772:
psycho like some soap fans when it comes to *their* couple(s). I didn't realize more was going to be changed that shouldn't have been. It was completely innocent and non-malicious. Not my intention to change information that shouldn't have been changed, thought I had gone back to a safe edit of the page. And yes, I used to be MF7676; got the name change back in 2012, as it wasn't *me* any longer. And it wasn't until my name change that I took editing on Wiki more seriously.
511:
31:
364:. When I go to those pages, they seem to me to be that Brod123 purports them to be: the pages assert either that these are actors who play on this show, or characters from the show. I'm sure it's possible that all of those articles are also incorrect, but on first glance they look fine to me. So is there some possibility that you're mistaken about this being vandalism, or am I completely misreading the situation here? Thanks,
655:, has falsified couples on that list before. I can't pinpoint if this IP has a registered account and if I've interacted with that account before (I'd have to check the list's edit history to see if I've reverted that IP before), but I do vaguely remember it. Its edit history shows it to be occasionally problematic at that list. So, yes, that is one returning user to worry about, but not worry too much about.
670:{{Ping|Flyer22} Well, given their user edit history, I find it suspicious they keep added low-reliable sources or none at all to what they're adding, so it'll continue to be removed. Like I said, will be keeping an eye on the page from now on, and overtime will be making some fixes because it's a serious mess right now.
598:
Thanks. I saw that some of the editors, such as yourself, had not posted since I left that message at WP:SOAPS, but now that it's two days later, I figured that WP:SOAPS are not concerned about the matter. I was thinking of pinging a few active WP:SOAPS editors there to see what their take is; then I
1107:
Hi, I just saw an edit summary of yours in the Demi Lovato article, you said that
Idolator's reliability had been proved already; is there any discussion where such subject was discussed? If there is, could you please provide me with a link? Thank you in advance! (by the way, sorry for not following
1083:
exist. Plus, the album's release is long far off and he is not creditable enough of an artist to have an article for an album based off of that. That was my reason for redirecting the article, however, if I'm protested of it, then I'm protested of it. However, I still believe it is far too early for
771:
I wouldn't get into an edit-war. I simply went back to a former edit, believing it to be a safe edit; I should've paid further attention to what would've been removed/changed. I was attempting to remove the addition of unsourced couple(s). Nothing was targeted against one couple for another, I'm not
748:
On a side note: I didn't get conformation that you used to be MusicFreak7676 until I checked your user page a couple or few weeks ago. I initially thought that you two were one and the same because of the "music" aspect in the names and the editing of the same topics (and I likely checked your user
386:
You are mis-reading the situation, because there is no source showing that any of the actors and/or characters are returning to the series. Especially since I also opened a sockpuppet investigation against the user, who is showcasing behaviors from a banned user, too. Plus, Chappell is currently on
482:
Just please, I ask of you, to follow the same reference format. Nothing that annoys me more is inconsistency with reference formatting! But I have no issues with anyone helping out other pages. And yeah, been developing Jordan's page for months and also on some other soap characters. I am going to
580:
Thank you for bringing this to my attention; I definitely think it's something that should be looked at and I can definitely say I will be in the next day or two (currently working the next few days, with limited online time) so I don't want to make a rash comment, you know? It definitely is an
66:
Should it be Steffy
Forrester or should I add the Spencer? I am in a edit warring with another user about this however I don't think my explanation are valid. I wanted to bring it up to her talk page but I wanted you're opinion since you are one heck of a great editor, I respect you and the
276:
That fine. I understand. But, can you at least tell me her name on facebook to look her up? If that not too much to ask, I just want to see the message. She adressed that message to the fans, therefore I think I have the right to see it. If you're answer is still no than that okay. Cheers,
483:
take your edits and re-work them, as some of the edits I feel didn't need to be made, exactly. Especially since you repeated several references that I already had within the article. And some split sections weren't needed. Characterization should be in development, etc. But it's fine.
620:
Oh stop that, flattery will get you.... everything. ;-) I'll definitely take a look at it by the end of this week and see what I can do. I think it's something that should be actually protected from IP addresses. But that's just me.
