User talk:MartinPoulter/Archive 2

771:

a very hard time, I made an edit concerning the reference: " Among the private papers quoted in the book are a letter written by Hubbard to the FBI denouncing his wife as a Soviet spy, another in which he tells his daughter he is not really her father and an internal letter in which he suggests that Scientology should pursue religious status for business reasons.[12" in Background and synopsis. This is a lousy synopsis and its the opinion of a lawyer in a losing case in the US reported in the Washington Post. If you check you can see my edits of 14 June and 18 June which were arbitrarily deleted by Prioryman and Andrewman327. With regard to the first my point was that was not what was in the book. And the second, I don't see that saying that sources include "embittered Scientologists" is any different to saying that sources include FoI and stolen personal documents. It is fact not opinion. I made a few edits to the page in response to demonstrate how I felt I was being treated and have been accused by Prioryman of "disruptive editing" "June 2013" on my talk page.

2271:

well-respected and valued editor like myself (we joined in 2006 as well). Unfortunately, while I partly agree with some of the consensuses regarding the templates, I still felt that we did not get a consensus on Template talk:Bullying and this discussion has went on long enough, hence that's why I had to raise the RFC on this template's link inclusion matter. After that, it became clear that there is consensus against inclusion, but it can always change later. I don't know if we do need a closure on the RFC on psychology templates, since I felt that we gained a limited number of consensus amongst some editors, but I think we might and we can always come back to it later (

1174:

Apparently a difference between UK and US intellectual property law allows that. So until somebody scans the journals and releases those scans to the public domain, we won't get the benefit. However, the discussion did set off a dialogue about ways we can work together, maybe in getting access to specific bits of content. You're right about the British Library books project: that will release a great deal of content in a truly public domain manner. BL are in a position to do this because they actually own the books rather than licensing scans. I'll see what I can do to help you with the Gall-Peters projection article.

901:, Penbat was constantly wikihounded by Fladrif on several articles related to abuse and bullying, which also includes this template, to the point where he was unable to do any significant edits or participate in any discussions with him, as Penbat felt that he would be jumped on by Fladrif. Fladrif also seemed to align himself with the work of the banned user Star767. Fladrif was indefinitely blocked by Ched for personal attacks and chronic disruption (including the issues with Penbat and Fladrif) as indicated in that ANI thread. As far as I know, bans apply to all edits good or bad. In any case though, since 1338: 869:. For what it's worth, these points, and your or my subjective reactions to the book in general, are not suitable matter for the Knowledge (XXG) article about the book. If we write about what certain facts "look like" to you, or to me, then we're not writing an encyclopedia. That Hubbard's devoted followers wrote a 16 volume biography with many positive statements about him is not at all surprising, nor is it in any way a significant fact about the independently-written Bare-Faced Messiah. Many of your points seem to be 3277: 1441: 31: 2258:), and attempting to berate contributors who know more about the subject than she does (which drove some editors off, and she had issues with Penbat as well to this day due to her actions), and that "there is no evidence that Zeraeph has any relevant academic qualifications in the areas of Knowledge (XXG) that she administers." Also, not every single edit from Zeraeph/Farrajak/Star767 was disruptive in my view, but most of it was (see 2701: 2232:

undoing vandalism, can be allowed to stand), but the presumption in ambiguous cases should be to revert." As such, anyone is free to revert Zeraeph/Farrajak/Star767's edits if they are not constructive. Penbat admitted that "its virtually impossible to forensically dissect the good stuff from the bad stuff" when he reverted her edits. Even if some of this individual's concerns on the narcissism appear to be valid, such as in

2740: 2009: 131: 494: 1684: 1973: 2047: 3014: 2154:

for removing the section on reducing the UAE was because I felt it was underdeveloped and wanted to build upon the section. Looking back it seemed a bit rash to cut out a section of the page without first having prepared any edits. I welcome it back to the page, and sorry for removing it. I'll go over the page again to include more citations and footnotes. Thanks for the feedback!

1882: 211: 381: 3006: 549: 2345: 3183: 1418:. Just add your response below each question and feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Multiple editors will have an opportunity to respond to the interview questions, so be sure to sign your answers. If you know anyone else who would like to participate in the interview, please share this with them. Have a great day. 2203:." And according to him, he is still around, but " have the stomach to work on complex or contentious work." For those reasons, he was not willing to participate in any of the template discussions for the reasons given by him, even the Narcissism one, but he did participate in the Bullying template discussion and expressed his concerns about it. 833: 1596: 846:

based on 2000 year old gnostic beliefs. Scientology is very well grounded as a religion which is why most scholars of New Religions recognise us as acknowledged even by our enemies. And while the UK has not recognised us this is in part because of the Church of England, a state religion and using that to compare what is religious.

1903: 2465:. I noticed that you rcently made a lot of changes to recently relating to citations and referencing. As a question, were there any other things that you noticed in that article that needed changing or, if not, are there any related articles that you know of that might need editing? I eagerly await your reply. -- 834:

http://books.google.com.au/books?id=GnXy0TPigw4C&pg=PA408&lpg=PA408&dq=mozart+unpaid+tailors+bills&source=bl&ots=1rrufveT-J&sig=n_wtyF_kkGEV--h7u-Docz3UUJY&hl=en&sa=X&ei=nefCUcPaEMTQiAfbqIGwBA&ved=0CCwQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=mozart%20unpaid%20tailors%20bills&f=false

2299:

interested, though that is unfair to others who joined in such as Technical 13 who were robust in joining the arguments. The RfC got nowhere. I found I was wondering whether this was because bullying is endemic in the human psyche and "we" do not wish to have it categorised lest we are categorised ourselves.

3250:

Hi Martin, thanks for addressing the question (and for the very informative article). I agree that there seem to be different levels of reading Knowledge (XXG) articles. I myself wouldn't pay as close an attention unless I'm translating (then I can't sweep things under the rug) or I really need the

1151:

would like to retain some sort of control over this stuff but the reality is that it's rather ancient and AFAIK copyright has expired in many cases. This historical information could be used by those without subscriptions to build articles, which could then be improved by current researchers/industry

770:

Hi Martin, I wonder if you can help me? We are I suppose on opposite sides, I'm a Scientologist since 1974 and worked in PR to boot. However I have read Bare Faced Messiah and want to make some improvements to the Knowledge (XXG) page. I believe that you liked this book. I think I have been given

428:

I am also very new at this. I think the APS Knowledge (XXG) Initiative is great idea, and started my History of Psych class on it last semester without having contributed to Knowledge (XXG) ever myself. It was a bumpy ride but I'm doing it again. Thanks for your offer of help. I'm sure I'll be taking

2993:

I have seen you have been involved in the edits to the page regarding the Uncertainty reduction theory and would like your advice with including conceptual models to work with the text to give users a better understanding on the theory. I have done two different diagrams to show different aspects of

2884:

The student profile special page (Special:Student/Username, not to be confused with Special:Students) is a page that lists the courses a student editor is enrolled in, and is also supposed to list the articles that user is working on. However, the list of articles can include incorrect data in cases

2858:

has been continuing, and it's almost at the point that it will be useful to users running edit-a-thons and other non-course outreach events. (If you are planning such an event soon and would like to beta test it for tracking the contributions of newcomers, get it touch.) In the meantime, we've made

2153:

Hello, Golanubi here. I hope this is the proper way to respond to your post on my talk page. That is posting on your talk page. On a broad level. I appreciate any changes to help improve the page. This was my first time in the Wiki-rodeo, so I apologize if everything wasn't up to par. My only reason

1188:

Thanks for the update. The information that commercial publishers have been granted rights to digital scans they make does complicate things a little. However, if the copyright of the original printed content has expired then the old journals are in the public domain and simple faithful photographic

1173:

Just had a really interesting meeting about this. I would have thought that at least some of this content would have copyright expired, but that's not the case. This content is licensed from commercial publishers who have scanned and catalogued it, and have rights to the digital scans in perpetuity.

