User talk:Looper5920/Archive 2

1646:

don't think my contributions in this area are particularly low when compared to other current nominees and recently created admins who are/were heavily supported (I have provided some details on this in the comments section of the nomination) - as I said in the comments section this is not to say "they are supported so why aren't I", rather it is just to provide a benchmark to compare how common my contribution pattern is. Secondly I would like to point out that I do not typically revert vandalism in these namespaces which I believe play a significant part in the number of these contributions for vandal-fighter editors (especially in the article talk namespace). Finally I would just like to reiterate my personal opinion that, regarding edits to Knowledge (XXG) talk, contributing and understanding are different things (i.e. I do understand the policys and guidelines even though I have not actively contributed to them). With regard to my community involvement, I do have a fair number of edits to the mian Knowledge (XXG) namespace and also the user talk namespace as previously mentioned.

2388:. Its amazing to see the differences in articles between languages. For example, so Latin-American dictators from the 20s and 30s, that Americans almost laugh at for their corruption, etc, are called national saviors and heroes in Spanish, and then go to the official government web sites. Its like they're talking about totally different people. I mean its amazing, dude. Like, in English "the corrupt dictator Jorge Gomez X died in Paris while undergoing treatment for syphllis from too much whoring and boozing" but in the Spanish article they say, "the noble savior of country X, died of a heart attack while on vacation in Paris visiting his grandmother." Its a good thing that we don't have automatic Wiki translations between languages or some of these people might declare war on the gringos for attacking the honor and dignity of their "heros," so-called! 1092: 2403:

need to have been editing for about 4-6 months, 4000+ edits, a good mix of edits on user talk pages, main article pages and in the wikipedia project pages. I have found that everyone finds there own little corner of the encyclopedia to dwell in and they are familiar with those people in those areas. Don't be to concerned with what you edit but be more concerned with the quality of those edits and the coordination with other to make sure they follow the guidelines. If you want to meet the really hard core wikipedians then vote on the RFA's, get involved with articles for deletions and other things of that sort.

2531:

Yudam-ni and led the breakout back to Hagaru-ri also relieving Capt Barber's company at the Toktong Pass. MajGen Smith is the one regarded as having saved the division because he deliberately slowed his advance despite Gen Almonds assertion to move faster and he built up his supply lines and outfitted his men with cold weather gear (even though the boots were the shoe pacs). I added the Task Force Drysdale material as part of a slow upgrade to that battle's page. There is still a lot more that needs to be added thus the Task Force part looks a bit more important than it was. Hope this makes sense.--

1650:

community in this area. Specifically I come across a lot of situations were there are very few editors on RC patrol and a lot of vandalism is being missed, this is compounded by the fact that AIAV is often not being heavily monitored during the same periods meaning that blocks are delayed and a lot of time is spent reverting vandals who have already received a final warning. This extra time spent reverting known vandals obviously mean that much new vandalism is missed - with the obvious effect on the quality and credibility of Knowledge (XXG).

1642:

interactions with other users but primarily on their user page (furthermore I have a good track record of warning vandals - something is often lacking for many vandal fighters both admin and non-admin). Regarding the duration of my contributions, I just wanted to clarify that I have now been contributing for 15 months in total and, although I have had a few "lean" months when my focus have been outside of Knowledge (XXG), I had almost 2000 contributions before February and there have been 9 months when I have made 100+ contributions.

2328:

to Nicaragua, the Corps was a pioneer in the firld of the coordination of air, naval gunfire and artillery fire. No other military organization, to this day, does it as well as the Marine Corps, and yet it is often overlooked. The whole idea of a MAGTF is built around the integration of Air, Ground and Logistic forces in order to coordinate the destruction of the enemy. I'd like to see the topics in the MC portal expanded to include

2343:

different approach, the reserve augmentation element such as the 2nd MACE at Camp Lejeune. These units, by definition are totally embedded in active duty command elements. They train and work to be able to fall right in on that supported unit so it can deploy with enough bodies to go 24/7. I was in 2nd MACE and it was like no typical reserve USMC unit I ever saw. It was operationally totally integrated into the II MEF HQ.

201: 1534: 2357:

articles we have and really delve into the finer points such as fire support coordination, expand all the major USMC battles and what look at what makes a MAGTF tick. I firmly believe that no other military organization on wikipedia is as comprehensively and uniformly covered as the USMC and we still have tons of work to do. The way it is working now is that I do units, bases, etc and

2208: 903: 841: 798: 84: 2264: 1037: 1789: 1747: 1512:), I know that there is always an opportunity to request adminship again. In the meantime, I will do my best to address your concerns in the hope that when the opportunity for adminship arises once again, you will reconsider your position. If at any time I make any mistakes or if you would like to comment on my contributions to Knowledge (XXG), you are more than 1638:. The main reason that I ask this is because there has previously been some confusion as to my talk count and I also wonder if there might have been some confusion regarding the duration of my contributions. I would also like to comment on some of the concerns raised by others, which I have discussed on the nomination page, but which you may not be aware of. 2439: 1190: 1551:. I’m proud to inform you that it passed with 75 support to 1 oppose to 2 neutral. I promise to make some great edits in the future (with edit summaries!) and use these powers to do all that I can to help. After all, that’s what I’m here for! (You didn’t think I could send a thank you note without a bad joke, could I?) -- 1012:, which passed successfully 49/6/3. I am grateful for your comments, and have taken people's suggestions to heart. I will do my best to live up to people's expectations. If I can ever make any improvements or help out in any way, please feel free to let me know! Although you voted oppose I appreciate your remarks. 2689:

I'm back for now but I am still in limited duty status for awhile. I will help out with the portal where I can and continue creating articles for Marine Corps units. I think between you with the personnel and myself on the units we have begun a pretty comprehensive and uniform Marine Corps section.

2408:

As for the Spanish and other language pages I cannot speak to those. I cheated my way through high school spanish and used to pay off the dishwashers where I worked to do my homework. However in light of all we know about market economics today and the fact that Latin America is voting in socialist

2327:

I have some thoughts about this and I'd like to share them with you. I was an arty officer in the USMC. You know, I think a sadly missed element of discussions about the Corps is its unique ability in Combined Arms Operations and the related area of Fire Support Coordination. Going all the way back

763:

The reason for the revert is that anon blanked the entire page with out talking about it and I know that I have added terms to this page without referencing the site given. I am not ignoring it but I will admit that it is not high on my list of things to do right now. Having glanced aroung the page

140:

I saw that you were fixing up the old ones. I have been following your edits and making a few changes as well. Going back is the right way to do it but it is a long monotonous process. I'll help out where I can but I am still concentrating on active units for the most part. Every once in awhile I

877:

It's not hard at all. go to www.mirc.co.uk (I think that's the address) and download mirc. Once you open it up, the server is irc.freenode.net (or if you scroll through the list of pre-configured servers, it should be in there as Random Freenode Server). Once you've connected to the server, you type

2402:

you will see where alot of them have laid out their criteria for a support vote. Many of the voters are very thourough and will go back over every edit you have ever made so be sure that you are always following the guidelines. I would say if you want to have a solid chance at getting support you

2342:

On another topic. I was also in the reserves and I think it would be a good idea to explain the types of reserve components including the IRR, SMCR, etc. Also the difference between reserve units that drill as separate organizational elements, company, battalion, squadron, as well as a the totally

1292:

Welcome to the inaugural issue of the Military history WikiProject's newsletter! We hope that this new format will help members—especially those who may be unable to keep up with some of the rapid developments that tend to occur—find new groups and programs within the project that they may wish to

1645:

WIth regards to the concerns raised by other, which aren't covered by the above, they seem to relate primarily to my lack of contributions to the article talk and wikipedia talk namespaces and what this says about my community involvement and exposure to process. Firstly I would like to say that I

1170:

I added the category USMC generals to articles about commandants because not all commandants have been flag officers. Do you think it's unnecessary to have both categories? However it's done is cool with me, as long as it's consistent. I did notice there were some articles for commandants that had

