Knowledge

User talk:Lotus in the hills

Source 📝

543: 289: 229: 25:, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Knowledge. Under the 129:
Thanks for your message. yes, I have noticed that you are making needed biographical contributions for missing Buddhist scholars. I shall contribute if I feel I can add anything useful, time allowing. There are also a number of modern Japanese scholars who should get a mention, but who do not yet
204:
Hi, thanks for your work contributing to articles. I hope you won't mind if I make one suggestion. It's best to avoid words like "furthermore", "thus" and "therefor". It can be a challenge sometimes I know, but these words make articles read more like arguments and essays. Take care.
348:
and other Hindu Law and monarchy articles. I read on your userpage that you are collaborating as part of a project at UW-Madison. Can you let me know (to satisfy my curiosity) whether this is a course project and which college/department is involved ? Regards.
147:
I noticed that you posted the article about Caroline Rhys Davids, I posted the article about her son, Arthur. Would be interested in discussing a few points with you regarding the effect that his death had upon her work if you have the time.
499:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 49:
explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.
559: 457:
on the article talk page with some questions and suggestions. Please take a look whenever you have the time and let me know if you have any questions/comments. Cheers.
114:
Definitely justified. The son of the illustrious Ernst Gombrich who is himself an authority on Sanskrit and Buddhism needs a wiki of his own. I'm glad you created it.
103:
a couple days ago, so I thought it was an interesting coincidence that you'd just made a Gombrich article. I'm glad it got saved; he deserves an article.
316:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the 256:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the 431:
review process. I will be happy to read through some of your articles over the next few days and make changes and/or add comments on the talk page.
524: 564: 76: 520: 364:
Thanks for your reply. I hope you and your colleagues will continue to edit wikipedia even after the course has ended. We can
416:
on my own, but I would suggest that we need not bother with that intermediate step and instead get the article ready for a
53: 191:
page up, though I'm planning on adding more if I can find the time. (I am supposed to respond on your talk page right?)
511:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
516: 317: 257: 33:, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add 549: 534: 423:
Also note that article rating are based on both the content and the conformance of the article with the wikipedia
251: 210: 554: 553:
has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the
394:
review. That can provide useful feedback from readers who are not necessarily familiar with the topic. Cheers.
157: 89: 288: 228: 194: 74: 412:
by Redtigerxyz, who is an experienced editor of Hinduism-related articles. I could bump up the rating to
115: 572: 557:
guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at
304: 244: 46: 427:. The latter can be a stumbling block for editors who have not gone through or looked over the GA or 206: 30: 177: 512: 462: 436: 399: 381: 354: 330: 311: 270: 167: 131: 345: 166:
My email is ssnetherholme@yahoo.co.uk Would probably be easier to communicate that way, Thanks.
488: 479: 188: 149: 69: 568: 508: 492: 85: 22: 507:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 38: 390:
Incidentally, you should consider nominating some of the articles you have worked on for
504: 496: 458: 454: 432: 395: 377: 369: 350: 326: 266: 65: 61: 500: 424: 104: 57: 52:
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria
26: 576: 528: 466: 450: 440: 428: 417: 403: 391: 385: 373: 358: 334: 274: 214: 160: 134: 118: 107: 92: 78: 68:. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. 295: 235: 130:
have entries. I am thinking of people like Akira Hirakawa, Gadjin Nagao etc.--
446: 29:, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please 453:
in the article history for the reasoning for each edit. I have also left a
368:
use editors who have such good grasp of both the subject material, and our
45:
on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on
495:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge
299: 239: 187:
Yeah, I'm not sure either. It is really useful though. I got my
376:
policies. Best wishes for your on/off-wiki endeavors. Cheers.
31:
see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable
88:
page for why I think an article on him is justified.
487:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current 445:I have made some (mainly) stylistic edits to 8: 408:I am surprised that the articles were rated 420:review, which is a more formalized process. 125:Biographical articles for Buddhist scholars 283: 223: 308:was updated with a fact from the article 248:was updated with a fact from the article 344:It was a pleasure reading your work at 7: 14: 513:review the candidates' statements 220:DYK for Monarchy in Ancient India 156:Sure, Fluellen, I'd be happy to. 541: 287: 227: 537:has been nominated for merging 519:. For the Election committee, 489:Arbitration Committee election 480:ArbCom elections are now open! 119:02:13, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 1: 529:13:46, 23 November 2015 (UTC) 467:00:17, 27 December 2008 (UTC) 441:23:02, 26 December 2008 (UTC) 404:22:27, 26 December 2008 (UTC) 386:22:08, 26 December 2008 (UTC) 359:18:49, 24 December 2008 (UTC) 335:18:07, 12 December 2008 (UTC) 275:05:56, 12 December 2008 (UTC) 550:Category:Finnish Indologists 535:Category:Finnish Indologists 215:19:31, 6 December 2008 (UTC) 27:criteria for speedy deletion 515:and submit your choices on 280:DYK for Hindu Titles of Law 592: 577:20:24, 11 March 2023 (UTC) 521:MediaWiki message delivery 161:16:21, 12 April 2007 (UTC) 135:01:08, 16 March 2007 (UTC) 108:23:33, 10 March 2007 (UTC) 93:02:55, 10 March 2007 (UTC) 84:Please see my post on the 565:categories for discussion 252:Monarchy in Ancient India 79:22:48, 9 March 2007 (UTC) 21:A tag has been placed on 99:I just finished reading 17:Richard Gombrich Article 318:Did you know? talk page 258:Did you know? talk page 47:the article's talk page 493:Arbitration Committee 370:neutral point-of-view 173:Well Boobs to you too 560:the category's entry 340:Comment and question 152:15:55, 7 April 2007 140:Caroline Rhys Davids 497:arbitration process 312:Hindu Titles of Law 509:arbitration policy 200:Comment on wording 101:Theravada Buddhism 567:page. Thank you. 374:reliable sourcing 324: 323: 264: 263: 583: 545: 544: 449:- please see my 291: 284: 231: 224: 86:Richard Gombrich 44: 43: 37: 23:Richard Gombrich 591: 590: 586: 585: 584: 582: 581: 580: 546: 542: 539: 517:the voting page 483: 425:manual of style 342: 282: 222: 207:ChildofMidnight 202: 195:Badgerblueliner 185: 175: 142: 127: 54:for biographies 41: 35: 34: 19: 12: 11: 5: 589: 587: 555:categorization 540: 538: 532: 486: 482: 477: 476: 475: 474: 473: 472: 471: 470: 469: 451:edit summaries 421: 341: 338: 322: 321: 292: 281: 278: 262: 261: 232: 221: 218: 201: 198: 184: 181: 174: 171: 164: 163: 141: 138: 126: 123: 122: 121: 116:220.255.33.172 111: 110: 96: 95: 18: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 588: 579: 578: 574: 570: 566: 562: 561: 556: 552: 551: 536: 533: 531: 530: 526: 522: 518: 514: 510: 506: 502: 498: 494: 490: 481: 478: 468: 464: 460: 456: 452: 448: 444: 443: 442: 438: 434: 430: 426: 422: 419: 415: 411: 407: 406: 405: 401: 397: 393: 389: 388: 387: 383: 379: 375: 371: 367: 363: 362: 361: 360: 356: 352: 347: 339: 337: 336: 332: 328: 319: 315: 314: 313: 307: 306: 305:Did you know? 301: 297: 293: 290: 286: 285: 279: 277: 276: 272: 268: 259: 255: 254: 253: 247: 246: 245:Did you know? 241: 237: 233: 230: 226: 225: 219: 217: 216: 212: 208: 199: 197: 196: 192: 190: 182: 180: 179: 172: 170: 169: 162: 159: 155: 154: 153: 151: 145: 139: 137: 136: 133: 132:Stephen Hodge 124: 120: 117: 113: 112: 109: 106: 102: 98: 97: 94: 91: 87: 83: 82: 81: 80: 77: 75: 73: 72: 67: 66:for companies 63: 59: 58:for web sites 55: 50: 48: 40: 32: 28: 24: 16: 558: 548: 547: 484: 413: 409: 392:good article 365: 346:Dharmaśāstra 343: 325: 310: 309: 303: 265: 250: 249: 243: 203: 193: 186: 176: 168:Fluellen1916 165: 150:Fluellen1916 146: 143: 128: 100: 71:Patricknoddy 70: 51: 20: 569:Estopedist1 296:12 December 236:12 December 189:prāyaścitta 183:Prāyaścitta 505:topic bans 501:site bans 459:Abecedare 447:Hindu law 433:Abecedare 396:Abecedare 378:Abecedare 351:Abecedare 327:BorgQueen 267:BorgQueen 178:SadieBean 62:for bands 105:Stebbins 563:on the 491:. The 366:really 39:hangon 158:Lotus 90:Lotus 64:, or 573:talk 525:talk 463:talk 455:note 437:talk 400:talk 382:talk 372:and 355:talk 331:talk 300:2008 271:talk 240:2008 211:talk 144:HI, 485:Hi, 294:On 234:On 575:) 527:) 503:, 465:) 439:) 429:FA 418:GA 402:) 384:) 357:) 333:) 320:. 302:, 298:, 273:) 260:. 242:, 238:, 213:) 60:, 56:, 42:}} 36:{{ 571:( 523:( 461:( 435:( 414:B 410:C 398:( 380:( 353:( 329:( 269:( 209:(

Index

Richard Gombrich
criteria for speedy deletion
see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable
hangon
the article's talk page
for biographies
for web sites
for bands
for companies
Patricknoddy


22:48, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
Richard Gombrich
Lotus
02:55, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
Stebbins
23:33, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
220.255.33.172
02:13, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
Stephen Hodge
01:08, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
Fluellen1916
Lotus
16:21, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
Fluellen1916
SadieBean
prāyaścitta
Badgerblueliner
ChildofMidnight

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.