849:

8. Much emphasis was made on money, yet when Hubbard left the ship on one occasion he ate fish fingers and watched TV all day. There's no real evidence in the book of abuse of funds. And at the end of the book it acknowledges that the majority of his money went to the Church. It may be with good

734:

from 1.00 pm. If you have never been to one, this is an opportunity to meet other Wikipedians in an informal atmosphere for Wiki and non-Wiki related chat and for beer or food if you like. Experienced and new contributors are all welcome. This event is definitely not restricted just to discussion of

3158:

Hi LiAnna. Sorry I missed you at the education weekend- I heard great things about it from those who went. I will definitely be at Wikimania and the pre-conference workshop, but at the moment I'm overloaded with things to do, and it's a queue that's ever growing, so apologies for slow replies. Help

2328:

because there is a chapter about them in a book I picked up & it happens that most of their activity was in Somerset. I'm used to writing about architecture etc but less familiar with "cults", "sects" or whatever the appropriate term is. Can you point me to any similar type articles which could

831:

4. The book overlooks Hubbard's tremendous output of lectures and books, around 100,000 pages and more, which many people have found tremendously valuable. Instead it just gives the embittered person's manufactured resentments at a time he was making tremendous production (bit like a biography of

1854:

I'd think the next step for an article about a photographer and illustrator would be some examples of her work. In the normal course of events, the copyright will have elapsed by now (death of the author plus seventy years) so they can be shared through Wikimedia Commons and from there embedded in

1765:

Hello You helped me upload the page on Cecilia Glaisher this afternoon in Oxford at the women in science day editathon The page has been tagged and as i am very new to wiki i am not sure how to go about putting the links in the way he suggests - please could you email me some advice? Thank you -

928:

Hi and thanks for giving some context that I was unaware of. What's sparked my worry is that Penbat 1) has reverted edits that were definitely improvements, 2) has reverted myself and other editors in good standing with edit summaries that state banned users are being reverted. Since there is more

845:

7. Miller is clearly biased and caricatures Hubbard viciously. He shows no understanding of our religion, and only seeks to make light of it. The material I am reading currently is from 1953 and I looked up what he was talking about, it was drawn from Neoplatonism. Other material from 1952 was

3194:

their hypothesis, then they are looking to falsify their theory - isn't this a negative test? Secondly, this Venn diagram seems to be the depiction of the original Wason's test, in which Clayman & Ha are saying (implying?) that it would be more fruitful to use a negative test to falsify the

2902:

Bugs in the course page creation process (now fixed) led in some cases to duplicate listings for the same course at Special:Courses. This happens when the same course page had two (or more) different course ID numbers. It is possible to clean up such duplicate entries using by making calls to the

2298:

My thoughts on the Bullying template are to let it take its chances (did we ever not?) and change gradually or suddenly as consensus at that time moves it. The arguments have become a waste of my life! At any time that I attempted rational argument I found no-one, except, ironically, Fladrif, was

2198:

was ever intended on my part), here's what Penbat said about this: "I'm quite pissed off that quite a lot of stuff has been removed from the template and ideally i would want it returned to its original state (before Fladriff got involved) and certainly no more taken out. It only got raised as an

1115:

Hi Trev and thanks for the interesting query. I will take it up with relevant people, though I can't promise instant results. It's great to have a specific example to argue from. Where you could help me further is by giving specific examples of things you would do if you had access to papers like

3189:

I am translating the confirmation bias article into Thai, and have a question about the Venn diagram. The middle label "Positive test:Decisive Falsification" confuses me. It seems to me that "Negative test:Decisive Falsification" would make more sense because of two reasons. Firstly, since the

2231:

policy: "Anyone is free to revert any edits made in violation of a ban, without giving any further reason and without regard to the three-revert rule. This does not mean that edits must be reverted just because they were made by a banned editor (obviously helpful changes, such as fixing typos or

1850:

Hello Caroline. I've done some tidying up and we've each made a link from another article (I've linked from the article about the surname Glaisher). Almost all the tags are gone, but the article could do with more inline references: ideally, there should be an inline reference at the end of each

337:

I think you can move that page yourself. You may wish to search the title and red link it in the other articles first. After you move it I think it is more difficult to search because it lands you on the new article by that name. After you move it the red links will turn blue. If you are worried

1639:

The edit was made at the behest of several colleagues, and essentially stated their comment on how the cited article relates to the field. What is an appropriate way to add such an edit -- explain that they can do so but it is out of bound for me to do so, since it looks like self-promotion?

2867:

The default end date for courses is now approximately six months in the future, instead of immediately. This will prevent the common problem where a user creates a new course page but does change the default dates, resulting in a course that is immediately considered "ended" and thus cannot be

2270:

are intended, as I hold a strict policy advising against them. My goals in this matter with the whole template dispute were to help gain a broader consensus on some issues and help Penbat get involved, as I found that some of the consensus were limited and Penbat's edits were valid, as he is a

792:

It's okay not to know all the details of how Knowledge (XXG) articles are developed, but you have to be prepared to learn from the relevant policies or from other users. I can tell you more about your why some of your edits have had a bad reception, if you're interested. About this article in

2893:

A nearly complete patch from Facebook Open Academy student Jeff Lloyd will add a new type of Notification: students will be alerted to edits made by others to the article(s) they are assigned (as well as the corresponding talk pages). Expect to see this feature within the next several weeks.

1268:

Thanks- this is really useful. I will have to look through these links because I'm not very aware of these past discussions. I think if there were a way under UK law to get this material as public domain, they would have already used it rather than subscribing, but we'll see. Cheers,

1934: 1891: 2488:

I've made some comments on the Talk page of that article. My edits are just aimed to bring things into Knowledge (XXG) house style: you are the content experts, so any content suggestions I'll make on the Talk pages. I haven't any suggestions for other articles at the moment.

1635:

Thank you for correcting my error in adding a paragraph to the Behavioral Economics article referring to my own work. I had not realized it was violating the rules, but on reading the definition of appearance of conflict of interest can see how it might well appear that way.

1885: 1152:

experts who have ready access to (and direct knowledge of) more recent developments. Article creation from scratch is currently more time consuming (and surely more daunting for new editors) than the improvement of existing articles. Doing a bit of a search on here I found

1919: 1889: 1888: 1884: 1883: 3354:

Hi Martin, I was updating the bio page for Danny O'Connor when I noticed the Bray Wanderers Current Squad at the foot was out of date. I went to that page and updated it, but the changes don't seem to carry over to the O'Connor page. Is there something I've overlooked?

1890: 2885:

where an instructor or volunteer assigned the articles to the student editor. These profiles are being removed from the extension altogether. This change should go into effect Thursday, May 1. (Logs are still available to find out which courses a user is enrolled in.)

3220:

Firstly, thank you for translating the article. You are absolutely right about the diagram. I, several reviewers and countless readers have all missed this error and you're the first to point it out. When I get around to it, I will replace the SVG file. Thanks again,

1929: 937:

as a dedicated Wikipedian who does a lot of work improving articles in an area which has few good contributors, so I hope they can be persuaded to take on board the opinions of the (now quite a few) editors who have pointed out issues with these templates. Cheers,

813:

1. He seemed to get all the interesting FoI material that I recall was so hard to get, looks like a set up and the Church claims Hubbard's military record was doctored to remove his intelligence roles. We had a witness Fletcher Prouty. Heres a reference on that

1930: 1914: 1936: 1931: 1915: 1912: 694:

The Wikimedia UK AGM will be held in June, and nominations for the UK Wikimedian of the Year are currently open. If there is someone who you feel has made an important contribution to the UK Wikimedia movement in the last year please go ahead and nominate them

1939: 1937: 1925: 1923: 1602:

I had no idea. I had been very busy, but I had just started editing a couple of articles again and to finish the day, I read the village pump, the signpost. Oh interesting, “Psychology on Knowledge (XXG)”… and I was totally unsuspecting of what I was about to

1935: 1927: 1921: 1920: 1918: 1917: 1913: 1938: 1933: 1932: 1924: 1928: 1922: 1916: 1926: 1940: 1887: 827:

3. It lacked critical evaluation of the material. By definition the testimonies are from disaffected people as no Scientologist in good standing would have cooperated. In one passage two conflicting versions of events are given by different people.

3235:

Looking again, the error was not there when the file was reviewed, and was only recently introduced when another user tidied up the file. My faith in the close reading of Knowledge (XXG) reviewers is restored! ;) I've uploaded a corrected version.

2640: 2222:

agree that you are not a sockpuppet of Zeraeph, as you and that user are two different people but I still have doubts about Farrajak's edits and concerns on the Narcissism template, given her disruptive edits on psychology articles in general per

929:

than one template where there is a problem, I think there needs to be some sort of table of the templates, issues with them, and any issues with Penbat's behaviour where those templates are criticised. Possibly the best place is as a subpage of

2997:

I have done a version of the conceptual model by Heath & Bryant (1999) which displays the process of communication (entry, personal, exit). The other table shows the types of strategies implemented within the theory for communication.

1120:

article for one thing, but any other articles? Any other specific old journals you'd like to get your hands on? What on Knowledge (XXG) is lacking that these journals could help improve? Any further examples are grist to my mill. Cheers,

1906: 1910: 1909: 1905: 1904: 1911: 562: 455: 2956:, which is at a high standard, already existed. There is no point in doing this assignment just for the sake of it. This is more your area of expertise than mine and I see that you have previously communicated with this group. See 1297:

Just a quick note of thanks for your ongoing help with our series of Psyc3330 entries over the last few years. We're learning and improving as we go (albeit slowly) and appreciate your guidance and recognition of our efforts.

2427: 841:

6. Miller throws in the odd invented insult. He mentions for instance that LRH said he was Cecil Rhodes in a former life, and then that Rhodes was homosexual. Checking this I found no evidence beyond Rhodes never married.

991: 1414: 3138:

Hi Martin! Johnbod suggested I reach out to you for feedback on a handout I'm working on for student editors in the US/Canada program who are working on psychology articles. My draft is here, and I'd love any feedback:

2265:

Please note that I have been busy with other issues as well (and took a two-month semi-retirement from Knowledge (XXG) from August to October), so I apologize if I did not have time to respond to some of your comments.