2660:

Welcome back! I note that you've been back to your high level of activity. I tried to keep regular rotation in the various sections while you were out.... I just changed out the picture (to Battle of Belleau Wood). You inquired once on how many Marine Corps Medal of Honor recipients there were

2375:

Clan in particular, greatly expanding the scope, photos and all on all the pricipal players. Hey, maybe I'm just looking for a wikipedia cutting score - :) I have absolutely NO idea about this Knowledge (XXG) heirarchy or how one "moves up" in the organization. All I DO know is that I've spent

2169:

The Marines no longer run any detention facilities at Talil. That was something created just after the invasion and lasted till around September/October 03. The Marines are now responsible for western Iraq and thus no USMC units are running jail facilities and the USAF base at Talil in southern

371:

or something similiar. In there have infobox examples of Individuals, Units and bases/stations, etc... Also maybe have a notes section which lists some general guidelines for section standardization, picture sizes, etc.... Pretty basic stuff but enough to steer someone that wants to help in the

2530:

Of all the Marine regiments that fought at the Chosin (1,5,7) Puller's 1st Marines played the least significant role. While 3/1 did move up to the Hagaru-ri the rest of the regiment stayed well south and only saw about 2 days of heavy fighting. Meanwhile 5th & 7th Marines slugged it out at

2356:

I agree that the USMC articles need to be much more comprehensive but that is a little down the road for me. My plan is to start a page for every active duty battalion and major organization, base, individual, etc... Once we have the grunt work out of the way then we should start to expand the

779:

Thanks for the congrats. I don't feel guilty about a thing. I was treated better over there than I was since I've returned but that's a totally seperate issue that's way beyond me to deal with. I should be thanking you for bringing the Corps all that recognition and reference on Knowledge (XXG).

495:

From what I read in the official USMC bio, Colonel Fox had not command assignments at the Battalion level or above. Starting out as a private, he served in a number of roles, including drill instructor and recruiter ... are you set on having the medals in the info box stop at the Purple Heart?

1641:

Firstly with regard to my talk contributions and the duration of my contributions. I just wanted to clarify that I do have substantial numbers of contributions in the user talk namespace although significantly less in the main article and wikipedia talk namespace, so I do have a good history of

260:

I can't remember where I first saw this stub being used. It wasn't apparent to me then that it was only for US military units. I thought it could also be used for US-military procedures. Those guys were all subjected to the detention without habeas corpus aspect of the Bush/Rumsfeld detainee

156:

Hi Looper buddy, how you doing? Thank you for dividing the article into sections. I admire your work on the Corps very much. I only have one small request. I like keeping the military articles that I write in uniform and therefore I would prefer the box which I originally had instead of the

2449:. I really didn't think people appreciate my work here that much, but it's nice to see you do: my Request was closed with 66 supports and 4 opposes. I'll do my best not to turn your confidence down. If in any point in the future you get the feeling I'm doing something wrong, do not hesitate to 727:. I understand that my last 6000+ edits were not sufficient to convince you that edits like some of my early ones would never be repeated again, but I sincerely hope that at some point I would be able to convince you of my transformation. Looking forward to working with you in future. Regards, 1649:

I understand that contacting you in this way may well be considered "campaigning" but I want to assure you that I am driven by good practical intentions rather than ego. As you will be aware, I am primarily a vandal fighter and I feel that the admin tools will allow me to far better serve the

866:

Yeah, I'm just being lazy on that one. It should be pretty straight forward but I have been putting it off. I'll give you a heads up when I do create it. It should be pretty shortly here. On another note, I have been thinking about doing the IRC thing. Is it a pain in the ass to set up?

2699:

Separate categories for MOH recipients? Probably a good idea. Isn't a good cutoff number about 60? Since the Marine Corps has 294 recipients, that would work. There are already well over 60 USMC MOH articles. Is this something that can be done "boldly", or is there a process to follow?

985:

recently closed and it was a success, passing at 84-02-00. I would like to thank you for taking the time to weigh in and on your subsequent support, despite not meeting your admin standards yet. And I know it's quite cliche, but if you ever need any assistance and/or want another opinion on

167:

I asked you as a favor. This not a "Puerto Rican Thing" as you make it sound. I was clear when I stated that I have written many military articles and that I only requested to keep that section as is. It's my personal style and tribute. This sould not be turned into a big issue.

227:

I'm forging ahead trying to get all the current articles on USMC MOH recipients completed with infoboxes and portal links. I've made it through the first page; now on the "S". When the rest are complete, I'll take a break and then begin working on missing USMC MOH recipients.

2591:

I see you're back ... or at least started editing again. Would you like to change out the portal picture ... see Coordination ... how about the Tun Tavern picture? At the moment, my brain is devoid of creative words to include with the picture, so, I'd like to leave it to you.

1051:

an thus only 73% support votes, resulting in that the nomination failed. As many of you commenting that I have to few main-space edits, I'll try to better my self on that part. If you have any ideas on what kind of articles I could edit, pleas send me a line. :)

2376:

THOUSANDs of hours at something that has become quite addictive - as in sleep deprivation, etc. I also have edit in Spanish and Latin. I'm working on Russian reading, but I'm only begun that particular project. I'm reading an article on the Russian diplomat

1893:. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Knowledge (XXG)'s policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate 2189:

from prod/speedy deletion. I tried to get it up to the standards and style that you make your USMC regiments and aviation group entries. Let me know how it looks. It was really bad off, took me around 50 edits to fix. I'm sure there's still mistakes.

474:

Need to clean up the commands portion of the infobox before that. For Officers I belive that the commands should begin at the Battalion level unless circumstances require otherwise. We need to clean up the infobox then I think we should throw it up

514:

Thank you for the offer. I will try to correct obvious mistakes if I see any. Unfortunately I am on active duty currently, training to become a commissioned Marine officer, so as you can guess I am short on time. Good luck and Semper Fi.

355:

box? It might lead to the "featured" article. Do you think it would help to develop "standard" formats/information for each type of article before putting articles out for collaboration? For example, medals in order of precedence.

547:. I had to revert back to an edit before that pasting, so some of edits of your and others were lost. You might want to look it over and see if anything needs fixing. Thanks for your contributions to Knowledge (XXG). Cheers, - 484:

Agree ... I'm signing out right now, so won't have time to clean it up. I'll check back tonight to see if you posted it or it still needs the work done. BTW, I am still working the missing mOH articles. Only on the "B"s.

2486:

I notice that you changed the reference on the portal picture to Smith from Puller. Though Smith was the commanding general of the 1st Marine Division, he ordered Puller to Chosin to help — (task force included 3/1). See

2630: 780:

While I'm not a marine, I was attached to 1st MEF, so I consider myself honorary, so have a joint service oohrah from me. ;) The real congrats should come when I hit my 1000th article edit (I'm in the 880's right now).

1250: 1171:

the USMC general category but not the commandant category, and vice-versa, which is why I started working on them. My area of "expertise" is the army, not the Corps, so I try not to mess with those articles too much.

313:

Don't really know how many. I'm going from the USMC MOH page and checking in alphabetical order. I don't think I want to know how many... I'll go from A to Z. If you would like, you can start with Z and go back.

366:

Good call on Foss. I was just looking at that yesterday and it is pretty well put together. Agree on the standardized formats. We should crate a link on the main page under Standardized Formats then link it to

822:

I see Task force Tarawa is on your things to do. Get with me somehow on IRC, or AIM, or through here, and I can get you some additional references, and some of my pictures if you'd like (I was part of TF Tarawa).

1615:. I am very humbled by your vote and grateful. Please let me know if at any stage you require assistance, or if you have comments on how I am doing as an administrator. Once again thank you and with kind regards 1573:

Noticed today that the articles of the Sergeant Majors of the Marine Corps have not been "standardized" with infoboxes and USMC portal links. I've done the first three today, but will be taking a break for RL.

