505:. They wrote that the citizen is the supreme authority to protect the new nation against such abuses in every generation. The Second Amendment embodies this by backing that ultimate citizen authority with lethal force, in fact citizen supervision and control of all force in America. Longenecker emphasizes that crime is often used as an excuse to disarm that ultimate authority - the people - for the unhampered growth of cottage industries, cronyism, boondoggles, crises, and bureaucracies based on anti-crime policy. Finally, Longenecker shows how claims of no improvements in right-to-carry states crime stats are untrue, and shows how, rather, that no state has been made to regret its support of the armed citizen.
31:
231:
this stop?" In her last bulk revert (rollback?) with the edit summary "added banner," she not only added a banner to
Spitzer's article, she rolled back good-faith edits by me and by Prof. Spitzer. That man has been much more patient with this ordeal than we have any right to expect. Of course, I don't like being treated like this, but I just cannot keep quiet and watch her treat the prof. that way.
257:
900:
knows them, nor any offline communication about the cases or about those articles whatsoever. I am not currently connected with any gun rights or gun control organization, and have never been a member of the NRA. My only intent has been to edit the article you mention in a neutral manner to provide readers with relevant information.
752:
personal attack. It matters on the intentions on the person using it and not on the specific definition itself. Is it a fact that he's a SPA, it could be. Does that mean consistently pointing it out is acceptable? No. Especially if it's used as an ad hominem (argument about a person's traits, instead of their central point)."
581:
BTW: I "restored" what you re-wrote and re-sourced. Thanks. I'm not suggesting we move it, but what section or under what "argument" do you think that paragraph belongs? (I think "argument" came about as a compromise with one of the other editors. After Sue reverted it, I changed it to "debate," but
917:
Hi. I wrote: "I did do an 'email this user' twice but got no answer, and my message basically said 'hello'." The words "email this user" are over on the left-hand-side of your screen under "Tools". I did not use this tool to contact you, but rather used it to contact two other editors. They did
496:
continues to align with the interests of the nation across all time. Longenecker sees the
Founding Fathers' defeat of the abuse of due process in their overthrowing of British rule as a crucial aspect of lasting personal independence, without which the nation will perish for unwelcome dependency on
483:
don't have clearly defined boundaries and are controversial. While working on them just add content. Just report the arguments pro and con. Don't reargue the questions. Readers can go to the references if they want to see that. Ideally a reader should not be able to tell if a section was written by
899:
You recently mentioned my name to ArbCom, but I'm not sure I understand whether you're objecting to my behavior or not. Perhaps you could clarify? For the record, I have not received any message or other communication offline from any editor involved in the gun control cases, or from anyone who
230:
I know you're not available during the day now, so no rush, but when you do get a chance, I would like your advice on how to have Sue's rollback rights taken away. I believe she has them and I believe she is abusing them. Most recent evidence is discussed at
Spitzer's talk page under "How to make
751:
TParis wrote: "Calling someone a WP:SPA is a personal attack when the title is used as a pejorative. Calling me a 'guy' could be a personal attack in the right context. ie. If I were editing an article on feminist issues and someone say "Well, of course he'd say that, he's a guy". That'd be a
471:
Ask very specific questions about the edits. If you have agreement on the talk page to back up edits, cite it. I agree with Sue by the way that you don't need to use "arguments" in all those subheadings. It's implied that they are arguments.
497:
government. Longenecker adds that the
Founders did not write the Constitution for citizens, but entirely for officials in expressing limits on government at all levels. Regarding the Second Amendment, the Founders did not fear nor imagine
768:
I'm not the first to point out your exclusive editing habits and I doubt that I will be the last. There is no point in discussing this with you. Anyone who takes even the most cursory look at your edit history can see what is up. Be well.
381:
Sue is not edit warring. She is not hounding you. Don't make administrative complaints about this kind of difference of opinion. Instead ask for an explanation. You made a change. Sue changed it back. Now start a discussion.
564:
page. I am sick to my stomach just pondering how to make any progress on having good, NPOV, gun-control related pages on
Knowledge (XXG) when editors on these pages behave the way most of the ones I've encountered behave.
215:
I looked over Robert
Spitzer's page and made a comment on the talk page. Sue isn't hounding you in the Knowledge (XXG) sense, but I am concerned. I'm not available in the daytime these days. I'll get back to you later.
484:
someone who was for gun control or against it. Make sure that you can summarize ideas that you disagree with as clearly as those you agree with. Don't try to organize such articles. That steps on too many toes.
602:
Please do not remove the SPA tag again. You edit one subject exclusively. If you don't like the tag, feel free to report the problem to ANI, or better yet, edit something unconnected to Gun
Control. be well.
