User talk:Mackensen/Archive27

1933: 1132:(c.f) an Auditory Display (c.f.) He is responsible for the formation of ICAD (c.f.) and remains an emeritus member of its Board, which, amongst other things, has run 20 annual international conferences on the now generally considered crucial field for the discovery of gravity waves etc. As the entry says, he published the first book in the field, and is the most heavily referenced author in it. I do not believe your deletion is warranted without further justification. Please Undelete. PS. How do I even get access to it at this stage? 3074: 229: 3550:{{s-start}} {{s-rail|title=Tokyo Metro}} {{s-line|system=Seibu Railway|line=S-Train|previous=Ikebukuro|note={{TSSN|F|09|size=25}}|next=Shibuya|note2={{TSSN|F|16|size=25}}|type2=Motomachi-Chukagai|notemid=(weekends and national holidays)}} {{s-end}} {{s-start}} {{s-rail|title=Seibu Railway}} {{s-line|system=Seibu Railway|line=S-Train|previous=Tokorozawa|note={{SBSN|SI|17|size=25}}|next=Ikebukuro|note2={{TSSN|F|09|size=25}}|type2=Motomachi-Chukagai|notemid=(weekends and national holidays)}} {{s-end}} 5616: 5476: 5140: 4813: 4565: 3620: 3409: 2976: 2878: 2606: 2292: 874: 748: 476: 420: 1315: 680: 3081: 5023: 4922: 4274: 2767: 3310: 2724: 1926: 3110:. These can be illustrated with thousands of its recently-released images of public domain artworks available for Knowledge (XXG) and Wikimedia Commons from the museum’s collection spanning 5,000 years of art. The event is an opportunity for Wikimedia communities to engage The Met's diverse Asian collections onsite and remotely. Asia Art Archive will host a sister event in Hong Kong next week. 2210: 2105: 1198:. Now, to the point you make. You say that "most of the content was apparently copied..." apparent, perhaps, but not in fact, as I explained in the discussion with Diannaa. You further say that "The remaining part of the article was sourced entirely to his own writings, and it read like a blurb." With respect, that is simply not true, as a cursory look at Knowledge (XXG)'s entries on 4378: 4182: 3888:, since they are used like proper names (never translated); not necessarily for the station's name ("Lucerne railway station"), since these are two different things, though very closely related. However, the stop name on any official timetable will always stay the same, in whichever language region you are. Indeed helpful for any public transport user. What do you think? -- 4026: 2029: 1919: 1242:- I think it dropped a number of stations (including Windsor) just a few years before. It's additionally confusing because (unlike the Eastern and Midwest roads I'm used to), the NWP never had much of an effect on the location of population centers. Note for example Millers station in the 1915 timetable - it appears to have been a flag stop serving a single house. 4763: 1218:

text he wrote on which to base my initial sketch, which, unbeknown to him, he seems to no longer holds copyright on does not pass unnoticed. It seems the only way forward is to write a more extensive article in which the small piece of factual information I have used is eclipsed by a bigger picture. I will proceed as you suggest. Regards,

4806: 2599: 867: 3262:

copyright issues, Google would be making the whole thing viewable. I don't believe "not being available anymore publicly" makes a case for posting copies online under fair use. In the case of this specific resource, the copyright holder wasn't amused either and sent one of those websites a cease and desist.

1131:

Hi. You deleted my article in process of markup on Gremory Kramer on the basis of paragraph A7. This is not understandable, if you read the history of the person, as amplified in the second half of the article. He is THE seminal and historically most important figure it the field of data sonification

1005:

well shucks, but clearly that's not the case. I just don't suffer fools gladly, like the some of the rest of the people here who appear to have taken over the asylum. I'll gladly withdraw my dozen or so FAs, 100+ FLs, around 200 GAs etc, and the 1800+ errors I've picked up on the main page in the

5219:

I have overhauled the module, replacing sporadic former services with branches and former branches. I have kept your reversal of the Congress branch intact, but I will be keeping branch names away from current services. They are redundant to the line parameter of the station infoboxes (save Ashland,

1217:

and/or biographical pages, bearing in mind I am an occasional contributor with good intent. IMO, the polite professional approach should have been to engage with me and perhaps advise me to mark the entry as Draft, or some other such process. In any event, the irony of the Subject providing me with

2251:

and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion

2146:

1327:

Thanks alot sir, I'm glad that you responded so fast towards my article creation. And also you guide me that I didn't do any mistake by creating an article on any delete article. But I will rectify my mistake. If I ever created an article on a previous delete page would definitely take assistance

3495:

I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it.