2592:

Thanks for all your help Martin, there is one thing you can help me with - on the BSRA wiki you've helped with it now links me (James Brown) to the dead soul/R&B singer. Can we get this removed please? Many Thanks

1365:

Martin Thank you for reviewing my first article (Winifred Brenchley). It was an orphan but now I have linked it from Rothamsted Research. However it is still showing as an orphan. How do I get rid of this message?

1908: 1199: 2929: 1858:

Hello Martin Most of the images I have seen belong to Institutions and are not freely available. I'll have a look to see if I can find others that do not have copyright restrictions, and let you know. Caroline

1080:

Hi and congratulations on the new role! What do you think are the chances of archived JISC journals being freely released (for those which are out of copyright)? Specifically (for the moment) I'm interested in

1204: 3307: 1467: 1093:). Someone with the relevant access could presumably download all such articles and release them as public domain because they're so old, but that could be rather a hassle and we all know the tragic story of 658:

I am trying to duplicate this economic report for all 196 countries. Would you be willing to contribute by duplicating this model for another country on your sandbox and post it to the project proposal page?

3001:

Can any of these be used to aid the article? I'm also looking at copyright protocols for the Heath & Bryant (1999) image as I wouldn't want that to affect this. Any advice would be highly appreciated!

1209: 148: 1815:

Hello Thank you for the tidying up and link adding you have been doing. I am still finding my way around but hope the page now might meet wiki criteria and become un-tagged? all the best - Caroline

1219: 1229: 898: 1239: 1721: 2023:

Thank you for all of the effort you put into the Ada Lovelace events in October 2013. This is an award for coordinating the events in UK and for inspiring people to join the edit-a-thons --

961:

congratulations on the new role, and thanks for joining WikiProject Open Access. I certainly see how the two might go well together, and some ideas around such interaction are collected in

2199:

issue when Fladriff & sock-puppet Star767 piled in. Anyway these days i have WikiBurnout and am trying to do as little as possible on Wiki. I don't have the stomach to get involved in

1234: 1886: 735:

Bristol topics. Bring your laptop if you like and use the free Wifi or just bring yourself. Even better, bring a friend! Click the link for full details. Looking forward to seeing you.

1244: 1224: 297: 2275:, after all). I sure hope my comments clear up some misunderstandings about these issues, as I felt there was concerns that were needed to be raised. For future RFCs, I think reading 1494:

Hi, I'm the Open Access Community Liaison for Wikimania 2014. I think you already know that one track of the conference is going to be open access, so I just thought I'd mention the

2259: 962: 293: 1412:

article. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so,

1060:

I haven't made your edits: you have. If you want to convince people that you don't need to be blocked, it's better to talk about your own behaviour rather than someone else's.

2324:

Hi Martin, I suspect you might be a bit busy with your JISC role, but do you still do more general editing? If so can you give some advice. I've started doing some editing on

2214:, and he already asked me to revert some of Zeraeph's latest sockpuppet Farrajak's edits before you reversed some of them to Farrajak's version and it got raised as an issue ( 2190:

about some issues with the templates relating to psychology, like Bullying and Narcissism. When I informed him about the recent RFC on bullying months later (I consulted with

1343:

As a virtual participant at the NIMR 2013 editathon, here is some virtual cake, as you missed out on the real cake on the day (with Rosalind Franklin's photograph 51 on top).

1189:

reproductions can't have new copyright applied AIUI (unless there has been significant restoration work, etc.) I think it would be helpful to place a clarification request at

2430:. This aspect often trips-up newcomers to academics' AfD. In general, AfDs furnish a valuable mechanism to "test" articles, which helps prevent WP becoming overwhelmed with 2423: 2569:

Sorry for being a bit late to say this, but on behalf of the group I was working with and my own, thank you very much for your suggestions and input on the changes to the

2753: 2462: 2103:

I noticed that you are a fellow researcher in the field of Psychology. While this might not necessarily fit your interests, I recently put significant edits into the

1851:

paragraph, saying which source(s) that paragraph is based on. The article now is most of the way there. Cheers, MartinPoulter Jisc (talk) 13:44, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

838:

5. The stolen diaries etc have been edited to sensational reasons leaving out many positive things to be found in the Church's recently released 16 volume biography.

2674:

Thanks for all the help in me and my group's wikipedia project on social penetration theory. This star is a token of my thanks, and good luck in your future works :)

1907: 1855:

Knowledge (XXG). Do you have ideas for how we get get some of Glaisher's work, or pictures of her, in digital form? MartinPoulter (talk) 13:19, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

1193:, where those more knowledgeable than me may be able to help. I'm happy to do this (and would point you there) unless you fancy initiating such a discussion yourself. 1156:, which seems to have similar goals to this suggestion regarding journals. If I have any other ideas about how content could be used, I'll post back here. Cheers. 390: 1537: 1518: 357:

Thank you for the welcome and the info on citations. I am very new to this and completing edits as part of my masters course in Psychology - Group Dynamics.

307: 786:

I think you are getting accused of "disruptive editing" because in your contributions you seem to think that Knowledge (XXG)'s policies don't apply to you,

3287: 1451: 553: 465: 528:

Well Dr.Poulter, thx for the cookies, I would like to know if there's anyway of requesting help from other wikipedians to work on a certain topics. --

3140: 2107:

and nominated it for Good Article review. If you're interested and have the time, it would be great to get this reviewed by an experienced editor!

930: 240:

I have made some spelling correction to a page. But changes made by me are not visible any more. Please suggest why it is so or where I was wrong.

2615:

Since you don't seem to have a Knowledge (XXG) biography, I've removed the link from that text by deleting the brackets around the name. Cheers,

1153: 2756:. Many of them can clearly see that their experience with learning how to edit Knowledge (XXG) has been greatly enhanced through your input. -- 2288: 918: 696: 688: 303: 2378:, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please 218: 199: 2904: 1386:

Hi Martin! Thanks for your support. It's very exciting to become a contributor and I'm glad you're around to help out. Have a great day!

3104: 994:

article. I have substantially changed it, and I wonder if you could take another look and see if it is more acceptable now. Thanks. —

3143:. Any chance you have some time to review it in the next week? On an unrelated note, I hope to see you at Wikimania again this year! -- 506:

Substantial contributions and a methodically sound manner in working on or discussing the details of a subject or issue. Thanks a lot!

110: 2353: 394: 2839: 285: 81: 76: 71: 59: 1833:

Thank you again for all the help i got in getting this page corrected. And thank you for rmoving the box all the best, Caroline

1663: 2089: 2028: 1579: 1190: 933:. Then we can get hopefully a wider community of editors to look at the whole problem rather than individual templates. I know 704: 1789: 300:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 2957: 2543: 2224: 2170: 2104: 1740:

if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the

1148: 165: 3009:

A table designed to show the different strategies implemented through the uncertainty reduction theory for human interaction

2365: 1783: 1521:

related to your proposed project. I look forward to hearing more on your thoughts. You found a great way to promote WS! -

1317: 1690: 262:

Just wanted to say thank you for helping to improve the CCPA article. I shall endeavour to learn from your improvements!

2573:

article. It has been extremely helpful to us all. Hope all's well and good luck in whatever endeavors you have ahead. --

2570: 2458: 1015:

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Arbitration_enforcement_action_appeal_by_drg55

2919: 2279:

should be valuable. I've asked Penbat and Timtrent on what their thoughts are about this matter as well. Best wishes,

1032: 1136: 3286:

Thank you, user with scientific background promoting critical and scientific thinking: for quality articles such as

1450:

Thank you, user with scientific background promoting critical and scientific thinking: for quality articles such as

3148: 3082: 3017:

A conceptual model re-designed to aid the uncertainty reduction theory's process of thought (entry, personal, exit)

2965: 2085: 2024: 1741: 1727: 700: 284:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

248: 38: 3159:

for psychology students is a topic I'm very interested in, but I need to get other things out of the way. Cheers,

2195: 2949: 2945: 2938: 2516: 2065: 1864: 1838: 1820: 1793: 1771: 975: 726: 638: 2827: 2815: 2713:

This barn star is to thankyou for the help you gave me and my group on the Expectancy violation Theory Article

2150: 1750: 2818:

for wikimania 2014. Please feel free to give your suggestions, if any. --arunbandana 16:44, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

2682: 2659: 2525: 2233: 1714: 1702: 1337: 1014: 270: 2399:

For anyone wondering, this was me withdrawing my own nomination when consensus had already developed to keep.

1139:, both text and also including a free image of Gall's original map. Content may be useful elsewhere too, e.g. 3039:

Praise to you for "I believe this work deserves praise as advancing free knowledge in its truest sense" ;) --

2915: 2236:, part of Zeraeph/Farrajak/Star767's modus operandi are ripping out cited text from psychology articles (see 2032: 560:

has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath

214: 203: 3339: 3241: 3226: 3164: 3123: 3100: 3063: 2799: 2620: 2551: 2494: 2404: 1274: 1179: 1126: 1065: 943: 878: 866: 824:

Scientology continues to be against the abuse of psychiatric drugs which is worth billions internationally.

798: 434: 47: 17: 2158: 1651: 1567: 1560:

I have improved my citations and referencing for this article. Can the message at the top be removed now?

