Knowledge (XXG)

User talk:MGA73bot

Source 📝

398: 28:
and just license my images under CC? Why might I want to do that? Can I revert my license to GFDL? Why might I want to do that. I think it would be helpful for the bot to give more info for the creator who hasn't been paying so much attention. i.e. linking to a page that is written for someone who hasn't been paying the closest attention to licensing on Knowledge (XXG).
800:
Wouldn't be a bad solution. Besides, it seems to me that if there's a FUR on the image, there's a good chance it isn't free and ought to be deleted at commons. Is there a way to create lists of images with FUR at en.wiki and are on commons? I'd be willing to help comb through to see which image is
446:
deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can
785:
Yes I noticed that there are some cases like that. At the moment the bot does not know how to check if the file is nominated for deletion on Commons. There is a lot of things that should be fixed before the bot works as well as I would like it to. Perhaps we should just skip all files that is marked
239:
The template is added a few minutes before images are transfered to Commons and hereafter the image can be deleted on Knowledge (XXG). So I hope it does not bother anyone. I could remove it after transfer but that would just be an extra edit on a image that should be deleted anyway. There is a minor
233:
Hi IngerAlHaosului! I know it does not excist om Knowledge (XXG) but the template excists on Commons where it is very important that it is added. I have a list of images on Knowledge (XXG) with a free license on Flickr ~1,200 images. I have to rename some of the images during transfer because a file
696:
Hi! That is a very good question. It should not be possible. Bot should only change usage if the file was actually moved. I have never seen cases like that before and I have moved thousands of files. I moved the file to Commons and checked. It is ok now. The license migration has nothing to do with
300:
Once again thank you. I deleted the files you had tagged on Commons. I found out it was much easier to search on enwiki. I found no IFD and only a few PUF. I think the PUF could be kept so I did not delete them on Commons yet. If result is deleted on enwiki you are most welcome to nominate them for
143:
I usually work on Commons where the subject have been discussed in and out and up and down and... I'm only here to help finish the migration so I did not notice that introduction could be better. I asumed users has been informed on the village pump etc. Never mind I will see if I can find a link or
27:
Hi, I created many images that are on Knowledge (XXG). This bot appears to be modifying their license per some license modification process that I somehow agreed to at some point. This is fine. My problem is that I don't understand what the license situation is now. Can I delete what the bot put in
187:
Hi! The images should not be deleted just because it is not possible to migrate the license. They should only be deleted if they are not in scope or if copyright is not ok etc. Migration is a project to help others to use the images so we prefer that GFDL is not the only license.
448: 620: 582:
Yes I know about the red categories. An easy solution (if you know how to fix the code) is to let the template categorize in the "top category" if sub category does not exists. And untill that is done I have a link here
624: 283:
Thank you for the notice. Such images should not have been on the list. Well sadly they are. There is only a few images left on the list so I will finish the bot run and try to search out the images on Commons.
854:
Yes most of the files that is no longer on the list is most likely deleted on Commons but some may be deleted on en-wiki. Anyway instead of ignoring the files completely an alternative option was to add a
436:(just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on 824: 83:
Oh.. Well I added a small comment there. Hope it will help you understand why we have this migration project. If you do not like it there is a possibility to opt-out as mentioned on the page. --
438: 339:
Thank you for fixing it and thank you for telling me. That should not be a problem but something did go wrong. I will have to do some search to see if there is other errors like that. --
432: 405: 391: 561: 499:
Thank you for the notice. It should not be possible but as you can see it was. Thank you for letting me know. I will ask someone if they have an idea what happend. --
234:
with the same name could excist or because filename on Knowledge (XXG) could be bad. Therefore adding the template on Knowledge (XXG) before transfer is much easier.
697:
moving the files to Commons. All free files can be moved to Commons. License migration is only about adding cc-by-sa-3.0 to files with the license GFDL. --
113:, but instead the documentation provided to the image content creator who does not spend all his/her time paying attention to Knowledge (XXG) licensing. 740:
to en.wiki images that are up for deletion on commons. Not sure that ought to be the case. Is there a way for the bot to check for DRs at commons?
387: 367:
I also improved the edit description so it now shows the file names. So if any mistakes happen in the future we can just look for any red links. --
564:, so it will likely never be seen by admins. I'd personally recommend just using the current date to ensure that the tag is seen and acted upon. – 172:
I would just like to ask if my image will be deleted if I don't do anything? I read the link given to me and it didn't answer my simple question.