2025:

The disruptive edits pushing the non-encyclopedic term "Higher Speed Rail" need to end. This is a long running debate & it's well accepted and known that High Speed Rail ( HSR ) is not only valid but the term to use in the contect of Knowledge (XXG). If you're writing a PhD thesis for some

3261:

I am not so certain. That might be so if it was a "snippet" preview, but I'd be inclined to say otherwise on a website that is a repository of a bunch of full scanned PDFs of manuals. One of those pages contained full scan of a journal, which offers no preview on Google Books. If it wasn't of

3492:, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at the English Knowledge (XXG). 1100:

Actually no, it's about an abuse of position using personal attacks in closing discussions, but you're in the club and I'm not, so there you go. And no, the grave-diggers have got the shovel for the moment, so you'll have to wait. But anyway, have a wonderful Monday, richly deserved.

5220:

Cermak, East 63rd). Pre-1993 branches that have not changed significantly over their service-operating history will also display current colors. I'll also keep the Loop Shuttle intact, since it's a lot easier to navigate to the old Randolph and Madison stations that way.

3244:

Okay, I see what you're referring to. That's bad wording on the guideline page, but my other point stands. Linking out to scanned manuals of locomotives that are no longer sold, where that website is not profiting in any way, is almost certainly permissible fair use.

1528:

We'll be better off by keeping the numbers, as there are quite a few cases of named trains jumping from line to line (icons distinguished by color), and even some cases of jumping from company to company (icons distinguished by shape). Two examples of the latter are

2793:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

627:

I don't think a G7 would be appropriate in many of these cases. The individual author aside, the templates are effectively all part of a group, and the deletion nomination serves as notice to the broader group of trains editors that the migration is complete.

3702: 3226:

That discussion doesn't appear to support the action that you took on the EMD F7 article. It might be appropriate to remove the direct link and convert it into an unlinked citation. I would note that the overarching guideline on external links, of which

1472:

Will adjacent stations be able to handle Japan's new-ish trend of slapping a number on every station? As well as how there is a mix of lines with different local/express services, as well as independent trains (denoted in italics per usual). (here's an

378:

Since November 2018, six administrator accounts have been compromised and temporarily desysopped. In an effort to help improve account security, our intention was to remind administrators of existing policies on account security — that they are

3802:

Hi there, just wanted to let you know I undid your removal of the game summary section. While the game didn't officially count, some play did take place, so I think we should keep the summary. If I'm wrong I'm open to hearing feedback. Thanks!

2556:

Yeah, that is generally true. There are a few instances (I'm encountering one where several block-long BART stations have two F Market & Wharves stops above them at either end) where the ability not to link would be more useful than not.

1356:

with Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported and GNU Free Documentation License (ticket #2019070110001636.) I have also added "OTRS pending" template to the talk page. Can I get the page restored while the license is reviewed?

4110:

I feel like that should be consolidated to Rock Island Lines for this stuff. I get the official name and all, but that's incredibly long to use. (Not a fan the station titles use that either.) Thanks though. Also, I have echo turned off. ;)

3231:

is a part, specifically says "This guideline does not apply to inline citations or general references". Beyond all this, it's not entirely clear that the operator manuals for the F7, and other locomotives, are even still under copyright.

213:

Unsigned messages will be ignored. You can sign your messages with four tildes (~~~~). I reserve the right to disruptively eliminate gigantic blobs of wiki-markup from signatures on a whim if I think they're cluttering up my talk page.

5566:

Harv thing, my eyesight on not the best screen (im on the road) and I'd thought I'd triple checked ... eyeballs still didnt managed to catch it. Probably should have checked the template source. Thanks for picking up my typos ....

4063: 306:. In the past, the Committee often resysopped admin accounts as a matter of course once the admin was back in control of their account. The committee has updated its guidelines. Admins may now be required to undergo a fresh 3541:

serves the S-Train, a named train that operates continuously between the Tokyo Metro and other commuter rail companies. The operators switch out at their respective transfer points, so I was wondering if there's a way with

1755:

Two options, as with s-line. You can override it manually with to-left and to-right, or define a type (similar to s-line's branch) and do it that way. I think the latter only makes since for different physical branches.

1210:, none of which were written by me or the Subject, will easily attest. You will note, for example that his groundbreaking book is referenced on all sites. To describe it as a "blurb" is ill-informed, to put it politely. 3353: 2797:

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

4091: 1505:

Yikes. The numbers are a challenge. My inclination is to say that the numbers shouldn't be displayed in succession boxes, and that it's enough to display them in the station header. In the alternative, the

1420:

It is, but a copyright violation will still be deleted. Given the way the GFDL works, having a draft move into the article namespace with copyright violations in its history would be a significant problem.

1379:

The text as written is promotional in tone (understandably) and probably wouldn't be suitable for inclusion "as is" even without the copyright issue. You'd be better off rewriting it from reliable sources.

1040:

No, I'm not looking for your help in anything. My experience and quality here transcends any "advice" you could offer. But cheers for the personal attack in the ANI closure. Great work, proud moment.

4832:

Together, we'll expand Knowledge (XXG) articles on American history and art, and the understanding that all communities bring to American culture, as reflected in the Met collection up until ca. 1900.

3337:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 5693: