131:
allegations, and inflammatory ones at that. How is my splicing the article to retain its legal integrity considered vandalism? Or is
Knowledge actively gunning for a lawsuit? Any explanation beyond the vague threats of being banned is welcome, but I must say that the multiple (and seemingly automatic) negative responses without apparent reflection/legal justification make the site appear less credible. The reliability of Knowledge is already under fire; why provoke the issue?
31:
130:
I've been trying to remove some actionable statements from the bio of a well-known litigious subject and somehow as a result keep getting accused of vandalism, with said article automatically reverting. Please keep in mind that there has never been any proof of the deleted statements; they were only
90:
on the IP's talk page at that point, the implication you are making is that the IP ignored the previous four edits and made a fifth vandalism edit. However your claim does not appear to be correct because the IP only made
83:
147:
38:
77:
143:
73:
139:
170:
119:
104:
135:
115:
100:
47:
17:
92:
110:
Everyone makes mistakes, so do not worry about it. Thank you for the speedy response! —
166:
111:
96:
69:
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
161:
86:) has committed "vandalism after final warning." Since there were
25:
157:
87:
65:
95:. Could you help me understand this? Thank you, —
8:
44:Do not edit the contents of this page.
7:
24:
29:
72:has me puzzled. You note that
171:12:52, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
120:01:27, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
105:00:58, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
1:
187:
60:Query regarding AIV report
42:of past discussions.
126:accused of vandalism
18:User talk:Manuelt15
152:
138:comment added by
54:
53:
48:current talk page
178:
151:
132:
33:
32:
26:
186:
185:
181:
180:
179:
177:
176:
175:
133:
128:
62:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
184:
182:
174:
173:
127:
124:
123:
122:
61:
58:
56:
52:
51:
34:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
183:
172:
168:
164:
163:
158:
155:
154:
153:
149:
145:
141:
137:
125:
121:
117:
113:
109:
108:
107:
106:
102:
98:
94:
89:
88:four warnings
85:
82:
79:
75:
74:12.90.175.210
71:
67:
59:
57:
49:
45:
41:
40:
35:
28:
27:
19:
160:
140:68.23.166.79
129:
80:
63:
55:
43:
37:
134:—Preceding
66:Your report
36:This is an
112:Kralizec!
97:Kralizec!
93:two edits
156:Update:
148:contribs
136:unsigned
84:contribs
64:Hello.
39:archive
70:WP:AIV
16:<
167:talk
162:Cirt
144:talk
116:talk
101:talk
78:talk
68:to
169:)
159:.
150:)
146:•
118:)
103:)
165:(
142:(
114:(
99:(
81:·
76:(
50:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.