User talk:Mackensen/Archive17

1939:

the case was accepted too quickly, yes, it was clearly going to touch on Giano, and yes there are more important cases and clarification requests ongoing that await resolution while this case sails through. Its possible that someone else was planning on posting evidence similar to what Kirill wrote, but there's no reason that I can understand for Kirill to have resisted writing it himself. Whether the original civility remedy was wise (and it certainly hasn't had its intended effect, I imagine), Giano has clearly violated it numerous times. A review by the committee was inevitable as a result, and I suppose this case was a convenient opportunity. Perhaps thats why it was accepted. Finally, I confess to not knowing what the wider community thinks about ArbCom (outside of what is written at arbitration pages and now the RfC). On the articles I do occassionally edit (not all controversial), its generally never mentioned. Anyway, we can continue this elsewhere or not at all if you prefer. I've already written more about this case today than I have since it was filed, which is (all things considered) probably not a great idea on my part.

1845:

reverse has rarely happened, except for perhaps in the Mantanmoreland case. There might be a place for the committee, and those who appear before it, to be able to call on relatively non-aligned editors with skills to collect, analyse and present data in an impartial way. I worked up something like that for the Tango case, and am of the impression the committee found the information useful. Some consistency in evidence presentation can be developed (e.g., standardization of tracking back interactions to where they start, presenting links, identifying involved editors, etc), and processes for requests for assistance in developing evidence can be standardised. To be honest, this is one burden I think would be well moved from the shoulders of the committee; there are others who are more talented at doing these things, it provides some very specific support for those appearing before the committee who are technologically limited in developing such information, and to be honest the committee has better things to do.

1799:"mandarins" (at least in the fashion that I understand the term), but it's largely a question of self-selection. The project is run by the people who put themselves forward. If the community prefers conservative arbitrators but gets activist ones instead I think that suggests a disconnect between the community's perception of the job and the nature of the job itself. Having been a freshman arbitrator myself, and having watched two new classes of arbs matriculate, I think that to be the case. My own original candidate's statement is almost embarrassingly naive. I would agree that Paul August represented a different voice on the committee, and if he's been marginalized (I must emphasize that I have paid scant attention to committee affairs since late January) I think it's because he didn't really have a like-minded person on the committee. A minority of one is an uncomfortable place to be. However, we're only going to get more people like Paul if they come forward and run. 1916:

then looks for only the information that supports their bias. I rather doubt it's true, myself, but it's a perception that's hard to eradicate when arbitrators themselves post information that any number of other people were probably pulling together. Fozzie's supposed naïveté notwithstanding, it was obvious when the case was accepted that this was going to be about Giano (there isn't enough in the actions of Geogre and WMC to warrant an Arbcom case), and I was fully expecting someone to post similar evidence at some time. Perhaps that is what bothers me in this particular case - that there was little need for Kirill to pull together evidence and post it, when there was no doubt someone else already working on the same thing. And if they weren't, then they just plain weren't paying attention. It's a long weekend in the US, and given how long the vast majority of arbcom cases are open, there was certainly no rush to have this information posted right at this juncture.

1230:

page that's their own lookout; at least for most people who see it they've opted-in. Unless they're abused the unblock template no one need notice. In so far as Giano is concerned any visitor to his talk page should know what to expect. On a person's talk page the microphone is not so loud as it might be elsewhere. I grant that there are problems reconciling this with my very real anger at Giano's broad (and frequently unwarranted) attacks on administrators in general. We must somehow reconcile this with his strong contributions in the article space (incidentally, speaking of him in the third person feels quite wrong, he's around and should feel free to drop in) and his obvious devotion to the project. The engagement problems are obvious. I think this is one of those situations where I wandered away from the question asked, but hopefully I've said something vaguely relevant.

1967:

questioned. This is no idle speculation; any arbitration-watcher is well aware that this is the third rail of Knowledge (XXG) politics. The committee is criticized both for going too quickly and too slowly; for my part I see no benefit in allowing a case to remain open when passions are liable to run high and the facts are not in doubt. You can impugn anyone's credibility with barbed comments and accusations of bias and conspiracy, but in the end I think it detracts from the core issues. It's frequently said that Arbcom should ignore these issues and focus on the encyclopedia; I think this is perhaps a fair criticism, but it's a two-way street. Editors who frequently involve themselves in the administration of the project have no right to claim disassociation. I've learned that the hard way.

1912:

attention to Giano than I do. I will admit to a certain talent in working with content-oriented editors who have a reputation for behavioural issues; last month I worked with Vintagekits, and the article we worked on was just recognised as a Featured Article. There are others as well, although the footprints aren't always obvious. The one thing they have in common is the circling buzzards expecting, even willing them to fail. Spend a little more time reading the words I write between signature lines, Avruch, and you might realise that my focus is on much bigger issues than Giano, and that most of my concerns are directed to systemic issues rather than the individual failures to which we are all prone.

1514:, Mackensen. I am not sure that the proposed by you committee would be an optimal composition to address all the Knowledge (XXG) problems. I would prefer a different composition but I would withhold naming them to prevent the respected editors from being barraged by my wiki-stalkers and Irpen-nay-sayers. But I can tell you one thing. The committee you proposed would be caught dead acting unethically. Ethics is what the ArbCom has been lacking since before this election. Lack of ethics has become its institutional legacy. With NYB expelled and Paul August burned out and inactive, there is no one really left on the committee now that I can entrust would act upon the ethics abuse. -- 1311:. Calling a spade a spade is not acting indecently. We label sockpuppets as sockpuppets, we label vandals as vandals, and I (and I imagine a great deal of others) would label diffs like those as pure garbage. While it's rare that I block users, I occasionally read unblock messages from blocked users. If any blocked user left a message similar to the messages found in those two diffs, they would be blocked for a very long time, possibly indefinitely. Perhaps I'm simply too idealistic, but I believe we should expect higher standards of behavior from longtime contributors, not lower standards. -- 2545: 1864:

arbitration committee, it bears being repeated: the arbitration committee isn't a court, justice is not its primary goal, and punishing editors in the interests of justice is not its role. Judges don't present separate evidence because it conflicts with the adversarial system of judicial procedure and presents an appearance of a conflict of interests - that of the judge appearing to act on behalf of the prosecution (or defense). There is no prosecution here, there is only one

1769:

with the community, and determine cases apparently based on what interests them most rather than what is brought to them by the community itself. There have to be some middle grounds here, because I know that an extremely conservative Arbcom would be as damaging as an extremely radical one; the problem is that nobody in the community is quite sure which way Arbcom is going to go on any particular day. There is still a significant portion of the community who thinks Arbcom's

1168:

That we hadn't met before then indicates that I used to do a much better job of it. I've seen some frustrating things recently, and I usually just ignore it and go write about hippos, but for some reason it boiled over at you just now. I sincerely don't want you to feel like I'm the sort of editor that you're up against--I do know you're one of the good guys. Conflating your comment with all my general frustrations with ArbCom was grossly unfair. My sincere apologies. --

1361:

silence a critic. I don't think that happened here, but the potential is real. I find myself less willing, as time goes on, to arrogate to myself the judgement as what is or not fair criticism. I may state, as an editor, that I think X is out of line, but as an administrator I would be deeply unwilling to take any official steps, even when X is undoubtedly profane, uncivil, or otherwise destructive. Moving from the abstract to the concrete, Giano

5101:

between American government in this belief: that representatives who have a bond with more of the various constituencies that they collectively represent is a positive? As opposed to all your representatives allied with the same narrow interests? On the other hand, I can see that the editor who most fits the profile of what might be thought of as "my constituency," Blnguyen, wasn't terribly effective in moving arbitration cases forward. --

1214:

microphone is clearly not going to cause anything good, why should we continue to let that person hold the microphone? In this case, a user had continually used the one forum left to him to attack, in no uncertain terms, administrators of this project. You speak of respecting those who give their time to administer this site; why should someone who is simply using Knowledge (XXG) to spew such indecencies be allowed to continue? --

5070:

reality. For my part, I'm looking toward people with experience in the dispute resolution machinery, but balancing that with what I know about their personalities. I also leery of anyone who is primarily a content editor and let me explain why: once you're an arbitrator you have very little time for that kind of thing, and much of the work is drudgery. People who take their primary joy from editing articles are in for a shock.

1525:

community I would vote them as well. Through their repeated attacks and assumptions of bad faith (and I'll give you a load of diffs if you dispute the characterization) they've made the conduct of arbitration damn near impossible. Let them see how the shoe fits. As far as the smear campaign goes, when I see someone calling Kirill the "new Kelly Martin" I think it speaks for itself. That's as loaded a term as can be used here.

3291: 1708:. What do you think of the fact that a majority, or at least a significant minority, of cases from 2006-early 2007 have blank workshop pages? What I find remarkable is that the preferred solution of "my clique" is for Giano to treat other people with the respect he expects to be treated and to express his discontents in a minimally civil manner, while "your clique's" preferred solution is the dissolution of Arbcom. 5477: 4576: 1879:

problem obliquely, address it head on - perhaps there are other better ways for compiling evidence for cases, but there is no inherent problem as I see it in arbitrators doing so. It's part of their role, and there is nothing to suggest that arbitrators should be limited to ruling on evidence presented by parties and other interested folks, or even that they should adhere to the scope of a case request as entered.

1366:

protection. I don't have a good answer for you, beyond these ruminations. I can tell you that talk page protection is deeply repugnant to many people. At some point we have to consider the prejudices of our editors. I would also note that, state of nature aside, we do extend a greater courtesy to our long-term contributors than we do the average vandal. The trick is determining when somebody is over the line.

5354: 3992: 2488: 2427: 2098: 1070: 1009: 906: 713: 2766: 633:). Please consider helping address the several points that I listed on the talk page of the article, which shouldn't take too long to fix with the assistance of multiple editors. I have also left messages on the talk pages for other editors and related WikiProjects to spread the workload around some. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. -- 1806:'s "I know it when I see it" dictum, and I recognize this as untenable. I can state for my own part that I tried to listen as much as possible, and in those cases when someone came to me and said that my conduct had offended them I did what I could to make amends. It's perhaps a fault that I'm always willing to keep talking; perhaps sometimes no good will come of a discussion... 5436: 5032:

appreciate any help from a Knowledge (XXG) veteran like yourself. I really appreciate your previous advice of referencing everything using reliable media sources, which I followed. I'd like to think that we resolve this content dispute on our own but it doesn't look like that's going to happen. Any help at all is appreciated. Thanks a lot.

1256:

upon the idea of collaboration — collaborative editing to create and build free content — and talk page posts that directly attack other editors also directly attack that sacred principle. And those posts should never be tolerated, no matter where they are on this project and no matter how many good article contributions a user has made. --

2199: 5123:

Mackensen, in your role as a member of the Ombudsman Committee, as a CheckUser, and as a former arbitrator, I know that you have had a longstanding interest in editor privacy and confidentiality. The recent arbitration case in which you were involved gave me pause, and I have written an essay on the

5069:

Well, I'd look for people who won't burn out and take a pretty level-headed, perhaps even cynical, view of the task ahead. My own candidate statement, years ago, was full of ridiculous high-flown sentiments and promises of reform. Then I got the job and realized that my perception of it did not match

4750:

Brief reply at the moment. I wrote the original draft a few years ago now; either Foley's book wasn't out yet or I hadn't read it (I think the latter). The entire section on the Schlieffen Plan (more properly the Moltke Plan or Schlieffen-Moltke Plan) should probably be rewritten with those two books

1818:

A related question here, possibly anticipated (I'm on a tiny terminal right now and scrolling up is hard) is that the committee has framed this case at right angles to what the parties requested. That is, what was anticipated as a straightforward wheel-warring case (if those are ever straightforward)

1768:

The fact of the matter is, the community has fairly consistently sent a message that they like conservative candidates who aren't planning on changing the world, and yet we keep seeing Arbcom decisions that interpret policies in novel ways, delegate authority in a manner never considered or discussed

1654:

I'm not a big fan of hyperbole on the part of anyone. Frankly, the biggest problem I see with arbitration is the piggybacking of additional agendas onto what should ideally be dealt with as straightforward issues. Either that, or deal with things doing a full root cause analysis and make that the way

1360:

I don't disagree with you on the need for civility, but I must observe that this view is by no means universal, and that the use of page protection in such circumstances has always been controversial, in the sense that there is sharp disagreement on the practice. I've seen it just as often misused to

1150:

I can see what it looks like from the outside; I'm just grasping for a way to describe how utterly impossible the situation is. Right, and I remember now, the Avruch RfA. As I said then, I wasn't talking about you, but rather the fellow about eight comments down, who had confined himself to "too much

689:

article and the retrospective piece on the Willamsport Crosscutters website. Oddly enough it's not my article; I've just been a minor league baseball kick the last few weeks and happened to notice it. I've found AP pieces (again, Lexis) which mention those players in their write-ups, so I imagine the

668:

I know this might seem anal, but a) I always do it this way and b) we're having an earnest discussion on the DYK talk page about whether we're too slipshod in verifying articles ... one newer user who was caught up in the CarolSpears thing has said he found "rampant" plagiarism in articles on DYK, as

5100:

who's involved in the main content processes. ArbCom is a political process in the most basic sense that it's elected by people, and it's only natural in a political process that people seek out some sort of representative to whom they can relate. Or perhaps I'm making too much of a mental analogy

4801:

Having received an explanation of his carrying out the check at issue, and of the circumstances surrounding it, the Committee finds that the checks run by Lar in March 2008 fell within the acceptable range of CheckUser discretion. The users who brought the matter into the public arena rather than to

1798:

Let me try and formulate a response to Irpen and Risker. First I want to clear the air. I'm serious that I think Irpen, Ghirla and Giano should put themselves forward for Arbcom, or review panels or other administrative tasks of the project. I think it's fair to call the current administrative corps

1579:

not because blehing and mehing is not very cultural. When JPGordon boasts not bothering to read arbcom statements that are "too long", he is being uncivil to the project whose problems he committed himself to solving, still not using any bad words. When Uninvited makes bemusing remarks and then goes

4806:—are reminded that dispute resolution procedures rather than public invective remain the preferred course for addressing matters of user conduct. All CheckUsers are reminded that it is imperative that they make every effort to abide strictly by the Wikimedia Foundation Privacy Policy at all times. 1938:

Hmm, you did indeed take my comments as a slight and responded in kind... I apologize, then, because it wasn't my intention to offend. Your comments are always thoughtful and well reasoned, though I often disagree with you - but I haven't made a practice of following them. For what its worth - yes,

1915:

I would prefer to see people other than arbitrators presenting thorough and well-researched evidence to the committee for many reasons. There is a widely held belief in the larger community (that is, the one away from project space and controversial articles) that Arbcom accepts cases with bias and

1888:

The only other thing I'd intended to write to you, Risker, is something that I hope you won't interpret as a slight against your character or integrity. I think its clear, in this case as in the past, that you (and Bishonen, Geogre, and others) strongly defend Giano (and criticise his critics) each

1863:

The complaints and concerns with arbitrators compiling and presenting evidence result from editors conflating the American-style adversarial court process with the normal process of arbitration on Knowledge (XXG). While the point has been belabored in many other places throughout the history of the

1673:

I'm afraid I must be brief in reply, but it is novel--as Thatcher has pointed out elsewhere, there is absolutely nothing new about this, and to make it a point of contention suggests either a gross unfamiliarity with the arbitration process or a partisan attack. I wish I could soft-pedal this but I

1650:

I'm not entirely sure how novel that theory is; certainly I've seen evidence that candidates for Arbcom who profess to be activist don't get elected, and those who profess to be conservative, to interpret only existing policy, to work with the evidence presented, tend to get elected. Yes, these are

1255:

should never be used to spew such garbage. There is a time and a place for legitimate criticism of user conduct and legitimate criticism of other bad acts. But blatant personal attacks should never be tolerated, and frankly, with nearly any editor, we do not ever tolerate them. The project is built

1167:

I am cringing as I re-read what I wrote on Carcharoth's page (well, except for one thing--would that I had his temperance, I would have avoided leaving such an unhelpful comment). I've been around for awhile, but I try to keep a more constructive profile than you've met in our two encounters now.

