1044:
emailing them to you right away. Do you have ADSL or better broadband? If not, and you only have a dial-up connection, I will shrink the photos first. Also, I should add that all of my photos are really just "snapshots" and not carefully taken wildlife photos - the quality of some of them may not be as high as one might wish in a
Knowledge (XXG) article and I would be grateful if you could vet them first. Finally, now that I know you are interested - I will do my best to obtain more frog photos (I didn't have any specific motivation previously) but I may have to wait until the next Wet Season to get any - we are just at the beginning of our Dry Season now.
2065:
potentially offensive. I'm against T2 etc., I guess it was more the potential sensitivities of e.g. the photographer and a matter of manners. As for the decor, I thought the "pleasing to the eye" criterion went something like "Taken or created in a manner which best illustrates the subject of the image. The picture should make a reader want to know more." To be honest, I find the iconography you mentioned (& carpet) tacky but I reckon that's part of the subject, and not the responsibility of the photographer. Again, my apologies if I sounded rude. •
1048:
wide-spread phenomenon but thought you might be interested to know that we are suffering from it here too. We are also getting many less cane toads (thank goodness!) and very few really big ones. Previously people said this was due to the 4 years of drought we experienced - but we had a good Wet this year and still the toad and frog populations are down. Also, some of the toads seem to be suffering from a "wasting" disease - a local expert here claims this is just due to starvation - but I am not convinced.
31:
1559:. She is going to take a photo of it, and send it to me tomorrow before releasing. Would you be able to find your best tadpole and egg photos? Hopefully mum's photos come out well (they usually do), otherwise it will take a couple weeks, and I will go down to her place after the exams, when another is morphing (there are still some to go). We have the amplexus photo for these guys, so that is a plus. The cycle should be: egg --: -->
1323:. I think that the natural history and biogeography chapters in particular contain heaps of relevant information that isn't really covered extensively in your article (the species density map would make a great addition for example). The collection and history of discovery chapters are also pretty interesting and could provide you with heaps of ideas for expansion.--
1092:
1608:
Hey Evan, when I was out frogging last night I got a photo of a
Litoria verreauxii metamorph with the entire tail, I have photos of the spawn from that species but I don't think I have a tadpole shot. Do you want me to upload it or were you going to get a Lim. peronii metamorph so they can all be the
1098:
I do have some photos of frogs, but the only ones we get around my house are Green Tree frogs (after we killed off all the cane toads), which I see are well represented, and none of my photos are better than the ones already here. Sorry I couldn't be more help, but if I see one, I'll definitely take
677:
Sorry if I described it in a confusing way. I'll give it one more try if I may. :) On most file systems, each file has a "last modified" date. You can list files in a directory chronologically by this date using the command "ls -t", or "ls -rt" for most recent last (this is typically what you want).
466:
This paper re-estructures the entire classification of
Amphibians, and most families of Anura are redefined (e.j., Brachycephalidae is now a family that includes the genus Eleutherodactylus and not just Brachycephalus), providing a phylogenetic taxonomy. The changes proposed are widely recognize and
1047:
It is paticularly worrying that we haven't had nearly as many frogs in recent years as in the past - either in total numbers (roughly measured by me on the number of sightings and the volume of sound at night in the Wet Season) or in the variety of species we used to get here. I know this is a very
2116:
Yeah it's been bloody freezing down here lately. I've never been into the brickpit before as SOPA has something against letting us go in there on FATS feild trips. On some warm nights I've been out to
Homebush, there have just been bell frogs all over the place, and once after a FATS meeting (FATS
1887:
Good work - great article and beautiful pics! Glad to see the article on the
Wrinkled Toadlet featured on the front page of the Knowledge (XXG). Keep up the good work. I hope I can get some more photos for you if we are blessed with a decent Wet Season this year. The very noticable decline in frog
164:
Not sure where to put this, but I just wanted to congratulate you on a well administered article (cane toads)! I ALWAYS take a look at the discussion pages on FA and am often disgusted at the amount of infighting that occurs. However, you do a GREAT job of asking for help and taking constructive
2064:
Sorry, I didn't mean to be rude, and you would know far more about wikipedia policy than I. I just thought that the comment about the church during the depression was irrelevant to your judgment of the photo; if its function wasn't related to that then I wonder whether it's worth saying something
1730:
Hi Evan, thanks for the hello. I have been working on
Knowledge (XXG) for a year or so, mainly concentrating on Australian native freshwater fish and things relating to the Fleet Air Arm of the Royal Australian Navy (a former life). I haven't looked much at frog things here, since I am not very
1452:
and you can make your pick, however if you want a photo of the metamorph of that same species as well it might be a bit difficult, as I only have photos of a few species as metamorphs (ones that sill have a decent amount of tail) and after having a breif look through my photos I have found that I
1337:
I noticed that there have been a few new photos coming into wikipedia lately, and you have been creating aticles to go with the photos. Do you what other species are likely to get photos soon, so I might be able to write a few articles as well (I could just write articles on other species, but it
1043:
Hi again - thanks for your suggestions. I am a bit loathe to upload images to the
Commons before they are identified and would prefer, if it is O.K. with you, to email them to you first for identification. Please let me know what you think. If you would be happy to look at them first I will start
685:
will create the files on the target machine as though new, i.e. setting all "last modified" dates to the present, erasing the original last modified dates. This can also happen when transferring files between different file systems, e.g. if you have two partitions on your local hard disk, one of
1633:
website, then I am fairly sure that that frog is not bibronii. When I first saw that photo I though it was P. ravenii, as my neighbour (who is an ecologist) did some survey work up in far northern New South Wales with Arthur White and they discovered some frogs up there that looked lots like P.
