User talk:MILH - Knowledge (XXG)

612:

we don't know that St. George's College is a prep school (High School). We don't know that Jose Miguel Carrera was a founding-farther of Chile. Is it really relevant for a living person to have genealogical pedigree several generations in the past? I am related to several famous people but I don't list those people on my biography. We don't know what Lira's primary degree is. It happens to be a bachelors degree. A doctoral degree or even a masters being more of a credential. As written a reader gleams the false impression that he has a bachelors and a masters degree! There is an improvement in chronology which comes at the cost of continuity. (three books, one film, a a few opinion pieces). Do you list the books, film, and opinion pieces or the chronology. I personally feel that listing like credentials together by date would be firmer. Eponymous is "a person giving his name to something" as endorsement. His blog is self authored! Editorially, This would be the same thing as saying that "The peas on menu are tasty, when in fact they are just peas." The approach of the entry in total is self aggrandizement which is not acceptable. The linked source of the blog counter requires establishment of an id and password, If we were talking about statistics for Knowledge (XXG), a top site on the internet, then supporting statistics would be warranted. Here they are not. The linked source is "marketing" of a live person to provide credibility where there is none. Opinion pieces would be more accurate to describe his participation in Internet based media outlets. Continuity in blogging appears to be sporadic both in 2010 also in early 2014. I cannot imagine his blog being a vocation of any kind. Frankly I don't see a vocation of any kind. I see a few credentials of little merit over three disparate fields. I am being intentionally harsh, as people can self learn or switch fields, what I am not seeing is an expert in any field or a renaissance man capable of excellence in any one field. A factual chronology lets the reader draw the conclusion. It would be better to list Gonzola Lira followed by a supportable chronology and then let the reader decide if he is author (of three books few have read), a film maker (of a single film few people have seen), or a pundit on media outlets (few people pay attention to). Those are my conclusions trying to research the substance behind the hype after going to every link on this entry. Who am I to judge! If the fellow was a commentator on CNBC I might use the word Pundit. Factually, I was a guest on CNBC and I am not a pundit or guru. Unfortunately, pundit is similar to guru and lacks professionalism. A key point in 2014 is whether or not his opinions materialized to fact. In 2014 we have a statement by Lira reiterating his opinion of 2010, I think this is more relevant. The 2014 reiteration of a 2010 opinion means that he still has confidence that his prediction will come to fruition. By having a chronology of the lynchpin prediction we establish a track record while at the same time acknowledging that what he has to say is both relevant and possible. These kinds of opinion pieces are dangerous because they remain operable until disproven. This is the ways conspiracy theories work whereby a position gets put forth that becomes impossible to disprove. Additionally, what was popular in 2010 is not popular today as it relates to Lira. The initial prediction and follow on result (which is a reiteration on his part) is more relevant. There is a bias in puffing up a live person

111:

satisfies the other editor(s). (My own knowledge of Pinochet and Chilean politics is amateur at best, so I don't know which is better.) You can revert changes by going to page history, clicking on the last version you think is acceptable, clicking "edit page", and saving -- but this is a bad idea in content disputes, because once "edit wars" start they are very hard to stop, and the community takes a dim view of them unless they involve clear vandalism. Make your case on the talk page and wait for someone else knowledgeable about the topic to chime in. Oh--another thing you can do is look through the article history to see who the main authors of the article were, and contact them for their opinions. Cheers!

1354:

removed the references to econ punditry Lira carried out, since there were "no citations". The same with Lira's econ writing, which had a significant impact in 2010–2012, but which Keithbob has (again) de-referenced and replaced with a "citation needed". My guess is, soon enough, those references to Lira's econ writing will also be eliminated.Thus Keithbob is deliberately denigrating Lira, so as to create the appearance that the subject is non-notable, and thus deserves to be removed from Knowledge (XXG). I am unclear as to why Keithbob seems eager to vanish Lira from Knowledge (XXG). Nevertheless, that is what he/she is doing.

1015:

Adding bare addresses creates unprofessional look to the article. Take your time, you are part of a project here-and to call my actions churlish- you need to realize that when you say that to someone who is just trying to improve wp, you may in fact cause them to become rude; people don't appreciate unnecessary comments like that.If you remember you are interacting with other human beings, you may suddenly find that editing, and life, have become easier for you.

961: 436:. Although contrary to BLP policy, their edits are a good faith attempt to improve the article. The edits are not vandalism on Knowledge (XXG) and the editor should not be described as such. Please consider refactoring the post you left on the article talk page and avoid calling the IP such terms in the future. It does a lot to try to defuse a situation. As it is, the IP is using similar language back towards you. 878: 1550: 1418: 1305: 1088: 1382:

don't think it's fair. (I've noticed Keithbob does the same to other entries; his criteria seems to be that if he isn't aware of someone/something, then it isn't notable, and hence should be deleted from WP.) But whenever I try to roll back what he's doing, Keithbob is more aggressive in his cuts—and then attacks me.