1126:

I'm sorry, I really meant that a bit more whimsically and less barbed than it came across. I don't consider Harry Potter to be much of a literary reference, and was thinking more along the lines of satire. Actually, though, we have crossed paths before--on that occasion the flippancy and literary

5082:

Let me amplify here. What's important to me is that we elect people who actually get the job done. I'm as guilty as anyone else in letting work slide. I have no particular concerns about a potential injustice; I've seen maybe three cases in four years which I thought were grossly mishandled, but I

1970:

I question this appeal to the community; I expect most of the community doesn't give a damn about this issue and rather wishes that it would go away, when it thinks about it at all. I await with interest and trepidation this year's elections to see who'll be brave enough to throw his or her hat in

1840:

Oh I anticipated that this was exactly the direction the case would go, and I am hardly alone in that feeling. It seems the only person who didn't see it coming was dear Fozzie, or so he says. I also accurately anticipated what would happen with the IRC remedy. This is essentially a continuation

1554:

Or, Mackensen, and speaking of civility, FT2's posting a 100kB long psychoanalysis of Giano at his talk amounts to a by far greater incivility than all the diffs you can find. And choosing a schoolboy block-length is uncivil too. I guess you were not subjected to such public analysis and therefore

1495:

You know, Mackensen, sarcasm is what has reignited these fires. Do you really think it helps that a former arbitrator is using it to defend a current arbitrator's posting of examples of another editor using sarcasm to highlight the perception of incivility and defective communication in said other

438:, but that would require a wider discussion; you'd also face the possibility of people using s-line instead to get around it. Ultimately, I think the best option is to establish a standard for what boxes display (as with the services/lines issue) and enforce that, instead of a technical arms race. 5494:

status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient

4593:

2562:

2020:

You're probably right, Mackensen; most editors don't care about meta issues until they find themselves trying to use the processes. There are a lot more arbcom watchers out there than meets the eye, though. Avruch, we should probably leave poor Mackensen alone (except maybe to voice an opinion on

1844:

Nonetheless, there is a more general element here that I don't want to see dropped, about evidence. There have indeed been some cases where the quality of the information provided by the community has been found wanting (either lacking or not focused on what the committee wanted to know), but the

1633:

Regarding my "regrettable" comment, I meant it. I find the whole situation regrettable. If I had to sum up my attitude to the last ten days in a single world that would be my choice. I regret that all of this came to pass, and I expressed similar sentiments, in a more verbose form, on Carc's talk

1229:

A few points. I retracted because I decided no good could come of official involvement. I'm done with that. If anyone wants to crib that's fine. My opposition to protection is a principled thing: I have difficulty with the idea of silencing people. If someone wants to spew invective on their talk

423:

There's not much stopping them regardless; there are various ways to game the branch/route parameter as well, but with the potential to really mess up the backend. The benefit of the general-purpose field is that it has no wider utility. Restricting it on s-line itself isn't really an option--too

1878:

In your above comment, Risker, you don't address what I think is your central concern (or at least, what appears to have prompted your concern as expressed) - which is that an arbitrator has presented evidence against Giano in a case that is not, on its face, about Giano. Before you address this

1524:

Well, civility matters or it doesn't. Given the comments that I responding to I think I was remarkably restrained. Please don't mistake me for sarcasm; I'm quite serious. Note that I voted for Giano in the last election, and if Irpen and Ghirla would submit themselves to the consideration of the

654:

You didn't cite the raw stats (and if the baseball project considers BR's raw stats a reliable source, then I'll take it in future hooks), you cited an article about a team on BR that was editable by anyone. The quote wasn't sourced at all, in fact at the time it wasn't even in the article ... I

1658:

The long series of diffs is somewhat problematic for me in that I am aware of some privacy-related issues connected to a few of them; now that they are splashed out on this page, it's closing the barn door to even acknowledge the issue, given that any changes to his evidence will only draw more

261:

I've managed not to blow up anything so far, although I am sure some people would consider that evidence that I lack initiative. Been too busy in RL to spend much time online, unfortunately; today's the first chance I've had to return to my real love, copy editing. (I know. That sounds sort of

1868:

to be on (although opinions differ on where that is, of course) and thus no conflict presented by an arbitrator compiling evidence independently. It goes hand in hand with the old committee determination that conduct by all parties will be reviewed, regardless of whether evidence or claims are

1213:

I saw you were kicking around the User_talk namespace and decided to join in a bit. In your (retracted?) ArbCom statement, you say that, in your view, you would only fully protect a talk page in the case of libel or death threats. My question is, if a person has indicated that their use of the

771:

Just a heads up that I just found your March comments on the then-embryonic Arbcom RFC, and thought they looked pretty good. Maybe it's time to brush off those ideas and start gently pushing them, because unlike some other stuff I think they might actually stand a chance of getting consensus.

1911:

Avruch, I am saddened but not surprised at how much attention you pay to my interactions with Giano, because I spend much more of my time doing other things around here. In fact, I suspect the reason there is a proposed finding of fact and remedy relating to you is that you appear to pay more

1809:

On a final point, I must reiterate what Thatcher (and others) have said. It may be a flaw in the system that arbitrators collect their own evidence, but it is a long standing practice, not forbidden in policy, and certainly not devised for this case. If the committee had to rely solely on the

1365:

been treated badly in the past, and the communication between him, the administrator corps and the Arbitration Committee has been less than ideal. But we're getting away from the main idea, which is whether we should protect talk pages. I think you're making the case for a ban, not talk page

5031:

Mackensen, I realize the talk page is out-of-hand and ridiculous. All I ask is that you look at the edits I've made over the past few days and compare them to the kind of edits (mostly deletions) the other user has been trying to make. I'm really trying to make a good article here and would

1966:

I'm concerned by the focus on personality here, on all sides. This is a wiki--evidence is evidence, regardless of who collects it. Is the evidence itself disputed? I see precious little discussion of that, and I wonder if any editor could have posted such evidence without having his motives

1190:

Believe me, I've been there. After I retired from Arbcom in January I retired to the article space. This is the most time I've spent outside of it in months, and I'm already regretting it. Administration's a pretty thankless task when it's all said and done, and you wind up locked in bitter

1752:

read all of those cases, and quite a few others. They're neither here nor there. And I am not in favour of the dissolution of Arbcom; quite the opposite. Some of the ideas for reform, including some that show up in the "June announcements", are quite good. Mackensen's and your proposed

5054:(it's a very short story, too). As for my RFAR statement, I'd support your corollary. My proposal wasn't meant to be Giano specific. And I wasn't going to support the candidacy of Catherine (lady). Any tips, by the way, on what my priorities ought to be in the coming elections? -- 1962:

First of all, to Avruch, I will not seek nor will I accept another seat on the Arbitration Committee. It's a thankless job and I've found other things to do here. As always, I encourage those with a strong interest in the mechanism of dispute resolution to take a turn in the hot

2915:

Hi, I am trying to upgrade some of the service boxes on certain lines to the s-rail format. I understand it but I do not see how to add extra routes to s-rail so that I could just put "Sheffield-Hull Line" instead of having to use the . Could you tell me how to do this. Thanks,

684:

Yes, the CarolSpears thing occurred to me afterwards. I confess I didn't look closely enough at which part of BR was cited; I wouldn't consider Bullpen reliable, but the stats certainly are. The new hook (which I think gets to the meat of the article) is doubly-sourced: the

629:. In reviewing the article, I have found there are some issues that may need to be addressed, and I'll leave the article on hold for seven days for them to be fixed. I have left this message on your talk page since you have significantly edited the article (based on using 3275:{{s-rail-start|noclear=yes}} {{s-rail|title=National Rail}} {{s-rail-national|previous=Denby Dale|next=Stocksmoor|toc=Northern Rail|route=Penistone Line}} {{s-rail-next|title=Disused Railways}} {{s-rail-national|status=Disused|previous=|next=Shelley|toc=L&YR}} {{end}} 669:

well as errors, and this and his attitude especially (he's had some civility issues before) have rubbed some people the wrong way, although he does have some points about the issues created by DYK being understaffed (so to speak). So, really, the issue cuts both ways.

1819:

has wandered into the old civility territory. The answer to this is that the committee has always considered the behavior of all participants and reserved itself the privilege to frame a case as it sees it, not as the participants see it. It's also obvious that the

4734:

I've read your aricle and the discussion page. I'm curious about your views on the 'Schlieffen Plan'. Have you had second thoughts consequent on Mombauer and Foley's books? I ask because I think that articles about 1914 need more material on recent historiography.

286:

I reverted your edits to the Bio guideline re. the status of Sir/Dame. The argument has been made on talk that the guideline has been discussed extensively previously so should not be elevated to status of title vs. an honorific until there is consensus to change.

1191:

disagreement with people to whom otherwise you might be kindly disposed. Your comment is most appreciated; for my part I'm sorry for the mocking tone I adopted in reply. I trust we'll run into each on better terms in the future--perhaps in the article space ;).

1339:

Not helpful Bish; Giano was a candidate for Arbcom. Whatever standard to behavior we hold admins to; arbs should be higher still. Giano is in the first rank of users here; let us treat him with the respect he deserves, but let us also ask that he reciprocate.

242:

The trains still run on time. Ye Gods, what a nightmarish RfA. I realized just how detached I've gotten from the en community when the opposers were all referencing controversies I'd never heard of! Thank heavens for that. How's adminship treating you?

1659:

attention to what has been changed. I'm in the awkward position of understanding contexts that are not obvious to the average reader but being unable to share the information without causing further damage. I guess we are all having a fun, fun Sunday.

2866:

Minor league baseball is plenty note-worthy, although not as glamorous as MLB to be sure. Most players in those categories played with a major league team; for those that didn't, I'm confident that individual notability can be asserted and defended.

1889:

time his conduct is called into question. While you are certainly entitled to your opinion, and you may even be right, I simply hope and expect that you will continue to correctly choose not to use your administrative tools in Giano-related disputes.

1814:

If we want to talk about changing the system to have prosecutors, managers, advocates, or some such, I'm open to having such a discussion. I would caution, however, that changing the system in the middle of a case would prove difficult to sustain.

5095:

I agree about not letting cases linger for months. I admit to being a bit torn about content. I worry a bit about the balance of the committee as well. So while I see the wisdom in what you're saying, I'd be worried about a committee without

3166: 1686:

I guess, I can't convince you in anything about myself. But your accusing editors like Risker or Carcharoath in being either unfamiliar with the arbitration process or going out on partisan attack speaks length, Mackensen. What an attitude!

4789:

This arbitration case has been closed and the final decision is available at the link above. The CheckUser tool is granted to highly trusted and experienced Wiki users and it must be used with the utmost respect for privacy as governed by

355: 3170: 1272:

Do you mean a "a standard of decency and standard of good conduct" such as repeatedly using the word "spewing" for Giano's posts on his page, MZMcBride? I guess you believe in teaching by example. "Spewing garbage" is especially helpful.

2847:. Maybe I'm not seeing it, but why exactly do we need all of them. It's a categorization to something that's for the most part not notable for players. Heck I have my doubts about some of these players even. Maybe I'm missing something. 1823:

remedy is ineffective; I for one don't see any point in retaining it in its current form, if at all. Again, this may be something that should be changed, but it does not represent a departure from the usual operation of the committee.

213:

Unsigned messages will be ignored. You can sign your messages with four tildes (~~~~). I reserve the right to disruptively eliminate gigantic blobs of wiki-markup from signatures on a whim if I think they're cluttering up my talk page.

2680:. Any evidence you wish to provide should be emailed directly to any sitting Arbitrator for circulation among the rest of the committee. Please submit your evidence within one week, if possible. On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, 5289:

of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank

4923:

4655:

4263:

3041:

1410:

326:

4651: 3429:

Is there any way to left-align the text in the table (players and key)? Sure, by default they are left-aligned, but when the table is centered, all the text is centered also. I've spent the last 20 minutes trying to figure it out.

2364:

I saw where you created a category for their players with the right name (RedHawks instead of Red Hawks). Are you planning on changing it on the players listed in the Red Hawks category? If you're not going to, I thought I would.

5285: 5232: 4919: 4869: 976:

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes

4259: 614: 4052:

does not mean we should excuse it in our community. I agree that ArbComm should not enforce a voluntary undertaking. Social consequences will manifest, in time, against those who break their word. I am content with the

3037: 1406: 1701: 1559:, Mackensen. I would prefer to be verbally abused by some dork in the street than dealing with a cop who has a gun and power over me and acting full of himself and disrespectfully. Even if he won't use f-words, that 322: 4471: 4231: 3077:. If you consider yourself either an active or semi-active member of the project please sign up as an active member. Also, if you are a member, be advised that the project is now atrying to keep all the project's 3206:

Hi Mackensen - have the CountryLink train boxes you created changed in style recently? They look different - like a border has been removed or something? Or am I imagining something? If so, can it be changed back?

468:

Well, we can go ahead with a whitelist in the manner I described, but there should probably be a parallel discussion about the scope of the boxes. My main concern is that it shouldn't stand in the way of rollout.

5243:

As you supported, and I sincerely respect your opinion (regardless of whether I may agree or not), and as "I'm on the fence" (see his talk page), could you help clarify/explain your thoughts on the candidate? -

2304:

club". My goal is to one day have a quorum of the entire ArbCom in the club, which at that point will be more like a priesthood, secretly doing my bidding, at pain of being defrocked and losing their medal.

4497:

Hi, I noticed one problem with your new template but I'm not experienced enough to know how to fix it. When the team's pitcher gets a save it doesn't put it in bold. Other than that it seems to work fine.

