Knowledge

User talk:Markoulw

Source 📝

1173:
an orchestrated attempt to mute me out of the Afd discussion. You have deleted all my posts on the specific Afd and then banned me with some lousy convenient excuses about offending you personally because I spoke out the truth about your unaccepted behavior to newcomers inconsistent lies and non existing arguments and harassment policy violations and in general rude and unfriendly behavior both form editors and administrators. If you continue not allowing me as the major contributor of the WP article to participate on the discussion and holding me outside the Afd at least until the Afd is finished I will report to Wikimedia, each and every one participating in this masquerade, and will hold you personal responsible for what will happen next. You have been warned.
947:@Markoulw: Based on the above screed, and a review of your contribution history, which leads me to conclude that you are on Knowledge only to promote the apparently very questionable research of one Mr. Markoulakis, who I assume is you or a relative, I am indefinitely blocking you from editing Knowledge. Sandstein 18:37, 2 August 2018 (UTC). Because you breached half of WP policies by an attempted outing with your little comment above 627: 509:, not credentials (Knowledge or otherwise) or experience. Meaning, Lithopsian does not have more authority on Knowledge content than Newslinger, and neither do you. Of course, anyone can build a good reputation over the years for intelligent, well-reasoned contributions, or list their credentials on their userpage, but they cannot use their credentials or experience to 'win' a discussion. For more information, see 408: 567: 1556: 1087: 862: 674: 727: 377: 18: 1672: 136: 272:- in other words, when someone reverts one of your edits, don't get into a war about it, but open the subject for discussion. The correct place for such discussion is the article talk page, although the talk page of a newly-created article is unlikely to be visited. A more formal approach would be to reinstate the article and open an 1258:
COI or not COI as long a NPV is made in good faith and willingness to do any suggested edits I would have been asked for, but they didn't just the plain AFD parody and irrelevant to my complaint here which refers to WP general policies and damaging attitude and arbitrary decisions and incompetence of
1172:
You are not giving me the opportunity to defend my contributions to the WP "ferrolens" article on the active Afd discussion. This is immoral and called censorship and discrimination. All other excuses for banning me are irrelevant at this point where the Afd is running and could easily interpreted as
1347:
get much attention due to their subject matter, while other subjects get little to almost no attention until someone chooses to work on it. Since you state you are not interested in hearing any more about Knowledge policies and community, though, I will respect that decision you made. Reading your
1313:
I have reported solid and self-evident based facts (for example you don't have to have any academic proof to see that it is a lens with lights around it) and operation description of a more than notable device which exists over 10 years now and has a valid presence in the public domain and recently
1262:
I can not understand how a newcomer user Newslinger, without any full article editing and debuted in Knowledge just at April of 2018 and since then did only patrolling and after my AFC ferrolens article passed clean through three Senior Editors II and an WP administrator, and without any other major
1254:
Without asking me to make any edits or edits by themselves they rushed in on a first Afd and deleted my "Quantum field of magnet" (autoedited) article. Then they marched in to AFD delete my second article (nothing to do with WP just personal dispute reasons, many of them past initially the article
1242:
Maybe you should reassess the people which you give the right patrolling your pages and making arbitrary decisions for deletions of article and in general your procedure mechanisms of doing so and harassing newcomers. These are amateurs at best and should not have such power given specially when it
1460:
It says "should typically be involved". There's no reasonable doubt in this case, see the sockpuppet investigations. If you disagree, you are free to remove the ban notice from the user's talk page. It makes little practical difference here in any case. Given the rampant abuse, I can't imagine any
304:
No. Respect. I was merely waiting for your response to my explanations of why this separate page is important before I do anything. Sorry, to see that you feel that you were threatened by me . On the contrary my intentions were to respect your decision and wait for your reconsideration after the
1317:
I included all related academic research I could find with priority the completely dedicated studies to the ferrolens/ferrocel device in a short concise way which a normal physics reader can understand. I have linked the article with related terms WP articles. It is a small informative concise
1246:
Also the Afd procedure is a parody... How, this can be regarded as a general WP consensus tool when you give the right to people who edited the article for deletion to participate on the Afd? Obviously their opinion is biased. You should fix that in the future. Also consensus with less than 10
806:
unBLOCK: Markoulw: Based on the above screed, and a review of your contribution history, which leads me to conclude that you are on Knowledge only to promote the apparently very questionable research of one Mr. Markoulakis, who I assume is you or a relative, I am indefinitely blocking you from
1279:
Wikimedia does not decide who has administrator powers here, the community as a whole does. While we welcome users with knowledge in various fields, being an expert in a subject gives you no special status or rights here. You must collaborate with everyone here regardless of their level of
1525:
I only ask because whether there was or wasn't CU evidence involved needs to be clear, as it affects whether the ban is appealable to the Arbitration Committee in addition to the community. This was something I warned about in the discussion about that policy change. ~
593:
until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
1325:
Surely WP in my experience is not a fair-play place and the whole premise of anyone unfit which can edit and judge anyone and even harass him/her under some BS WP medal or title or not given to him/her playing God, is really a mess and more like anarchy.