749:
page for conformation back then, in 2012), but you also seemed more grounded/more familiar with and stern about
Knowledge (XXG) rules than MusicFreak7676, and so I didn't think much on whether or not you two were one and the same.
435:
No problem. It's just beyond suspicious that these are the only edits this year has been making, without sourcing anything and exactly resemble a previous member who is now banned since they could not stop making such edits.
342:. Now, I'll be the first to admit that I know nothing about soap operas and I could be completely wrong, but at least some of those edits do not seem to be vandalism, and even if they're wrong they seem in good faith.
163:
It's fine. I just don't appreciate when people just go into a sandbox and Copy/Paste verbatim what someone else wrote. I'm mainly doing the Steffy sandbox to do a cleanup without interruptions from the main page.
740:
is because they so very much believe that Alan and Monica should be on the list? I understand that people want Alan and Monica on the list, but that source does not support them and, for years, there has been no
142:
Yes, sorry I was just going to remove it right now. Since, I had no right. I thought a note was needed as soon as possible. However, I'll make up a note myself. Sorry again! I am very sorry! Please respond....
465:
I didn't realize you were also building an article for the character. I am going to add some information to the characterization, development and reception sections. Just thought I'd give you a heads up.--
189:
Is TMZ reliable source since a user wrote that the reason why
Michael Muhney was fired from Y&R was he bullied and sexual harass Hunter King. Which I found completely unbelievable. Here's the source:
232:
Ok thanks. Also, can you link Muhney's sister facebook page because I would like to see where she debunked the rumour. I am glad it's not true however I never believed it either. —
215:
I've read it over, and I do not believe TMZ is reliable at all. It's a trash gossip site. And I wouldn't believe it. Plus, Muhney's sister debunked the rumour on her
Facebook page.
554:, what do you think I should do about it? Delete the article? Of course...I wouldn't be arguing for deletion simply because the list is not being well maintained. But if even
958:
On a side note: You usually don't have to ping me. If I leave a message on someone's talk page, I usually check back for a reply or briefly put that person's talk page on my
716:
as a supercouple. Is the reason that you did not revert that IP's entry, and have now restored it, is because you would rather Jax and Carly be on that list instead of
332:
1135:
581:
article all editors need to pay attention to or else we will be losing it. I will be putting it on my
Watchlist to make sure I can keep tabs on it.
705:
745:
brought forward to support them being on that list. The aforementioned archived source can be used to support them as a supercouple, however.
99:
comes into play, and why I hate when soaps marry characters. But I do believe her case is much like Brooke, who goes by Logan
Forrester.
191:
286:
241:
203:
152:
76:
822:
If anything, I get into soft edit-wars, with vandals and edits that aren't explained. But I try to never go against the 3RR.
544:
387:
recurring status with another series, and would not be joining the series. No publications support the claims by this user.
742:
1051:. The track listing is confirmed, the release date is confirmed, the lead single is a Top 10 hit, and the sources are
962:
to know if they have replied (unless it's a vandal or someone other unconstructive editor I've sent a warning to via
38:
793:
Oh, I see. Thanks for explaining. And you don't WP:Edit war at all anymore? Even I still get into WP:Edit wars.
696:
over this, I (after debating with myself whether or not I should) decided to come to you and ask: Why did you
1158:
1094:
1018:
902:
832:
782:
680:
631:
591:
493:
446:
397:
269:
225:
174:
133:
109:
47:
17:
959:
855:(though reverting vandalism is one of the exemptions from WP:3RR; doesn't technically count as WP:3RR).
1160:
1144:
is a five-star webzine that is creditable. Simply because it's a "blog" does not automatically deem it
1121:
1096:
1066:
1020:
979:
904:
892:
Haha, exactly. Though, I do go against if the edit if clear vandalism, etc. But only in extreme cases.