409:

As a note for the future, you need to leave polite messages (either custom or using the templates) on the IP's talk page, informing and warning about the 3RR limit. You should also create a talk page section and push the IP to edit there. I've left the warning, thank you for the talk page edit. If

611:

Res Ipsa loquitur - it speaks for itself, that by listing a resume-like-chronology, the profession will be inferred by the reader especially since there are "three attempts at professions" it cannot be assumed by the writer that any of them are meaningful or have continuity. With the revisions

1131:

User Lfrankbalm has been trolling this entry under anonymous IP addresses, Special:Contributions/173.68.144.130|173.68.144.130, User talk:173.68.144.130, (which eventually led to his being banned), and IP address 200.73.224.212. User Lfrankbalm has a clear personal animus towards the subject. Hence

1014:

anything. I have no idea who this guy is. And the purpose of Knowledge (XXG) is so I can go and find out more about him if I needed to. And If I did, I would like to know where this information came from. It's good that you added those sources, but if you're going to, you need to add them properly.

899:

The allegation that an editor with whom you have a content dispute is engaging in vandalism is a personal attack, and a serious one. Content disputes are not vandalism. If you have been in Knowledge (XXG) long enough to know what vandalism is, you have been in Knowledge (XXG) long enough to know

631:

Starting in 2010, Lira's economic and political opinion pieces were prominently featured within blogs such as Zero Hedge, Naked Capitalism, Seeking Alpha, Jim Puplava's Financial Sense Newshour, and Business Insider; Lira appeared on Russia Today in January 2014 whereby he reiterated his popularly

517:

Hi MILH, thank you for taking the time to file a request for mediation. Unfortunately this isn't a suitable case for mediation. When an obvious violation happens, there are several steps you can take. As Bbb23 points out, above, it is a good idea to mark the violation in the edit summary when you

1381:

Keithbob wants to delete Lira as non-notable. He's doing it by removing the things that the man has actually and verifiably done, and by denigrating/downgrading things he's done until they're practically trivial—and hence make his entry worthy for deletion from WP. I don't know what to do—I also

145:

Yes, it's one of those sentences that has been in the article for a while, but... I don't think anyone knows what to do with it because it's been in that section for so long, and there's no other place for it because the other headings are just so damned specific. No idea really, but I think the

1353:

User Keithbob does not want to include that information. He's removed it multiple times. As to Lira being a pundit on television talk shows, there were several cited references to appearances he made. Keithbob removed them, and replaced those references with a "citation needed". Later, Keithbob

1181:

This entry has been consistently vandalized by an individual going by the name User:Lfrankbalm|Lfrankbalm, IP addresses 96.232.195.162, 173.68.144.130, and now 96.232.195.162. All three of these anonymous IP addresses came from the New York area, and were on the Verizon network. The diction and

618:

Gonzalo Lira (born February 29, 1968) is a Chilean-American with genealogical ties to one of the founding fathers of Chile, José Miguel Carrera. In 1985 Lira obtained a preparatory education at St. George's College Chile and in 1995 he graduated from Dartmouth College with a bachelors degree in

149:

The article still needs a lot of work, glad you've taken interest in it, because I've really lost mine with some people with their bickering "this shouldn't be included", and "this shouldn't look like that". It's a lot better than it was, but God it could be a lot better and more professional.

110:

Greetings again. I looked briefly at the changes at Pinochet. While it's a rather severe cut, it's a content dispute with another editor, so your best bet is to discuss it on the talk page and attempt to achieve consensus on restoring all or part of your version, or a rewritten version which

1174:

User Lfrankbalm has been trolling this entry under anonymous IP addresses (which eventually led to his being banned), and IP address 200.73.224.212. User Lfrankbalm has a clear personal animus towards the subject. Hence I've been patrolling his edits, which he has made under the guise of

1061:

you made a personal attack on another editor which is forbidden. So a friendly alert and request to please refrain from this kind of behavior in future when interacting with other editors. Thanks. I look forward to working together to expand and improve WP articles and the project.

951:"Policy does not prohibit users, whether registered or unregistered users, from removing comments from their own talk pages, although archiving is preferred. The removal of material from a user page is normally taken to mean that the user has read and is aware of its contents." 1308:

Please stop your disruptive behaviour. Your behaviour is verging on harassment. Knowledge (XXG) prides itself on providing a safe environment for its collaborators, and harassing edits potentially compromise that safe environment. If you continue behaving like this, you may be

662:---Pundit would be an opinion. We don't have a degree in the field. We have three career chronologies. We don't have an opinion confirmed in fact, or better yet a set of them confirmed in fact. What we have are opinions with yours being just as good as his. 1576:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

1214:

Just because you suspect that someone who you are in a content dispute with is a sock puppet does not make it so. It also does not give you the right to attack, harass and make threats on an editor's talk page. If you suspect sock puppetry then file a case at