240:
If the revert will not be undertaken by the Senior editor in the next 6hours period I will revert the page so it can be further edited and expanded in the future. I will keep the physics-stub category though until the page is expanded sufficiently.
534:
4. Finally, if the article is deleted, don't take it personally. Move on, edit something else, and if the subject is really a hot topic in academia, more papers will follow and you will one day be able to recreate the article with adequate sources.
276:, a discussion about whether it should be deleted. Possible outcomes would include a redirect rather than an outright delete - or keeping the article. Before going that way, you should familiarise yourself with Knowledge's definition of 224:
This page refers to a recent discovery made and published on magnetic fields using the device ferrolens and is apart from the ferrolens page because its potential significance for physics in general and academic research and development.
1195:
As before, you have not addressed the reason for your block in this request. I am declining it. If you continue to make such unblock requests, you risk losing the ability to edit this page, making it even harder to get unblocked.
1321:
So please spare me your wisdom about WP policies and WP community, and let's talk rather of arbitrarily decisions of hot headed editors messing up totally normal articles and leaving total rubbish untouched. What about that?
1250:
I did my best to re edit and reform my articles for NPV and answered with valid arguments in the article talk pages all the issues they have set without any counter arguments on their behalf presented or suggestions.
597:
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
1318:
article rich in media references. I even included video demonstrations (creative commons) which were IP addressed taken down. Where is the NPV violation here? and what about COI from third-parties roaming WP?
984:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
1314:
in academia (whereas other similar existing WP articles don't have any academic references). This device is called ferrocell or else ferrolens and is closely related with the Helle-Shaw cell WP article.
305:
explanations I have given to you, but I can not wait indefinitely. I now have an expanded version of the page "Quantum field of magnet" I will update it with and kindly ask you to review and reconsider.
1263:
edits on the article afterwards, can propose the article for AFD?! This is disrespectful towards the Senior Editors and administrators who passed the article clean and just a personal dispute with me.
1247:
participants of the Afd can not be representative for WP in my opinion and make a rule that AfC articles not to be allowed to be proposed for Afd or prod deletion only for mandatory re editing.
1348:
statement above, it sounds like Knowledge isn't for you. As I indicated, there are more appropriate forums for you to do what (I think) it is that you want to do, some of them may be listed at
157: 416: 385: 337: 1243:
comes to science articles and most of them don't have a glue. However a user like Newslinger, could ever peer-review a science article and propose it for Afd really escapes me...
1644:
block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the
389: 22: 100:
In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see
845:
You need to follow the directions in the unblock request in order to request an unblock, what you are doing now is embedding your comment into the block template. --
1259:
some inflammatory editors and administrators of WP which are ill given the power and permitted to vandalize WP AFC articles and hares newcomers discouraging them.
351:. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top. 686: 516:
2. It's normal in my experience for editors to comment on deletion discussions even though they wouldn't ordinarily edit in that area. Don't take it personally.
1288:
as Knowledge defines it. If you just want to post your research or expertise for the world to see, there are any number of more appropriate forums to do so.
1230:
template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.
1048:
template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.