864:
834:
802:
784:
758:
693:
682:
664:
633:
608:
593:
567:
534:
495:
469:
448:
413:
399:
373:
322:
292:
271:
247:
227:
209:
176:
158:
135:
111:
96:
82:
1048:
259:
I do not feel comfortable sharing someone's personal
Facebook page without their permission. Sorry.
192:
http://www.tmz.com/2014/01/04/young-and-restless-star-fired-grobing-breast/6/#c8684066#ixzz2pRuJuxPq
1074:
737:
282:
237:
199:
148:
72:
1056:
963:
1150:
1140:
1086:
1079:
Yes, but most of its sources are for a single, not for the album. Take away that, and not enough
1010:
894:
824:
774:
672:
623:
583:
485:
438:
389:
353:
261:
217:
166:
125:
101:
967:
555:
1008:
Haha, sorry. I'm just so used to pinging people, it's kind of something you get used to, haha.
1044:
975:
860:
798:
754:
733:
660:
644:
604:
563:
532:
510:
409:
369:
318:
357:
60:
852:
339:
328:
1116:
717:
713:
361:
349:
1145:
1080:
1052:
278:
254:
233:
195:
144:
118:
90:
68:
1055:. Nothing in the content is speculative or unreliably sourced. This is not remotely a
689:
477:
466:
971:
887:
856:
817:
794:
766:
750:
729:
721:
656:
615:
600:
575:
559:
524:
430:
405:
381:
365:
314:
558:
could not care less about that list, then it's time to reconsider its importance.
725:
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
123:
Hey, can you please not steal things from my sandboxes? I would appreciate it.
1129:
1110:
724:? And could it be that the reason no one has yet reverted the IP on replacing
709:
599:
decided to simply ask you, one of the best soap opera editors we have around.
313:
to Una Foden. I had not read the common name guidelines when I made the edit.
310:
851:
LOL, all of the people who know what's best for them try to never breach
708:
of the fourth source, for that entry, and none of the sources support
933:
at about the same you mentioned going against WP:3RR for vandalism.
95:
I think she's still Steffy
Forrester Spencer. But this is where
550:
Since none of the soap opera editors have acted with regard to
25:
930:
701:
697:
652:
648:
551:
346:
647:, which recently falsified couples on the list
333:List of The Young and the Restless cast members
8:
704:? I looked at the online sources, including
702:I recently mentioned at Nk3play2's talk page
338:I saw the vandalism notice that you left on
404:Ok, I see and understand the problem now.
44:Do not edit the contents of this page.
7:
24:
509:
287:
242:
204:
153:
77:
29:
1084:the album article's creation.
545:List of fictional supercouples
1:
535:07:49, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
496:23:33, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
470:04:04, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
449:03:53, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
414:03:52, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
400:03:46, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
374:03:28, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
517:The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
323:20:36, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
293:14:18, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
272:14:13, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
248:10:23, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
228:00:43, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
210:18:18, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
177:20:11, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
159:19:44, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
136:19:35, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
112:18:18, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
83:18:10, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
1177:
1161:20:09, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
1122:19:01, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
1097:13:59, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
1067:06:44, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
1021:18:22, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
980:18:20, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
905:18:13, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
865:18:12, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
835:18:10, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
803:18:07, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
785:17:59, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
759:17:51, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
683:14:44, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
665:13:48, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
634:18:36, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
609:16:07, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
594:15:56, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
568:15:45, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
523:Hi! A barnstar for you! --
508:
348:, Brod123 adds links for
67:descisions you make. —
931:made this clarification
18:User talk:Livelikemusic
1108:the talk page rules)
1043:Tell me what part of
706:this archived version
698:revert Nk3play2's fix
42:of past discussions.
692:possibly get into a
1148:in Wiki standards.
502:A barnstar for you!
309:Sorry about moving
743:WP:Reliable source
354:Mackenzie Browning
1155:
1091:
1045:Storyline (album)
1039:Storyline (album)
1015:
899:
829:
779:
677:
628:
588:
541:
540:
529:
490:
461:Jordan Ridgeway?!
