Knowledge

User talk:Marek Wolf

Source đź“ť

641:. The prevailing opinion at Knowledge is not to cite your own papers directly but to place the proposed material on an article talk page and wait for other editors to comment on its suitability for inclusion. As it happens I have many of those pages "watched" and would have been willing to consider the content myself. If you were to attempt to force the material in by adding it, or getting others to add it, repeatedly and without discussion, the mathematics editor community would tend to react rather negatively to that behaviour irrespective of the quality of the content. I would urge you to join in the discussion and agree to abide by the local customs for adding this content. 663: 446: 740:
editing while logged out, then you should acknowledge that's a bad idea and refrain from doing it again. You also need to acknowledge that hastily reverting other editors changes without discussion is also deprecated. It may be a bit unpalatable, but Knowledge is surprisingly harsh on people, however expert they may be, who refuse to abide by its conventions, which are sometimes unobvious.
492:, references to non-peer-reviewed papers may be included if referenced in an article of general circulation, but, for mathematical articles, we prefer to reference only peer-reviwed articles. I'm not going to quote the precise Knowledge policies here, as the box above gives adequate reasons, but we prefer to have non-trivial results sourced in peer-reviewed articles. — 762:). However, as an academic working on articles in your area of expertise, and as an expert, and as a new editor strictly here for contributing encyclopedic content, you are out of luck. (This last explains the one-sidedness of references already in the articles.) Knowledge is particluarly harsh on new editors who are not part of the in crowd and don't want to waste time 512: 321: 739:
request, acknowledging that current practice strongly prefers you not to insert references to your own publications and research directly, but by proposing them on an article talk page and letting other editors review them first (I would be happy to do this myself, for example). If you were indeed
538:
content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about
406:
indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
398:. Knowledge gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Knowledge, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an 461:
in the article. Keeping Knowledge accurate and verifiable is very important, and as you might be aware there is currently a push to improve the quality of Knowledge by encouraging editors to
766:
to editors who have not a clue about the subjct matter. Like many academics, you may have time to edit content, but you might not want to hang around and discuss it with the
516: 638: 293: 81: 250: 160: 707: 430: 155: 333: 255: 71: 480:
As you have the same name as the person the conjectures are attributed to, I've removed them until such time as you can provide a
520: 403: 67: 84:
on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to
588: 564: 535: 328: 528: 429:. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at 419: 399: 165: 465:
they used when adding content. Can you provide in the article specific references to any books, articles, websites or other
560: 382: 303: 108: 44: 622: 553:
articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
140: 63: 691: 603: 183: 773:
You will never be able to abide by the conventions, they are arbitrarily enforced to keep you off the playground. --(
540: 466: 414: 226: 208: 203: 670: 474: 150: 767: 611: 683: 596: 592: 524: 198: 16:
I would like to thank you for your contributions to Knowledge. However, it is recommended that you use the
687: 587:
Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to
497: 485: 370: 348: 145: 96: 32: 25: 745: 646: 630: 489: 338: 298: 21: 519:
your contributions to Knowledge, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things
283: 774: 607: 602:
For information on how to contribute to Knowledge when you have a conflict of interest, please see