264:
Threats, nice. That's not how WP works, I'm afraid. You are welcome to revert changes made by any other editor, but the recommended course of action is
807:
editing Knowledge. Sandstein 18:37, 2 August 2018 (UTC). Because you breached half of WP policies by an attempted outing with your little comment above
590: 579: 472: 1444:
Given that the banning policy says CU evidence should be involved before such a step is taken, can you comment on where CU evidence was involved? ~
1683: 1652: 1632: 745: 1255:
clean) "Ferrolens" (AFC article for already three months now!) and its now under "discussion" from the same people who deleted my first article.
101: 1715: 1592: 1127: 902: 468: 336:
I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Quantum field of magnet should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at
107:
Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.
1627: 1215: 1033: 1011: 752: 280:
which may not conicide with your own personal feelings or the normal expectations in your field. Just for the record, please read
1662: 1645: 635: 171: 123: 93: 698:
Read through the links others have given you - your comments here are wholly unacceptable and you have been previously warned.
1710: 1587: 1122: 897: 458: 412: 73: 35: 26: 1343:
As this is a volunteer project, people choose what they want to work on, when they want to work on it. Some articles like
682: 380:
Welcome to Knowledge. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like you to
167: 1280:
expertise. Knowledge is not a platform for you to post your research; Knowledge is only interested in what independent
631: 381: 40: 1099:
Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the
874:
Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the
1679: 1641: 1637: 1100: 875: 740: 735: 691: 643: 583: 1563: 1094: 869: 528: 454: 446: 327: 231:
This is important and the Knowledge community must be aware and can not be dismissed from this information.
1729: 1606: 1141: 916: 60: 347:
is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on
531:) implicated in this discussion. Your username is similar to one of the authors of the primary paper. 714: 701: 661: 648: 608: 462: 445:
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited
361: 348: 289: 30: 1506: 1502: 153: 1659: 506: 420: 1309:
And where may I ask does the WP "ferrolens" article does injustice on your above mentioned points?
284:
and consider its implications for you, as explained in more detail at the top of your talk page.
639: 574: 558: 524: 142: 127: 25:
your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things
1772: 951: 811: 545: 488: 424: 393: 277: 269: 112: 33:(COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the 1706: 1583: 1357: 1352:. If you should change your mind about Knowledge, you are welcome to make another request. 1293: 1224: 1201: 1042: 948: 808: 758: 510: 1466: 1427: 1413: 1399: 1076: 1068: 1019: 601: 357: 285: 166:. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can 465:, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. 237:
Please reinstate and undelete the page "Quantum field of magnet" in its previous state.
1064: 792: 770: 83: 1509:
editing through the same range as Markoulw attempting to bust through autoconfirmed.--
626: 1689: 1626:
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the
1527: 1481: 1445: 1368: 1349: 1329: 1264: 1174: 1105: 963: 955: 880: 831: 818: 520: 479:
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these
430: 344: 312: 281: 273: 265: 250: 50:
articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
1768: 1391: 1344: 1281: 1060: 814: 540: 523:... I'm sorry to say this, but they have a point. Most of your edits are to pages ( 484: 480: 108: 407: 233:
This page deserves its own space and I was in the process to evolve and expand it.
1422:
This talk page is to be used to discuss getting your block lifted. That's all. --
638:
notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at
190: 1353: 1289: 1285: 1197: 1408:
You are not permitted to remove declined unblock requests for active blocks. --
673: 519:
3. In regards to your complaints about Newslinger baselessly accusing you of a
229:
It suggests the discovery of magnetic monopoles in essence inside every magnet.
1510: 1487: 1477: 1462: 1439: 1423: 1409: 1395: 1072: 1015: 846: 1755: 450: 163: 726: 1671: 989:
the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Knowledge,
751:
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the
755:, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: 376: 170:
without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to
17: 1566:
has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.
1776: 1537: 1518: 1495: 1470: 1455: 1431: 1417: 1403: 1376: 1361: 1337: 1297: 1272: 1205: 1182: 1080: 1023: 971: 854: 839: 826: 801: 779: 720: 667: 615: 551: 492: 435: 401: 365: 320: 293: 258: 209: 162:
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to
116: 954:
AND I DISPUTE YOU AS AN WP ADMINISTRATOR. YOU SHOULD BLOCK YOURSELF!