2409:

governments again I think they prefer to live amongst there own delusions. Change the articles you can and little by little the project will improve. Hope this helps and am interested to hear your thoughts.--

2158:

where you changed the tense. Could you please clarify whether you meant that the Marines had withdrawn from this compound, or merely that the individual Marines charged with the abuse had left? Thanks. --

1120:. I have been thinking about cleaning up that section of the article though. Do you have any ideas of how much description of current events (like the basketball game) should be kept in there? Thanks again. -- 1802:. I want to let you know that I will do my best to address all concerns that were raised during the RfA. I will also do my very best live up to this new responsibility and to serve the community, but please 1256: 1224:

has been created for the benefit of the project. A number of articles have already been reviewed, receiving significantly more feedback within the project than they did on the generic peer review page.

2520:

Though, reading the info on the Drysdale task force in the article makes it unclear what role was played by Puller. Using the Defense Link article as a source, seems like Puller's role was pivotal. —

1965:

I also updated the Quote. If you have any ideas about persons, topics, tone, etc. for the quote, I'd appreciate the input. I have a few more ideas lined up, but welcome hearing your favorites. —

557:

If you can find a public domain version then that's great. However that text had some POV problems too, as someone mentioned on the talk page. If it is returned it'll need some editing. Cheers, -

1980:

No problem, i saw that the new stub got through so i thought i should help. There is a lot of page, in the future we could divide the stubs up into ARMY, NAVY and Air like the US ones. Regards

2621:

Just a thanks Looper5920 for fixing up Cpt Brent Morel Navy Cross page. Really appreciated. wish I knew enought about this stuff to help you aout.. taing care of Jarheads.. Thanks Swump---

966:

Hadn't thought about it yet. I'll roll with Ira Hayes. Need an enlisted guy plus there is more to his story than the typical military bio. Give me a little time on the featured article. --

2710:

For categories I would say do it boldly. 60 is usually the number for stubs. Not sure what the criteria is for cats but they tend to be more flexible since you are not creating a template.--

1700: 281:? The article survived my nom for RFD, but has had no improvement since then. Wood was never court martialed and I have concerns that this article is still not a NPOV biography. Thank you 656:

category (intended to be the corresponding permanent category, where that exists), not for the name of the stub category itself, as that then introduces a category self-inclusion "loop".

878:"/join #wikipedia" (without quotes) to join that channel, although there's not much useful material that comes through there. More useful is "/join #wikipedia-en", which is much better. 2690:

It will be nice to do some deeper research once all of the grunt work is done. One more thing. Have you considered breaking the MOH recipients category into individual services?? --

387:

Only thing I couldn't find on Foss was the end date of service for the South Dakota Air National Guard. I checked the SD ANG website history and it didn't have that level of detail. —

1229: 1091: 2056:

There could be a heading for each area - Selected article, Did you know, etc. - on the same page. It would be a handier, one-stop reference, versus having one for each section. —

2765:

I think that is the way to go. When cats are abbreviated they eventually always get spelled out and it is a royal pain in the but to move large categories. Go with the above.--

2361:

does individuals (Generals, MOH winners). The reserves are definitely a little undercovered but we have been improving that as of late and can use all of the help we can get.--

1274: 1265: 1220: 529:

If I was at TBS then I would be already commissioned. And no, I am not at OCS. I don't get commissioned for another 2 years 2 months. USNA Class of 2008. Go Navy, Beat Army! --

1296:

Please consider this inital issue to be a prototype; as always, any comments and suggestions are quite welcome, and will help us improve the newsletter in the coming months.

2220: 915: 853: 810: 96: 619:. To those of you concerned about the fact that I am a relative newcomer, I encourage you to poke me with a sharp stick if I make a mistake. Or better yet, let me know on 1806:

if I make any mistakes or if you have any feedback at all on my actions. Finally, if there is anything that I can assist you with - please don't hesitate to ask. Cheers

1897:, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well. 1329:

are currently being discussed. A number of issues have already been resolved, but the proposed scheme is still in draft form and further input would be very welcome.

2733: 2633:

of the project newsletter is now out. You may read this issue or change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you by following the link. Thanks.

1653:

I would like to sum by saying that I feel I could make good use of the tools and that I have never done anything to raise concerns that I would misuse them. Cheers

1994:

Do you have plans for changing the "selected article"? Have a list lined up? Perhaps starting a Portal/Coordination page so we can queue up ideas as they arise?

1675: 982: 2103:. If you ever have problems that you could use my assistance with or see me doing stupid things with my new buttons, don't hesitate to contact me. Happy editing, 1585:

Finished adding infoboxes & portal links to existing articles. There were a number missing; down to 4 remaining. I'll finish these in the next day or so. —

1795: 1635: 1548: 1325: 1009: 724: 2399: 2279: 345:

for the next one? What criteria? Who judges? Since you created the portal and are doing the vast majority of the updating, you are the de facto "committee".

1445:

CWO2 Thomas does not have an article in the official USMC bios. Except for Knowledge (XXG) and mirrors, a Gsearch does not reveal any information; therefore

2748: 2446: 1505: 1099: 1862:

page on Home of Heroes. It says that he served and received the MoHs under two different names. MedalofHonor.com also has the same information on their

1858:, WWI Army & Navy Medals of Honor recipient. The information on the Who's Who Marine Corps site was brief. In doing some Internet searching, I found 1753: 1143: 207: 2282:! It passed with a final tally of 91/3/5. I am quite humbled and pleased by the community's show of confidence in me. If you need help or just want to 254:. I will start using that instead of {{US-mil-stub}}. I'll change the instances of {{US-mil-stub}} to that category, over the next little while. 2100: 1725: 1286: 1245: 1198: 2743: 2738: 1516:. Regardless of your religious, cultural, and personal beliefs, I pray that whatever and whoever motivates you in life continues to guide you on 2570: 1920: 352: 157:

military info box. I hope that you understand that it is only a question of personal style. Keep up the good work soldier. Semper Fi,

32: 2603:

I'm not quite back yet. I am killing time at work during a conference. I will be back in a few more days for good. I'll have a look--

2371:

PS - What's the deal about RFAs and becoming editors and admins, etc. I've written extensively but mostly on historical figures and the

1117: 2471:

insignia image — replacing the one from military-graphics.com (]) with one from USMC The new one also includes "Oldest, Proudest". —

2507: 1890: 231:

On order of decorations ... I think in order of precedence would be best. Easier than trying to distinguish chronological order. —

2093: 1909: 1668: 1135: 39: 1606: 2211: 906: 844: 801: 544: 87: 1102:. I withdrew due to certain controversies, but I appreciated your vote and hope to see you here in the future. Thanks again. -- 463:? The article could probably use some expansion; but, perhaps putting it in the Bio box might lead to some additional edits. — 368: 675:

You're welcome. As creator of the parent (stub) category, I can't help but taking a feeble sort of vicarious pride... :)

2642: 2186: 1832: 1760:. I hope I can perform at the standards expected for administrators. If I make any mistakes, or you need anything, please 642:

Nice job on these, and looks like they all turned out decently-sized, too. One small point: the "category" parameter on

295:

Done with updating all of the current articles on USMC Medal of Honor recipients. Starting creating the rest. Began with

1904: 1729: 1146:

which passed with a tally of (93/1/2). If you need any help or wish discuss something with me, you are always welcome to

2549: 754: 2573:

on adopting a non-specifications summary infobox for aircraft articles. Your comments would be appreciated. Thanks! -

2552:

inspired by your Marine portal, i was wondering if you would have a look and suggest were i could improve it. Regards

126:

BTW. Before starting on new USMC MOH recipients, I'm looking existing articles to update with infobox and portal. —

1611:

Hello Looper5920, how are you? Thanks for your support in my RFA. The final vote count was (88/3/1), so I am now an

2637: 2492: 1827: 1302: 2120:

OK. Go to ]. Feel free to change format. You'll see I've split it into the topics by left and right columns.