443:
394:
266:
222:
171:
130:
106:
54:
53:
48:current talk page
1168:
1154:
1151:
1133:
1119:
1115:
1113:
1090:
1087:
1081:reliable sources
1078:
1064:
1062:Ten Pound Hammer
1014:
1011:
898:
895:
891:
828:
825:
821:
778:
775:
770:
676:
673:
643:On a side note:
627:
624:
619:
587:
584:
579:
528:
525:
513:
506:
505:
489:
486:
481:
442:
439:
434:
393:
390:
385:
358:Crystal Chappell
345:For example, in
289:
265:
262:
258:
244:
221:
218:
206:
170:
167:
155:
129:
126:
122:
105:
102:
94:
79:
61:Steffy Forrester
33:
32:
26:
1176:
1175:
1171:
1170:
1169:
1167:
1166:
1165:
1152:
1127:
1117:
1111:
1109:
1105:
1088:
1072:
1060:
1041:
1012:
896:
885:
826:
815:
776:
764:
688:Before you and
674:
625:
613:
585:
573:
548:
526:
504:
487:
475:
463:
440:
428:
391:
379:
362:Phyllis Summers
350:Ashley Bashioum
336:
307:
263:
252:
219:
187:
168:
127:
116:
103:
88:
64:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1174:
1172:
1164:
1163:
1104:
1101:
1100:
1099:
1075:TenPoundHammer
1040:
1037:
1036:
1035:
1034:
1033:
1032:
1031:
1030:
1029:
1028:
1027:
1026:
1025:
1024:
1023:
993:
992:
991:
990:
989:
988:
987:
986:
985:
984:
983:
982:
945:
944:
943:
942:
941:
940:
939:
938:
937:
936:
935:
934:
916:
915:
914:
913:
912:
911:
910:
909:
908:
907:
874:
873:
872:
871:
870:
869:
868:
867:
842:
841:
840:
839:
838:
837:
808:
807:
806:
805:
788:
787:
686:
685:
641:
640:
639:
638:
637:
636:
547:
542:
539:
538:
520:
519:
514:
503:
500:
499:
498:
462:
459:
458:
457:
456:
455:
454:
453:
452:
451:
419:
418:
417:
416:
335:
326:
306:
303:
302:
301:
300:
299:
298:
297:
296:
295:
186:
183:
182:
181:
180:
179:
140:
139:
138:
63:
58:
56:
52:
51:
34:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1173:
1162:
1159:
1157:
1156:
1153:livelikemusic
1147:
1143:
1142:
1137:
1134:According to
1131:
1126:
1125:
1124:
1123:
1120:
1114:
1103:Hello (again)
1102:
1098:
1095:
1093:
1092:
1089:livelikemusic
1082:
1076:
1071:
1070:
1069:
1068:
1063:
1058:
1054:
1050:
1046:
1038:
1022:
1019:
1017:
1016:
1013:livelikemusic
1007:
1006:
1005:
1004:
1003:
1002:
1001:
1000:
999:
998:
997:
996:
995:
994:
981:
977:
973:
969:
965:
961:
957:
956:
955:
954:
953:
952:
951:
950:
949:
948:
947:
946:
932:
929:I see that I
928:
927:
926:
925:
924:
923:
922:
921:
920:
919:
918:
917:
906:
903:
901:
900:
897:livelikemusic
889:
884:
883:
882:
881:
880:
879:
878:
877:
876:
875:
866:
862:
858:
854:
850:
849:
848:
847:
846:
845:
844:
843:
836:
833:
831:
830:
827:livelikemusic
819:
814:
813:
812:
811:
810:
809:
804:
800:
796:
792:
791:
790:
789:
786:
783:
781:
780:
777:livelikemusic
768:
763:
762:
761:
760:
756:
752:
746:
744:
739:
735:
731:
727:
723:
719:
715:
711:
707:
703:
699:
695:
691:
684:
681:
679:
678:
675:livelikemusic
669:
668:
667:
666:
662:
658:
654:
650:
646:
635:
632:
630:
629:
626:livelikemusic
617:
612:
611:
610:
606:
602:
597:
596:
595:
592:
590:
589:
586:livelikemusic
577:
572:
571:
570:
569:
565:
561:
557:
553:
546:
543:
537:
536:
533:
530:
522:
521:
518:
515:
512:
507:
501:
497:
494:
492:
491:
488:livelikemusic
479:
474:
473:
472:
471:
468:
460:
450:
447:
445:
444:
441:livelikemusic
432:
427:
426:
425:
424:
423:
422:
421:
420:
415:
411:
407:
403:
402:
401:
398:
396:
395:
392:livelikemusic
383:
378:
377:
376:
375:
371:
367:
363:
359:
355:
351:
347:
343:
341:
334:
330:
327:
325:
324:
320:
316:
312:
304:
294:
290:
284:
280:
275:
274:
273:
270:
268:
267:
264:livelikemusic
256:
251:
250:
249:
245:
239:
235:
231:
230:
229:
226:
224:
223:
220:livelikemusic
214:
213:
212:
211:
207:
201:
197:
193:
184:
178:
175:
173:
172:
169:livelikemusic
162:
161:
160:
156:
150:
146:
141:
137:
134:
132:
131:
128:livelikemusic
120:
115:
114:
113:
110:
108:
107:
104:livelikemusic
98:
92:
87:
86:
85:
84:
80:
74:
70:
62:
59:
57:
49:
45:
41:
40:
35:
28:
27:
19:
1149:
1139:
1106:
1085:
1061:
1042:
1009:
960:WP:Watchlist
893:
823:
773:
747:
687:
671:
642:
622:
582:
549:
531:
516:
484:
464:
437:
388:
344:
337:
308:
260:
216:
188:
165:
124:
100:
65:
55:
43:
37:
694:WP:Edit war
36:This is an
1146:unreliable
1049:WP:CRYSTAL
331:regarding
1057:WP:HAMMER
964:WP:Huggle
311:Una Healy
305:Apologies
279:SoapFan12
255:SoapFan12
234:SoapFan12
196:SoapFan12
145:SoapFan12
119:SoapFan12
91:SoapFan12
69:SoapFan12
1141:Idolator
1053:reliable
968:WP:STiki
700:, a fix
690:Nk3play2
556:WP:SOAPS
478:Nk3play2
467:Nk3play2
288:contribs
243:contribs
205:contribs
154:contribs
97:fancruft
78:contribs
972:Flyer22
888:Flyer22
857:Flyer22
818:Flyer22
795:Flyer22
767:Flyer22
751:Flyer22
730:Tiffany
657:Flyer22
645:This IP
616:Flyer22
601:Flyer22
576:Flyer22
560:Flyer22
527:Nahnah4
431:Deville
406:Deville
382:Deville
366:Deville
315:Tomh903
39:archive
853:WP:3RR
738:Monica
340:WP:AIV
329:WP:AIV
1130:Prism
1112:Prism
718:Dante
714:Carly
360:and
16:<
1136:this
976:talk
861:talk
799:talk
755:talk
736:and
734:Alan
732:for
728:and
726:Sean
722:Lulu
720:and
712:and
661:talk
653:here
651:and
649:here
605:talk
564:talk
552:this
410:Talk
370:Talk
319:talk
283:talk
238:talk
200:talk
149:talk
73:talk
1065:•
1047:is
970:).
966:or
710:Jax
285:,
277:—
240:,
202:,
185:TMZ
151:,
143:—
75:,
1138:,
1059:.
978:)
863:)
801:)
757:)
663:)
607:)
566:)
412:)
372:)
356:,
352:,
321:)
291:)
246:)
208:)
194:—
157:)
81:)
1132::
1128:@
1118:△
1077::
1073:@
974:(
890::
886:@
859:(
820::
816:@
797:(
769::
765:@
753:(
659:(
618::
614:@
603:(
578::
574:@
562:(
480::
476:@
433::
429:@
408:(
384::
380:@
368:(
317:(
281:(
257::
253:@
236:(
198:(
147:(
121::
117:@
93::
89:@
71:(
50:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.