817:
AND I DISPUTE YOU AS AN WP ADMINISTRATOR. YOU SHOULD BLOCK YOURSELF!
502:
A couple of things that are important to understand about Knowledge:
1760:
was submitted on Aug 20, 2018 19:47:36. This review is now closed.
419:. Such edits are disruptive, and may appear to other editors to be 392:
to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --
135: 189:
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
145:, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. 1394:. No admin may lift your block without community consensus. -- 384:
while interacting with other editors, which you did not do on
1630:, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the 1670: 1554: 1085: 860: 725: 513:, an essay which contains useful advice for expert editors. 134: 1655:
that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.
1562:
Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an
696:. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. 1212:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please
1030:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please
178:
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the
1232:
Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
1050:
Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
338:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Quantum field of magnet
1743: 1739: 1733: 1724: 1720: 1702: 1698: 1694: 1619: 1615: 1610: 1601: 1597: 1579: 1575: 1571: 1155: 1151: 1145: 1136: 1132: 1118: 1114: 1110: 930: 926: 920: 911: 907: 893: 889: 885: 786: 572:
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
449:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 417:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Quantum field of magnet
386:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Quantum field of magnet
191: 181: 1461:
administrator lifting the block in the near future. --
82:
to your organization's website in other articles (see
1093:
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an
1001:
will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
868:
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an
578:
is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge according to
423:. If you would like to experiment, please use the 72:your COI when discussing affected articles (see 56:on the talk pages of affected articles (see the 1651:Please note that there could be appeals to the 1682:is asking that their block be reviewed on the 1486:I blocked a sock yesterday, I'll dig it out.-- 1304:______________________________________________ 1284:state about a subject that indicate how it is 1055:Note that this user is now in danger of being 687:Knowledge talk:Articles for deletion/Ferrolens 995:the block is no longer necessary because you 744:from editing because it appears that you are 415:legitimate talk page comments, as you did at 8: 441:Disambiguation link notification for July 24 998:understand what you have been blocked for, 591:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Ferrolens 199:Thank you for helping improve Knowledge! 215:Revert of page "Quantum filed of magnet" 160:to see how you can improve the article. 1275:______________________________________ 1004:will make useful contributions instead. 