1305: 1090: 1020: 387:

I thought that you deserved something a bit extra for all of the amazing work you've done for the project.

244: 98: 3318: 3044: 2961: 2910:

If you have feedback about these changes, or other questions or ideas related to course pages, please let

2200: 1954: 1860: 1834: 1816: 1767: 1683: 1478: 906: 663: 634: 106: 2361: 3144: 3025: 2953: 2835: 2794:. Pleasure working with you on these interesting articles. Just wish I'd had the time to interact more. 2186:

Hi, MartinPoulter. I think you do really good work around Knowledge (XXG). A few months ago, you pinged

1695: 999: 755: 740: 678: 533: 2911: 2426:, it's similar to law: the thresholds are not statutory, but are rather enshrined in the precedents of 1737: 102: 2439: 2388: 2379: 1659: 1655: 1545: 1526: 967: 870: 2610: 2594: 1144: 2791: 2783: 2678: 2655: 2598: 2537: 2521: 2162: 2135:'s programs, we'd like to hear your thoughts about future donations and project activities in this 2055:

It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can

1615: 1575: 1503: 1371: 615: 407: 343: 266: 185: 181: 94:

I am having trouble editing the critical thinking page. It won't except my changes. Can you help

1309: 3364: 3335: 3252: 3237: 3222: 3215: 3199: 3160: 3119: 3115: 3091: 3059: 2795: 2761: 2718: 2616: 2578: 2547: 2490: 2470: 2400: 2308: 2284: 2166: 2116: 1423: 1387: 1270: 1175: 1122: 1061: 939: 914: 874: 794: 619: 430: 189: 163: 152: 3276: 1440: 1086: 3360: 3331: 3314: 3055: 3040: 2876:

Whenever a user gets added to a course by someone else, they will now receive a Notification.

2237: 1950: 1718:

bred 6,983 guinea pigs for her study of whether daily doses of alcohol had hereditary effects?

1474: 1348: 1313: 894: 557: 323: 2416: 2136: 3256: 3203: 3021: 2973: 2831: 2357: 2212:

long history with that user, who has driven off Wikipedians from editing psychology articles

1391: 995: 751: 736: 674: 529: 362: 2369: 2276: 2272: 2267: 2228: 2194:

about opening that particular RFC as I felt that the April discussion went nowhere, but no

2132: 1605:

Thank you so much for your kind words! I am still quite shocked and very happy. Thank you!

902: 511: 3343: 3322: 3260: 3245: 3230: 3207: 3168: 3152: 3127: 3108: 3067: 3048: 3029: 2977: 2923: 2855: 2843: 2803: 2765: 2722: 2686: 2663: 2624: 2602: 2582: 2555: 2529: 2498: 2474: 2443: 2435: 2408: 2393: 2383: 2333: 2313: 2292: 2174: 2145: 2121: 2093: 1991: 1958: 1868: 1842: 1824: 1808: 1804: 1775: 1731: 1667: 1622: 1583: 1549: 1541: 1530: 1522: 1507: 1482: 1427: 1395: 1375: 1352: 1321: 1278: 1263: 1259: 1183: 1168: 1164: 1130: 1109: 1105: 1069: 1054: 1050: 1028: 1003: 980: 947: 922: 882: 859: 855: 802: 780: 776: 759: 744: 721: 714: 708: 682: 642: 623: 598: 593: 579: 574: 537: 515: 479: 474: 438: 414: 366: 347: 327: 274: 252: 232: 193: 167: 114: 2930:

Subscribe or unsubscribe from future Knowledge (XXG) Education Program technical updates.

2700: 2739: 1606: 1571: 1499: 1498:

on the project wiki. Feel free to add your name to the list of interested Wikimedians!

1367: 398: 339: 338:

about a COI move then leave a note on my talk page or here and I can move it for you.--

225: 2754:

Psychology of Internet Behaviour module at the University of Hull's Scarborough Campus

1495: 2787: 2779: 2775: 2757: 2714: 2574: 2483: 2466: 2303: 2280: 2191: 2112: 1419: 1087:

Use of cylindrical projections for geographical astronomical, and scientific purposes

910: 314:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

158: 2944:

There is a new student assignment issue, a student is intending to work on a stub -

566:

and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!

493: 3356: 2349: 2325: 2075: 1344: 1094: 319: 315: 2008: 1972: 850:

reason from past experience that he didn't trust people to safeguard our reserves.

130: 3198:

I (and maybe some Thai) would appreciate your shedding some light about this. --

1944: 1895: 1724:. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page 789:

and you've been unduly hostile, e.g. accusing other editors of a "childish game".

217:

has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at

3290:, for planning an article on a study of Parents and Children, for serving as an 2969: 2515:

I am currently working on a page as a part of my University course, the page is

2512:

Thank you for your introduction (and cookies) to welcome me to Knowledge (XXG).

2187: 2142: 1454:, for planning an article on a study of Parents and Children, for serving as an 934: 358: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

3013: 507: 2639: 1987:

For contributions to and organisation of various Wikimedia events in the UK —

1799: 1254: 1159: 1140: 1117: 1100: 1082: 1046: 1024: 851: 821: 820:

2. The fact that the media backed the book looks like black propaganda ref

772: 669: 588: 569: 548: 470: 2461:

page on Knowledge (XXG) as part of a class project at the University of Hull

815: 3291: 3005: 2330: 2262:, in which Penbat took part and compared Star767's and Farrajak's actions). 1988: 1455: 2859:

a few small improvements and bug fixes to the Education Program extension:

1408:

The WikiProject Report would like to focus on WikiProject Psychology for a

1216:

There have also been previous discussions of some relevance here on en-wp:

992:

Knowledge (XXG) talk:Articles for creation/High-Probabilty Request Sequence

986:

Knowledge (XXG) talk:Articles for creation/High-Probabilty Request Sequence

2752:

Thank you so very much for the many interactions with our students on the

905:, do you think we should start a new discussion about this matter over on 380: 1710: 3182: 3058:. I hope my nomination is successful and I think I've made a good case. 2830:

that I have submitted for Wikimania 2014 and give your valuable inputs.

2344: 1196:

Previous discussions of some relevance (on Commons) which I found are:

289: 3088:

to put your ORCID (and other) identifiers on your Wikidata user page.

2814:

Hi MartinPoulter, I would request you to have a look at my submission

2206:

Also, to add some background information, Zeraeph has been banned per

1595: 971: 1754: 990:

Dear MartinPoulter: Thank you for taking the time to comment on the

865:

Why are you discussing this here? Please have this discussion in the

664:

http://en.wikipedia.org/User:Mcnabber091/Economy_of_the_United_States

2368:

at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a

1220:

How can a journal publisher grant permission to use images en masse?

2948:. However I don't think anybody realized (including the creator of 832:

Mozart with no music and just whining about unpaid tailor's bills.

3181: 3012: 3004: 2544:

Talk:Social_penetration_theory#Improvements_needed_to_this_article

2431: 1901: 1880: 653: 151:! I'm presenting you with the Ada Lovelace Award for starting the 3114:

The ORCID revolution goes on and on! Thanks for the notification

2210:(and no, that problem did not start with me). Penbat does have a 1097:. Any thoughts/insights? Am I missing something obvious? Cheers. 2052:

Hello, MartinPoulter. Please check your email; you've got mail!

1045:

I've made another mention of you in a clarification for Yogesh.

1678: 1147:

could be useful from a historical perspective. Presumably the

1143:, as you state. Off the top of my head, old documents such as 25: 807:

OK, from my point of view the book was quite interesting, but

2302:

I'm not really sure where one goes from here on this topic.

2045: 1707:, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was 1594: 543:

DYK nomination of Heuristics in judgment and decision making

1230:

Use of Photos / Diagrams From Canadian Medical Journal 1946

1145:

Minutes of the Proceedings (Institution of Civil Engineers)

873:. But again, here is not the place to have the discussion. 2905:

documented this process and written a Python script for it

2457:

Myself and 3 fellow students are working on improving the

1722:

Template:Did you know nominations/Florence Margaret Durham

1945:

This is an open letter for free access to Knowledge (XXG)

1896:

This is an open letter for free access to Knowledge (XXG)

219:

the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page

1513:

Comments on "Creating a brochure for English Wikisource"

1235:

Image published in a 1957 medical journal - UK copyright

3302: 3296: 2434:. I hope you will participate more over there. Thanks, 2374: 2256: 2253: 2250: 2247: 2244: 2241: 2215: 2211: 2207: 2057: 1463: 1459: 790: 787: 460: 450: 288:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 3134:

Help reviewing psychology handout for student editors?

2238:

User_talk:Star767#Problems_with_your_work_on_Wikipedia

2234:

this Narcissism template reduction matter back in June

1200:

Aren't journal articles under copyright of some form?

184:

for encouraging me to take my first tentative steps!

2352:

from articles, or remove other people's comments in

1720:

The nomination discussion and review may be seen at

1536:

I posted a few samples of Wikisource Frontpieces at

652:

Would you be interested to help me on this project?