1467:
After having a detailed look through my photos, I found I have photos of metamorphs (still with some tail) of the following species: Litoria peronii, L. fallax, Rana sylvatica and
Heleioporus australiacus. The only one that has a decent amount of tail is the Heleioporus, however the photo of it
1071:
Man, thanks for askin'. Never tried to take a photo of a frog. Am in an inner city 'burb and the only ones I've seen are the brown marsh (?) frogs. Next time we get a downpour I'll give it a go. I have been trying to snap a few birds and been to museums in Sydney
Melbourne and Brisbane for Dino
1675:. I know it's a bit late to reply, but I only noticed the comment on Mike's page a few minutes ago and wanted to clear things up. I did not place that in-text tag. I don't know who did, but it wasn't me. I was only reverting vandalism and I guess someone I was reverting to must have added it.
1638:
photo, however this is not always the case. P. bibronii is highly variable, however they normally are a lot more grey or brown in comparision to that reddish colour of that frog. As to your request for a close up, I'm afraid I don't have anything much closer than the photo which I uploaded
116:
Unfortunately the way the pics are aligned doesn't work properly in IE. I had it like that and thought everything was alright until I saw the page in IE. There is a big gap between "Critically endangered species" and the list of critically endangered species. I tried to figure out a way of
2081:
Hey don't worry, you didn't offend me. I hope your exams went well; I've still got one to go. I especially wish you well if you're doing HSC or somesuch. T2 is (or was) some wikipedia guideline/clause which was going to mean NPOV was enforced on userpages I believe. Anyway all the best •
1025:
Hi Ev. Thanks for the query. Ye, I do have quite a lot of photos of different speciess of frogs found up here - but many of them I haven't been able to identify. If you might be able to identify them and if you wish, I could send some to you for captions and then we could post them.
283:
Just would like your opinion on what else should go into the article, all the inline refs are done. I know you wanted winter breeding habitat to go in, but I still haven't been able to find anything about it, do you have any papers/websites that have something about that. Cheers --
960:
OK, fair enough, I was looking at it from a purely aesthetic value where the replacement is obviously superior. But I'm no expert on a frog's anatomy and if it doesn't adequetly show the frog, than feel free to revert (although it'd be good to keep the replacement on the article)
253:
Thanks for helping out with the article, but I don't like the seperation of the table. It stuffs up their widths at my resolution. I also don't see an advantage to it, so it seems like it has been worsened aethsetically for no gain. What was the reason for the change? Thanks
453:
Frost D.R., Grant, T., Faivovich, J., Bain, R.H., Haas, A., Haddad, C.F.B., de Sa, R.O., Channing, A., Wilkinson, M., Donnellan, S.C., Raxworthy, C.J., Campbell, J.A., Blotto, B.L., Moler, P., Drewes, R.C., Nussbaum, R.A., Lynch, J.D., Green, D.M. & Wheeler, W.C. (2006)
1468:
showing the most tail isn't exactly focused and the frog is in my hand. Sorry but thats all I got, if you would like to use any I would be happy to upload them (all those times when I've seen metamorph Lim. peronii in my pond and not taken any photos...)--
558:
Many thanks for the barnstar. I'm impressed that the amphibian articles are still going as strong as they are - you're contributing to probably one of the most active WikiProjects around. Fantastic effort - no doubt you'll be due another one soon! :) -
1709:. The date given by ITIS any many other sites is 1866, although palaeology sites seem to prefer 1886 (we will ignore the Russian site which gives 1827, 13 years before E.D.Cope was born!) I will amend to 1866 with a note on the discussion page.--
1363:
Thank you very much for the barnstar. I will continue to do my best to improve the articles on amphibians and continue to work on wikipedia well into the future. By the way, good work on all the articles you've been creating lately. Once again
1731:
knowledgeable on those matters, although I am certainly interested in them. I see that you have been very active, puts me to shame, but I suppose we all do what we can. See you round. Feel free to delete this message once you have read it.
692:
This is why, for files that I may save in various different versions, I append the date to the file name, in the weird order 20060816. Why NCurses suggested we do it that way for the biology portal could well be a different story... -
1749:
propaganda and must be stopped. Your nation is teetering on the brink of civil war, but you refuse to see the forest for the trees. Your nation's inhabitants are ugly and their mother's dress them funny. And other silly quips. ;) -
772:
I was waiting for my academic contact to give a hand with providing references, but I guess it isn't happening. It needs those six (?) points referenced, and then it's ready for FAC. I don't see any great benefit in another PR. -
264:
Well, just the general idea that when you have two things, you should have two tables. I see only a small white space and the table borders. I don't know how it could affect the widths of the tables which I see as exactly equal.