1444:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

1209:

seem to hate Lira. I'm keeping up this article because I read his Spanish-language novel, and have been following his career ever since. If you keep on vandalizing his entry, or sock-puppeting, I'll see to it that you are banned like the last

1204:

are the troll who's been sock-puppeting with IP address 98.113.143.89, 173.68.144.130, and 96.232.195.162. You were already banned when you used the 98.113.143.89 address. You vandalized the entry when using the 96.232.195.162 address. You

1056:

Hi MILH and welcome to WP. You are a new editor so you may not be fully aware of all of WPs policies and procedures. There are hundreds of them and it takes time to absorb them. One policy is regarding civility and personal attacks. In

1230:

on the talk pages using WP guidelines as reference points and making decisions via consensus. Please read the guidelines that I have cited so you can have a better understanding of the behavioral requirements and procedures for WP.

129:

Yeah, I just put them together because it looked neater and more worked on. I thought this because the Legacy was really short and not expanded much, but influences was, so I just combined them. It's perfectly fine split up though.

822:

Few changes need made to Lira so that it would find NPOV and these changes are not too great Suggest you consider the notes on the talk and take a step back from ownership and bias Best if you made the revisions, be a good sport

635:

I would suggest that it be reverted back to the above. As a long time Knowledge (XXG) reader, this is not a quality article as written. It detracts from the confidence I would have on the basis of neutrality and objectiveness.

1036:

I'm sorry about that note I left, I had a dreadful day; And the word churlish doesn't sound so bad to me today as it did last night; It was the tiny dab of icing on the cake for me, and set me off. I just feel like a dolt now.

93:

Greetings! I do a lot of vandalism patrol when I'm otherwise unoccupied, and this morning a kid from Jefferson County Public Schools (Wheat Ridge, Colorado, 204.98.2.30) was targeting the Pinochet article with stuff like this

522:

on the individual's talk page. This helps other users to know that the individual is repeating a violation. Another action to take if the situation continues to be repeated might be to report the violation on the appropriate

1167:

seem to hate Lira. I'm keeping up this article because I read his Spanish-language novel, and have been following his career ever since. If you keep on vandalizing his entry, I'll see to it that you are banned like the last

1152:

1319:

talk page. Instead you have been attacking and harassing anyone who attempts to edit the article in accordance with WP policies and guidelines. Despite repeated requests and warnings you are now focusing your attacks on me

1580:

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

1448:

1505:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 931:

you should divest them in that discussion. WP is a medium of consensus, so any edits or reverts from here on should be discussed, each item and it's source. I hope I can help you both to come to some type of

1194:

Don't even think of deleting this warning—as you did before—as I'll not only revert your deletion, but I'll also inform admins of what you're pulling and see to it that you are banned for good. Agreed?

301:

I have no problem with your "undisputed facts" as long as you can provide unbiased sources of information to validate them. Knowledge (XXG) doesn't care about original research or personal opinions. ☆

740:---Whatever the word used "eponymous" or otherwise, out of the three people editing the Lira entry, you are the only one that thinks an entry citing a web site counter it is appropriate in this case 622:

Lira authored three novels, Counterparts a commercial thriller published in 1997, Tomáh Errázurih a coming-of-age story published in 1998, and 'Acrobat, another commercial thriller in 2002.

1182:

spelling mistakes are similar in all four of these "people". All four of these "people" have a serious dislike for the subject of this entry. Just putting this here for future reference.

1573: 260:

If you continue with this libel, and if you continue to eliminate information that is accurate but which you do not care for, I will be forced to formally notify an administrator.

675:---You added a marketing line back regarding "eponymous" blog. " There is consensus that is not correct.. The blog in question is not named after it; it is written by him. 361:

has received a request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to "Gonzalo Lira". As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation.

894: 524: 773:"Are you related to Lira?" "Are you from Chile?" "Are you a gold-bug?" "Are you a libertarian?" "Do you listen to alternate news?" "Do you have a conflict of interest? 296:

Most seriously of all, you have eliminated objective, undisputed facts, apparentley because you do not like the political inference that can be drawn from said information.

519: 1470:

Several editors have tried to caution you about your edits. Please try to listen to them. I don't think that you want to blocked from editing as a disruptive editor.

365:

is a voluntary process which resolves a dispute over article content by facilitation, consensus-building, and compromise among the involved editors. After reviewing the

1219:. As for having a bias, other editors may feel the same way about you, so keep your opinions of bias to yourself. Lastly, speculating about a users real life identity 560: 366: 1441: 640:

I see that there was some sort of revision war here which was inappropriate. However, There are factual reasons as to why the entry on Lira needs to be revised.

170:

I don't know about Pinochet, so I wouldn't be able to tell about cover up and real truth. If you tell me where to look, etc... I might be able to help you more.

1188:

Confirmed troll with personal animus towards the subject of the entry. Has used multiple anonymous IP sock puppets to vandalize entry. Am undoing his/her edits.