1612: 431:, now out of "working" stage and "published", is neutral. See discussion page for consensus on keeping it NPOV. — 1238: 117: 2290: 1696: 1688: 751: 428: 45:

Thanks for voting on my RFA and helping me become an admin. The final tally was 108-0-1 (putting me on the

646: 1870:

has even different information about his name. The two separate names was confirmed by the Navy page on

1062: 2398:

As for Adminship there about a hundred or so individuals who regularly vote on the RFA's. If you go to

1859: 1513: 987: 530: 516: 282: 138: 2241:

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Village_pump_(policy)#Guidelines_for_Wikipedia_lists_of_ethnic_groups

56: 2066:

Is this idea OK with you? If so, I can create /Coordination page and appropriate section headings. —

750:

by an anon, but did you check out the copyvio claim? It doesn't seem appropriate simply to ignore it.

2196: 1803: 1555: 1172: 891: 829: 786: 732: 72: 17: 2381: 1867: 1278:

is looking for volunteers to help with translating featured articles from other-language Wikipedias.

2647: 2634: 2488: 2283: 1837: 1824: 1523: 1403: 1396: 1354: 1307: 1299: 296: 2495:. I was trying to indicate the on-the-ground work of Chesty Puller. Comments? Better wording? — 211: 2372: 1958: 1449: 1430: 1382: 1369: 882: 693:

Sorry...THought I was making it right. I suck at templates. Anyway I could ask you to fix it?--

417:

I've put 3/1 on my watch list. WikiNews (I don't often cross over there) has a neutral brief. —

606: 932:

What are your plans for updating the USMC portal featured article and the featured biography?

2450: 2033:

The Portal coordination page sounds like a good idea. Which section do we base it off from?--

1772: 1761: 1375: 1157: 1147: 1072: 1047:

Thank you for supporting/opposing/commenting on my request of adminship, sadly the result was

990:

page. Thanks again and maybe I can be the first "person who drinks Pepsi" that you can trust.

585: 178: 169: 158: 1634:

Hi. I am sorry to bother you but I wondered if you might be prepared to take another look at

177:

Thanks and no hard feelings. We are after all the mean, lean fighting machines. Semper Fi,

2678:

There are additional earlier and interim recipients. I'm concentrating on these four wars. —

2577: 2110: 1950: 1855: 1847: 1718: 1679: 1436: 1160: 991: 627: 620: 558: 548: 53: 1894: 46: 2766: 2711: 2691: 2604: 2532: 2410: 2362: 2191: 2171: 2107: 2074: 2034: 1807: 1654: 1616: 1560: 1552: 1459: 1014: 967: 944: 886: 868: 824: 781: 765: 728: 694: 667: 476: 373: 142: 67: 49:

list). I hope to do my best in upholding the integrity of Knowledge (XXG). Thanks again,

2314: 2295: 2287: 2240: 1916: 1234: 224:

I made the change of quote today for the portal. (Feel free to edit the intro words).

2769: 2759: 2714: 2705: 2694: 2683: 2650: 2607: 2597: 2581: 2556: 2535: 2525: 2515: 2500: 2476: 2457: 2428: 2413: 2392: 2365: 2350: 2317: 2249: 2227: 2174: 2163: 2141: 2128: 2077: 2061: 2051: 2037: 2025: 1984: 1970: 1939: 1924: 1879: 1840: 1810: 1774: 1736: 1708: 1682: 1657: 1621: 1590: 1579: 1563: 1526: 1487: 1473: 1342: 1175: 1124: 1106: 1021: 994: 970: 960: 922: 871: 860: 817: 768: 757: 736: 706: 697: 688: 679: 670: 660: 632: 596: 561: 551: 533: 519: 501: 490: 479: 468: 446: 436: 422: 402: 392: 376: 361: 319: 304: 285: 265: 236: 214: 181: 172: 161: 145: 131: 103: 2553: 2389: 2377: 2347: 2246: 2160: 1981: 1103: 569: 460: 262: 2046:

Not sure. Could we have an "sandbox" section — ] for those working on the portal? —

1728:

robot thanks you for your handiwork, and excuses himself while he practices his new

2755: 2701: 2679: 2593: 2521: 2511: 2496: 2472: 2454: 2358: 2137: 2124: 2067: 2057: 2047: 2021: 1966: 1935: 1875: 1765: 1704: 1586: 1575: 1483: 1469: 1424: 1151: 1067: 1057: 956: 593: 497: 486: 464: 442: 432: 418: 398: 388: 357: 315: 300: 278: 271: 232: 127: 200: 31: 1871: 1678:. The final result was a successful request based on 111 support and 1 oppose. -- 310:

Sounds good, I'll help where I can. About how many still need to be completed??

210:

which passed 91/0/0. If you ever need anything, feel free to leave me a message!

2574: 2468: 2425: 2424:

Many thanks for your support on my recent RfA. It was successful. Thanks again,

2385: 1533: 1465:). Even if verifiable, though accomplished, I'm not convinced of notability. 939: 624: 50: 2263: 1863: 1413:— first female Marine selected for Naval aviation training; CH-53E pilot (1995) 2571:

Knowledge (XXG) talk:WikiProject Aircraft#Infobox Aicraft consensus discussion

2207: 2104: 1733: 1410: 1339: 1121: 902: 840: 797: 261:

policy. I thought this was sufficient justification to apply this stub. --

83: 702:

No problem, done. Just making sure we weren't subliminally revert-warring!

2380:

who was one of the key people in the negotiations and treaty that ended the

1357:

for AfD. There are very few articles on female Marines (I found only one),

949: 703: 685: 676: 657: 277:

If you have a moment, would you please take a look at my recent comments on

2123:

Please leave your thoughts/suggestions for updates in your absence/break. —

1788: 1746: 1717: 441:

The talk page showed a concerted attempt to be neutral ... no edit wars. —

1934:

Thanks for your recommendation for a Military History WikiProject award. —

1116:

Hey Looper, thanks for catching and reverting that change on the page for

615:

Thank you for voting on my RfA. It passed with a consensus to promote of

581: 342: 1098:

Hey Looper, I'd really like thank you for taking the time to vote at my

1036: 2092: 1667: 1134: 543:

An editor dumped a large amount of copied text into our article on the

38: 2438: 2099:

Hello, Looper5920! Thank you for your support in my recent successful

1605: 605: 764:

I am not sure that they didn't lift the info from Knowledge (XXG).--

66:

Posted my help on the project you sent me. thanks for the heads up.

1189: 986:

something, grab a Pepsi and don't hesitate to drop me a line on my

1406:— the first female Marine ordered to a combat zone (1967, Vietnam) 1133: 589: 113:

I agree ... it would be great to have a specific stub. How about

885:

as per your request in the military task force WP. Check it out.

2215: 1502:

Looper5920/Archive 2, thank you for your constructive opposition

1399:, USMCR — first woman awarded the Navy-Marine Corps Medal (1953) 910: 848: 805: 91: 2508:

Portal:United_States_Marine_Corps/Coordination#Selected_picture

2384:

war. Also, I started an article on his fellow diplomat, Count

2136:

Check out the coordination page for ideas, suggestions, etc. —

1900:

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

1885:

Image copyright problem with Image:Var_behindscenes_hist_04.gif

1874:. Interestingly, there is no mention of this in his USMC bio. — 324: 2278:

Hello Looper5920/Archive 2. Thank you for your support in my

1353:

I've thought a bit about your question concerning nominating

2437: 2262: 2091: 1794:

Hi Looper5920. Just a quick note to thank you for voting on

1666: 1508:. Although it did not succeed as no consensus was declared ( 1188: 1090: 199: 37: 30: 1752:

Hello Looper5920/Archive 2: Thank you for supporting me in

2754:

Or do you think it should be USMC, USN, USArmy, USAF? —

1142:

Hi Looper5920/Archive 2, thank you for supporting me in

723:

Hi Looper5920, and thank you for taking time to vote on

2661:

left ot create articles for. Marine Corps recipients:

2311:...I also agree with Petros in regards to type of edits 2155: 747: 2233:

Guidelines for Knowledge (XXG) lists of ethnic groups

1269:

for use in military history articles is now underway.