1246:

The issue is that we expect, for all users, a standard of decency and standard of good conduct. We expect that users will not make personal attacks and that they will treat each other with respect. Sure,

4947:

good day mackensen, would you please let me know if you are the original writer of the article on beck? if yes, please take a look at my commentary and suggestions on the L. Beck talk page and let me

2730:

To avoid any further risk to the privacy of third parties, the parties to the case are strongly requested not to make any further public statements concerning the matters under review by the Committee.

1595:

Somewhere we have this novel theory that arbitrators may not produce their own evidence. I have never heard of such an idea before; to see someone as hard-working as Kirill, whose outstanding efforts

3725: 5266:

For me, a statement like that from you seems to me a strong endorsement. Due to your your statement above, and personal further thought, I've reverted myself. Thank you for sharing your thoughts. -

2935:

to add an auto-link exception for the appropriate route. If, for example, Sheffield-Hull Line is a Northern Rail route, then you'd add it to the Northern Rail segment. The code would look like this:

2331:

If you unify your global account, the tools would then be available to you automatically on any wiki you visit. If there is any assistance I can offer to help with the process, please let me know.

398:

to work on UK station articles. One thing that is a disadvantage of having general-purpose options is that certain editors may use them to such an extent that the boxes become as cluttered as the

2883: 1496:

editor? This is unbecoming of you, as was the unqualified "Regrettable" comment to the early proposed decision page. Please either speak plainly (as we did the other night) or restrain yourself.

1802:

I can't speak for the conduct of my former colleagues; but I do submit that there is a difference between judicial indifference and outright personal hostility. I may in the position of adopting

5051:

Unfortunately I don't know the first thing about the rails. I do like American literature of a certain vintage, however, and one of my favorite Ernest Hemingway short stories has a train in it

765: 5209:

I'm now getting it working on two, but not the others. Even with forced refreshes, maybe it's my ISP's cache or something, if it is now working on some and it is for you? Thanks for your time.

4689:

I am very frustrated with this because 2 involved administrators are refusing to enforce earlier consensus and Holocaust scholars thinking because they are having different personal thinking.--

5442:

Thanks for making 2008 an interesting and enlightening year for me; I have appreciated working with you on various projects, and look forward to the opportunity to do so again in the future.

1442:

and in fact had to use AWB to see which pages we had overlapped on to figure out where I did make a harsh comment. And actually, I don't remember where we have run into each other in those

1989:"I will not seek..." You say that now, but when me and my cronies are in charge and have Arbitration's train's running on time, you'll be first in the queue to get back aboard, I'll bet. - 538:

Hi there, The point I was making was it just looks a bit redundant having (eg.) "West Ruislip branch" in two adjacent columns, and neater if the middle column just says "Central line". See

3817: 3716: 3708: 3965: 3873: 3781: 3689: 3597: 3377:) but they have their own color, line and route templates. The naming syntax is the name, just add Historical or Disused after "National Rail." Note the use of the "status" parameter for 3240:

Hi, the implementation of s-rail is going well. Some railway station pages have historical and disused railway templates on the page as well as National Rail, see this page for example -

1696:

I have no doubt--in fact, I can see it with my own eyes--that lots of people turn up and express interest in the high profile cases, like Giano, IRC, and Betacommand. Have you ever read

224: 1611:

They may collect evidence. But they cannot arbitrate and collect evidence at the same time. Recuse yourself, withdraw from courtroom discussions and collect all the evidence you want. --

818:

Thanks, the reason came to this at long last was the huge kerfuffle (which I don't take seriously--we've had moral panics like this before). When it dies down there will be interest in

5158:. The poor sole forgot to change the destination, so i fixed that by using "type", but i can't get the "LUL stations" template right to get around the dab's on the stations involved. 3541: 5125: 790:. I think the dust has to settle from this current business before we can really talk about change, though I suspect the committee, for one, would support something of this nature. 4467: 4227: 2401: 4842: 2740:

The administration of the case will be by emails sent to active Arbitrators; please send mail to an Arbitrator of your choice (preferably CC another), and not to the ArbCom list.

2326: 3808: 3800: 4875:

Good day, Mackensen. MBisanz told me you were good with WW1 related topics, so I was wondering if you could help me finding reliable sources for this article. Best regards, --

4783: 2676: 2668: 3909: 3633: 652:

In case the hook that you submitted following our discussion gets moved to the next update (it was approved) and thus the discussion itself deleted, here was my response: "

5498:

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following

4597:

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following

3532: 3524: 2603:

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following

973:, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted. 2566:

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the

1705: 408:

boxes can get now (with comments such as "not Sundays", "Summer only" and so on). Perhaps if these options were restricted it would help maintain some sort of order? --

4835: 1580:

unresponsive to the reaction, he is uncivil. And did I say about psychoanalyzing editors? Civility, Mackensen, is a more elaborated concept than you seem to think. --

5083:

doubt a different committee would have come to a different conclusion. What we can't have are cases which linger for months on end. That serves no one's interest.

1697: 3900: 3892: 3624: 3616: 2844: 2780:, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Knowledge (XXG)'s 5445:

Wishing you and yours a joyous holiday season, and happiness, health and hopefulness in 2009. I trust you'll enjoy this little token, a favourite performance of

2986:| Northern Rail={{#switch:{{{branch}}}|Sheffield-Hull Line|Buxton Line|Manchester-Glossop Line|Hope Valley Line=]|Cleethorpes-Sheffield=]|#default={{{branch}}}}} 1378:

I think the key point is that by making personal attacks against other members of this project, you forfeit the 'right' to wage criticism (legitimate or not). --

4986:

I was about to leave a note asking them to knock it off and saw that you did it. I'm going to suggest a re-write on the talk page and see where it goes. Best,

1841:

and would more correctly be called IRC II, with WMC filling the role of random admin making widely considered poor block, and a stripped down supporting cast.

4794:. CheckUsers must exercise sound judgement, balancing need to protect the community with privacy concerns. Breaches of this should be dealt with through the 4180: 659:

was sourced from Lexis? That might make it reliable, but I still like to actually read the text before I mark it as verified. Or see a quote in the footnote.

4230:

selection process is starting. We are aiming to elect nine coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up

1325:

Yeah, you're simply too idealistic, that's it. I believe we should expect higher standards of behavior from admins than non-admins, not lower standards.

350:

Is it possible to see the content of an article you deleted some time ago? Namely: Queen's University street parties Thank you 06:43, 4 June 2008 (UTC)~

5511: 4610: 3766: 3733: 2616: 2328:

containing the rights needed for an Ombudsman across all Wikimedia wikis, without the requirement of requesting a Steward assign you those permissions.

1563:

uncivil. Your comments above about myself, Ghirla and Giano, who write this project while career mandarins, including at arbcom, treat them in such way

3496:) 22:50, 18 August 2008 (UTC) I installed Firefox and it displays left-aligned bullets. Is there anyway to code it so it will display properly in IE? - 5381:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the 4019:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the 2811:

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the

2515:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the 2454:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the 2125:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the 1097:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the 1036:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the 933:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the 740:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the 5507: 4606: 2816: 2612: 450:

That's true, but gaming those parameters requires a certain amount of ingenuity, which restricts the amount of meddling people might do with it. We

3758: 2733:

The Committee will understand participation in the case by a party as assent to the principle that the information circulated is confidential (cf.

2718:

Please be aware in submitting evidence that it may be shared with other parties to the case, on a confidential basis, at the Committee's discretion.

3858: 3825: 3121: 1773:

is to resolve interpersonal disputes between users. We all know better than that - its purpose is to ensure that the encyclopedia is protected.

3850: 3749: 3582: 3549: 5527: 4971:

Hi Mackensen; just a note asking you to check in on this article and its talk page. I imagine the semi-protect will be expiring soon. Cheers,

4626: 2632: 3574: 2932: 2901: 2893:}} tag on the Quazer Beast page due to its lack of recent activity. If I am mistaken or if you otherwise disagree, feel free to remove it. -- 3488:

I'm using IE 7. So you see a centered table and left-aligned bullets? For me, the names are centered and the bullets don't line up at all. -

3405: 2655: 557:

Point taken, but there's something to be said for linking to the branch as opposed to the station--those links do go to different articles.

5210: 5183: 4715: 3188:

Fascinating. I vaguely remember closing those discussions; consensus may have changed in the last two years--plenty of other stuff has ;).

2785: 3950: 3917: 3841: 3674: 3641: 2939:| Northern Rail={{#switch:{{{branch}}}|Sheffield-Hull Line|Buxton Line|Manchester-Glossop Line|Hope Valley Line=]|#default={{{branch}}}}} 3942: 3666: 193: 5163: 5033: 3565: 2724:

If there is a particular reason not to share some part of your evidence with other parties, please flag that clearly in your submission.

2060:

At least that is my opinion; in the interim, this is probably the best place to attract more eyes. I've also posted to the talk page.

4470:

election has begun. We will be selecting nine coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of fourteen candidates. Please

4374: 4323: 4294: 2965:

Thanks for the help with the above. I now have another problem. If I put "route=Cleethorpes-Sheffield" how can I link that to the page

2781: 5495:

information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

4633: 4594:

information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

4095:"campaign promises are–by long democratic tradition–the least binding form of human commitment." I will sleep better tonight, thanks! 3134: 2563:

information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

3070: 2820: 3933: 3657: 2227: 1303:

I think I made it abundantly clear which posts I was referring to. If not, it includes, but is certainly not limited to, edits like

494: 2597: 2593: 5159: 4345:

It should really be me who is congratulating you on a job well done - you wrote nearly all the station articles for a few lines (

3350: 3138: 2983:

You'll need a specific exception for it; something like this: |Cleethorpes-Sheffield=]. Taking the example above, you'd get this:

5150:

As a lapsed wikipedia user who dabbelled with s-rail back in the day, i noticed some brave sole has addedd s-rail to the former

2721:

Our intention is to circulate the leading points, but not full background detail, unless there are good reasons to do otherwise.

5171: 3371: 5179: 4539:

Okay, feature added--earlier I was looking at the hard-coded tables; I'd forgotten that only August used the new templates.

4290: 4284: 2773: 2544: 4370: 4364: 3178: 2587: 2224: 185: 180: 175: 170: 165: 160: 155: 150: 145: 140: 135: 130: 125: 115: 110: 105: 100: 95: 90: 85: 3074: 3014: 3010: 2581: 4350: 2642: 2244: 80: 75: 70: 65: 60: 55: 50: 45: 40: 2789: 205:, feel free to leave a comment, else please move on. Please ignore the gigantic eye in the corner with the pump-action 2247: 498: 5254:

I've worked with him on this project for years; I know him and respect his judgment. It's as simple as that, really.

5416:

I figured (hoped) you knew what you were getting into. I find it harder to vote for people, knowing what it means.

5382: 4020: 3330: 3307: 2748: 2516: 2455: 2221: 2126: 1098: 1037: 934: 741: 5175: 2898: 2294: 1990: 783: 5476: 4575: 2208: 787: 5137: 4719: 3381: 3222:

Well, I took a look at Central in Sydney and they looked the same to me; I certainly haven't touched anything.

3174: 2449: 2384:

seem implausible that the category didn't exist already for a AAA team. That category is huge; I'll take it to

887: 823: 773: 539: 432: 5214: 5187: 2554: 5037: 4432: 3972: 3880: 3788: 3696: 3604: 3358: 3241: 2681: 2257: 486: 4711: 3964:. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at 3872:. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at 3780:. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at 3688:. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at 3596:. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at 2048: 1754: 1717:

Please don't put words in my mouth, Thatcher. I have a solution for ArbCom but I have not posted it yet. --

803: 5353: 5167: 4636: 3991: 3130: 2966: 2487: 2468: 2426: 2097: 1069: 1008: 905: 712: 665:. I have never had a problem with your Michigan railroad hooks, because they were emininently verifiable. 4791: 4319: 4313: 3013:

expressed interest in a Chicago wiki-meet. If you're interested in coming to another one, take a look at

2824: 2805: 2734: 385: 5369: 5237: 4764: 4512:

It does if the pitcher recording the save belongs to the "home" team. Is that not the desired behavior?

4424: 4346: 4034: 4007: 3501: 3493: 3467: 3435: 3290: 2744: 2503: 2442: 2250: 2240: 2113: 1085: 1024: 966: 959: 921: 728: 674: 638: 578: 547: 490: 5515: 5490:. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the 4767:

on the interweb which I found a serviceable summary, albeit from a point of view I'm not familiar with.

4614: 4589:. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the 2620: 2558:. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the 2510: 1443: 5486: 776: 3423: 3367:

For the station linking Historical and Disused just redirect to the standard National Rail template (

2894: 2176: 1435: 3142: 3066: 2777: 2759: 2346:

I've been corresponding with Cary about this already and we've about completed the process. Thanks,

2279: 1460:

Actually, I'm the one who needs to apologize, for confusing you with MZMcBride (see section above).

5535: 5420: 5335: 5258: 5201: 5087: 5074: 4990: 4903: 4859: 4772: 4755: 4740: 4543: 4528: 4516: 4212: 4158: 4087: 4071: 3480: 3449: 3413: 3391: 3263: 3226: 3192: 2993: 2955: 2890: 2871: 2797: 2530: 2408: 2392: 2350: 2154: 2140: 2079: 2006: 1975: 1831: 1678: 1638: 1603: 1529: 1464: 1383: 1370: 1344: 1316: 1261: 1234: 1219: 1195: 1155: 1112: 1051: 990: 835: 810: 794: 755: 694: 625:

and believe the article currently meets the majority of the criteria and should remain listed as a

591: 561: 531: 519: 473: 442: 362: 306: 247: 17: 4951: 4795: 2804:

notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on

2231: 928: 262:

twisted.) Some of those controversies left me a bit baffled too, which I found oddly reassuring.

5320: 5298: 5106: 5059: 4932: 4886: 4664: 4585: 4482: 4416: 4354: 4272: 4242: 4144: 4136: 4132: 3969: 3877: 3785: 3693: 3601: 3249: 3050: 3022: 2974: 2921: 2659: 2570: 2310: 2283: 2265: 2237: 1895:

And to Mackensen - I know it hasn't been that long, but perhaps you'll reconsider and run again?

1758: 1709: 1621: 1537:

A brief comment. There is nothing to assume, Mackensen, in view of how ArbCom has been acting on

1419: 1330: 1278: 1248: 1173: 1140: 1092: 865: 856: 506: 459: 413: 402: 335: 4552:

I finished the Tigers game log and used your new template on September as well. Looks good now.

2951:

You just have to make sure that there aren't any brackets in use anywhere, or it'll look awful.

2234: 1439: 618: 4955: 4751:

at the base, while noting Zuber's criticisms. It's overdue for a major expansion in any case.

