254:, simply to help people find the content they're looking for in other articles. That is the longstanding status, seems to be accepted by most editors, and is the way matters should remain. All your comments about referencing and so on are completely beside the point — if there should not be an article, then it does not matter how well-referenced the content you would want to put in that article might be. --
476:
166:
22:
287:
and, in particular, you have reached the maximum allowed reverts for one article in a 24 hour period. Please do not revert again, and use the talk page instead. One thing that would certainly be chaos is if many editors simply reverted each other back and forth on many articles; the goal of our rules
353:
I am sorry that you have run into an unpleasant situation so early in your
Knowledge (XXG) experience. I am sure you will find that most editing is not nearly so contentious. One thing that I often find more pleasant is to find some article marked as a "stub" and expand it into a longer article.
410:
As to removed it could be turned into a disambiguation page or redirect to remove and remove point to cousin as well I suppose, but it's not important, Knowledge (XXG) is not a dictionary, Wiktionary is the place for worrying about that sort of thing. See also the dictionary definition
268:
Disagreed. What was before was useless. Neither of pages claimed to be "disambiguation" speak about "whole numbers". The talk page shows a "longstanding status" of unresolved confusion. Please discuss article content, not your opinion about whether article be or not to be.
502:
until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
213:. If you make another revert, you will be blocked per this rule. I will note that two different editors have reverted your edits. You should avoid reverting again until there is clear agreement on the talk page in favor of your edits. — Carl
506:
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
141:
but it is my opinion that this is not an encyclopedic topic, but only an ambiguous word all of whose meanings are subsumed in other articles. If you disagree please open a discussion at the talk page,
375:, and condescending demeanor. Oh, and I bet that someone will be just as bullying if I try to fix a yet another consensus nonsense I've just detected: just click at the "
28:
Welcome to
Knowledge (XXG). Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Knowledge (XXG), but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to
283:
I hope you both can use the article talk page to discuss the issue. I only come here, as a
Knowledge (XXG) administrator, to point out that you appear to be engaged in
499:
488:
147:
379:" link redirect. Enough of this bickering. Consider me removed, but not your cousin, contrar to what wikipedia suggests by this stupid redirect.
55:
to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to
Knowledge (XXG) articles, and
94:
209:, there is a firm limit of no more than 3 reverts on any one article within a 24 hour period. You have made 3 reverts today on
150:, given that the page gets so little traffic that your remarks on the talk page are unlikely to be seen by very many people. --
492:
250:, because it does not describe any nontrivial content not handled just as well elsewhere. There is a *page* called
74:, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please
284:
52:
393:
Actually it was you who removed the disambiguation marker and replaced it with a stub marker with this edit
193:
180:
64:
108:
188:
48:
445:
259:
155:
56:
483:
467:
60:
513:
143:
380:
333:
314:
270:
232:
119:
97:
206:
436:
is silly. I think I'll list it on RfD. I can't see any good reason to wikilink the word
104:
75:
71:
40:
441:
419:
401:
255:
246:
What "chaos"? There is simply no good reason to have a
Knowledge (XXG) article called
184:
151:
35:
440:; if someone does, having it come up as a redlink is probably the correct behavior. --
371:
Oh, yeah? That's what I did. And I didn't find it pleasant, including your all smug,
361:
295:
220:
508:
210:
170:
138:
86:
29:
169:
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to
Knowledge (XXG), as you did at
415:
397:
79:
518:
449:
423:
405:
388:
366:
341:
322:
300:
278:
263:
240:
225:
199:
159:
127:
112:
357:
291:
216:
82:, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
429:
376:
372:
433:
412:
231:
This is how you treat attempts to add meaningful content to chaos.
137:
Hi, Max. Welcome to
Knowledge (XXG). I appreciate your effort at
103:
ANN scored at 0.951423 on 2011-05-06T18:29:39+00:00 . Thank you.
51:
for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the
175:
187:
or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the
20:
487:
is suitable for inclusion in
Knowledge (XXG) according to
305:
Why don't you go and bully another person who reverts my
481:
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
394:
90:
85:
The following is the log entry regarding this warning:
414:
where the sense given here is the principal meaning.
32:, did not appear to be constructive and has been
500:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Roy Jewell
63:users from editing if they repeatedly engage in
8:
148:Knowledge (XXG) talk:Wikiproject Mathematics
118:This is not ClueBot. This is CluelessBot.
489:Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines
7:
288:is to avoid that situation. — Carl
179:. Your edits appear to constitute
14:
498:The article will be discussed at
332:I am sick of wikipedia editing.
474:
164:
428:Actually I kind of agree that
1:
519:16:00, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
70:ClueBot NG produces very few
146:, and perhaps mention it at
534:
311:referenced from textbooks
491:or whether it should be
384:
337:
318:
274:
236:
123:
450:20:36, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
424:10:23, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
406:10:14, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
389:00:49, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
367:00:39, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
342:00:32, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
323:00:31, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
301:00:28, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
279:00:25, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
264:00:19, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
241:00:15, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
226:00:02, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
200:23:58, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
160:23:34, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
128:18:32, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
113:18:29, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
205:Please note that, per
25:
24:
59:have the ability to
26:
365:
299:
224:
144:talk:whole number
525:
516:
511:
478:
477:
355:
289:
214:
198:
196:
178:
168:
167:
23:
533:
532:
528:
527:
526:
524:
523:
522:
514:
509:
479:
475:
472:
432:redirecting to
194:
192:
174:
165:
135:
72:false positives
21:
19:
12:
11:
5:
531:
529:
473:
471:
466:Nomination of
464:
463:
462:
461:
460:
459:
458:
457:
456:
455:
454:
453:
452:
408:
369:
330:
329:
328:
327:
326:
325:
303:
229:
228:
183:and have been
134:
131:
116:
115:
83:
80:report it here
68:
57:administrators
34:automatically
18:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
530:
521:
520:
517:
512:
504:
501:
496:
494:
490:
486:
485:
469:
465:
451:
447:
443:
439:
435:
431:
427:
426:
425:
421:
417:
413:
409:
407:
403:
399:
395:
392:
391:
390:
386:
382:
378:
374:
370:
368:
363:
359:
352:
351:
350:
349:
348:
347:
346:
345:
344:
343:
339:
335:
324:
320:
316:
312:
308:
304:
302:
297:
293:
286:
282:
281:
280:
276:
272:
267:
266:
265:
261:
257:
253:
249:
245:
244:
243:
242:
238:
234:
227:
222:
218:
212:
208:
204:
203:
202:
201:
197:
191:. Thank you.
190:
186:
182:
177:
172:
162:
161:
157:
153:
149:
145:
140:
132:
130:
129:
125:
121:
114:
110:
106:
102:
99:
96:
92:
88:
84:
81:
77:
76:read about it
73:
69:
66:
62:
58:
54:
50:
46:
45:
44:
42:
38:
37:
31:
16:
505:
497:
482:
480:
470:for deletion
437:
331:
310:
306:
285:edit warring
252:whole number
251:
248:whole number
247:
230:
211:whole number
171:Whole number
163:
139:whole number
136:
133:Whole number
117:
100:
87:Whole number
53:welcome page
39:(undone) by
33:
30:Whole number
27:
381:Max Longint
334:Max Longint
315:Max Longint
271:Max Longint
233:Max Longint
120:Max Longint
95:Max Longint
49:the sandbox
47:Please use
484:Roy Jewell
468:Roy Jewell
105:ClueBot NG
41:ClueBot NG
442:Trovatore
256:Trovatore
181:vandalism
176:this edit
152:Trovatore
65:vandalism
185:reverted
36:reverted
17:May 2011
510:FiendYT
493:deleted
438:removed
430:removed
377:removed
373:removed
354:— Carl
189:sandbox
91:changed
434:cousin
313:text?
207:WP:3RR
173:with
61:block
446:talk
420:talk
416:Dmcq
402:talk
398:Dmcq
385:talk
362:talk
338:talk
319:talk
309:and
296:talk
275:talk
260:talk
237:talk
221:talk
195:Meph
156:talk
124:talk
109:talk
89:was
358:CBM
307:new
292:CBM
217:CBM
101:(t)
98:(u)
93:by
43:.
495:.
448:)
422:)
404:)
396:.
387:)
360:·
340:)
321:)
294:·
277:)
262:)
239:)
219:·
158:)
126:)
111:)
78:,
515:★
444:(
418:(
400:(
383:(
364:)
356:(
336:(
317:(
298:)
290:(
273:(
258:(
235:(
223:)
215:(
154:(
122:(
107:(
67:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.