584:

to you on my completion of one year as a wikipedian.

2625:Military history WikiProject Newsletter - Issue II 684:Though... why did you change the USMC one back? 2313:". I assume you meant to say agree with Proto :) 137:Check out my proposal on the stub. Just made it 1181:Military history WikiProject Newsletter, Issue I 2734:Category:Marine Corps Medal of Honor recipients 1919:. For assistance on the image use policy, see 2493:Battle_of_Chosin_Reservoir#Task_Force_Drysdale 1695:You might be interested that the stub article 588:, we shall have a party tonight. The biggest 141:update Army pages just to break it up a bit.-- 2245:Your contributions would be very welcome. -- 1420:Articles existing on notable female Marines: 8: 2749:Category:Air Force Medal of Honor recipients 2346:Thanks and let me know what you think. S/F 1365:Missing articles on notable female Marines: 1326:guidelines for categories of military people 1961:, 1st Director of Women Marines (1948-1953) 1953:. Please feel free to edit the lead-in. 1433:, 1st Director of Women Marines (1948-1953) 123:? I'd like to see the USMC in all caps. 1187: 369:Portal:United States Marine Corps/Formats 2170:iraq. Sorry for not claritying further-- 1921:Knowledge (XXG):Image legality questions 2744:Category:Army Medal of Honor recipients 2739:Category:Navy Medal of Honor recipients 1385:, Director of Women Marines (1969-1973) 1378:, Director of Women Marines (1964-1969) 1674:Thank you for your support vote on my 1282: 291:Marine Corps Medal of Honor recipients 2197: 1756:, which passed with a final tally of 892: 830: 787: 257:I didn't mean to screw up your stub. 206:Thanks for your recent support on my 73: 7: 2237:Please may I draw your attention to 1910:Knowledge (XXG):Image copyright tags 1482:- with the above missing articles. — 246:Someone recently created a category 2569:There is a consensus discussion on 881:I've done a major restructuring of 372:right direction from the get go. -- 2016:? What resource(s) are you using? 1891:Image:Var_behindscenes_hist_04.gif 1569:Sergeant Major of the Marine Corps 1251:warfare during classical antiquity 325:Marines Awarded the Medal of Honor 24: 2201: 1455:and at this point, unverifiable ( 896: 834: 791: 623:, and I'll do my best to fix it. 77: 2206: 1905:Knowledge (XXG):Image use policy 1787: 1783: 1745: 1741: 1604: 1600: 1532: 1035: 901: 839: 796: 545:Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton 82: 2643: 2309:Just to let you know you said " 1990:Suggestions for portal updates? 1915:This is an automated notice by 1833: 2548:Hey Looper i just created the 1949:I updated the Portal bio with 1392:Other notable female Marines: 1266:catalogue of high-quality maps 1233:got off to a great start with 1230:Collaboration of the Fortnight 666:Thanks for cleaning them up.-- 26: 1: 2638: 2291: 2277: 2271: 2198: 2187:Commander Mine Squadron SEVEN 1828: 1303: 1015: 893: 831: 788: 74: 2550:Military of Australia portal 2544:Portal:Military of Australia 2510:for suggested new wording. — 2445:Thanks for supporting me in 2332:Marine Air Ground Task Force 1221:military history peer review 1199:Military history WikiProject 2192: 1957:Idea for next bio: Colonel 1237:and is now focusing on the 1079:09:39, 27 March 2006 (UTC) 887: 825: 782: 351:Good idea -- put it in the 196:Thanks Looper5920/Archive 2 68: 2786: 2668:World War II: 82 - 22 left 2665:World War I: 8 - completed 2651:18:46, 30 April 2006 (UTC) 2608:00:55, 28 April 2006 (UTC) 2598:00:46, 28 April 2006 (UTC) 2582:18:36, 24 April 2006 (UTC) 2557:10:11, 22 April 2006 (UTC) 2536:00:41, 17 April 2006 (UTC) 2526:21:40, 16 April 2006 (UTC) 2516:21:37, 16 April 2006 (UTC) 2501:21:33, 16 April 2006 (UTC) 2482:Battle of Chosin Reservoir 2477:13:40, 15 April 2006 (UTC) 2458:11:55, 13 April 2006 (UTC) 2429:10:52, 13 April 2006 (UTC) 2414:09:28, 13 April 2006 (UTC) 2393:02:50, 13 April 2006 (UTC) 2366:09:16, 13 April 2006 (UTC) 2351:02:45, 13 April 2006 (UTC) 2338:Fire Support Coordination. 2318:13:06, 12 April 2006 (UTC) 2286:, let me know. Cheers! -- 2250:11:57, 11 April 2006 (UTC) 2228:17:56, 10 April 2006 (UTC) 2175:19:37, 10 April 2006 (UTC) 2164:15:17, 10 April 2006 (UTC) 2142:03:18, 10 April 2006 (UTC) 1850:, Medal of Honor recipient 1732:. Back in action soon! -- 1474:23:34, 30 March 2006 (UTC) 1343:05:01, 30 March 2006 (UTC) 1315: 1210: 1176:00:03, 30 March 2006 (UTC) 1161:11:48, 29 March 2006 (UTC) 1125:23:46, 28 March 2006 (UTC) 1107:05:09, 28 March 2006 (UTC) 1022:06:07, 27 March 2006 (UTC) 995:04:52, 27 March 2006 (UTC) 971:19:21, 26 March 2006 (UTC) 961:16:47, 26 March 2006 (UTC) 923:04:43, 29 March 2006 (UTC) 872:10:19, 26 March 2006 (UTC) 861:10:12, 26 March 2006 (UTC) 818:10:07, 26 March 2006 (UTC) 769:05:15, 26 March 2006 (UTC) 758:04:59, 26 March 2006 (UTC) 737:03:20, 26 March 2006 (UTC) 707:22:36, 25 March 2006 (UTC) 698:22:25, 25 March 2006 (UTC) 689:22:23, 25 March 2006 (UTC) 680:22:02, 25 March 2006 (UTC) 671:22:00, 25 March 2006 (UTC) 661:21:55, 25 March 2006 (UTC) 633:05:18, 25 March 2006 (UTC) 597:15:20, 24 March 2006 (UTC) 562:20:54, 23 March 2006 (UTC) 552:20:40, 23 March 2006 (UTC) 534:03:54, 23 March 2006 (UTC) 520:03:23, 23 March 2006 (UTC) 502:02:57, 23 March 2006 (UTC) 491:13:08, 22 March 2006 (UTC) 480:13:04, 22 March 2006 (UTC) 469:13:00, 22 March 2006 (UTC) 447:13:01, 22 March 2006 (UTC) 437:11:39, 22 March 2006 (UTC) 423:00:00, 22 March 2006 (UTC) 403:05:28, 21 March 2006 (UTC) 397:Finally found it - 1975. — 393:04:58, 21 March 2006 (UTC) 377:04:17, 21 March 2006 (UTC) 362:04:00, 21 March 2006 (UTC) 320:03:37, 21 March 2006 (UTC) 305:02:22, 21 March 2006 (UTC) 286:14:06, 20 March 2006 (UTC) 266:09:30, 20 March 2006 (UTC) 237:03:27, 20 March 2006 (UTC) 220:USMC portal & articles 215:05:39, 19 March 2006 (UTC) 182:07:33, 19 March 2006 (UTC) 173:05:49, 19 March 2006 (UTC) 162:04:57, 19 March 2006 (UTC) 146:03:23, 19 March 2006 (UTC) 132:03:18, 19 March 2006 (UTC) 104:21:55, 17 March 2006 (UTC) 57:13:25, 17 March 2006 (UTC) 2725:Category names - opinion? 