2889:

Article edit notifications for students coming soon

2364:. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please 2240:), having a strong dislike of over categorization ( 1540:. Let me know when your draft is ready! Cheers -- 2218:does not seem to be valid to me nor Penbat, but I 155:article. Your contributions are quite appreciated. 2348:Welcome to Knowledge (XXG). Please do not remove 1205:Author uploads of Nature Publishing Group figures 699:by 09:00 (BST) on Monday 20th May at the latest. 159: 670:http://en.wikipedia.org/User:Mcnabber091/sandbox 2246:) completely downplaying the narcissism topic ( 2849:Education Program technical update, April 2014 654:https://meta.wikimedia.org/Global_Economic_Map 280:Disambiguation link notification for January 6 8: 2872:Notifications when you get added to a course 893:Hi, Martin. Regarding the recent changes at 2360:. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create 1240:Line drawing from pre 1970s science journal 1210:Using images in scientific journal articles 793:particular, I will reply on the Talk page. 612:why do some acadmics shun Knowledge (XXG). 3288:Heuristics in judgment and decision making 2854:Since the last update, development of the 1538:Creating a brochure for English Wikisource 1519:Creating a brochure for English Wikisource 1452:Heuristics in judgment and decision making 822:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_SAUborWbPw 816:http://scientologymyths.com/hubbardww2.htm 689:UK Wikimedian of the Year 2013/Nominations 554:Heuristics in judgment and decision making 3334:- your appreciation is much appreciated. 2826:This is to request you to have a look at 2637: 2006: 1970: 1699:was updated with a fact from the article 1135:A specific example would be additions to 128: 3141:User:LiAnna (Wiki Ed)/Psychology handout 1415:here are the questions for the interview 750:Could you add your name Martin? Thanks. 730:, 43-45 Corn Street, Bristol BS1 1HT on 585:Proposal to withdraw this nomination -- 375: 1191:commons:Commons:Village pump/Copyright 464:. If you would like help on modifying 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 2880:Disabling individual student profiles 2111: 1013:Hi Martin I have mentioned you here 931:Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Psychology 7: 3054:I really appreciate your kind words 2707:The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar 2654:Thanks for your help in my project. 2182:About Penbat and the template issues 2056: 3350:Bray Wanderers & Danny O'Connor 3175:Question about File:Klayman Ha1.svg 1009:Mention in appeal on block of drg55 147:Thank you for participating in the 2937:New student assignment issue with 2898:Duplicate courses and API deletion 2852: 2127:The Knowledge (XXG) Library Survey 1790:posting a question at the Teahouse 395:gift from the Wikimedia Foundation 24: 1225:Diagrams from scientific journals 286:Childhood Cancer Parents Alliance 3275: 2738: 2699: 2638: 2343: 2329:help with structure, tone etc?— 2007: 1999: 1971: 1682: 1675:DYK for Florence Margaret Durham 1591:Thank you, thank you, thank you! 1439: 1336: 547: 492: 379: 209: 129: 29: 3292:Expert outreach/Jisc Ambassador 2952:that a closely related article 1456:Expert outreach/Jisc Ambassador 3365:20:05, 16 September 2014 (UTC) 3344:14:40, 13 September 2014 (UTC) 3074:ORCID & Wikidata user page 2958:Talk:Flexibility (personality) 2105:Atkinson-Shiffrin memory model 1757:) 16:05, 5 October 2013 (UTC) 1628:Removal of edit citing my work 1623:17:58, 22 September 2013 (UTC) 1584:16:29, 17 September 2013 (UTC) 1: 3323:12:54, 1 September 2013 (UTC) 2354:Articles for deletion debates 2350:Articles for deletion notices 2314:09:55, 12 December 2013 (UTC) 2293:03:12, 12 December 2013 (UTC) 2227:). I would like to quote the 2122:20:58, 26 November 2013 (UTC) 1898:(burned-in English subtitles) 1550:15:01, 8 September 2013 (UTC) 1508:10:08, 7 September 2013 (UTC) 1483:12:54, 1 September 2013 (UTC) 899:this ANI thread back in April 599:12:35, 22 February 2013 (UTC) 580:12:35, 22 February 2013 (UTC) 558:Did You Know nominations page 538:14:24, 21 February 2013 (UTC) 516:16:30, 18 February 2013 (UTC) 480:23:47, 11 February 2013 (UTC) 253:11:51, 30 December 2012 (UTC) 233:14:49, 26 December 2012 (UTC) 194:00:22, 23 December 2012 (UTC) 176:Thanks for your encouragement 2960:. I have also commented at 2571:Uncertainty Reduction Theory 2459:Uncertainty reduction theory 2450:Uncertainty reduction theory 2334:21:39, 23 January 2014 (UTC) 2175:19:35, 9 December 2013 (UTC) 2146:15:48, 9 December 2013 (UTC) 2094:15:32, 8 November 2013 (UTC) 2061:at any time by removing the 2033:14:22, 4 November 2013 (UTC) 1992:21:14, 3 November 2013 (UTC) 1959:22:18, 31 October 2013 (UTC) 1869:13:08, 21 October 2013 (UTC) 1843:10:10, 18 October 2013 (UTC) 1825:19:25, 17 October 2013 (UTC) 1809:09:52, 16 October 2013 (UTC) 1776:23:37, 15 October 2013 (UTC) 1091:at jiscjournalarchives.ac.uk 439:03:13, 30 January 2013 (UTC) 415:11:14, 29 January 2013 (UTC) 367:23:46, 20 January 2013 (UTC) 348:14:21, 19 January 2013 (UTC) 168:15:31, 21 October 2012 (UTC) 115:14:40, 21 October 2012 (UTC) 3330:Thanks very much for this, 2562:A (somewhat belated) thanks 2133:The Knowledge (XXG) Library 1668:18:13, 2 October 2013 (UTC) 1531:11:46, 28 August 2013 (UTC) 1428:01:13, 27 August 2013 (UTC) 1396:07:49, 15 August 2013 (UTC) 1376:12:00, 13 August 2013 (UTC) 1251:What do you think? Cheers. 1089:(also apparently available 328:11:53, 6 January 2013 (UTC) 275:14:24, 5 January 2013 (UTC) 3380: 3030:12:53, 23 April 2014 (UTC) 2978:08:29, 23 April 2014 (UTC) 2966:User talk:Margaret Cookson 2924:19:23, 22 April 2014 (UTC) 2844:16:56, 18 April 2014 (UTC) 2804:16:40, 26 March 2014 (UTC) 2766:16:03, 26 March 2014 (UTC) 2723:18:45, 25 March 2014 (UTC) 2687:17:26, 25 March 2014 (UTC) 2664:17:26, 25 March 2014 (UTC) 2625:10:53, 25 March 2014 (UTC) 2603:08:49, 25 March 2014 (UTC) 2583:22:20, 24 March 2014 (UTC) 2556:15:13, 22 March 2014 (UTC) 2530:15:24, 20 March 2014 (UTC) 2499:14:21, 19 March 2014 (UTC) 2475:14:04, 19 March 2014 (UTC) 2444:15:34, 10 March 2014 (UTC) 2409:12:43, 10 March 2014 (UTC) 2394:11:24, 10 March 2014 (UTC) 2151:Ultimate Attribution Error 2131:As a subscriber to one of 1245:Images in Journal Articles 1154:GLAM/British Library/Books 683:05:54, 13 April 2013 (UTC) 643:15:35, 10 April 2013 (UTC) 624:15:34, 10 April 2013 (UTC) 552:Hello! Your submission of 385: 180:Just wanted to say thanks 149:Ada Lovelace Day editathon 3283:ambassador of open access 3261:02:34, 29 July 2014 (UTC) 3251:details. Thanks again.