395: 343: 260: 778: 288: 135: 686:
logged in and not logged in and self-promotion. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to
539:
that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by
80:
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to
20:
button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, and prevents clogging up
758:) or even become a Wikipedian in Residence to advertise your business with links in articles ( 493: 380: 106: 87: 42: 17: 741: 733: 697: 642: 626: 546:
If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:
445: 715: 662: 754:
You could also become an administrator and freely add your own publications to articles (
92:. Below are some recommended guidelines to facilitate your involvement. Happy Editing! -- 574: 462: 458: 426: 188: 770:
who are here to socialize and climb the corporate ladder rather than create content.
755: 615: 265: 193: 759: 679: 470: 453: 438: 377: 367: 103: 93: 39: 29: 573:
to the Knowledge article or website of your organization in other articles (see
711: 690:. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may 782: 749: 719: 650: 511: 500: 384: 110: 46: 567:, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors. 320: 763: 583:
so that you do not accidentally breach Knowledge's content policies.
410:
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
237: 122: 57: 661: 444: 319: 639:
Knowledge talk:WikiProject Mathematics#Cramér's conjecture
551:
Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating
457:
is very much appreciated. However, you did not provide
534:
All editors are required to comply with Knowledge's
559:. Everyone is welcome to provide information about 451:Your recent contribution to the Knowledge article 694:by adding the following text below this notice: 604:our frequently asked questions for organizations 484:source. In the case of something as notable as 469:that will allow people to verify the content in 70:. If you decide that you need help, check out 543:and writing with as little bias as possible. 8: 473:? You can use a citation method listed at 729:If it helps, here's my advice. Post an 557:Be cautious about deletion discussions 477:that best suits this article. Thanks! 7: 531:or close connection to the subject. 431:Knowledge:Media copyright questions 74:, ask me on my talk page, or place 390:License tagging for Image:Gmax.jpg 14: 72:Knowledge:Where to ask a question 510: 706:. However, you should read the 433:. 13:05, 11 October 2006 (UTC) 425:This is an automated notice by 621:Please join the discussion at 420:Knowledge:Image copyright tags 1: 674:from editing for a period of 616:00:27, 27 February 2014 (UTC) 146:The five pillars of Knowledge 118: 53: 633:) 22:42, 1 March 2014 (UTC) 593:verifiability of information 501:15:01, 12 October 2006 (UTC) 385:12:57, 11 October 2006 (UTC) 218:Getting more Knowledge rules 161:How to write a great article 111:12:57, 11 October 2006 (UTC) 66:to Knowledge! Thank you for 47:12:57, 11 October 2006 (UTC) 251:New contributors' help page 175:Getting your info out there 799: 783:18:11, 10 March 2014 (UTC) 505: 415:Knowledge:Image use policy 266:Frequently Asked Questions 750:18:24, 2 March 2014 (UTC) 720:14:57, 2 March 2014 (UTC) 708:guide to appealing blocks 688:make useful contributions 651:07:47, 2 March 2014 (UTC) 623:Talk:Cramér's conjecture 334:Pages needing attention 256:Where to ask a question 666: 581:Exercise great caution 521:you have written about 515:Hello, Marek Wolf. We 449: 404:image description page 324: 702:Your reason here ~~~~ 665: 589:neutral point of view 536:neutral point of view 490:twin prime conjecture 486:Goldbach's conjecture 459:references or sources 448: 394:Thanks for uploading 329:Cleaning up vandalism 323: 189:Neutral Point of View 28:. Thanks again. -- 565:deletion discussions 529:conflict of interest 684:Cramér's conjecture 561:independent sources 525:Cramér's conjecture 506:Cramér's conjecture 304:Conflict resolution 86:always fill in the 768:Randies from Boise 667: 450: 325: 156:Be bold in editing 141:How to edit a page 136:Knowledge Tutorial 68:your contributions 