2674:Vietnam War: 57 - 29 left 2129:03:48, 8 April 2006 (UTC) 2111:02:29, 8 April 2006 (UTC) 2078:01:18, 8 April 2006 (UTC) 2062:16:32, 7 April 2006 (UTC) 2052:16:31, 7 April 2006 (UTC) 2038:14:37, 7 April 2006 (UTC) 2026:13:47, 7 April 2006 (UTC) 1985:09:59, 7 April 2006 (UTC) 1971:16:08, 6 April 2006 (UTC) 1940:00:01, 6 April 2006 (UTC) 1925:13:04, 5 April 2006 (UTC) 1880:05:04, 5 April 2006 (UTC) 1841:23:09, 4 April 2006 (UTC) 1811:04:04, 4 April 2006 (UTC) 1775:01:19, 4 April 2006 (UTC) 1737:10:30, 5 April 2006 (UTC) 1709:01:15, 4 April 2006 (UTC) 1683:13:24, 3 April 2006 (UTC) 1658:20:51, 2 April 2006 (UTC) 1622:17:23, 2 April 2006 (UTC) 1591:04:10, 3 April 2006 (UTC) 1580:15:37, 2 April 2006 (UTC) 1564:12:20, 1 April 2006 (UTC) 1547:Thank you for supporting 1527:05:23, 1 April 2006 (UTC) 1488:07:14, 2 April 2006 (UTC) 1239:military history of Spain 1041: 1034: 333:To Do list for the Portal 2671:Korean War: 42 - 26 left 2335:Combined Arms Operations 2116:USMC Portal coordination 1854:I created an article on 1798:, which recently passed 1359:which should be remedied 252:Guantanamo Bay detainees 2770:01:32, 9 May 2006 (UTC) 2760:01:20, 9 May 2006 (UTC) 2715:11:38, 8 May 2006 (UTC) 2706:11:31, 8 May 2006 (UTC) 2695:10:37, 8 May 2006 (UTC) 2684:00:52, 7 May 2006 (UTC) 2656:USMC Portal maintenance 1697:Operation Iraqi Freedom 1689:Operation Iraqi Freedom 1518:the most righteous path 935:Biography suggestions: 608:File:Stick insect02.jpg 2442: 2267: 2096: 1739: 1701:nominated for deletion 1671: 1494:RfA Results and Thanks 1275:translation department 1193: 1139: 1095: 1004:Looper5920/Archive 2, 612: 204: 42: 35: 2467:FYI. I replaced the 2441: 2266: 2101:request for adminship 2095: 1889:Thanks for uploading 1723: 1670: 1543:My (HereToHelp’s) RfA 1439:- first female Marine 1263:An effort to build a 1205:Issue I - March 2006 1192: 1137: 1094: 611: 592:have been ordered. -- 203: 41: 34: 2489:Defense Link article 2463:4th Marines insignia 413:Marine article watch 248:Guantanamo detainees 18:User talk:Looper5920 2587:USMC portal picture 2087: 1720:File:1000000eme.jpg 1423:Lieutenant General 1404:Barbara J. Dulinsky 1397:Barbara O. Barnwell 1310:, Lead Coordinator 1260:—have been created. 1129: 746:I saw you reverted 297:Richard A. Anderson 2443: 2373:Theodore Roosevelt 2305:Do you mean Proto? 2268: 2097: 1959:Katherine A. Towle 1872:WWI MoH recipients 1864:Ernest Janson page 1740: 1672: 1431:Katherine A. Towle 1383:Jeanette I. Sustad 1370:Margaret A. Brewer 1368:Brigadier General 1293:participate in. 1194: 1166:Commandant/General 1140: 1096: 1008:you for voting on 883:United States Army 752:Christopher Parham 613: 205: 198: 43: 36: 27:I'm an admin now!! 2579: 2302: 2301: 2225: 2218: 2213: 1846:Interesting note 1816: 1815: 1780: 1779: 1636:my RfA nomination 1627: 1626: 1540: 1539: 1376:Barbara J. Bishop 1335: 1334: 1318:Current proposals 1272:The newly-formed 1084: 1083: 920: 913: 908: 858: 851: 846: 815: 808: 803: 353:Things you can do 194: 101: 94: 89: 2777: 2645: 2640: 2631:April 2006 issue 2578: 2298: 2293: 2275: 2259: 2258: 2221: 2216: 2212: 2210: 2204: 2203: 2200: 2194: 2156:your recent edit 2150:Camp Whitehorse? 2014:Selected picture 2002:Selected article 1951:"Red Mike" Edson 1856:Ernest A. Janson 1848:Ernest A. Janson 1835: 1830: 1791: 1784: 1770: 1749: 1742: 1721: 1619: 1608: 1601: 1536: 1514:welcome to do so 1498: 1497: 1464: 1458: 1454: 1448: 1437:Opha Mae Johnson 1402:Master Sergeant 1345: 1305: 1185: 1184: 1075: 1070: 1065: 1060: 1039: 1032: 1031: 1019: 916: 911: 907: 905: 899: 898: 895: 889: 854: 849: 845: 843: 837: 836: 833: 827: 811: 806: 802: 800: 794: 793: 790: 784: 651: 645: 638:US-mil- subtypes 630: 609: 531:ProdigySportsman 517:ProdigySportsman 429:WikiNews article 338:Featured Article 283:Joaquin Murietta 122: 118:US-mil-USMC-stub 116: 97: 92: 88: 86: 80: 79: 76: 70: 2785: 2784: 2780: 2779: 2778: 2776: 2775: 2774: 2727: 2658: 2627: 2619: 2589: 2567: 2546: 2484: 2465: 2436: 2422: 2325: 2307: 2257: 2235: 2224: 2183: 2152: 2118: 2090: 1997:Specifically: 1992: 1978: 1947: 1932: 1887: 1860:Ernest Janson's 1852: 1821: 1766: 1719: 1716: 1693: 1665: 1632: 1617: 1599: 1571: 1545: 1496: 1462: 1456: 1452: 1446: 1425:Carol A. Mutter 1409:2nd Lieutenant 1351: 1337: 1218:An independent 1203: 1183: 1168: 1132: 1114: 1089: 1077: 1073: 1068: 1063: 1058: 1030: 1025: 1002: 979: 945:Pappy Boyington 930: 919: 857: 814: 777: 744: 721: 649: 643: 640: 628: 607: 604: 578: 573: 541: 527: 512: 457: 415: 335: 293: 275: 244: 222: 217: 192: 179:Tony the Marine 170:Tony the Marine 159:Tony the Marine 154: 152:Pedro del Valle 120: 114: 111: 100: 64: 29: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 2783: 2781: 2773: 2772: 2752: 2751: 2746: 2741: 2736: 2726: 2723: 2722: 2721: 2720: 2719: 2718: 2717: 2676: 2675: 2672: 2669: 2666: 2657: 2654: 2626: 2623: 2618: 2615: 2613: 2611: 2610: 2588: 