43:
Hi PDBailey. If you look in the history of the file that have been changed there should be a edit summary just like this "Changing license in
926:
I checked the file and the problem with the file was that the license template was substed. The bot should work when a correct license. --
44: 484:
broke an image and an external link. (I realise this was five months ago, but I have no way of telling if the bug has been fixed yet.) --
917: 466: 914: 727: 636: 610: 573: 532: 859: 543: 273: 223: 452: 16:
Hi! This page belongs to a bot. The operater is from the Danish Knowledge (XXG). Please contact me there --: -->
865:
instead. That way we could see that the file is on Commons but the file ends up in a "Be careful"-category. --
770:. (The background story is that these were obvious copyvios on commons that I moved to en.wiki with an FUR)-- 37: 910: 408:, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge (XXG). This has been done for the following reason: 265: 261: 212: 240:
risk that the template is added on nonfree images and if so it can/should ofcourse be removed on sight. --
260:
Several recent files tagged with possibly unfree and image for deletion have been moved to commons like
177: 118: 66: 33: 173: 269: 219: 61:
I guess the point is that it didn't. I commented on this at that page, and two other editors agreed.
17: 909:
This bot seems to be adding the same parameter redundantly many times over on some occasions, e.g.
884: 845: 806: 775: 734: 114: 62: 29: 632: 606: 569: 528: 406:
Category:Knowledge (XXG) files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons as of 20 February 2009
392:
Category:Knowledge (XXG) files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons as of 20 February 2009
423:
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding
686: 489: 330: 417: 931: 870: 831: 791: 702: 650: 592: 562:
Category:Knowledge (XXG) files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons as of 15 April 2011
551: 504: 372: 358: 344: 333: 306: 289: 245: 193: 149: 88: 52: 420:, articles that do not meet basic Knowledge (XXG) criteria may be deleted at any time. 880: 841: 802: 771: 717: 628: 602: 565: 524: 682: 485: 461: 322: 927: 866: 827: 787: 698: 646: 588: 584: 547: 500: 456: 368: 354: 340: 302: 285: 241: 189: 145: 84: 48: 681:. And .pg is not an appropriate filename extension for a JPEG file anyway. -- 621:
Category:All Knowledge (XXG) files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons
625:
Category:All Knowledge (XXG) files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons
268:
i ask this bot be stopped until safeguards to prevent this are in place.--
353:
I found 11 pages where the bot made an error. I hope I found them all. --
935: 920: 888: 874: 849: 835: 810: 795: 779: 706: 690: 654: 640: 614: 596: 577: 555: 536: 508: 493: 471: 376: 362: 348: 310: 293: 277: 249: 227: 197: 181: 153: 122: 92: 70: 56: 560:
Hmm... I see. The problem is, it puts the file into the non-existant
412:
Please delete this category and its contents - all has passed review.
826:
should give you a list. When I ran the query there was 150 files. --
677:? The file had not been moved to Commons, and MGA73bot had even 442:
explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for
396: 840:
Interesting. A lot of them were already DR'd at commons.--
23:
As a creator, I don't really like this bots current actions
913:
and several other images. Any idea why this is happening?