43:for more information. We ask that you: 156:. You may like to take a look at the 152:, which is recorded on the article's 7: 505:1. Discussion are decided on editor 580:Knowledge's policies and guidelines 14: 746:not here to build an encyclopedia 589:The article will be discussed at 148:The article has been assessed as 672: 625: 565: 406: 375: 16: 1063:due to continued violations of 685:on others again, as you did at 343:If you're new to the process, 300:Dear Senior Editor Lithopsian, 36:conflict of interest guideline 1: 1684:Unblock Ticket Request System 1653:unblock ticket request system 1633:Unblock Ticket Request System 962:) 21:57, 2 August 2018 (UTC) 29:on Knowledge, you may have a 1238:Formal Complain to Wikimedia 634:. If you continue to remove 1777:19:47, 20 August 2018 (UTC) 1663:19:18, 14 August 2018 (UTC) 1538:20:54, 14 August 2018 (UTC) 1519:20:55, 14 August 2018 (UTC) 1496:20:51, 14 August 2018 (UTC) 1471:20:45, 14 August 2018 (UTC) 1456:20:43, 14 August 2018 (UTC) 1432:19:17, 14 August 2018 (UTC) 1418:19:12, 14 August 2018 (UTC) 1404:11:46, 11 August 2018 (UTC) 1097:, who declined the request. 872:, who declined the request. 220:Dear Editor Sir Lithopsian, 92:to comply with Knowledge's 1792: 1377:23:40, 8 August 2018 (UTC) 1362:22:37, 8 August 2018 (UTC) 1338:16:59, 8 August 2018 (UTC) 1298:16:31, 6 August 2018 (UTC) 1273:21:41, 4 August 2018 (UTC) 1206:16:29, 6 August 2018 (UTC) 1183:16:18, 6 August 2018 (UTC) 1081:12:59, 3 August 2018 (UTC) 1024:23:37, 2 August 2018 (UTC) 972:23:15, 2 August 2018 (UTC) 855:22:15, 2 August 2018 (UTC) 840:21:38, 2 August 2018 (UTC) 827:21:57, 2 August 2018 (UTC) 802:18:39, 2 August 2018 (UTC) 780:18:38, 2 August 2018 (UTC) 721:18:09, 2 August 2018 (UTC) 668:18:08, 2 August 2018 (UTC) 616:17:08, 2 August 2018 (UTC) 538:Thanks for understanding. 326:Deletion discussion about 117:12:46, 14 March 2018 (UTC) 1628:guide to appealing blocks 1216:guide to appealing blocks 1034:guide to appealing blocks 1012:guide to appealing blocks 753:guide to appealing blocks 552:12:58, 25 July 2018 (UTC) 493:09:09, 24 July 2018 (UTC) 436:02:59, 24 July 2018 (UTC) 402:02:49, 24 July 2018 (UTC) 366:20:07, 23 July 2018 (UTC) 321:16:18, 23 July 2018 (UTC) 294:14:46, 23 July 2018 (UTC) 259:11:06, 23 July 2018 (UTC) 48:avoid editing or creating 1550:Talk page access revoked 1372: 1333: 1268: 1178: 967: 959: 835: 822: 582:or whether it should be 316: 254: 210:14:18, 16 May 2018 (UTC) 192:leaving us some feedback 168:create articles yourself 529:Quantum field of magnet 447:Quantum field of magnet 328:Quantum field of magnet 1675: 1559: 1390:from Knowledge, under 1090: 1014:for more information. 865: 730: 694:without further notice 139: 27:you have written about 1730:change block settings 1674: 1646:Arbitration Committee 1607:change block settings 1558: 1142:change block settings 1089: 917:change block settings 864: 763:Your reason here ~~~~ 729: 636:Articles for deletion 388:. Take a look at the 345:articles for deletion 266:bold, revert, discuss 172:Articles for Creation 138: 124:Articles for creation 41:FAQ for organizations 1636:. If the block is a 785:See also my comment 692:blocked from editing 644:blocked from editing 521:conflict of interest 481:opt-out instructions 31:conflict