981:

You will find that I have outlined what changes might need to be made to the Lira biography. I welcome your response and input to the points outlined within.

1562: 1430: 967: 960: 924: 278:

I have tried to solve these disputes in a civil manner. You have rejected my offer of civility, and instead have chosen an aggressive, libelous attitude.

65: 468:

MILH, here's some advice for the future. I didn't block you for edit warring in the Lira article because I found the IP's edit to be a straightforward

615:

By far this would be the cleanest, unbiased, and most neutral biography; (I am not harsh here because my opinions about Lira don't not count! NPOV)

1103:

After doing a little further research I see that you have a history of personal attacks and threats including two attacks made after you were warned

556: 374: 49: 97:. I usually just hit "rollback" and block the offender after they've been warned a couple times. Welcome to Knowledge (XXG), and happy editing! 370: 707:---The date range from 2010-2012 omits a follow on RT. But there is little continuity in this activity.. Date range was factually wrong. 651:

I felt it was professional to let you know. From what I can tell you have "owned" the revision history of this entry to the detriment of NPOV.

325:

article. Because you are a new user, I will not report this violation, but be aware that if you violate this rule again, I will report it. ☆

25:

to Knowledge (XXG)! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

1530: 804: 796: 716: 708: 684: 676: 283:

How civil it is to not respond to my numerous requests to solve this in Talk? You only seem to care about reverting without discussing. ☆

476:. However, next time, mark your reverts as BLP violations so it's clear that's your motive. In addition, I would have taken the issue to 224:

You are deliberately trying to smear my reputation because you do not like the undisputed facts that I am including in certain articles.

552: 321:

that blocks users who revert an article more than three times within 24 hours. I've noticed that you have violated this rule in the

381:

Because requests must be responded to by the Mediation Committee within seven days, please respond to the request by 13 July 2014.

1092: 882: 597: 564: 396: 358: 185: 1526: 974: 572: 34: 22: 563:, which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time. Please direct questions relating to this request to the 1226:

and is strictly prohibited on WP. This is a collaborative volunteer project and we assume good faith and discuss issues of

206:

I included the undisputed fact that Bachelet can speak some Russian and can read Cyrillic, and you are calling it vandalism.

68:

on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out

146:

article could use another face lift. Not to brag, but you should have seen it before I gave it the look it has right now.

1138:

You keep eliminating factually accurate information, apparently because you have a bias against the subject. Please cease.

1125:

You keep eliminating factually accurate information, apparently because you have a bias against the subject. Please cease.

1566: 1517:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to

1434: 1311: 1096: 54: 1522: 768:---The issue of no clear vocation is not addressed, another area that needs to be decided by a reader of a NPOV entry 847:

Minimal changes as of September 29th. Lets close this issue and concern with these changes as documented in talk.

778:---Ancestry might be important to cite, just not here where it is irrelevant except to the ego of a living person. 1475: 906: 327: 303: 285: 267: 249: 231: 213: 190: 759:---This mistake is easy to prove, but you think your phraseology is correct when weighed against clarity of fact 29: 808: 800: 720: 712: 688: 680: 568: 322: 1315:. You are a single purpose account who refuses to engage in meaningful discussion with other editors on the 61: 1042: 1022: 937: 571:. For more information on forms of dispute resolution, other than formal mediation, that are available, see 1379:

And another personal attack (allegations with no diffs) posted on the talk page of another user: Oct 20 -

1586: 927:. I have no opinion either way on this matter. I suggest that before you make any reverts or additions on 632:

read 2010 assertion in Zerohedge that hyper-inflation would eventually cause the demise of the US dollar.

628:

Lira co-wrote, produced and directed the film Catalina’s Kidnapping, a Spanish language thriller in 2006.

392: 211:

I said it was an irrelevant fact for an encyclopedia article. And other editors seems to agree with me. ☆

1557: 1541: 1518: 433: 362: 69: 44: 1471: 996: 988: 902: 862: 854: 838: 830: 443: 421: 1494: 1485: 115: 101: 1514: 1498: 1223: 1455: 1395: 1367: 1339: 1260: 1242: 1073: 1038: 1018: 933: 1116: 928: 473: 76:

on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --

559:. To read an explanation by the Mediation Committee for the rejection of this request, see the 1582: 1289: 1163:

are the troll who's been sock-puppeting with IP address 98.113.143.89 and 173.68.144.130. You

1148:

are the troll who's been sock-puppeting with IP address 98.113.143.89 and 173.68.144.130. You

593: 388: 153:

Ever read Flann O'Brien's "The Third Policeman"? Just wondering, good book, got it yesterday.

1510: 1502: 784:---I am going to maintain the moral high ground thus I am not going to change the entry back. 477: 648: 583: 532: 1513:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 1506: 1281: 1216: 1112: 1108: 787:---I don't care what you think of Lira (or what I think of him) the bio needs to be neutral 481: 469: 458: 411: 318: 992: 984: 858: 850: 834: 826: 489: 437: 415: 341:

Which is the problem if she can speak russian ? our president not even speak english :-))

518:

revert. Another action (and here I'm repeating Ravensfire's comment) would be to place a

384:

Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page. Thank you.

