAMBIG PAGE FOR THIS...then do what you want with the electronics side and ill handle the subsequent branching on the acoustics or nois pollution

802:

Instead, put it on a "series" box on the right (see the example). You can extend it even further by adding links to other related articles, so that the number of clicks to move to the next topic is one rather than two+a scroll. —

103:

Yeah, SVG support was only added like a month ago. Try refreshing your cache, purging the image page (I'm not really sure what this does), or changing the px size of the thumbnail a little to force the server to regenerate it. —

2990: 450:. In due course you might use your Bot to change this. Although I've now re-worded the page to use this term, I have left it where it is for now to avoid breaking links from other discussion places. I have created a dummy page 3682:.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of 1687:

I've looked in more depth at your measurement methods, and understand what you're saying about distortion residue. It certainly makes sense, but it's really just a specific variation on THD measurements, and so belongs in the

4311:

I hope this helped to explain my reason for moving to draft. As others have outlined, you are absolutely free to move the article back to main space and allow another reviewer to form an opinion based on available sources.

861:

editors. Anyone clicking on Root page gets some instructions on exactly what to do, plus all the history on the talk page. The page at the top of the 'series box' has no such designation, it just appears as head of a list.

2603:

notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages. The notices and comments are needed to establish community consensus about the status of an article, and removing them is considered

2586:

908:

Serial organisation on a 'root' page need only go to 10 or 20 (say) sub topics. These sub topic pages could have thier own serial boxes thus giving the multiplier effect. Im not sure if this would meet your needs. Please

1963:

tags, so they do not mark the articles they are transcluded within for CSD as well. The templates I did not delete have been removed from CSD, please orhpan them before relisting for CSD, or list them on TFD. Thanks, —

1405:

Please note that I have nothing against your template; from what I've seen, it looks like a good idea, so as far as I'm concerned you can re-apply your edit to PLD (with a bit less stuff in your paste buffer ;-) ).

997:. At the momoent all the balls are in the air (ie no decisions made just suggestion) Please come and join the discussion as the more participants we have, the more likely we are to get a workable solution quickly.-- 3666:, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are: 1747:

viewpoint that everyone can agree with. Individual editors' authority doesn't hold much weight here; we depend on references and third-party verifiable facts instead. After all, we've had resident "experts" on

3999:

I am working with Prof. Steven LaValle to help obtain permissions for borrowing figures or pictures in his upcoming book Virtual Reality, to be published by Cambridge University Press. The book is online here:

2756:

I have a question and will be very glad if you can provide me an answer. My question is that why is the noise figure defined using available power gain rather than transducer power gain or operating power gain?

4428: 4172: 4099: 3861: 1806:

Your reference to experts also seems wrong to me. You are referring to 'self appointed experts' but I was simply pointing out that I can give references that are regarded as authoritative but which I wrote

1602:

I'm sorry for tagging it and leaving; I haven't had much time to work on things lately, but it's still factually wrong regarding distortion and harmonics produced. I'll work on it when I have some time. —

3477: 3417: 842:

Actually its quite nice to play with. THe box maintains a constant posn on the screen and you can nav v.quickly. But again it can take up quite a bit of room. Although its worth considering! See what you

3456:, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Knowledge (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated. 3396:, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Knowledge (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated. 396:

It seems that the redirect is used in lots of cases, despite my grievance with the idea. So the redirect is ok. What is not ok is using the "shortened form" as you call it. You must use the full link ].

4275:

however, anecdotally I believe that "governance" around new page patrolling has probably increased as a response to spam, unconstructive editing, etc. You are clearly not part of this group of concerns.

3731:), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See 1743:. We depend on showing all sides of an issue in the same article and using consensus and the wiki process to distill stale back-and-forth arguments in favor of a sort of overall, neutral, fact-based, 4412:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 4156:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 4083:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 3845:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 2491:. I was trying to get the template I put up to turn black, and identified the problem as the use of an en-dash somewhere. I tried to delete the redirect but it caused a delete template to appear on 413:) will be shown in the lower left corner of the window. It's better that readers see that it leads to the Knowledge namespace, so they realise the concept is not real but just Knowledge bureaucracy 2643:

I removed the Wiki links as WP isn't a directory of books. However a summary of his books would be suitable on the David Smail page. Very interesting by the way. I like what he has come up with.

3472: 3412: 2302:

to you and Chris Skirrow (your son perhaps?). The articles you've said were mostly written by you. Okay, so you may no longer own the business but you do seem to be involved to some degree.

1334:

wondering whether the way round this is to create more than one page for some topics, attached to different Root pages, but with a different slant (in many cases these already exist). Thus

981:

series boxes on each sub-page, and I guess that could be optional. It's so easy to go back a level once you understand the concept that perhaps its superfluous. Keep it simple we said! --

1310:

You could end up with hundreds of articles in a nav-box for electronics, so the "big box at the bottom" seems like a better solution to me than the "little box at the top" of the article.

2984: 4398: 4479:, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. 1545:

in an apparent haphazard or hasty fashion. Please be more careful, or the additions will spark negative reactions before it can be determined whether they are useful or not. --

2313:

The accepted procedure is to post the proposed links in the Talk section of the article, and let other - neutral - wikipedia editors decide whether or not it should be included.

3794: 1486:

Hi Lindosland. I've noticed that in some of your edits you've added things like "Please continue moving appropriate links from below and put the backlink template on them (see

2495:

and now I just don't know how to fix things and get there at all. Can you sort it out for me? I want the nav template to work without going through the em-dash redirect. --

1297:

I also noticed that not all of the article that has a pointer in from the World War II template necessarily has a copy of the template in it. For example, clicking on the

2847:

process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Knowledge's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "

2788:

process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Knowledge's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "

86:

Hi, I see a comment 'that was a lot of work'. Are you commenting on my work recently (yes it was!), or the fact that I replaced your work (I worried about this a bit).

2034:

I find that many many articles have no category or lack appropriate categories. I do not find categories very useful for searching, which is why I have introduced the

3208:

article, whilst the "Gilbert Davey" link works, the "Fun with Radio" link does not - at my current state of Knowledge knowledge, I could not begin to guess why not!

753:

I was thinking about the implications of your proposal. To a certain extent it's useful, but I think it might be the wrong execution. I ask you reconsider what your

4627: 4574:

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at

474:

Lindosland, it's common practise to give a reason, either on the talk page or in the edit when reverting. I gave a valid reason for removing the root page header -

1305:, but the WWII template isn't included on that page. There is a very compact "History of World War II by nation" template in the military history of Japan article. 1526:

isn't a supported guideline, and will be rejected soon enough. Just letting you know so you don't waste your time/disrupt articles with Root page related edits.--

3201:

On the discussion pages for each of these two articles, I have added a few points which (as originator and chief contributor thus far) you may wish to consider.

1435:

more text, I had a rush of that old "Oh no, I reverted to a vandalized version!" fear, and it took me a few moments to figure out what had actually happened. ;-)

523:

serial style. I need to think more about the optimum solution, as I am not keen to challenge serial style, which has clearly had a lot of effort put into it. --

827:. But the advantage is that you can see where you are going and what options are avail- but you can see this anyway from links on a root page. So i dont know!-- 2365:(unless it is the official site of the subject of the article). If it is relevant and informative, mention it as a possible link on the talk page and wait for 1418:

Oh dear! Very sorry about that, and thanks for realising what I'd done. I should have been pasting just one word, but it was the early hours of the morning. --

1315:

These comments aren't meant to discourage making a nav-box, just to try to throw some ideas out that you can pick and choose from to improve the end result --

1279:. For more loosely coupled articles, or when the number of articles is more than 5 or 10, a bigger box at the bottom of the page seems to be more common (see 544:. You can put this section back, but first you need to provide sources that show that its major assertions have already been published by a reputable source. 2278:

How about compromise? One link to Lindos per article if you like, and no mention of Lindos in any link as it appears on Knowledge (as I have largely done on

261:, it's not really appropriate to link to the Knowledge namesapce from articles. Hope that's what you wanted. If not, let me know and I'll change them back.-- 1643:

Lindos Electronics started before AP existed (Tektronix tried to buy Lindos, and when I resisted some Tektronix workers left and formed AP - see Lindos site

4547:, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply 3129: 1467: 717:

The syntax for backlink has been updated to be used like this: {{backlink|Pagename}}. Please update all instances of the template accordingly. Thanks. —

406:, since lots of incoming links will have to be fixed (by a bot prorbably, which is a waste of editor's time and messes with your watchlist as you noted) 2863:. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the 2804:. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the 100:

Yeah, I meant that mine was a lot of work. :-) It's ok, though, as long as yours is accurate and it seems to be consistent format as your other ones.

4616: 3712: 3563: 3522: 633:

I have removed the root page template from electrical engineering. I feel that the template is unappealing and adds little but confusion to the page.

583:

has been abandoned. There are other ways to indicate that an article is important, such as article series templates etc. Linking it prominently from

3708: 3703:

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Knowledge to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you

2270:

Lindos invented, like segmented sequence testing, which is a de-facto world standard, it is fair to regard Lindos as the 'official site' for these.

4482:

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

3512: 2918: 1146:

Well, it looks v. good to me but we must see what other users reactions are before we congratulate ourselves too much. I have been whizzing round

309:, which is in the article namespace, is for an encyclopedia article. It should be blank, ready for someone to come along and create a new article. 65: 1664:

That's fine, but plugging a specific company's method or product is considered bad form on Knowledge, unless it's especially notable. Plugging

3966: 3663: 3623: 3431: 3371: 3113: 2868: 2809: 352:

Also, don't worry about editors having trouble finding your new guidleline. It's obvious (with a little experience) that it will be located at

49: 3508: 1431:

No problem! But I was the one who made the last edit to PLD, and my audit-trail comment was "Revert vandal", so when I saw your version had a

3559: 3518: 3125: 3005: 1456: 1466:" at the start of this article. The rationale for this is inscrutable to me, so I removed it. If you would like to comment, please do so on 762:

Then ask yourself if there is something equivalent (link to root-type article near top of page). Then, if you see what I'm seeing, create a

4450: 4186: 4113: 3875: 2972: 2439: 1175:

Yes you are right in my opinion , but we must not get too carried away until we have approval from other editors, Then, we can celebrate!--

318:

A reader shouldn't have to deal with the inner-workings of Knowledge if all they want to do read an article. This is why a redirect from

129:

Yeah, it would be trivial to add the extra gridlines or output SVG, but the SVG rendering of gnuplot's output looks pretty poor (compare

3715:. However, even if you use one of these processes to release copyrighted material to Knowledge, it still needs to comply with the other 3402: 2227:

As much as I've enjoyed reading the articles you've written, I would have to agree with Alistair on this point - appearances do count.--

25:

to Knowledge! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

3772: 377: 1903:

how to separate the names so as not to conflict with present parametric interpretation). I need software/template experts to help. --

68:

on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out

4241:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Knowledge's 3716: 994: 892: 69: 3462: 3389: 3375: 124:

this evening, which was flagged for attention. Amazing how many terms you can Wikify in an article like that and see come up blue!.

4543:

In accordance with our policy that Knowledge is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia

343:. So I guess you can (or ask me if you like) make the redirect, even though I think it's unprofessional and confusing for readers. 4029: 3552:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to

3343: 2966: 4446: 4182: 4109: 3970: 3871: 3161: 3117: 2872: 2848: 2813: 2789: 2600: 2583: 2340:

should be added on the Talk page of whichever article and leave it to other editors to decide whether to include them or not.

2091: 1681: 1491: 3515:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 3449: 3435: 4308:. This is a philosophy I would subscribe to. Of course, there are many other philosophies about article inclusion thresholds. 3945: 3556:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 2935: 2141:

Sites with other meaningful, relevant content that is not suitable for inclusion in an article, such as textbooks or reviews.

2061:

has been upsetting the lede section and many images. Do you have any suggestions on how we might overcome these objections?--

232: 2717:- Famous schizophrenic who wrote a book on her experiences with'. But what do you think should be added after the 'with'? 174:

Well done, thanks! I'm sure we'll continue cleaning up all this, there are quite a few sub-pages that still need some work (

3215:

I will look forward to any comments you have, either on my user talk page, or on the discussion pages of the two articles.

2962: 3092: 1505: 4421: 4165: 4092: 3854: 3643: 2554: 2111: 1276: 767: 34: 22: 3147:

Please be more careful: in your recent edits you added several links to disambiguation pages, and added an unnecessary

2544:

I just wanted to say thank you for all your graphs. They're really nice looking and help make the articles clearer. —

1265:

creation of hierarchy that I've mentioned at other spots. I hope the templates can be carefully designed to avoid that.

4433: 4177: 4104: 3958: 3906: 3866: 3238:, discovered after a few days away from my PC. I will give some thought to some edits of my own to the two articles. 3105: 3058: 3036: 3012: 2844: 2785: 2609: 2592: 1961:

I processed most of the CSD's, but some of the template were in use. Please wrap template CSD's in <noinclude: -->

1673: 3198:

my site). However I have many interests, and I was not at present considering becoming a seasoned Knowledge editor!

1225:

Please don't test in live articles. Your test templates are confusing and seem unrelated to the article contents. --

656:. I have crossed swords with these two in the past and Im sure they will use this opportunity to exact revenge/spite. 424:) double redirects will be created which will have to be fixed (again, probably by a bot, lighting up your watchlist) 4245:

and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.

2103: 895:

member I am also concerned with the proper (heirarchical) organisation of pages probably under topic headings (like

3962: 3753: 3109: 2953: 2021: 1346:

can go elsewhere, with a full description of the physics, and of course the two can link via 'see also'. Similarly

1918: 661:

We must therefore gather more supporters to back our idea if it is not to be smothered at birth by these people.--

4620: 4537: 4515: 4476: 4464: 4206: 4198: 3902: 3888: 3697: 2860: 2852: 2793: 2436: 1740: 1719: 1697: 1693: 1615: 1395: 1302: 1275:

First, templates at the top of the page seem to be favored in very tightly tied together series of articles like

510:) template. However I don't think the line adds anything - the article can, and should, stand without it. Thanks/ 54: 2212:

Sorry but when you contribute to Knowledge that does not entitle you to promote your company. Again please read

3800: 3650: 3553: 3262: 3141: 3054: 3040: 2943: 2356: 2308: 2213: 2184: 2129: 2099: 1948: 1744: 1098:

This prevents the reader from having to sort through a long list of items unrelated to his goal. best regards,

1017: 618:

electricity). How is this different from your approach? No one has commented on my hub page notes until today.

443: 3355:

Yes, it's the 40-phon curve, corresponding to the chosen level that the A-weighting is supposed to represent.

2925:

policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure

115:

graphs don't have, makes for more accurate reading, and of course vector form means they can be blown up big.

3495:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

2978: 2840: 2829: 1669: 1589: 192:

Thank you, I've been working away in the hope that it would be appreciated! I've just finished applying the

805: 772: 731: 719: 680: 507: 160:

sure it was published at least as early as 1921) but it is good to have these things in writing. Thanks. --

4209:, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from 4033: 3339: 3243: 3220: 2492: 2488: 2455: 451: 447: 29: 4492:

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at

2626:

for deletion, it simply thought the removal of the AfD notice (being most of the page) was vandalism. --

2072: 1614:

retains what might be perceived as some bias, but then it is intended to balance the existing article at

134: 130: 4409: 4267: 4153: 4080: 3842: 3719:

to be eligible for inclusion. If you would like any assistance with this, you can ask a question at the

2372: 2341: 2315: 2217: 2188: 2152: 2115: 1865:

However, its the understanding that matters, and I'm glad you agree that my contributions make sense. --

1398:. I did this because you apparently had more in your paste buffer than you thought: the contents of the 1359:

as a collective, and to navigate easily between them. Yesterday I wanted to refresh my understanding of

61: 3268: 1347: 1075: 1049:

i have little concern for how the electronics side is managed...my issue is to have a quick way out of

891:

be able to whizz around electronics 400 ,articles say, woth minimim mousework and eyestrain. Also as A

707: 4016:, in this book (Chapter 11, Figure 11.8). Could we please have your permission for this? Thank you. 2801: 2228: 2025: 1692:

article. Other variations on measurement methods should be included in the same way. Any attempt to

1335: 4612: 4597: 4575: 4504: 4493: 4234: 4025: 3736: 3671: 3335: 3331: 3282: 2876: 2817: 1527: 430: 421: 262: 1343: 235:. It will be useful to get this out to a larger audience so it can either prosper or sink :) Thanks/ 4544: 3974: 3720: 3121: 2998: 2605: 2588: 2564: 2465: 2035: 1980: 1914: 1523: 1010: 580: 417: 353: 323: 254: 224: 205: 201: 193: 4578:. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. 2859:

notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on

2800:

notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on

1371:

and six similar concepts which I had been told were relevant here. Instead I got a nav-box headed

785:

Ambush, Do you mean put the backlink in the text as opposed to standing alone like a sore thumb?--

4316: 4301: 4249: 3982: 3748: 3659: 3627: 3590: 2930: 2721:

It refers to the next line 'Joseph Berke'. Now changed to co-authored with to avoid ambiguity. --

2148: 2062: 2003: 1970: 1235: 1176: 1151: 1124: 1087: 1083: 998: 972: 940: 910: 844: 828: 786: 694: 662: 596: 566: 548: 44: 2058: 947: 2933:. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 1487: 403: 319: 306: 258: 250: 4392: 4140: 4067: 3941: 3927:

While all constructive contributions to Knowledge are appreciated, content or articles may be

3829: 3811: 3761: 3613: 3538: 3320:(I could not find an e-mail address so I'm posting my question here) I have a question about: 3239: 3216: 3088: 3026: 2926: 2442: 1502: 1270:

I'll also point out some other things I see about templates like this, for your consideration.

541: 409:

When someone rolls their mouse over the "shortened form" in most browsers, the incorrect URL (

4266:

Hi Peter, first of all apologies for the late response. I have also seen the conversation on

3786: 1363:

but when I went to the page it had no useful links to let me navigate back and forth between

4642: 4586: 4533: 4486: 4440: 4405: 4149: 4076: 3838: 3711:. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see 3662:, requesting that it be deleted from Knowledge. This has been done under two or more of the 3571: 3205: 3067: 2698: 2666: 1937: 1913:

Well, prompted by your message, I have now started a new naming system, and specified it at

1892: 1538: 1399: 1226: 896: 653: 503: 340: 175: 161: 138: 4420:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 4164:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 4091:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 3853:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 4500: 4472: 4357: 3356: 3298: 3278: 2891: 2761: 2722: 2573: 2531: 2496: 2474: 2390: 2330: 2283: 2203: 2166: 2090:

Please do not add commercial links (or links to your own private websites) to Knowledge.

2040: 1984: 1952: 1922: 1904: 1866: 1764: 1753: 1723: 1648: 1619: 1593: 1572: 1419: 1381: 1316: 1250: 1213: 1202: 1194: 1164: 1109: 1071: 1054: 1033: 993:

A discussion on organisation and navigating Electronics articles has just started over on

982: 874: 675: 524: 490: 455: 382: 273: 209: 183: 91: 73: 965:

page could have a series box if necessary. How does this idea fit with your requirements?

2296:

This isn't a place for you to promote the articles you have written for another website.

4417: 4271: 4161: 4088: 3850: 3496: 3235: 3194: 3189:

As creator of the Studio 'E' One-valve Radio web site that is cited by the articles on

3172: 2864: 2805: 2545: 2446: 2095: 2076: 1768: 1757: 1701: 1677: 1630: 1604: 1558: 1546: 1480: 1249:

the template stands as valid if you care not to take note of what is going on here. --

1198: 1094:

matters go to (WHATEVER Lindosland, Light Current, Shift and others wish to call this).

145: 105: 39: 4306:

verifiability or notability are more important than the subject's perceived importance

200:

and realised would work well here. There's now a description of what this is about at

4529: 4413: 4242: 4157: 4084: 3978: 3928: 3919: 3915: 3846: 3732: 3679: 3604:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

3529:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

3453: 3393: 3231: 3190: 3151: 3075: 2922: 2910: 2836: 2777: 2405: 2401: 1998: 1965: 1495: 865:

too hard to look through. The serial nature of Root links can solve this wonderfully.