487:
Don't remove material without a reference just because the citation needed template has been around for a while and you don't agree with the material. First find out if a reference exists. You removed:
509:
From the content it is obvious that he has either written this or spoken about this somewhere. It turned out to be very easy to find his book and even the pages that some of this material comes from:
740:
792:
I'm well aware of your opinion of me. All I'm asking is for you not to broadcast it. Let others speak for themselves. Also, please remember the warning TParis gave you on 27 JAN 2014 on the
991:
Thanks. I will check 'em out. (I think I made that edit from my phone, which is less flexible for cutting and pasting. That MIGHT be why I did it that way. Or just because I'm still kinda
833:, but the writing admittedly could use much improvement in wording and fluidity. I hope you'd be willing to help, and would really appreciate if you could take some time for glance at it.
793:
623:
918:
not respond. What I'm trying to say is that I haven't been coordinating with any other editors about any
Knowledge (XXG)-wide pro-gun push offline (or online for that matter).
181:
Oh, thank you so much. I hope you had a wonderful
Christmas/holiday. Let me know if there is any work I can do to help you to assess the situation. Diffs, history, anything...
537:
626:
here. Above, you say of me, "You edit one subject exclusively." Here are some articles I have contributed to in addition to gun and gun-control related articles:
857:
I'd be happy to help. At first glance, it LOOKS lovely. I will start at the top and give feedback as I go. WHERE would you like me to post that (feedback)?
386:
645:
561:
521:
717:
353:
557:
Thanks, Starry. I have been sick this past week, and I'm going to bed soon, but I will read and re-read what you've written here tomorrow.
707:
822:
97:
476:
378:
338:
89:
84:
72:
67:
59:
146:
You're welcome. Are you a person? (Maybe a bot? I'm not familiar with many of those.) I do plan to add more material this week.
138:
871:
Either here or a section of my talk page would be fine, I'd be equally responsive to either. Thanks for agreeing to help.--
492:
Frequent talk show guest, Examiner.com Gun Rights columnist and author John
Longenecker argues that the nation's founders'
778:
612:
285:
630:
560:
In the meantime, can you tell me what it IS that Sue is doing? Please, please go and look at what she just did on the
830:
360:
272:
38:
923:
905:
702:
650:
1000:
862:
801:
758:
712:
665:
587:
570:
547:
236:
221:
200:
186:
171:
151:
47:
17:
982:
680:
166:
Hi. I'm reading over the last series of edits and other editors responses and will get back to you today.
775:
675:
609:
356:
130:
264:
256:
195:
Still reading. I don't have any words of wisdom. I am pleased to see you are remaining calm over this.
919:
901:
826:
125:
If you could add one or more reliable third party references to this article, that would be great.
996:
858:
797:
754:
744:
583:
566:
543:
531:
232:
217:
196:
182:
167:
147:
582:
I think that got changed, too. Honestly... I don't know what's going on over there right now.)
979:
723:
518:
512:
281:
111:
941:
771:
660:
635:
605:
118:
948:
on how to change the external Wikilink to an internal Wikilink. Consider, also, using the
881:
846:
1004:
985:
927:
909:
886:
866:
851:
805:
783:
762:
691:
617:
591:
574:
551:
493:
364:
323:
290:
240:
225:
204:
190:
175:
155:
972:
962:
670:
821:
I would like to ask you for some copy-editing help. I saw that you added your name to
952:
729:
686:
313:
276:
736:
655:
480:
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
872:
837:
640:
747:, for that not happening. I am telling you now to stop labeling me an SPA.
337:
429:
5.2.1.4 Counterarguments to the effectiveness of gun laws on gun violence
743:
That notice nearly boomeranged on you, but you can thank my my mentor,
514:
Transfer of Wealth: The Case for Nationwide Concealed Carry of Handguns
467:
5.6.4 Counterarguments to the effectiveness of gun laws on gun violence
263:
Hello, Lightbreather/Archive 5. Your question has been answered at the
389:
Sue just changed section headings back. Ask her to explain why this:
426:
5.2.1.3 Relationship between criminal violence and gun ownership
825:
and have professional experience with copy-editing. My draft,
696:
464:
5.6.3 Relationship between criminal violence and gun ownership
25:
297:
at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).
255:
829:, is a thorough history and background on my hometown of
106:
A page you started (Robert J. Cottrol) has been reviewed!
978:
templates when appropriate; even though I rarely do. ā
945:
542:. So please put the material back, with the reference.
294:
121:
just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
794:
Article for deletion/Global gun cultures talk page:
446:
5.3 Security against tyranny and invasion arguments
423:
5.2.1.2 Logical pitfalls in the gun-violence debate
796:"Quit it, Sue, I will block you if you continue."