4694: 4630: 4557: 4502: 4440: 4436: 4428: 4401: 3125: 2465: 2404:. On a side note, it seems incredible the roster hasn't been touched since May. Poor Rangers. 2370: 1557:

Being in a position of power and acting full of oneself is more uncivil than saying rude words

948: 5052: 3146: 3109: 3101: 2812: 2052: 2022: 5458: 5406: 5133: 4899:

Indeed, but most of what I can suggest will be print sources. Let me see what I have handy.

4822: 4139:, and possibly comment? (Sorry that it's split across both our talk pages.....) Thanks, -- 4030: 3497: 3489: 3463: 3459: 3431: 2639: 2253: 2065: 2030: 1921: 1850: 1778: 1664: 1501: 670: 634: 574: 543: 267: 232: 5521: 4620: 3117: 3113: 3105: 3097: 3094: 3090: 3086: 3082: 2626: 2385: 2287: 1542: 970: 621:

and I'm specifically going over all of the "Culture and Society" articles. I have reviewed

610: 5376: 5197:

I'm not sure I see the problem--the pages all link together (no red links). What's wrong?

5155: 4803: 4452: 4198: 4126: 2171: 2120: 1555:

can't see it. Neither was I. But I, somehow, noticed such incivility right when I saw it.

1128: 392: 375: 3259:

I think I put some templates in place for those; let me take a look and get back to you.

3078: 1545:

does not apply when there is evidence to the contrary and it does not say "be a fool". --

626: 5531: 5417: 5332: 5255: 5198: 5084: 5071: 4987: 4900: 4856: 4768: 4752: 4736: 4679:

In 2007 you have been involved in discussion about Jasenovac "Holocaust" extermination

4540: 4525: 4513: 4382: 4331: 4302: 4209: 4155: 4084: 4068: 4058: 4049: 3477: 3446: 3409: 3388: 3321: 3260: 3223: 3189: 2990: 2952: 2868: 2848: 2828: 2526: 2405: 2389: 2347: 2336: 2151: 2136: 2076: 2003: 1972: 1828: 1803: 1675: 1635: 1600: 1526: 1461: 1379: 1367: 1341: 1312: 1257: 1231: 1215: 1192: 1152: 1108: 1047: 986: 832: 807: 791: 751: 691: 588: 558: 516: 470: 439: 359: 303: 292: 244: 2843:

That above post being said.. I've noticed that you've made a lot of the categories at

969:

requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge (XXG). This has been done under

5294: 5151: 5102: 5055: 5017: 5003: 4976: 4965: 4928: 4878: 4846: 4660: 4478: 4268: 4238: 4140: 4119: 3316: 3294: 3245: 3212: 3046: 3018: 2970: 2917: 2306: 2301: 2261: 2218: 2135:

Someone must have made a mistake. Your name wasn't listed on the next update page. --

1415: 1326: 1274: 1169: 1136: 1132: 502: 455: 409: 331: 5539: 5462: 5423: 5410: 5338: 5325: 5302: 5270: 5261: 5248: 5218: 5204: 5191: 5110: 5090: 5077: 5063: 5041: 5021: 5007: 4993: 4980: 4959: 4936: 4906: 4893: 4862: 4849: 4829: 4776: 4758: 4744: 4723: 4698: 4668: 4639: 4561: 4546: 4531: 4519: 4506: 4486: 4456: 4405: 4386: 4357: 4335: 4306: 4276: 4246: 4215: 4202: 4161: 4148: 4103: 4090: 4074: 4061: 4038: 3977: 3885: 3793: 3701: 3609: 3505: 3483: 3471: 3452: 3439: 3417: 3394: 3266: 3253: 3229: 3216: 3195: 3182: 3151: 3054: 3025: 2996: 2978: 2958: 2925: 2905: 2874: 2857: 2837: 2765: 2752: 2704: 2662: 2645: 2534: 2473: 2411: 2395: 2374: 2353: 2340: 2314: 2269: 2217:

Awarded to Mackensen, for his contributions to the sum of all human knowledge: from

2181: 2157: 2144: 2082: 2069: 2034: 2009: 1995: 1978: 1947: 1925: 1903: 1854: 1834: 1782: 1721: 1712: 1691: 1681: 1668: 1641: 1624: 1615: 1606: 1584: 1549: 1532: 1518: 1505: 1480: 1467: 1454: 1423: 1387: 1373: 1347: 1333: 1320: 1281: 1265: 1237: 1223: 1198: 1177: 1158: 1144: 1116: 1055: 994: 952: 890: 868: 859: 838: 826: 813: 797: 759: 697: 678: 642: 594: 582: 564: 551: 522: 510: 476: 463: 445: 417: 365: 339: 309: 296: 271: 250: 236: 201:

Spammers: I would like for this page to stay reasonably clean. If you have business

4843:

Talk:Mansfield, Coldwater and Lake Michigan Rail Road#Details of the proposed route

4690: 4553: 4498: 4397: 4100: 2366: 1474: 1448: 1031: 944: 735: 570: 4684: 1599:

won praise from all quarters, smeared because he did his job is frankly too much.

5504:

Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged

4603:

Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged

4373:

has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at

4322:

has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at

4293:

has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at

2609:

Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged

454:

tried to reach consensus before, but haven't been able to reach an agreement. --

5454: 5402: 5360: 5129: 5012:

Hi Mackensen; back to edit-warring again here. I might ask for page protection.

4813: 4683:. Because of your knowledge of this can you please enter new similar discussion 4014: 2636: 2170:

to yours, but I guess someone already noticed. Congrats, if somewhat belated...

2061: 2026: 1941: 1917: 1897: 1846: 1774: 1660: 1497: 831:

And now I figure out who you are--confound you Sidaway and your many names :) --

263: 228: 5435: 4154:

Well, let's try and centralize here. I'll review both discussions momentarily.

3244:. Do s-rail templates currently exist for these or are they yet to be created. 192: 5446: 5233:

Knowledge (XXG):Arbitration Committee Elections December 2008/Vote/Jdforrester

5166:

both have redirects set up from their "x tube station" pages, but the others (

4448: 4194: 4187:

I'm on freenode as fluff. Please contact me there or on my talk-page on svwp.

1718: 1688: 1612: 1581: 1546: 1515: 622: 4184: 4176: 3404:

Ignoring your request for "No Solicitation", I've proposed a projects merger

5491: 5267: 5245: 4590: 4378: 4327: 4298: 3998: 2559: 2332: 782:

Thanks for the vote of confidence. I've kicked it around in another form at

288: 4423:

stations, but you didn't do so bad yourself. I only got one station on the

2943:

Now, we could simply auto-link all routes on Northern Rail also, with this:

1757:

is, I think, a really good idea that could fly; maybe you could learn from

573:

article linked to by the "Central line" caption (ie. middle-column)! best,

5279:

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXIII (November 2008)

3124:

page. Please help add any discussion you are aware of at this location.--

1810:

evidence put forth by partisans it would be in a very difficult position,

1655:

cases get done. I do agree with you - the entire situation is regrettable.

630: 5013: 4999: 4972: 4645:

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXI (September 2008)

3208: 2735:

Knowledge (XXG):Mediation#When should a mediation be held confidentially?

1702:

Knowledge (XXG):Requests for arbitration/International Churches of Christ

1438:

and please accept my apologies, I certainly didn't intend to take an ill

4913:

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXII (October 2008)

2714:

These notes are detailed guidelines for the case, agreed by the ArbCom.

4096: 2931:

Well, there are different ways to approach this. You'll need to modify

2494: 2433: 1651:

the folks who were elected - is this the platform they were elected on?

912: 719: 206: 1400:

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXVIII (June 2008)

1251:

is not in a 'public' place like AN or AN/I, but my point is more that

4765:

http://belfercenter.ksg.harvard.edu/files/IS3202_pp155-191_Lieber.pdf

4253:

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXX (August 2008)

4222:

Nominations for the Military history WikiProject coordinator election

2278:

I was quite pleasantly surprised to see your name on my watchlist at

2104: 1076: 1015: 4118:

Hi, would you be able to read the discussions I've been having with

3031:

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXIX (July 2008)

2325:

As you may know, there is now an Ombudsman global permissions group

316:

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXVII (May 2008)

354:

The deleted revisions still exist, so any of the administrators in

4420: 4183:

and I'm lurking to get into #wikimedia-checkuser. As stated on my

2674:

An Arbitration case involving you has been opened, and is located

358:

should be able to provide you with a copy of the article. Cheers,

191: 617:

to go over all of the current GAs and see if they still meet the

5364: 4002: 2884:

Knowledge (XXG):Society for the Preservation of the Quazer Beast

2577: 2498: 2437: 2198: 2108: 1151:

drama" (whatever that meant). Your point is taken all the same.

1080: 1019: 916: 723: 4524:

Hang on, you're right--stuff is broken in August. Looking now.

3271:

They exist in embryo form. Here's an example of a Disused line:

1761:'s example and just stick an "approved policy" template on it, 3458:

tags are placed around the template in an article. Like this:

2388:

so we can get a bot to deal with it. Thanks for the heads-up.

4841:

You may be interested in the map links and notes I posted at

227:, you're genuinely glad your RfB turned out the way it did. 5475: 5434: 4574: 4427:, and you did all the rest, not to mentions a good chunk of 3476:

Still looks left-aligned to me. What browser are you using?

2815:, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the 2764: 2543: 1446:, could you clarify where so I can learn from my mistakes? 587:

Fair enough; I've changed it to mirror Leytonstone. Cheers,

5331:

I acknowledge receipt and I'll be looking into the matter.

4870:

Nationalism and Imperialism in Germany before World War One

4763:

I wouldn't mind joining in when you're ready. There's this

4353:, etc.) It's great to see that they're finally all done. -- 3445:

It looks left-aligned to me; where do you see it centered?

1748:

I think that's a rather limited view, Thatcher. In fact, I

2792:). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the 2727:

We will be open to all requests for further clarification.

3750:

Category:Baronets in the baronetage of the United Kingdom

3717:

Category:Baronets in the Baronetage of the United Kingdom

3709:

Category:Baronets in the Baronetage of the United Kingdom

1827:

I hope I've provided some points for going forward here.

2784:, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also " 5499: 5399: 4784:

Knowledge (XXG):Requests for arbitration/SlimVirgin-Lar

4680: 4598: 4375:

the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page

4324:

the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page

4295:

the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page

3958: 3954: 3946: 3938: 3925: 3921: 3913: 3905: 3866: 3862: 3854: 3846: 3833: 3829: 3821: 3813: 3774: 3770: 3762: 3754: 3741: 3737: 3729: 3721: 3682: 3678: 3670: 3662: 3649: 3645: 3637: 3629: 3590: 3586: 3578: 3570: 3557: 3553: 3545: 3537: 2669:

Knowledge (XXG):Requests for arbitration/SlimVirgin-Lar

2604: 2167: 2058: 1511: 1493: 1308: 1304: 883: 2600:

for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

5391:

Backslash Forwardslash 17:46, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

4802:

a suitable dispute resolution process—in particular,

1706:

Knowledge (XXG):Requests for arbitration/John Buscema

3842:

Category:Baronets in the baronetage of Great Britain

3809:

Category:Baronets in the Baronetage of Great Britain

3801:

Category:Baronets in the Baronetage of Great Britain

3069:, but you have participated in discussion at either 2947:| Northern Rail={{#switch:{{{branch}}}|#default=]}} 5526:. If you have any questions please ask them at the 4625:. If you have any questions please ask them at the 3065:You have been not signed up as an active member of 2631:. If you have any questions please ask them at the 3566:Category:Baronets in the baronetage of Nova Scotia 3533:Category:Baronets in the Baronetage of Nova Scotia 3525:Category:Baronets in the Baronetage of Nova Scotia 2969:? I have experimented but can not get it to work. 2540:Image source problem with Image:Arthur_balfour.jpg 1869:presented in each instance of problematic conduct. 1698:Knowledge (XXG):Requests for arbitration/Ebionites 855:Interesting. I'd long forgotten about that page. 542:for the much neater example you just fixed. best, 4462:Military history WikiProject coordinator election 4396:Whatever you'd like to do is fine with me. :-) - 2580:. If you believe the media meets the criteria at 2025:) so that he can return to his plowshares. Best, 4836:Mansfield, Coldwater and Lake Michigan Rail Road 3157:AfD Names of some cities in different languages 2002:I doubt my ticket would be good on that train. 3934:Category:Baronets in the baronetage of Ireland 3901:Category:Baronets in the Baronetage of Ireland 3893:Category:Baronets in the Baronetage of Ireland 3658:Category:Baronets in the baronetage of England 3625:Category:Baronets in the Baronetage of England 3617:Category:Baronets in the Baronetage of England 2845:Category:Minor league baseball players by team 1634:page. I don't envy the parties going forward. 971:section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion 690:article at least isn't untruthful ;). Thanks, 302:As you like. It makes no material difference. 4571:Image source problem with Image:Michaelis.jpg 2594:Knowledge (XXG):Image copyright tags#Fair use 515:I think I've identified and fixed the issue. 424:many other projects rely on the template. We 8: 5401:And it was much appreciated. I think. ;-) 5182:). Any help with this would be appreciated. 4048:Just because lying is common in places like 3408:and would appreciate any comments. Regards, 3161:Way back in June 2006, the consensus was to 3120:discussion pages in one location at the new 2656:Knowledge (XXG):Requests_for_arbitration#Lar 5472:Image source problem with Image:Mackens.jpg 4083:What's this, lying in DC? Surely you jest! 1472:Ahh, I understand, happens all the time :) 5348: 5238:User_talk:Jdforrester#Arbcom_election_note 3986: 3122:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Chicago/Review 2482: 2421: 2150:Weird; probably saw the alt hook. Thanks! 2092: 1064: 1003: 900: 707: 5373:was updated with a fact from the article 4011:was updated with a fact from the article 2507:was updated with a fact from the article 2446:was updated with a fact from the article 2117:was updated with a fact from the article 1089:was updated with a fact from the article 1028:was updated with a fact from the article 925:was updated with a fact from the article 732:was updated with a fact from the article 5128:. Your thoughts would be appreciated. 5118: 4468:Military history WikiProject coordinator 4228:Military history WikiProject coordinator 3280: 2576:tag can be used to release it under the 5293:This has been an automated delivery by 4927:This has been an automated delivery by 4659:This has been an automated delivery by 4477:This has been an automated delivery by 4267:This has been an automated delivery by 4237:This has been an automated delivery by 3045:This has been an automated delivery by 2776:template has been added to the article 1812:as the system is presently constituted. 1414:This has been an automated delivery by 980:{{transclusionless}}</noinclude: --> 864:Significant tweakage has been applied. 330:This has been an automated delivery by 5510:. If the image is copyrighted under a 4708:Mackenson is an ehm eye fihve agent. 4609:. If the image is copyrighted under a 4291:Template:Succession box three to three 4285:Template:Succession box three to three 3017:and let us know your thoughts. best — 2615:. If the image is copyrighted under a 2196: 1765:the community will pay attention. ;-) 71:/Archive (December 2005–February 2006) 51:/Archive (November 2004–February 2005) 3165:the unencyclopedic lists of names of 3071:Knowledge (XXG) talk:Meetup/Chicago 3 2967:Sheffield-Lincoln Line#Grimsby branch 2933:Template:National Rail lines/branches 485:There appears to be a problem on the 7: 4447:finish them all, and we didn't. ---- 4371:Template:Succession box three to one 4365:Template:Succession box three to one 4190:Best regards and thanks in advance! 2598:Knowledge (XXG):Image copyright tags 1567:uncivil and offensive. When Lokshin 1127:namedropping was along the lines of 605:Icelanders GA Sweeps Review: On Hold 388:. I think we should be able to get 384:Hi, thanks for your recent posts at 96:/Archive (October 2006–January 2007) 66:/Archive (August 2005–December 2005) 5524:after 22:38, 27 December 2008 (UTC) 4792:Wikimedia Foundation Privacy Policy 2592:or one of the other tags listed at 2260:. Thank you for all that you do! 569:Well, two sub-sections of the same 76:/Archive (February 2006–April 2006) 46:/Archive (April 2004–November 2004) 2166:I was just coming to transfer the 111:/Archive (August 2007–January 2008 24: 4623:after 13:33, 5 October 2008 (UTC) 4419:as much as I did for his work on 2790:Knowledge (XXG)'s deletion policy 2282:just now. You can also now join 1577:because it is done from the bench 495:Hope (Derbyshire) railway station 126:/Archive (January 2009–June 2009) 121:/Archive (June 2008–January 2009) 116:/Archive (January 2008–June 2008) 101:/Archive (January 2007–June 2007) 91:/Archive (July 2006–October 2006) 56:/Archive (February 2005–May 2005) 41:/Archive (August 2003–April 2004) 5352: 3990: 3289: 3075:Knowledge (XXG):Meetup/Chicago 3 3015:Knowledge (XXG):Meetup/Chicago 3 2582:Knowledge (XXG):Non-free content 2486: 2425: 2197: 2096: 1575:from the bench, this is uncivil 1068: 1007: 904: 711: 499:Hope(Derbyshire) railway station 186:/Archive (April 2022–April 2023) 181:/Archive (April 2021–April 2022) 176:/Archive (April 2020–April 2021) 171:/Archive (April 2019–April 2020) 166:/Archive (April 2018–April 2019) 161:/Archive (April 2017–April 2018) 156:/Archive (April 2016–April 2017) 151:/Archive (April 2015–April 2016) 146:/Archive (April 2014–April 2015) 141:/Archive (April 2013–April 2014) 136:/Archive (April 2011–April 2013) 106:/Archive (June 2007–August 2007) 4411:Re: All Metra Stations finished 4234:by 23:59 (UTC) on September 14! 3460:Nashville_Sounds#Current_roster 2629:after 11:32, 21 July 2008 (UTC) 764: 131:/Archive (June 2009–April 2011) 61:/Archive (May 2005–August 2005) 5528:Media copyright questions page 5451:, for your holiday amusement. 4809:For the Arbitration Committee, 4796:Wikimedia Ombudsman Commission 4627:Media copyright questions page 4562:04:42, 30 September 2008 (UTC) 4547:01:18, 30 September 2008 (UTC) 4532:00:56, 30 September 2008 (UTC) 4520:00:46, 30 September 2008 (UTC) 4507:00:26, 30 September 2008 (UTC) 4487:22:43, 15 September 2008 (UTC) 2633:Media copyright questions page 219:So...how are the trains doing? 81:/Archive (April 2006–May 2006) 1: 5540:22:38, 27 December 2008 (UTC) 5463:03:18, 25 December 2008 (UTC) 5424:02:49, 17 December 2008 (UTC) 5411:02:42, 17 December 2008 (UTC) 5339:00:30, 10 December 2008 (UTC) 5219:19:28, 23 November 2008 (UTC) 5205:16:00, 23 November 2008 (UTC) 5192:11:35, 23 November 2008 (UTC) 5138:05:14, 19 November 2008 (UTC) 5111:04:24, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 5091:12:20, 19 November 2008 (UTC) 5078:11:56, 19 November 2008 (UTC) 5064:04:42, 19 November 2008 (UTC) 5042:03:24, 23 November 2008 (UTC) 5022:01:44, 23 November 2008 (UTC) 5008:03:50, 19 November 2008 (UTC) 4994:03:48, 19 November 2008 (UTC) 4981:03:46, 19 November 2008 (UTC) 4960:17:30, 14 November 2008 (UTC) 4937:00:24, 14 November 2008 (UTC) 4907:00:22, 11 November 2008 (UTC) 4894:14:42, 10 November 2008 (UTC) 4457:20:04, 8 September 2008 (UTC) 4439:stations and the other three 4406:14:52, 6 September 2008 (UTC) 4387:09:23, 6 September 2008 (UTC) 4358:22:54, 5 September 2008 (UTC) 4336:14:24, 5 September 2008 (UTC) 4307:11:15, 5 September 2008 (UTC) 4277:23:40, 2 September 2008 (UTC) 4247:22:51, 1 September 2008 (UTC) 4067:Oh, no disagreement from me. 2823:, where it may be deleted if 2290:members who were awarded the 802:Well, I've taken the plunge: 86:/Archive (May 2006–July 2006) 5508:criteria for speedy deletion 5326:23:24, 9 December 2008 (UTC) 5303:16:56, 6 December 2008 (UTC) 5271:06:14, 6 December 2008 (UTC) 5262:00:19, 5 December 2008 (UTC) 5249:22:42, 4 December 2008 (UTC) 5119:I'd appreciate your thoughts 4863:11:09, 30 October 2008 (UTC) 4850:08:57, 30 October 2008 (UTC) 4830:01:12, 30 October 2008 (UTC) 4777:11:36, 30 October 2008 (UTC) 4759:11:14, 30 October 2008 (UTC) 4745:14:54, 29 October 2008 (UTC) 4724:00:35, 18 October 2008 (UTC) 4699:16:25, 17 October 2008 (UTC) 4607:criteria for speedy deletion 4351:Milwaukee District/West Line 2613:criteria for speedy deletion 223:I'll bet that at times like 5154:stations that are now just 4669:23:13, 6 October 2008 (UTC) 4640:13:33, 5 October 2008 (UTC) 4216:22:43, 26 August 2008 (UTC) 4203:14:13, 26 August 2008 (UTC) 4162:01:59, 26 August 2008 (UTC) 4149:01:56, 26 August 2008 (UTC) 4104:03:38, 24 August 2008 (UTC) 4091:03:29, 24 August 2008 (UTC) 4075:03:13, 24 August 2008 (UTC) 4062:03:10, 24 August 2008 (UTC) 4039:14:10, 20 August 2008 (UTC) 3978:09:07, 20 August 2008 (UTC) 3886:09:06, 20 August 2008 (UTC) 3794:09:04, 20 August 2008 (UTC) 3702:09:01, 20 August 2008 (UTC) 3610:08:59, 20 August 2008 (UTC) 3506:22:54, 18 August 2008 (UTC) 3484:22:42, 18 August 2008 (UTC) 3472:22:35, 18 August 2008 (UTC) 3457:I mean when <center: --> 3453:22:02, 18 August 2008 (UTC) 3440:19:33, 18 August 2008 (UTC) 3418:02:12, 16 August 2008 (UTC) 3395:22:54, 13 August 2008 (UTC) 3267:22:00, 12 August 2008 (UTC) 3254:21:29, 12 August 2008 (UTC) 3230:00:30, 12 August 2008 (UTC) 3217:00:21, 12 August 2008 (UTC) 3196:03:03, 11 August 2008 (UTC) 3183:02:55, 11 August 2008 (UTC) 3173:cities, but they're back. 3152:17:18, 10 August 2008 (UTC) 2889:Hello. I have placed the {{ 2786:What Knowledge (XXG) is not 2651:Arbitration request opened. 