592: 588: 563: 545: 499: 475: 4280: 4220: 4214: 4210: 3757: 3609: 3605: 3534: 3530: 3022: 2740: 2687: 2644: 1983:

and then realised why and put the correct templates in place! I'm getting there! --

1499: 1471: 1280: 534: 442:

YES, after due consideration I agree. Please note that, following a suggestion on

416:

Redirects can be trouble. They use a bit of server resources and also, if the page

4384: 4131: 4058: 3820: 2665:. This explains the sudden rise of "mental illnesses", especially among children. 3074:

While all contributions to Knowledge are appreciated, content or articles may be

4638: 4582: 4230: 4226: 3752:

tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with

3504: 3452:

requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge. This has been done under

3392:

requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge. This has been done under

2781: 2770: 2714: 2691: 2627: 2511: 2216:. Particularly points 3, 4 and 9 and the NOTE under "Links to normally avoid". 2187:. Particularly points 3, 4 and 9 and the NOTE under "Links to normally avoid". 1933: 1888: 1444: 1409: 1372: 1351: 1339: 1327: 1150:

with no trouble at all! I hope others users like the system as much as I do!. --

1147: 1099: 1021: 649: 639: 3694:. Knowledge takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators 1588:

Hi Omegatron. I see you have challenged the accuracy of the page I created on

402:

By using the "shortened" from you stop someone from creating a real article at

391:

How did I make a mess of your watchlist? By listing lots of entries? That's ok.

3500: 2939:

article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the

2613: 2596: 1749: 1739:

Quite the opposite, actually; forking controversial topics is forbidden. See

1542: 1091: 950:

box (different on each sub page of course) that allows you to navigate deeper.

511: 479: 236: 179: 3951:

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing

3293: 3265:- This states it was obtained from the internet, was it from a specific site? 3098:

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing

1668:

company is definitely taboo, as are soapboxes, axe grinding, and so on. See

4284: 3168: 3167:. Please don't create work for other people to tidy up after your editing. 2736: 1993:

No problem. To see if it is in use, go to the template page, then click on

1360: 1134: 178:

being one I created, the only one with a timeline of animation styles.) --

3224: 2151:. Our rules are quite clear on users promoting their own interests here. 376:

You might like to look at my other suggestion, which I have just put up on

4528:

Hello, Lindosland. It has been over six months since you last edited the

3642:

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read

2279: 2057:

We've had a number of comments and reversions becuase the placing of the

1826: 1376: 1368: 1364: 824: 4646: 4590: 4508: 4454: 4424:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

4365: 4319: 4252: 4190: 4168:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

4117: 4095:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

4037: 3986: 3879: 3857:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

3805: 3778: 3765: 3617: 3542: 3485: 3425: 3364: 3347: 3306: 3286: 3247: 3176: 3135: 3030: 2905: 2894: 2879: 2820: 2764: 2743: 2725: 2700: 2669: 2647: 2630: 2616: 2576: 2548: 2534: 2514: 2499: 2477: 2449: 2412: 2393: 2375: 2344: 2333: 2318: 2286: 2231: 2220: 2206: 2191: 2169: 2155: 2118: 2079: 2065: 2043: 2028: 2005: 1997:

in the left nav bar. Feel free to relist them after they are unused. —

1987: 1972: 1955: 1941: 1925: 1907: 1896: 1869: 1771: 1726: 1704: 1651: 1633: 1622: 1607: 1596: 1575: 1561: 1549: 1530: 1508: 1474: 1447: 1422: 1412: 1384: 1319: 1253: 1238: 1229: 1216: 1205: 1179: 1167: 1154: 1127: 1112: 1102: 1036: 1024: 1020:

page. we may need a vote or final concensus on this merge idea, cheers

1001: 985: 975: 913: 877: 847: 831: 809: 789: 776: 735: 723: 697: 684: 665: 642: 601: 569: 551: 527: 514: 493: 482: 458: 446:, which I agree has a good basis, the preferred term looks likely to be 433: 385: 276: 265: 239: 212: 186: 164: 148: 108: 94: 76: 4402:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

1644: 3743:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may

2427:

sections, so I figured I'd point out that most places say to put them

1197:. Wait until you're committed to your ideas as a permanent edit, then 4268:

Knowledge talk:Drafts#Problem with Drafts - loss of important history

3596: 3581: 2241:

3 Links that are added to promote a site. See External link spamming.

1355: 410: 336: 3727:

It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company,

3675: 2713:

you added very useful See Also's. But the article currently reads '

1537:

carefully so that they complement the article. You placed boxes in

3922:. Content relates more to historical estate than the actual school. 3321: 2440:

Knowledge:Manual_of_Style_(headings)#Standard_headings_and_ordering

2307:

Lastly, the normal procedure for situations like this is listed on

293:

To provide infrastructure to improve the encyclopedia (seen in the

4011: 3212:

Wiki-blunders in terms of syntax, etiquette or false assumptions.

2369:

to include it, or include the information directly in the article.

1463: 1288: 1284: 1138: 1050: 648:

Looks like we now have some opposition from 2 of my arch emenies:

468: 197: 121: 3324:

Which of the ISO 226:2003 curves is shown here? The 40-phon one?

693:

Past experience precludes positive assumptions. Once bitten....--

290:

To provide a working encyclopedia (seen in the article namespace)

4437:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 3577: 498:

In which case if it must be put back can I ask you read through

4427:

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review

4171:

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review

4098:

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review

3860:

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review

943:

that you are in now and thro which you can nav at the top level

2683: 1763:

All that said, thanks for all your contributions so far. The

1689: 584: 3785:

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect

3258:

Free images for which more information would be appreciated:

2875:, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. 2816:, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. 137:

for instance) and my PNG is 1600x1600, so it can be blown up

4520: 3893: 3777: 3737:

see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable

3707:

verify that externally by one of the processes explained at

3632: 3440: 3380: 3045: 2867:, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the 2808:, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the 2909:

Hello Lindosland! Thank you for your contributions. I am a

1402:

article (or some such) became melded with the PLD article.

2855:). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the 2796:). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the 2275:

independantly, with discussions on the talk at each page.

2252:

4 Sites that primarily exist to sell products or services.

4008:

We are hoping to include the attached picture of yours:

4003: 2423:

I don't think it's terribly important, but you're moving

1354:

and cover existing robots and techniques brjoadly, while

729:

I've finished the change. No further action necessary. —

454:

though, just to get the links in my text to turn blue. --

4548: 4396:

is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All

4225:

Information that can't be referenced should be removed (

3914:

Primary schools generally not considered notable; fails

3466:

to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for

3406:

to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for

2657:

Re.: Your comment at the Mental Health Talk page. Go to

1921:(see the Talk page for my reasoning). Is that better? -- 4611:

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

4549: 4408:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the

4152:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the

4079:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the

3969:

process can result in deletion without discussion, and

3841:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the

3499:, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages 3230:

Hi Lindosland. Thanks for the welcome and comments re

3116:

process can result in deletion without discussion, and

2711: 2658: 1519: 1133:

I've done a lot,but I've finished now on the two topic

228: 3934:

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the

3081:

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the

2997: 1618:. I've left the other template, pending discussion. -- 1234:

What do you find confusing about the templates Bill?--

502:

and take heed of it's concerns - wrap the text in a {{

1189:

Hi Lindosland. Please don't use the live articles to

4615:

is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge according to

3735:.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please 2608:. If you oppose the deletion of an article, you may 2591:. If you oppose the deletion of an article, you may 1947:

I have described this in a section I added today at

1066:

the disamb two way split could read something like:

1053:to get you to either (a) atmospheric acoustics {eg 2917:of the articles that you created is tagged as an 253:in Knowledge and change them to ] (looks the same: 2843:, suggesting that it be deleted according to the 2784:, suggesting that it be deleted according to the 2599:11:38, 16 April 2006 (UTC)#Please do not remove 2487:I am now struggling to put right a problem with 1494:; addressing the reader/editor is inappropriate 4628:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Programme level 3680:section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion 3640: 3204:I note too, that in your short addition to the 2612:at the respective page instead. Thank you. -- 2595:at the respective page instead. Thank you. -- 1886:Could you have not picked more suitable names? 1718:prefer to then fork, hence my fresh start with 1394:Hi! I reverted the change you recently made to 4012:https://commons.wikimedia.org/File:Lindos1.svg 3733:section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion 3454:section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion 3394:section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion 4581:Thank you for your submission to Knowledge! 3548:Disambiguation link notification for April 24 3491:Disambiguation link notification for April 30 3390:File:IEC 98 (1984) Rumble weighting curve.svg 3376:File:IEC 98 (1984) Rumble weighting curve.svg 3011: 2437:Knowledge:Guide_to_Layout#Standard_appendices 8: 249:I've had my bot go through all instances of 72:or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! 3793:redirect, you might want to participate in 2371:Please do not restore the links yourself. 1074:or airborne longitudinal sound waves go to 4379: 4023: 3789:. Since you had some involvement with the 3294:http://www.amren.com/ar/2000/01/index.html 1468:Talk:Cosmic microwave background radiation 591:etc may also achieve the desired success. 229:Knowledge:Village pump (policy)#Root pages 60:I hope you enjoy editing here and being a 4489:of the content if it meets requirements. 3713:Knowledge:Requesting copyright permission 2919:Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person 2663:Mental Health Writers' Ties To Big Pharma 478:, which is an accepted guideline. Thanks/ 233:Knowledge talk:Manual of Style#Root pages 4233:on Knowledge). I've moved your draft to 3709:Knowledge:Donating copyrighted materials 3450:File:IEC 386 (Blk) Flutter weighting.svg 3436:File:IEC 386 (Blk) Flutter weighting.svg 3322:http://en.wikipedia.org/File:Lindos3.svg 3066:Elementary schools generally don't meet 2138:inappropriate for the Knowledge article. 1931:What do you mean by automated creation? 924:Jus t thought, Each sub page would have 429:Do you agree to use the full link now?-- 208:idea and help put the links in place. -- 3940:notice, but please explain why in your 3644:the guide to writing your first article 3087:notice, but please explain why in your 2682:Hi there, I'm currently working on the 144:And yes, WP is super addicting. :-) — 3157:tag (it already had a specific tag of 2525:RE: Root Page concept - help us please 1694:measure the quality of an audio system 285:Ok. Knowledge has two operating modes: 4475:. I just wanted to let you know that 4300:When I patrol articles, I often cite 2929:, all biographies should be based on 2739:Your help greatly appreciated :-) -- 2294:I really do want these articles read. 2071:See our discussion above in section " 1457:cosmic microwave background radiation 7: 4393:2019 Arbitration Committee elections 4141:2018 Arbitration Committee elections 4068:2017 Arbitration Committee elections 3830:2016 Arbitration Committee elections 1283:or the "Lighting" box at the end of 1082:For issues pertaining to electronic 4617:Knowledge's policies and guidelines 3992:Permission to use figure in a book. 3754:Knowledge's policies and guidelines 3649:You may want to consider using the 3327:Thanks in advance for clarifying. 2686:article and trying to get it up to 2572:about the bot and this warning. // 2473:about the bot and this warning. // 2443:Knowledge:Section#Appendix_sections 378:Knowledge: village pump (proposals) 4376:ArbCom 2019 election voter message 4279:consider a local interest blog as 4125:ArbCom 2018 election voter message 4052:ArbCom 2017 election voter message 3929:deleted for any of several reasons 3909:because of the following concern: 3797:if you have not already done so. 3076:deleted for any of several reasons 3061:because of the following concern: 2555:Psychotherapy: a Personal Approach 2400:should not be included at all per 411:http://en.wikipeddia.org/Root_page 14: 4625:The article will be discussed at 4205:An article you recently created, 4138:Hello, Lindosland. Voting in the 4065:Hello, Lindosland. Voting in the 3827:Hello, Lindosland. Voting in the 3676:http://www.repancobartlett.co.uk/ 995:Knowledge:WikiProject Electronics 893:Knowledge:WikiProject_Electronics 757:is (don't marry your procedures). 70:Knowledge:Where to ask a question 4605: 4383: 4130: 4057: 3819: 3271:-Possible duplicate of previous? 3182:Some suggestions from Studio 'E' 3126:The Blade of the Northern Lights 2904: 1767:articles are much better now. — 1032:Thanks, I've commented there. -- 748:an use it - I like writing best. 245:Root page vs Knowledge:Root page 4431:and submit your choices on the 4175:and submit your choices on the 4102:and submit your choices on the 2237:Yes, I read those references:- 1758:surviving on only air and light 1682:Knowledge:What Knowledge is not 1492:Knowledge:Avoid self-references 1016:see the latest comments on the 4499:Thank you for your attention. 4366:12:36, 29 September 2019 (UTC) 4320:07:17, 28 September 2019 (UTC) 4253:20:26, 24 September 2019 (UTC) 2706:in Ronald David Laing#See_also 1301:link in the template leads to 1259:Comment on the template itself 223:FYI I posted a wee pointer to 1: 4455:00:05, 19 November 2019 (UTC) 4410:Knowledge arbitration process 4191:18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC) 4154:Knowledge arbitration process 4081:Knowledge arbitration process 3880:22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC) 3843:Knowledge arbitration process 3463:the page's talk page directly 3403:the page's talk page directly 2923:biographies of living persons 2726:00:16, 10 November 2006 (UTC) 2110:to the encyclopedia. See the 2022:Category:Noise quantification 946:Underneath, there is another 736:03:08, 28 February 2006 (UTC) 724:02:59, 28 February 2006 (UTC) 698:07:39, 28 February 2006 (UTC) 685:03:21, 28 February 2006 (UTC) 666:00:16, 28 February 2006 (UTC) 643:23:36, 27 February 2006 (UTC) 602:14:34, 12 February 2006 (UTC) 386:23:20, 31 December 2005 (UTC) 335:Having said that, I see that 277:21:59, 31 December 2005 (UTC) 266:21:37, 31 December 2005 (UTC) 240:01:48, 31 December 2005 (UTC) 219:Root pages @ the village pump 213:16:59, 30 December 2005 (UTC) 196:concept which I invented for 187:16:44, 30 December 2005 (UTC) 30:The five pillars of Knowledge 4243:general notability guideline 4118:18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC) 3987:09:25, 10 January 2017 (UTC) 3664:criteria for speedy deletion 3653:to help you create articles. 3486:21:07, 27 January 2012 (UTC) 3460:deleted. You can also visit 3426:21:05, 27 January 2012 (UTC) 3400:deleted. You can also visit 3365:14:01, 29 October 2011 (UTC) 3348:16:22, 13 October 2011 (UTC) 3307:14:11, 29 October 2011 (UTC) 3177:20:18, 6 February 2011 (UTC) 3136:01:47, 5 February 2011 (UTC) 3031:05:17, 16 January 2010 (UTC) 2839:}}" template to the article 2780:}}" template to the article 2744:12:35, 2 November 2006 (UTC) 2661:, then see a article titled 1919:Template:Branchlist/Root/Hub 1342:with the slant on uses, but 1292:also and reference sections. 