of interest 21:Hello, Markoulw. We 459:fix with Dab solver 122:Your submission at 1756:UTRS appeal #22420 1676: 1560: 1091: 866: 731: 632:disruptive editing 471:• Join us at the 461:). Such links are 333:Hello, Markoulw, 140: 1656: 1535: 1453: 800: 778: 630:Please stop your 613: 476: 463:usually incorrect 398: 382:assume good faith 349:how to contribute 130:has been accepted 1783: 1759: 1758: 1749: 1747: 1736: 1721:abuse filter log 1718: 1716:deleted contribs 1650: 1623: 1613: 1598:abuse filter log 1595: 1593:deleted contribs 1557: 1531: 1516: 1493: 1485: 1449: 1443: 1282:reliable sources 1229: 1223: 1161: 1159: 1148: 1130: 1128:deleted contribs 1088: 1047: 1041: 1010:Please read the 936: 934: 923: 905: 903:deleted contribs 863: 852: 799: 797: 790: 777: 775: 768: 766: 719: 717: 713: 709: 704: 683:personal attacks 676: 666: 664: 660: 656: 651: 629: 611: 607: 604: 569: 568: 548: 543: 466: 455:check to confirm 434: 410: 396: 379: 208: 206: 194: 184: 94:content policies 65: 59: 20: 1791: 1790: 1786: 1785: 1784: 1782: 1781: 1780: 1765: 1754: 1753: 1737: 1727: 1713: 1692: 1666: 1604: 1590: 1569: 1555: 1552: 1534: 1511: 1488: 1475: 1452: 1437: 1384: 1240: 1235: 1227: 1221: 1220:, then use the 1209: 1186: 1149: 1139: 1125: 1108: 1101:blocking policy 1086: 1053: 1045: 1039: 1038:, then use the 1027: 975: 924: 914: 900: 883: 876:blocking policy 861: 847: 793: 791: 783: 782: 771: 769: 756: 749: 715: 711: 705: 702: 700: 662: 658: 652: 649: 647: 623: 609: 602: 570: 566: 563: 546: 541: 500: 498:About Knowledge 473:DPL WikiProject 443: 428: 399: 373: 331: 217: 212: 202: 201: 180: 174:if you prefer. 132: 63: 57: 54:propose changes 12: 11: 5: 1789: 1787: 1763: 1751: 1669: 1649: 1625: 1553: 1551: 1548: 1547: 1546: 1545: 1544: 1543: 1542: 1541: 1540: 1532: 1523: 1522: 1521: 1507:User:Bestdrily 1503:User:Aimieimag 1450: 1383: 1380: 1365: 1364: 1306: 1305: 1301: 1300: 1239: 1236: 1210: 1193: 1189:Decline reason 1170: 1166:Request reason 1163: 1084: 1028: 1008: 1007: 1006: 1005: 1002: 999: 993: 982: 978:Decline reason 945: 941:Request reason 938: 859: 858: 857: 750: 733:You have been 732: 724: 681:; if you make 622: 619: 564: 562: 557:Nomination of 555: 499: 496: 442: 439: 413:delete or edit 411:Please do not 395: 372: 369: 330: 324: 308:Kind Regards, 297: 296: 244:Kind Regards, 216: 213: 197: 196: 187: 158:grading scheme 147: 133: 131: 120: 98: 97: 87: 77: 67: 51: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1788: 1779: 1778: 1774: 1770: 1764: 1761: 1757: 1750: 1745: 1741: 1735: 1731: 1726: 1722: 1717: 1712: 1708: 1704: 1703:global blocks 1700: 1699:active blocks 1696: 1691: 1686: 1685: 1681: 1673: 1668: 1665: 1664: 1661: 1654: 1647: 1643: 1639: 1635: 1634: 1629: 1624: 1621: 1617: 1612: 1608: 1603: 1599: 1594: 1589: 1585: 1581: 1580:global blocks 1577: 1576:active blocks 1573: 1567: 1565: 1564:administrator 1549: 1539: 1536: 1530: 1524: 1520: 1517: 1515: 1508: 1504: 1501: 1500: 1499: 1498: 1497: 1494: 1492: 1483: 1479: 1474: 1473: 1472: 1468: 1464: 1459: 1458: 1457: 1454: 1448: 1441: 1436: 1435: 1434: 1433: 1429: 1425: 1420: 1419: 1415: 1411: 1406: 1405: 1401: 1397: 1393: 1389: 1381: 1379: 1378: 1374: 1370: 1363: 1359: 1355: 1351: 1346: 1342: 1341: 1340: 1339: 1335: 1331: 1327: 1323: 1319: 1315: 1312: 1310: 1303: 