2585: 2566: 2563: 2561: 2545: 2542: 2541: 2540: 2539: 2538: 2518: 2483: 2480: 2464: 2461: 2451:drop me a line 2435: 2432: 2421: 2418: 2417: 2416: 2405: 2404: 2382:Russo-Japanese 2369: 2368: 2340: 2339: 2336: 2333: 2324: 2321: 2306: 2303: 2300: 2299: 2276: 2269: 2256: 2253: 2234: 2231: 2222: 2182: 2181:COMINRON SEVEN 2179: 2178: 2177: 2151: 2148: 2147: 2146: 2145: 2144: 2117: 2114: 2089: 2086: 2085: 2084: 2083: 2082: 2081: 2080: 2073:Roll with it-- 2064: 2043: 2042: 2041: 2040: 2018: 2017: 2011: 2005: 1991: 1988: 1977: 1974: 1963: 1962: 1946: 1945:Portal updates 1943: 1931: 1928: 1913: 1912: 1907: 1886: 1883: 1851: 1844: 1820: 1817: 1814: 1813: 1792: 1778: 1777: 1750: 1726:newly produced 1715: 1712: 1692: 1686: 1664: 1661: 1631: 1628: 1625: 1624: 1609: 1598: 1595: 1594: 1593: 1570: 1567: 1544: 1541: 1538: 1537: 1530: 1510:final: 65/29/7 1495: 1492: 1491: 1490: 1443: 1442: 1441: 1440: 1434: 1427: 1417: 1416: 1415: 1414: 1407: 1400: 1389: 1388: 1387: 1386: 1379: 1372: 1350: 1347: 1338:delivered by 1333: 1332: 1331: 1330: 1320: 1319: 1313: 1312: 1290: 1289: 1281: 1280: 1279: 1270: 1261: 1248:—dealing with 1242: 1235:Ferdinand Foch 1227:The project's 1225: 1215: 1214: 1208: 1207: 1206: 1204: 1195: 1182: 1179: 1167: 1164: 1131: 1128: 1118:Roman Catholic 1113: 1110: 1088: 1085: 1082: 1081: 1055: 1053: 1044: 1043: 1040: 1029: 1026: 1003: 1001: 998: 978: 975: 974: 973: 953: 952: 947: 942: 929: 928:Portal updates 926: 917: 875: 874: 855: 812: 776: 773: 772: 771: 743: 740: 720: 717: 716: 715: 714: 713: 712: 711: 710: 709: 700: 639: 636: 603: 600: 577: 574: 572: 566: 565: 564: 540: 539:Camp Pendleton 537: 526: 523: 511: 508: 507: 506: 505: 504: 493: 456: 453: 452: 451: 450: 449: 414: 411: 410: 409: 408: 407: 406: 405: 382: 381: 380: 379: 349: 346: 339: 334: 331: 330: 329: 328: 327: 322: 292: 289: 274: 269: 243: 240: 221: 218: 193: 191: 188: 187: 186: 185: 184: 153: 150: 149: 148: 110: 109:USMC stub idea 107: 98: 63: 60: 28: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2782: 2771: 2768: 2764: 2763: 2762: 2761: 2757: 2750: 2747: 2745: 2742: 2740: 2737: 2735: 2732: 2731: 2730: 2724: 2716: 2713: 2709: 2708: 2707: 2703: 2698: 2697: 2696: 2693: 2688: 2687: 2686: 2685: 2681: 2673: 2670: 2667: 2664: 2663: 2662: 2655: 2653: 2652: 2649: 2646: 2641: 2636: 2632: 2624: 2622: 2616: 2614: 2609: 2606: 2602: 2601: 2600: 2599: 2595: 2586: 2584: 2583: 2580: 2576: 2572: 2564: 2562: 2559: 2558: 2555: 2551: 2543: 2537: 2534: 2529: 2528: 2527: 2523: 2519: 2517: 2513: 2509: 2505: 2504: 2503: 2502: 2498: 2494: 2490: 2481: 2479: 2478: 2474: 2470: 2462: 2460: 2459: 2456: 2452: 2448: 2440: 2433: 2431: 2430: 2427: 2419: 2415: 2412: 2407: 2406: 2401: 2397: 2396: 2395: 2394: 2391: 2387: 2383: 2379: 2378:Sergius Witte 2374: 2367: 2364: 2360: 2355: 2354: 2353: 2352: 2349: 2344: 2337: 2334: 2331: 2330: 2329: 2323:USMC Articles 2322: 2320: 2319: 2316: 2312: 2304: 2297: 2294: 2289: 2285: 2281: 2274: 2270: 2265: 2261: 2260: 2254: 2252: 2251: 2248: 2243: 2242: 2238: 2232: 2230: 2229: 2226: 2219: 2214: 2209: 2205: 2195: 2188: 2180: 2176: 2173: 2168: 2167: 2166: 2165: 2162: 2157: 2149: 2143: 2139: 2135: 2134: 2133: 2132: 2131: 2130: 2126: 2121: 2115: 2113: 2112: 2109: 2106: 2102: 2094: 2079: 2076: 2072: 2071: 2069: 2065: 2063: 2059: 2055: 2054: 2053: 2049: 2045: 2044: 2039: 2036: 2032: 2031: 2030: 2029: 2028: 2027: 2023: 2015: 2012: 2009: 2006: 2003: 2000: 1999: 1998: 1995: 1989: 1987: 1986: 1983: 1975: 1973: 1972: 1968: 1960: 1956: 1955: 1954: 1952: 1944: 1942: 1941: 1937: 1929: 1927: 1926: 1922: 1918: 1911: 1908: 1906: 1903: 1902: 1901: 1898: 1896: 1895:copyright tag 1892: 1884: 1882: 1881: 1877: 1873: 1869: 1865: 1861: 1857: 1849: 1845: 1843: 1842: 1839: 1836: 1831: 1826: 1818: 1812: 1809: 1805: 1801: 1797: 1793: 1790: 1786: 1785: 1782: 1776: 1773: 1771: 1769: 1763: 1759: 1755: 1751: 1748: 1744: 1743: 1738: 1735: 1731: 1727: 1722: 1713: 1711: 1710: 1706: 1702: 1698: 1690: 1687: 1685: 1684: 1681: 1677: 1669: 1662: 1660: 1659: 1656: 1651: 1647: 1643: 1639: 1637: 1629: 1623: 1620: 1614: 1613:administrator 1610: 1607: 1603: 1602: 1596: 1592: 1588: 1584: 1583: 1582: 1581: 1577: 1568: 1566: 1565: 1562: 1559: 1558: 1554: 1550: 1542: 1535: 1531: 1529: 1528: 1525: 1519: 1515: 1511: 1507: 1506:my recent RfA 1503: 1500: 1499: 1493: 1489: 1485: 1481: 1478: 1477: 1476: 1475: 1471: 1466: 1461: 1451: 1438: 1435: 1432: 1428: 1426: 1422: 1421: 1419: 1418: 1412: 1408: 1405: 1401: 1398: 1394: 1393: 1391: 1390: 1384: 1380: 1377: 1373: 1371: 1367: 1366: 1364: 1363: 1362: 1360: 1356: 1355:Erlene Thomas 1348: 1346: 1344: 1341: 1328: 1327: 1322: 1321: 1317: 1316: 1314: 1311: 1309: 1306: 1301: 1297: 1294: 1288: 1284: 1283: 1277: 1276: 1271: 1268: 1267: 1262: 1259: 1258: 1253: 1252: 1247: 1243: 1240: 1236: 1232: 1231: 1226: 1223: 1222: 1217: 1216: 1212: 1211: 1209: 1202: 1200: 1191: 1186: 1180: 1178: 1177: 1174: 1165: 1163: 1162: 1159: 1158: 1155: 1154: 1149: 1145: 1136: 1130:DaGizza's RfA 1127: 1126: 1123: 1119: 1111: 1109: 1108: 1105: 1101: 1093: 1086: 1080: 1076: 1071: 1066: 1061: 1054: 1050: 1046: 1045: 1038: 1033: 1027: 1024: 1023: 1020: 1018: 1011: 1007: 999: 997: 996: 993: 989: 984: 976: 972: 969: 965: 964: 963: 962: 958: 951: 948: 946: 943: 941: 938: 937: 936: 933: 927: 925: 924: 921: 914: 909: 904: 900: 890: 884: 879: 873: 870: 865: 864: 863: 862: 859: 852: 847: 842: 838: 828: 820: 819: 816: 809: 804: 799: 795: 785: 775:congrats back 774: 770: 767: 762: 761: 760: 759: 756: 753: 749: 741: 739: 738: 734: 