-- 3246:11:03, 22 July 2014 (UTC) 3231:10:54, 22 July 2014 (UTC) 3208:06:41, 18 July 2014 (UTC) 3169:10:56, 22 July 2014 (UTC) 3153:04:27, 17 July 2014 (UTC) 3128:14:38, 19 June 2014 (UTC) 3068:14:37, 19 June 2014 (UTC) 3049:22:46, 13 June 2014 (UTC) 2950:flexibility (personality) 2946:flexibility (personality) 2939:flexibility (personality) 2737: 2698: 2644: 2517:Social penetration theory 2208:this arbitration decision 2099:Psychology article review 2013: 1977: 1447:ambassador of open access 1353:09:11, 28 July 2013 (UTC) 1322:13:33, 27 July 2013 (UTC) 1279:12:40, 18 July 2013 (UTC) 1264:10:10, 18 July 2013 (UTC) 1184:15:10, 17 July 2013 (UTC) 981:00:05, 29 June 2013 (UTC) 948:21:56, 26 June 2013 (UTC) 923:18:11, 26 June 2013 (UTC) 883:11:50, 20 June 2013 (UTC) 860:11:34, 20 June 2013 (UTC) 803:13:57, 19 June 2013 (UTC) 781:07:42, 19 June 2013 (UTC) 760:21:34, 26 June 2013 (UTC) 745:10:24, 17 June 2013 (UTC) 724:which will take place at 491: 429:you up on it. Best, Jim 135: 3109:17:11, 27 May 2014 (UTC) 2856:editor campaigns project 2542:I've put my comments at 2225:her contribution history 1736:and it will be added to 1715:Florence Margaret Durham 1703:Florence Margaret Durham 1616: 1607: 1169:14:27, 2 July 2013 (UTC) 1131:09:58, 2 July 2013 (UTC) 1110:09:36, 2 July 2013 (UTC) 1070:14:54, 6 July 2013 (UTC) 1055:21:31, 5 July 2013 (UTC) 1004:08:39, 6 July 2013 (UTC) 907:the template's talk page 867:Talk page of the article 709:12:59, 17 May 2013 (UTC) 408: 399: 372:You have been nominated! 2863:Default course end date 2463:which can be found here 1742:Did you know? talk page 720:You are invited to the 563:your nomination's entry 215:Template:Citation tools 204:Template:Citation tools 200:Nomination for deletion 18:User talk:MartinPoulter 3303:voting for open access 3186: 3018: 3010: 2962:User talk:Greta Munger 2428:hundreds of prior AfDs 2260:this SPI investigation 2201:Template talk:Bullying 2050: 2000:Ada's Angel Award 2013 1981:The Real-Life Barnstar 1947: 1899: 1599: 1464:voting for open access 1137:Gall–Peters projection 444:DYK for Heuristics ... 3185: 3016: 3008: 2954:cognitive flexibility 2422:Per your question at 2339:Removing AfD template 2320:Writing about "sects" 2086:Richard Nevell (WMUK) 2049: 2025:Daria Cybulska (WMUK) 1943: 1894: 1598: 1517:I posted comments at 1490:Wikimania 2014 London 1401:WP Psychology in the 1076:JISC journal archives 701:Richard Nevell (WMUK) 42:of past discussions. 3349: 2746:The Surreal Barnstar 2648:The Special Barnstar 2273:consensus can change 1301:Thank you, Martin! 903:consensus can change 727:The Commercial Rooms 316:opt-out instructions 3297:inviting discussion 3190:subject is testing 2792:User:Archiedale1204 2784:User:Rosiesievers20 2731:A barnstar for you! 2692:A barnstar for you! 2631:Thanks for the help 2268:No personal attacks 2141:Thanks and cheers, 1556:Katherine Warington 1460:inviting discussion 732:Sunday 28 July 2013 722:Bristol Wiki Meetup 715:Bristol Wiki Meetup 485:A barnstar for you! 468:, do let me know -- 298:fix with Dab solver 3308:awesome Wikipedian 3187: 3019: 3011: 2356:, as you did with 2058:remove this notice 2051: 2017:Ada Lovelace Award 1948: 1900: 1874:South Africa Video 1600: 1468:awesome Wikipedian 1329:A cupcake for you! 1116:this. Improve the 766:Bare Faced Messiah 500:The Minor barnstar 306:• Join us at the 153:Frances Hardcastle 139:Ada Lovelace Award 3332:User:Gerda Arendt 3083:Authority control 2986:Conceptual models 2932: 2771: 2770: 2728: 2727: 2669: 2668: 2178: 2161:comment added by 2038: 2037: 1997: 1996: 1941: 1892: 1784:Talk page stalker 1748: 1747: 1735: 1671: 1654:comment added by 1587: 1570:comment added by 1358: 1357: 1325: 1308:comment added by 1037: 1023:comment added by 963:this presentation 895:Template:Bullying 521: 520: 461:presently stalled 421: 420: 311: 173: 172: 118: 101:comment added by 87: 86: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 3371: 3305: 3299: 3279: 3219: 3145:LiAnna (Wiki Ed) 3107: 3098: 3094: 3087: 3081: 3078:You can now use 2928: 2828:the presentation 2742: 2735: 2734: 2703: 2696: 2695: 2642: 2635: 2634: 2614: 2541: 2487: 2386: 2377: 2358:Gary Roy Geffken 2347: 2311: 2306: 2177: 2155: 2120: 2082: 2080: 2074: 2070: 2064: 2060: 2048: 2011: 2004: 2003: 1975: 1968: 1967: 1942: 1893: 1802: 1787: 1761:Cecilia Glaisher 1725: 1686: 1679: 1670: 1648: 1620: 1619: 1613: 1612: 1586: 1564: 1443: 1340: 1333: 1332: 1324: 1302: 1257: 1162: 1103: 1036: 1017: 979: 597: 591: 578: 572: 551: 496: 489: 488: 478: 463: 453: 412: 411: 405: 404: 383: 376: 301: 294:check to confirm 245:Akaanksha Saxena 228: 213: 212: 161: 133: 126: 125: 122:Ada Lovelace Day 117: 95: 68: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 3379: 3378: 3374: 3373: 3372: 3370: 3369: 3368: 3352: 3327: 3326: 3306:, - you are an 3301: 3295: 3280: 3271: 3213: 3177: 3136: 3096: 3090: 3089: 3085: 3079: 3076: 3037: 2988: 2942: 2934: 2916:Sage Ross (WMF) 2851: 2824: 2812: 2733: 2694: 2633: 2608: 2590: 2564: 2535: 2507: 2481: 2452: 2420: 2392: 2384: 2373: 2341: 2322: 2309: 2304: 2184: 2156: 2129: 2101: 2083: 2078: 2072: 2068: 2066:You've got mail 2062: 2054: 2046: 2043: 2002: 1966: 1902: 1881: 1876: 1861:Caroline Marten 1835:Caroline Marten 1817:Caroline Marten 1797: 1781: 1768:Caroline Marten 1763: 1751:The DYK project 1677: 1649: 1630: 1617: 1608: 1593: 1565: 1558: 1515: 1492: 1487: 1486: 1466:, - you are an 1444: 1435: 1406: 1384: 1363: 1331: 1303: 1295: 1252: 1157: 1098: 1078: 1043: 1018: 1011: 988: 968:Daniel Mietchen 966: 956: 954:Jisc Ambassador 897:, if you check 891: 768: 718: 692: 662:United States: 650: 635:Stephen McGlynn 631: 607: 587: 586: 568: 567: 545: 526: 487: 469: 459: 449: 446: 426: 417: 409: 400: 374: 355: 335: 308:DPL WikiProject 282: 260: 226: 210: 207: 178: 124: 96: 92: 64: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 3377: 3375: 3351: 3348: 3347: 3346: 3285: 3274: 3273: 3272: 3270: 3269:Precious again 3267: 3266: 3265: 3264: 3263: 3233: 3195:hypothesis. 