62:Hello Marek Wolf! 692:appeal this block 636: 527:, you may have a 437:Contributions to 364: 363: 360: 359: 356: 355: 313:Getting technical 234: 233: 184:Cite your sources 117: 116: 790: 738: 732: 705: 634: 541:reliable sources 514: 475:inline citations 467:reliable sources 463:cite the sources 375: 238: 209:Image use policy 204:Uploading images 123: 119: 101: 78: 58: 54: 37: 798: 797: 793: 792: 791: 789: 788: 787: 736: 730: 727: 722: 695: 659: 597:autobiographies 523:in the article 508: 478: 442: 402:applied to the 392: 371: 314: 294:Sign your posts 276: 243: 219: 176: 151:Manual of Style 128: 127:Getting Started 113: 97: 76: 33: 12: 11: 5: 796: 794: 726: 723: 668:You have been 660: 658: 655: 654: 653: 608:David Eppstein 606:. Thank you. — 585: 584: 578: 575:Knowledge:Spam 568: 554: 507: 504: 443: 441: 435: 423: 422: 417: 396:Image:Gmax.jpg 391: 388: 362: 361: 358: 357: 354: 353: 352: 351: 346: 341: 336: 331: 316: 315: 312: 309: 308: 307: 306: 301: 296: 291: 286: 278: 277: 274: 271: 270: 269: 268: 263: 258: 253: 245: 244: 241: 235: 232: 231: 230: 229: 227:Policy Library 221: 220: 217: 214: 213: 212: 211: 206: 201: 196: 191: 186: 178: 177: 174: 171: 170: 169: 168: 163: 158: 153: 148: 143: 138: 130: 129: 126: 115: 114: 82:sign your name 61: 51: 22:recent changes 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 795: 786: 784: 780: 776: 771: 769: 765: 761: 757: 756:User:Smith609 752: 751: 747: 743: 735: 724: 721: 717: 713: 709: 703: 699: 693: 689: 685: 681: 677: 673: 672: 664: 656: 652: 648: 644: 640: 632: 628: 624: 620: 619: 618: 617: 613: 609: 605: 600: 598: 594: 590: 582: 579: 576: 572: 571:Avoid linking 569: 566: 562: 558: 555: 552: 549: 548: 547: 544: 542: 537: 532: 530: 526: 522: 518: 513: 503: 502: 499: 495: 491: 487: 483: 476: 472: 468: 464: 460: 456: 455: 447: 440: 436: 434: 432: 428: 421: 418: 416: 413: 412: 411: 408: 405: 401: 397: 389: 387: 386: 383: 381: 379: 376: 374: 369: 350: 347: 345: 342: 340: 337: 335: 332: 330: 327: 326: 322: 318: 317: 311: 310: 305: 302: 300: 297: 295: 292: 290: 287: 285: 282: 281: 280: 279: 275:Getting along 273: 272: 267: 264: 262: 259: 257: 254: 252: 249: 248: 247: 246: 240: 239: 236: 228: 225: 224: 223: 222: 216: 215: 210: 207: 205: 202: 200: 199:Verifiability 197: 195: 194:Point of View 192: 190: 187: 185: 182: 181: 180: 179: 173: 172: 167: 164: 162: 159: 157: 154: 152: 149: 147: 144: 142: 139: 137: 134: 133: 132: 131: 125: 124: 121: 120: 112: 109: 107: 105: 102: 100: 95: 91: 89: 83: 79: 73: 69: 65: 60: 59: 56: 55: 52: 49: 48: 45: 43: 41: 38: 36: 31: 27: 23: 19: 772: 760:user:Johnbod 753: 728: 701: 680:edit warring 675: 669: 637:And also at 601: 586: 580: 570: 556: 550: 545: 533: 509: 494:Arthur Rubin 481: 479: 471:Prime number 454:Prime number 452: 439:Prime number 424: 409: 393: 372: 365: 349:Village pump 242:Getting Help 166:WikiProjects 98: 88:edit summary 85: 75: 50: 34: 26:page history 15: 742:Deltahedron 643:Deltahedron 627:Deltahedron 339:Peer review 299:Wikipedians 657:March 2014 635:Additional 284:Wikiquette 77:{{helpme}} 764:kowtowing 482:published 427:OrphanBot 400:image tag 344:Utilities 261:Help Desk 775:AfadsBad 710:first. 700:|reason= 676:one week 289:Civility 24:and the 734:unblock 698:unblock 671:blocked 517:welcome 488:or the 64:Welcome 18:preview 725:Advice 595:, and 498:(talk) 712:Bbb23 368:Squid 94:Squid 90:field 30:Squid 779:talk 746:talk 716:talk 678:for 647:talk 631:talk 612:talk 682:at 625:. 563:in 496:| 785:) 781:) 748:) 737:}} 731:{{ 718:) 704:}} 696:{{ 649:) 614:) 599:. 591:, 577:). 366:-- 777:( 744:( 714:( 645:( 629:( 610:( 378:K 373:S 104:K 99:S 40:K 35:S

Index

preview
recent changes
page history
Squid
S
K


12:57, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
Welcome
your contributions
Knowledge:Where to ask a question
sign your name
edit summary
Squid
S
K


12:57, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
Knowledge Tutorial
How to edit a page
The five pillars of Knowledge
Manual of Style
Be bold in editing
How to write a great article
WikiProjects
Cite your sources
Neutral Point of View
Point of View

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