1287:). I dislike the example in 1277:History of the English penny 1185:Testing in the live articles 768:History of the United States 636:I hope you will understand. 570:17:31, 6 February 2006 (UTC) 552:11:40, 6 February 2006 (UTC) 528:22:35, 12 January 2006 (UTC) 515:22:31, 12 January 2006 (UTC) 494:22:24, 12 January 2006 (UTC) 483:22:10, 12 January 2006 (UTC) 165:00:57, 6 December 2005 (UTC) 149:02:15, 5 December 2005 (UTC) 109:01:44, 5 December 2005 (UTC) 95:01:35, 5 December 2005 (UTC) 77:02:57, 24 October 2005 (UTC) 50:How to write a great article 4516:Draft:Erie Resistor Company 4477:Draft:Erie Resistor Company 4465:Draft:Erie Resistor Company 4038:09:15, 3 October 2017 (UTC) 3973:allows discussion to reach 3954:{{proposed deletion/dated}} 3937:{{proposed deletion/dated}} 3864:and submit your choices on 3120:allows discussion to reach 3101:{{proposed deletion/dated}} 3084:{{proposed deletion/dated}} 2853:Knowledge's deletion policy 2794:Knowledge's deletion policy 2132:- What should be linked to: 1674:Knowledge:Vanity guidelines 459:15:45, 6 January 2006 (UTC) 434:10:20, 1 January 2006 (UTC) 4662: 4447:MediaWiki message delivery 4183:MediaWiki message delivery 4110:MediaWiki message delivery 3965:exist. In particular, the 3872:MediaWiki message delivery 3862:the candidates' statements 3806:19:26, 7 August 2016 (UTC) 3766:03:24, 28 April 2016 (UTC) 3618:09:37, 24 April 2016 (UTC) 3543:11:53, 30 April 2013 (UTC) 3313:Question about Lindos3.svg 3248:13:35, 30 March 2011 (UTC) 3225:13:20, 10 March 2011 (UTC) 2954:David Smail (psychologist) 2949:tag. Here is the article: 2880:03:28, 17 April 2007 (UTC) 2765:18:24, 25 March 2007 (UTC) 2670:22:42, 23 April 2006 (UTC) 2648:16:32, 16 April 2006 (UTC) 2631:19:16, 20 April 2006 (UTC) 2617:11:38, 16 April 2006 (UTC) 2577:11:35, 16 April 2006 (UTC) 2570:frequently asked questions 2549:01:15, 16 April 2006 (UTC) 2471:frequently asked questions 2114:to learn more. Thanks. 2053:Branchlist placing on page 1956:23:39, 31 March 2006 (UTC) 1942:14:10, 31 March 2006 (UTC) 1926:13:25, 31 March 2006 (UTC) 1908:11:16, 31 March 2006 (UTC) 1897:20:58, 30 March 2006 (UTC) 1870:11:37, 30 March 2006 (UTC) 1772:05:41, 30 March 2006 (UTC) 1727:17:39, 29 March 2006 (UTC) 1705:05:41, 30 March 2006 (UTC) 1652:17:39, 29 March 2006 (UTC) 1634:17:16, 29 March 2006 (UTC) 1623:13:01, 29 March 2006 (UTC) 1608:17:16, 29 March 2006 (UTC) 1597:12:15, 29 March 2006 (UTC) 1576:21:19, 29 March 2006 (UTC) 1562:19:27, 29 March 2006 (UTC) 1550:04:43, 28 March 2006 (UTC) 1531:01:42, 28 March 2006 (UTC) 1509:00:00, 23 March 2006 (UTC) 1490:)". Please have a look at 1475:21:36, 16 March 2006 (UTC) 766:somewhat like the kind at 614:copied from talk:hub page 4591:16:56, 1 April 2020 (UTC) 4509:01:35, 1 March 2020 (UTC) 3959:proposed deletion process 3903:Firs Estate School, Derby 3889:Firs Estate School, Derby 3686:, but not as a source of 3670:It appears to be a clear 3658:A tag has been placed on 3595:added a link pointing to 3448:A tag has been placed on 3388:A tag has been placed on 3287:10:20, 30 June 2011 (UTC) 3263:File:Lothrop Stoddard.png 3106:proposed deletion process 2865:proposed deletion process 2821:02:45, 6 April 2007 (UTC) 2806:proposed deletion process 2701:06:00, 13 July 2006 (UTC) 2535:21:55, 6 April 2006 (UTC) 2515:14:52, 6 April 2006 (UTC) 2500:11:45, 6 April 2006 (UTC) 2478:11:40, 6 April 2006 (UTC) 2450:06:05, 4 April 2006 (UTC) 2413:09:59, 5 April 2006 (UTC) 2394:22:55, 4 April 2006 (UTC) 2376:19:46, 4 April 2006 (UTC) 2345:00:49, 4 April 2006 (UTC) 2334:11:22, 3 April 2006 (UTC) 2319:00:36, 3 April 2006 (UTC) 2287:20:20, 2 April 2006 (UTC) 2232:18:49, 2 April 2006 (UTC) 2221:18:32, 2 April 2006 (UTC) 2207:17:59, 2 April 2006 (UTC) 2192:17:51, 2 April 2006 (UTC) 2170:17:38, 2 April 2006 (UTC) 2156:17:14, 2 April 2006 (UTC) 2119:21:52, 1 April 2006 (UTC) 2080:01:40, 2 April 2006 (UTC) 2066:21:35, 1 April 2006 (UTC) 2044:18:05, 1 April 2006 (UTC) 2029:17:43, 1 April 2006 (UTC) 2006:14:00, 1 April 2006 (UTC) 1988:13:57, 1 April 2006 (UTC) 1973:13:53, 1 April 2006 (UTC) 1754:engines that run on water 1741:Knowledge:Content forking 1720:Audio quality measurement 1616:Audio system measurements 1498:for Knowledge articles. ~ 1448:15:34, 6 March 2006 (UTC) 1423:15:29, 6 March 2006 (UTC) 1413:13:55, 6 March 2006 (UTC) 1396:Programmable logic device 1390:Programmable logic device 1385:12:00, 7 March 2006 (UTC) 1320:04:52, 7 March 2006 (UTC) 1303:Military history of Japan 1254:00:43, 7 March 2006 (UTC) 1239:22:42, 6 March 2006 (UTC) 1230:18:56, 6 March 2006 (UTC) 1217:11:24, 6 March 2006 (UTC) 1206:05:24, 6 March 2006 (UTC) 1180:03:46, 6 March 2006 (UTC) 1168:03:43, 6 March 2006 (UTC) 1155:03:39, 6 March 2006 (UTC) 1128:03:06, 6 March 2006 (UTC) 1113:18:45, 5 March 2006 (UTC) 1103:18:23, 5 March 2006 (UTC) 1070:For issues pertaining to 1037:14:33, 5 March 2006 (UTC) 1025:03:51, 5 March 2006 (UTC) 1002:16:45, 5 March 2006 (UTC) 986:14:42, 5 March 2006 (UTC) 976:06:05, 2 March 2006 (UTC) 914:05:57, 2 March 2006 (UTC) 878:13:08, 1 March 2006 (UTC) 848:03:40, 1 March 2006 (UTC) 832:03:36, 1 March 2006 (UTC) 810:03:23, 1 March 2006 (UTC) 790:03:07, 1 March 2006 (UTC) 777:02:31, 1 March 2006 (UTC) 557:Sorry about spam-blocking 4647:14:41, 8 June 2024 (UTC) 4619:or whether it should be 4445:to your user talk page. 4361: 3773:Redirects for discussion 3692:say it in your own words 3690:. This part is crucial: 3576:added links pointing to 3360: 3302: 3142:Firs Estate School Derby 3055:Firs Estate School Derby 3041:Firs Estate School Derby 2869:speedy deletion criteria 2810:speedy deletion criteria 2357:Knowledge:External links 2309:Knowledge:External links 2214:Knowledge:External links 2185:Knowledge:External links 2130:Knowledge:external links 2098:or a mere collection of 1949:Knowledge talk:Root page 1700:, wouldn't you agree? — 1698:audio system measurement 1018:Talk:Environmental noise 444:Knowledge talk:Root page 4288:records offices, books. 3946:the article's talk page 3795:the redirect discussion 3717:policies and guidelines 3093:the article's talk page 2895:13:45, 8 May 2007 (UTC) 2688:Featured Article status 2678:BBC Research Department 2361:A website that you own 2351:Links to normally avoid 1670:Knowledge:Autobiography 257:). I have also deleted 227:and the MfD listing at 4525: 4004:http://vr.cs.uiuc.edu/ 3898: 3782: 3745:contest the nomination 3655: 3637: 3445: 3385: 3162:Derbyshire-school-stub 3050: 2841:Distortion measurement 2830:Distortion measurement 2493:Fletcher-Munson curves 2489:Fletcher-Munson curves 2456:Fletcher-Munson curves 1590:Distortion measurement 1584:Distortion measurement 533:Unsourced material in 452:Knowledge:Summary page 448:Knowledge:Summary page 21:Hello Lindosland, and 4538:Erie Resistor Company 4530:Articles for Creation 4524: 4406:Arbitration Committee 4390:Hello! Voting in the 4207:Erie Resistor Company 4199:Erie Resistor Company 4150:Arbitration Committee 4077:Arbitration Committee 3971:articles for deletion 3907:proposed for deletion 3897: 3887:Proposed deletion of 3839:Arbitration Committee 3812:ArbCom Elections 2016 3781: 3636: 3444: 3384: 3118:articles for deletion 3059:proposed for deletion 3049: 2873:Articles for Deletion 2871:or it can be sent to 2849:What Knowledge is not 2814:Articles for Deletion 2812:or it can be sent to 2790:What Knowledge is not 2659:Jeff Rense's Homepage 2601:Articles for deletion 2584:Articles for deletion 2582:Please do not remove 2102:. You are, however, 1882:Template:Branchlistxx 1462:Hi, you put "back to 1375:, and when I went to 4514:Your draft article, 3698:blocked from editing 3606:opt-out instructions 3554:disambiguation pages 3531:opt-out instructions 3292:I think it was from 2553:Your recent edit to 2454:Your recent edit to 770:. This I believe. — 764:Noise article series 422:Knowledge:Root pages 4550:edit the submission 4536:page you started, " 4237:(with a prefix of " 4215:independent sources 4201:moved to draftspace 4022:Adam Warkoczewski 3513:fix with Dab solver 2557:was reverted by an 2458:was reverted by an 2073:Knowledge:Root Page 2036:Knowledge:Root page 2015:Noise subcategories 1981:Knowledge:Root page 1962:</noinclude: --> 1915:Knowledge:Root page 1760:, antigravity, etc. 1524:Knowledge:Root page 1514:Knowledge:Root page 1118:Recent page changes 1011:Environmental noise 939:The top one is the 581:Knowledge:Root page 418:Knowledge:Root page 354:Knowledge:Root page 324:Knowledge:Root page 225:Knowledge:Root page 135:Image:waveforms.svg 131:Image:waveforms.png 4526: 4422:arbitration policy 4356:Best wishes, Pete 4231:central importance 4166:arbitration policy 4093:arbitration policy 3963:deletion processes 3899: 3855:arbitration policy 3814:: Voting now open! 3783: 3771:Xxx xxx listed at 3638: 3562:• Join us at the 3521:• Join us at the 3446: 3386: 3110:deletion processes 3051: 2913:alerting you that 2835:I have added a "{{ 2776:I have added a "{{ 2653:Re.Your Comment... 2483:Bot messed up page 2149:Lindos Electronics 2104:encouraged to add 35:How to edit a page 4461: 4460: 4224: 4040: 4028:comment added by 3996:Dear Lindosland, 3749:visiting the page 3567: 3526: 3351: 3334:comment added by 3269:File:Stoddard.gif 3037:Proposed deletion 3017: 2900:Unreferenced BLPs 2845:proposed deletion 2786:proposed deletion 2639:David Smail Books 1696:is inherently an 1348:Electronic robots 1123:changes.Thanks.-- 1076:Atmospheric sound 676:assume good faith 599: 542:Talk:Bates method 326:is inappropriate. 4653: 4609: 4608: 4570: 4569: 4564: 4563: 4558: 4557: 4552: 4523: 4485:You may request 4444: 4387: 4380: 4240: 4218: 4134: 4061: 3956: 3955: 3939: 3938: 3896: 3823: 3674:infringement of 3635: 3572:Jackson Brothers 3557: 3516: 3509:check to confirm 3481: 3443: 3421: 3383: 3350: 3328: 3186:Hi, Lindosland, 3181: 3166: 3160: 3156: 3150: 3132: 3103: 3102: 3086: 3085: 3048: 3016: 3015: 3001: 2957: 2948: 2942: 2931:reliable sources 2908: 2858: 2799: 2696: 2419:Section ordering 2409: 2373:AlistairMcMillan 2342:AlistairMcMillan 2316:AlistairMcMillan 2218:AlistairMcMillan 2189:AlistairMcMillan 2153:AlistairMcMillan 2116:AlistairMcMillan 2108:instead of links 2092:Knowledge is not 2001: 1968: 1940: 1895: 1539:Compact Cassette 1400:Digital circuits 1336:Photoelectronics 897:electronic noise 808: 806:Ambush Commander 775: 773:Ambush Commander 734: 732:Ambush Commander 722: 720:Ambush Commander 712: 706: 683: 681:Ambush Commander 654:User:Wtshymanski 597: 341:Knowledge:Revert 296: 176:Animated cartoon 155:Stoddard picture 82:Weighting curves 4661: 4660: 4656: 4655: 4654: 4652: 4651: 4650: 4636: 4613:Programme level 4610: 4606: 4602: 4598:Programme level 4567: 4566: 4561: 4560: 4555: 4554: 4553:and remove the 4521: 4519: 4469: 4438: 4378: 4315: 4248: 4238: 4203: 4195: 4194: 4135: 4127: 4122: 4121: 4062: 4054: 4017: 3994: 3967:speedy deletion 3953: 3952: 3936: 3935: 3894: 3892: 3884: 3883: 3867:the voting page 3824: 3816: 3803: 3776: 3656: 3633: 3631: 3624:Speedy deletion 3564:DPL WikiProject 3550: 3523:DPL WikiProject 3493: 3479: 3441: 3439: 3432:Speedy deletion 3419: 3381: 3379: 3372:Speedy deletion 3329: 3315: 3256: 3206:Boy's Own Paper 3184: 3164: 3158: 3154: 3148: 3145: 3130: 3114:speedy deletion 3100: 3099: 3083: 3082: 3046: 3044: 2958: 2946: 2944:unreferencedBLP 2940: 2902: 2877:Alfred Centauri 2856: 2833: 2818:Alfred Centauri 2797: 2774: 2751: 2746: 2708: 2692: 2680: 2655: 2641: 2542: 2527: 2485: 2421: 2407: 2353: 2088: 2055: 2017: 1999: 1995:What links here 1966: 1932: 1887: 1884: 1765:noise weighting 1745:well-referenced 1586: 1528:Commander Keane 1516: 1484: 1460: 1392: 1261: 1187: 1120: 1072:Noise pollution 1055:Noise pollution 1014: 804: 771: 744: 730: 718: 715: 710: 704: 679: 630:Hi Lindosland, 628: 612: 579:The concept of 577: 559: 538: 472: 431:Commander Keane 294: 263:Commander Keane 247: 221: 172: 157: 84: 55:Manual of Style 19: 12: 11: 5: 4659: 4657: 4604: 4603: 4601: 4596:Nomination of 4594: 4532:submission or 4518: 4512: 4471:Hi there, I'm 4468: 4462: 4459: 4458: 4429:the candidates 4399:eligible users 4388: 4377: 4374: 4373: 4372: 4371: 4370: 4369: 4368: 4354: 4345: 4344: 4343: 4342: 4341: 4340: 4331: 4330: 4329: 4328: 4327: 4326: 4313: 4309: 4298: 4289: 4276: 4261: 4260: 4246: 4202: 4196: 4173:the candidates 4136: 4129: 4128: 4126: 4123: 4100:the candidates 4063: 4056: 4055: 4053: 4050: 4043: 4015: 3993: 3990: 3977:for deletion. 3957:will stop the 3925: 3924: 3891: 3885: 3825: 3818: 3817: 3815: 3809: 3804: 3799: 3775: 3769: 3741: 3740: 3725: 3651:Article Wizard 3639: 3630: 3626:nomination of 3621: 3602: 3601: 3600: 3599: 3587: 3586: 3585: 3584: 3549: 3546: 3497:Psychodynamics 3492: 3489: 3438: 3434:nomination of 3429: 3378: 3374:nomination of 3369: 3368: 3367: 3314: 3311: 3310: 3309: 3275: 3273: 3272: 3266: 3255: 3254:Image Concerns 3252: 3251: 3250: 3236:Fun with Radio 3195:Fun with Radio 3183: 3180: 3144: 3139: 3124:for deletion. 3104:will stop the 3072: 3071: 3043: 3034: 3019: 3018: 2901: 2898: 2888: 2887: 2857:{{dated prod}} 2832: 2827: 2825: 2798:{{dated prod}} 2773: 2768: 2750: 2747: 2738: 2734: 2733: 2731: 2729: 2728: 2707: 2704: 2679: 2676: 2654: 2651: 2640: 2637: 2636: 2635: 2634: 2633: 2620: 2619: 2541: 2538: 2526: 2523: 2522: 2521: 2520: 2519: 2518: 2517: 2484: 2481: 2420: 2417: 2416: 2415: 2352: 2349: 2348: 2347: 2322: 2321: 2304: 2303: 2298: 2297: 2272: 2271: 2266: 2265: 2260: 2259: 2254: 2253: 2249: 2248: 2243: 2242: 2235: 2234: 2224: 2223: 2199: 2198: 2197: 2196: 2195: 2194: 2175: 2174: 2173: 2172: 2159: 2158: 2143: 2142: 2139: 2134: 2133: 2100:external links 2094:a vehicle for 2087: 2084: 2083: 2082: 2054: 2051: 2049: 2047: 2046: 2016: 2013: 2011: 2009: 2008: 1976: 1975: 1945: 1944: 1917:, in the form 1911: 1910: 1883: 1880: 1879: 1878: 1877: 1876: 1875: 1874: 1873: 1872: 1856: 1855: 1854: 1853: 1852: 1851: 1850: 1849: 1838: 1837: 1836: 1835: 1834: 1833: 1832: 1831: 1815: 1814: 1813: 1812: 1811: 1810: 1809: 1808: 1797: 1796: 1795: 1794: 1793: 1792: 1791: 1790: 1779: 1778: 1777: 1776: 1775: 1774: 1761: 1732: 1731: 1730: 1729: 1712: 1711: 1710: 1709: 1708: 1707: 1685: 1678:Knowledge:Spam 1657: 1656: 1655: 1654: 1637: 1636: 1611: 1610: 1585: 1582: 1581: 1580: 1579: 1578: 1565: 1564: 1553: 1552: 1515: 1512: 1483: 1478: 1459: 1454: 1453: 1452: 1451: 1450: 1439: 1438: 1437: 1436: 1426: 1425: 1391: 1388: 1350:might go with 1344:Photoelectrics 1338:seems part of 1323: 1322: 1312: 1311: 1307: 1306: 1294: 1293: 1272: 1271: 1267: 1266: 1260: 1257: 1246: 1245: 1244: 1243: 1242: 1241: 1220: 1219: 1186: 1183: 1173: 1172: 1171: 1170: 1144: 1143: 1119: 1116: 1096: 1095: 1079: 1078: 1064: 1063: 1062: 1061: 1060: 1059: 1042: 1041: 1040: 1039: 1013: 1008: 1007: 1006: 1005: 1004: 969: 968: 967: 966: 956: 955: 954: 953: 952: 951: 944: 932: 931: 930: 929: 919: 918: 917: 916: 903: 902: 901: 900: 899:for instance). 