1302: 1299: 1295: 1291: 1287: 1283: 1278: 1277: 1276: 1274: 1270: 1266: 1260: 1256: 1252: 1248: 1244: 1237: 1234: 1233: 1226: 1219: 1217: 1208: 1207: 1203: 1199: 1192: 1190: 1185: 1184: 1180: 1176: 1169: 1167: 1162: 1157: 1153: 1147: 1143: 1138: 1134: 1129: 1124: 1120: 1119:global blocks 1116: 1115:active blocks 1112: 1107: 1102: 1098: 1096: 1095:administrator 1083: 1082: 1078: 1074: 1070: 1066: 1062: 1058: 1052: 1051: 1044: 1037: 1035: 1026: 1025: 1021: 1017: 1013: 1003: 1000: 997: 996: 994: 992: 988: 987: 986: 981: 979: 974: 973: 969: 965: 961: 957: 953: 950: 944: 942: 937: 932: 928: 922: 918: 913: 909: 904: 899: 895: 894:global blocks 891: 890:active blocks 887: 882: 877: 873: 871: 870:administrator 856: 853: 851: 844: 843: 842: 841: 837: 833: 829: 828: 824: 820: 816: 813: 810: 804: 803: 798: 796: 788: 781: 776: 774: 764: 760: 754: 747: 743: 742: 738: 737: 728: 723: 722: 718: 710: 708: 699: 695: 693: 689:, you may be 688: 684: 680: 677:This is your 675: 670: 669: 665: 657: 655: 645: 642:, you may be 641: 637: 633: 628: 620: 618: 617: 614: 612: 606: 605: 595: 592: 587: 585: 581: 577: 576: 560: 556: 554: 553: 550: 549: 544: 536: 532: 530: 526: 522: 517: 514: 512: 508: 503: 497: 495: 494: 490: 486: 482: 477: 474: 470: 464: 460: 456: 452: 448: 440: 438: 437: 432: 427:. Thank you. 426: 422: 418: 414: 409: 404: 403: 400: 391: 387: 383: 378: 370: 368: 367: 363: 359: 355: 352: 350: 346: 341: 339: 334: 329: 325: 323: 322: 318: 314: 309: 306: 302: 301: 295: 291: 287: 283: 279: 275: 271: 267: 263: 262: 261: 260: 256: 252: 248: 245: 242: 238: 235: 234: 230: 226: 222: 221: 214: 211: 205: 200: 193: 188: 185: 183: 177: 176: 175: 173: 169: 165: 159: 155: 151: 146: 144: 137: 129: 125: 121: 119: 118: 114: 110: 105: 103: 95: 91: 88: 85: 81: 80:avoid linking 78: 75: 71: 68: 62: 55: 52: 49: 46: 45: 44: 42: 38: 37: 32: 28: 24: 19: 1766: 1762: 1752: 1725:creation log 1688: 1680:blocked user 1677: 1667: 1657: 1631: 1602:creation log 1568: 1561: 1528: 1513: 1490: 1446: 1421: 1407: 1387: 1386:You are now 1385: 1366: 1345:Barack Obama 1328: 1324: 1320: 1316: 1311: 1308: 1307: 1261: 1257: 1253: 1249: 1245: 1241: 1231: 1213: 1211: 1194: 1188: 1187: 1171: 1165: 1164: 1137:creation log 1104: 1092: 1056: 1054: 1049: 1031: 1029: 1009: 990: 983: 977: 976: 946: 940: 939: 912:creation log 879: 867: 849: 830: 805: 794: 784: 772: 762: 741:indefinitely 739: 734: 706: 697: 690: 679:only warning 678: 671: 653: 624: 600: 599: 596: 588: 573: 571: 561:for deletion 539: 537: 533: 518: 515: 504: 501: 478: 444: 405: 390:welcome page 374: 356: 353: 342: 335: 332: 310: 307: 303: 299: 298: 249: 246: 243: 239: 236: 232: 228: 227: 223: 219: 218: 203: 198: 179: 161: 149: 141: 106: 99: 90:do your best 89: 79: 69: 61:request edit 53: 47: 34: 15: 1367:Thank you. 621:August 2018 150:Start-Class 74:WP:DISCLOSE 1707:autoblocks 1584:autoblocks 1512:Jezebel's 1489:Jezebel's 1133:filter log 952:WP:PRIVACY 908:filter log 848:Jezebel's 812:WP:PRIVACY 795:Sandstein 773:Sandstein 603:Newslinger 483:. Thanks, 467:(Read the 358:Lithopsian 286:Lithopsian 278:notability 66:template); 1740:checkuser 1695:block log 1642:Oversight 1638:CheckUser 1616:checkuser 1572:block log 1214:read the 1152:checkuser 1111:block log 1032:read the 949:WP:OUTING 927:checkuser 886:block log 