1280:

I have reverted your recent edit. Please do not edit war. Per the principles set out at

242:

I have also noted that you have been tampering with discussion entries of other editors.

432:

Something else - please try to avoid calling them a troll or describing their edits as

133:

Yeah, like they say, learn something new every day. Glad you added that. Take it easy.

112: 98: 1450: 1387: 1359: 1331: 1252: 1234: 1065: 893:, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please 265:

Actually I was thinking about contacting an administrator myself. Please go ahead. ☆

39: 1425: 1409: 1316: 1285: 1274: 886: 462: 877: 379:

please indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate.

765:---We know he just has a Bachelors degree and the readers of this biography don't 749:---Suggesting he is "well respected" lacks NPOV and that is the whole point. ' 1324:

Please stop the harassment and limit your posts to discussion of content on the

579: 528: 171: 156: 134: 77: 527:. I note that the individual has now been blocked. All's well that ends well. 485: 342: 790:--- I will open this discussion up to others on the NPOV and other moderation 647:

I just wanted to give you a heads up that I escalated my concern to Sunray;

500: 1351:

And now this personal attack against me on the article talk page: Oct 19 -

625:

In 2000, Lira was a story consultant on the video game Soldier of Fortune.

1132:

I've been patrolling his edits, which he has made under the guise of NPOV.

952: 1501:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge (XXG)

746:---Lira's blog is not independent - It is his blog and that lacks NPOV. 555:

concerning Gonzalo Lira, to which you were listed as a party, has been

1321: 1119:. Here is a listing of the personal attacks which I am referencing: 1590: 1534: 1479: 1460: 1402: 1374: 1346: 1293: 1267: 1080: 1046: 1026: 1000: 941: 910: 866: 842: 812: 724: 692: 587: 536: 508: 493: 449: 427: 400: 345: 331: 307: 289: 271: 253: 235: 217: 194: 118: 104: 80: 756:---The date range which you restored is incorrect "From 2010-12 607:

Gonzolo Lira - Need for a Rewrite in Total, Issues and Concerns

762:---The issue of a College being a high-school is not addressed 977:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

959: 229:

Can you please prove how I am "smearing your reputation"? ☆

1010:

You must understand that neither I, nor most other editors

968:

Knowledge (XXG):Dispute_resolution_noticeboard#Gonzalo Lira

167:

Yeah, the Third Policeman is good, weird, but really good.

1561:

is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge (XXG) according to

1429:

is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge (XXG) according to

947:

My perspective on the changes that need to be made re Lira

1574:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Trident Media Group

956:

As far as I am concerned the issues can be solved here

1284:

please join the discussion on the article's talk page.--

410:

they do continue to revert as is, I'll file a report on

1555:

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

1423:

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

1380: 1352: 1299:

Final Warning: Stop the personal attacks and harassment

1220: 1199: 1193: 1187: 1180: 1173: 1158: 1143: 1137: 1130: 1124: 1104: 1058: 182: 95: 1107:

by User Robert McClenon. Please be careful and read

1442:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Gonzalo Lira 1493:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current 923:Hello, I've opened the dispute for Gonzalo Lira 753:facts being something from a quality third party 751:Put the facts forth and have the reader decide, 715:) 21:08, 23 September 2014 (UTC)173.68.144.130 683:) 21:08, 23 September 2014 (UTC)173.68.144.130 803:) 18:48, 24 September 2014 (UTC)173.68.144.13 484:. This is not a content dispute. Take care.-- 8: 781:---I would like to see this bio from an NPOV 1095:other editors. If you continue, you may be 472:violation. Therefore, your reversions were 991:) 23:20, 30 September 2014 (UTC)lfrankbalm 857:) 18:04, 29 September 2014 (UTC)lfrankbalm 833:) 02:27, 26 September 2014 (UTC)lfrankbalm 60:I hope you enjoy editing here and being a 1563:Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines 1431:Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines 1328:talk page. This is your final warning.-- 247:Can you please provide proof of this? ☆ 966:Hello, MILH. You have new messages at 897:and keep this in mind while editing. 7: 775:If you answered yes to any question. 414:and let them handle it from there. 351:Formal mediation has been requested 72:, ask me on my talk page, or place 30:The five pillars of Knowledge (XXG) 573:Knowledge (XXG):Dispute resolution 14: 1572:The article will be discussed at 1519:review the candidates' statements 1440:The article will be discussed at 1548: 1416: 1303: 1086: 876: 317:Please be aware that there is a 743:---You are violating consensus! 1525:. For the Election committee, 1495:Arbitration Committee election 1486:ArbCom elections are now open! 1249:18:33, 16 October 2014 (UTC)-- 1001:23:20, 30 September 2014 (UTC) 942:06:16, 30 September 2014 (UTC) 911:23:27, 29 September 2014 (UTC) 867:18:04, 29 September 2014 (UTC) 843:02:27, 26 September 2014 (UTC) 813:18:48, 24 September 2014 (UTC) 725:21:08, 23 September 2014 (UTC) 693:21:08, 23 September 2014 (UTC) 545:Request for mediation rejected 1: 1535:13:50, 23 November 2015 (UTC) 1099:from editing Knowledge (XXG). 885:other editors, as you did on 578:For the Mediation Committee, 1480:02:56, 22 October 2014 (UTC) 1461:19:26, 20 October 2014 (UTC) 1403:02:37, 22 October 2014 (UTC) 1375:15:23, 20 October 2014 (UTC) 1347:15:02, 20 October 2014 (UTC) 1294:13:33, 17 October 2014 (UTC) 1268:13:32, 17 October 2014 (UTC) 1081:19:59, 12 October 2014 (UTC) 567:of the Committee, or to the 553:request for formal mediation 399:of the Mediation Committee. 200:Re: "First and only warning" 50:How to write a great article 1591:08:19, 3 January 2020 (UTC) 1521:and submit your choices on 1047:21:40, 3 October 2014 (UTC) 1027:03:17, 3 October 2014 (UTC) 525:administrators' noticeboard 1606: 1527:MediaWiki message delivery 81:21:58, 16 April 2006 (UTC) 600:the Mediation Committee.) 499:Good to know, thank you. 375:guide to formal mediation 346:11:26, 25 June 2006 (UTC) 70:Knowledge (XXG):Questions 1565:or whether it should be 1433:or whether it should be 1006:Your recent edit re lira 619:history and philosophy. 588:01:05, 7 July 2014 (UTC) 537:00:57, 7 July 2014 (UTC) 509:19:58, 6 July 2014 (UTC) 504: 494:19:53, 6 July 2014 (UTC) 450:16:49, 6 July 2014 (UTC) 428:16:45, 6 July 2014 (UTC) 401:01:45, 6 July 2014 (UTC) 332:15:39, 28 May 2006 (UTC) 323:Alejandrina Cox incident 308:23:07, 27 May 2006 (UTC) 290:23:07, 27 May 2006 (UTC) 272:23:07, 27 May 2006 (UTC) 254:23:07, 27 May 2006 (UTC) 236:23:07, 27 May 2006 (UTC) 218:23:07, 27 May 2006 (UTC) 195:19:53, 25 May 2006 (UTC) 119:15:01, 24 May 2006 (UTC) 105:18:04, 22 May 2006 (UTC) 371:formal mediation policy 163:Third Policeman, etc... 1322:via my user talk page. 1032:Response to your reply 964: 900:what is not vandalism. 