461:5.6.2 Logical pitfalls in the gun-violence debate
503:abuses of due process in all eras of the future
275:after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by
8:
536:: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (
129:To reply, leave a comment on Versace1608's
739:'s comments about calling people an SPA in
405:5.1.3 Security against tyranny and invasion
251:Re: How to tag objectionable image files
271:Please note that all old questions are
823:Knowledge (XXG):Peer review/volunteers
529:
335:
44:Do not edit the contents of this page.
940:Thank you for tracing the archive at
646:Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band
7:
718:Robert Spitzer (political scientist)
373:About editing controversial subjects
354:Robert Spitzer (political scientist)
708:National Conference of Black Mayors
24:
562:Gun politics in the United States
477:Gun politics in the United States
452:5.5 State constitutions arguments
379:Gun politics in the United States
162:About the problems you are having
336:
29:
511:Longenecker, John, Jr. (2005).
443:5.2 Second Amendment arguments
440:5.1 Fundamental right argument
1:
402:5.1.2 Second Amendment rights
1005:19:46, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
986:19:43, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
928:23:22, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
910:16:08, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
887:15:43, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
867:15:18, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
852:02:08, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
806:21:11, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
784:06:43, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
763:03:05, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
618:02:12, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
592:05:47, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
575:05:16, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
552:05:04, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
365:19:08, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
324:15:15, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
291:22:27, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
241:21:15, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
226:14:19, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
205:07:01, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
191:17:04, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
176:15:50, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
156:00:55, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
414:5.2 Public policy arguments
267:. Feel free to reply there!
1021:
831:Briarcliff Manor, New York
814:Briarcliff Manor, New York
631:A Hard Day's Night (album)
455:5.6 Gun violence arguments
449:5.4 Self-defense arguments
396:5.1 Rights-based arguments
352:For your tireless work on
735:Please re-read the admin
699:(peer review and editing)
411:5.1.5 State constitutions
342:
703:Jack Brooks (politician)
651:Revolver (Beatles album)
517:. AuthorHouse. pp.Ā 8ā9.
713:The Beverly Hillbillies
666:The Beatles discography
501:, but saw more clearly
399:5.1.1 Fundamental right
309:It was a pleasure.Ā :-)
117:Knowledge (XXG) editor
18:User talk:Lightbreather
681:Talk:Ex parte Crow Dog
420:5.2.1.1 Firearm deaths
265:Teahouse Q&A board
260:
127:
995:, as WP editors go.)
676:Modern sporting rifle
499:weapons of the future
437:5 Political arguments
433:Is better than this:
393:5 Political arguments
259:
123:
42:of past discussions.
741:this ANI discussion.
458:5.6.1 Firearm deaths
110:Thanks for creating
624:tagged me as an SPA
417:5.2.1 Gun violence
408:5.1.4 Self-defense
295:remove this notice
261:
114:, Lightbreather!
944:, but please see
818:Hi Lightbreaker,
724:Robert J. Cottrol
523:978-1-4634-5421-0
370:
369:
142:
137:Learn more about
112:Robert J. Cottrol
103:
102:
54:
53:
48:current talk page
1012:
977:
971:
967:
961:
957:
951:
942:Talk:Gun control
884:
879:
878:
849:
844:
843:
782:
781:
661:Please Please Me
636:With the Beatles
616:
615:
541:
535:
527:
385:For example, in
357:I am One of Many
346:The BLP Barnstar
340:
333:
332:
320:
317:
298:
289:
136:
81:
56:
55:
33:
32:
26:
1020:
1019:
1015:
1014:
1013:
1011:
1010:
1009:
975:
969:
965:
959:
955:
949:
938:
920:Anythingyouwant
902:Anythingyouwant
897:
882:
874:
873:
847:
839:
838:
827:User:ā±®/sandbox7
816:
774:
770:
753:
692:Online identity
608:
604:
600:
528:
524:
510:
494:Original Intent
375:
331:
318:
315:
307:
299:
279:
270:
253:
164:
108:
77:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1018:
1016:
1008:
1007:
937:
934:
933:
932:
931:
930:
896:
893:
892:
891:
890:
889:
815:
812:
811:
810:
809:
808:
787:
786:
750:
733:
732:
727:
721:
715:
710:
705:
700:
694:
689:
684:
678:
673:
671:Harry Mitchell
668:
663:
658:
653:
648:
643:
638:
633:
599:
596:
595:
594:
578:
577:
558:
522:
507:
506:
475:Articles like
469:
468:
465:
462:
459:
456:
453:
450:
447:
444:
441:
438:
431:
430:
427:
424:
421:
418:
415:
412:
409:
406:
403:
400:
397:
394:
374:
371:
368:
367:
349:
348:
343:
341:
330:
329:Robert Spitzer
327:
312:Kind regards.