1634:
ravenii, however there distribution currently did not reach into New South Wales, so it is either P. ravenii or P. major. P. bibronii usually (from personal experience) have many small red dots over there back like in
800:
and before I add anymore info I'd like to know if you think it is worth being a article. A lot of the info is repeated somewhere else on wiki 'cos most Aus frog are endemic anyway. What are your thoughts? Cheers --
1580:
I have a good photo of Lim. peronii spawn (there is heaps in my pond at the moment) as well as some young tadpoles. I can upload these photos today after school. I will also have a look to see what else I
1902:
Thanks for your invite to join WP:Amphibians, but I'm not sure if I'm enough of a froggy person - a couple of lectures, pracs and a dissection (Cane Toad, ofc! ;) ) does not an amphibian buff make.  :) -
1513:
at the end of this month, (and probably various other time throughout the frogging season) but I'd say that the Mixos wouldn't be metamorphing until sometime after
January unless they overwintered. --
1348:
Just on the note of the Neobatrachus frogs, I will be heading out west (Mudgee, Dubbo, etc.) in October and I should be able to get a Neobatrachus sudelli photo (hopefully a few others as well).--
1987:
625:
That is a really good article LiquidGhoul/Archive 4! I'll help you the best I can, but only on the weekend, cause school has been very demanding these days. Okay, catch ya around, take care --
1555:
My mum has been raising some tadpoles at her place. We were raising them to test my identification skills, as I am not very good with tadpoles (I got it right though!). They turned out to be
1457:), so I'll see then. In the mean time I will have a more detailed look through all my photos today and tomorrow and give you a list of everything that I have all stage including froglet.--
2026:
Evan, if my memory serves me correctly, they figured out there were another 2 species or so species of Mixo's up in in something like 1994, but didn't describe them until now. --
849:
Thanks, I would of forgot. I knew it was going to be on the main page today but I was out all day tadpoling at Darkes Forest. It just slipped my mine. Thanks for the reminder. --
1103:. You've already had it peer reviewed, so just go for it. I'll take a more detailed look at it and make some specific suggestions/make some edits on it on the talk page. Cheers.
1799:. I thought the last record was in 1994 aswell. It would be in one of the folloing papers: Ingram & McDonald 1993, Marshall 1988, Hero 1994 or Environment Australia 1999.
730:
Nice to know that you're using Linux. GNU (the commandline interface) really is the best for usability and power out of all the *nixes. How did I survive before I discovered
758:
LG, marine mammals are not my bailiwick in particular, but I have references and can take a crack at it once I can clear the decks of some other things on my desk.
1812:
1383:
1132:
337:
1706:
but now you mention it the date does seem to be wrong. I think it has become mixed up with the date that Furbringer raised it to an infraorder Xenosauri - see
908:
Thats what I have, however I haven't uploaded all of my photos so they can't all be links. When I get around to uploading a photo I will add a link. Cheers––
1596:
1076:
I'm afraid I can't help you; I may do a lot with FPC but I can't take a good photo to save my life. I don't see too many frogs around my place anyway.
1453:
have barely any metamorph photos, however, I'm going out frogging this weekend and I might be able to get a photo of a metamorph (most likely to be
1010:
Hello again Ev, did you see the recent news about New Guinea, they found about 52 new species in Papua province of Indonesia, Western New Guinea. --
298:
Opps, typo, thanks. But Is can't really write anything on winter habitat then... Is there anything else that should be included in the article? --
686:
which may be an FAT32. In this case, you may have to set special permissions when you mount the drive in order to keep the original time stamps.
523:
Have you downloaded the "THE AMPHIBIAN TREE OF LIFE" paper? If so have you seen page 362? Am I reading it wrong or have they gone and placed all
1796:
1958:
165:
criticism in a very congenial manner. A great many of contributors could learn a LOT from your diplomatic methods. Good on ya! Keep it up!
1495:
metamorph pic (pretty unlikely though) this weekend. (going back to Darkes Forest with Marion, getting chytrid swabs this time) Cheers --
607:. The school was indeed started in 1957 as per their home page and the category you added was non-existant. I can't see why you thought
1051:
By the way, I live on a block of land about 25 km west of Cooktown in the Endeavour River Valley (about half a km from the main river).
1099:
some photos. As for the article, I see I graded it a B class - great work. The only way to improve that rating is to get it listed as a
1599:. The only problem I think with the spawn is that not many eggs are visible, I could take another photo if you think it is better.--
1771:. If you need copies of any research papers email me a list and I will and send you pdfs of the articles (if they're available).--
1967:
Our pic on Commons is without mention of author and license. Could you arrange that? If not, this file run the risk of delation
1768:
1000:
Hi Ev, I'll find out more about it (birds most likely) and hopefully I can contribute something to expand the article. Regards--
712:
I program a bit in Perl (this comes from having done DNA sequence analysis, for which Perl for many years was the best tool). -
223:
1267:
1243:
69:
64:
59:
1635:
1315:
Hi, sorry it took so long for me to get back to you, I've been on holiday. You may or may not know that all the parts of the
188:, where he was previously linked as "Cogger", and I put a link to what seems to be his website in the edit summary. Regards,
1839:, which you created. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the
1410:, which you created. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the
1159:, which you created. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the
364:, which you created. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the
236:
The new flora article is up. If you want to help out, fungi, lichens and non-vascular plants could all use some expansion.--
1320:
1080:
976:
1204:
1195:
I think your best bet (and mine) is to re-read the peer review comments, not all of which have probably been addressed. -
782:
743:
721:
702:
568:
197:
184:
a few more times than I have, you're probably in a better situation to write a stub about him. I put the correct link in
1948:
I would say this is very unlikely. There's 1 (one) paid developer working on MediaWiki and miracles cannot be expected.
476:
1592:
1491:
pic to illustrate the frog. I will go and get a few pics now. If I can't find any metamorphs I might be able to get a
649:
247:
2008:. Since I don't have access to the journal except the abstract which doesn't tell the new names, I found the names
1840:
1509:
I couldn't find any metamorphs in my pond and all the spawn had hatch (or was eaten). I'm going to a site that has
1411:
1160:
365:
185:
38:
1986:
image to Commons, and took the opportunity to give it a more descriptive name than "Banksia sp.jpg". It is now at
1483:
I have photos of tadpoles, spawn and frog for several species, but don't have and froglet photos at all! I reckon
502:
I just reverted a edit on the Rove McManus article. He removed the tag you placed and did what you said not to do.