818:Lira - Not too far off 771:---I have to ask this 561:mediation request page 319:Knowledge (XXG) policy 1499:Arbitration Committee 1466:Caution on 22 October 1198:22:53 September 30th 1192:22:55 September 30th 963: 919:Moderation of dispute 387:Message delivered by 1312:blocked from editing 125:Legacy and Influence 1558:Trident Media Group 1542:Trident Media Group 1503:arbitration process 1157:14:05 September 25 1142:14:04 September 25 359:Mediation Committee 186:no personal attacks 1515:arbitration policy 975:remove this notice 965: 137:May 24 2006 10:04 35:How to edit a page 1105:here on Sept 29th 601: 403: 174:May 25 2006 8:27 21:Hello, MILH, and 1597: 1552: 1551: 1458: 1453: 1420: 1419: 1401: 1398: 1373: 1370: 1345: 1342: 1307: 1306: 1266: 1263: 1248: 1245: 1090: 1089: 1079: 1076: 978: 880: 591: 446: 424: 386: 313:Tree revert rule 75: 1605: 1604: 1600: 1599: 1598: 1596: 1595: 1594: 1553: 1549: 1546: 1523:the voting page 1489: 1472:Robert McClenon 1468: 1456: 1451: 1421: 1417: 1414: 1396: 1385: 1368: 1357: 1340: 1329: 1304: 1301: 1278: 1261: 1250: 1243: 1232: 1172:September 26 – 1087: 1074: 1063: 1054: 1052:Personal attack 1034: 1008: 979: 972: 949: 921: 903:Robert McClenon 874: 820: 609: 604: 603: 576: 547: 466: 444: 422: 406: 405: 382: 353: 339: 328:CieloEstrellado 315: 304:CieloEstrellado 286:CieloEstrellado 268:CieloEstrellado 250:CieloEstrellado 232:CieloEstrellado 214:CieloEstrellado 202: 191:CieloEstrellado 180: 165: 143: 127: 91: 73: 55:Manual of Style 12: 11: 5: 1603: 1601: 1547: 1545: 1540:Nomination of 1538: 1492: 1488: 1483: 1467: 1464: 1415: 1413: 1408:Nomination of 1406: 1300: 1297: 1277: 1272: 1271: 1270: 1212: 1196: 1190: 1184: 1177: 1170: 1155: 1140: 1134: 1127: 1101: 1100: 1093:stop attacking 1053: 1050: 1033: 1030: 1016: 1007: 1004: 971: 958: 948: 945: 920: 917: 915: 881:Please do not 873: 872:September 2014 870: 819: 816: 805:173.68.144.130 797:173.68.144.130 794: 793: 792: 791: 788: 785: 782: 779: 776: 769: 766: 763: 760: 757: 754: 747: 744: 741: 734: 732: 731: 730: 729: 728: 727: 717:173.68.144.130 709:173.68.144.130 700: 699: 698: 697: 696: 695: 685:173.68.144.130 677:173.68.144.130 668: 667: 666: 665: 664: 663: 655: 654: 653: 652: 649:NPOV - Request 642: 641: 608: 605: 592:(Delivered by 590: 550: 549: 548: 546: 543: 542: 541: 540: 539: 512: 511: 465: 456: 455: 454: 453: 452: 385: 356: 355: 354: 352: 349: 338: 335: 314: 311: 299: 298: 281: 280: 263: 262: 245: 244: 227: 226: 209: 208: 201: 198: 179: 176: 164: 161: 142: 139: 126: 123: 122: 121: 90: 87: 85: 66:sign your name 58: 57: 52: 47: 42: 37: 32: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1602: 1593: 1592: 1588: 1584: 1578: 1575: 1570: 1568: 1564: 1560: 1559: 1543: 1539: 1537: 1536: 1532: 1528: 1524: 1520: 1516: 1512: 1508: 1504: 1500: 1496: 1487: 1484: 1482: 1481: 1477: 1473: 1465: 1463: 1462: 1459: 1454: 1446: 1443: 1438: 1436: 1432: 1428: 1427: 1411: 1407: 1405: 1404: 1399: 1393: 1392: 1391: 1383: 1377: 1376: 1371: 1365: 1364: 1363: 1355: 1349: 1348: 1343: 1337: 1336: 1335: 1327: 1323: 1318: 1314: 1313: 1298: 1296: 1295: 1291: 1287: 1283: 1276: 1273: 1269: 1264: 1258: 1257: 1256: 1246: 1240: 1239: 1238: 1229: 1225: 1221: 1218: 1213: 1211: 1208: 1203: 1197: 1195: 1191: 1189: 1186:September 29 1185: 1183: 1179:September 27 1178: 1176: 1171: 1169: 1166: 1162: 1156: 1154: 1151: 1147: 1141: 1139: 1136:September 25 1135: 1133: 1129:September 24 1128: 1126: 1123:September 24 1122: 1121: 1120: 1118: 1114: 1110: 1106: 1098: 1094: 1085: 1084: 1083: 1082: 1077: 1071: 1070: 1069: 1060: 1051: 1049: 1048: 1044: 1040: 1039:JacobiJonesJr 1031: 1029: 1028: 1024: 1020: 1019:JacobiJonesJr 1013: 1005: 1003: 1002: 998: 994: 990: 986: 982: 976: 969: 962: 957: 954: 953: 946: 944: 943: 939: 935: 934:JacobiJonesJr 930: 926: 918: 916: 913: 912: 908: 904: 901: 896: 892: 889:. Comment on 888: 884: 879: 871: 869: 868: 864: 860: 856: 852: 848: 845: 844: 840: 836: 832: 828: 824: 817: 815: 814: 810: 806: 802: 798: 789: 786: 783: 780: 777: 774: 770: 767: 764: 761: 758: 755: 752: 748: 745: 742: 739: 738: 737: 736: 735: 726: 722: 718: 714: 710: 706: 705: 704: 703: 702: 701: 694: 690: 686: 