Knowledge

User talk:Matt T2

Source đź“ť

31:. While your intentions were good in reverting them, those reverts left behind some garbage in the article. Please look into the article history before using "Undo" feature. Usually those kind of vandalisms /test-edits, would happen in a series of edits. We, those who are reverting, need to make sure we are reverting all such edits and not the latest edit. I have now corrected in both the above pages. Please take a look at this history of those pages, and see the diffs in my reverts, so you would understand better what I am trying to say. By the way, good job fighting against Vandalism. Much appreciated! Thanks - 159:
The warning before yours was unsigned so you couldn't easily tell the date. And I just noticed today that the previous was from July 2006, not even 2007. I'm going to delete all those old warnings. It's very possible that the current user is a totally different person from a year and a half ago.
126:
and gave him a level 4 warning. I'm just a vandal fighter who ran across this change but it doesn't seem appropriate to me. The IP's reversion was to delete his own posting minutes earlier. Perhaps he had second thought or realized it was in the wrong place. In any case it doesn't look like
141:
Arrgh, sorry I didn't look at the dates, and I think I copy and pasted the wrong one anyway. I removed it from their page. I will make sure I look at the dates next time.
127:
vandalism. And the level 4 warning for the first warning in 4 months also seems a bit excessive. Is there I something I don't know to explain this?
123: 100: 71: 62:
Please don't revert changes to my User Talk page. If you check the edit summary, you will see that those changes were made
104: 75: 24: 28: 84:"It's doesn't really concern you", I thought it was vandalism ;). Sorry for the misunderstanding. 165: 132: 161: 128: 145: 85: 41: 32: 169: 153: 136: 108: 93: 79: 70:
reasons. It's doesn't really concern you. Thanks for understanding.
49: 35: 120: 23:I saw some of your reverts made in pages like 8: 40:I'll take a look at them now. Thanks 7: 124:Special:Contributions/67.115.155.103 14: 115:Your warning to 67.115.155.103 1: 170:14:22, 17 November 2007 (UTC) 154:03:09, 17 November 2007 (UTC) 137:00:10, 17 November 2007 (UTC) 109:08:02, 18 November 2007 (UTC) 94:23:37, 16 November 2007 (UTC) 80:23:34, 16 November 2007 (UTC) 50:22:54, 16 November 2007 (UTC) 36:22:52, 16 November 2007 (UTC) 186: 119:You reverted this change 99:No harm done, really. 25:Talk:History of India 29:Shivamogga district‎ 177: 185: 184: 180: 179: 178: 176: 175: 174: 117: 60: 19: 12: 11: 5: 183: 181: 173: 172: 160:Cheers, also. 116: 113: 112: 111: 101:71.239.133.107 72:71.239.133.107 59: 58:Excuse me, sir 56: 54: 22: 18: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 182: 171: 167: 163: 158: 157: 156: 155: 151: 147: 142: 139: 138: 134: 130: 125: 121: 114: 110: 106: 102: 98: 97: 96: 95: 91: 87: 82: 81: 77: 73: 69: 65: 57: 55: 52: 51: 47: 43: 38: 37: 34: 30: 26: 16: 149: 143: 140: 118: 89: 83: 67: 63: 61: 53: 45: 39: 20: 21:Hi there, 162:Sbowers3 129:Sbowers3 146:Matt T2 144:Cheers 86:Matt T2 42:Matt T2 64:by me 166:talk 150:talk 133:talk 105:talk 90:talk 76:talk 66:for 46:talk 27:and 17:Undo 122:by 33:KNM 168:) 152:) 135:) 107:) 92:) 78:) 68:my 48:) 164:( 148:( 131:( 103:( 88:( 74:( 44:(

Index

Talk:History of India
Shivamogga district‎
KNM
22:52, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
Matt T2
talk
22:54, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
71.239.133.107
talk
23:34, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
Matt T2
talk
23:37, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
71.239.133.107
talk
08:02, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

Special:Contributions/67.115.155.103
Sbowers3
talk
00:10, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
Matt T2
talk
03:09, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
Sbowers3
talk
14:22, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