809:WP:OUTING 716:¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 663:¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 640:Ferrolens 575:Ferrolens 559:Ferrolens 525:Ferrolens 511:WP:EXPERT 507:consensus 451:Real-time 421:vandalism 371:July 2018 311:Markoulw 247:Markoulw 182:help desk 164:Knowledge 154:talk page 143:Ferrolens 128:Ferrolens 1711:contribs 1690:Markoulw 1588:contribs 1482:BU Rob13 1369:Markoulw 1330:Markoulw 1265:Markoulw 1175:Markoulw 1123:contribs 1106:Markoulw 1069:WP:EVADE 964:Markoulw 956:Markoulw 898:contribs 881:Markoulw 832:Markoulw 819:Markoulw 761:|reason= 431:zchrykng 354:Thanks, 313:Markoulw 270:edit war 268:and not 251:Markoulw 204:etothepi 70:disclose 1769:UTRSBot 1734:unblock 1611:unblock 1286:notable 1225:unblock 1146:unblock 1065:WP:SOCK 1043:unblock 921:unblock 759:unblock 736:blocked 703:CHRISSY 650:CHRISSY 584:deleted 485:DPL bot 425:sandbox 394:Cameron 109:Melcous 102:WP:PAID 84:WP:SPAM 23:welcome 1388:banned 1382:Banned 1354:331dot 1350:WP:OUT 1290:331dot 1198:331dot 1059:under 1057:banned 282:WP:COI 1678:This 1514:Ponyo 1491:Ponyo 1478:Yamla 1463:Yamla 1440:Yamla 1424:Yamla 1410:Yamla 1396:Yamla 1392:WP:3X 1218:first 1073:Yamla 1061:WP:3X 1036:first 1016:Yamla 850:Ponyo 815:WP:HA 397:11598 1773:talk 1505:and 1480:and 1467:talk 1428:talk 1414:talk 1400:talk 1373:talk 1358:talk 1334:talk 1294:talk 1269:talk 1202:talk 1179:talk 1077:talk 1071:. -- 1067:and 1020:talk 968:talk 960:talk 836:talk 823:talk 787:here 748:. 610:talk 542:Tera 527:and 489:talk 429:{{u| 362:talk 317:talk 290:talk 255:talk 113:talk 104:). 39:and 1744:log 1660:TNT 1640:or 1622:)) 1620:log 1529:Rob 1447:Rob 1156:log 1103:). 931:log 878:). 767:. 712:❯❯❯ 707:MAD 659:❯❯❯ 654:MAD 646:. 547:TIX 469:FAQ 433:}} 340:. 274:AfD 207:👽 1775:) 1767:-- 1748:) 1738:• 1732:• 1728:• 1723:• 1719:• 1714:• 1709:• 1705:• 1701:• 1697:• 1687:: 1658:- 1614:• 1609:• 1605:• 1600:• 1596:• 1591:• 1586:• 1582:• 1578:• 1574:• 1533:13 1469:) 1451:13 1430:) 1416:) 1402:) 1375:) 1360:) 1336:) 1296:) 1271:) 1228:}} 1222:{{ 1204:) 1191:: 1181:) 1168:: 1150:• 1144:• 1140:• 1135:• 1131:• 1126:• 1121:• 1117:• 1113:• 1079:) 1046:}} 1040:{{ 1022:) 991:or 980:: 970:) 943:: 925:• 919:• 915:• 910:• 906:• 901:• 896:• 892:• 888:• 838:) 825:) 789:. 765:}} 757:{{ 598:— 586:. 491:) 475:.) 457:| 364:) 319:) 292:) 257:) 126:: 115:) 86:); 76:); 64:}} 58:{{ 1771:( 1746:) 1742:( 1693:( 1648:. 1618:( 1570:( 1484:: 1476:@ 1465:( 1442:: 1438:@ 1426:( 1412:( 1398:( 1371:( 1356:( 1332:( 1292:( 1267:( 1200:( 1177:( 1160:) 1158:) 1154:( 1109:( 1075:( 1018:( 966:( 958:( 935:) 933:) 929:( 884:( 834:( 821:( 487:( 453:( 360:( 315:( 288:( 253:( 195:. 186:. 111:( 96:.

Index

Information icon
welcome
you have written about
conflict of interest
conflict of interest guideline
FAQ for organizations
request edit
WP:DISCLOSE
WP:SPAM
content policies
WP:PAID
Melcous
talk
12:46, 14 March 2018 (UTC)
Articles for creation
Ferrolens

Ferrolens
talk page
grading scheme
Knowledge
create articles yourself
Articles for Creation
help desk
leaving us some feedback
14:18, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
Markoulw
talk
11:06, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
bold, revert, discuss

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.