301:
deletion on Commons. I also put them on my watchlist. --
109:
The issue is not that I object to the migration process
768: 765: 762: 759: 756: 753: 750: 747: 744: 741: 678: 674: 520: 481: 326: 47:". Clicking the link should answer your questions. -- 22: 523:
was made on April 15 like the bot thinks it was... –
542:
No the edit was not made on April 15 but the file (
144:somthing that could do things a little better. -- 587:that I use to "hunt" files in red categories. -- 879:Seems like a good solution to me. Good work.-- 433:the page that has been nominated for deletion 8: 713:NowCommons, but up for deletion on commons 546:) has been on Commons since that date. -- 218:to image a template that doesn't exist-- 786:with a unfree template on en-wiki. -- 679:marked it as ineligible for migration 7: 455:the page or email a copy to you. -- 325:it rendered the word 'Medellín" as ' 601:Ah, okay. Nevermind then. Thanks! – 329:', breaking the link to an image. 619:"All members" categories created: 544:Commons:File:3rdMarineDivision.gif 451:to request that the administrator 14: 316: 154:08:55, 15 September 2009 (UTC) 123:21:16, 14 September 2009 (UTC) 93:20:50, 14 September 2009 (UTC) 71:20:19, 14 September 2009 (UTC) 57:20:06, 14 September 2009 (UTC) 38:16:04, 14 September 2009 (UTC) 1: 472:01:26, 27 February 2011 (UTC) 198:19:43, 27 November 2009 (UTC) 182:07:56, 25 November 2009 (UTC) 936:07:32, 26 January 2012 (UTC) 921:20:45, 17 January 2012 (UTC) 889:12:17, 26 January 2012 (UTC) 875:07:28, 26 January 2012 (UTC) 850:02:02, 26 January 2012 (UTC) 418:criteria for speedy deletion 311:00:19, 9 February 2010 (UTC) 294:23:54, 8 February 2010 (UTC) 278:21:51, 8 February 2010 (UTC) 250:11:55, 8 February 2010 (UTC) 228:20:19, 7 February 2010 (UTC) 836:19:16, 5 January 2012 (UTC) 811:23:50, 4 January 2012 (UTC) 801:most appropriate to keep.-- 796:14:54, 4 January 2012 (UTC) 780:00:37, 4 January 2012 (UTC) 707:17:35, 19 August 2011 (UTC) 691:07:06, 19 August 2011 (UTC) 449:one of these administrators 377:20:38, 17 August 2010 (UTC) 363:18:22, 15 August 2010 (UTC) 349:16:22, 15 August 2010 (UTC) 334:12:19, 15 August 2010 (UTC) 317:Bot can't handle diacritics 952: 655:23:07, 20 July 2011 (UTC) 641:17:00, 19 July 2011 (UTC) 615:16:53, 19 July 2011 (UTC) 597:14:44, 19 July 2011 (UTC) 578:13:01, 19 July 2011 (UTC) 556:08:44, 19 July 2011 (UTC) 537:23:42, 18 July 2011 (UTC) 509:15:59, 28 June 2011 (UTC) 494:15:42, 28 June 2011 (UTC) 404:A tag has been placed on 45:the big license migration 18:da:Brugerdiskussion:MGA73 256:Bot ignoring PUF and IFD 645:That should help :-) -- 911:File:Chengdupanda1.jpg 401: 266:File:ClarkdaleCrop.jpg 262:File:Coconutoiljar.jpg 400: 204:Template:Flickrreview 860:Not moved to Commons 673:Why did MGA73bot do 669:Mathis-for-wiki.jpg 208:This bot is adding 168:GFDL - not eligible 402: 943: 905:Bot malfunction? 864: 858: 739: 733: 469: 464: 459: 428: 427: 399: 217: 211: 951: 950: 946: 945: 944: 942: 941: 940: 907: 862: 856: 737: 731: 715: 671: 517: 479: 467: 462: 457: 425: 424: 414: 397: 395: 388:Speedy deletion 319: 270:IngerAlHaosului 258: 220:IngerAlHaosului 215: 209: 206: 170: 25: 12: 11: 5: 949: 947: 939: 938: 906: 903: 902: 901: 900: 899: 898: 897: 896: 895: 894: 893: 892: 891: 816: 815: 814: 813: 714: 711: 710: 709: 670: 667: 666: 665: 664: 663: 662: 661: 660: 659: 658: 657: 617: 519:I don't think 516: 513: 512: 511: 478: 475: 410: 394: 390:nomination of 385: 384: 383: 382: 381: 380: 379: 318: 315: 314: 313: 297: 296: 257: 254: 253: 252: 236: 235: 205: 202: 201: 200: 169: 166: 165: 164: 163: 162: 161: 160: 159: 158: 157: 156: 132: 131: 130: 129: 128: 127: 126: 125: 100: 99: 98: 97: 96: 95: 76: 75: 74: 73: 24: 21: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 948: 937: 933: 929: 925: 924: 