1209:Fully protecting talk pages 5555: 5520:the image will be deleted 4619:the image will be deleted 3055:02:01, 3 August 2008 (UTC) 3026:18:46, 1 August 2008 (UTC) 2997:22:26, 8 August 2008 (UTC) 2979:14:48, 8 August 2008 (UTC) 2625:the image will be deleted 2049:Knowledge (XXG):Devolution 1755:Knowledge (XXG):Devolution 804:Knowledge (XXG):Devolution 788:User:Thatcher/Block review 428:restrict what's passed by 3518:Baronet CFD notifications 3356: 3354: 3349: 3347: 3342: 3337: 3328: 3326: 3314: 3312: 3305: 2959:21:39, 30 July 2008 (UTC) 2926:19:25, 30 July 2008 (UTC) 2906:16:52, 29 July 2008 (UTC) 2875:23:03, 27 July 2008 (UTC) 2858:22:22, 27 July 2008 (UTC) 2838:22:10, 27 July 2008 (UTC) 2813:proposed deletion process 2753:18:52, 27 July 2008 (UTC) 2705:14:30, 23 July 2008 (UTC) 2663:14:21, 21 July 2008 (UTC) 2646:11:32, 21 July 2008 (UTC) 2535:15:50, 12 July 2008 (UTC) 2474:21:35, 11 July 2008 (UTC) 2203: 1436:User_talk:Carcharoth#Note 965:A tag has been placed on 953:03:05, 30 June 2008 (UTC) 869:02:57, 29 June 2008 (UTC) 860:02:14, 29 June 2008 (UTC) 839:01:40, 29 June 2008 (UTC) 827:01:36, 29 June 2008 (UTC) 814:01:30, 29 June 2008 (UTC) 798:00:56, 29 June 2008 (UTC) 784:User:Mackensen/Devolution 777:00:31, 29 June 2008 (UTC) 760:08:04, 28 June 2008 (UTC) 698:14:17, 27 June 2008 (UTC) 679:14:09, 27 June 2008 (UTC) 643:06:35, 23 June 2008 (UTC) 631:this article history tool 611:WikiProject Good Articles 595:22:24, 14 June 2008 (UTC) 583:22:18, 14 June 2008 (UTC) 565:04:02, 14 June 2008 (UTC) 552:00:18, 14 June 2008 (UTC) 523:21:15, 12 June 2008 (UTC) 511:20:15, 12 June 2008 (UTC) 477:02:19, 10 June 2008 (UTC) 464:02:15, 10 June 2008 (UTC) 446:01:39, 10 June 2008 (UTC) 418:01:33, 10 June 2008 (UTC) 5516:Knowledge (XXG):Fair use 4615:Knowledge (XXG):Fair use 4443:stations. Of course, he 4415:I know you complimented 2817:speedy deletion criteria 2621:Knowledge (XXG):Fair use 2555:Image:Arthur_balfour.jpg 2450:Chris Lambert (baseball) 2412:10:44, 9 July 2008 (UTC) 2396:10:32, 9 July 2008 (UTC) 2375:04:28, 9 July 2008 (UTC) 2354:18:19, 8 July 2008 (UTC) 2341:17:23, 8 July 2008 (UTC) 2315:23:50, 7 July 2008 (UTC) 2270:23:31, 7 July 2008 (UTC) 2190:The Quarter Century Club 2182:23:17, 7 July 2008 (UTC) 2158:22:12, 7 July 2008 (UTC) 2145:22:10, 7 July 2008 (UTC) 2083:20:34, 7 July 2008 (UTC) 2070:20:21, 7 July 2008 (UTC) 2035:21:53, 6 July 2008 (UTC) 2010:10:38, 7 July 2008 (UTC) 1996:04:14, 7 July 2008 (UTC) 1979:21:31, 6 July 2008 (UTC) 1948:23:23, 6 July 2008 (UTC) 1926:20:59, 6 July 2008 (UTC) 1904:20:09, 6 July 2008 (UTC) 1855:19:45, 6 July 2008 (UTC) 1835:18:59, 6 July 2008 (UTC) 1783:17:31, 6 July 2008 (UTC) 1722:16:59, 6 July 2008 (UTC) 1713:16:56, 6 July 2008 (UTC) 1692:16:41, 6 July 2008 (UTC) 1682:15:51, 6 July 2008 (UTC) 1669:15:48, 6 July 2008 (UTC) 1642:15:27, 6 July 2008 (UTC) 1625:16:47, 6 July 2008 (UTC) 1616:16:34, 6 July 2008 (UTC) 1607:15:16, 6 July 2008 (UTC) 1585:16:34, 6 July 2008 (UTC) 1550:15:55, 6 July 2008 (UTC) 1533:15:12, 6 July 2008 (UTC) 1519:16:01, 6 July 2008 (UTC) 1506:15:04, 6 July 2008 (UTC) 1481:19:51, 6 July 2008 (UTC) 1468:12:15, 6 July 2008 (UTC) 1455:06:38, 6 July 2008 (UTC) 1424:19:29, 5 July 2008 (UTC) 1388:07:26, 4 July 2008 (UTC) 1374:04:53, 4 July 2008 (UTC) 1348:11:53, 4 July 2008 (UTC) 1334:06:59, 4 July 2008 (UTC) 1321:06:18, 4 July 2008 (UTC) 1282:05:52, 4 July 2008 (UTC) 1266:04:42, 4 July 2008 (UTC) 1238:04:28, 4 July 2008 (UTC) 1224:04:17, 4 July 2008 (UTC) 1199:03:37, 4 July 2008 (UTC) 1178:03:26, 4 July 2008 (UTC) 1159:03:11, 4 July 2008 (UTC) 1145:03:07, 4 July 2008 (UTC) 1117:14:50, 2 July 2008 (UTC) 1056:08:50, 2 July 2008 (UTC) 995:07:20, 1 July 2008 (UTC) 891:03:20, 1 July 2008 (UTC) 540:Leytonstone tube station 497:is being interpreted as 366:13:40, 4 June 2008 (UTC) 340:01:20, 3 June 2008 (UTC) 310:23:51, 1 June 2008 (UTC) 297:23:15, 1 June 2008 (UTC) 272:02:56, 2 June 2008 (UTC) 251:23:55, 1 June 2008 (UTC) 237:22:28, 1 June 2008 (UTC) 5480:Image Copyright problem 5448:Baby, it's Cold Outside 5383:Did you know? talk page 5345:DYK for People v. Salem 4579:Image Copyright problem 4433:Milwaukee District/West 4021:Did you know? talk page 3242:Shepley railway station 3202:CountryLink train boxes 2737:for some good reasons). 2548:Image Copyright problem 2517:Did you know? talk page 2456:Did you know? talk page 2127:Did you know? talk page 1099:Did you know? talk page 1038:Did you know? talk page 935:Did you know? talk page 766:"Mackensen's_ramblings" 742:Did you know? talk page 5481: 5439: 4950:thanks and best wishes 4580: 3372:National Rail stations 2827:to delete is reached. 2782:criteria for inclusion 2769: 2549: 2321:Ombudsman global group 2168:note from my talk page 1434:I saw your comment at 648:Williamsport Bills DYK 197: 5484:Thanks for uploading 5479: 5438: 4583:Thanks for uploading 4578: 4493:MLB Game log template 4425:North Central Service 4347:North Central Service 4044:Consequences of lying 2821:Articles for Deletion 2819:or it can be sent to 2768: 2758:Proposed deletion of 2552:Thanks for uploading 2547: 195: 5316:You have new email! 4704:This user is corrupt 4652:September 2008 issue 4168:#wikimedia-checkuser 3424:Template:MiLB roster 2588:non-free fair use in 2584:, use a tag such as 1597:as an article writer 655:assume you mean the 5286:November 2008 issue 5164:Watford High Street 5146:LUL S-rail question 4855:Indeed--very cool! 4586:Image:Michaelis.jpg 4466:The September 2008 4320:Template:PeerNavbox 4314:Template:PeerNavbox 4179:@svwp, just became 4122:recently regarding 3966:the discussion page 3874:the discussion page 3782:the discussion page 3690:the discussion page 3598:the discussion page 3175:Heroeswithmetaphors 3009:Mackensen - you've 2464:Congratulations! -- 2075:And I've added it. 958:Speedy deletion of 532:North Acton station 346:Article you deleted 18:User talk:Mackensen 5506:, as described on 5482: 5440: 4920:October 2008 issue 4730:Helmuth von Moltke 4605:, as described on 4581: 4392:RE: Zachary Simons 4363:TfD nomination of 4312:TfD nomination of 4283:TfD nomination of 4208:It has been done. 4114:S-rail discussions 3891:CfD nomination of 3799:CfD nomination of 3707:CfD nomination of 3615:CfD nomination of 3523:CfD nomination of 3301:Following station 3284:Preceding station 2770: 2611:, as described on 2550: 2511:Anastacio Martínez 2479:Anastacio Martínez 1946: 1902: 1249:User talk:Giano II 979:<noinclude: --> 967:Template:IRT style 960:Template:IRT style 198: 5487:Image:Mackens.jpg 5389: 5388: 5305: 4939: 4892: 4714:comment added by 4671: 4489: 4441:Heritage Corridor 4437:SouthWest Service 4429:BNSF Railway Line 4279: 4260:August 2008 issue 4249: 4027: 4026: 3898:I have nominated 3806:I have nominated 3714:I have nominated 3622:I have nominated 3530:I have nominated 3365: 3364: 3338:Disused railways 3150: 3057: 2774:proposed deletion 2710:Notes for parties 2523: 2522: 2471: 2462: 2461: 2418:Chris Lambert DYK 2360:Oklahoma RedHawks 2275: 2274: 2133: 2132: 1999: 1940: 1896: 1539:several occasions 1426: 1105: 1104: 1044: 1043: 941: 940: 748: 747: 663:trust, but verify 342: 5546: 5512:non-free license 5356: 5349: 5323: 5313:Dear Mackensen, 5292: 5160:Watford Junction 4926: 4891: 4889: 4876: 4828: 4825: 4726: 4658: 4611:non-free license 4476: 4474:by September 30! 4266: 4236: 4131: 4125: 4085:Heimstern Läufer 3994: 3987: 3975: 3963: 3962: 3931:for renaming to 3930: 3929: 3883: 3871: 3870: 3839:for renaming to 3838: 3837: 3791: 3779: 3778: 3747:for renaming to 3746: 3745: 3699: 3687: 3686: 3655:for renaming to 3654: 3653: 3607: 3595: 3594: 3563:for renaming to 3562: 3561: 3386: 3380: 3376: 3370: 3319: 3293: 3281: 3128: 3044: 2855: 2835: 2803: 2802: 2796: 2745:Charles Matthews 2701: 2699: 2697: 2695: 2693: 2617:non-free license 2591: 2575: 2569: 2490: 2483: 2469: 2429: 2422: 2299: 2295:The 25 DYK Medal 2293: 2201: 2194: 2193: 2179: 2174: 2100: 2093: 1993: 1987: 1477: 1451: 1413: 1072: 1065: 1011: 1004: 908: 901: 897:Kyle Pearson DYK 715: 708: 437: 431: 407: 401: 397: 391: 380: 374: 329: 5554: 5553: 5549: 5548: 5547: 5545: 5544: 5543: 5474: 5466: 5432: 5397: 5377:People v. Salem 5347: 5321: 5319:Best wishes, – 5311: 5281: 5229: 5172:Carpenders Park 5156:Watford DC Line 5148: 5124:topic which is 5121: 5049: 4969: 4945: 4915: 4887: 4877: 4873: 4839: 4823: 4811: 4787: 4732: 4709: 4706: 4677: 4647: 4573: 4495: 4464: 4413: 4394: 4368: 4343: 4317: 4288: 4255: 4224: 4170: 4129: 4123: 4116: 4046: 3985: 3983:Gary Glover DYK 3973: 3936: 3932: 3903: 3899: 3896: 3881: 3844: 3840: 3811: 3807: 3804: 3789: 3752: 3748: 3719: 3715: 3712: 3697: 3660: 3656: 3627: 3623: 3620: 3605: 3568: 3564: 3535: 3531: 3528: 3520: 3427: 3402: 3400:Proposed merger 3384: 3382:s-rail-national 3378: 3374: 3368: 3361: 3333: 3324: 3315: 3310: 3276: 3238: 3204: 3159: 3063: 3038:July 2008 issue 3033: 3007: 2913: 2904: 2895:UberScienceNerd 2887: 2849: 2829: 2800: 2794: 2793: 2763: 2691: 2689: 2687: 2685: 2683: 2672: 2653: 2590:|article name}} 2585: 2573: 2567: 2542: 2481: 2420: 2362: 2323: 2297: 2291: 2192: 2177: 2172: 2121:Francis Beltran 2091: 2089:Francis Beltran 2056: 1991: 1491: 1475: 1449: 1432: 1407:June 2008 issue 1402: 1211: 1129:Harry Frankfurt 1124: 1063: 1002: 963: 899: 769: 706: 650: 609:As part of the 607: 536: 435: 433:s-rail-national 429: 405: 399: 395: 389: 382: 378: 372: 348: 318: 284: 221: 190: 34:Mackensenarchiv 31: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 5552: 5550: 5473: 5470: 5468: 5465: 5452: 5443: 5433: 5431: 5430:Happy holidays 5428: 5427: 5426: 5396: 5393: 5387: 5386: 5357: 5346: 5343: 5342: 5341: 5310: 5307: 5291: 5280: 5277: 5276: 5275: 5274: 5273: 5241: 5240: 5235: 5228: 5225: 5224: 5223: 5222: 5221: 5211:91.109.230.127 5184:91.109.230.127 5180:Headstone Lane 5147: 5144: 5142: 5120: 5117: 5116: 5115: 5114: 5113: 5080: 5048: 5045: 5029: 5028: 5027: 5026: 5025: 5024: 4998:Cool. Thanks, 4968: 4963: 4949: 4944: 4941: 4925: 4914: 4911: 4910: 4909: 4872: 4867: 4866: 4865: 4838: 4833: 4810: 4786: 4781: 4780: 4779: 4761: 4731: 4728: 4716:217.42.165.136 4705: 4702: 4676: 4673: 4657: 4646: 4643: 4572: 4569: 4567: 4565: 4564: 4537: 4536: 4535: 4534: 4494: 4491: 4475: 4463: 4460: 4412: 4409: 4393: 4390: 4367: 4361: 4342: 4339: 4316: 4310: 4287: 4281: 4265: 4254: 4251: 4235: 4223: 4220: 4219: 4218: 4169: 4166: 4165: 4164: 4115: 4112: 4111: 4110: 4109: 4108: 4107: 4106: 4078: 4077: 4050:Washington, DC 4045: 4042: 4025: 4024: 3995: 3984: 3981: 3970:Kittybrewster 3895: 3889: 3878:Kittybrewster 3803: 3797: 3786:Kittybrewster 3711: 3705: 3694:Kittybrewster 3619: 3613: 3602:Kittybrewster 3527: 3521: 3519: 3516: 3515: 3514: 3513: 3512: 3511: 3510: 3509: 3508: 3426: 3421: 3401: 3398: 3363: 3362: 3357: 3355: 3353: 3348: 3346: 3340: 3339: 3335: 3334: 3329: 3327: 3325: 3322:Penistone Line 3320: 3313: 3311: 3306: 3303: 3302: 3299: 3297: 3287: 3285: 3274: 3273: 3272: 3269: 3237: 3234: 3233: 3232: 3203: 3200: 3199: 3198: 3158: 3155: 3062: 3059: 3043: 3032: 3029: 3006: 3003: 3002: 3001: 3000: 2999: 2987: 2984: 2962: 2961: 2945: 2944: 2937: 2936: 2912: 2909: 2897: 2886: 2881: 2880: 2879: 2878: 2877: 2861: 2860: 2778:Zachary Simons 2762: 2760:Zachary Simons 2756: 2742: 2741: 2738: 2731: 2728: 2725: 2722: 2719: 2712: 2711: 2671: 2666: 2652: 2649: 2541: 2538: 2521: 2520: 2491: 2480: 2477: 2460: 2459: 2430: 2419: 2416: 2415: 2414: 2398: 2361: 2358: 2357: 2356: 2322: 2319: 2318: 2317: 2273: 2272: 2214: 2213: 2204: 2202: 2191: 2188: 2187: 2186: 2185: 2184: 2161: 2160: 2131: 2130: 2101: 2090: 2087: 2086: 2085: 2055: 2045: 2044: 2043: 2042: 2041: 2040: 2039: 2038: 2037: 2018: 2017: 2016: 2015: 2014: 2013: 2012: 1968: 1964: 1955: 1954: 1953: 1952: 1951: 1950: 1931: 1930: 1929: 1928: 1913: 1893: 1892: 1891: 1890: 1883: 1882: 1881: 1880: 1873: 1872: 1871: 1870: 1858: 1857: 1842: 1804:Potter Stewart 1796: 1795: 1794: 1793: 1792: 1791: 1790: 1789: 1788: 1787: 1786: 1785: 1766: 1735: 1734: 1733: 1732: 1731: 1730: 1729: 1728: 1727: 1726: 1725: 1724: 1656: 1652: 1645: 1644: 1631: 1630: 1629: 1628: 1627: 1592: 1591: 1590: 1589: 1588: 1587: 1490: 1487: 1486: 1485: 1484: 1483: 1431: 1428: 1412: 1401: 1398: 1397: 1396: 1395: 1394: 1393: 1392: 1391: 1390: 1358: 1357: 1356: 1355: 1354: 1353: 1352: 1351: 1350: 1292: 1291: 1290: 1289: 1288: 1287: 1286: 1285: 1241: 1240: 1210: 1207: 1206: 1205: 1204: 1203: 1202: 1201: 1183: 1182: 1181: 1180: 1162: 1161: 1123: 1120: 1103: 1102: 1073: 1062: 1059: 1042: 1041: 1012: 1001: 998: 981: 962: 956: 939: 938: 909: 898: 895: 894: 893: 880: 879: 878: 877: 876: 875: 874: 873: 872: 871: 846: 845: 844: 843: 842: 841: 800: 768: 763: 746: 745: 716: 705: 702: 701: 700: 649: 646: 613:, we're doing 606: 603: 602: 601: 600: 599: 598: 597: 535: 529: 528: 527: 526: 525: 483: 482: 481: 480: 479: 381: 370: 369: 368: 347: 344: 328: 323:May 2008 issue 317: 314: 313: 312: 283: 280: 279: 278: 277: 276: 275: 274: 254: 253: 220: 217: 216: 211: 199: 189: 188: 183: 178: 173: 168: 163: 158: 153: 148: 143: 138: 133: 128: 123: 118: 113: 108: 103: 98: 93: 88: 83: 78: 73: 68: 63: 58: 53: 48: 43: 37: 28: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 5551: 5542: 5541: 5537: 5533: 5530:. Thank you. 5529: 5525: 5523: 5517: 5513: 5509: 5505: 5501: 5496: 5493: 5489: 5488: 5478: 5471: 5469: 5464: 5460: 5456: 5450: 5449: 5444: 5437: 5429: 5425: 5422: 5419: 5415: 5414: 5413: 5412: 5408: 5404: 5400: 5394: 5392: 5384: 5380: 5379: 5378: 5372: 5371: 5370:Did you know? 5366: 5362: 5358: 5355: 5351: 5350: 5344: 5340: 5337: 5334: 5330: 5329: 5328: 5327: 5324: 5317: 5314: 5308: 5306: 5304: 5300: 5296: 5288: 5287: 5278: 5272: 5269: 5265: 5264: 5263: 5260: 5257: 5253: 5252: 5251: 5250: 5247: 5239: 5236: 5234: 5231: 5230: 5226: 5220: 5216: 5212: 5208: 5207: 5206: 5203: 5200: 5196: 5195: 5194: 5193: 5189: 5185: 5181: 5177: 5173: 5169: 5165: 5161: 5157: 5153: 5152:Bakerloo line 5145: 5143: 5140: 5139: 5135: 5131: 5127: 5112: 5108: 5104: 5099: 5094: 5093: 5092: 5089: 5086: 5081: 5079: 5076: 5073: 5068: 5067: 5066: 5065: 5061: 5057: 5053: 5046: 5044: 5043: 5039: 5035: 5034:64.252.251.75 5023: 5019: 5015: 5011: 5010: 5009: 5005: 5001: 4997: 4996: 4995: 4992: 4989: 4985: 4984: 4983: 4982: 4978: 4974: 4967: 4966:Dan Debicella 4964: 4962: 4961: 4957: 4953: 4942: 4940: 4938: 4934: 4930: 4922: 4921: 4912: 4908: 4905: 4902: 4898: 4897: 4896: 4895: 4890: 4884: 4883: 4882: 4871: 4868: 4864: 4861: 4858: 4854: 4853: 4852: 4851: 4848: 4844: 4837: 4834: 4832: 4831: 4826: 4820: 4819: 4817: 4807: 4805: 4799: 4797: 4793: 4785: 4782: 4778: 4774: 4770: 4766: 4762: 4760: 4757: 4754: 4749: 4748: 4747: 4746: 4742: 4738: 4729: 4727: 4725: 4721: 4717: 4713: 4703: 4701: 4700: 4696: 4692: 4687: 4685: 4682: 4674: 4672: 4670: 4666: 4662: 4654: 4653: 4644: 4642: 4641: 4638: 4635: 4632: 4629:. Thank you. 4628: 4624: 4622: 4616: 4612: 4608: 4604: 4600: 4595: 4592: 4588: 4587: 4577: 4570: 4568: 4563: 4559: 4555: 4551: 4550: 4549: 4548: 4545: 4542: 4533: 4530: 4527: 4523: 4522: 4521: 4518: 4515: 4511: 4510: 4509: 4508: 4504: 4500: 4492: 4490: 4488: 4484: 4480: 4473: 4469: 4461: 4459: 4458: 4454: 4450: 4446: 4442: 4438: 4434: 4430: 4426: 4422: 4418: 4417:TheCatalyst31 4410: 4408: 4407: 4403: 4399: 4391: 4389: 4388: 4384: 4380: 4377:. Thank you. 4376: 4372: 4366: 4362: 4360: 4359: 4356: 4355:TheCatalyst31 4352: 4348: 4340: 4338: 4337: 4333: 4329: 4326:. Thank you. 4325: 4321: 4315: 4311: 4309: 4308: 4304: 4300: 4297:. Thank you. 4296: 4292: 4286: 4282: 4280: 4278: 4274: 4270: 4262: 4261: 4252: 4250: 4248: 4244: 4240: 4233: 4229: 4221: 4217: 4214: 4211: 4207: 4206: 4205: 4204: 4200: 4196: 4191: 4188: 4186: 4182: 4178: 4173: 4167: 4163: 4160: 4157: 4153: 4152: 4151: 4150: 4146: 4142: 4138: 4134: 4128: 4121: 4120:User:Year1989 4113: 4105: 4102: 4098: 4094: 4093: 4092: 4089: 4086: 4082: 4081: 4080: 4079: 4076: 4073: 4070: 4066: 4065: 4064: 4063: 4060: 4056: 4051: 4043: 4041: 4040: 4036: 4032: 4022: 4018: 4017: 4016: 4010: 4009: 4008:Did you know? 4004: 4000: 3996: 3993: 3989: 3988: 3982: 3980: 3979: 3976: 3971: 3968:. Thank you. 3967: 3960: 3956: 3952: 3948: 3944: 3940: 3935: 3927: 3923: 3919: 3915: 3911: 3907: 3902: 3894: 3890: 3888: 3887: 3884: 3879: 3876:. Thank you. 3875: 3868: 3864: 3860: 3856: 3852: 3848: 3843: 3835: 3831: 3827: 3823: 3819: 3815: 3810: 3802: 3798: 3796: 3795: 3792: 3787: 3784:. Thank you. 3783: 3776: 3772: 3768: 3764: 3760: 3756: 3751: 3743: 3739: 3735: 3731: 3727: 3723: 3718: 3710: 3706: 3704: 3703: 3700: 3695: 3692:. Thank you. 3691: 3684: 3680: 3676: 3672: 3668: 3664: 3659: 3651: 3647: 3643: 3639: 3635: 3631: 3626: 3618: 3614: 3612: 3611: 3608: 3603: 3600:. Thank you. 3599: 3592: 3588: 3584: 3580: 3576: 3572: 3567: 3559: 3555: 3551: 3547: 3543: 3539: 3534: 3526: 3522: 3517: 3507: 3503: 3499: 3495: 3491: 3487: 3486: 3485: 3482: 3479: 3475: 3474: 3473: 3469: 3465: 3461: 3456: 3455: 3454: 3451: 3448: 3444: 3443: 3442: 3441: 3437: 3433: 3425: 3422: 3420: 3419: 3415: 3411: 3407: 3399: 3397: 3396: 3393: 3390: 3383: 3373: 3360: 3352: 3345: 3341: 3336: 3332: 3323: 3318: 3317:Northern Rail 3309: 3304: 3300: 3298: 3296: 3295:National Rail 3292: 3288: 3286: 3283: 3282: 3279: 3278:Which gives: 3270: 3268: 3265: 3262: 3258: 3257: 3256: 3255: 3251: 3247: 3243: 3235: 3231: 3228: 3225: 3221: 3220: 3219: 3218: 3214: 3210: 3201: 3197: 3194: 3191: 3187: 3186: 3185: 3184: 3180: 3176: 3172: 3168: 3164: 3156: 3154: 3153: 3148: 3144: 3140: 3136: 3132: 3127: 3123: 3119: 3115: 3111: 3107: 3103: 3099: 3096: 3092: 3088: 3084: 3080: 3076: 3072: 3068: 3060: 3058: 3056: 3052: 3048: 3040: 3039: 3030: 3028: 3027: 3024: 3020: 3016: 3012: 3004: 2998: 2995: 2992: 2988: 2985: 2982: 2981: 2980: 2976: 2972: 2968: 2964: 2963: 2960: 2957: 2954: 2950: 2949: 2948: 2942: 2941: 2940: 2934: 2930: 2929: 2928: 2927: 2923: 2919: 2911:s-rail routes 2910: 2908: 2907: 2903: 2902:Contributions 2900: 2896: 2892: 2885: 2882: 2876: 2873: 2870: 2865: 2864: 2863: 2862: 2859: 2856: 2854: 2853: 2846: 2842: 2841: 2840: 2839: 2836: 2834: 2833: 2826: 2822: 2818: 2814: 2809: 2807: 2806:its talk page 2799: 2791: 2787: 2783: 2779: 2775: 2767: 2761: 2757: 2755: 2754: 2750: 2746: 2739: 2736: 2732: 2729: 2726: 2723: 2720: 2717: 2716: 2715: 2709: 2708: 2707: 2706: 2703: 2702: 2679: 2678: 2670: 2667: 2665: 2664: 2661: 2657: 2650: 2648: 2647: 2644: 2641: 2638: 2635:. Thank you. 2634: 2630: 2628: 2622: 2618: 2614: 2610: 2606: 2601: 2599: 2595: 2589: 2583: 2579: 2572: 2564: 2561: 2557: 2556: 2546: 2539: 2537: 2536: 2532: 2528: 2518: 2514: 2513: 2512: 2506: 2505: 2504:Did you know? 2500: 2496: 2492: 2489: 2485: 2484: 2478: 2476: 2475: 2472: 2467: 2457: 2453: 2452: 2451: 2445: 2444: 2443:Did you know? 2439: 2435: 2431: 2428: 2424: 2423: 2417: 2413: 2410: 2407: 2403: 2399: 2397: 2394: 2391: 2387: 2383: 2379: 2378: 2377: 2376: 2372: 2368: 2359: 2355: 2352: 2349: 2345: 2344: 2343: 2342: 2338: 2334: 2329: 2327: 2320: 2316: 2312: 2308: 2303: 2296: 2289: 2285: 2281: 2277: 2276: 2271: 2267: 2263: 2259: 2258:Scotland Yard 2255: 2252: 2249: 2246: 2242: 2239: 2236: 2233: 2229: 2226: 2223: 2220: 2216: 2215: 2212: 2210: 2205: 2200: 2195: 2189: 2183: 2180: 2175: 2169: 2165: 2164: 2163: 2162: 2159: 2156: 2153: 2149: 2148: 2147: 2146: 2142: 2138: 2128: 2124: 2123: 2122: 2116: 2115: 2114:Did you know? 2110: 2106: 2102: 2099: 2095: 2094: 2088: 2084: 2081: 2078: 2074: 2073: 2072: 2071: 2067: 2063: 2059: 2054: 2050: 2046: 2036: 2032: 2028: 2024: 2019: 2011: 2008: 2005: 2001: 2000: 1998: 1997: 1994: 1986: 1985: 1984: 1983: 1982: 1981: 1980: 1977: 1974: 1969: 1965: 1961: 1960: 1959: 1958: 1957: 1956: 1949: 1945: 1944: 1937: 1936: 1935: 1934: 1933: 1932: 1927: 1923: 1919: 1914: 1910: 1909: 1908: 1907: 1906: 1905: 1901: 1900: 1887: 1886: 1885: 1884: 1877: 1876: 1875: 1874: 1867: 1862: 1861: 1860: 1859: 1856: 1852: 1848: 1843: 1839: 1838: 1837: 1836: 1833: 1830: 1825: 1822: 1816: 1813: 1807: 1805: 1800: 1784: 1780: 1776: 1772: 1771:raison d'être 1767: 1764: 1760: 1756: 1751: 1747: 1746: 1745: 1744: 1743: 1742: 1741: 1740: 1739: 1738: 1737: 1736: 1723: 1720: 1716: 1715: 1714: 1711: 1707: 1703: 1699: 1695: 1694: 1693: 1690: 1685: 1684: 1683: 1680: 1677: 1672: 1671: 1670: 1666: 1662: 1657: 1653: 1649: 1648: 1647: 1646: 1643: 1640: 1637: 1632: 1626: 1623: 1620:Wrong model. 1619: 1618: 1617: 1614: 1610: 1609: 1608: 1605: 1602: 1598: 1594: 1593: 1586: 1583: 1578: 1574: 1570: 1566: 1562: 1558: 1553: 1552: 1551: 1548: 1544: 1540: 1536: 1535: 1534: 1531: 1528: 1523: 1522: 1521: 1520: 1517: 1513: 1508: 1507: 1503: 1499: 1494: 1488: 1482: 1479: 1478: 1471: 1470: 1469: 1466: 1463: 1459: 1458: 1457: 1456: 1453: 1452: 1445: 1441: 1437: 1429: 1427: 1425: 1421: 1417: 1409: 1408: 1399: 1389: 1385: 1381: 1377: 1376: 1375: 1372: 1369: 1364: 1359: 1349: 1346: 1343: 1338: 1337: 1335: 1332: 1328: 1324: 1323: 1322: 1318: 1314: 1310: 1306: 1302: 1301: 1300: 1299: 1298: 1297: 1296: 1295: 1294: 1293: 1283: 1280: 1276: 1271: 1270: 1269: 1268: 1267: 1263: 1259: 1254: 1250: 1245: 1244: 1243: 1242: 1239: 1236: 1233: 1228: 1227: 1226: 1225: 1221: 1217: 1208: 1200: 1197: 1194: 1189: 1188: 1187: 1186: 1185: 1184: 1179: 1175: 1171: 1166: 1165: 1164: 1163: 1160: 1157: 1154: 1149: 1148: 1147: 1146: 1142: 1138: 1134: 1133:George Orwell 1130: 1121: 1119: 1118: 1114: 1110: 1100: 1096: 1095: 1094: 1088: 1087: 1086:Did you know? 1082: 1078: 1074: 1071: 1067: 1066: 1060: 1058: 1057: 1053: 1049: 1039: 1035: 1034: 1033: 1027: 1026: 1025:Did you know? 1021: 1017: 1013: 1010: 1006: 1005: 999: 997: 996: 992: 988: 983: 978: 974: 972: 968: 961: 957: 955: 954: 950: 946: 936: 932: 931: 930: 924: 923: 922:Did you know? 918: 914: 910: 907: 903: 902: 896: 892: 889: 885: 882: 881: 870: 867: 863: 862: 861: 858: 854: 853: 852: 851: 850: 849: 848: 847: 840: 837: 834: 830: 829: 828: 825: 822:new ideas. -- 821: 817: 816: 815: 812: 809: 805: 801: 799: 796: 793: 789: 785: 781: 780: 779: 778: 775: 767: 762: 761: 757: 753: 743: 739: 738: 737: 731: 730: 729:Did you know? 725: 721: 717: 714: 710: 709: 703: 699: 696: 693: 688: 683: 682: 681: 680: 676: 672: 666: 664: 660: 656: 647: 645: 644: 640: 636: 632: 628: 624: 620: 616: 612: 604: 596: 593: 590: 586: 585: 584: 580: 576: 572: 568: 567: 566: 563: 560: 556: 555: 554: 553: 549: 545: 541: 533: 530: 524: 521: 518: 514: 513: 512: 508: 504: 500: 496: 492: 488: 484: 478: 475: 472: 467: 466: 465: 461: 457: 453: 449: 448: 447: 444: 441: 434: 427: 422: 421: 420: 419: 415: 411: 404: 394: 387: 377: 371: 367: 364: 361: 357: 356:this category 353: 352: 351: 345: 343: 341: 337: 333: 325: 324: 315: 311: 308: 305: 301: 300: 299: 298: 294: 290: 281: 273: 269: 265: 260: 259: 258: 257: 256: 255: 252: 249: 246: 241: 240: 239: 238: 234: 230: 226: 218: 215: 210: 208: 204: 194: 187: 184: 182: 179: 177: 174: 172: 169: 167: 164: 162: 159: 157: 154: 152: 149: 147: 144: 142: 139: 137: 134: 132: 129: 127: 124: 122: 119: 117: 114: 112: 109: 107: 104: 102: 99: 97: 94: 92: 89: 87: 84: 82: 79: 77: 74: 72: 69: 67: 64: 62: 59: 57: 54: 52: 49: 47: 44: 42: 39: 38: 36: 35: 30: 29:Solicitation 19: 5519: 5503: 5497: 5485: 5483: 5467: 5447: 5441: 5398: 5390: 5375: 5374: 5368: 5318: 5315: 5312: 5284: 5282: 5242: 5149: 5141: 5122: 5097: 5050: 5030: 4970: 4946: 4918: 4916: 4880: 4879: 4874: 4840: 4815: 4814: 4808: 4800: 4788: 4733: 4707: 4688: 4678: 4650: 4648: 4618: 4602: 4596: 4584: 4582: 4566: 4538: 4496: 4465: 4444: 4414: 4395: 4369: 4344: 4318: 4289: 4258: 4256: 4225: 4192: 4189: 4174: 4171: 4117: 4054: 4047: 4028: 4013: 4012: 4006: 3897: 3805: 3713: 3621: 3529: 3428: 3403: 3366: 3343: 3277: 3239: 3205: 3162: 3160: 3126:TonyTheTiger 3064: 3036: 3034: 3008: 2946: 2938: 2914: 2888: 2851: 2850: 2831: 2830: 2810: 2771: 2743: 2713: 2682: 2675: 2673: 2654: 2624: 2608: 2602: 2565: 2553: 2551: 2524: 2509: 2508: 2502: 2466:PeterSymonds 2463: 2448: 2447: 2441: 2381: 2363: 2330: 2324: 2206: 2134: 2119: 2118: 2112: 2057: 2047:Time to get 1988: 1942: 1898: 1894: 1865: 1826: 1820: 1817: 1811: 1808: 1801: 1797: 1770: 1762: 1749: 1596: 1576: 1572: 1568: 1564: 1560: 1556: 1538: 1509: 1492: 1473: 1447: 1433: 1405: 1403: 1362: 1253:this project 1252: 1212: 1125: 1106: 1091: 1090: 1084: 1045: 1032:Eddie Bonine 1030: 1029: 1023: 1000:Eddie Bonine 984: 975: 964: 942: 929:Kyle Pearson 927: 926: 920: 819: 770: 749: 736:Howard Pease 734: 733: 727: 704:Howard Pease 686: 667: 662: 658: 653: 651: 627:Good article 608: 571:Central line 537: 451: 425: 383: 349: 321: 319: 285: 222: 212: 202: 200: 120: 33: 32: 26: 5361:11 December 4943:ludwig beck 4710:—Preceding 4172:Greetings! 