306:
303:
301:
269:
254:
252:
249:
248:
247:
246:
245:
244:
243:
210:
209:
208:
207:
163:
160:
159:
158:
107:
104:
101:
100:
95:
92:
87:
82:
75:
70:
65:
62:
52:
51:
34:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1017:
1006:
1002:
998:
997:Lightbreather
994:
990:
989:
988:
987:
984:
981:
974:
964:
954:
947:
943:
935:
929:
925:
921:
916:
915:
914:
913:
912:
911:
907:
903:
894:
888:
885:
880:
877:
870:
869:
868:
864:
860:
859:Lightbreather
856:
855:
854:
853:
850:
845:
842:
834:
832:
828:
824:
819:
813:
807:
803:
799:
798:Lightbreather
795:
791:
790:
789:
788:
785:
780:
777:
773:
767:
766:
765:
764:
760:
756:
755:Lightbreather
748:
746:
745:StarryGrandma
742:
738:
731:
730:Kevin Johnson
728:
725:
722:
719:
716:
714:
711:
709:
706:
704:
701:
698:
695:
693:
690:
688:
685:
683:(peer review)
682:
679:
677:
674:
672:
669:
667:
664:
662:
659:
657:
654:
652:
649:
647:
644:
642:
639:
637:
634:
632:
629:
628:
627:
625:
620:
619:
614:
611:
607:
597:
593:
589:
585:
584:Lightbreather
580:
579:
576:
572:
568:
567:Lightbreather
563:
559:
556:
555:
554:
553:
549:
545:
544:StarryGrandma
539:
533:
525:
520:
516:
515:
504:
500:
495:
491:
490:
489:
485:
482:
478:
473:
466:
463:
460:
457:
454:
451:
448:
445:
442:
439:
436:
435:
434:
428:
425:
422:
419:
416:
413:
410:
407:
404:
401:
398:
395:
392:
391:
390:
388:
383:
380:
372:
366:
362:
358:
355:
351:
350:
347:
344:
339:
334:
328:
326:
325:
322:
321:
310:
305:Re: Thank you
304:
302:
296:
292:
287:
283:
278:
274:
268:
266:
258:
250:
242:
238:
234:
233:Lightbreather
229:
228:
227:
223:
219:
218:StarryGrandma
214:
213:
212:
211:
206:
202:
198:
197:StarryGrandma
194:
193:
192:
188:
184:
183:Lightbreather
180:
179:
178:
177:
173:
169:
168:StarryGrandma
161:
157:
153:
149:
148:Lightbreather
145:
144:
143:
140:
139:page curation
134:
132:
126:
122:
120:
115:
113:
105:
99:
96:
93:
91:
88:
86:
83:
80:
76:
74:
71:
69:
66:
63:
61:
58:
57:
49:
45:
41:
40:
35:
28:
27:
19:
992:
980:Arthur Rubin
939:
898:
875:
840:
835:
820:
817:
749:
734:
687:Annie Easley
621:
601:
513:
508:
502:
498:
486:
474:
470:
432:
384:
376:
345:
314:
311:
308:
300:
262:
165:
135:
128:
124:
116:
109:
78:
43:
37:
772:Sue Rangell
656:Rubber Soul
606:Sue Rangell
481:Gun control
293:. (You can
119:Versace1608
36:This is an
641:Abbey Road
98:ArchiveĀ 10
946:this edit
936:Wikilinks
836:Thanks.--
726:(new BLP)
622:You have
532:cite book
387:this edit
131:talk page
90:ArchiveĀ 7
85:ArchiveĀ 6
79:ArchiveĀ 5
73:ArchiveĀ 4
68:ArchiveĀ 3
60:ArchiveĀ 1
286:contribs
273:archived
598:SPA Tag
277:Anon126
39:archive
983:(talk)
968:, and
895:ArbCom
883:(talk)
848:(talk)
737:TParis
319:ngelus
993:green
973:Oldid
963:diff2
720:(BLP)
16:<
1001:talk
953:diff
924:talk
906:talk
863:talk
802:talk
759:talk
588:talk
571:talk
548:talk
538:link
519:ISBN
479:and
361:talk
282:talk
237:talk
222:talk
201:talk
187:talk
172:talk
152:talk
697:KFC
377:on
1003:)
976:}}
970:{{
966:}}
960:{{
958:,
956:}}
950:{{
926:)
908:)
865:)
804:)
776:ā
769:--
761:)
610:ā
603:--
590:)
573:)
550:)
534:}}
530:{{
363:)
284:-
239:)
224:)
203:)
189:)
174:)
154:)
133:.
94:ā
64:ā
999:(
922:(
904:(
876:ɱ
861:(
841:ɱ
800:(
779:ā
757:(
613:ā
586:(
569:(
546:(
540:)
526:.
359:(
316:A
288:)
280:(
235:(
220:(
199:(
185:(
170:(
150:(
141:.
50:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.