3176: 3173: 3172: 3171: 3135: 3132: 3131: 3130: 3075: 3072: 3071: 3070: 3036: 3033: 2987: 2984: 2982: 2941: 2935: 2900: 2899: 2891: 2890: 2882: 2881: 2874: 2873: 2865: 2864: 2850: 2847: 2823: 2820: 2811: 2808: 2807: 2806: 2769: 2768: 2749: 2748: 2743: 2732: 2729: 2726: 2725: 2710: 2709: 2704: 2693: 2690: 2679:Rosiesievers20 2667: 2666: 2656:Rosiesievers20 2651: 2650: 2645: 2643: 2632: 2629: 2628: 2627: 2589: 2586: 2563: 2560: 2559: 2558: 2538:Archiedale1204 2522:Archiedale1204 2506: 2503: 2502: 2501: 2451: 2448: 2419: 2413: 2412: 2411: 2390: 2340: 2337: 2321: 2318: 2317: 2316: 2300: 2196:forum shopping 2183: 2180: 2128: 2125: 2100: 2097: 2053: 2044: 2042: 2039: 2036: 2035: 2020: 2019: 2014: 2012: 2001: 1998: 1995: 1994: 1984: 1983: 1978: 1976: 1965: 1962: 1875: 1872: 1847: 1829: 1814: 1812: 1811: 1794:your talk page 1792:, as noted on 1788:You could try 1762: 1759: 1746: 1745: 1691:5 October 2013 1687: 1676: 1673: 1646: 1629: 1626: 1604: 1592: 1589: 1557: 1554: 1553: 1552: 1514: 1511: 1491: 1488: 1449: 1438: 1437: 1436: 1434: 1431: 1405: 1399: 1383: 1380: 1362: 1359: 1356: 1355: 1341: 1330: 1327: 1294: 1291: 1290: 1289: 1288: 1287: 1286: 1285: 1284: 1283: 1282: 1281: 1249: 1248: 1247: 1242: 1237: 1232: 1227: 1222: 1214: 1213: 1212: 1207: 1202: 1194: 1077: 1074: 1073: 1072: 1042: 1039: 1010: 1007: 987: 984: 955: 952: 951: 950: 890: 887: 886: 885: 811: 810: 809: 808: 767: 764: 763: 762: 717: 712: 691: 686: 649: 646: 630: 627: 609:'hello Martin 606: 603: 602: 601: 544: 541: 525: 522: 519: 518: 503: 502: 497: 486: 483: 456:seems your DYK 445: 442: 425: 422: 419: 418: 388: 386: 384: 373: 370: 354: 351: 334: 331: 281: 278: 267:NatalieBateman 259: 256: 227:Gadget850 (Ed) 206: 197: 177: 174: 171: 170: 156: 146: 142: 141: 136: 134: 123: 120: 91: 88: 85: 84: 79: 74: 69: 62: 52: 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3376: 3367: 3366: 3362: 3358: 3345: 3341: 3337: 3336:MartinPoulter 3333: 3329: 3328: 3325: 3324: 3320: 3316: 3311: 3309: 3304: 3298: 3293: 3289: 3284: 3278: 3268: 3262: 3258: 3254: 3249: 3248: 3247: 3243: 3239: 3238:MartinPoulter 3234: 3232: 3228: 3224: 3223:MartinPoulter 3217: 3212: 3211: 3210: 3209: 3205: 3201: 3196: 3193: 3184: 3180: 3174: 3170: 3166: 3162: 3161:MartinPoulter 3157: 3156: 3155: 3154: 3150: 3146: 3142: 3133: 3129: 3125: 3121: 3120:MartinPoulter 3117: 3113: 3112: 3111: 3110: 3106: 3102: 3097:Pigsonthewing 3093: 3084: 3073: 3069: 3065: 3061: 3060:MartinPoulter 3057: 3053: 3052: 3051: 3050: 3046: 3042: 3034: 3032: 3031: 3027: 3023: 3015: 3007: 3003: 2999: 2995: 2991: 2985: 2983: 2980: 2979: 2975: 2971: 2967: 2963: 2959: 2955: 2951: 2947: 2940: 2936: 2933: 2931: 2926: 2925: 2921: 2917: 2914:or me know!-- 2913: 2908: 2906: 2897: 2896: 2895: 2888: 2887: 2886: 2879: 2878: 2877: 2871: 2870: 2869: 2868:enrolled in. 2862: 2861: 2860: 2857: 2848: 2846: 2845: 2841: 2837: 2833: 2829: 2821: 2819: 2817: 2809: 2805: 2801: 2797: 2796:MartinPoulter 2793: 2789: 2788:User:RStoakes 2785: 2781: 2780:User:Natbrock 2777: 2776:User:ToniSant 2773: 2772: 2767: 2763: 2759: 2755: 2751: 2750: 2747: 2744: 2741: 2736: 2730: 2724: 2720: 2716: 2712: 2711: 2708: 2705: 2702: 2697: 2691: 2689: 2688: 2684: 2680: 2675: 2672: 2665: 2661: 2657: 2653: 2652: 2649: 2646: 2641: 2636: 2630: 2626: 2622: 2618: 2617:MartinPoulter 2612: 2607: 2606: 2605: 2604: 2600: 2596: 2587: 2585: 2584: 2580: 2576: 2572: 2567: 2561: 2557: 2553: 2549: 2548:MartinPoulter 2545: 2539: 2534: 2533: 2532: 2531: 2527: 2523: 2519: 2518: 2513: 2510: 2504: 2500: 2496: 2492: 2491:MartinPoulter 2485: 2479: 2478: 2477: 2476: 2472: 2468: 2464: 2460: 2455: 2449: 2447: 2445: 2441: 2437: 2433: 2429: 2425: 2418: 2414: 2410: 2406: 2402: 2401:MartinPoulter 2398: 2397: 2396: 2395: 2389: 2387: 2381: 2376: 2371: 2367: 2363: 2359: 2355: 2351: 2346: 2338: 2336: 2335: 2332: 2327: 2319: 2315: 2312: 2307: 2301: 2297: 2296: 2295: 2294: 2290: 2289:contributions 2286: 2282: 2281:Lord Sjones23 2278: 2274: 2269: 2263: 2261: 2257: 2254: 2251: 2248: 2245: 2242: 2239: 2235: 2230: 2226: 2221: 2217: 2213: 2209: 2204: 2202: 2197: 2193: 2192:User:Timtrent 2189: 2181: 2179: 2176: 2172: 2168: 2164: 2160: 2152: 2148: 2147: 2144: 2140: 2139: 2138:brief survey. 2134: 2126: 2124: 2123: 2118: 2114: 2108: 2106: 2098: 2096: 2095: 2091: 2087: 2077: 2067: 2059: 2040: 2034: 2030: 2026: 2022: 2021: 2018: 2015: 2010: 2005: 1993: 1990: 1986: 1985: 1982: 1979: 1974: 1969: 1963: 1961: 1960: 1956: 1952: 1951:Victor Grigas 1946: 1897: 1879: 1878:Here you go! 1873: 1871: 1870: 1866: 1862: 1856: 1852: 1848: 1845: 1844: 1840: 1836: 1831: 1830:Good morning 1827: 1826: 1822: 1818: 1810: 1806: 1801: 1795: 1791: 1785: 1780: 1779: 1778: 1777: 1773: 1769: 1760: 1758: 1756: 1752: 1743: 1739: 1733: 1729: 1723: 1719: 1717: 1716: 1712: 1706: 1705: 1704: 1698: 1697: 1696:Did you know? 1692: 1688: 1685: 1681: 1680: 1674: 1672: 1669: 1665: 1661: 1657: 1653: 1644: 1641: 1637: 1633: 1627: 1625: 1624: 1621: 1614: 1611: 1597: 1590: 1588: 1585: 1581: 1577: 1573: 1569: 1561: 1555: 1551: 1547: 1543: 1539: 1535: 1534: 1533: 1532: 1528: 1524: 1520: 1512: 1510: 1509: 1505: 1501: 1497: 1496:page about it 1489: 1485: 1484: 1480: 1476: 1471: 1469: 1465: 1461: 1457: 1453: 1448: 1442: 1432: 1430: 1429: 1425: 1421: 1417: 1416: 1411: 1404: 1400: 1398: 1397: 1393: 1389: 1381: 1379: 1377: 1373: 1369: 1360: 1354: 1350: 1346: 1342: 1339: 1335: 1334: 1328: 1326: 1323: 1319: 1315: 1311: 1307: 1299: 1292: 1280: 1276: 1272: 1271:MartinPoulter 1267: 1266: 1265: 1261: 1256: 1250: 1246: 1243: 1241: 1238: 1236: 1233: 1231: 1228: 1226: 1223: 1221: 1218: 1217: 1215: 1211: 1208: 1206: 1203: 1201: 1198: 1197: 1195: 1192: 1187: 1186: 1185: 1181: 1177: 1176:MartinPoulter 1172: 1171: 1170: 1166: 1161: 1155: 1150: 1146: 1142: 1138: 1134: 1133: 1132: 1128: 1124: 1123:MartinPoulter 1119: 1114: 1113: 1112: 1111: 1107: 1102: 1096: 1092: 1088: 1084: 1075: 1071: 1067: 1063: 1062:MartinPoulter 1059: 1058: 1057: 1056: 1052: 1048: 1040: 1038: 1034: 1030: 1026: 1022: 1016: 1008: 1006: 1005: 1001: 997: 993: 985: 983: 982: 977: 973: 969: 964: 959: 953: 949: 945: 941: 940:MartinPoulter 936: 932: 927: 926: 925: 924: 920: 919:contributions 916: 912: 911:Lord Sjones23 908: 904: 900: 896: 888: 884: 880: 876: 875:MartinPoulter 872: 871:non sequiturs 868: 864: 863: 862: 861: 857: 853: 847: 843: 839: 836: 835: 829: 825: 823: 818: 817: 806: 805: 804: 800: 796: 795:MartinPoulter 791: 788: 785: 784: 783: 782: 778: 774: 765: 761: 757: 753: 749: 748: 747: 746: 742: 738: 733: 729: 728: 723: 716: 713: 711: 710: 706: 702: 698: 690: 687: 685: 684: 680: 676: 672: 671: 666: 665: 660: 656: 655: 647: 645: 644: 640: 636: 628: 626: 625: 621: 617: 613: 610: 604: 600: 595: 590: 584: 583: 582: 581: 576: 571: 565: 564: 559: 555: 550: 542: 540: 539: 535: 531: 523: 517: 513: 509: 505: 504: 501: 498: 495: 490: 484: 482: 481: 476: 472: 467: 462: 457: 452: 443: 441: 440: 436: 432: 431:James Council 423: 416: 413: 406: 403: 396: 392: 382: 378: 377: 371: 369: 368: 364: 360: 352: 350: 349: 345: 341: 332: 330: 329: 325: 321: 317: 312: 309: 305: 299: 295: 291: 287: 279: 277: 276: 272: 268: 265:Kind regards 263: 257: 255: 254: 250: 246: 241: 238: 235: 234: 231: 230: 229: 220: 216: 205: 201: 198: 196: 195: 191: 187: 183: 182:MartinPoulter 175: 169: 166: 164: 162: 154: 150: 144: 143: 140: 137: 132: 127: 121: 119: 116: 112: 108: 104: 100: 90:Nancy Orschel 89: 83: 80: 78: 75: 73: 70: 67: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 3353: 3315:Gerda Arendt 3312: 3282: 3281: 3197: 3191: 3188: 3179:Dear Martin, 3178: 3137: 3105:Andy's edits 3101:Talk to Andy 3092:Andy Mabbett 3077: 3041:Gerda Arendt 3038: 3020: 3000: 2996: 2994:the theory. 