4031:Victuallers 4015:Gary Glover 3498:NatureBoyMD 3490:NatureBoyMD 3464:NatureBoyMD 3432:NatureBoyMD 3236:s-rail uses 2400:Discussion 1759:User:Bstone 1489:Good grief? 1093:Ian Ostlund 1061:Ian Ostlund 786:; see also 687:Times-Union 671:Daniel Case 635:Nehrams2020 619:GA criteria 575:Sunil060902 544:Sunil060902 4804:SlimVirgin 4675:Frustrated 4435:stations, 4431:stations, 4055:status quo 3331:Stocksmoor 3308:Denby Dale 3143:WP:CHICAGO 3067:WP:CHICAGO 3061:WP:CHICAGO 3011:previously 2891:historical 2798:dated prod 2280:WP:DYKLIST 1971:the ring. 1866:right side 985:Thanks. -- 623:Icelanders 493:articles. 5532:Rettetast 5500:this link 5492:copyright 5418:Mackensen 5333:Mackensen 5256:Mackensen 5199:Mackensen 5176:Hatch End 5085:Mackensen 5072:Mackensen 4988:Mackensen 4901:Mackensen 4857:Mackensen 4769:Keith-264 4753:Mackensen 4737:Keith-264 4599:this link 4591:copyright 4541:Mackensen 4526:Mackensen 4514:Mackensen 4472:vote here 4210:Mackensen 4181:CheckUser 4156:Mackensen 4069:Mackensen 4059:Jehochman 3999:20 August 3478:Mackensen 3447:Mackensen 3389:Mackensen 3261:Mackensen 3224:Mackensen 3190:Mackensen 2991:Mackensen 2953:Mackensen 2869:Mackensen 2852:Wizardman 2832:Wizardman 2825:consensus 2605:this link 2571:GFDL-self 2560:copyright 2527:BorgQueen 2406:Mackensen 2390:Mackensen 2348:Mackensen 2152:Mackensen 2137:BorgQueen 2077:Mackensen 2004:Mackensen 1992:brenneman 1973:Mackensen 1829:Mackensen 1676:Mackensen 1636:Mackensen 1601:Mackensen 1527:Mackensen 1462:Mackensen 1444:128 pages 1430:Apologies 1380:MZMcBride 1368:Mackensen 1342:Mackensen 1313:MZMcBride 1258:MZMcBride 1232:Mackensen 1216:MZMcBride 1193:Mackensen 1153:Mackensen 1109:BorgQueen 1048:BorgQueen 987:MZMcBride 833:Mackensen 808:Mackensen 792:Mackensen 752:BorgQueen 692:Mackensen 589:Mackensen 559:Mackensen 517:Mackensen 471:Mackensen 440:Mackensen 403:rail line 360:Mackensen 304:Mackensen 245:Mackensen 5522:48 hours 5295:BrownBot 5227:James F. 5103:JayHenry 5056:JayHenry 4929:BrownBot 4881:Kanonkas 4712:unsigned 4661:BrownBot 4621:48 hours 4479:BrownBot 4269:BrownBot 4239:BrownBot 4185:userpage 4141:RFBailey 3351:L&YR 3344:Terminus 3246:Year1989 3047:BrownBot 2971:Year1989 2918:Year1989 2660:Thatcher 2627:48 hours 2307:JayHenry 2302:JayHenry 2288:Arbcom-l 2286:in the " 2262:JayHenry 1710:Thatcher 1622:Thatcher 1416:BrownBot 1327:Bishonen 1275:Bishonen 1170:JayHenry 1137:JayHenry 884:*guffaw* 866:Thatcher 857:Thatcher 503:Year1989 456:RFBailey 410:RFBailey 332:BrownBot 5518:) then 4952:Miletus 4691:Rjecina 4617:) then 4554:RobDe68 4499:RobDe68 4398:Rjd0060 3947:history 3914:history 3855:history 3822:history 3763:history 3730:history 3671:history 3638:history 3579:history 3546:history 3359:Shelley 3167:African 3147:WP:LOTM 3110:WP:FPOC 3102:WP:FLRC 3005:Meetup? 2623:) then 2495:12 July 2434:11 July 2367:Jackal4 2243:; from 2207:The 25 2053:WP:CENT 2023:WP:DEVO 1674:can't. 1476:MBisanz 1450:MBisanz 945:Circeus 913:30 June 720:28 June 657:article 487:Bamford 386:WT:RAIL 207:shotgun 203:with me 196:The Eye 5455:Risker 5453:Best, 5421:(talk) 5403:Risker 5336:(talk) 5322:amicon 5259:(talk) 5202:(talk) 5178:, and 5168:Bushey 5130:Risker 5098:anyone 5088:(talk) 5075:(talk) 5047:Trains 4991:(talk) 4904:(talk) 4860:(talk) 4756:(talk) 4637:Profil 4544:(talk) 4529:(talk) 4517:(talk) 4341:Thanks 4213:(talk) 4159:(talk) 4127:s-rail 4088:(talk) 4072:(talk) 3481:(talk) 3450:(talk) 3410:Craigy 3392:(talk) 3264:(talk) 3227:(talk) 3193:(talk) 3163:Delete 3118:WP:AFD 3116:, and 3114:WP:FPC 3106:WP:FTC 3098:WP:FLC 3095:WP:GAC 3091:WP:GAR 3087:WP:FAR 3083:WP:FAC 2994:(talk) 2956:(talk) 2872:(talk) 2788:" and 2596:. See 2470:(talk) 2409:(talk) 2393:(talk) 2386:WP:CFD 2351:(talk) 2178:matrix 2155:(talk) 2105:7 July 2080:(talk) 2062:Risker 2027:Risker 2007:(talk) 1976:(talk) 1943:Avruch 1918:Risker 1899:Avruch 1847:Risker 1832:(talk) 1775:Risker 1679:(talk) 1661:Risker 1639:(talk) 1604:(talk) 1543:WP:AGF 1530:(talk) 1498:Risker 1465:(talk) 1371:(talk) 1345:(talk) 1235:(talk) 1196:(talk) 1156:(talk) 1077:2 July 1016:2 July 836:(talk) 811:(talk) 795:(talk) 695:(talk) 661:". Or 615:sweeps 592:(talk) 562:(talk) 534:s-rail 520:(talk) 474:(talk) 443:(talk) 393:s-rail 376:s-rail 363:(talk) 307:(talk) 282:Revert 264:Risker 248:(talk) 229:Risker 5514:(per 5309:Email 4948:know. 4888:Talk 4818:levse 4631:Lokal 4613:(per 4449:DanTD 4421:Metra 4195:Fluff 4177:Fluff 3955:watch 3951:links 3922:watch 3918:links 3863:watch 3859:links 3830:watch 3826:links 3771:watch 3767:links 3738:watch 3734:links 3679:watch 3675:links 3646:watch 3642:links 3587:watch 3583:links 3554:watch 3550:links 3171:Asian 3079:WP:PR 2619:(per 2211:Medal 2051:onto 1963:seat. 1719:Irpen 1689:Irpen 1613:Irpen 1582:Irpen 1569:blehs 1547:Irpen 1516:Irpen 1122:Faith 888:Jenny 824:Jenny 774:Jenny 491:Edale 426:could 16:< 5536:talk 5459:talk 5407:talk 5365:2008 5299:talk 5290:you. 5283:The 5268:jc37 5246:jc37 5215:talk 5188:talk 5162:and 5134:talk 5126:here 5107:talk 5060:talk 5038:talk 5018:talk 5004:talk 4977:talk 4956:talk 4933:talk 4924:you. 4917:The 4845:. -- 4824:Talk 4773:talk 4741:talk 4720:talk 4695:talk 4681:camp 4665:talk 4656:you. 4649:The 4558:talk 4503:talk 4483:talk 4453:talk 4402:talk 4383:talk 4379:Bazj 4332:talk 4328:Bazj 4303:talk 4299:Bazj 4273:talk 4264:you. 4257:The 4243:talk 4232:here 4226:The 4199:talk 4175:I'm 4145:talk 4137:here 4135:and 4133:here 4101:Talk 4035:talk 4003:2008 3959:logs 3943:talk 3939:edit 3926:logs 3910:talk 3906:edit 3867:logs 3851:talk 3847:edit 3834:logs 3818:talk 3814:edit 3775:logs 3759:talk 3755:edit 3742:logs 3726:talk 3722:edit 3683:logs 3667:talk 3663:edit 3650:logs 3634:talk 3630:edit 3591:logs 3575:talk 3571:edit 3558:logs 3542:talk 3538:edit 3502:talk 3494:talk 3468:talk 3436:talk 3414:talk 3406:here 3250:talk 3213:talk 3179:talk 3169:and 3051:talk 3042:you. 3035:The 3023:talk 2975:talk 2922:talk 2899:Talk 2749:talk 2677:here 2640:sama 2578:GFDL 2531:talk 2499:2008 2438:2008 2402:here 2371:talk 2337:talk 2333:Kylu 2311:talk 2266:talk 2173:Mind 2141:talk 2109:2008 2066:talk 2031:talk 1922:talk 1851:talk 1779:talk 1763:then 1750:have 1665:talk 1573:mehs 1571:and 1512:this 1502:talk 1440:tone 1420:talk 1411:you. 1404:The 1384:talk 1331:talk 1317:talk 1309:this 1307:and 1305:this 1279:talk 1262:talk 1220:talk 1174:talk 1141:talk 1135:. -- 1131:and 1113:talk 1081:2008 1052:talk 1020:2008 991:talk 949:talk 917:2008 820:sane 756:talk 724:2008 675:talk 639:talk 579:talk 548:talk 507:talk 489:and 460:talk 452:have 414:talk 336:talk 327:you. 320:The 293:talk 289:Ripe 268:talk 233:talk 225:this 5395:Yes 5359:On 5014:JNW 5000:JNW 4973:JNW 4847:NE2 4798:. 4445:did 3997:On 3209:JRG 3139:bio 3073:or 3019:Dan 2493:On 2432:On 2382:did 2380:It 2300:by 2284:Sam 2256:to 2230:to 2222:ilr 2209:DYK 2103:On 1821:IRC 1704:or 1565:are 1510:To 1363:has 1075:On 1014:On 982:). 911:On 718:On 5538:) 5502:. 5461:) 5409:) 5385:. 5367:, 5363:, 5301:) 5217:) 5190:) 5174:, 5170:, 5136:) 5109:) 5062:) 5040:) 5020:) 5006:) 4979:) 4958:) 4935:) 4885:: 4827:• 4821:• 4812:— 4775:) 4743:) 4722:) 4697:) 4686:? 4667:) 4601:. 4560:) 4505:) 4485:) 4455:) 4404:) 4385:) 4349:, 4334:) 4305:) 4275:) 4245:) 4201:) 4147:) 4130:}} 4124:{{ 4099:| 4097:HG 4057:. 4037:) 4029:-- 4023:. 4005:, 4001:, 3957:| 3953:| 3949:| 3945:| 3941:| 3924:| 3920:| 3916:| 3912:| 3908:| 3865:| 3861:| 3857:| 3853:| 3849:| 3832:| 3828:| 3824:| 3820:| 3816:| 3773:| 3769:| 3765:| 3761:| 3757:| 3740:| 3736:| 3732:| 3728:| 3724:| 3681:| 3677:| 3673:| 3669:| 3665:| 3648:| 3644:| 3640:| 3636:| 3632:| 3589:| 3585:| 3581:| 3577:| 3573:| 3556:| 3552:| 3548:| 3544:| 3540:| 3504:) 3470:) 3438:) 3416:) 3387:. 3385:}} 3379:{{ 3375:}} 3369:{{ 3252:) 3215:) 3181:) 3149:) 3112:, 3108:, 3104:, 3100:, 3093:, 3089:, 3085:, 3081:, 3053:) 3021:| 2977:) 2924:) 2808:. 2801:}} 2795:{{ 2772:A 2751:) 2700:te 2698:ai 2696:hw 2694:et 2692:tl 2690:os 2686:an 2684:Ry 2658:. 2607:. 2586:{{ 2574:}} 2568:{{ 2533:) 2525:-- 2519:. 2501:, 2497:, 2458:. 2440:, 2436:, 2373:) 2339:) 2313:) 2305:-- 2298:}} 2292:{{ 2268:) 2254:an 2251:ig 2248:ch 2245:Mi 2241:ll 2238:ba 2235:se 2232:ba 2228:ds 2225:oa 2219:ra 2143:) 2129:. 2111:, 2107:, 2068:) 2033:) 1924:) 1853:) 1781:) 1700:, 1687:-- 1667:) 1561:is 1541:. 1504:) 1422:) 1386:) 1336:. 1329:| 1319:) 1277:| 1264:) 1222:) 1176:) 1143:) 1115:) 1107:-- 1101:. 1083:, 1079:, 1054:) 1046:-- 1040:. 1022:, 1018:, 993:) 951:) 943:-- 937:. 919:, 915:, 886:-- 806:. 772:-- 758:) 750:-- 744:. 726:, 722:, 677:) 641:) 581:) 550:) 509:) 501:. 462:) 436:}} 430:{{ 416:) 406:}} 400:{{ 396:}} 390:{{ 379:}} 373:{{ 338:) 295:) 270:) 235:) 209:. 27:No 5534:( 5457:( 5405:( 5297:( 5213:( 5186:( 5132:( 5105:( 5058:( 5036:( 5016:( 5002:( 4975:( 4954:( 4931:( 4816:R 4771:( 4739:( 4718:( 4693:( 4663:( 4634:_ 4556:( 4501:( 4481:( 4451:( 4400:( 4381:( 4330:( 4301:( 4271:( 4241:( 4197:( 4193:/ 4143:( 4033:( 3974:☎ 3961:) 3937:( 3928:) 3904:( 3882:☎ 3869:) 3845:( 3836:) 3812:( 3790:☎ 3777:) 3753:( 3744:) 3720:( 3698:☎ 3685:) 3661:( 3652:) 3628:( 3606:☎ 3593:) 3569:( 3560:) 3536:( 3500:( 3492:( 3466:( 3462:- 3434:( 3430:- 3412:( 3248:( 3211:( 3177:( 3145:/ 3141:/ 3137:/ 3135:c 3133:/ 3131:t 3129:( 3049:( 2989:- 2973:( 2920:( 2747:( 2688:P 2643:K 2637:O 2529:( 2369:( 2335:( 2309:( 2264:( 2139:( 2064:( 2029:( 1920:( 1849:( 1777:( 1663:( 1500:( 1418:( 1382:( 1315:( 1284:. 1260:( 1218:( 1172:( 1139:( 1111:( 1050:( 989:( 977:( 947:( 754:( 673:( 637:( 577:( 546:( 505:( 458:( 412:( 334:( 291:( 266:( 231:(

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index