Knowledge

User talk:ZoeL

Source 📝

336:. In your nomination, post those three news sources. As for notifying people, Knowledge assumes that editors interested in an article will have it on their watchlists. The article creator is supposed to be notified of a deletion nomination, but no one is required to attempt to notify everyone that might be interested in an article. It is assumed that they'd be notified when the deletion nomination is made, which will appear as an edit to the article on the interested users' watchlists. 194: 312:
God, why can't these people write in plain English? Even after reading the so-called explanation of code CSD A7, I'm none the wiser. I have to say I don't think I've ever looked at the Knowledge page on SABRE, but if it explained briefly what SABRE is, who has the right to take it upon themselves to
146:
FYI, because this is a bio of a living person, in order to not inadvertently violate wikipedia's standards it has been decided to thrash out some of the wording of the article on the talk page first. Additionally I have put in a short request for any expert assistance there might be out there on to
307:
A single sentence for "not notable", without informing anyone, not least whoever created the page or anyone actually involved in the site, is not particularly diplomatic. I personally have had nothing to do with any of these pages, but I think it is worth mentioning that this approach (and I am not
349:
the group, it's possible that SABRE meets the criteria for inclusion. Something to remember though is that if the article is nominated at DRV, it's a discussion, not a vote. Attempts to amass numbers in favor of undeleting the article are not a good idea. The result will be determined by arguments
215:
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you.
278:
I don't know who attempted to create a page on Knowledge for this, however in response for your claim that the society is "not notable", I would like to draw your attention to the following articles in the media :
394:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 299:
I believe there have been numerous other appearances in print and on radio, but these were the most obvious to find in a couple of minutes. Furthermore, you may note that a google search for "SABRE" returns
313:
decide it's insignificant? I think there's something I'm not getting about Knowledge's deletion policy, which isn't helped by the impenetrable gobbledegook its administrators hide behind.
304:
as the first hit on the page, and also if you google for "site:en.wikipedia.org sabre-roads", you will find numerous pages on British roads that link to SABRE as a verifiable source.
116:
Thanks ZoeL, the fact is that the article is a mess. I have been meaning to have a go at it myself but haven't got round to it. The way to do it would be to go to each of the
272: 253:. The split has now been done, though fairly crudely as I am not an expert on the subject. It will need an expert eye to look at it and smooth out the edges. 308:
particularly singling you out) unfortunately has alienated people and stopped them contributing to Knowledge. A sample comment from our membership follows :
148: 419: 341:
Now, given the situation at the time, the decision to delete the article was probably sound. With addition press mentions that are
212: 415: 117: 62: 288: 57: 406:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
411: 40: 67: 238: 231: 250: 246: 156: 242: 121: 102: 47: 36: 178: 129: 74: 358: 322: 202: 78: 407: 198: 90: 82: 263: 152: 52: 43:. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: 332:
Ritchie, if you disagree with the outcome of the AfD, you can always nominate the article for a
89:(~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out 383: 374: 283: 221: 98: 403: 387: 174: 125: 402:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 353: 318: 399: 391: 395: 333: 256: 217: 140: 17: 209:( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button 124:. Easy enough to do, but reformatting would take some time! Best wishes, 93:, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place 193: 350:
for or against something, not bodies standing on one side of the room.
211: 293: 206: 86: 390:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge
237:
After several years of discussion the consensus was to split the
423: 367: 326: 301: 266: 225: 182: 160: 133: 106: 97:
before the question. Again, welcome! (for half a year ago!)
171: 201:
and Knowledge pages that have open discussion, you should
139:
article on UK lesbian columnist and anti-trans campaigner
197:
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
317:I would be interested in your comments to this. -- 273:Society for All British and Irish Road Enthusiasts 382:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current 151:. Please do take a look and add your thoughts. 8: 73:I hope you enjoy editing here and being a 170:I would like to invite your comments at 7: 25: 408:review the candidates' statements 210: 192: 120:pages and grab a list of their 414:. For the Election committee, 384:Arbitration Committee election 375:ArbCom elections are now open! 241:article into three articles - 118:NHS Strategic Health Authority 1: 424:13:01, 23 November 2015 (UTC) 327:12:50, 28 February 2011 (UTC) 302:http://www.sabre-roads.org.uk 267:15:23, 17 February 2011 (UTC) 183:14:14, 26 December 2008 (UTC) 161:05:03, 23 November 2008 (UTC) 134:20:15, 18 November 2008 (UTC) 48:The five pillars of Knowledge 63:How to write a great article 39:to Knowledge! Thank you for 410:and submit your choices on 439: 416:MediaWiki message delivery 107:10:57, 17 April 2008 (UTC) 368:20:06, 3 March 2011 (UTC) 226:14:56, 6 April 2010 (UTC) 239:Reading to Plymouth Line 232:Reading to Plymouth Line 345:the group and not just 251:Exeter to Plymouth line 247:Reading to Taunton line 122:NHS Primary Care Trusts 243:Bristol to Exeter line 388:Arbitration Committee 392:arbitration process 112:Primary Care Trusts 91:Knowledge:Questions 404:arbitration policy 294:The One Show - BBC 58:How to edit a page 41:your contributions 18:User talk:LindsayL 188:Your recent edits 149:LGBT studies page 81:your messages on 35:Hello, ZoeL, and 16:(Redirected from 430: 366: 363: 356: 314: 265: 259: 214: 196: 96: 83:discussion pages 21: 438: 437: 433: 432: 431: 429: 428: 427: 412:the voting page 378: 362: 359: 354: 351: 334:deletion review 311: 289:Daily Telegraph 276: 257: 254: 235: 205:by typing four 203:sign your posts 190: 168: 144: 114: 94: 68:Manual of Style 27:A very late... 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 436: 434: 381: 377: 372: 371: 370: 360: 338: 337: 297: 296: 291: 286: 275: 270: 234: 229: 189: 186: 167: 164: 143: 137: 113: 110: 71: 70: 65: 60: 55: 50: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 435: 426: 425: 421: 417: 413: 409: 405: 401: 397: 393: 389: 385: 376: 373: 369: 365: 364: 357: 348: 344: 340: 339: 335: 331: 330: 329: 328: 324: 320: 315: 309: 305: 303: 295: 292: 290: 287: 285: 282: 281: 280: 274: 271: 269: 268: 264: 261: 260: 252: 248: 244: 240: 233: 230: 228: 227: 223: 219: 213: 208: 204: 200: 195: 187: 185: 184: 180: 176: 173: 165: 163: 162: 158: 154: 153:CyntWorkStuff 150: 142: 138: 136: 135: 131: 127: 123: 119: 111: 109: 108: 104: 100: 92: 88: 84: 80: 76: 69: 66: 64: 61: 59: 56: 54: 51: 49: 46: 45: 44: 42: 38: 33: 32: 28: 19: 379: 352: 346: 342: 316: 310: 306: 298: 277: 255: 236: 191: 169: 145: 141:Julie Bindel 115: 99:Simply south 72: 34: 30: 29: 26: 355:Imzadi 1979 284:Independent 175:Jezhotwells 172:Talk:SimSig 126:Millstream3 85:using four 400:topic bans 347:mentioning 319:Ritchie333 199:talk pages 95:{{helpme}} 75:Wikipedian 396:site bans 77:! Please 258:SilkTork 53:Tutorial 31:Welcome! 218:SineBot 37:welcome 386:. The 249:, and 207:tildes 166:SimSig 87:tildes 343:about 420:talk 323:talk 222:talk 179:talk 157:talk 147:the 130:talk 103:talk 79:sign 380:Hi, 422:) 398:, 325:) 245:, 224:) 216:-- 181:) 159:) 132:) 105:) 418:( 361:→ 321:( 262:* 220:( 177:( 155:( 128:( 101:( 20:)

Index

User talk:LindsayL
welcome
your contributions
The five pillars of Knowledge
Tutorial
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Manual of Style
Wikipedian
sign
discussion pages
tildes
Knowledge:Questions
Simply south
talk
10:57, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
NHS Strategic Health Authority
NHS Primary Care Trusts
Millstream3
talk
20:15, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
Julie Bindel
LGBT studies page
CyntWorkStuff
talk
05:03, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
Talk:SimSig
Jezhotwells
talk
14:14, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.