682: 678: 674: 673: 672: 671: 670: 669: 661: 660: 659: 658: 657: 656: 650: 646: 645: 644: 643: 639: 638: 637: 633: 629: 626: 623: 620: 616: 613: 606: 602: 599: 595: 589: 585: 581: 574: 570: 566: 562: 558: 554: 544: 538: 534: 530: 526: 521: 516: 515: 514: 513: 510: 506: 502: 498: 497: 496: 495: 491: 487: 483: 479: 475: 471: 464: 460: 457: 451: 447: 441: 440: 435: 431: 430: 429: 425: 419: 418: 413: 408: 407: 404: 402: 398: 394: 390: 380: 376: 372: 368: 364: 360: 350: 348: 347: 344: 336: 334: 333: 330: 329: 324: 320: 312: 310: 309: 306: 305: 297: 294: 293: 292: 291: 288: 287: 279: 276: 275: 274: 273: 270: 269: 261: 258: 257: 256: 255: 252: 251: 243: 240: 239: 238: 237: 234: 233: 225: 222: 221: 220: 219: 216: 215: 207: 204: 203: 199: 197: 196: 193: 192: 187: 183: 177: 175: 173: 168: 162: 160: 158: 154: 151: 147: 140: 138: 136: 131: 124: 120: 117: 114: 109: 108: 107: 106: 103: 100: 96: 88: 86: 83: 82: 79: 71: 67: 63: 56: 53: 51: 48: 46: 43: 41: 38: 36: 33: 31: 28: 27: 26: 24: 19: 18: 1583:Clarityfiend 1579: 1571: 1556: 1554: 1544:for deletion 1490: 1469: 1447: 1439: 1426:Gonzalo Lira 1424: 1422: 1412:for deletion 1410:Gonzalo Lira 1389: 1388: 1378: 1361: 1360: 1350: 1333: 1332: 1325: 1317:Gonzalo Lira 1310: 1302: 1279: 1275:Gonzalo Lira 1254: 1253: 1236: 1235: 1228:content only 1227: 1210:time—agreed? 1206: 1201: 1168:time—agreed? 1164: 1160: 1153:time—agreed? 1149: 1145: 1102: 1067: 1066: 1055: 1035: 1011: 1009: 983: 980: 955: 950: 922: 914: 898: 890: 887:Gonzalo Lira 875: 849: 846: 825: 821: 795: 772: 750: 733: 634: 630: 627: 624: 621: 617: 614: 610: 598:on behalf of 594:MediationBot 577: 569:mailing list 467: 463:Gonzalo Lira 438: 416: 389:MediationBot 383: 378: 367:request page 340: 326: 316: 302: 300: 295: 284: 282: 277: 266: 264: 259: 248: 246: 241: 230: 228: 223: 212: 210: 205: 189: 181: 178:Saint George 169: 166: 155: 152: 148: 144: 132: 128: 92: 84: 59: 20: 16: 15: 1511:topic bans 1222:is called 1017:Take care 993:Lfrankbalm 985:Lfrankbalm 932:agreement. 929:Gonzo Lira 859:Lfrankbalm 851:Lfrankbalm 835:Lfrankbalm 827:Lfrankbalm 439:Ravensfire 417:Ravensfire 373:, and the 113:Antandrus 99:Antandrus 74:{{helpme}} 62:Wikipedian 40:Help pages 1507:site bans 1231:Thanks.-- 1224:WP:OUTING 1062:Cheers!-- 1059:this edit 895:stay cool 480:, not to 434:vandalism 363:Mediation 64:! Please 1390:Keithbob 1362:Keithbob 1334:Keithbob 1255:Keithbob 1237:Keithbob 1117:WP:CIVIL 1068:Keithbob 973:You can 565:Chairman 557:declined 337:Bachelet 184:Please, 89:Pinochet 45:Tutorial 17:Welcome! 1567:deleted 1435:deleted 1326:article 1286:ukexpat 1097:blocked 1091:Please 891:content 520:warning 478:WP:BLPN 23:welcome 1497:. The 1457:Faddle 1452:Fiddle 1282:WP:BRD 1217:WP:SPI 1207:really 1165:really 1150:really 1113:WP:NPA 1109:WP:AGF 883:attack 580:Sunray 529:Sunray 482:WP:RFM 474:exempt 470:WP:BLP 459:WP:AN3 412:WP:EWN 397:behalf 369:, the 172:willsy 159:10:37 157:willsy 135:willsy 116:(talk) 102:(talk) 78:Kf4bdy 1175:NPOV. 486:Bbb23 395:) on 343:Jor70 141:Quote 1587:talk 1531:talk 1476:talk 1397:Talk 1369:Talk 1341:Talk 1290:talk 1262:Talk 1244:Talk 1115:and 1075:Talk 1043:talk 1023:talk 1012:deny 997:talk 989:talk 938:talk 925:here 907:talk 863:talk 855:talk 839:talk 831:talk 809:talk 801:talk 721:talk 713:talk 689:talk 681:talk 584:talk 551:The 533:talk 505:talk 501:MILH 490:talk 461:and 445:talk 423:talk 393:talk 357:The 188:. ☆ 1491:Hi, 1202:you 1200:So 1161:you 1159:So 1146:you 1144:So 1589:) 1569:. 1533:) 1509:, 1478:) 1437:. 1400:• 1394:• 1386:— 1384:-- 1372:• 1366:• 1358:— 1356:-- 1344:• 1338:• 1330:— 1292:) 1265:• 1259:• 1251:— 1247:• 1241:• 1233:— 1111:. 1078:• 1072:• 1064:— 1045:) 1025:) 999:) 940:) 909:) 865:) 841:) 811:) 723:) 691:) 596:, 586:) 575:. 535:) 507:) 492:) 448:) 426:) 377:, 1585:( 1529:( 1474:( 1288:( 1041:( 1021:( 995:( 987:( 970:. 936:( 905:( 861:( 853:( 837:( 829:( 807:( 799:( 719:( 711:( 687:( 679:( 582:( 531:( 503:( 488:( 442:( 420:( 391:(

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index