730: 726: 718: 708: 705: 701: 699: 696: 692: 691: 690: 687: 683: 682: 681: 678: 674: 673: 672: 669: 665: 664: 663: 662: 659: 655: 648: 647:Stub category 637: 635: 634: 631: 626: 622: 618: 610: 601: 599: 598: 595: 591: 587: 583: 575: 571: 570:Uriah P. Levy 567: 563: 560: 556: 555: 554: 553: 550: 546: 538: 536: 535: 532: 524: 522: 521: 518: 509: 503: 499: 494: 492: 488: 483: 482: 481: 478: 473: 472: 471: 470: 466: 462: 461:Wesley L. Fox 454: 448: 444: 440: 439: 438: 434: 430: 427: 426: 425: 424: 420: 412: 404: 400: 396: 395: 394: 390: 386: 385: 384: 383: 378: 375: 370: 365: 364: 363: 359: 354: 350: 348:Collaboration 347: 344: 340: 337: 336: 332: 326: 323: 321: 317: 312: 311: 309: 308: 307: 306: 302: 298: 290: 288: 287: 284: 280: 273: 270: 268: 267: 264: 258: 255: 253: 249: 241: 239: 238: 234: 229: 225: 219: 216: 213: 209: 202: 197: 189: 183: 180: 176: 175: 174: 171: 166: 165: 164: 163: 160: 151: 147: 144: 139: 136: 135: 134: 133: 129: 124: 119: 108: 106: 105: 102: 95: 90: 85: 81: 71: 61: 59: 58: 55: 52: 48: 40: 33: 19: 2753: 2728: 2677: 2659: 2628: 2620: 2612: 2590: 2568: 2560: 2547: 2485: 2466: 2444: 2423: 2370: 2345: 2341: 2326: 2310: 2308: 2272: 2244: 2239: 2236: 2184: 2153: 2122: 2119: 2098: 2019: 2013: 2008:Did you know 2007: 2001: 1996: 1993: 1979: 1964: 1948: 1933: 1914: 1899: 1888: 1868:Find-A-Grave 1853: 1822: 1799: 1781: 1767: 1757: 1694: 1673: 1652: 1648: 1644: 1640: 1633: 1572: 1556: 1546: 1521: 1517: 1509: 1501: 1479: 1467: 1444: 1358: 1352: 1336: 1324: 1298: 1295: 1291: 1287:Coordinators 1273: 1264: 1255: 1249: 1228: 1219: 1213:Project news 1196: 1169: 1156: 1152: 1141: 1115: 1097: 1078: 1048: 1017:¡Dustimagic! 1016: 1013: 1005: 980: 954: 934: 931: 880: 876: 821: 778: 745: 722: 653: 641: 621:my talk page 616: 614: 580:I convey my 579: 568:Barnstar -- 542: 528: 513: 458: 416: 294: 279:Carolyn Wood 276: 272:Carolyn Wood 259: 256: 251: 247: 245: 230: 226: 223: 195: 155: 125: 112: 65: 44: 2729:How about? 2469:4th Marines 2386:Roman Rosen 2185:I've saved 2088:Kusma's RfA 2004:? Criteria? 1804:let me know 1762:let me know 1680:CBDunkerson 1257:Middle Ages 1246:task forces 992:Pepsidrinka 559:Will Beback 549:Will Beback 242:US-mil-stub 2767:Looper5920 2712:Looper5920 2692:Looper5920 2635:Kirill Lok 2605:Looper5920 2533:Looper5920 2411:Looper5920 2363:Looper5920 2273:Thank you! 2172:Looper5920 2075:Looper5920 2035:Looper5920 1825:Kirill Lok 1808:TigerShark 1663:RFA Thanks 1655:TigerShark 1618:Gryffindor 1411:Sarah Deal 1300:Kirill Lok 1201:Newsletter 1173:Nobunaga24 1148:talk to me 1000:RfA thanks 968:Looper5920 869:Looper5920 766:Looper5920 729:deeptrivia 695:Looper5920 668:Looper5920 602:Makemi RfA 477:Looper5920 459:How about 455:Portal Bio 374:Looper5920 341:How about 143:Looper5920 2554:Hossens27 2315:Petros471 2255:Thank you 1982:Hossens27 1976:Re:Thanks 1917:OrphanBot 1823:Done :-) 1819:Re: Favor 1730:abilities 1699:has been 1597:Thank you 1450:unsourced 1323:Proposed 1285:From the 1006:thank you 950:Ira Hayes 748:this edit 652:is for a 586:Come here 582:greetings 2491:; also, 2390:SimonATL 2348:SimonATL 2247:Brownlee 2161:Geo Swan 1724:Another 1524:joturner 1429:Colonel 1381:Colonel 1374:Colonel 1254:and the 1244:Two new 1104:Khoikhoi 940:Dan Daly 525:Re: USMC 510:Re: USMC 343:Joe Foss 263:Geo Swan 2756:ERcheck 2702:ERcheck 2680:ERcheck 2617:Infobox 2594:ERcheck 2565:Infobox 2522:ERcheck 2512:ERcheck 2497:ERcheck 2473:ERcheck 2455:Dijxtra 2359:ERcheck 2296:ng Aili 2138:ERcheck 2125:ERcheck 2068:ERcheck 2058:ERcheck 2048:ERcheck 2022:ERcheck 1967:ERcheck 1936:ERcheck 1876:ERcheck 1800:62/13/6 1768:Prodego 1705:ERcheck 1587:ERcheck 1576:ERcheck 1484:ERcheck 1470:ERcheck 1138:Thanks! 1087:Thanks! 1049:54/20/7 1042:My RfA 957:ERcheck 594:Bhadani 498:ERcheck 487:ERcheck 475:there-- 465:ERcheck 443:ERcheck 433:ERcheck 419:ERcheck 399:ERcheck 389:ERcheck 358:ERcheck 316:ERcheck 301:ERcheck 233:ERcheck 212:Gflores 128:ERcheck 62:project 2575:Emt147 2447:my RfA 2434:Thanks 2426:Mark83 2420:My RfA 2202:Jester 2154:I saw 1930:Thanks 1796:my RfA 1758:77/3/0 1754:my RfA 1714:My RfA 1630:My RfA 1549:my RfA 1460:verify 1144:my RfA 1028:My RfA 1010:my RfA 977:My RfA 897:Jester 835:Jester 792:Jester 755:(talk) 725:my RfA 654:parent 617:45/7/1 590:laddus 190:My RFA 78:Jester 54:(talk) 47:WP:100 2223:Fire! 2105:Kusma 1734:Hoary 1561:oHelp 1395:Ssgt 1340:Loopy 1153:Gizza 1122:Spout 918:Fire! 856:Fire! 813:Fire! 576:Hello 99:Fire! 51:Gator 16:< 2629:The 2506:See 2453:. -- 2400:this 2284:talk 2199:SWAT 2108:(討論) 1553:Here 1522:--- 1480:DONE 1361:. 1197:The 1112:RCHS 1074:Toth 988:talk 894:SWAT 832:SWAT 789:SWAT 733:talk 704:Alai 686:Alai 677:Alai 658:Alai 75:SWAT 2280:RfA 2217:Aim 1866:. 1703:. — 1691:AfD 1676:RFA 1504:in 1349:AfD 1308:hin 1100:RfA 983:RfA 981:My 912:Aim 850:Aim 807:Aim 742:Hey 719:Hi! 629:emi 625:Mak 299:. — 250:or 208:RfA 93:Aim 2758:@ 2704:@ 2682:@ 2648:in 2596:@ 2524:@ 2514:@ 2499:@ 2475:@ 2140:@ 2127:@ 2070:@ 2060:@ 2050:@ 2024:@ 1969:@ 1938:@ 1923:. 1878:@ 1838:in 1764:. 1707:@ 1589:@ 1578:@ 1520:. 1486:@ 1472:@ 1463:}} 1457:{{ 1453:}} 1447:{{ 1150:. 959:@ 867:-- 735:) 650:}} 644:{{ 515:-- 500:@ 489:@ 467:@ 445:@ 435:@ 421:@ 401:@ 391:@ 360:@ 318:@ 303:@ 235:@ 130:@ 121:}} 115:{{ 2700:— 2644:h 2639:s 2592:— 2292:a 2288:F 2193:⇒ 2020:— 2010:? 1834:h 1829:s 1574:— 1557:T 1468:— 1304:s 1241:. 1069:a 1064:z 1059:A 1056:→ 955:— 888:⇒ 826:⇒ 783:⇒ 731:( 496:— 485:— 356:— 314:— 69:⇒

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index