2992: 2989: 2981: 2943: 2927: 2909: 2901: 2892: 2883: 2875: 2866: 2853: 2825: 2813: 2745: 2706: 2676: 2673: 2671:Hey Martin, 2670: 2647: 2591: 2588:Re BSRA wiki 2568: 2565: 2520: 2514: 2511: 2509:Hi Martin, 2508: 2456: 2453: 2421: 2342: 2326:Agapemonites 2323: 2264: 2219: 2205: 2185: 2157:— Preceding 2149: 2137: 2130: 2109: 2102: 2084: 2016: 1980: 1949: 1877: 1857: 1853: 1849: 1846: 1832: 1828: 1813: 1764: 1749: 1713: 1708: 1701: 1700: 1694: 1650:— Preceding 1645: 1642: 1638: 1634: 1631: 1609: 1601: 1566:— Preceding 1562: 1559: 1516: 1493: 1475:Gerda Arendt 1472: 1446: 1445: 1413: 1409: 1407: 1402: 1385: 1364: 1304:— Preceding 1300: 1296: 1095:Aaron Swartz 1079: 1044: 1041:drg55 appeal 1019:— Preceding 1012: 989: 965:. Cheers, -- 960: 957: 892: 848: 844: 840: 837: 830: 826: 819: 812: 769: 731: 725: 719: 693: 673: 667: 661: 657: 651: 632: 614: 611: 608: 561: 546: 527: 499: 451:done my best 447: 427: 401: 356: 336: 313: 283: 264: 261: 242: 239: 236: 223: 222: 208: 179: 138: 103:Nancyorschel 97:— Preceding 93: 65: 43: 37: 3022:DDLancaster 2832:Arunbandana 2188:User:Penbat 1732:quick check 1632:Hi Martin, 996:Anne Delong 958:Hi Martin, 935:User:Penbat 752:Philafrenzy 737:Philafrenzy 675:Mcnabber091 648:Dear Martin 530:Lbertolotti 466:the article 36:This is an 2990:Hi there, 2912:Anna Koval 2903:API. I've 2566:Hi again. 2546:. Cheers, 2436:Agricola44 2424:Geffen AfD 2415:Regarding 2385:cyberbot I 2113:Adam Blake 1728:here's how 1711:geneticist 1656:JoeJeffrey 1542:DutchTreat 1523:DutchTreat 1378:arrowgold 1141:James Gall 1118:James Gall 1083:James Gall 909:? Thanks, 393:you for a 333:Go for it! 318:. Thanks, 145:Hi Martin, 2810:A Request 2611:Coloneldr 2595:Coloneldr 2505:Thank you 2380:report it 2375:this edit 2362:consensus 2277:this page 2216:this edit 2081:template. 1766:Caroline 1709:... that 1610:Lova Falk 1572:Arrowgold 1500:Lawsonstu 1420:–Mabeenot 1382:Exciting! 1368:Arrowgold 629:Hi Martin 402:Lova Falk 391:nominated 340:Canoe1967 302:Read the 82:Archive 5 77:Archive 4 72:Archive 3 66:Archive 2 60:Archive 1 2840:contribs 2758:ToniSant 2715:Natbrock 2575:RStoakes 2484:RStoakes 2467:RStoakes 2171:contribs 2163:Golanubi 2159:unsigned 2110:Thanks, 1964:Barnstar 1755:nominate 1738:DYKSTATS 1664:contribs 1652:unsigned 1643:Thanks. 1580:contribs 1568:unsigned 1563:Thanks 1433:Precious 1410:Signpost 1403:Signpost 1318:contribs 1306:unsigned 1035:) (UTC) 1033:contribs 1021:unsigned 889:Bullying 633:Hello! - 616:Nigatt59 524:Question 186:Lmnapier 160:Gobōnobō 157:Cheers, 111:contribs 99:unsigned 3357:Ohuanam 3192:outside 2822:Request 2774:Thanks 2454:Hello, 2417:WP:PROF 2366:comment 1361:orphans 1345:Edwardx 1310:Stmeier 1293:Thanks. 668:China: 556:at the 454:but it 448:I have 424:Thanks! 353:Thanks. 320:DPL bot 290:Charity 237:Hello, 39:archive 3294:, for 3253:Tikmok 3216:Tikmok 3200:Tikmok 2970:Penbat 2480:Hello 2391:Online 2372:about 2310:Faddle 2305:Fiddle 2229:WP:BAN 2143:Ocaasi 1458:, for 1388:Cdedaj 972:WiR/OS 359:KDDory 258:Thanks 3056:Gerda 2432:cruft 2041:Email 1800:Trevj 1647:Joe 1603:read. 1255:Trevj 1160:Trevj 1101:Trevj 1047:Drg55 1025:Drg55 852:Drg55 773:Drg55 605:hello 589:Senra 570:Senra 471:Senra 389:I've 16:< 3361:talk 3340:talk 3319:talk 3300:and 3257:talk 3242:talk 3227:talk 3204:talk 3165:talk 3149:talk 3124:talk 3116:Andy 3064:talk 3045:talk 3035:True 3026:talk 2974:talk 2964:and 2920:talk 2836:talk 2816:here 2800:talk 2790:and 2762:talk 2719:talk 2683:talk 2660:talk 2621:talk 2599:talk 2579:talk 2552:talk 2526:talk 2495:talk 2471:talk 2440:talk 2405:talk 2285:talk 2167:talk 2117:talk 2090:talk 2029:talk 1955:talk 1865:talk 1839:talk 1821:talk 1805:talk 1772:talk 1660:talk 1618:talk 1576:talk 1546:talk 1527:talk 1504:talk 1479:talk 1462:and 1424:talk 1392:talk 1372:talk 1349:talk 1314:talk 1275:talk 1260:talk 1180:talk 1165:talk 1127:talk 1106:talk 1066:talk 1051:talk 1029:talk 1000:talk 976:talk 944:talk 915:talk 879:talk 856:talk 799:talk 777:talk 756:talk 741:talk 705:talk 697:here 679:talk 639:talk 620:talk 594:talk 575:talk 534:talk 512:talk 475:talk 435:talk 410:talk 363:talk 344:talk 324:talk 271:talk 249:talk 190:talk 107:talk 3099:); 2968:.-- 2370:bot 2331:Rod 2076:ygm 2071:or 1989:Rod 1798:-- 1689:On 1253:-- 1158:-- 1149:ICE 1099:-- 1085:'s 458:is 304:FAQ 202:of 3363:) 3342:) 3321:) 3313:-- 3310:! 3259:) 3244:) 3229:) 3206:) 3167:) 3151:) 3126:) 3118:. 3103:; 3086:}} 3080:{{ 3066:) 3047:) 3028:) 2976:) 2922:) 2907:. 2842:) 2838:• 2802:) 2786:, 2782:, 2778:, 2764:) 2721:) 2685:) 2677:-- 2662:) 2623:) 2601:) 2581:) 2554:) 2528:) 2497:) 2473:) 2446:. 2442:) 2407:) 2382:.— 2291:) 2287:- 2255:, 2252:, 2249:, 2243:, 2220:do 2173:) 2169:• 2092:) 2079:}} 2073:{{ 2069:}} 2063:{{ 2031:) 1957:) 1867:) 1841:) 1823:) 1807:) 1796:. 1774:) 1730:, 1693:, 1666:) 1662:• 1582:) 1578:• 1548:) 1529:) 1506:) 1481:) 1473:-- 1470:! 1426:) 1394:) 1374:) 1351:) 1320:) 1316:• 1277:) 1262:) 1182:) 1167:) 1129:) 1108:) 1068:) 1053:) 1031:• 1002:) 978:) 970:- 946:) 921:) 917:- 881:) 858:) 801:) 779:) 758:) 743:) 707:) 681:) 641:) 622:) 536:) 514:) 437:) 397:! 365:) 346:) 326:) 296:| 273:) 251:) 243:-- 224:— 221:. 192:) 113:) 109:• 3359:( 3338:( 3317:( 3255:( 3240:( 3225:( 3218:: 3214:@ 3202:( 3163:( 3147:( 3122:( 3095:( 3062:( 3043:( 3024:( 2972:( 2918:( 2834:( 2798:( 2760:( 2717:( 2681:( 2658:( 2619:( 2613:: 2609:@ 2597:( 2577:( 2550:( 2540:: 2536:@ 2524:( 2493:( 2486:: 2482:@ 2469:( 2438:( 2403:( 2283:( 2165:( 2119:) 2115:( 2088:( 2027:( 1953:( 1863:( 1837:( 1819:( 1803:( 1786:) 1782:( 1770:( 1753:( 1744:. 1734:) 1726:( 1658:( 1574:( 1544:( 1525:( 1502:( 1477:( 1422:( 1390:( 1370:( 1347:( 1312:( 1273:( 1258:( 1178:( 1163:( 1125:( 1104:( 1064:( 1049:( 1027:( 998:( 974:( 942:( 913:( 877:( 854:( 797:( 775:( 754:( 739:( 703:( 677:( 637:( 618:( 596:) 592:( 577:) 573:( 532:( 510:( 508:㓟 477:) 473:( 433:( 361:( 342:( 322:( 310:. 292:( 269:( 247:( 188:( 105:( 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index