1054:
PS If you want me to email photos to you - please send me your email address - mine is (removed for spam safety)
89:
Good work on the origins section! I've had a bit of a look for info and been struggling to find any :) Cheers --
537:
1935:
1863:
Both. It says on the frogsaustralia.net website that call and belly markings can distinguish it from all other
1672:
1671:
Hey LiquidGhoul, this is just a belated response to the Rove section above and the corresponding comment at
1449:
1189:
797:
506:
891:. I was there as well, we went with Marion Anstis (the author of the tadpole book), so it was a good day.--
1811:
1715:
1382:
1131:
934:
378:
336:
1827:
1684:
1421:
1398:
1302:
1147:
352:
226:- I have to finish the angiosperms, and I will probably move it into the main namespace in a few days.--
47:
17:
2117:
meetings are at Homebush) it was raining and we picked up a bell frog just jumping across the road.--
2049:
2032:
2013:
2009:
1949:
1658:
1649:
1545:
1532:
1519:
1501:
1405:
1224:
1215:
985:
880:
855:
834:
821:
807:
612:
543:
419:
403:
317:
304:
290:
150:
137:
123:
109:
95:
1991:
1170:
994:
928:
689:
In a nutshell, this is one of those cases where the "works out of the box" assumption breaks down.
510:
359:
212:
166:
1174:
1754:
442:(but I think I saw a photographs of a juvenile Rhinodermatidae somewhere in Knowledge (XXG)) or
2088:
2071:
1867:
and in "A Field Guide to Frogs of Australia" that its most readily distinguished by call from
1710:
1262:
1238:
1200:
1178:
778:
739:
717:
698:
564:
375:
193:
1707:
1257:
My mental "to do" list for Knowledge (XXG) just keeps growing... I'd like to take a week off
2118:
2107:
1834:
1732:
1680:
1640:
1610:
1600:
1582:
1565:
1469:
1458:
1435:
1365:
1349:
1339:
1154:
947:
909:
892:
632:
604:
589:
255:
480:
423:
422:!I am new on Knowledge (XXG), but very excited to contribute to Knowledge (XXG) and to the
2044:
2027:
1850:
1782:
1772:
1653:
1540:
1527:
1514:
1496:
1324:
1284:
1219:
980:
875:
850:
829:
816:
802:
731:
663:
653:
487:
439:
398:
312:
299:
285:
237:
227:
145:
132:
118:
104:
90:
1100:
449:
I dont know if you are familiar with a large scientific paper published some months ago:
117:
accommodate for both browsers but only could come up with what it was before. Cheers --
2121:
2110:
2093:
2076:
2051:
2034:
2020:
2005:
1994:
1952:
1938:
1921:
1907:
1904:
1892:
1889:
1853:
1785:
1775:
1757:
1746:
1735:
1720:
1698:
Many of these, including Anguidae, came from the Center for North American Herpetology
1688:
1660:
1643:
1613:
1603:
1585:
1568:
1547:
1534:
1521:
1503:
1472:
1461:
1438:
1424:
1368:
1352:
1342:
1327:
1305:
1287:
1272:
1248:
1226:
1208:
1182:
1116:
1107:
1077:
1061:
1058:
1033:
1030:
1014:
1004:
987:
965:
950:
912:
895:
882:
857:
836:
823:
809:
786:
762:
759:
747:
725:
706:
666:
656:
638:
615:
608:
593:
572:
545:
513:
490:
431:
427:
405:
387:
319:
306:
292:
269:
258:
240:
230:
201:
169:
152:
139:
125:
111:
97:
1751:
276:
266:
181:
1888:(and bird) numbers and species in the Cooktown region recently is quite frightening
2083:
2066:
1918:
1703:
Xenosauridae I think came from the Zoological Record Index to Organism Names (ION)
1448:
I have photos of a number of species of their entire life cycle. Take a look at my
1389:
1294:
1196:
1113:
1104:
1011:
1001:
962:
774:
735:
713:
694:
560:
496:
443:
189:
1931:
Thanks for telling me about WikiProject Australia, thanks, I've now alredy joined
648:
Hi, when I was making the fauna of Ausralia article I made this, admittedly lame,
1254:
Lucky you! I wish I could do the same. Instead, I seem to be busier than ever. :/
1112:
P.S - This is the only semi decent photo I have, I also have it in higher res -
2017:
1434:
I'll get to work, I'll start on the Cyclorana then move to the limno's. Cheers--
923:
627:
585:
435:
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
397:
lol, I've had that paper for a while and never noticed :) Too much to read. --
1630:
874:
spawn and taddies and a few newly hatch L.jervisiensis, I think thats all. --
682:
467:
have been addopted by most global scientific and conservation sources (e.g.,
1818:
1138:
1338:
would be better if a photo of that species was going to be on wiki soon).--
1237:
Your dedication is really inspiring! :) Great work. Nice photos, too. :) --
2016:. At zoobank.org you can get alerts when they update their species lists.
1091:
1704:
1699:
343:
652:, I was hoping that you might want to work on it if you get a chance. --
2106:
How was the bell frogging? Where about did you go and what did you see?
1072:
skeletons in the past few weeks.Cas Liber 11:51, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
943:
1970:
Friendly. (Oxam Hartog from Commons). 23:09, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
458:. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 297, 1–370. (
1090:
472:
459:
455:
979:
is a PDF on the Reptiles of New Guinea. Hope it helps. Cheers --
1822:
1393:
1142:
347:
1552:
Hey guys, I am replying here, as I want to talk to both of you.
468:
25:
1988:
Image:Banksia integrifolia subsp. monticola inflorescence.jpg
1218:
what the peer review came up with some are already done. --
1982:
Hi, just a courtesy call to let you know that I moved your
815:
Most of the info was taken from the genera articles :) --
942:
and my very herp-aware teenage son worked for a while at
939:
1875:"similar Species" it says that it is distinguished from
1677:
Anyway, I just wanted to clear that misunderstanding up.
681:
However, when transferring files between machines, some
503:
211:
i just thought it would look nicer in blue, ya know.
1283:
Hi! Unfortunately I dont have a pic of Allophryne. --
1781:
For some reason I imagined you slighly younger :) --
1629:
If the photo you want to compare with is the one on
1487:
would be easiest. I think that we can just use your
866:, spawn and tadpoles (there was also one calling),
1066:
582:Is that your cat? (also, thanks for stepping in)
426:. Regarding your question, I dont have photos of
1767:Hi, I saw that you're going to be working on
975:You may have already have come across it but
222:Hi, I've largely rewritten this article, see
8:
1597:Image:Limnodynastes peronii (tadpoles) 4.JPG
1526:Did you find any morphs while swabbing? --
1261:and just sit down and get through it. :) --
1806:
1377:
1126:
331:
224:User:Petaholmes/Sandbox/Flora of Australia
1831:was updated with a fact from the article
1402:was updated with a fact from the article
1151:was updated with a fact from the article
603:Hi LiquidGhoul. I reverted your edit to
483:should addopt these changes. I can help!
356:was updated with a fact from the article
1959:Image:Chamelaucium uncinatum close.jpg
1539:What species did you see, or hear? --
1297:thing made the news here in Australia.
411:Families and classification of Anurans
44:Do not edit the contents of this page.
1319:on frogs are freely availabe as pdfs
1067:I'll keep an eye out.................
7:
1301:Well, I might have seen it on fox.--
926:family, too, with several different
475:), and also national sources (e.g.,
481:WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles
424:WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles
180:Since you seem to have come across
24:
1917:Thanks for your support there. --
131:Yeah, that works out. Cheers, --
1810:
1769:Decline in amphibian populations
1381:
1130:
335:
29:
418:Thanks for your nice "welcome"
1758:16:24, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
1736:04:04, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
1721:18:30, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
1689:11:11, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
1661:01:25, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
1644:00:50, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
1548:01:58, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
1535:22:01, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
1522:11:50, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
1504:05:37, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
1473:11:13, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
1462:05:31, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
1439:11:34, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
1425:02:02, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
1039:Frogs of Cape York Peninsula 2
1015:23:23, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
870:spawn and newly hatched tads,
460:PDF available by clicking here
1:
2122:19:57, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
2111:12:39, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
2094:00:05, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
2077:11:02, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
1673:User_talk:Michaelbeckham#Rove
1369:11:46, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
1353:09:47, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
1343:08:59, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
1328:04:29, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
1306:23:34, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
1288:01:39, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
1273:08:05, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
1249:07:06, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
1169:Congratulations on behalf of
938:. We're moderately active in
2052:07:54, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
2035:05:02, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
2021:13:26, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
1995:04:35, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
1953:20:49, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
1939:02:42, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
1922:09:09, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
1908:12:39, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
1614:05:34, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
1604:08:57, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
1593:Image:Lim. peronii spawn.JPG
1586:22:20, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
1569:12:38, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
1021:Frogs of Cape York Peninsula
1893:04:05, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
1854:00:00, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
1786:01:40, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
1776:01:20, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
1745:Obviously you are creating
1227:21:45, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
1209:16:59, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
1183:03:30, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
1117:10:54, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
1108:10:35, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
1081:13:08, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
1062:22:56, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
1034:07:58, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
1005:12:00, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
988:05:55, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
966:09:11, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
951:07:38, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
913:21:27, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
896:09:27, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
883:09:20, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
858:09:01, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
837:07:34, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
824:06:27, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
810:06:19, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
787:11:49, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
763:19:49, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
748:16:28, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
726:16:21, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
707:16:01, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
667:02:20, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
657:01:46, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
650:List of Australian reptiles
639:22:55, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
616:16:06, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
594:14:23, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
573:09:26, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
546:11:13, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
514:06:47, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
473:Global Amphibian Assessment
248:List of Testudines families
170:14:59, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
2138:
491:16:01, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
456:The Amphibian Tree of Life
406:07:32, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
388:17:24, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
328:Fauna of New Guinea on DYK
320:04:30, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
307:03:22, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
293:02:49, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
241:00:11, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
186:Green and Golden Bell Frog
1841:"Did you know?" talk page
1564:amplexing pair. Thanks --
1412:"Did you know?" talk page
1161:"Did you know?" talk page
519:Taxonomy of Pelodryadinae
366:"Did you know?" talk page
270:23:23, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
259:22:39, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
231:06:42, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
202:16:36, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
153:06:59, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
140:22:36, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
126:11:32, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
112:10:22, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
98:10:16, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
2004:The paper's abstract is
1944:Obsoleted categorisation
1190:Amphibians of Australia
611:'s edit was vandalism.
507:User talk:202.0.106.130
85:Amphibians of Australia
1561:mature tadpole --: -->
1095:
971:Reptiles of New Guinea
1859:Crinia parinsignifera
1560:young tadpole --: -->
1094:
796:I've been working on
621:WikiProject Indonesia
477:Amphibians of Ecuador
42:of past discussions.
18:User talk:LiquidGhoul
1936:John Harrison Highns
1591:Here are the photos
1406:Northern Barred Frog
1214:I made a list on my
944:Canberra Exotic Pets
479:). I think that the
1726:Hi from Nick Thorne
1694:Reptile authorities
1455:Litoria littlejohni
995:Fauna of New Guinea
922:Hi, Evan. We are a
754:Fauna of New Guinea
360:Fauna of New Guinea
213:User:Mickeynotmouse
1652:is a close-up. --
1479:Re:Frog life cycle
1317:Fauna of Australia
1096:
311:Yep. Thanks :) --
1847:
1846:
1719:
1562:morphling --: -->
1418:
1417:
1271:
1247:
1167:
1166:
918:Thanks for thanks
555:Hey liquidGhoul,
505:. It was done by
384:
372:
371:
82:
81:
54:
53:
48:current talk page
2129:
2091:
2086:
2074:
2069:
1835:Wrinkled Toadlet
1814:
1807:
1713:
1385:
1378:
1311:Australian frogs
1265:
1241:
1155:Desert Tree Frog
1134:
1127:
637:
635:
630:
605:Applewild School
599:Applewild School
592:
540:
385:
380:
339:
332:
78:
56:
55:
33:
32:
26:
2137:
2136:
2132:
2131:
2130:
2128:
2127:
2126:
2101:
2089:
2084:
2072:
2067:
2062:
2060:Cathedral Photo
2002:
1980:
1962:
1950:Pavel Vozenilek
1946:
1929:
1915:
1900:
1885:
1883:Congratulations
1861:
1805:
1794:
1792:T. acutirostris
1765:
1743:
1728:
1696:
1669:
1624:
1609:same species?--
1481:
1446:
1444:frog life cycle
1432:
1376:
1361:
1335:
1313:
1299:
1281:
1235:
1193:
1125:
1089:
1069:
1041:
1023:
998:
973:
958:
920:
906:
847:
845:Re:Featured pic
828:No worries. --
794:
770:
756:
675:
662:Neat, thanks.--
646:
633:
631:
626:
623:
613:Robert Brockway
601:
583:
580:
578:Britishblue.jpg
553:
551:Barnstar thanks
538:
521:
500:
440:Rhinodermatidae
413:
395:
379:
330:
281:
251:
220:
209:
207:Hey, sorry dude
178:
103:lol, thanks --
87:
74:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
2135:
2133:
2125:
2124:
2100:
2097:
2061:
2058:
2057:
2056:
2055:
2054:
2001:
1998:
1979:
1972:
1961:
1956:
1945:
1942:
1928:
1925:
1914:
1911:
1899:
1896:
1884:
1881:
1877:parinsignifera
1860:
1857:
1845:
1844:
1815:
1804:
1801:
1793:
1790:
1789:
1788:
1764:
1761:
1742:
1739:
1727:
1724:
1695:
1692:
1678:
1676:
1668:
1665:
1664:
1663:
1623:
1622:bibronii/major
1620:
1619:
1618:
1617:
1616:
1578:
1577:
1576:
1575:
1574:
1573:
1572:
1571:
1553:
1480:
1477:
1476:
1475:
1445:
1442:
1431:
1428:
1416:
1415:
1386:
1375:
1372:
1360:
1357:
1356:
1355:
1334:
1331:
1312:
1309:
1298:
1291:
1280:
1277:
1276:
1275:
1255:
1234:
1231:
1230:
1229:
1192:
1186:
1165:
1164:
1135:
1124:
1121:
1119:
1088:
1085:
1084:
1083:
1068:
1065:
1040:
1037:
1022:
1019:
1018:
1017:
997:
991:
972:
969:
957:
954:
919:
916:
905:
902:
901:
900:
899:
898:
846:
843:
842:
841:
840:
839:
793:
790:
769:
766:
755:
752:
751:
750:
728:
674:
671:
670:
669:
645:
642:
622:
619:
600:
597:
579:
576:
552:
549:
520:
517:
511:- Mike Beckham
499:
494:
464:
463:
432:Heleophrynidae
428:Arthroleptidae
412:
409:
394:
391:
370:
369:
340:
329:
326:
325:
324:
323:
322:
280:
274:
273:
272:
250:
245:
244:
243:
219:
216:
208:
205:
177:
174:
162:
161:
160:
159:
158:
157:
156:
155:
86:
83:
80:
79:
72:
67:
62:
52:
51:
34:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2134:
2123:
2120:
2115:
2114:
2113:
2112:
2109:
2104:
2099:bell frogging
2098:
2096:
2095:
2092:
2087:
2079:
2078:
2075:
2070:
2059:
2053:
2050:
2048:
2047:
2042:
2039:Nope, it was
2038:
2037:
2036:
2033:
2031:
2030:
2025:
2024:
2023:
2022:
2019:
2015:
2011:
2007:
2000:New Mixophyes
1999:
1997:
1996:
1993:
1989:
1985:
1977:
1973:
1971:
1968:
1965:
1960:
1957:
1955:
1954:
1951:
1943:
1941:
1940:
1937:
1934:Kind regards
1932:
1926:
1924:
1923:
1920:
1912:
1910:
1909:
1906:
1897:
1895:
1894:
1891:
1882:
1880:
1878:
1874:
1870:
1866:
1858:
1856:
1855:
1852:
1842:
1838:
1837:
1836:
1830:
1829:
1828:Did you know?
1824:
1820:
1816:
1813:
1809:
1808:
1802:
1800:
1798:
1791:
1787:
1784:
1780:
1779:
1778:
1777:
1774:
1770:
1762:
1760:
1759:
1756:
1753:
1748:
1740:
1738:
1737:
1734:
1725:
1723:
1722:
1717:
1712:
1708:
1705:
1701:
1700:
1693:
1691:
1690:
1686:
1682:
1674:
1666:
1662:
1659:
1657:
1656:
1651:
1648:
1647:
1646:
1645:
1642:
1637:
1632:
1627:
1621:
1615:
1612:
1607:
1606:
1605:
1602:
1598:
1594:
1590:
1589:
1588:
1587:
1584:
1570:
1567:
1563:adult --: -->
1558:
1554:
1551:
1550:
1549:
1546:
1544:
1543:
1538:
1537:
1536:
1533:
1531:
1530:
1525:
1524:
1523:
1520:
1518:
1517:
1512:
1508:
1507:
1506:
1505:
1502:
1500:
1499:
1494:
1493:L.littlejohni
1490:
1486:
1478:
1474:
1471:
1466:
1465:
1464:
1463:
1460:
1456:
1451:
1443:
1441:
1440:
1437:
1430:frog articles
1429:
1427:
1426:
1423:
1422:Andrew Levine
1413:
1409:
1408:
1407:
1401:
1400:
1399:Did you know?
1395:
1391:
1387:
1384:
1380:
1379:
1373:
1371:
1370:
1367:
1358:
1354:
1351:
1347:
1346:
1345:
1344:
1341:
1333:frog articles
1332:
1330:
1329:
1326:
1322:
1318:
1310:
1308:
1307:
1304:
1303:Greasysteve13
1296:
1292:
1290:
1289:
1286:
1278:
1274:
1269:
1264:
1260:
1256:
1253:
1252:
1251:
1250:
1245:
1240:
1232:
1228:
1225:
1223:
1222:
1217:
1213:
1212:
1211:
1210:
1206:
1202:
1198:
1191:
1187:
1185:
1184:
1180:
1176:
1172:
1171:User:Blnguyen
1162:
1158:
1157:
1156:
1150:
1149:
1148:Did you know?
1144:
1140:
1136:
1133:
1129:
1128:
1122:
1120:
1118:
1115:
1110:
1109:
1106:
1102:
1093:
1086:
1082:
1079:
1075:
1074:
1073:
1064:
1063:
1060:
1055:
1052:
1049:
1045:
1038:
1036:
1035:
1032:
1027:
1020:
1016:
1013:
1009:
1008:
1007:
1006:
1003:
996:
992:
990:
989:
986:
984:
983:
978:
970:
968:
967:
964:
955:
953:
952:
949:
945:
941:
937:
936:
931:
930:
925:
917:
915:
914:
911:
904:re suggestion
903:
897:
894:
890:
886:
885:
884:
881:
879:
878:
873:
869:
865:
864:L.littlejohni
862:
861:
860:
859:
856:
854:
853:
844:
838:
835:
833:
832:
827:
826:
825:
822:
820:
819:
814:
813:
812:
811:
808:
806:
805:
799:
792:Aus frog list
791:
789:
788:
784:
780:
776:
767:
765:
764:
761:
753:
749:
745:
741:
737:
733:
729:
727:
723:
719:
715:
711:
710:
709:
708:
704:
700:
696:
690:
687:
684:
679:
672:
668:
665:
661:
660:
659:
658:
655:
651:
643:
641:
640:
636:
629:
620:
618:
617:
614:
610:
606:
598:
596:
595:
591:
587:
577:
575:
574:
570:
566:
562:
556:
550:
548:
547:
544:
542:
541:
534:
530:
526:
518:
516:
515:
512:
508:
504:
498:
495:
493:
492:
489:
484:
482:
478:
474:
470:
461:
457:
452:
451:
450:
447:
445:
441:
437:
433:
429:
425:
421:
416:
410:
408:
407:
404:
402:
401:
393:Re:Opisthodon
392:
390:
389:
386:
383:
377:
367:
363:
362:
361:
355:
354:
353:Did you know?
349:
345:
341:
338:
334:
333:
327:
321:
318:
316:
315:
310:
309:
308:
305:
303:
302:
297:
296:
295:
294:
291:
289:
288:
278:
275:
271:
268:
263:
262:
261:
260:
257:
249:
246:
242:
239:
235:
234:
233:
232:
229:
225:
217:
215:
214:
206:
204:
203:
199:
195:
191:
187:
183:
182:Harold Cogger
175:
173:
171:
168:
154:
151:
149:
148:
143:
142:
141:
138:
136:
135:
130:
129:
127:
124:
122:
121:
115:
114:
113:
110:
108:
107:
102:
101:
100:
99:
96:
94:
93:
84:
77:
73:
71:
68:
66:
63:
61:
58:
57:
49:
45:
41:
40:
35:
28:
27:
19:
2105:
2102:
2080:
2063:
2045:
2040:
2028:
2003:
1983:
1981:
1975:
1969:
1966:
1963:
1947:
1933:
1930:
1916:
1901:
1886:
1876:
1872:
1868:
1864:
1862:
1848:
1833:
1832:
1826:
1795:
1766:
1744:
1729:
1711:Keith Edkins
1702:
1697:
1670:
1654:
1628:
1625:
1579:
1557:Lim. peronii
1556:
1541:
1528:
1515:
1510:
1497:
1492:
1489:Lim. peronii
1488:
1485:Lim. peronii
1484:
1482:
1454:
1447:
1433:
1419:
1404:
1403:
1397:
1390:10 September
1362:
1336:
1316:
1314:
1300:
1295:Edvard Munch
1293:I think the
1282:
1263:pfctdayelise
1258:
1239:pfctdayelise
1236:
1220:
1194:
1168:
1153:
1152:
1146:
1111:
1101:good article
1097:
1087:Froggy stuff
1070:
1057:Best wishes
1056:
1053:
1050:
1046:
1042:
1028:
1024:
999:
981:
974:
959:
933:
927:
921:
907:
888:
876:
872:C. signifera
871:
868:L.verreauxii
867:
863:
851:
848:
830:
817:
803:
795:
771:
757:
691:
688:
680:
676:
647:
624:
602:
581:
557:
554:
536:
532:
528:
524:
522:
501:
497:Rove McManus
485:
469:IUCN redlist
465:
448:
444:Sooglossidae
417:
414:
399:
396:
381:
373:
358:
357:
351:
313:
300:
286:
282:
252:
221:
210:
179:
163:
146:
133:
119:
105:
91:
88:
75:
43:
37:
1747:Frog Nation
1733:Nick Thorne
1681:Sarah Ewart
1566:liquidGhoul
956:Re:Bullfrog
948:Peter Ellis
935:P. viticeps
887:You forgot
683:ftp clients
673:Date format
529:Nyctimystes
436:Hemisotidae
256:liquidGhoul
36:This is an
2103:Hi Evan,
2046:Froggydarb
2029:Froggydarb
1741:Propaganda
1655:Froggydarb
1626:Hey Evan,
1542:Froggydarb
1529:Froggydarb
1516:Froggydarb
1498:Froggydarb
1285:DFCisneros
1279:Allophryne
1268:translate?
1244:translate?
1221:Froggydarb
982:Froggydarb
946:. Cheers,
889:Paracrinia
877:Froggydarb
852:Froggydarb
831:Froggydarb
818:Froggydarb
804:Froggydarb
539:Froggydarb
488:DFCisneros
486:Cheers, --
400:Froggydarb
314:Froggydarb
301:Froggydarb
287:Froggydarb
147:Froggydarb
144:Oppps! --
134:Froggydarb
120:Froggydarb
106:Froggydarb
92:Froggydarb
2041:Mixophyes
1992:Hesperian
1927:Thank You
1913:Humourous
1905:Malkinann
1890:John Hill
1879:by call.
1871:. In the
1869:signifera
1819:5 October
1639:before.--
1511:Mixophyes
1364:thanks!--
1216:todo page
1139:30 August
1078:Raven4x4x
1059:John Hill
1031:John Hill
609:Greenshed
525:Cyclorana
509:. Thanks
172:thepearl
167:The Pearl
76:Archive 4
70:Archive 3
65:Archive 2
60:Archive 1
1752:UtherSRG
1679:Cheers,
1205:contribs
1029:Cheers,
783:contribs
744:contribs
722:contribs
703:contribs
644:Reptiles
569:contribs
344:5 August
267:Rmhermen
198:contribs
1984:Banksia
1976:Banksia
1919:Guinnog
1873:sloanei
1763:Decline
1581:have.--
1359:Thanks!
1197:Samsara
1175:Bravada
1114:Iorek85
1105:Iorek85
1012:Stavenn
1002:Stavenn
963:Fir0002
929:Tiliqua
775:Samsara
768:Tuatara
736:Samsara
734:? :) -
714:Samsara
695:Samsara
561:Samsara
535:??? --
533:Litoria
420:message
279:article
190:Samsara
39:archive
2043::) --
2018:Isfisk
1964:Hello
1898:Thanks
1865:Crinia
1755:(talk)
1233:Photos
932:and a
760:Arjuna
471:, the
176:Cogger
2119:Tnarg
2108:Tnarg
1978:image
1974:Your
1641:Tnarg
1611:Tnarg
1601:Tnarg
1583:Tnarg
1470:Tnarg
1459:Tnarg
1436:Tnarg
1366:Tnarg
1350:Tnarg
1340:Tnarg
910:Tnarg
893:Tnarg
732:pipes
415:Hi!!
376:Scott
218:Flora
16:<
2014:here
2012:and
2010:here
2006:here
1851:Peta
1823:2006
1797:This
1783:Peta
1773:Peta
1716:Talk
1685:Talk
1667:Rove
1650:Here
1636:this
1631:this
1595:and
1450:list
1394:2006
1325:Peta
1321:here
1259:life
1201:talk
1188:Re:
1179:talk
1143:2006
1123:DYK!
993:Re:
977:here
940:MARK
924:herp
798:this
779:talk
740:talk
718:talk
699:talk
664:Peta
654:Peta
565:talk
527:and
348:2006
277:GGBF
238:Peta
228:Peta
194:talk
1817:On
1803:DYK
1388:On
1374:DYK
1137:On
634:eng
628:Imo
590:fgs
586:ptk
531:in
374:--
342:On
2090:on
2085:Le
2073:on
2068:Le
1990:.
1849:--
1843:.
1825:,
1821:,
1714:(
1687:)
1420:--
1414:.
1396:,
1392:,
1207:)
1203:•
1181:-
1177:,
1173:--
1163:.
1145:,
1141:,
961:--
785:)
781:•
746:)
742:•
724:)
720:•
705:)
701:•
571:)
567:•
446:.
438:,
434:,
430:,
368:.
350:,
346:,
254:--
200:)
196:•
128:.
1718:)
1683:(
1270:)
1266:(
1246:)
1242:(
1199:(
777:(
738:(
716:(
697:(
588:âś°
584:—
563:(
462:)
382:e
192:(
50:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.