885: 884: 883: 882: 881: 880: 870: 866: 862: 853: 852: 851: 850: 837: 836: 835: 834: 817: 816: 815: 814: 813: 812: 795: 794: 793: 792: 780: 779: 759: 758: 743: 740: 739: 738: 714: 702: 701: 700: 690: 689: 688: 687: 669: 668: 658: 657: 627: 624: 611: 608: 606: 576: 573: 558: 555: 537: 531: 520: 519: 518: 517: 471: 465: 464: 463: 462: 461: 437: 436: 426: 425: 420:moves (say to 414: 407: 399: 398: 393: 392: 374: 373: 372: 371: 370: 369: 360: 359: 358: 357: 347: 346: 345: 344: 330: 329: 328: 327: 313: 312: 311: 310: 301: 300: 299: 298: 291: 287: 286: 280: 279: 246: 243: 220: 217: 216: 215: 171: 168: 156: 153: 152: 151: 142: 126: 125: 112: 111: 101: 83: 80: 66:sign your name 58: 57: 52: 47: 42: 37: 32: 18: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 4658: 4649: 4648: 4644: 4640: 4633: 4630: 4629: 4622: 4618: 4614: 4599: 4595: 4593: 4592: 4588: 4584: 4579: 4577: 4572: 4551: 4546: 4541: 4539: 4535: 4531: 4517: 4513: 4511: 4510: 4506: 4502: 4497: 4495: 4494:WP:REFUND/G13 4490: 4488: 4483: 4480: 4478: 4474: 4466: 4463: 4457: 4456: 4452: 4448: 4442: 4436: 4435: 4430: 4425: 4423: 4419: 4415: 4411: 4407: 4401: 4400: 4395: 4394: 4389: 4386: 4382: 4381: 4375: 4367: 4363: 4359: 4355: 4351: 4350: 4349: 4348: 4347: 4346: 4337: 4336: 4335: 4334: 4333: 4332: 4323: 4322: 4321: 4318: 4317:Jake Brockman 4310: 4307: 4303: 4299: 4295: 4290: 4286: 4282: 4277: 4273: 4269: 4265: 4264: 4263: 4262: 4257: 4256: 4255: 4254: 4251: 4250:Jake Brockman 4244: 4236: 4232: 4228: 4227:verifiability 4222: 4216: 4212: 4208: 4200: 4197: 4193: 4192: 4188: 4184: 4180: 4179: 4174: 4169: 4167: 4163: 4159: 4155: 4151: 4146: 4143: 4142: 4133: 4124: 4120: 4119: 4115: 4111: 4107: 4106: 4101: 4096: 4094: 4090: 4086: 4082: 4078: 4073: 4070: 4069: 4060: 4051: 4049: 4045: 4041: 4039: 4035: 4031: 4027: 4020: 4014: 4013: 4009: 4006: 4005: 4001: 3997: 3991: 3989: 3988: 3984: 3980: 3976: 3972: 3968: 3964: 3960: 3949: 3947: 3943: 3932: 3930: 3923: 3921: 3917: 3912: 3911: 3910: 3908: 3904: 3890: 3886: 3882: 3881: 3877: 3873: 3869: 3868: 3863: 3858: 3856: 3852: 3848: 3844: 3840: 3835: 3832: 3831: 3822: 3813: 3810: 3808: 3807: 3802: 3798: 3796: 3792: 3788: 3780: 3774: 3770: 3768: 3767: 3763: 3759: 3755: 3750: 3746: 3738: 3734: 3730: 3726: 3724: 3722: 3718: 3714: 3710: 3706: 3700: 3699: 3693: 3689: 3685: 3681: 3677: 3673: 3669: 3668: 3667: 3665: 3661: 3654: 3652: 3647: 3645: 3629: 3625: 3622: 3620: 3619: 3615: 3611: 3607: 3598: 3594: 3593: 3592: 3589: 3588: 3583: 3579: 3575: 3574: 3573: 3570: 3569: 3568: 3565: 3561: 3555: 3547: 3545: 3544: 3540: 3536: 3532: 3527: 3524: 3520: 3514: 3510: 3506: 3502: 3498: 3490: 3488: 3487: 3483: 3482: 3476: 3475: 3469: 3465: 3464: 3457: 3455: 3451: 3437: 3433: 3430: 3428: 3427: 3423: 3422: 3416: 3415: 3409: 3405: 3404: 3397: 3395: 3391: 3377: 3373: 3370: 3366: 3362: 3358: 3354: 3353: 3352: 3349: 3345: 3341: 3337: 3333: 3325: 3323: 3318: 3312: 3308: 3304: 3300: 3295: 3291: 3290: 3289: 3288: 3284: 3280: 3276: 3270: 3267: 3264: 3261: 3260: 3259: 3253: 3249: 3245: 3241: 3237: 3233: 3232:Gilbert Davey 3229: 3228: 3227: 3226: 3222: 3218: 3213: 3209: 3207: 3202: 3199: 3196: 3192: 3191:Gilbert Davey 3187: 3179: 3178: 3174: 3170: 3163: 3153: 3143: 3140: 3138: 3137: 3133: 3127: 3123: 3119: 3115: 3111: 3107: 3096: 3094: 3090: 3079: 3077: 3070: 3069: 3064: 3063: 3062: 3060: 3056: 3042: 3038: 3035: 3033: 3032: 3028: 3024: 3014: 3010: 3007: 3004: 3000: 2996: 2992: 2989: 2986: 2983: 2980: 2977: 2974: 2971: 2968: 2964: 2961: 2960:Find sources: 2955: 2952: 2951: 2950: 2945: 2938: 2937: 2932: 2928: 2927:verifiability 2924: 2920: 2916: 2912: 2907: 2899: 2897: 2896: 2893: 2884: 2883: 2882: 2881: 2878: 2874: 2870: 2866: 2862: 2861:its talk page 2854: 2850: 2846: 2842: 2838: 2831: 2828: 2826: 2823: 2822: 2819: 2815: 2811: 2807: 2803: 2802:its talk page 2795: 2791: 2787: 2783: 2779: 2772: 2769: 2767: 2766: 2763: 2758: 2754: 2748: 2745: 2742: 2737: 2732: 2727: 2724: 2720: 2719: 2718: 2716: 2712: 2710:In your edit 2705: 2703: 2702: 2699: 2697: 2695: 2689: 2685: 2677: 2675: 2674: 2671: 2668: 2664: 2660: 2652: 2650: 2649: 2646: 2638: 2632: 2629: 2624: 2623: 2622: 2621: 2618: 2615: 2611: 2607: 2602: 2598: 2594: 2590: 2585: 2581: 2580: 2579: 2578: 2575: 2571: 2567: 2566: 2560: 2559:automated bot 2556: 2551: 2550: 2547: 2539: 2537: 2536: 2533: 2524: 2516: 2513: 2508: 2507: 2506: 2505: 2504: 2503: 2502: 2501: 2498: 2494: 2490: 2482: 2480: 2479: 2476: 2472: 2468: 2467: 2461: 2460:automated bot 2457: 2452: 2451: 2448: 2444: 2441: 2438: 2434: 2430: 2426: 2418: 2414: 2411: 2403: 2398: 2397: 2396: 2395: 2392: 2386: 2382: 2378: 2377: 2374: 2370: 2368: 2364: 2358: 2350: 2346: 2343: 2338: 2337: 2336: 2335: 2332: 2326: 2320: 2317: 2314: 2310: 2306: 2305: 2300: 2299: 2295: 2291: 2290: 2289: 2288: 2285: 2281: 2276: 2268: 2267: 2262: 2261: 2256: 2255: 2251: 2250: 2245: 2244: 2240: 2239: 2238: 2233: 2230: 2226: 2225: 2222: 2219: 2215: 2211: 2210: 2209: 2208: 2205: 2193: 2190: 2186: 2181: 2180: 2179: 2178: 2177: 2176: 2171: 2168: 2163: 2162: 2161: 2160: 2157: 2154: 2150: 2145: 2144: 2140: 2136: 2135: 2131: 2127: 2126: 2125: 2121: 2120: 2117: 2113: 2109: 2107: 2101: 2097: 2093: 2085: 2081: 2078: 2074: 2070: 2069: 2068: 2067: 2064: 2063:Light current 2060: 2052: 2050: 2045: 2042: 2037: 2033: 2032: 2031: 2030: 2027: 2023: 2014: 2012: 2007: 2004: 2002: 1996: 1992: 1991: 1990: 1989: 1986: 1982: 1974: 1971: 1969: 1960: 1959: 1958: 1957: 1954: 1950: 1943: 1939: 1935: 1930: 1929: 1928: 1927: 1924: 1920: 1916: 1909: 1906: 1901: 1900: 1899: 1898: 1894: 1890: 1881: 1871: 1868: 1864: 1863: 1862: 1861: 1860: 1859: 1858: 1857: 1846: 1845: 1844: 1843: 1842: 1841: 1840: 1839: 1828: 1823: 1822: 1821: 1820: 1819: 1818: 1817: 1816: 1805: 1804: 1803: 1802: 1801: 1800: 1799: 1798: 1787: 1786: 1785: 1784: 1783: 1782: 1781: 1780: 1773: 1770: 1766: 1762: 1759: 1755: 1752:foolishness, 1751: 1746: 1742: 1738: 1737: 1736: 1735: 1734: 1733: 1728: 1725: 1721: 1716: 1715: 1714: 1713: 1706: 1703: 1699: 1695: 1691: 1686: 1683: 1679: 1675: 1671: 1667: 1663: 1662: 1661: 1660: 1659: 1658: 1653: 1650: 1645: 1641: 1640: 1639: 1638: 1635: 1632: 1627: 1626: 1625: 1624: 1621: 1617: 1609: 1606: 1601: 1600: 1599: 1598: 1595: 1591: 1583: 1577: 1574: 1569: 1568: 1567: 1566: 1563: 1560: 1555: 1554: 1551: 1548: 1544: 1540: 1535: 1534: 1533: 1532: 1529: 1525: 1521: 1513: 1511: 1510: 1507: 1504: 1501: 1497: 1493: 1489: 1482: 1479: 1477: 1476: 1473: 1469: 1465: 1458: 1455: 1449: 1446: 1443: 1442: 1441: 1440: 1434: 1430: 1429: 1428: 1427: 1424: 1421: 1417: 1416: 1415: 1414: 1411: 1407: 1403: 1401: 1397: 1389: 1387: 1386: 1383: 1378: 1374: 1370: 1366: 1362: 1357: 1353: 1349: 1345: 1341: 1337: 1331: 1329: 1321: 1318: 1314: 1313: 1309: 1308: 1304: 1300: 1296: 1295: 1290: 1286: 1282: 1278: 1274: 1273: 1269: 1268: 1263: 1262: 1258: 1256: 1255: 1252: 1240: 1237: 1236:Light current 1233: 1232: 1231: 1228: 1224: 1223: 1222: 1221: 1218: 1215: 1210: 1209: 1208: 1207: 1204: 1200: 1196: 1192: 1184: 1182: 1181: 1178: 1177:Light current 1169: 1166: 1161: 1160: 1159: 1158: 1157: 1156: 1153: 1152:Light current 1149: 1140: 1136: 1132: 1131: 1130: 1129: 1126: 1125:Light current 1117: 1115: 1114: 1111: 1105: 1104: 1101: 1093: 1089: 1085: 1081: 1080: 1077: 1073: 1069: 1068: 1067: 1056: 1052: 1048: 1047: 1046: 1045: 1044: 1043: 1038: 1035: 1031: 1030: 1029: 1028: 1027: 1026: 1023: 1019: 1012: 1009: 1003: 1000: 999:Light current 996: 992: 991: 990: 989: 988: 987: 984: 978: 977: 974: 973:Light current 964: 960: 959: 958: 957: 949: 945: 942: 938: 937: 936: 935: 934: 933: 928:series boxes: 927: 923: 922: 921: 920: 915: 912: 911:Light current 907: 906: 905: 904: 898: 894: 889: 888: 887: 886: 879: 876: 871: 867: 863: 859: 858: 857: 856: 855: 854: 849: 846: 845:Light current 841: 840: 839: 838: 833: 830: 829:Light current 826: 821: 820: 819: 818: 811: 807: 801: 800: 799: 798: 797: 796: 791: 788: 787:Light current 784: 783: 782: 781: 778: 774: 769: 765: 761: 760: 756: 752: 751: 750: 749: 741: 737: 733: 728: 727: 726: 725: 721: 713:syntax change 709: 703: 699: 696: 695:Light current 692: 691: 686: 682: 677: 674:Great way to 673: 672: 671: 670: 667: 664: 663:Light current 660: 659: 655: 651: 647: 646: 645: 644: 641: 637: 634: 631: 625: 623: 619: 615: 609: 607: 604: 603: 600: 594: 590: 589:ophthalmology 586: 582: 574: 572: 571: 568: 565: 556: 554: 553: 550: 547: 543: 536: 532: 530: 529: 526: 516: 513: 509: 505: 501: 497: 496: 495: 492: 487: 486: 485: 484: 481: 477: 470: 466: 460: 457: 453: 449: 445: 441: 440: 439: 438: 435: 432: 428: 427: 423: 419: 415: 412: 408: 405: 401: 400: 395: 394: 390: 389: 388: 387: 384: 379: 366: 365: 364: 363: 362: 361: 355: 351: 350: 349: 348: 342: 339:redirects to 338: 334: 333: 332: 331: 325: 321: 317: 316: 315: 314: 308: 305: 304: 303: 302: 292: 289: 288: 284: 283: 282: 281: 278: 275: 270: 269: 268: 267: 264: 260: 256: 252: 244: 242: 241: 238: 234: 230: 226: 218: 214: 211: 207: 203: 199: 195: 191: 190: 189: 188: 185: 181: 177: 169: 167: 166: 163: 154: 150: 147: 143: 140: 136: 132: 128: 127: 123: 118: 117: 116: 110: 107: 102: 99: 98: 97: 96: 93: 87: 81: 79: 78: 75: 71: 67: 63: 56: 53: 51: 48: 46: 43: 41: 38: 36: 33: 31: 28: 27: 26: 24: 16: 4637: 4626: 4624: 4600:for deletion 4580: 4573: 4562:{{db-draft}} 4542: 4527: 4498: 4491: 4487:Userfication 4484: 4481: 4470: 4432: 4426: 4403: 4397: 4391: 4305: 4297:possibility. 