923: 922: 919: 916: 912: 904: 890: 886: 882: 878: 877: 876: 872: 868: 861: 853: 852: 851: 847: 843: 839: 838: 837: 833: 829: 825: 822: 821: 820: 819: 818: 817: 812: 808: 804: 799: 798: 797: 793: 789: 784: 783: 782: 781: 777: 773: 769: 766: 763: 760: 757: 754: 751: 748: 745: 742: 736: 729: 726: 723: 719: 712: 708: 704: 700: 695: 694: 693: 692: 688: 684: 680: 676: 668: 656: 652: 648: 644: 643: 642: 638: 634: 630: 626: 622: 618: 616: 612: 608: 604: 600: 599: 598: 594: 590: 586: 581: 580: 579: 575: 571: 567: 563: 559: 558: 557: 553: 549: 545: 541: 540: 539: 538: 534: 530: 526: 522: 514: 510: 506: 502: 498: 497: 496: 495: 491: 487: 483: 476: 474: 473: 470: 465: 460: 454: 450: 445: 441: 440: 439:the talk page 435: 434: 421: 419: 413: 409: 407: 393: 389: 386: 378: 374: 370: 366: 365: 364: 360: 356: 352: 351: 350: 346: 342: 338: 337: 336: 335: 332: 328: 324: 312: 308: 304: 299: 298: 295: 291: 287: 282: 281: 280: 279: 275: 271: 267: 263: 255: 251: 247: 243: 238: 237: 232: 231: 230: 229: 225: 221: 214: 203: 199: 195: 191: 186: 185: 184: 183: 179: 175: 167: 155: 151: 147: 142: 141: 140: 139: 138: 137: 136: 135: 134: 133: 124: 120: 116: 112: 108: 107: 106: 105: 104: 103: 102: 101: 94: 90: 86: 82: 81: 80: 79: 78: 77: 72: 68: 64: 60: 59: 58: 54: 50: 46: 42: 41: 40: 39: 35: 31: 20: 19: 908: 730:) is adding 724: 721: 716: 672: 518: 480: 443: 437: 430: 422: 415: 411: 403: 320: 259: 213:Flickrreview 207: 171: 110: 26: 15: 431:the top of 426:{{hang on}} 327:Medell+â-¡n 321:On article 174:LordBelly06 735:NowCommons 585:User:MGA73 416:Under the 915:Fut.Perf. 881:GrapedApe 842:GrapedApe 803:GrapedApe 772:GrapedApe 521:this edit 482:This edit 477:Bot error 823:Running 728:contribs 718:MGA73bot 629:Drilnoth 603:Drilnoth 566:Drilnoth 525:Drilnoth 447:contact 323:Medellín 115:PDBailey 63:PDBailey 30:PDBailey 683:Zundark 486:Zundark 463:hockey 453:userfy 444:speedy 111:per se 928:MGA73 867:MGA73 828:MGA73 788:MGA73 699:MGA73 647:MGA73 589:MGA73 548:MGA73 515:Dates 501:MGA73 369:MGA73 355:MGA73 341:MGA73 331:pablo 303:MGA73 286:MGA73 242:MGA73 190:MGA73 146:MGA73 85:MGA73 49:MGA73 932:talk 885:talk 871:talk 846:talk 832:talk 807:talk 792:talk 776:talk 722:talk 703:talk 687:talk 675:this 651:talk 623:and 593:talk 552:talk 505:talk 490:talk 458:Addi 373:talk 359:talk 345:talk 307:talk 290:talk 274:talk 264:and 246:talk 224:talk 194:talk 178:talk 150:talk 119:talk 89:talk 67:talk 53:talk 34:talk 627:. – 429:to 934:) 887:) 873:) 863:}} 857:{{ 848:) 834:) 809:) 794:) 778:) 738:}} 732:{{ 705:) 689:) 653:) 639:) 613:) 595:) 576:) 554:) 535:) 507:) 492:) 468:10 375:) 361:) 347:) 309:) 292:) 284:-- 276:) 248:) 226:) 216:}} 210:{{ 196:) 188:-- 180:) 152:) 121:) 91:) 69:) 55:) 36:) 930:( 918:☼ 883:( 869:( 844:( 830:( 805:( 790:( 774:( 767:, 764:, 761:, 758:, 755:, 752:, 749:, 746:, 743:, 725:· 720:( 701:( 685:( 649:( 637:C 635:/ 633:T 631:( 611:C 609:/ 607:T 605:( 591:( 574:C 572:/ 570:T 568:( 550:( 533:C 531:/ 529:T 527:( 503:( 488:( 371:( 357:( 343:( 305:( 288:( 272:( 244:( 222:( 192:( 176:( 148:( 117:( 87:( 65:( 51:( 32:(

Index

da:Brugerdiskussion:MGA73
PDBailey
talk
16:04, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
the big license migration
MGA73
talk
20:06, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
PDBailey
talk
20:19, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
MGA73
talk
20:50, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
PDBailey
talk
21:16, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
MGA73
talk
08:55, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
LordBelly06
talk
07:56, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
MGA73
talk
19:43, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
Flickrreview
IngerAlHaosului
talk
20:19, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.