4293: 4270:. Thanks to 4204: 4176: 4170: 4147: 4139: 4137: 4103: 4097: 4074: 4066: 4064: 4046: 4042: 4024:— Preceding 4021: 4018: 4010: 4007: 4002: 3998: 3995: 3961:, but other 3950: 3942:edit summary 3933: 3926: 3913: 3901:The article 3900: 3865: 3859: 3836: 3828: 3826: 3790: 3784: 3744: 3742: 3728: 3704: 3702: 3695: 3691: 3687: 3683: 3657: 3648: 3641: 3603: 3551: 3528: 3494: 3478: 3473: 3467: 3461: 3458: 3447: 3418: 3413: 3407: 3401: 3398: 3387: 3330:— Preceding 3326: 3319: 3316: 3277: 3274: 3257: 3240:Friskanellin 3217:Friskanellin 3214: 3210: 3203: 3200: 3188: 3185: 3146: 3112:exist. The 3108:, but other 3097: 3089:edit summary 3080: 3073: 3065: 3053:The article 3052: 3020: 3008: 3002: 2994: 2987: 2981: 2975: 2969: 2959: 2934: 2914: 2903: 2889: 2834: 2824: 2775: 2760:Thank you,-- 2759: 2755: 2752: 2749:Noise Figure 2730: 2709: 2693: 2681: 2672: 2662: 2656: 2642: 2569: 2563: 2558: 2552: 2543: 2528: 2486: 2470: 2464: 2459: 2453: 2432: 2428: 2424: 2422: 2387: 2383: 2379: 2367:someone else 2366: 2362: 2360: 2355:Quoted from 2354: 2327: 2323: 2312: 2293: 2277: 2273: 2236: 2200: 2122: 2112:welcome page 2105: 2089: 2086:Lindos links 2075:" (#22). -- 2056: 2048: 2018: 2010: 1994: 1977: 1946: 1912: 1885: 1684:, etc., etc. 1665: 1612: 1587: 1517: 1485: 1461: 1432: 1408: 1404: 1393: 1332: 1324: 1298: 1281:World War II 1247: 1190: 1188: 1174: 1145: 1121: 1106: 1097: 1065: 1015: 979: 970: 962: 925: 763: 754: 746: 745: 716: 638: 635: 632: 629: 620: 616: 613: 605: 578: 560: 539: 535:Bates method 521: 473: 375: 248: 222: 173: 158: 113: 88: 85: 59: 20: 4434:voting page 4302:WP:NOTTRUTH 4178:voting page 4105:voting page 4019:Sincerely, 3684:information 3660:Repanco Ltd 3628:Repanco Ltd 3591:Repanco Ltd 3505:Deprivation 2985:free images 2782:Colouration 2771:Colouration 2715:Mary Barnes 2667:Martial Law 2363:or maintain 2292:Firstly... 2229:Hooperbloob 2096:advertising 2026:Hooperbloob 1470:. Thanks. – 1373:linguistics 1352:Electronics 1340:Electronics 1328:Electronics 1227:Wtshymanski 1193:ideas. See 1148:Electronics 1092:Electronics 1088:Video noise 1084:Audio noise 941:main series 742:Some advice 650:User:Cedars 162:Fastfission 4568:{{db-g13}} 4556:{{db-afc}} 4501:HasteurBot 4473:HasteurBot 4418:topic bans 4358:Lindosland 4235:draftspace 4162:topic bans 4089:topic bans 4030:83.8.91.84 3851:topic bans 3608:. Thanks, 3533:. Thanks, 3501:Imprinting 3357:Lindosland 3336:Mstevens83 3299:Lindosland 3279:Sfan00 IMG 2892:Lindosland 2762:Ugur Olgun 2723:Lindosland 2574:Tawkerbot2 2565:Click here 2532:Visorstuff 2497:Lindosland 2475:Tawkerbot2 2466:Click here 2425:References 2391:Lindosland 2331:Lindosland 2284:Lindosland 2204:Lindosland 2167:Lindosland 2059:branchlist 2041:Lindosland 1985:Lindosland 1953:Lindosland 1923:Lindosland 1905:Lindosland 1867:Lindosland 1750:audiophile 1724:Lindosland 1649:Lindosland 1620:Lindosland 1594:Lindosland 1573:Lindosland 1543:Phonograph 1420:Lindosland 1382:Lindosland 1317:The Photon 1251:Lindosland 1214:Lindosland 1203:The Photon 1165:Lindosland 1110:Lindosland 1034:Lindosland 983:Lindosland 948:sub series 875:Lindosland 525:Lindosland 491:Lindosland 467:Reverting 456:Lindosland 383:Lindosland 297:namespace) 274:Lindosland 210:Lindosland 139:plenty big 92:Lindosland 74:Bushytails 62:Wikipedian 40:Help pages 4635:finished. 4576:this link 4545:mainspace 4414:site bans 4314:pseudonym 4272:SmokeyJoe 4247:pseudonym 4158:site bans 4085:site bans 3975:consensus 3905:has been 3847:site bans 3721:help desk 3688:sentences 3672:copyright 3558:Read the 3517:Read the 3122:consensus 3068:WP:SCHOOL 3057:has been 3021:Thanks!-- 2606:vandalism 2589:vandalism 2546:Omegatron 2447:Omegatron 2435:section: 2410:you know? 2406:Just zis 2258:products. 2077:Blainster 1769:Omegatron 1702:Omegatron 1631:Omegatron 1605:Omegatron 1559:Blainster 1547:Blainster 1520:this edit 1488:Root page 1361:Semantics 1135:Electrics 1090:or other 823:a simple 755:objective 626:Root page 575:Root page 404:Root page 320:Root page 307:Root page 295:Knowledge 259:Root page 255:Root page 251:Root page 206:Root page 202:Root page 194:Root page 170:Animation 146:Omegatron 106:Omegatron 64:! Please 4211:reliable 4044:HiAdam, 4026:unsigned 3979:Jellyman 3696:will be 3344:contribs 3332:unsigned 3193:and his 2886:meaning. 2433:See also 2280:Speakers 2264:article. 2147:page on 2000:xaosflux 1967:xaosflux 1830:cables)! 1827:Medicine 1666:your own 1518:Noticed 1377:Meronymy 1369:Holonymy 1365:Meronymy 1195:WP:POINT 909:reply.-- 825:backlink 708:backlink 610:Hub page 564:Dpbsmith 546:Dpbsmith 397:Reasons: 45:Tutorial 4621:deleted 4571:code. 4467:concern 4441:NoACEMM 4294:believe 3801:Gravity 3791:Xxx xxx 3787:Xxx xxx 3758:Diannaa 3678:. (See 3610:DPL bot 3535:DPL bot 3480:ЛееСуда 3474:Тимофей 3420:ЛееСуда 3414:Тимофей 3317:Hello, 3023:DASHBot 2991:WP refs 2979:scholar 2741:Shirt58 2610:comment 2593:comment 2106:content 1807:myself! 1481:WP:SELF 1199:be bold 963:sub sub 843:think-- 504:selfref 23:welcome 17:Welcome 4639:Boleyn 4583:JMHamo 4239:Draft: 4229:is of 3944:or on 3920:WP:ORG 3916:WP:GNG 3597:Aerial 3582:Sobell 3468:speedy 3408:speedy 3131:話して下さい 3091:or on 2963:Google 2921:. The 2851:" and 2792:" and 2694:Daduzi 2628:Tawker 2540:Thanks 2512:Tawker 2402:WP:NOR 1934:ed g2s 1889:ed g2s 1445:Atlant 1410:Atlant 1356:Robots 1100:Anlace 1022:Anlace 640:Cedars 567:(talk) 549:(talk) 500:WP:ASR 476:WP:ASR 337:Revert 141:. :-) 4565:, or 4534:Draft 4281:WP:RS 3756:. — 3006:JSTOR 2967:books 2735:See: 2614:Benon 2597:Benon 2429:after 2247:page. 2128:from 2024:? -- 1496:usage 1464:Noise 1299:Japan 1289:Laser 1285:Laser 1201:. -- 1139:Noise 1051:Noise 961:Each 512:wangi 480:wangi 469:Noise 237:wangi 198:Noise 180:Janke 122:Noise 4643:talk 4587:talk 4540:". 4505:talk 4451:talk 4404:The 4362:talk 4285:HLHJ 4187:talk 4148:The 4114:talk 4075:The 4034:talk 3983:talk 3918:and 3876:talk 3837:The 3762:talk 3729:etc. 3705:must 3614:talk 3580:and 3578:Bush 3539:talk 3503:and 3361:talk 3340:talk 3303:talk 3283:talk 3244:talk 3234:and 3221:talk 3173:talk 3169:PamD 3152:stub 3027:talk 2999:FENS 2973:news 2837:prod 2778:prod 2753:Hi, 2645:TimL 2568:for 2469:for 2431:the 1938:talk 1893:talk 1722:. -- 1541:and 1472:Joke 1191:test 1137:and 1058:side 678:. — 652:and 598:T@lk 540:See 508:talk 506:}} ( 231:and 184:Talk 3747:by 3560:FAQ 3519:FAQ 3484:. 3424:. 3039:of 3013:TWL 2936:685 2911:bot 2684:BBC 2408:Guy 1690:THD 1500:MDD 1433:lot 593:JFW 585:eye 322:to 133:vs 4645:) 4623:. 4589:) 4559:, 4507:) 4496:. 4453:) 4443:}} 4439:{{ 4416:, 4364:) 4217:. 4213:, 4189:) 4181:. 4160:, 4116:) 4108:. 4087:, 4036:) 3985:) 3948:. 3931:. 3878:) 3870:. 3849:, 3764:) 3701:. 3616:) 3541:) 3511:| 3363:) 3346:) 3342:• 3305:) 3285:) 3246:) 3223:) 3175:) 3165:}} 3159:{{ 3155:}} 3149:{{ 3134:) 3095:. 3078:. 3029:) 2993:) 2956:- 2947:}} 2941:{{ 2890:-- 2673::) 2445:— 2404:. 2359:: 2311:. 2039:-- 1936:• 1891:• 1756:, 1680:, 1676:, 1672:, 1522:. 1506:96 1503:46 1380:-- 1367:, 1163:-- 1086:, 971:-- 873:-- 711:}} 705:{{ 595:| 587:, 489:-- 381:-- 182:| 4641:( 4585:( 4503:( 4449:( 4360:( 4223:) 4221:? 4219:( 4185:( 4112:( 4032:( 3981:( 3874:( 3760:( 3739:. 3723:. 3646:. 3612:( 3566:. 3537:( 3525:. 3507:( 3359:( 3338:( 3301:( 3281:( 3242:( 3219:( 3171:( 3128:( 3025:( 3009:· 3003:· 2995:· 2988:· 2982:· 2976:· 2970:· 2965:( 2915:1 2530:- 926:2 356:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index